Next Article in Journal
Aflatoxin B1 Detoxification and Antioxidant Effect of Selected Omani Medicinal Plants against Aflatoxin B1-Induced Oxidative Stress Pathogenesis in the Mouse Liver
Previous Article in Journal
Water Impermeability of Self-Compacting Fly-Ash-Containing Concrete
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Segmentation-Based Optimal Seamline Generation Method for SAR Image Mosaic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Multi-Objective Optimization for Complex Systems Considering Both Performance Optimality and Robustness

1
School of Statistics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China
2
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
3
School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(13), 5371; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135371
Submission received: 10 May 2024 / Revised: 18 June 2024 / Accepted: 20 June 2024 / Published: 21 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Space Applications)

Abstract

As engineering systems become increasingly complex, performance requirements rise, and tolerance for design parameter variations becomes more crucial due to increased uncertainty. Tolerance to parameter variation can be measured by the volume of the solution space. A larger solution space implies a higher tolerance to parameter changes and thus greater robustness. The box-shaped solution space, represented by intervals with respect to each design parameter, has the advantage of showing which design parameters can be decoupled. Therefore, this paper proposes a new multi-objective optimization problem to optimize both the performance and volume of the box-shaped solution space simultaneously. Often, optimal performance and maximum volume are conflicting objectives, indicating a trade-off between performance and robustness. Furthermore, the DIRECT-NSGA-II approach is proposed for solving this multi-objective optimization problem. The DIRECT algorithm evaluates the minimum value of the performance function within the box-shaped solution space, while the NSGA-II algorithm identifies Pareto-optimal solution spaces. Finally, two case studies are implemented to illustrate the effectiveness of the DIRECT-NSGA-II method. We can conclude that (I) the proposed DIRECT-NSGA-II approach is suitable for black-box performance functions, (II) any point within the obtained solution space is a good design point, and (III) the proposed optimization problem considers both performance optimality and robustness, enabling the identification of a representative set of Pareto-optimal solution spaces that balance these two factors.
Keywords: performance optimality; robustness; box-shaped solution space; DIRECT; NSGA-II performance optimality; robustness; box-shaped solution space; DIRECT; NSGA-II

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Shi, J. Multi-Objective Optimization for Complex Systems Considering Both Performance Optimality and Robustness. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 5371. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135371

AMA Style

Chen Y, Shi J. Multi-Objective Optimization for Complex Systems Considering Both Performance Optimality and Robustness. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(13):5371. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135371

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yue, and Jian Shi. 2024. "Multi-Objective Optimization for Complex Systems Considering Both Performance Optimality and Robustness" Applied Sciences 14, no. 13: 5371. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135371

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop