Blockchain-Driven Food Supply Chains: A Systematic Review for Unexplored Opportunities
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Background
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Search Strategy
3.2. Inclusion Criteria
3.3. Analysis of Concepts
- A comprehensive review of each keyword was conducted by thoroughly examining all references associated with that keyword.
- Furthermore, only those references were included in the final count that explicitly cited the keyword as a driver for implementing Blockchain in the food supply chain.
4. Findings
4.1. Drivers of Blockchain Technology in the Food Supply Chain
- Donation and redistribution;
- Supply chain financing;
- Animal welfare;
- Food waste;
- Data analysis;
- Environmental and food sustainability;
- Accurate, authentic, reliable, secure, and trustworthy data;
- Automation and reduction in intermediaries;
- Cost-cutting, improved efficiencies, and reduction in frauds;
- Verifiability, auditability, accountability, and provenance;
- Food safety and quality;
Frequency and Content Analysis of Identified Abundantly Applied Drivers | ||
---|---|---|
Total # of Blockchain-based food supply chain (FSC) framework publications investigated | 60 | |
Accurate, authentic, reliable, secure, and trustworthy data | # of publications discussing the usefulness of Blockchain for accurate, authentic, reliable, secure, and trustworthy data in the FSCs. | 60 |
Traceability, transparency, tracking and monitoring | # of publications discussing the usefulness of Blockchain for Traceability, transparency, tracking and monitoring in the FSCs. | 53 |
Cost cutting, improved efficiencies, and reduced frauds in the food supply chain | # of publications discussing the usefulness of Blockchain for cost-cutting, improved efficiencies, and reduction in frauds in the FSCs. | 43 |
Automation and reduction in intermediaries | # of publications discussing the usefulness of Blockchain for automation and reduction in intermediaries in the food supply chain FSCs. | 32 |
Verifiability, auditability, accountability, and provenance | # of publications discussing the usefulness of Blockchain for verifiability, auditability, accountability and provenance in the food supply chain FSCs. | 28 |
Food safety and quality in the food supply chain | # of publications discussing the usefulness of Blockchain for food safety &and quality in the food supply chain FSCs. | 27 |
Environmental and food sustainability | # of publications discussing the usefulness of Blockchain for Environmental and food sustainability in the FSCs. | 21 |
Frequency and Content Analysis of Scarcely Applied Drivers | ||
---|---|---|
Total # of Blockchain-based food supply chain (FSC) framework publications investigated | 60 | |
Donation and Redistribution | # of publications discussing “Donation or Redistribution” as a driver of Blockchain in the FSCs. | 2 |
Supply Chain Financing | # of publications discussing “Supply Chain Financing” as a driver of Blockchain in the FSCs. | 3 |
Animal Welfare | # of publications discussing “Animal Welfare” quoted as a driver for Blockchain in the FSCs. | 3 |
Food Waste | # of publications discussing “Food waste” as a driver of Blockchain in the FSCs. | 4 |
Data Analysis | # of publications discussing “Data Analysis” as a driver of Blockchain in the FSCs. | 6 |
4.2. Significance of Underutilized Drivers of Blockchain Technology in the Food Supply Chain
- Significance of Transparent Donation and Redistribution
- Significance of Food Waste
- Significance of Supply Chain Finance
- Significance of Animal Welfare
5. Discussion
5.1. Most Common Drivers for the Application of Blockchain Technology in the Food Supply Chains
- Accurate, authentic, reliable, secure, and trustworthy data
- Automation and reduction in intermediaries
- Improved traceability, transparency, tracking, monitoring, and response times
- Verifiability, Auditability, Accountability and Provenance
- Cost cutting, improved efficiencies, and reduction in frauds in the food supply chain
- Food safety and quality
- Environmental and food sustainability
5.2. Scarce Drivers for the Application of Blockchain Technology in Food Supply Chains
- Donation and redistribution
- Supply Chain Financing
- Improved Animal Welfare
- Food Waste
- Data analysis
6. A Framework for Blockchain-Driven Food Supply Chain
- A.
- Data Integrity and Trust;
- B.
- Operational Efficiency;
- C.
- Sustainability and Safety;
- D.
- Social Sustainability and Safety Management.
6.1. A. Data Integrity and Trust in the Food Supply Chain
6.1.1. Accurate, Authentic, Reliable, Secure, and Trustworthy Data
- Context: The food supply chain involves multiple stakeholders, including farmers, processors, distributors, retailers, and consumers. Ensuring data integrity at every stage is vital to prevent fraud, mislabeling, and safety issues. Blockchain’s immutable ledger provides a permanent, tamper-proof record of each transaction and movement of goods.
- Impact: This guarantees that information on the origin, quality, and safety of food products is accurate and reliable, enhancing consumer trust and compliance with regulatory standards.
6.1.2. Verifiability, Auditability, Accountability, and Provenance
- Context: In the food supply chain, tracking the origin and journey of food products is crucial for maintaining food safety and quality. Blockchain technology enables a verifiable chain of custody, allowing participants to trace every transaction and change in ownership or handling.
- Impact: This transparency ensures that food provenance is indisputable, giving consumers confidence in the products they purchase and allowing businesses to quickly trace and resolve issues such as contamination or mislabeling.
6.1.3. Data Analysis
- Context: Real-time data collected from every step in the supply chain provide actionable insights that help optimize processes and improve decision-making. For instance, data on product movement can help identify bottlenecks or inefficiencies in the distribution process.
- Impact: Enhanced data analysis leads to better demand forecasting, inventory management, and resource allocation, ultimately reducing waste and improving supply chain performance.
6.2. B. Operational Efficiency in the Food Supply Chain
6.2.1. Automation and Reduction in Intermediaries
- Context: The food supply chain often involves numerous intermediaries, such as brokers and third-party auditors, which can slow down transactions and increase costs. Blockchain, through smart contracts, automates these processes by executing predefined agreements without manual intervention.
- Impact: This automation speeds up transactions, reduces administrative costs, and eliminates the need for intermediaries, allowing food products to move more quickly from farm to table.
6.2.2. Cost Cutting, Improved Efficiencies, and Reduction in Fraud
- Context: Fraud in the food supply chain, such as counterfeit products or false labeling, can harm consumer trust and result in financial losses. Blockchain’s transparent and traceable nature minimizes the risk of fraud, while also reducing redundancies in record-keeping and auditing.
- Impact: Lowering the cost of operations and reducing fraud leads to increased profitability for producers and more consistent product quality for consumers.
6.2.3. Supply Chain Financing
- Context: Small and medium-sized food producers often face challenges in securing financing due to the lack of transparency in traditional supply chains. With Blockchain, verified transactions serve as proof of business activities, which can be used as collateral for securing loans or credit.
- Impact: Improved access to financing helps producers and suppliers manage cash flow more effectively, enabling them to grow their businesses and invest in sustainable practices.
6.3. C. Sustainability and Safety in the Food Supply Chain
6.3.1. Improved Traceability, Transparency, Tracking, Monitoring, and Response Times
- Context: Traceability is critical in the food supply chain for monitoring the movement of goods, ensuring that perishable products are stored and transported under proper conditions, and quickly identifying sources of contamination. Blockchain provides real-time tracking and monitoring, making it easier to manage recalls and address food safety concerns.
- Impact: Faster response times to safety issues or contamination events protect consumers and help companies avoid costly product recalls or reputational damage.
6.3.2. Food Safety and Quality
- Context: Ensuring food safety is a top priority in the supply chain, particularly for perishable and high-risk products such as meat, seafood, and dairy. Blockchain technology can monitor key variables such as temperature, humidity, and handling conditions, ensuring that safety standards are maintained.
- Impact: By tracking the conditions under which food is stored and transported, a Blockchain helps prevent spoilage, contamination, and foodborne illnesses, ensuring that only safe, high-quality products reach consumers.
6.3.3. Environmental and FOOD Sustainability
- Context: Sustainability is increasingly important in the food industry, as consumers demand more environmentally responsible sourcing practices. Blockchain technology can track the environmental impact of production processes, including carbon footprints, water usage, and resource management.
- Impact: This promotes transparency and accountability, allowing stakeholders to make informed decisions that minimize environmental harm and support long-term sustainability goals.
6.4. D. Social Impact and Waste Management in the Food Supply Chain
6.4.1. Donation and Redistribution
- Context: Food waste is a major issue in the global food supply chain. A Blockchain can track expiration dates, surplus inventory, and locations of excess food, facilitating the redistribution of food to charities and food banks before it spoils.
- Impact: By ensuring that surplus food is properly managed and redistributed, a Blockchain helps reduce food waste and ensures that food is used to feed those in need rather than ending up in landfills.
6.4.2. Improved Animal Welfare
- Context: Animal welfare is a growing concern for consumers, who want assurances that livestock are raised and handled humanely. A Blockchain enables the tracking of animal conditions, ensuring compliance with welfare standards throughout the supply chain.
- Impact: With transparent data on the conditions in which animals are raised, businesses can demonstrate their commitment to ethical practices, and consumers can make more informed choices about the products they purchase.
6.4.3. Food Waste
- Context: One of the major inefficiencies in the food supply chain is the amount of food that goes to waste due to poor inventory management, inadequate tracking, or delays in distribution. Blockchain technology optimizes inventory and transportation management, reducing the likelihood of food being spoiled or discarded.
- Impact: By improving efficiency and reducing waste, Blockchain technology helps the food supply chain become more sustainable, reduces costs for businesses, and ensures that more food reaches consumers.
7. Limitations
8. Future Directions
9. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Folkerts, H.; Koehorst, H. Challenges in international food supply chains: Vertical co-ordination in the European agribusiness and food industries. Br. Food J. 1998, 100, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casino, F.; Kanakaris, V.; Dasaklis, T.K.; Moschuris, S.; Rachaniotis, N.P. Modeling food supply chain traceability based on blockchain technology. Ifac-Papersonline 2019, 52, 2728–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kayikci, Y.; Durak Usar, D.; Aylak, B.L. Using Blockchain technology to drive operational excellence in perishable food supply chains during outbreaks. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2022, 33, 836–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, A.; Bailey, K. Blockchain in food traceability: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2021 32nd Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), Athlone, Ireland, 10–11 June 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Subashini, B.; Hemavathi, D. Detecting the Traceability Issues in Supply chain Industries using Blockchain Technology. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI), Chennai, India, 28–29 January 2022; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Aung, M.M.; Chang, Y.S. Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control 2014, 39, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarpong, S. Traceability and supply chain complexity: Confronting the issues and concerns. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tipmontian, J.; Alcover, J.C.; Rajmohan, M. Impact of Blockchain adoption for safe food supply chain management through system dynamics approach from management perspectives in Thailand. Multidiscip. Digit. Publ. Inst. Proc. 2020, 39, 14. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammed, A.; Potdar, V.; Quaddus, M.; Hui, W. Blockchain Adoption in Food Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review on Enablers, Benefits, and Barriers. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 14236–14255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dos Santos, R.B.; Torrisi, N.M.; Pantoni, R.P. Third party certification of agri-food supply chain using smart contracts and Blockchain tokens. Sensors 2021, 21, 5307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandan, A.; John, M.; Potdar, V. Achieving UN SDGs in Food Supply Chain Using Blockchain Technology. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahid, A.; Almogren, A.; Javaid, N.; Al-Zahrani, F.A.; Zuair, M.; Alam, M. Blockchain-based agri-food supply chain: A complete solution. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 69230–69243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, A.; Chai, Y. Blockchain and IoT based food traceability for smart agriculture. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering, Singapore, 28–31 July 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, H.; Wang, X.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. Applying Blockchain technology to improve agri-food traceability: A review of development methods, benefits and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 121031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, H. An overview of Blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress), Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 June 2017; pp. 557–564. [Google Scholar]
- Malik, S.; Dedeoglu, V.; Kanhere, S.S.; Jurdak, R. Trustchain: Trust management in Blockchain and iot supported supply chains. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), Atlanta, GA, USA, 14–17 July 2019; pp. 184–193. [Google Scholar]
- Yadav, V.S.; Singh, A.R. A systematic literature review of blockchain technology in agriculture. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Toronto, ON, Canada, 23–25 October 2019; IEOM Society International: Southfield, MI, USA, 2019; pp. 973–981. [Google Scholar]
- Kamath, R. Food traceability on blockchain: Walmart’s pork and mango pilots with IBM. J. Br. Blockchain Assoc. 2018, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wolfson, R. Albertsons Joins IBM Food Trust Blockchain Network to Track Romaine Lettuce from Farm to Store. 2019. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelwolfson/2019/04/11/albertsons-joins-ibm-food-trust-Blockchain-network-totrack-romaine-lettuce-from-farm-to-store/ (accessed on 12 September 2023).
- Galvez, J.F.; Mejuto, J.C.; Simal-Gandara, J. Future challenges on the use of Blockchain for food traceability analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 107, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kshetri, N. Blockchain and the economics of food safety. IT Prof. 2019, 21, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Han, J.H.; Beynon-Davies, P. Understanding Blockchain technology for future supply chains: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2019, 24, 62–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bermeo-Almeida, O.; Cardenas-Rodriguez, M.; Samaniego-Cobo, T.; Ferruzola-Gómez, E.; Cabezas-Cabezas, R.; Bazán-Vera, W. Blockchain in agriculture: A systematic literature review. In Technologies and Innovation: 4th International Conference, CITI 2018, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 6–9 November 2018, Proceedings 4; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 44–56. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, G.; Liu, S.; Lopez, C.; Lu, H.; Elgueta, S.; Chen, H.; Boshkoska, B.M. Blockchain technology in agri-food value chain management: A synthesis of applications, challenges, and future research directions. Comput. Ind. 2019, 109, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pena, M.; Llivisaca, J.; Siguenza-Guzman, L. Blockchain and its potential applications in food supply chain management in Ecuador. In Blockchain: Applications and Use Cases; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Zailani, S.; Treiblmaier, H.; Rejeb, K. Blockchain technology in the food industry: A review of potentials, challenges and future research directions. Logistics 2020, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morella, P.; Lambán, M.P.; Royo, J.; Sánchez, J.C. Study and analysis of the implementation of 4.0 technologies in the agri-food supply chain: A state of the art. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Liu, X.; Yan, J.; Hu, G.; Shi, Y. Processes, benefits, and challenges for adoption of Blockchain technologies in food supply chains: A thematic analysis. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 2021, 19, 909–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurgazina, J.; Pakdeetrakulwong, U.; Moser, T.; Reiner, G. Distributed ledger technology applications in food supply chains: A review of challenges and future research directions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha GD, S.R.; de Oliveira, L.; Talamini, E. Blockchain applications in agribusiness: A systematic review. Future Internet 2021, 13, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, R.L.; Tricase, C.; De Cesare, L. Blockchain technology for a sustainable agri-food supply chain. Br. Food J. 2021, 123, 3471–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dadi, V.; Nikhil, S.R.; Mor, R.S.; Agarwal, T.; Arora, S. Agri-food 4.0 and innovations: Revamping the supply chain operations. Prod. Eng. Arch. 2021, 27, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, N.; Ghadge, A.; Bourlakis, M. Blockchain adoption in food supply chains: A review and implementation framework. Prod. Plan. Control. 2023, 34, 506–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, A.; Dashora, K. Application of Blockchain technology for agrifood supply chain management: A systematic literature review on benefits and challenges. Benchmarking Int. J. 2022, 29, 3426–3442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vistro, D.M.; Rehman, A.U.; Farooq, M.S.; Khalid, F. Role of Blockchain Technology in Agriculture Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 2nd Mysore Sub Section International Conference (MysuruCon), Mysuru, India, 16–17 October 2022; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Saha, A.S.; Raut, R.D.; Yadav, V.S.; Majumdar, A. Blockchain Changing the Outlook of the Sustainable Food Supply Chain to Achieve Net Zero? Sustainability 2022, 14, 16916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali Taş, M.A.; Aylak, B.L. Investigation of Blockchain technology integration within food supply chain management. Smart Sustain. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 6, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Lu, Q.; Zhu, L.; Paik, H.Y.; Staples, M. A systematic literature review on blockchain governance. J. Syst. Softw. 2023, 197, 111576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, P.; Zhang, L.; You, S.; Van Fan, Y.; Tan, R.R.; Klemeš, J.J.; You, F. Blockchain technology applications in waste management: Overview, challenges and opportunities. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 421, 138466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ioannidis, J.P. Systematic reviews for basic scientists: A different beast. Physiol. Rev. 2023, 103, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pollock, A.; Berge, E. How to do a systematic review. Int. J. Stroke 2018, 13, 138–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kitchenham, B.; Charters, S. Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. In EBSE Technical Report; Software Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University, Department of Computer Science, University of Durham: Durham, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food Security and Nutrition around the World. 2023. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/cc3017en/online/state-food-security-and-nutrition-2023/food-security-nutrition-indicators.html (accessed on 23 October 2023).
- Dey, S.; Saha, S.; Singh, A.K.; McDonald-Maier, K. SmartNoshWaste: Using blockchain, machine learning, cloud computing and QR code to reduce food waste in decentralized web 3.0 enabled smart cities. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Food Progamme’s (WFP). War in Ukraine: How a Humanitarian Tragedy Fed a Global Hunger Crisis. 2023. Available online: https://www.wfp.org/stories/war-ukraine-how-humanitarian-tragedy-fed-global-hunger-crisis (accessed on 5 November 2023).
- Global Blockchain Business Council. UN World Food Programme Innovation Accelerator and Global Blockchain Business Council Launch Initiative to Combat Global Hunger Using Blockchain Technology. AccessWire. 27 September 2024. Available online: https://www.accesswire.com/783300/un-world-food-programme-innovation-accelerator-and-global-blockchain-business-council-launch-initiative-to-combat-global-hunger-using-blockchain-technology (accessed on 7 October 2023).
- UN World Food Programme (WFP). Building Blocks—Blockchain Network for Humanitarian Assistance—Graduated Project. 2023. Available online: https://innovation.wfp.org/project/building-blocks (accessed on 7 October 2023).
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of Food and Agriculture. 2019. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/ca6030en/ca6030en.pdf (accessed on 27 November 2023).
- Mbow, C.; Rosenzweig, C.; Barioni, L.G.; Benton, T.G.; Herrero, M.; Krishnapillai, M.; Liwenga, E.; Pradhan, P.; Rivera-Ferre, M.G.; Sapkota, T.; et al. Food Security. In Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems Food security (No. GSFC-E-DAA-TN78913); IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esben, H.; Shalini, U.; Matias, P.; Björg, A.; Marine, G.; Tackling the 1.6-Billion-Ton Food Loss and Waste Crisis. Staff Article, Boston Consulting Group with Food Nation and State of Green. 2018. Available online: www.bcg.com/publications/2018/tackling-1.6-billion-ton-food-loss-and-waste-crisis (accessed on 17 November 2023).
- IBM. 7 Benefits of IBM Food Trust. 2023. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/Blockchain/resources/7-benefits-ibm-food-trust/ (accessed on 7 September 2023).
- IBM. EMPACT Connecting Youth to the Digital Economy—Graduated Project. 2023. Available online: https://innovation.wfp.org/project/empact (accessed on 10 November 2023).
- Cornish, A.; Raubenheimer, D.; McGreevy, P. What we know about the public’s level of concern for farm animal welfare in food production in developed countries. Animals 2016, 6, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coleman, G.J.; Hemsworth, P.H.; Hay, M.; Cox, M. Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 66, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kauppinen, T.; Vesala, K.M.; Valros, A. Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters. Livest. Sci. 2012, 143, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kauppinen, T.; Vainio, A.; Valros, A.; Rita, H.; Vesala, K.M. Improving animal welfare: Qualitative and quantitative methodology in the study of farmers’ attitudes. Anim. Welf. 2010, 19, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemsworth, P.H.; Coleman, G.J.; Barnett, J.L. Improving the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behaviour and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994, 39, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertenshaw, C.; Rowlinson, P. Exploring stock managers’ perceptions of the human—Animal relationship on dairy farms and an association with milk production. Anthrozoös 2009, 22, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schillings, J.; Bennett, R.; Wemelsfelder, F.; Rose, D.C. Digital Livestock Technologies as boundary objects: Investigating impacts on farm management and animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 2023, 32, e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salah, K.; Nizamuddin, N.; Jayaraman, R.; Omar, M. Blockchain-based soybean traceability in agricultural supply chain. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 73295–73305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsikouli, P.; Wilde, A.S.; Dragoni, N.; Høgh-Jensen, H. On the benefits and challenges of blockchains for managing food supply chains. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 2175–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, K.; Lee, J.Y.; Gharehgozli, A. Blockchain in food supply chains: A literature review and synthesis analysis of platforms, benefits and challenges. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 61, 3527–3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Hilton, B.; Burks, Z.; Reyes, J. Integrating Blockchain, smart contract-tokens, and IoT to design a food traceability solution. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 9th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–3 November 2018; pp. 335–340. [Google Scholar]
- Friedman, N.; Ormiston, J. Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 175, 121403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rejeb, A.; Rejeb, K. Blockchain and supply chain sustainability. Logforum 2020, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamilaris, A.; Fonts, A.; Prenafeta-Boldύ, F.X. The rise of Blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 91, 640–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, D.; Hao, Z.; Wang, F.; Li, H. Novel automatic food trading system using consortium Blockchain. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2019, 44, 3439–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jdey, I. Trusted Smart Irrigation System Based on Fuzzy IoT and Blockchain. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing, Sevilla, Spain, 29 November–2 December 2022; pp. 154–165. [Google Scholar]
- Creydt, M.; Fischer, M. Blockchain and more-Algorithm driven food traceability. Food Control 2019, 105, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, M.; Feng, P. A food traceability system based on Blockchain and radio frequency identification technologies. J. Comput. Commun. 2020, 8, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, A.; Singh, G.; Kukreja, V.; Sharma, S.; Singh, S.; Yoon, B. Adaptation of IoT with Blockchain in Food Supply Chain Management: An analysis-based review in development, benefits and potential applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 8174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouzembrak, Y.; Klüche, M.; Gavai, A.; Marvin, H.J. Internet of Things in food safety: Literature review and a bibliometric analysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 94, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baralla, G.; Pinna, A.; Tonelli, R.; Marchesi, M.; Ibba, S. Ensuring transparency and traceability of food local products: A Blockchain application to a Smart Tourism Region. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2021, 33, e5857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Dabipi, I.K.; Brown, W.L., Jr. Internet of Things applications for agriculture. Internet Things A Z Technol. Appl. 2018, 507–528. [Google Scholar]
- Lei, M.; Liu, S.; Luo, N.; Yang, X.; Sun, C. Trusted-auditing chain: A security Blockchain prototype used in agriculture traceability. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pakseresht, A.; Yavari, A.; Kaliji, S.A.; Hakelius, K. The intersection of Blockchain technology and circular economy in the agri-food sector. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 35, 260–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pooja, S.; Mundada, M.R. Analysis of agricultural supply chain management for traceability of food products using Blockchain-ethereum technology. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER), Udupi, India, 30–31 October 2020; pp. 127–132. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J.; Guo, S.; Xie, D.; Yan, Y. Blockchain: A new safeguard for agri-foods. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2020, 4, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mezquita, Y.; González-Briones, A.; Casado-Vara, R.; Chamoso, P.; Prieto, J.; Corchado, J.M. Blockchain-based architecture: A mas proposal for efficient agri-food supply chains. In Ambient Intelligence–Software and Applications–10th International Symposium on Ambient Intelligence; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 89–96. [Google Scholar]
- Bumblauskas, D.; Mann, A.; Dugan, B.; Rittmer, J. A Blockchain use case in food distribution: Do you know where your food has been? Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52, 102008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saurabh, S.; Dey, K. Blockchain technology adoption, architecture, and sustainable agri-food supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 284, 124731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allena, M. Blockchain technology for environmental compliance. Environ. Law 2020, 50, 1055–1103. [Google Scholar]
- UN. Goal 2: Zero Hunger. 2023. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/hunger/ (accessed on 7 October 2023).
- IPC. GAZA STRIP: Hostilities Leave the Entire Population Highly Food Insecure and at Risk of Famine. 2023. Available online: https://www.ipcinfo.org/ipcinfo-website/alerts-archive/issue-94/en/ (accessed on 27 October 2023).
- Bastagli, F.; Hagen-Zanker, J.; Harman, L.; Barca, V.; Sturge, G.; Schmidt, T.; Pellerano, L. Cash transfers: What does the evidence say. In A Rigorous Review of Programme Impact and the Role of Design and Implementation Features; ODI: London, UK, 2016; Volume 1, p. 1. [Google Scholar]
- Sirisha, N.S.; Agarwal, T.; Monde, R.; Yadav, R.; Hande, R. Proposed solution for trackable donations using blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE), Navi Mumbai, India, 4–5 January 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Elavarasan, M.S.; Nesakumar, C.D. Food wastage reduction mobile application. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput. 2019, 8. [Google Scholar]
- Krishnan, V.G.; Dhathanamoorthy, V.; Karan, P.; Kishore, N.J. Prevention of Food Wastage Using Mobile Application. Int. J. Scientific Res. Eng. Trends 2020, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Junfithrana, A.P.; Liani, E.; Suwono, M.Z.; Meldiana, D.; Suryana, A. Rice donation system in orphanage based on internet of things, raspberry-pi, and blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED), Bangkok, Thailand, 6–8 September 2018; pp. 235–238. [Google Scholar]
- Kshetri, N. Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South? Third World Q. 2017, 38, 1710–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdani, L. Zakat blockchain: A descriptive qualitative approach. EkBis J. Ekon. Dan Bisnis 2020, 4, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rejeb, D. Blockchain and smart contract application for Zakat institution. Int. J. Zakat 2020, 5, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caniato, F.; Gelsomino, L.M.; Perego, A.; Ronchi, S. Does finance solve the supply chain financing problem? Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2016, 21, 534–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moretto, A.; Grassi, L.; Caniato, F.; Giorgino, M.; Ronchi, S. Supply chain finance: From traditional to supply chain credit rating. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2019, 25, 197–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, F.; Blome, C.; Sun, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhi, B. Towards an integrated conceptual framework of supply chain finance: An information processing perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 219, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caniato, F.; Henke, M.; Zsidisin, G.A. Supply chain finance: Historical foundations, current research, future developments. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 2019, 25, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y. New model of food supply chain finance based on the Internet of Things and blockchain. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2021, 2021, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natanelov, V.; Cao, S.; Foth, M.; Dulleck, U. Blockchain smart contracts for supply chain finance: Mapping the innovation potential in Australia-China beef supply chains. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 30, 100389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kampan, K.; Tsusaka, T.W.; Anal, A.K. Adoption of Blockchain Technology for Enhanced Traceability of Livestock-Based Products. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshehri, M. Blockchain-assisted internet of things framework in smart livestock farming. Internet Things 2023, 22, 100739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangla, S.K.; Kazancoglu, Y.; Ekinci, E.; Liu, M.; Özbiltekin, M.; Sezer, M.D. Using system dynamics to analyze the societal impacts of Blockchain technology in milk supply chainsrefer. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2021, 149, 102289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gehlot, A.; Malik, P.K.; Singh, R.; Akram, S.V.; Alsuwian, T. Dairy 4.0: Intelligent Communication Ecosystem for the Cattle Animal Welfare with Blockchain and IoT Enabled Technologies. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. The state of food and agriculture 2019. In Moving Forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019; pp. 2–13. [Google Scholar]
- CBC. Meet the App Creator Reducing Restaurant Food Waste While Making Dining Affordable. 2019. Available online: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/meet-app-creator-reducing-restaurant-food-waste-while-making-dining-n954661 (accessed on 17 October 2023).
- Daghighi, A.; Shoushtari, F. Toward Sustainability of Supply Chain by Applying Blockchain Technology. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Oper. Res. 2023, 5, 60–72. [Google Scholar]
- Abdullah, N.; Alwesabi, O.A.; Abdullah, R. IoT-based smart waste management system in a smart city. In Recent Trends in Data Science and Soft Computing: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology (IRICT 2018); Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 364–371. [Google Scholar]
- Dubey, S.; Singh, P.; Yadav, P.; Singh, K.K. Household waste management system using IoT and machine learning. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 167, 1950–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yiannas, F. A new era of food transparency powered by blockchain. Innov. Technol. Gov. Glob. 2018, 12, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Gawankar, S.A. Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain: A review for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 219, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhat, S.A.; Huang, N.F.; Sofi, I.B.; Sultan, M. Agriculture-food supply chain management based on Blockchain and IoT: A narrative on enterprise Blockchain interoperability. Agriculture 2021, 12, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhat, S.A.; Huang, N.F. Big data and ai revolution in precision agriculture: Survey and challenges. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 110209–110222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kayikci, Y.; Subramanian, N.; Dora, M.; Bhatia, M.S. Food supply chain in the era of Industry 4.0: Blockchain technology implementation opportunities and impediments from the perspective of people, process, performance, and technology. Prod. Plan. Control. 2022, 33, 301–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogrean, C. Relevance of big data for business and management. Exploratory insights (Part I). Stud. Bus. Econ. 2018, 13, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilie-Zudor, E.; Ekárt, A.; Kemeny, Z.; Buckingham, C.; Welch, P.; Monostori, L. Advanced predictive-analysis-based decision support for collaborative logistics networks. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2015, 20, 369–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Identification | Records identified from Scopus: (n = 1821) | Duplicate records removed (n = 83) |
Records screened. (n = 1738) | 1591 records were eliminated based on the absence of frameworks as indicated by abstract screening | |
Screening | Records sought for retrieval. (n = 147) | Records not retrieved. (n = 0) |
Records assessed for eligibility after thorough review. (n = 122) | 62 Records were excluded because:
| |
Included | Studies included in the review. (n = 60) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ellahi, R.M.; Wood, L.C.; Bekhit, A.E.-D.A. Blockchain-Driven Food Supply Chains: A Systematic Review for Unexplored Opportunities. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8944. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198944
Ellahi RM, Wood LC, Bekhit AE-DA. Blockchain-Driven Food Supply Chains: A Systematic Review for Unexplored Opportunities. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(19):8944. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198944
Chicago/Turabian StyleEllahi, Rizwan Matloob, Lincoln C. Wood, and Alaa Ei-Din A. Bekhit. 2024. "Blockchain-Driven Food Supply Chains: A Systematic Review for Unexplored Opportunities" Applied Sciences 14, no. 19: 8944. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198944
APA StyleEllahi, R. M., Wood, L. C., & Bekhit, A. E.-D. A. (2024). Blockchain-Driven Food Supply Chains: A Systematic Review for Unexplored Opportunities. Applied Sciences, 14(19), 8944. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198944