Next Article in Journal
A Heat Load Prediction Method for District Heating Systems Based on the AE-GWO-GRU Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Wobble Board Performance: A Practical and Useful Quantification in Balance Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Realization of Impression Evidence with Reverse Engineering and Additive Manufacturing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating Acceleration and Deceleration Patterns in Elite Youth Football: The Interplay of Ball Possession and Tactical Behavior
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ketogenic Diet Plus Resistance Training Applied to Physio-Pathological Conditions: A Brief Review

by
Roberto Cannataro
1,2,3,†,
Jorge Luis Petro
3,4,†,
Diana Marisol Abrego-Guandique
5,
Erika Cione
1,2,*,
Maria Cristina Caroleo
5,
Richard B. Kreider
6 and
Diego A. Bonilla
3,4,7
1
Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, CS, Italy
2
Galascreen Laboratories, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, CS, Italy
3
Research Division, Dynamical Business & Science Society, DBSS International SAS, Bogotá 110861, Colombia
4
Research Group in Physical Activity, Sports and Health Sciences (GICAFS), Universidad de Córdoba, Montería 230002, Colombia
5
Department of Health Sciences, University of Magna Graecia Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, CZ, Italy
6
Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
7
Hologenomiks Research Group, Department of Genetics, Physical Anthropology and Animal Physiology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(13), 5445; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135445
Submission received: 29 April 2024 / Revised: 6 June 2024 / Accepted: 19 June 2024 / Published: 23 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sports Medicine: Latest Advances and Prospects)

Abstract

:
The ketogenic diet (KD) is a nutritional strategy characterized by a reduced intake of carbohydrates (between 30 and 45 g per day or ≈5% of one’s total calories from this macronutrient). The regimen induces physiological ketosis in which serum levels of ketone bodies increase from 0.5 to 3.0 mM, becoming an essential contributor to energy production. The popularity of using the KD to lose weight and its application in specific physio-pathological conditions, such as epilepsy, lipedema, and polycystic ovary syndrome, which is maintained over extended periods, gave us the impulse to write this brief review. In these types of physio-pathological conditions, subjects can achieve favorable training outcomes even if adhering to a KD. Therefore, performing resistance training under the KD to enhance muscle status and quality of life could be possible. It is important to note that, while some statements here suggest potential future directions, they are hypotheses that require experimental validation, even if they are supported by the independent benefits reported from the KD and resistance training and represent a promising area for future research.

1. Introduction to Ketogenic Diet

The ketogenic diet (KD) is a nutritional regimen characterized by a reduced carbohydrate intake, typically less than 30–45 g per day or ≈5% of total calories. A small amount of carbohydrates is included in the diet because red blood cells, lacking mitochondria, rely exclusively on glucose as an energy source (which can also come from the glycerol of triglycerides or gluconeogenesis) [1,2]. The decreased carbohydrate intake induces a physiological ketogenesis, resulting in serum ketone bodies (β-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate, and acetone) ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 mM. These molecules are synthesized in the liver, but they serve as energy substrates in other cells, such as neurons in the central nervous system (CNS). Unlike fatty acids, which are not capable of crossing the blood–brain barrier (BBB), the ketone bodies, particularly β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), can do so via monocarboxylate transporters [3]. Overall, this leads to a shift in the body’s energy substrate from glucose to ketone bodies (Figure 1), with this as the main feature of dietary-induced ketogenesis [4]. Before reaching ketosis, the KD triggers glycogenolysis, reducing liver and muscle glycogen concentrations within the initial 3–6 days [5]. This can result in body mass reductions of one to four kilograms, considering that glycogen is stored with three to five times its mass in water [6]. Throughout this dietary-induced ketogenesis, common side effects described as “keto flu” may arise, including headache, difficulty concentrating, and nausea. These symptoms typically subside once a stable ketonemia level (>0.4 mmol/L) is maintained, generally after 5–7 days [7].

2. Ketogenic Diet Applied to Physio-Pathological Conditions Not Cancer Related

It is noteworthy to mention that older phenotypes might experience a slower glycogen depletion and ketogenesis rate [8], possibly due to an impairment of metabolic switching [9]. Even if using urine strips to assess ketosis is a common practice, practitioners and consumers should be cautious of potential false negatives [10]. For instance, BHB, one of the major ketoacids, does not react with nitroprusside in dipsticks. Hence, using self-blood monitoring for ketoacids is recommended. About one hundred years since its first application for the management of epilepsy [11], the KD has undergone numerous developments [12]. It is frequently employed as a non-pharmacological therapy in various physio-pathological conditions, such as, first of all, neurological disorders [13,14], polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) [15], obesity and lipedema [13,16,17], and, importantly, as a supportive measure for metabolic disorders [13,18]. It should be noted that the KD and other low-carbohydrate configurations are frequently used during a hypoenergetic diet to promote weight loss and improve body composition [19]. Several studies as part of the Curves Women’s Health & Fitness Initiative at the Exercise & Sport Nutrition Laboratory (Texas A&M University) have demonstrated that a carbohydrate-restricted diet promoted more favorable changes in weight loss, fat loss, and markers of health in obese women who initiated a circuit-style resistance training program compared with a diet higher in carbohydrate [20,21,22]. In fact, it seems that greater improvements in body composition are achieved when carbohydrates are replaced in the diet with protein, in general [23]. Similarly, the KD involves a high fat intake, accounting for up to 80% of total calories. Importantly, the protein/fat ratio varies based on the intended goal; for example, a 4:1 ratio for fat/protein intake has been discussed for pediatric epilepsy [24], and our research group has applied the 2.5:1 ratio to manage lipedema [16]. Its clinical use as well as short- and long-term non-desired effects [16,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43] are listed in Table 1.
Hence, despite its popularity, the KD should not be selected only under hypoenergetic conditions and the isocaloric ketogenic diet (ICKD) might be preferable if the aim is to support seizures, immune function, PCOS, and muscle status [44]. Although there are still relatively few studies on this topic, it seems that the ICKD could serve as a viable alternative to traditional diets, particularly in pathological conditions. For instance, Kim et al. [45] demonstrated that just three days of the ICKD led to improvements in inflammation-related parameters, particularly in regulating the inflammasome. This is of particular importance, if we consider the anti-inflammatory action through the modulation of nuclear factor-κB (NFκB) and the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NFE2L2, also known as Nrf2) [45]. Also, in a systematic review, Erickson et al. concluded that the ICKD could be beneficial in supporting the treatment of various types of tumors [46]. This is probably because cancer cells, known to use glucose preferentially as a substrate for growth, with a mechanism known as the Warburg effect, are delayed in their progression because of this metabolic alteration. In any case, here we want to discuss more regarding the KD applied to decreasing cancer levels.
Based on a meta-study which employed the meta-analysis model, it was found that the KD controls fasting blood glucose, and improves lipid metabolism in type 2 patients [47]. During the KD, the absence of glycemic and insulin fluctuations might have important biochemical implications, although energy balance remains the key factor for the KD in health promotion and disease therapeutics. For example, the very low-calorie KD (VLCKD), which provides a highly restricted caloric intake (less than 800 kcal per day), has been studied [48,49]. In subjects treated with the VLCKD, glycemic stability is guaranteed by hepatic neo-glucogenesis which induces the basal secretion of the insulin; this is also evident in obese sarcopenia patients [50]. Preserved insulin secretion prevents the onset of pathological ketoacidosis. Moreover, the level of insulin was maintained at about 7 to 9 mU/L [51]. Biochemical blood parameters under physiological ketosis are listed in Table 2.

3. Insulin-Dependent and -Independent Responses to Resistance Training

The musculoskeletal system represents a unique structure in which bones, muscles, ligaments, soft tissues, and tendons are intricately interconnected [52] and coordinated by neuromuscular junctions [53]. As a type of strength training, resistance exercise is characterized by the physical effort exerted when skeletal muscles work against a given weight or external force. Numerous positive health and physical performance adaptations have been reported when the stressful stimulus of resistance exercise is administered with appropriate time intervals and optimal recovery time in different phenotypes [54,55,56,57,58,59]. This remarkable plasticity is responsible for adaptations in physiological and pathophysiological conditions [60,61,62,63]. This ability of muscles to adapt to external stimuli relies on different signaling pathways and secondary messengers, which are responsible for maintaining muscle status. The concept of muscle status is encouraged, given that it encompasses not only quantity (skeletal muscle mass) but also gives relevance to intramuscular structural features (muscle quality), endocrine activity (insulin), and movement functionality. In particular, the mechanistic Target of Rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway [52], strongly activated by insulin, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [64] seem to play an essential role in resistance exercise-induced adaptations of musculoskeletal tissue.
Besides the insulin-mediated response, other biochemical signalers also contribute to muscular plasticity, including the mechano growth factor (MGF), testosterone, and the Protein Kinase B (PKB or AKT), which inhibits the Forkhead Box 1/3 FoxO1/3 pathway, providing an anticatabolic stimulus [65]. Additionally, nitric oxide (NO) and amino acids, particularly glutamine and leucine, are involved in these processes. Although leucine directly activates mTORC1 [66,67], muscle protein synthesis strongly relies on essential amino acids, so focusing on the amino acid profile rather than leucine content alone would be a recommended approach [68]. Interestingly, a recent study in a murine model showed that (D)-3-hydroxybutyrate, the main component of ketone bodies, has positive effects on muscle atrophy and beneficial metabolic reprogramming effects in healthy muscle [69]. Other non-dependent insulin biochemical mechanisms contributing to exercise-induced adaptations include the NFκB, which is downregulated by inflammation and reactive oxygen species (ROS), and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α), whose activation is particularly beneficial for mitochondrial health, but more responsive to endurance training [60] (Figure 2). These findings suggest that, even in the absence of continuous peaks of insulin stimulation, increased strength and/or hypertrophy can be achieved due to the intricate mechanisms and alternative pathways that characterizes the human physiology’s flexibility.

4. Allostatic Load in Resistance Training

Notably, when human physiology is subjected to intermittently repeated chronic stressors (such as resistance training, hypoenergetic conditions, and sleep deprivation), several biochemical regulators consistently operate outside their normal ranges, causing the entire biological system to suffer before adaptation. The adaptation can be achieved over time, and it is known as allostatic load [70]. In exercise sciences, this adaptation process is commonly elucidated by the principle of supercompensation, which suggests that following a stressor (such as resistance workload) there is a need for energy (nutrition) and time (rest) to compensate for the decline in performance and facilitate muscle recovery [71,72]. If the organism is placed under optimal conditions, it might result in functional overreaching, leading to positive adaptations (e.g., greater muscle strength or hypertrophy). However, if optimal conditions are not met, the body may experience non-functional over-reaching, resulting in a decline in performance that, if not properly managed, can progress to a pseudopathological state known as overtraining syndrome [73]. This syndrome serves as a prime example of allostatic overload in human physiology [74]. Considering the aforementioned remarks, it is worth noting that individualized and expert supervision, along with workload periodization, are crucial for a successful intervention [71,75]. This ensures that loads and workout intensity are properly adjusted. Generally, resistance exercise training, even with heavy loads, can be safely used in different pathological populations. For example, optimal interventions in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis, as well as in individuals with knee osteoarthritis [76,77,78] or older adults [79,80], result in favorable outcomes for both the overall health and management of the underlying conditions.

5. Ketogenic Diet Plus Resistance Training

It is well established that increasing dietary protein intake alongside an exercise intervention, especially resistance training, attenuates the body mass loss-induced reduction in muscle mass. Participants adhering to a KD consumed significantly higher amounts of dietary protein than those adhering to a non-KD. Nevertheless, the KD produces an unpleasant impact on muscle mass, which is lost in resistance-trained individuals, as is evidenced in a recent meta-analysis [81]. It also evidenced significant fluctuations of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) reported during the VLCKD, as we demonstrated with our research group after only three days of it [82]. On the other hand, recently, Chiarello et al. (28) conducted a study on altitude performance, showing that despite the absence of carbohydrates, the ICKD led to an improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max). Carbohydrate restriction leads to decreases in blood glucose, and it is possible that increased gluconeogenic activity could promote muscle mass loss to provide an amino acidic substrate to replenish the glucose and dietary protein intake’s small contribution to gluconeogenesis [83]. It is worth mentioning that a given resistance training workload (stimulus) requires special nutritional needs (e.g., energy, protein, creatine monohydrate) and recovery time (e.g., sleep quality, rest days, tapering). Following the 4Rs framework proposed by Bonilla et al., nutritional strategies to optimize post-exercise recovery encompass rehydration, refueling, repairing, and rest—pre-sleep nutrition [84]. If these are fulfilled by means of nutritional adherence and compliance, exercise-targeted adaptations might be achieved. Although it is suggested that the KD could lead to a more efficient utilization of energy substrates during exercise (enhancing oxidative metabolism), the impact of cardiac or muscle status for health and disease is not well understood [85]. Currently, the scientific community of exercise and sports agrees that carbohydrates (5–8 g/kg/day) are crucial for achieving improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy [86]. Indeed, recent studies by several authors have demonstrated that the net effect of the KD on strength and/or hypertrophy is likely to be diminished in most cases [81,87,88,89]. For most individuals engaged in moderate-to-high volume resistance training, emphasizing moderate-to-high intensity exercise performance, or primarily aiming to increase lean mass, KDs may not be the most optimal choice [90]. A recent systematic review with a Bayesian meta-analysis by Koerich et al. concluded that while the KD can be a useful strategy for total and body fat losses, a small negative effect on fat-free mass has been observed among the analyzed clinical trials; thus, the KD might not be suitable for enhancing 1-RM strength or high-intensity cyclic performances in trained individuals [91]. This suggests that those persons looking to maximize resistance training adaptations should consider a more balanced or traditional macronutrient distribution that allows for adequate carbohydrate intake, especially if they are unfamiliar with, do not enjoy, or do not adhere to the KD. In this regard, our research group recently demonstrated that resistance-trained individuals following a KD may experience performance declines and higher perceived effort in the early weeks as they adapt to reduced carbohydrate consumption. However, the KD did not influence resistance exercise performance in terms of the volume load, number of repetitions, or velocity loss at the end of the intervention [92]. Similarly, LaFountain et al. (2019) reported improvements in body composition with no significant changes in strength performance after high adherence to the KD in US military personnel [93]. Some studies have also shown that the KD might not impair body composition or performance in CrossTrainers who meet the energy requirements, protein intake, and adhere to the KD [94,95]. Based on the available evidence, we encourage the recommendations of conventional macronutrient distribution when performing a strength-based exercise program; however, if the individual, fitness enthusiast, or patient prefers and adheres to a KD regimen, current findings do not imply that progress is unattainable while following this diet, or that results are significantly different when compared to conventional high-carbohydrate diets once ketosis is reached and maintained over time.

6. Practical Recommendations to Combine Ketogenic Diet and Resistance Training

In 2020, the “keto diet” ranked as the most searched diet on Google in the United States of America [96]. Recent data further confirm the popularity of the KD, high-fat, and low-carbohydrate diets in the United States, as reported by the International Food Information Council (2023) [97]. Aware that ketone bodies constitute a double-edged sword for mammalian life spans [98], we also recognize that one nutritional intervention, such as a carbohydrate-rich diet, is not the sole option and it should be adjusted on an individual basis. In any case, it should be understood that any intervention cannot overlook the improvement in muscle status, and clinical evidence shows that individuals who adhere to a KD might achieve similar results compared to other conventional macronutrient distributions (see above). Additionally, it is well known that physical exercise, especially resistance training, should be incorporated into daily activities to enhance well-being, quality of life, and cardiometabolic health in patients with chronic diseases. Likewise, individuals who benefit from following a KD regimen, such as those with epilepsy [24,99], lipedema [16,84,85], GLUT1 deficiency [100,101,102], and PCOS [15,103], may also experience an improved quality of life by combining the nutritional strategy with a resistance exercise program. It is possible that the combination of a KD and resistance training results in fewer pathological symptoms, lower drug concentrations, and, consequently, fewer side effects, but further research is needed to consolidate clinical applications. It is relevant to consider the following points:
Ensure the energy balance or caloric surplus (if needed) to properly manage the pathological condition. In this sense, practitioners should pay attention to higher satiety due to high fat and protein intake.
Ensure an adequate daily protein intake of at least 1.5–1.6 g per kg of body mass. Physicians should consider the restrictions in protein intake for certain pathologies (e.g., kidney diseases). Protein of high biological value is recommended, including a combination of plant-based proteins, in order to ensure 8–10 g of essential amino acids and 2–3 g of leucine [68] are consumed.
Administer creatine monohydrate as a safe, effective, and conditionally essential nutrient (with vast evidence) to improve muscle strength and hypertrophy, as well as quality of life, cognitive function, and metabolic health when combined with resistance training. A daily dosage of 0.1 g per kilogram of body mass is recommended [104,105].
Consider vitamin C, N-acetylcysteine, and/or polyphenol supplementation. The KD program is limited to fruit and some vegetables; therefore, optimizing the antioxidant status could contribute to post-training recovery and overall health [106,107].
Nutritionists and dietitians should develop intervention strategies to improve adherence to the KD, since this is a key factor to have successful results [108].
Establish a low-load power-based training program based on objectives, population, and following non-linear (undulating) periodization focused on multi-joint exercises [71]. It should be noted that high-speed resistance training using a cluster set configuration might be suitable to avoid high fatigue levels, even in frail populations [80].
Prescribe and adjust resistance training workload (2–3 days/week) using the OMNI-RES perception scale, repetitions in reserve, and movement velocity (actual or perceived) [92].
Monitor the stress-response process and overall adaptation process using the allostatic load index as a composite of ten well-established biomarkers that correspond to four primary domains: the cardiovascular, endocrine, inflammatory, and metabolic systems. Readers are encouraged to refer to Beese et al. (2022) for recommendations to measure allostatic load [109].
Researchers studying these interventions are encouraged to follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance Exercise Studies (PRIRES) to increase transparency, quality, and reproducibility [110].

7. Concluding Remarks

The KD plus resistance training combination is an underexplored area of research; it could be essential to understand the combination’s effects. The current evidence suggests that a KD regimen might have similar results compared to carbohydrate diets; that is, once ketosis is achieved and maintained over time for physio-pathological conditions in which a KD is a non-pharmacological therapy to be maintained for a long period of time. Developing protocols that incorporate the training outcomes of resistance workload with its management, including unconventional biomarkers like the allostatic load index or microRNAs, holds potential for advancing the understanding and application of KDs in resistance training. Given the popularity of the KD and its current application in specific physio-pathological conditions, integrating it with resistance training could improve muscle status and quality of life.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C., E.C. and D.A.B.; Writing—original draft preparation, R.C., E.C. and D.A.B.; Writing—review and editing, J.L.P., D.M.A.-G., M.C.C. and R.B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

R.C. receives honoraria for personalized nutrition services including the application of the ketogenic diet. R.B.K. has conducted industry-sponsored research, received financial support for presenting about dietary supplements at industry-sponsored scientific conferences, and has served as an expert witness on cases related to exercise physiology and nutrition. Additionally, R.B.K. serves as the chair of the “Creatine for Health” scientific advisory board sponsored by Creapure® & Creavitalis®—Alzchem Group AG (Germany), while D.A.B. serves as a scientific affiliate of this board. D.A.B. has also acted as a scientific consultant for MTX Corporation®, MET-Rx® and Healthy Sports, and has received honoraria for speaking about nutrient supplements at private courses. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. All authors are responsible for the content of the article.

References

  1. Cannataro, R. Ketogenic diet: Possible mechanism, old and new applications. Exp. Physiol. 2023, 108, 327–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dąbek, A.; Wojtala, M.; Pirola, L.; Balcerczyk, A. Modulation of Cellular Biochemistry, Epigenetics and Metabolomics by Ketone Bodies. Implications of the Ketogenic Diet in the Physiology of the Organism and Pathological States. Nutrients 2020, 12, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jensen, N.J.; Wodschow, H.Z.; Nilsson, M.; Rungby, J. Effects of Ketone Bodies on Brain Metabolism and Function in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhu, H.; Bi, D.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, C.; Du, J.; Wu, X.; Wei, Q.; Qin, H. Ketogenic diet for human diseases: The underlying mechanisms and potential for clinical implementations. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yakupova, E.I.; Bocharnikov, A.D.; Plotnikov, E.Y. Effects of Ketogenic Diet on Muscle Metabolism in Health and Disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Olsson, K.-E.; Saltin, B. Variation in Total Body Water with Muscle Glycogen Changes in Man. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1970, 80, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bostock, E.C.S.; Kirkby, K.C.; Taylor, B.V.; Hawrelak, J.A. Consumer Reports of “Keto Flu” Associated with the Ketogenic Diet. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 511082. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2020.00020 (accessed on 1 January 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Porper, K.; Zach, L.; Shpatz, Y.; Ben-Zeev, B.; Tzadok, M.; Jan, E.; Talianski, A.; Champ, C.E.; Symon, Z.; Anikster, Y.; et al. Dietary-Induced Ketogenesis: Adults Are Not Children. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hernandez, A.; Truckenbrod, L.; Federico, Q.; Campos, K.; Moon, B.; Ferekides, N.; Hoppe, M.; D’Agostino, D.; Burke, S. Metabolic switching is impaired by aging and facilitated by ketosis independent of glycogen. Aging 2020, 12, 7963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gibson, A.A.; Eroglu, E.I.; Rooney, K.; Harper, C.; McClintock, S.; Franklin, J.; Markovic, T.P.; Seimon, R.V.; Sainsbury, A. Urine dipsticks are not accurate for detecting mild ketosis during a severely energy restricted diet. Obes. Sci. Pract. 2020, 6, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rm, W. The effects of ketonemia on the course of epilepsy. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1921, 2, 307–308. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wheless, J.W. History of the ketogenic diet. Epilepsia 2008, 49, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Noakes, T.D.; Windt, J. Evidence that supports the prescription of low-carbohydrate high-fat diets: A narrative review. Br. J. Sports Med. 2017, 51, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Huntriss, R.; Campbell, M.; Bedwell, C. The interpretation and effect of a low-carbohydrate diet in the management of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Barrea, L.; Verde, L.; Camajani, E.; Cernea, S.; Frias-Toral, E.; Lamabadusuriya, D.; Ceriani, F.; Savastano, S.; Colao, A.; Muscogiuri, G. Ketogenic diet as medical prescription in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2023, 12, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cannataro, R.; Michelini, S.; Ricolfi, L.; Caroleo, M.C.; Gallelli, L.; Sarro, G.D.; Onorato, A.; Cione, E. Management of Lipedema with Ketogenic Diet: 22-Month Follow-Up. Life 2021, 11, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Paoli, A.; Rubini, A.; Volek, J.S.; Grimaldi, K.A. Beyond weight loss: A review of the therapeutic uses of very-low-carbohydrate (ketogenic) diets. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 67, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Klement, R.J. Beneficial effects of ketogenic diets for cancer patients: A realist review with focus on evidence and confirmation. Med. Oncol. 2017, 34, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cannataro, R.; Perri, M.; Gallelli, L.; Caroleo, M.C.; De Sarro, G.; Cione, E. Ketogenic diet acts on body remodeling and microRNAs expression profile. MicroRNA 2019, 8, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kerksick, C.; Thomas, A.; Campbell, B.; Taylor, L.; Wilborn, C.; Marcello, B.; Roberts, M.; Pfau, E.; Grimstvedt, M.; Opusunju, J. Effects of a popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women. Nutr. Metab. 2009, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lockard, B.; Earnest, C.P.; Oliver, J.; Goodenough, C.; Rasmussen, C.; Greenwood, M.; Kreider, R.B. Retrospective analysis of protein-and carbohydrate-focused diets combined with exercise on metabolic syndrome prevalence in overweight and obese women. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2016, 14, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kreider, R.B.; Rasmussen, C.; Kerksick, C.M.; Wilborn, C.; Taylor IV, L.; Campbell, B.; Magrans-Courtney, T.; Fogt, D.; Ferreira, M.; Li, R. A carbohydrate-restricted diet during resistance training promotes more favorable changes in body composition and markers of health in obese women with and without insulin resistance. Phys. Sportsmed. 2011, 39, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kreider, R.B. Exercise and nutritional strategies to promote weight loss: A narrative review1. OBM Integr. Complement. Med. 2021, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sharma, S.; Whitney, R.; Kossoff, E.H.; RamachandranNair, R. Does the ketogenic ratio matter when using ketogenic diet therapy in pediatric epilepsy? Epilepsia 2023, 64, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Batch, J.T.; Lamsal, S.P.; Adkins, M.; Sultan, S.; Ramirez, M.N. Advantages and Disadvantages of the Ketogenic Diet: A Review Article. Cureus 2020, 12, e9639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kossoff, E.H.; Zupec-Kania, B.A.; Amark, P.E.; Ballaban-Gil, K.R.; Christina Bergqvist, A.G.; Blackford, R.; Buchhalter, J.R.; Caraballo, R.H.; Helen Cross, J.; Dahlin, M.G. Optimal clinical management of children receiving the ketogenic diet: Recommendations of the International Ketogenic Diet Study Group. Epilepsia 2009, 50, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Newmaster, K.; Zhu, Z.; Bolt, E.; Chang, R.J.; Day, C.; Mhanna, A.; Paudel, S.; Farooq, O.; Swaminathan, A.; Acharya, P.; et al. A Review of the Multi-Systemic Complications of a Ketogenic Diet in Children and Infants with Epilepsy. Children 2022, 9, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schwartz, R.H.; Eaton, J.; Bower, B.D.; Aynsley-Green, A. Ketogenic diets in the treatment of epilepsy: Short-term clinical effects. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 1989, 31, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. El-Shafie, A.M.; Bahbah, W.A.; Abd El Naby, S.A.; Omar, Z.A.; Basma, E.M.; Hegazy, A.A.A.; El Zefzaf, H.M.S. Impact of two ketogenic diet types in refractory childhood epilepsy. Pediatr. Res. 2023, 94, 1978–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Caraballo, R.H.; Cersósimo, R.O.; Sakr, D.; Cresta, A.; Escobal, N.; Fejerman, N. Ketogenic diet in patients with myoclonic-astatic epilepsy. Epileptic Disord. 2006, 8, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Phillips, M.C.L.; Murtagh, D.K.J.; Gilbertson, L.J.; Asztely, F.J.S.; Lynch, C.D.P. Low-fat versus ketogenic diet in Parkinson’s disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Mov. Disord. 2018, 33, 1306–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Krikorian, R.; Boespflug, E.L.; Dudley, J.A.; Norris, M.M.; Chu, W.-J.; Summer, S.S.; Eliassen, J.C. Enhanced cerebral bioenergetics with dietary ketosis in mild cognitive impairment. Nutr. Aging 2014, 2, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brenton, J.N.; Lehner-Gulotta, D.; Woolbright, E.; Banwell, B.; Bergqvist, A.G.C.; Chen, S.; Coleman, R.; Conaway, M.; Goldman, M.D. Phase II study of ketogenic diets in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Safety, tolerability and potential clinical benefits. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2022, 93, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cannataro, R.; Perri, M.; Caroleo, M.C.; Gallelli, L.; De Sarro, G.; Cione, E. Modulation of MicroRNAs Linked to Pain-migraine by Ketogenic Diet (P14-007-19). Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2019, 3, nzz052.P14-007-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Calabrese, L.; Frase, R.; Ghaloo, M. Complete remission of depression and anxiety using a ketogenic diet: Case series. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1396685. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1396685 (accessed on 1 January 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, R.W.Y.; Corley, M.J.; Pang, A.; Arakaki, G.; Abbott, L.; Nishimoto, M.; Miyamoto, R.; Lee, E.; Yamamoto, S.; Maunakea, A.K. A modified ketogenic gluten-free diet with MCT improves behavior in children with autism spectrum disorder. Physiol. Behav. 2018, 188, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dyńka, D.; Kowalcze, K.; Ambrozkiewicz, F.; Paziewska, A. Effect of the Ketogenic Diet on the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of the Meta-Analyses and Clinical Trials. Nutrients 2023, 15, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Charlot, A.; Zoll, J. Beneficial Effects of the Ketogenic Diet in Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Diabetology 2022, 3, 292–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Paoli, A.; Mancin, L.; Giacona, M.C.; Bianco, A.; Caprio, M. Effects of a ketogenic diet in overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tendler, D.; Lin, S.; Yancy, W.S.; Mavropoulos, J.; Sylvestre, P.; Rockey, D.C.; Westman, E.C. The effect of a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A pilot study. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2007, 52, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Klepper, J.; Diefenbach, S.; Kohlschütter, A.; Voit, T. Effects of the ketogenic diet in the glucose transporter 1 deficiency syndrome. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2004, 70, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sofou, K.; Dahlin, M.; Hallböök, T.; Lindefeldt, M.; Viggedal, G.; Darin, N. Ketogenic diet in pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency: Short- and long-term outcomes. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2017, 40, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Similä, M.E.; Auranen, M.; Piirilä, P.L. Beneficial Effects of Ketogenic Diet on Phosphofructokinase Deficiency (Glycogen Storage Disease Type VII). Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 504281. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.00057 (accessed on 1 January 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, K.; Yang, W.; Li, B. The anticonvulsant effects of ketogenic diet on epileptic seizures and potential mechanisms. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2018, 16, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kim, E.R.; Kim, S.R.; Cho, W.; Lee, S.-G.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, E.; Kim, J.-H.; Yu, J.-W.; Lee, B.-W.; et al. Short Term Isocaloric Ketogenic Diet Modulates NLRP3 Inflammasome Via B-hydroxybutyrate and Fibroblast Growth Factor 21. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 843520. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2022.843520 (accessed on 1 February 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Erickson, N.; Boscheri, A.; Linke, B.; Huebner, J. Systematic review: Isocaloric ketogenic dietary regimes for cancer patients. Med. Oncol. 2017, 34, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yuan, X.; Wang, J.; Yang, S.; Gao, M.; Cao, L.; Li, X.; Hong, D.; Tian, S.; Sun, C. Effect of the ketogenic diet on glycemic control, insulin resistance, and lipid metabolism in patients with T2DM: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr. Diabetes 2020, 10, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dashti, H.M.; Mathew, T.C.; Khadada, M.; Al-Mousawi, M.; Talib, H.; Asfar, S.K.; Behbahani, A.I.; Al-Zaid, N.S. Beneficial effects of ketogenic diet in obese diabetic subjects. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 302, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Saslow, L.R.; Mason, A.E.; Kim, S.; Goldman, V.; Ploutz-Snyder, R.; Bayandorian, H.; Daubenmier, J.; Hecht, F.M.; Moskowitz, J.T. An Online Intervention Comparing a Very Low-Carbohydrate Ketogenic Diet and Lifestyle Recommendations versus a Plate Method Diet in Overweight Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017, 19, e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Camajani, E.; Feraco, A.; Basciani, S.; Gnessi, L.; Barrea, L.; Armani, A.; Caprio, M. VLCKD in Combination with Physical Exercise Preserves Skeletal Muscle Mass in Sarcopenic Obesity after Severe COVID-19 Disease: A Case Report. Healthcare 2022, 10, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Fatati, G. VLCD and VLCKD in the treatment of obese people with non-insulin-dependent diabetes or prediabetes: Clinical evidence and reflections. Recent. Prog. Med. 2020, 111, 492–502. [Google Scholar]
  52. Van der Wal, J. The architecture of the connective tissue in the musculoskeletal system—An often overlooked functional parameter as to proprioception in the locomotor apparatus. Int. J. Ther. Massage Bodyw. 2009, 2, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rodríguez Cruz, P.M.; Cossins, J.; Beeson, D.; Vincent, A. The neuromuscular junction in health and disease: Molecular mechanisms governing synaptic formation and homeostasis. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 610964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mcleod, J.C.; Currier, B.S.; Lowisz, C.V.; Phillips, S.M. The influence of resistance exercise training prescription variables on skeletal muscle mass, strength, and physical function in healthy adults: An umbrella review. J. Sport Health Sci. 2023, 13, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wehrmann, A.; Tian, E.J.; Tyack, E.L.; Kumar, S. The evidence of effectiveness of isometric resistance training on the management of hypertension in adults: An umbrella review. Blood Press. Monit. 2023, 28, 171–184. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/bpmonitoring/fulltext/2023/08000/the_evidence_of_effectiveness_of_isometric.1.aspx (accessed on 1 January 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Paolucci, T.; Sbardella, S.; La Russa, C.; Agostini, F.; Mangone, M.; Tramontana, L.; Bernetti, A.; Paoloni, M.; Pezzi, L.; Bellomo, R.G.; et al. Evidence of Rehabilitative Impact of Progressive Resistance Training (PRT) Programs in Parkinson Disease: An Umbrella Review. Park. Dis. 2020, 2020, 9748091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Perez-Dominguez, B.; Suso-Marti, L.; Dominguez-Navarro, F.; Perpiña-Martinez, S.; Calatayud, J.; Casaña, J. Effects of resistance training on patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: An umbrella review with meta-analysis of the pooled findings. J. Nephrol. 2023, 36, 1805–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lopez, P.; Taaffe, D.R.; Galvão, D.A.; Newton, R.U.; Nonemacher, E.R.; Wendt, V.M.; Bassanesi, R.N.; Turella, D.J.P.; Rech, A. Resistance training effectiveness on body composition and body weight outcomes in individuals with overweight and obesity across the lifespan: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2022, 23, e13428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Fausto, D.Y.; Martins, J.B.B.; Machado, A.C.; Saraiva, P.S.; Pelegrini, A.; Guimarães, A.C.A. What is the evidence for the effect of physical exercise on bone health in menopausal women? An umbrella systematic review. Climacteric 2023, 26, 550–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hoppeler, H. Molecular networks in skeletal muscle plasticity. J. Exp. Biol. 2016, 219, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Furrer, R.; Hawley, J.A.; Handschin, C. The molecular athlete: Exercise physiology from mechanisms to medals. Physiol. Rev. 2023, 103, 1693–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Shimkus, K.L.; Shirazi-Fard, Y.; Wiggs, M.P.; Ullah, S.T.; Pohlenz, C.; Gatlin, D.M., 3rd; Carroll, C.C.; Hogan, H.A.; Fluckey, J.D. Responses of skeletal muscle size and anabolism are reproducible with multiple periods of unloading/reloading. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018, 125, 1456–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Snijders, T.; Nederveen, J.P.; McKay, B.R.; Joanisse, S.; Verdijk, L.B.; van Loon, L.J.C.; Parise, G. Satellite cells in human skeletal muscle plasticity. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shi, H.; Scheffler, J.M.; Zeng, C.; Pleitner, J.M.; Hannon, K.M.; Grant, A.L.; Gerrard, D.E. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling is necessary for the maintenance of skeletal muscle mass. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2009, 296, C1040–C1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hymer, W.C.; Kraemer, W.J. Resistance exercise stress: Theoretical mechanisms for growth hormone processing and release from the anterior pituitary somatotroph. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2023, 123, 1867–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Szwed, A.; Kim, E.; Jacinto, E. Regulation and metabolic functions of mTORC1 and mTORC2. Physiol. Rev. 2021, 101, 1371–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lynch, C.J. Role of leucine in the regulation of mTOR by amino acids: Revelations from structure–activity studies. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 861S–865S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ferrando, A.A.; Wolfe, R.R.; Hirsch, K.R.; Church, D.D.; Kviatkovsky, S.A.; Roberts, M.D.; Stout, J.R.; Gonzalez, D.E.; Sowinski, R.J.; Kreider, R.B. International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Effects of essential amino acid supplementation on exercise and performance. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2023, 20, 2263409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; Yuan, H.; Pang, X.; Liu, Y.; Tao, W. Mechanism of reduced muscle atrophy via ketone body (D)-3-hydroxybutyrate. Cell Biosci. 2022, 12, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bobba-Alves, N.; Juster, R.-P.; Picard, M. The energetic cost of allostasis and allostatic load. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2022, 146, 105951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bonilla, D.A.; Cardozo, L.A.; Vélez-Gutiérrez, J.M.; Arévalo-Rodríguez, A.; Vargas-Molina, S.; Stout, J.R.; Kreider, R.B.; Petro, J.L. Exercise selection and common injuries in fitness centers: A systematic integrative review and practical recommendations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bonilla Ocampo, D.A.; Moreno, Y.; Petro, J.L.; Forero, D.A.; Vargas-Molina, S.; Odriozola Martínez, A.; Orozco, C.A.; Stout, J.R.; Rawson, E.S.; Kreider, R.B. A Bioinformatics-Assisted Review on Iron Metabolism and Immune System to Identify Potential Biomarkers of Exercise Stress-Induced Immunosuppression. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Fry, A.C.; Kraemer, W.J. Resistance exercise overtraining and overreaching: Neuroendocrine responses. Sports Med. 1997, 23, 106–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fava, G.A.; McEwen, B.S.; Guidi, J.; Gostoli, S.; Offidani, E.; Sonino, N. Clinical characterization of allostatic overload. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019, 108, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Impellizzeri, F.M.; Marcora, S.M.; Coutts, A.J. Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2019, 14, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Watson, S.L.; Weeks, B.K.; Weis, L.J.; Harding, A.T.; Horan, S.A.; Beck, B.R. High-intensity resistance and impact training improves bone mineral density and physical function in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis: The LIFTMOR randomized controlled trial. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018, 33, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Malorgio, A.; Malorgio, M.; Benedetti, M.; Casarosa, S.; Cannataro, R. High intensity resistance training as intervention method to knee osteoarthritis. Sports Med. Health Sci. 2021, 3, 46–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ferraz, R.B.; Gualano, B.; Rodrigues, R.; Kurimori, C.O.; Fuller, R.; Lima, F.R.; De Sa-Pinto, A.L.; Roschel, H. Benefits of resistance training with blood flow restriction in knee osteoarthritis. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2018, 50, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Cannataro, R.; Carbone, L.; Petro, J.L.; Cione, E.; Vargas, S.; Angulo, H.; Forero, D.A.; Odriozola-Martínez, A.; Kreider, R.B.; Bonilla, D.A. Sarcopenia: Etiology, nutritional approaches, and miRNAs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Cannataro, R.; Cione, E.; Bonilla, D.A.; Cerullo, G.; Angelini, F.; D’Antona, G. Strength training in elderly: An useful tool against sarcopenia. Front. Sports Act. Living 2022, 4, 950949. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2022.950949 (accessed on 1 March 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ashtary-Larky, D.; Bagheri, R.; Asbaghi, O.; Tinsley, G.M.; Kooti, W.; Abbasnezhad, A.; Afrisham, R.; Wong, A. Effects of resistance training combined with a ketogenic diet on body composition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 5717–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Cannataro, R.; Cione, E.; Gallelli, L.; Marzullo, N.; Bonilla, D.A. Acute effects of supervised making weight on health markers, hormones and body composition in muay thai fighters. Sports 2020, 8, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Fromentin, C.; Tomé, D.; Nau, F.; Flet, L.; Luengo, C.; Azzout-Marniche, D.; Sanders, P.; Fromentin, G.; Gaudichon, C. Dietary proteins contribute little to glucose production, even under optimal gluconeogenic conditions in healthy humans. Diabetes 2013, 62, 1435–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bonilla, D.A.; Pérez-Idárraga, A.; Odriozola-Martínez, A.; Kreider, R.B. The 4r’s framework of nutritional strategies for post-exercise recovery: A review with emphasis on new generation of carbohydrates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Harvey, K.L.; Holcomb, L.E.; Kolwicz Jr, S.C. Ketogenic diets and exercise performance. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Slater, G.; Phillips, S.M. Nutrition guidelines for strength sports: Sprinting, weightlifting, throwing events, and bodybuilding. In Food, Nutrition and Sports Performance III; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 67–77. [Google Scholar]
  87. Valenzuela, P.L.; Castillo-García, A.; Lucia, A.; Naclerio, F. Effects of combining a ketogenic diet with resistance training on body composition, strength, and mechanical power in trained individuals: A narrative review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Vargas-Molina, S.; Gómez-Urquiza, J.L.; García-Romero, J.; Benítez-Porres, J. Effects of the ketogenic diet on muscle hypertrophy in resistance-trained men and women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Paoli, A.; Cancellara, P.; Pompei, P.; Moro, T. Ketogenic diet and skeletal muscle hypertrophy: A frenemy relationship? J. Hum. Kinet. 2019, 68, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Paoli, A.; Cenci, L.; Pompei, P.; Sahin, N.; Bianco, A.; Neri, M.; Caprio, M.; Moro, T. Effects of two months of very low carbohydrate ketogenic diet on body composition, muscle strength, muscle area, and blood parameters in competitive natural body builders. Nutrients 2021, 13, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Koerich, A.C.C.; Borszcz, F.K.; Thives Mello, A.; de Lucas, R.D.; Hansen, F. Effects of the ketogenic diet on performance and body composition in athletes and trained adults: A systematic review and Bayesian multivariate multilevel meta-analysis and meta-regression. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 11399–11424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Vargas-Molina, S.; García-Sillero, M.; Bonilla, D.A.; Petro, J.L.; García-Romero, J.; Benítez-Porres, J. The effect of the ketogenic diet on resistance training load management: A repeated-measures clinical trial in trained participants. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2024, 21, 2306308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. LaFountain, R.A.; Miller, V.J.; Barnhart, E.C.; Hyde, P.N.; Crabtree, C.D.; McSwiney, F.T.; Beeler, M.K.; Buga, A.; Sapper, T.N.; Short, J.A. Extended ketogenic diet and physical training intervention in military personnel. Mil. Med. 2019, 184, e538–e547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kephart, W.C.; Pledge, C.D.; Roberson, P.A.; Mumford, P.W.; Romero, M.A.; Mobley, C.B.; Martin, J.S.; Young, K.C.; Lowery, R.P.; Wilson, J.M. The three-month effects of a ketogenic diet on body composition, blood parameters, and performance metrics in CrossFit trainees: A pilot study. Sports 2018, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gregory, R.M.; Hamdan, H.; Torisky, D.M.; Akers, J.D. A low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet combined with 6-weeks of crossfit training improves body composition and performance. Int. J. Sports Exerc. Med. 2017, 3, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. McGaugh, E.; Barthel, B. A review of ketogenic diet and lifestyle. Mo. Med. 2022, 119, 84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Council. 2023 Food and Health Survey International Food Information Council. Available online: https://foodinsight.org/2023-food-and-health-survey/ (accessed on 23 May 2024).
  98. Tomita, I.; Tsuruta, H.; Yasuda-Yamahara, M.; Yamahara, K.; Kuwagata, S.; Tanaka-Sasaki, Y.; Chin-Kanasaki, M.; Fujita, Y.; Nishi, E.; Katagiri, H. Ketone bodies: A double-edged sword for mammalian life span. Aging Cell 2023, 22, e13833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Ye, F.; Li, X.-J.; Jiang, W.-L.; Sun, H.-B.; Liu, J. Efficacy of and patient compliance with a ketogenic diet in adults with intractable epilepsy: A meta-analysis. J. Clin. Neurol. 2015, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Verde, L.; Camajani, E.; Annunziata, G.; Sojat, A.; Marina, L.V.; Colao, A.; Caprio, M.; Muscogiuri, G.; Barrea, L. Ketogenic Diet: A Nutritional Therapeutic Tool for Lipedema? Curr. Obes. Rep. 2023, 12, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Sørlie, V.; De Soysa, A.K.; Hyldmo, A.A.; Retterstøl, K.; Martins, C.; Nymo, S. Effect of a ketogenic diet on pain and quality of life in patients with lipedema: The LIPODIET pilot study. Obes. Sci. Pract. 2022, 8, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Sandu, C.; Burloiu, C.M.; Barca, D.G.; Magureanu, S.A.; Craiu, D.C. Ketogenic diet in patients with GLUT1 deficiency syndrome. Maedica 2019, 14, 93. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Khalid, K.; Apparow, S.; Mushaddik, I.L.; Anuar, A.; Rizvi, S.A.A.; Habib, A. Effects of Ketogenic Diet on Reproductive Hormones in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J. Endocr. Soc. 2023, 7, bvad112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bonilla, D.A.; Kreider, R.B.; Stout, J.R.; Forero, D.A.; Kerksick, C.M.; Roberts, M.D.; Rawson, E.S. Metabolic basis of creatine in health and disease: A bioinformatics-assisted review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kreider, R.B.; Stout, J.R. Creatine in health and disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Cerullo, G.; Negro, M.; Parimbelli, M.; Pecoraro, M.; Perna, S.; Liguori, G.; Rondanelli, M.; Cena, H.; D’Antona, G. The long history of vitamin C: From alleged prevention of the common cold to perspectives investigation to counter COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 54029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Martinez-Negrin, G.; Acton, J.P.; Cocksedge, S.P.; Bailey, S.J.; Clifford, T. The effect of dietary (poly) phenols on exercise-induced physiological adaptations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human intervention trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 2872–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Li, S.; Du, Y.; Meireles, C.; Sharma, K.; Qi, L.; Castillo, A.; Wang, J. Adherence to ketogenic diet in lifestyle interventions in adults with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes: A scoping review. Nutr. Diabetes 2023, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Beese, S.; Postma, J.; Graves, J.M. Allostatic load measurement: A systematic review of reviews, database inventory, and considerations for neighborhood research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 17006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Lin, T.-Y.; Chueh, T.-Y.; Hung, T.-M. Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance Exercise Studies (PRIRES): A checklist developed using an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Sports Med. 2023, 9, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Scheme of cell during ketogenic diet vs normal diet: (A) Increase in ketone body level as a result of fatty acid oxidation, thus enhancing level of acetyl-CoA in mitochondria to compensate for the ATP needed. (B) Glucose is fully oxidized through glycolysis followed by the mitochondrial Krebs cycle coupled to oxidative phosphorylation. Created with BioRender.
Figure 1. Scheme of cell during ketogenic diet vs normal diet: (A) Increase in ketone body level as a result of fatty acid oxidation, thus enhancing level of acetyl-CoA in mitochondria to compensate for the ATP needed. (B) Glucose is fully oxidized through glycolysis followed by the mitochondrial Krebs cycle coupled to oxidative phosphorylation. Created with BioRender.
Applsci 14 05445 g001
Figure 2. Skeletal muscle signaling pathways activated after mechanical loading. (Source: the authors are using the software at BioRender.com accessed on 1 January 2024).
Figure 2. Skeletal muscle signaling pathways activated after mechanical loading. (Source: the authors are using the software at BioRender.com accessed on 1 January 2024).
Applsci 14 05445 g002
Table 1. Clinical use of the ketogenic diet and the side effects in the short term and the long term.
Table 1. Clinical use of the ketogenic diet and the side effects in the short term and the long term.
Disorder TypeDiseaseNon-Desired EffectsReferences
Short term
Neurological disease Refractory epilepsyNausea and vomiting
Constipation
Dehydration
Anorexia
Lethargy
Hypoglycaemia
[29]
Myoclonic–astatic epilepsy[30]
Parkinson’s disease[31]
Alzheimer’s disease[32]
Multiple sclerosis[33]
Migraine[34]
Depression[35]
Autism[36]
Long term
Endocrine disordersDiabetes [37]
Obesity and Lipedema Abnormalities of lipid metabolism
Hepatic steatosis
Hypoproteinaemia
Mineral deficiencies
Myocardiopathy
Nephrolithiasis
[16]
Metabolic syndrome[38]
PCOS[39]
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease[40]
Metabolic disordersGlucose transporter type 1 deficiency[41]
Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency[42]
Phosphofructokinase deficiency[43]
Table 2. The impact of physiological ketosis on metabolic profile.
Table 2. The impact of physiological ketosis on metabolic profile.
MarkersKDICKDVLCKDVLCKD + Exercise
HbA1cDecreaseNRDecreaseNR
TGDecreaseNo changesDecreaseDecrease
HDLIncreaseNo changesNo changesIncrease
LDLDecreaseIncreaseNo changesDecrease
Total cholesterolNRIncreaseNRDecrease
Fasting glucoseDecreaseDecreaseDecreaseDecrease
InsulinNRDecreaseNRDecrease
NR: Not Reported.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cannataro, R.; Petro, J.L.; Abrego-Guandique, D.M.; Cione, E.; Caroleo, M.C.; Kreider, R.B.; Bonilla, D.A. Ketogenic Diet Plus Resistance Training Applied to Physio-Pathological Conditions: A Brief Review. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 5445. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135445

AMA Style

Cannataro R, Petro JL, Abrego-Guandique DM, Cione E, Caroleo MC, Kreider RB, Bonilla DA. Ketogenic Diet Plus Resistance Training Applied to Physio-Pathological Conditions: A Brief Review. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(13):5445. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cannataro, Roberto, Jorge Luis Petro, Diana Marisol Abrego-Guandique, Erika Cione, Maria Cristina Caroleo, Richard B. Kreider, and Diego A. Bonilla. 2024. "Ketogenic Diet Plus Resistance Training Applied to Physio-Pathological Conditions: A Brief Review" Applied Sciences 14, no. 13: 5445. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop