Next Article in Journal
Orderly Charging and Discharging Group Scheduling Strategy for Electric Vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
In-Depth Steel Crack Analysis Using Photoacoustic Imaging (PAI) with Machine Learning-Based Image Processing Techniques and Evaluating PAI-Based Internal Steel Crack Feasibility
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluating a Kinematic Data Glove with Pressure Sensors to Automatically Differentiate Free Motion from Product Manipulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Hand and Wrist Biomechanics

by
Verónica Gracia-Ibáñez
*,
Néstor J. Jarque-Bou
and
Margarita Vergara
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Construction, Jaume I University, Castellón de la Plana, 12071 Castellón, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(24), 13158; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132413158
Submission received: 8 November 2023 / Accepted: 5 December 2023 / Published: 11 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hand and Wrist Biomechanics)
The complexity of the human hand enables us to carry out a huge variety of activities, providing us with functional independence [1]. In-depth knowledge of healthy hand behaviour, from grasping biomechanics to complex manipulation in daily life activities, regarding both kinematics and muscle activation comprehension, is a challenging field. This knowledge is of vital importance in areas such as robotics and prosthetics [2,3], especially when trying to imitate the behaviour of the human hand, which is one of the most difficult parts of the human body to imitate. It is also key in ergonomics, for product design as well as for improving work environments [4]. Designs must consider healthy hand and wrist operating parameters to avoid forcing the human mechanisms, in order to avert injuries [5]. In addition, many injuries and pathologies affecting the hand and wrist cause a large number of people each year to suffer from disabilities, preventing them from a fully functional life [6]. Understanding the biomechanical limitations produced by these diseases is of vital importance in clinical decision making and in rehabilitation treatments [7].
This Special Issue contains contributions on (i) studies that improve the biomechanical understanding of the healthy human hand and wrist; and (ii) applied health studies that use biomechanical parameters of the healthy human hand and wrist as a gold standard. These parameters are used in certain pathologies for a better understanding of the functional limitations they produce or for the design of implants to improve surgical techniques.
This Special Issue comprises a total of five papers, including work on the use of smoothness metrics; tackling whether to characterize healthy wrists or to analyse improvements in hand trajectories after rehabilitation in paediatric patients with spinal cord injury (SCI); the use of finite element modelling to analyse carpal tunnel syndrome behaviour; and even the test of a novel passive implant to restore finger flexion following tendon transfer surgery. Finally, a short communication analysing a kinematic data glove with pressure sensors is also included. Scano et al. (Contribution 1) provide mapping of four smoothness metrics for the wrist (NJ: normalized jerk, SM: speed metric, SAL: spectral arc length, and NP: number of speed peaks wrist). Smoothness is correlated with motor impairment and with clinical measures; thus, the study enables a better characterization and understanding of smoothness behaviour in healthy subjects, establishing benchmark values for clinical applications. Future works analysing wrist metrics in specific pathologies should be performed. Salas-Moreno et al. (Contribution 2) analysed smoothness and efficiency metrics of the hand trajectory in paediatric SCI patients after rehabilitation supported by a humanoid robot. They found that the training produced improvements in tetraplegia patients, but not in paraplegia patients without impaired manipulative dexterity. Peshin et al.’s model (Contribution 3) shows wrist flexion as the most traumatic movement in compressing the median nerve, compared to wrist extension or finger flexion. A decrease in compression during finger flexion was noticed with wrist extension followed by finger flexion. The passive implants proposed by Raja et al. (Contribution 4), to be used instead of tendon transfer surgery after high median-nerve palsy, improved finger flexion and force production, thus improving grasp performance whilst implying only one additional suturing step, increasing the surgery by 15 min at the most. Roda-Sales et al. (Contribution 5) analysed the feasibility of using a kinematic data glove with pressure sensors to automatically differentiate free motion from product manipulation, stating that it would be very useful in kinematic analysis, but the current design of the gloves does not allow for this at the moment.
Although the scope of the articles in the Special Issue was broad, four of the five articles have focused on the application of hand and wrist biomechanics for clinical use, which gives an idea of the relevance of research in this field.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

As Guest Editors of the Special Issue “Hand and Wrist Biomechanics”, we would like to express our gratitude to all the authors and peer reviewers for their valuable contributions. We would also like to express our appreciation to all the staff and people who have been involved in the production of this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Scano, A.; Brambilla, C.; Müller, H.; Atzori, M. Mapping of the Upper Limb Work-Space: Benchmarking Four Wrist Smoothness Metrics. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 12643. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP122412643.
  • Salas-Monedero, M.; Cereijo-Herranz, V.; DelosReyes-Guzmán, A.; Pérez-Borrego, Y.; Gil-Agudo, A.; García-Martín, F.; Pulido-Pascual, J.C.; López-Dolado, E. Smoothness and Efficiency Metrics Behavior after an Upper Extremity Training with Robic Humanoid Robot in Paediatric Spinal Cord Injured Patients. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4979. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13084979.
  • Peshin, S.; Karakulova, Y.; Kuchumov, A.G. Finite Element Modeling of the Fingers and Wrist Flexion/Extension Effect on Median Nerve Compression. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13021219.
  • Chakravarthi Raja, S.; You, W.S.; Jalaleddini, K.; Casebier, J.C.; Lightdale-Miric, N.R.; Hentz, V.R.; Valero-Cuevas, F.J.; Balasubramanian, R. A Novel Passive Implantable Differential Mechanism to Restore Individuated Finger Flexion during Grasping Following Tendon Transfer Surgery: A Pilot Study. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5804. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13095804.
  • Roda-Sales, A.; Sancho-Bru, J.L.; Vergara, M. Evaluating a Kinematic Data Glove with Pressure Sensors to Automatically Differentiate Free Motion from Product Manipulation. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 8765. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13158765.

References

  1. Oatis, C.A. Kinesiology: The Mechanics and Pathomechanics of Human Movement, 2nd ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013; ISBN 9781469837574. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sburlea, A.I.; Müller-Putz, G.R. Exploring representations of human grasping in neural, muscle and kinematic signals. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Grinyagin, I.V.; Biryukova, E.V.; Maier, M.A. Kinematic and dynamic synergies of human precision-grip movements. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94, 2284–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, K.-S.; Jung, M.-C. Ergonomic evaluation of biomechanical hand function. Saf. Health Work 2015, 6, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. DiSalvo, C.; Gemperle, F. From seduction to fulfilment: The use of anthropomorphic form in design. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 23–26 June 2003; pp. 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Crowe, C.S.; Massenburg, B.B.; Morrison, S.D.; Chang, J.; Friedrich, J.B.; Abady, G.G.; Alahdab, F.; Alipour, V.; Arabloo, J.; Asaad, M.; et al. Global trends of hand and wrist trauma: A systematic analysis of fracture and digit amputation using the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. Inj. Prev. 2020, 26 (Suppl. 1), i115–i124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kerkhof, F.; Kenney, D.; Ogle, M.; Shelby, T.; Ladd, A. The Biomechanics of Osteoarthritis in the Hand: Implications and Prospects for Hand Therapy. J. Hand Ther. 2022, 35, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gracia-Ibáñez, V.; Jarque-Bou, N.J.; Vergara, M. Hand and Wrist Biomechanics. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13158. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132413158

AMA Style

Gracia-Ibáñez V, Jarque-Bou NJ, Vergara M. Hand and Wrist Biomechanics. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(24):13158. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132413158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gracia-Ibáñez, Verónica, Néstor J. Jarque-Bou, and Margarita Vergara. 2023. "Hand and Wrist Biomechanics" Applied Sciences 13, no. 24: 13158. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132413158

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop