Dynamic Balance Simulation and Optimization of Electric Vehicle Scroll Compressor Rotor System

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This research work introduces a dynamic simulation and optimization of electric vehicle

scroll compressor rotor system. The presentation of this paper need some improvement and clearly addressing the following comment can contribute in improving the quality of this paper.

-Can you elaborate more about the concept of dynamic balance in the context of scroll compressor rotor systems?

-What are the major factors that has a direct effect and influence on the dynamic balance of the rotor system contributing in an electric vehicle's compressor?

-Please clearly address the specific challenges in electric vehicle compressor systems to easy catch the contribution of the research work proposed in this paper

-Please elaborate how the optimizing the dynamic balance of the rotor system enhances the overall efficiency and sustainability of electric vehicles?

Please cross-check all the grammatically errors and check all contents for any typos.

Author Response

please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Title: Dynamic Balance Simulation and Optimization of Electric Vehicle Scroll Compressor Rotor System

GENERAL COMMENT

The topic of this article is very interesting. However, the scientific sound is poor since there are relevant deficiencies in the methodology. These methodological deficiencies lead us to inconsistent results since they are not supported (see major comments). The equations must be entered in the main text. Also, the style and English is not adequate and should be improved.

MAJOR COMMENTS

[Preliminary section] A preliminary section of abbreviations and used units is suggested.

[MAJOR COMMENT 1 -Lines 146-148] You mention meshing. The study of the different meshes, the convergence criterion, the quality of the mesh among other issues is of vital importance to obtain adequate results. I don't see the study of meshing in your article.

[MAJOR COMMENT 2 -Lines 173-183] With what instrumentation do you measure the studied parameters (rotation, inlet pressure, outlet pressure…) ? Is it calibrated in any laboratory? I don't see anything in your article.

[MAJOR COMMENT 3 -Lines 216-227] I don't see anything about the study of the turbulence model in their simulations. Which one have you used? Why?

MINOR COMMENTS

[line 26] andair. Space.

[lines 44-45] I don’t understand this sentence. English style and grammar.

[line 103] Fig. 1 [line 115] Figure 2. You must use the same format when introducing the word Figure in the main text.

[lines 119-120] You must indicate the input of the equations and to what concept correspond.

[lines 121-128] You must indicate the units

ENGLISH STYLE

Moderate editing of English language required.

OVERALL RECOMENDATION

Reject.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Moderate editing of English language required.

Author Response

Please refer to the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors addressed my queries. No further comment.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Authors have justified their decisions based on my comments and, when appropriate, have incorporated them into this final version of the manuscript.

ENGLISH STYLE

Minor editing of English language required.

OVERALL RECOMMENDATION

Accept in present form.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required.