Next Article in Journal
Modelling the Uptake of 226Ra and 238U Stable Elements in Plants during Summer in the Vicinity of Tailings from an Abandoned Copper Mine
Previous Article in Journal
Luminescent Materials for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Advances and Directions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Endowed Polyphenols in Advanced Delivery Systems for Vaginal Infections

by
Eduardo Apolinário
,
Maria Leonor Castro
,
Manuela Pintado
,
João Paulo Ferreira
,
Sara Baptista-Silva
and
Sandra Borges
*
CBQF—Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina—Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(20), 9203; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209203
Submission received: 20 June 2024 / Revised: 3 October 2024 / Accepted: 6 October 2024 / Published: 10 October 2024

Abstract

:
Vaginal infections (VIs) are the result of the nefarious vaginal polymicrobial universe (i.e., Gardnerella vaginalis, Prevotella spp., Staphylococcus spp., Candida albicans, etc.), the inhabitants of which multiply and infect the surface of the vaginal epithelium, which serves as a scaffold for the adhesion of pathogenic poly-complexes with interactive abilities. VIs affect over 1 billion women per year and have a stunning annual relapse rate of 30%. These conditions impact women’s quality of life and fertility and cause oncogenic Human Papillomavirus (HPV) persistence. VIs are typically treated with oral (i.e., Flagyl®) and localized drug tablets and creams/gels (i.e., Clindesse®), with potential leakage from the vaginal tract upon administration leading to the failure of the treatment. This study intends to highlight polyphenols as potential therapeutic agents in terms of their benefits and limitations and suggest strategies to increase their effectiveness. Polyphenols are natural compounds rich in phenolic structures which have an impact on this type of pathology and deserve the utmost attention from researchers. Natural polyphenols have several advantages: renewability, biodegradability, low environmental impact, biocompatibility, application versatility, bioactive properties, and the potential for sustainable applications. These compounds, formulated in advanced delivery systems, may natively exhibit antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities. The main objective of this review is to highlight the importance of researching new and effective formulations to prevent and treat VIs based on natural, controlled, and sustainable systems.

1. Introduction

The persistence of oncogenic HPV infection contributes to the development of cervical cancer (CC), which is the fourth most common among women, with a 50% mortality rate [1]. Current vaccines may prevent this cancer type. However, they are not accessible to most girls and young women in low- and middle-income countries, and the number of infections is still devastating. Withal, pathophysiological changes in the cervicovaginal microbial communities are HPV-partakers and are largely neglected worldwide. In the vaginal ecosystem, health is associated with low microbial diversity and the prevalence of Lactobacillus species. Vaginal infections (VI) result in pathogenic microbial overgrowth, such as Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium spp., and Prevotella spp., species also closely related to multiple sexually transmitted infections (STI) (i.e., HPV, herpes, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [2].
Polyphenols are bioactive compounds derived from plants which have multiple functional properties, making them extremely valuable in pharmacology [3]. Particularly, in VIs, the impact of polyphenols is striking. This is related to the following vital biological properties: (i) antimicrobial properties, since these compounds may help inhibit the growth and adherence of harmful bacteria in the vaginal environment; (ii) anti-inflammatory properties, which may help modulate the inflammatory process, potentially reducing symptoms associated with VIs; (iii) vaginal microbiota modulation, since polyphenols may influence the composition of the vaginal microbiota by promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria and inhibiting the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria, which could contribute to restoring a healthier balance in the vaginal microbiota; (iv) immunomodulatory effects, which may contribute to a more effective immune response against bacterial infections, including those associated with VIs [4]; and (v) the prevention of biofilm formation, which may interfere with the formation of bacterial biofilms. Biofilms can protect bacteria from antibiotics and the immune system, so inhibiting their formation may enhance the effectiveness of VI treatments [5]. In recent years, there has been a growing focus on the properties and extraction methods of certain molecules that can be used as safe and cost-effective alternatives to synthetic compounds [6,7]. This increased attention has resulted in the identification of numerous plant sources rich in polyphenols, including grapes [8], cranberries [9,10], black currants [11,12], chokeberries [10,13], and olives [14], among others.
Nevertheless, despite all its benefits and functional activities, the industrial production and commercialization of polyphenol-based products face numerous challenges. Due to the rapid degradation of polyphenols, advanced techniques such as nano- and microencapsulation are required to preserve their health benefits. These challenges are compounded by the high costs of extraction and purification, as well as the limited amount of research on their long-term stability. Additionally, regulatory hurdles stemming from their natural origins further impede market advancement. These factors complicate the commercial development of polyphenol-containing products, despite their recognized health value. However, future advancements in encapsulation technologies and a better understanding of polyphenol bioavailability may offer solutions to these issues.
In this review, the authors will provide an overview of what is currently known regarding the vaginal microbiome and the application of polyphenols in the treatment of vaginal-associated infections, making use of advanced delivery systems.
A PubMed search was conducted to determine the number of articles published under the following entry words: “(vaginal infections) AND (polyphenols)”. The search results are presented in Figure 1. According to the data collected, there has been an increase in research involving polyphenols and their applications in vaginal-related infections. Nevertheless, if all papers on this subject are considered, the number is still low, with 19 publications since 2011. Another search was carried out regarding the number of publications that included the words “(vaginal microbiome) AND (polyphenols) AND (infections)”, with a total of zero entries, which provides a good indication that this subject is still quite unexplored. Therefore, this review provides background insight into a subject that can soon be widely studied.
Integrating polyphenols into delivery systems aligns with the growing demand for sustainable healthcare solutions. This review emphasizes the potential of polyphenols, not just for their direct therapeutic benefits, but also for their role in pioneering environmentally friendly and patient-centered approaches. By exploring controlled and innovative delivery mechanisms, such as nanoparticles, liposomes, and hydrogels, the review aims to highlight the importance of continued research in developing next-generation formulations that are both natural and effective for managing VIs.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Design

This review offers a comprehensive examination of the different types of VIs and their most used treatments. The primary aim of the review is to highlight the known potential of polyphenols and suggest their use, particularly when encapsulated, as a novel treatment option for these infections.

2.2. Data Collection

Data were gathered through an organized exploration of English-language publications in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The following keywords were employed during the search: “Phenolic compounds”, “Circular economy”, “Sustainability”, “Vaginal infections”, “Encapsulation”, “Vaginal microbiome”, “Antimicrobial activity”, and “Advanced systems”. All relevant articles and abstracts published within the last five years were included in this review. The selection was based on their alignment with the review’s scope and objectives, with an emphasis on studies offering detailed insights into polyphenols, their pharmacological effects, and mechanisms of action. In total, about 100 articles were incorporated into the analysis.
Furthermore, the key polyphenols discussed in this review are listed below in Figure 2. This figure provides a visual representation of the primary polyphenols analyzed, tannic acid (C76H52O46), quercetin (C15H10O7), gallic acid (C7H6O5), (-)-epicatechin (C15H14O6) and trans-resveratrol (C14H12O3).

3. Vaginal Microbiome

The vaginal microbiome is a crucial component of the female body’s microbiome and plays a significant role in maintaining vaginal and reproductive health [15]. It is involved in maintaining its homeostasis and equilibrium. The species within the vaginal microbiome are mutually interdependent and controlled by various factors, such as local immunity, the endocrine system, and the internal environment [16]. Disruption in this balance can lead to dysbiosis, which is associated with various adverse health outcomes, including bacterial vaginosis (BV), preterm birth (PTB), and increased risk of STIs [17,18]. The vaginal microbiome consists of a diverse array of microorganisms, where the host provides the bacteria with nutrients needed to support their growth, and, in exchange, they play a protective role in preventing colonization of the host by potentially pathogenic organisms [19].
Culture-independent methods primarily relying on the examination of 16S rRNA gene sequences are employed to identify microbial diversity [20]. By utilizing this approach, researchers have been able to determine that vaginal communities are primarily governed by Lactobacillus spp., responsible for around 73% of its microbiota, and the more prevalent species were L. crispatus, L. iners, L. gasseri, and L. jensii [19].
Lactobacilli convert glycogen from exfoliated epithelial cells into lactic acid, keeping the vaginal pH of healthy women of reproductive age acidic (pH between 4 and 5), which inhibits the growth of pathogenic microorganisms [19,20]. They also exhibit antimicrobial properties beyond the effect of lactic acid production, such as producing target-specific bacteriocins. The vaginal microbiome, and consequently the pH, varies by age, menstrual cycle stage, the occurrence of infection, and sexual arousal. Menstrual, cervical, and uterine secretions, and sperm act as alkalizing agents and raise the pH. Changes in hormone levels (particularly estrogenic) during the menstrual cycle cause changes in epithelial cell layer thickness, intercellular channel width, pH, and secretions [21].
Contrary to previous beliefs associating a “healthy” and “normal” vaginal microbiome with the predominance of Lactobacillus spp. [22], recent studies have revealed that 20% to 30% of healthy women carry vaginal communities where lactobacilli are not significantly present. Instead, these communities consist of a diverse range of facultative or strictly anaerobic bacteria, such as Atopobium, Corynebacterium, Anaerococcus, Peptoniphilus, Prevotella, Gardnerella, Sneathia, Eggerthella, Mobiluncus, and Finegoldia, among others [19,23]. These microorganisms possess the ability to sustain functional vaginal ecosystems by preserving lactic acid production, and some of them can engage in either homolactic or heterolactic acid fermentation [24].
Understanding the vaginal microbiome and its role in maintaining vaginal equilibrium is crucial for promoting women’s health and reproductive well-being.

4. Vaginal Infections

VIs are highly prevalent among adult women, specifically of reproductive age, ages varying between 15 and 49 years old [25,26], and are frequently encountered in clinical practice. Most women experience symptoms associated with vaginal problems, including discharge, itching, and odor. These symptoms can be distressing and embarrassing, often prompting women to seek healthcare assistance. Worldwide, it is estimated that approximately 5-10 million medical appointments per year are specifically attributed to vaginal symptoms. The primary culprits behind these symptoms are typically three types of infections: BV, trichomoniasis, or vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). These account for over 90% of vaginitis cases and the remaining cases are due to other poorly defined entities [26].

4.1. Bacterial Vaginosis

BV is the most common VI among women of childbearing age and the prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic BV varies depending on the population studied. It is commonly diagnosed in women seeking gynecologic care, especially in STIs. Pregnant and sexually active women also have a higher risk [26].
The exact cause of BV remains uncertain, but it is widely recognized that the primary factor is an excessive proliferation of anaerobic bacteria such as Gardnerella, Mycoplasma, and Mobiluncus species [26]. This overgrowth occurs due to factors like increased substrate availability, elevated pH, and, most importantly, the absence of the normal Lactobacillus bacteria that typically inhabit the vagina. The absence of Lactobacillus leads to reduced hydrogen peroxide production, which normally helps inhibit the growth of harmful pathogens [27]. There is a correlation between the excessive proliferation of anaerobic bacteria and elevated production of trimethylamine, the specific compound responsible for the unpleasant fishy odor commonly associated with BV [28].
Clinical features of BV include vaginal malodor and an abnormal discharge, especially noticeable after intercourse [29]. Nonetheless, up to 50% of women with BV may be asymptomatic [30]. Diagnosis is based on objective criteria, including the presence of clue cells on microscopy (exfoliated epithelial cells covered with G. vaginalis), a positive sniff/whiff test on the addition of 10% KOH, vaginal pH above 4.5, and an adherent greyish-white discharge [29]. Wet-mount examination and Gram staining are also useful in confirming the diagnosis [30].

4.2. Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

VVC is the most common clinical disease caused by Candida spp. and the second most common VI after BV [31]. VVC is thought to affect around 75% women of childbearing age [32], and around half of all college women by age 25, with 50% having a second reoccurrence [31,32]. Also, it has been reported that around 7% of women will develop recurrent VVC [33], defined as three or more symptomatic episodes within 1 year [34]. VVC includes the spectrum of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, both fostering the development of positive cultures. The symptoms vary with the host’s response and the infectious organism [31].
Between 85 and 90% of yeasts isolated from women with VCC are Candida albicans strains [35]. This highly versatile pathogen can adapt its growth to several physiological extremes, and it also possesses several genes that encode proteins that increase its virulence through host recognition and binding to the host cells, such as ALS1, HWP1, and INT1, whose proteins provide adherence, and MTN1; strains without this gene in vivo were avirulent [36]. Another protein with significant virulence is candidalysin toxin, which is encoded by the ECE1 gene. Previous research has shown that this gene is regulated in a highly complex way by multiple transcription factors. However, intraspecies heterogeneity is extremely significant to strain-dependent pathogenicity and the virulence mechanisms employed by natural isolates are neglected. Data from previous reports underlined that the capacity to induce damage is linked to neutrophil migration. The ECE1 expression alone does not serve as a substitute of a pathogenicity indicator, as ineffective candidalysin secretion would likely impact pathogenicity. Therefore, the variant of ECE1 may also contribute to the reduced pathogenicity associated with C. albicans [37]. The remainder is other species, the most common of which are C. glabrata (formerly known as Torulopsis glabrata) and C. tropicalis [38]. Some of these species possess the ability to cause vaginitis, often more resistant to conventional therapy than C. albicans [30].
VVC is more common and harder to eradicate during pregnancy [31], due to the higher incidence of vaginal colonization, increasing from 9% in the first trimester to 54% in the third trimester [39]. This is most likely due to the higher contents of glycogen and carbon derived from higher levels of reproductive hormones, which are valuable resources for Candida growth and germination [30]. Other factors that increase the prevalence of VCC are high-estrogenic-containing oral contraceptives [31], the use of tight, poorly ventilated clothing, which increases perineal moisture and temperature [30], and the systemic use of antibiotics, mainly tetracycline, ampicillin, and cephalosporin, which end up eliminating the protective vaginal microbiota [30].
As stated before, the symptoms of VCC vary, but some clinical signs and symptoms include vulvovaginal pruritus, irritation, soreness, burning or micturition, and whitish, cheesy discharge. Most cases of VCC are detected by self-diagnosis, which is the basis for purchasing over-the-counter antimycotics [31]. Laboratory diagnosis methods include a latex agglutination slide technique, microscopic examination of vaginal secretions, or a 10% KOH preparation (whiff test) [30].

4.3. Trichomonal Vaginitis

Trichomoniasis is a common global infection, with an estimated annual distribution of approximately 170 million cases of trichomonal vaginitis. In the United States, it is estimated that 2 to 3 million women contract symptomatic trichomoniasis each year [40].
The disease is caused by the pathogenic parasite Trichomonas vaginalis, an anaerobic protozoa, which can cause cervicitis and urethritis [40]. The parasite is primarily transmitted through sexual activity, causing around 70% of male sexual partners of infected women to show its presence [41]. Thus, the use of non-barrier methods of contraception is significantly associated with trichomoniasis [42]. This parasite requires many essential nutrients for growth, and these are found in the vagina and vaginal secretions [43], e.g., an increase in iron salts (largely present in menstrual blood) facilitates overgrowth and clinical worsening of trichomoniasis symptoms [44]. The parasite can also obtain nutrients by digesting bacteria, such as through phagocytosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae [45].
Due to the vague character of the clinical presentation and its overlap with the clinical signs of other STIs, the diagnosis of trichomoniasis based solely on clinical features is insufficient. It ranges from asymptomatic, up to 50%, to severe acute inflammatory disease. Most common symptoms that affect up to half, and sometimes more, women that report having trichomoniasis include vaginal discharge, malodorous or not, pruritus, dyspareunia, and dysuria. Less common symptoms are lower abdominal discomfort, vulvar erythema, and “strawberry cervix” (punctate hemorrhages visible to the naked eye) [30].
As previously mentioned, trichomoniasis is difficult to diagnose through clinical features, as they are not specific only to this infection. pH values greater than 4.5 are present in 90% of cases, and a fishy odor after the smell test is present in 50% of cases, but these are not specific symptoms of trichomoniasis. A better solution to differentiate this pathology from BV is through polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs). The ratio of PMNs to vaginal epithelial cells in BV is less than 1 in over 90% of cases, while for trichomoniasis, this ratio is greater than 1 in 75% of infections. Additionally, a microscopic evaluation is another valuable approach, as the direct observation of Trichomonas can detect 60–80% of cases. However, the standard method for diagnosis is Diamond’s media culture, which can detect 95% of cases [46,47].

4.4. Aerobic Vaginitis

Aerobic vaginitis (AV) is a more recently discovered non-classifiable pathology that differs from BV [48]. Similar to other VIs, AV is characterized by an imbalance in the vaginal microbiota, leading to a change in the environment pH. However, it is unclear if this is the cause or a derivation of AV. Some studies propose that the disease is an immunological disorder due to the existence of inflammation and the presence of immature epithelial cells. Overall, the microbiota present in AV consists of commensal aerobic microorganisms originating from the intestines, which include Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Enterococcus faecalis. The prevalence of AV ranges between 7 and 12% [49].
Despite being comparable to BV, these two should not be confused. AV is characterized by an objective abnormal yellow vaginal discharge, foul smell, elevated pH (>5), vaginal dyspareunia, vulvovaginal itching, and cervical erosion [48].
Diagnosis is made through microscopic examinations with fresh wet mounts and the severity of AV is defined using five different criteria, each rated as absent (0 points), moderate (1 point), or severe (2 points), and the sum of the points determines the diagnosis of AV. These criteria are lactobacillary grades (LBG), number of leukocytes, proportion of toxic leukocytes, background microbiota, and proportion of parabasal epitheliocytes [50].

4.5. Microbial Biofilm

The relapse of these conditions in an individual is a common occurrence, where even after multiple cycles of antibiotic therapy, the infections are not completely irradicated. This is primarily caused by the main pathogens in the diseases, such as C. albicans in VCC and G. vaginalis in BV, which use biofilm formation as a major strategy in initiating and maintaining infections [51,52].
A microbial biofilm is formed when a surface is colonized by microorganisms which then produce an extracellular matrix that provides resistance, faster signalling among cells, and better nutrient circulation [53]. This makes it much harder for the antimicrobials to kill the biofilm [54]. After increasing in size, the biofilm’s inner cells disperse and establish themselves in other locations, beginning new infections.
There have been many studies performed on novel treatments for these biofilms due to the low efficacy of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies [53]; however, more research is needed to expand these treatment options.

5. Oral Medication Versus Topical Application

Contrary to urinary infections, in which the first line of medication is oral antibiotics (i.e., nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) [55], topical treatments of VI have shown to be at least as effective as an oral treatment in most cases, thus resulting in higher local drug concentrations and fewer drug interactions and adverse effects (Table 1) [56]. However, for recurrent symptoms, oral antibiotics, and maybe simultaneously medication, are inevitable.
Each of the most common VIs has different clinical and pathological characteristics that have a significant impact on the efficacy of topical treatments and the development of effective topical approaches. A common occurrence is infection with several pathogenic microorganisms. This not only causes diagnostic difficulties, but also increases the risk of failure to treat a hidden overlapping problem, explaining the persistence of symptoms after a supposedly adequate treatment regimen for the identified clinical entity. Furthermore, the emergence of chemotherapeutic-resistant bacteria and the difficulties in managing infection recurrence underscore the need for more effective local treatments [56].
The therapeutic efficacy of conventional drugs can be improved by using formulation strategies that improve drug retention, solubility, and distribution in the vaginal tract, while also promoting drug interaction with pathogens and aiding in the recovery of the regular vaginal environment. To achieve these objectives, researchers must consider not only the physical and chemical properties of the drug and the overall formulation but also the specific features of the physiological environment that will be met after administration [56]. The amount, composition, microbiome, and pH of vaginal fluid are expected to influence the performance of vaginal drug delivery systems, as demonstrated in formulations subjected to physiologically simulated conditions [57,58,59].
There are several types of treatments for VIs (Table 1), including short-duration therapies. Yeast infections are often treated effectively with antifungal agents over a period of three to seven days. Common antifungal treatments include miconazole and clotrimazole, which are available in various forms such as creams, suppositories, and tablets. Some of these medications, like miconazole creams and clotrimazole pessaries, are available over the counter, while others, like fluconazole or butoconazole, may require a prescription. Brands like Vagisil® and Gino-canesten® also offer widely used products containing these active ingredients. The rise of resistance to existing antifungal and antibacterial treatments underscores the growing need for new therapeutic approaches in managing VIs.
Table 1. Active ingredients for VI treatment.
Table 1. Active ingredients for VI treatment.
Active IngredientIndicationsDosage FormMechanism of ActionReference
ClotrimazoleVVCCream, Tablet, PessaryInhibits ergosterol synthesis in fungal cell membranes, disrupting cell integrity.[60,61]
MiconazoleVVCCream, SuppositoryInhibits fungal cell membrane synthesis by blocking ergosterol production.[62,63]
MetronidazoleBV, Trichomonal vaginitisGel, Oral, TabletDisrupts DNA synthesis in anaerobic bacteria and protozoa.[64,65]
TinidazoleBV, Trichomonal vaginitisOral TabletDNA synthesis inhibition in anaerobic organisms.[66,67]
FluconazoleRecurrent VVCOral TabletInhibits ergosterol synthesis, leading to fungal cell death.[68,69]
ButoconazoleVVCCreamInhibits fungal cell membrane ergosterol production, disrupting fungal growth.[70,71]
NystatinVVCVaginal Tablet, CreamBinds to sterols in the fungal cell membrane, causing leakage of cell contents.[72,73]
ClindamycinBVCream, Gel, Oral TabletInhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit.[74,75]
Boric AcidRecurrent VVCVaginal SuppositoryAcidifies the vaginal environment, making it hostile to fungal growth.[76,77]
Estradiol/Conjugated EstrogensAVCream, Tablet, RingRestores vaginal tissue by increasing epithelial cell growth and pH balance.[78,79]
Recent research on VI treatment strategies includes the development of more appropriate drug delivery systems for well-established drugs, with a special focus on improving the distribution, retention, and acceptability of formulations [80,81], some of which allow modulation of drug release, prolonged activity and reduced toxicity [56].
Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria are of high concern and earmarked for surveillance, according to the Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC). Those include extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant bacteria, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B-resistant, vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA). Suppose these bacteria are present in the female vaginal tract; in that case, they can be passed to newborns, resulting in local or systemic infections that are difficult to treat with currently available antimicrobials. Up-to-date information on the prevalence of colonization with major antimicrobial-resistant organisms is required to design successful treatment options [82].

6. Polyphenols as Antimicrobial Agents

Over the last 70 years, antibiotics have proven to be valuable drugs in treating bacterial infections [83]. However, their great availability has caused a general misuse, most commonly, extensive and unregulated use. This behavior, in turn, has given rise to new strains of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDR), more problematic than the original ones [84]. These include methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), whose incidence in US intensive care units rose from 2% in 1974 to 64% in 2008 [85]. Regarding multi-drug-resistant E. coli, in a 2012 study, MDR was present in 92.2% of E. coli (n = 232) isolates from Khartoum state, Sudan [86]; in a previous study in 2000, it was 58% [87]. This bacterial resistance normally occurs by genomic mutation or through the acquisition of new genetic information that encodes resistance elements [84]. Almost 20 years after the discovery of penicillin, 50% of all S. aureus were penicillin-resistant, and around 10 years later, that number rose to almost 80%. Methicillin was released in 1960, and only one year later, the first strains of MRSA were discovered [88,89]. Clindamycin, an antibiotic used to treat BV, has been shown to create a path for clindamycin-resistant anaerobic bacteria; in a study performed on 48 women, from whom 1059 anaerobic bacteria isolates were obtained, 53% of these demonstrated resistance after therapy [90].
Thus, with an ever-growing concern over antibiotic-resistant microorganisms, the scientific community started researching new compounds with antimicrobial activity. Plant extracts have been part of human health for centuries, with the earliest findings of the use of medical plants dating up to 4000 B.C. Although these medicines may be efficient for the treatment of diseases such as urinary tract infections (e.g., Arctostaphylos uvaursi) and tuberculosis infections (e.g., oils of Hydrastis canadensis), very few are regulated as antimicrobials [84].
Plants, when under stress, on tissue disruption or pathogen attack, produce various phytochemical compounds as a defense mechanism. These secondary metabolites include phytoalexins, polyphenols such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and other products [84]. Polyphenols, or “plant phenols”, are divided into many classes, with the main ones being phenolic acids, flavonoids, stilbenes, phenolic alcohols, and lignans [91]. Each of these classes has its base molecular structure and therefore its mechanism of action against microorganisms. These include binding to cell wall proteins, leading to loss of functions, enzyme inhibition, and interaction with substrates, leaving them unavailable to the microorganism, among other effects [92].
The number of plant species that exist and the number of plants to be described is not agreed upon, but speculations lie around 250,000–280,000 of the former and 50,000–70,000 of the latter [93]. Additionally, with different secondary metabolites produced by each plant species ranging from 500 to 800, the world of potential therapeutic products derived from these compounds is very large [84]. Several studies are being conducted on polyphenols and their correlation with antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [94,95,96]; however, more discoveries must be made.

6.1. Quercetin

Quercetin (3,3,4,5,7-pentahydroxyflavone), first isolated in 1936 by Szent-Gyorgyi, belongs to the flavonoid subclass of flavonols, and it is found in several fruits and vegetables. The highest quantities of quercetin can be found in onions, asparagus, and red-leaf lettuce, while the lower ones are found in broccoli, green peppers, peas, and tomatoes [97,98]. Various medicinal plants, like Hypericum perforatum and Ginkgo biloba, also contain quercetin [99]. This polyphenol is one of the most studied [97], mainly due to its identified biological properties, such as antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial (antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal), and anti-inflammatory activities [97,98,99,100]. Furthermore, and highly relevant, the United States FDA has granted quercetin GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) status [99].
Particularly, regarding antimicrobial activity, a large variety of bacterial strains are susceptible to quercetin. Its solubility and interaction with the bacterial cell membrane have both been connected to this biological property [99]. The bactericidal action of quercetin is generally less effective against Gram-negative bacteria than against Gram-positive [101]. Similar results have been observed for some quercetin derivates [102]. A study by Shu et al. (2011) showed that Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus sanguis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemocomitans, and Prevotella intermedia were inhibited by quercetin, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 1 to 8 mg/mL [103]. S. aureus (including MRSA and MSSA (methicillin-sensitive S. aureus) [104]) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were likewise susceptible to the inhibitory effects of quercetin at MIC levels of 20 µg/mL [105]. Moreover, Candida spp. [106], C. albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [104] have all been shown to be susceptible to quercetin antifungal effects.

6.2. Resveratrol

Resveratrol (3,4′,5-trihydroxystilbene), first isolated in 1939 by Takaoka from Veratrum grandiflorum O. Loes (root of the white hellebore) [107], is a member of the stilbene family [4], and it is commonly found in red fruits and berries, specifically in grape pulp, skin, seeds, and stems [108], being produced in response to environmental stress [109]. Its basic structure is composed of two phenolic rings linked together by a double styrene bond, with the molecular formula C14H12O3, which results in 3,5,4′-trihydroxystilbene. This double bond is responsible for resveratrol isomeric cis- and trans-forms. It is worth noting that the trans-isomer is the more stable form from a steric point of view [110]. This polyphenol is widely explored due to its biological properties, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial (antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal), anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antidiabetic, wound healing, and neuroprotective activities [4,108,109,111,112]. Furthermore, resveratrol’s anticancer effects have been extensively explored since the initial report in the prestigious journal ‘Science’ in 1997 [113]. The accumulated results indicate that it might be a potential agent for the prevention and treatment of numerous cancers, including breast, cervical, uterus, skin, stomach, kidney, and liver cancers [112,114,115,116]. Moreover, this polyphenol is considered safe and well-tolerated [111,117].
Regarding resveratrol’s antimicrobial activity, its antifungal effect is generally stronger than its antibacterial action [117]. For example, it inhibited the fungal species C. albicans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Trichosporon beigelii, with MICs ranging from 10 to 20 µg/mL [118]. For some bacteria species, resveratrol only has a growth inhibitory effect at doses > 100 µg/mL. For instance, Gram-positive pathogens such as S. aureus [119,120,121,122] and Enterococcus faecalis [119,121] present MICs around 100–200 µg/mL, while Gram-negative ones, such as E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa [119,121,122], being less susceptible, present MICs superior to 200 µg/mL.

6.3. Gallic Acid

Gallic acid (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid), first discovered in 1786 by Carl Wilhelm [123], is a secondary metabolite that occurs in several plants, vegetables, nuts, and fruits. It has the chemical formula C7H6O5, and it is composed of one benzene ring with three contiguous OH groups at the 3, 4, and 5 positions, as well as one carboxyl group at position 1. This polyphenol is nowadays considered of great importance due to its vast range of biological properties [123], mostly imparted by the hydroxyl groups [100], comprising antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-dengue, anti-platelet, anti-apoptotic, antimicrobial, anti-arteriosclerosis, anti-tumor and anti-cancer activities [100,123,124,125]. Gallic acid was also found to decrease melanogenesis to overcome pigmentation and protect cells from UV-B or ionizing irradiation, which is why it is employed as an essential ingredient in many cosmetic formulations [126]. Furthermore, this compound also holds GRAS status, granted by the FDA [127].
Concerning the antimicrobial properties of gallic acid, it is thought to be active against microorganisms due to the three hydroxyl groups in its molecule, as mentioned before. It was demonstrated [128,129] that this polyphenol has antimicrobial action against the following bacteria: Salmonella typhimurium, E. coli, S. aureus, Listeria innocua, Helicobacter pylori, Campylobacter spp., and Pseudomonas. According to these studies, gallic acid has the capacity to degrade bacterial cell membranes, which leads to irreversible permeability alterations, rupture, hole formation, and a decrease in negative surface charge. The leakage of vital intracellular components is a result of this activity. Moreover, some reported MICs range from 0.5 to 8 mg/mL for E. coli, Streptococcus mutans, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes [130,131,132].

6.4. Tannic Acid

Tannic acid, first identified in 1795, is a hydrolyzable polyphenolic molecule found in almost every aerial plant tissue, both herbaceous and wood types [133]. The molecular structure is not yet fully clarified; it is described as consisting of a central glucose molecule with ten gallic acid molecules attached to it [134]. It is worth noting that the natural source of the compound has a big impact on its phenolic composition, i.e., tannic acid from oriental nutgalls has less penta- and hexagalloyl esters, leading to higher molecular weight, while tannic acid from Turkish nutgall has a predominance of penta- and hexa-esters, and thus a lower molecular weight [135].
For the last century, this phenolic acid has been used for a variety of applications, such as the manufacture of ink, printing fabrics, photography, or as a coagulant in rubber production [135]. Due to its various unique properties, this compound has been subjected to extensive research, including its antiviral and antimicrobial activities. It can inhibit the adhesion of viruses and bacteria to surfaces, as well as interfere with the metabolism of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and viruses [136]. Some of the microorganisms for which tannic acid has antimicrobial activity include E. coli [95,137], S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA) [138,139], and C. albicans [140]. Furthermore, it also possesses antioxidant properties, as demonstrated by the formation of complexes with Fe(II), inhibiting the participation in Fenton reactions [141].

6.5. Epicatechin

(-)-Epicatechin ((2R,3R)-2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-chromene-3,5,7-triol) is part of the flavonoid subclass of flavon-3-ols [142,143]; it was discovered in 1948 and it is primarily found in both green and black tea. It is present in lower amounts in berries, common fruits, cocoa, and many non-alcoholic drinks [144]. Its molecule is composed of two benzene rings, with two hydroxyl groups each, and a dihydropyran heterocyclic ring with a hydroxyl group in carbon 3 [144,145]. The presence of a chiral center in positions two and three of the plant-derived flavon-3-ol led to four diastereoisomers: (+)-epicatechin, (-)-epicatechin, (+)-catechin, and (-)-catechin [142,146]. The compound has drawn considerable attention, and it has been explored for its biological properties, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, anti-diabetic, and cardioprotective activities [4,142,144].
Regarding antimicrobial activity, epicatechins originating in the plant Saraca indica have shown antibacterial activity against a variety of multidrug-resistant pathogens, including S. aureus [147]. This polyphenol and its derivates inhibit antibiotic efflux pumps in S. aureus, which is resistant to penicillin, erythromycin, methicillin, and clindamycin, with MIC values between 32 and 512 µg/mL, according to different publications [147,148,149]. Another study by Li et al. (2022) [150] reported the antimicrobial activity of (-)-Epicatechin-3-gallate (a derivate) against L. monocytogenes, P. aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, and S. aureus, with MICs ranging from 375 to 500 µg/mL.

7. Polyphenols in Advanced Systems

As mentioned previously, pathogens such as bacteria, fungi, parasites, and viruses cause infectious diseases, and the number of patients identified with resistant microbial infections is increasing [151]. Unfortunately, bacteria that are resistant to standard antibiotics have emerged rapidly over the past few decades, resulting in 700,000 global annual deaths, of which over 200,000 are infants [152]. In this regard, alternative bio-derived products have been employed as a potential strategy to fight infectious diseases. Specifically, polyphenolic compounds have been explored as antibacterial agents, and previous reports indicate efficacy for treating several of these microbial infections (reviewed in [153]). However, due to their physicochemical features and typically limited water solubility, polyphenolic delivery has been challenging. In this context, several innovative drug delivery methods can provide some advantages, such as improved bioavailability and controlled release of polyphenolic compounds [154]. Drug delivery systems can be defined as techniques where materials are employed to deliver therapeutic agents to specified targets in a regulated or controlled manner [155].
Joraholmen et al. (2020) [111] developed an advanced delivery system consisting of resveratrol-loaded liposomes incorporated in a chitosan hydrogel, for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. In this study, both free resveratrol and resveratrol liposomes inhibited C. trachomatis proliferation. Nonetheless, the effect was higher when incorporated into the mentioned delivery system, with inhibition of 78% and 94% for 1.5 and 3 g/mL resveratrol, respectively, compared to 43% and 72%, for free resveratrol at the same concentrations. Furthermore, resveratrol liposomes in hydrogel demonstrated a potent anti-inflammatory effect in vitro, inhibiting nitric oxide (NO) generation in LPS-treated macrophages (RAW 264.7 cells), in a concentration-dependent manner.
In 2019, Joraholmen and colleagues [4] performed similar work, developing a delivery system comprising resveratrol- or epicatechin-loaded liposomes formulated in a chitosan-based hydrogel for vaginal application. In this work, liposomes presented an approximate size of 200 nm and entrapment efficiencies of 81 and 77% for resveratrol and epicatechin, respectively, and medium molecular weight chitosan at 2.5% w/w concentration has been shown to exhibit optimum textural features and mucoadhesiveness in ex vivo conditions. This system was non-toxic, and epicatechin-loaded liposomes exhibited superior radical scavenging activity at lower concentrations than vitamins C and E. This epicatechin superiority was also demonstrated with the higher inhibitory effect on the NO production by RAW 264.7 cells (higher anti-inflammatory activity), compared to the resveratrol-loaded formulation.
Giordani et al. (2020) [100] produced novel liposomes for the simultaneous administration of two polyphenols, quercetin and gallic acid, that, when released into the vaginal cavity, functioned to eliminate infection, while reducing VVC symptoms. Quercetin was chosen for its anti-itching and anti-inflammatory effects, whereas gallic acid was chosen for its anti-Candida activity. Quercetin-, gallic acid- and (quercetin + gallic acid)-loaded liposomes with a 200 nm size were developed. Quercetin entrapment efficiency was 85% in both quercetin liposomes, whereas gallic acid was less efficiently entrapped, with 30 and 25% in (quercetin + gallic acid) and gallic acid liposomes, respectively. Liposomes, particularly (quercetin + gallic acid) ones, promoted the prolonged release of both polyphenols, and their joint administration improved the antioxidant activity. Also, liposomes were non-cytotoxic and had greater anti-inflammatory effects than free polyphenols. Finally, gallic acid and (quercetin + gallic acid) liposomes significantly inhibited C. albicans growth. In another study, Ci et al. (2017) [156] constructed an in situ thermosensitive hydrogel delivery system based on amino-functionalized poloxamer 407 (F127-NH2) for vaginal administration of acetate gossypol, a polyphenolic aldehyde. This hydrogel exhibited controlled release while having mucoadhesive properties, which derived from the amino (NH2) functionalization of poloxamer 407 (F127). As seen above, the research on the administration of polyphenols using advanced delivery systems for vaginal applications (Figure 3) is still limited.
In this context, an analysis of other delivery systems with polyphenols, with distinct applications, can give suggestions for the development of novel forms for vaginal administration. Most of those other systems comprise protein-, metal-, polymer-, small molecule-, and nucleic acid-polyphenol-based nano delivery systems [157,158]. These include nanoparticles (solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers), nanoemulsions, nanocapsules, liposomes, and nano hydrogels, among others [159,160,161]. Also, a recently published paper by our group [155] reported some more examples of potential nano delivery systems (e.g., dendrimers, niosomes) for polyphenols, summarizing their advantages. For example, Joraholmen et al. [162] concluded that chitosan-based liposomes successfully loaded resveratrol with an encapsulation efficiency of approx. 75% for topical treatment of vaginal inflammation and infection. Furthermore, Schlich et al. [163], for nutraceutical purposes, prepared resveratrol-loaded niosomes composed of Tween 20/Span 60 and cholesterol. These compounds showed minimal cytotoxicity for intestinal cells, displaying potential for oral intake. Imran et al. [164] developed a dual drug-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) gel, with resveratrol and quercetin for improved disposition in skin layers, obtaining a resveratrol encapsulation efficiency of almost 90%. Tsai et al. [165] created resveratrol-loaded nanoemulsions using Caproyl 90 or isopropyl myristate as the oil phase, and propylene glycol and ethanol as cosurfactants. After 24 applications, the particles increased transdermal penetration and resveratrol deposition in the skin by 896.2- and 10.2-fold, respectively, when compared to the drug solution group. An in vivo study found that resveratrol plasma concentrations remained high for a long period following topical emulsion application. Pentek et al. [166] found that using polyamidoamide dendrimers improved resveratrol solubility and stability in aqueous and semisolid dose forms. Furthermore, the dendrimer enhanced resveratrol loading and skin penetration. Minnelli et al. [167] encapsulated resveratrol in bovine serum albumin-coated layered double hydroxide (LDH–BSA), allowing a better encapsulation efficiency when compared to only LDH. Moreover, Li et al. [168] showed that resveratrol-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles functionalized with red blood cell membranes have a better half-life and mean residence time when compared to simple resveratrol-loaded PLGA nanoparticles. Table 2 summarizes the examples mentioned above. Such knowledge can be transferred towards new forms for the treatment of VI.

8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The environment of the typical vaginal microbiota is continually evolving due to a wide range of physiological and environmental variables. Vaginal dysbiosis is characterized by changes in the variety or number of microorganisms, mainly by the reduction in Lactobacillus sp. and increases in certain pathogenic anaerobic bacteria, which promote inflammation. Vaginal dysbiosis has been linked to a significant rise in the incidence of STIs, preterm delivery, and infertility.
High rates of treatment failure and recurrence are linked to VIs. These can be attributed to the inability of antibiotics to effectively treat VI, as well as to failures in the restoration of the physiologic vaginal environment following antibiotic therapy. The conception of novel diagnostic and prognostic microbiological indicators, as well as of reasonable targets for the development of novel preventative and therapeutic drugs, may be aided by a better knowledge of the microbiome roles.
The scientific literature supporting the positive effect of some polyphenols in treating VIs is still limited. To validate the effectiveness and safety of these alternative therapeutic agents, which might be used in place of or in addition to the conventional therapies, more studies, including in vivo ones, need to be carried out.
In conclusion, while polyphenols have been extensively researched, their application in encapsulation for vaginal treatments presents significant untapped potential. Looking ahead, there is a promising future for exploring advanced delivery systems to further enhance the therapeutic efficacy of polyphenols in addressing VIs. Continued innovation in this area could open new avenues for more targeted and effective treatments, expanding the scope and impact of polyphenol-based therapies in women’s health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A., M.L.C., J.P.F., S.B.-S. and S.B.; methodology, E.A., M.L.C., J.P.F., S.B.-S. and S.B.; software, not applied; validation, J.P.F., M.P., S.B.-S. and S.B.; formal analysis, E.A., M.L.C., J.P.F., M.P., S.B.-S. and S.B.; investigation, E.A., M.L.C., J.P.F., S.B.-S. and S.B.; resources, not applied; data curation, not applied; writing—original draft preparation, E.A. and M.L.C.; writing—review and editing, J.P.F., M.P., S.B.-S. and S.B.; visualization, J.P.F., M.P., S.B.-S. and S.B.; supervision, S.B.-S. and S.B.; project administration, not applied; funding acquisition, not applied. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through project UID/Multi/50016/2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AV, aerobic vaginitis; BV, bacterial vaginosis; CC, cervical cancer; CISMAC, Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health; ESBL, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; GA, GRAS, Generally Recognized As Safe; HIV, Human immunodeficiency virus; HPV, Human Papillomavirus; LDH-BSA, bovine serum albumin-coated layered double hydroxide; LGB, lactobacillary grades; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MDR, multi-drug-resistant organisms; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; NLC, nanostructured lipid carrier; NO, nitric oxide; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); PMNs, polymorphonuclear cells; PTB, preterm birth; STI, sexually transmitted infections; VI, vaginal infections; VRSA, vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VVC, vulvovaginal candidiasis.

References

  1. Di Paola, M.; Sani, C.; Clemente, A.M.; Iossa, A.; Perissi, E.; Castronovo, G.; Tanturli, M.; Rivero, D.; Cozzolino, F.; Cavalieri, D.; et al. Characterization of cervico-vaginal microbiota in women developing persistent high-risk Human Papillomavirus infection. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Łaniewski, P.; Ilhan, Z.E.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2020, 17, 232–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jovanovic, A.; Petrovic, P.; Ðordjevic, V.; Zdunic, G.; Savikin, K.; Bugarski, B. Polyphenols extraction from plant sources. Lek. Sirovine 2017, 37, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jøraholmen, M.W.; Basnet, P.; Tostrup, M.J.; Moueffaq, S.; Škalko-Basnet, N. Localized Therapy of Vaginal Infections and Inflammation: Liposomes-In-Hydrogel Delivery System for Polyphenols. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Roy, R.; Tiwari, M.; Donelli, G.; Tiwari, V. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action. Virulence 2018, 9, 522–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ben El Hadj Ali, I.; Bahri, R.; Chaouachi, M.; Boussaïd, M.; Harzallah-Skhiri, F. Phenolic content, antioxidant and allelopathic activities of various extracts of Thymus numidicus Poir. organs. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 62, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Canadanovic-Brunet, J.M.; Djilas, S.M.; Cetkovic, G.S.; Tumbas, V.T.; Mandic, A.I.; Canadanovic, V.M. Antioxidant activities of different Teucrium montanum L. Extracts. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 41, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cavaliere, C.; Foglia, P.; Gubbiotti, R.; Sacchetti, P.; Samperi, R.; Laganà, A. Rapid-resolution liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry for determination and quantitation of polyphenols in grape berries. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 22, 3089–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Borges, G.; Degeneve, A.; Mullen, W.; Crozier, A. Identification of Flavonoid and Phenolic Antioxidants in Black Currants, Blueberries, Raspberries, Red Currants, and Cranberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 3901–3909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Teleszko, M.; Wojdyło, A. Comparison of phenolic compounds and antioxidant potential between selected edible fruits and their leaves. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 14, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chrzanowski, G.; Leszczyński, B.; Czerniewicz, P.; Sytykiewicz, H.; Matok, H.; Krzyżanowski, R.; Sempruch, C. Effect of phenolic acids from black currant, sour cherry and walnut on grain aphid (Sitobion avenae F.) development. Crop. Prot. 2012, 35, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nowak, A.; Czyzowska, A.; Efenberger, M.; Krala, L. Polyphenolic extracts of cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) and blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) leaves as natural preservatives in meat products. Food Microbiol. 2016, 59, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, J.E.; Kim, G.-S.; Park, S.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, M.-B.; Lee, W.S.; Jeong, S.W.; Lee, S.J.; Jin, J.S.; Shin, S.C. Determination of chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) polyphenol components using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: Overall contribution to antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2014, 146, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pereira, A.P.; Ferreira, I.C.; Marcelino, F.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B.; Seabra, R.; Estevinho, L.; Bento, A.; Pereira, J.A. Phenolic Compounds and Antimicrobial Activity of Olive (Olea europaea L. Cv. Cobrançosa) Leaves. Molecules 2007, 12, 1153–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Don, K.R.; Padma, K.R.; Chandana, B.V.S.; Anjum, M.R.; Mohan, S. Influence of Vaginal Microbiota on Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Mini Review. Èntomol. Appl. Sci. Lett. 2023, 10, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liao, Q.; Zhang, X.-F.; Mi, X.; Jin, F.; Sun, H.-M.; Wang, Q.-X. Influence of group B streptococcus and vaginal cleanliness on the vaginal microbiome of pregnant women. World J. Clin. Cases 2022, 10, 12578–12586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Holdcroft, A.M.; Ireland, D.J.; Payne, M.S. The Vaginal Microbiome in Health and Disease—What Role Do Common Intimate Hygiene Practices Play? Microorganisms 2023, 11, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, S.; Serrano, M.G.; Fettweis, J.M.; Basta, P.; Rosen, E.; Ludwig, K.; Sorgen, A.A.; Blakley, I.C.; Wu, M.C.; Dole, N.; et al. Race, the Vaginal Microbiome, and Spontaneous Preterm Birth. mSystems 2022, 7, e0001722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, B.; Forney, L.J.; Ravel, J. Vaginal Microbiome: Rethinking Health and Disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 66, 371–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hugenholtz, P.; Goebel, B.M.; Pace, N.R. Impact of Culture-Independent Studies on the Emerging Phylogenetic View of Bacterial Diversity. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 4765–4774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Borges, S.; Silva, J.; Teixeira, P. The role of lactobacilli and probiotics in maintaining vaginal health. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014, 289, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, P.; Lu, Y.; Li, R.; Chen, X. Use of probiotic lactobacilli in the treatment of vaginal infections: In vitro and in vivo investigations. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1153894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ravel, J.; Gajer, P.; Abdo, Z.; Schneider, G.M.; Koenig, S.S.K.; McCulle, S.L.; Karlebach, S.; Gorle, R.; Russell, J.; Tacket, C.O.; et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (Suppl. S1), 4680–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhou, X.; Bent, S.J.; Schneider, M.G.; Davis, C.C.; Islam, M.R.; Forney, L.J. Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Microbiology 2004, 150, 2565–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. WHO. Women of Reproductive Age (15–49 Years) Population (Thousands). n. d. Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/women-of-reproductive-age-(15-49-years)-population-(thousands) (accessed on 8 September 2024).
  26. Mujuzi, H.; Siya, A.; Wambi, R. Infectious vaginitis among women seeking reproductive health services at a sexual and reproductive health facility in Kampala, Uganda. BMC Women’s Health 2023, 23, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Miko, E.; Barakonyi, A. The Role of Hydrogen-Peroxide (H2O2) Produced by Vaginal Microbiota in Female Reproductive Health. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schmidt, A.C.; Leroux, J.-C. Treatments of trimethylaminuria: Where we are and where we might be heading. Drug Discov. Today 2020, 25, 1710–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sobel, J.D. Bacterial Vaginosis. Annu. Rev. Med. 2000, 51, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sobel, J. Vaginal Infections in Adult Women. Med. Clin. N. Am. 1990, 74, 1573–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sobel, J.D.; Faro, S.; Force, R.W.; Foxman, B.; Ledger, W.J.; Nyirjesy, P.R.; Reed, B.D.; Summers, P.R. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: Epidemiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic considerations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998, 178, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Disha, T.; Haque, F. Prevalence and risk factors of vulvovaginal candidosis during pregnancy: A review. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 2022, 6195712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Donders, G.; Sziller, I.O.; Paavonen, J.; Hay, P.; de Seta, F.; Bohbot, J.M.; Kotarski, J.; Vives, J.A.; Szabo, B.; Cepuliené, R.; et al. Management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis: Narrative review of the literature and European expert panel opinion. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022, 12, 934353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sobel, J.D. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. de Cássia Orlandi Sardi, J.; Silva, D.R.; Anibal, P.C.; de Campos Baldin, J.J.C.M.; Ramalho, S.R.; Rosalen, P.L.; Macedo, M.L.R.; Hofling, J.F. Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: Epidemiology and Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, Resistance, and New Therapeutic Options. Curr. Fungal Infect Rep. 2021, 15, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Calderone, R.A.; Fonzi, W.A. Virulence factors of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, J.; Willems, H.M.E.; Sansevere, E.A.; Allert, S.; Barker, K.S.; Lowes, D.J.; Dixson, A.C.; Xu, Z.; Miao, J.; DeJarnette, C.; et al. A variant ECE1 allele contributes to reduced pathogenicity of Candida albicans during vulvovaginal candidiasis. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, Z.; Jin, J.; Chen, H.; Chen, Y.; Feng, S. The bacterial communities in vagina of different Candida species-associated vulvovaginal candidiasis. Microb. Pathog. 2023, 177, 106037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morton, R.S.; Rashid, S. Candidal Vaginitis: Natural History, Predisposing Factors and Prevention. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1977, 70 (Suppl. S4), 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ryu, J.-S.; Min, D.-Y. Trichomonas vaginalis and trichomoniasis in the Republic of Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2006, 44, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sena, A.C.; Miller, W.C.; Hobbs, M.M.; Schwebke, J.R.; Leone, P.A.; Swygard, H.; Atashili, J.; Cohen, M.S. Trichomonas vaginalis infection in male sexual partners: Implications for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 44, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wølner-Hanssen, P. Clinical Manifestations of Vaginal Trichomoniasis. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1989, 261, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Petrin, D.; Delgaty, K.; Bhatt, R.; Garber, G. Clinical and microbiological aspects of Trichomonas vaginalis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 300–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lehker, M.W.; Arroyo, R.; Alderete, J.F. The regulation by iron of the synthesis of adhesins and cytoadherence levels in the protozoan Trichomonas vaginalis. J. Exp. Med. 1991, 174, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Benchimol, M.; Souza, W. Endocytosis in anaerobic parasitic protists. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2024, 119, e240058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Garber, G.E. The laboratory diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 16, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ibáñez-Escribano, A.; Nogal-Ruiz, J.J. The Past, Present, and Future in the Diagnosis of a Neglected Sexually Transmitted Infection: Trichomoniasis. Pathogens 2024, 13, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tempera, G.; Furneri, P.M. Management of Aerobic Vaginitis. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2010, 70, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Donders, G.G.; Bellen, G.; Grinceviciene, S.; Ruban, K.; Vieira-Baptista, P. Aerobic vaginitis: No longer a stranger. Res. Microbiol. 2017, 168, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Donders, G.; Bellen, G.; Rezeberga, D. Aerobic vaginitis in pregnancy. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011, 118, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, H.; Shen, L.; Dong, C.; Sun, Y.; Chen, H.; Xu, B.; Zhuang, W.; Deighton, M.; et al. Biofilm Formation of Candida albicans Facilitates Fungal Infiltration and Persister Cell Formation in Vaginal Candidiasis. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Machado, A.; Cerca, N. Influence of biofilm formation by Gardnerella vaginalis and other anaerobes on bacterial vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 212, 1856–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Muzny, C.A.; Schwebke, J.R. Biofilms: An Underappreciated Mechanism of Treatment Failure and Recurrence in Vaginal Infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mishra, S.; Gupta, A.; Upadhye, V.; Singh, S.C.; Sinha, R.P.; Häder, D.-P. Therapeutic Strategies against Biofilm Infections. Life 2023, 13, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chu, C.M.; Lowder, J.L. Diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections across age groups. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 219, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Palmeira-De-Oliveira, R.; Palmeira-De-Oliveira, A.; Martinez-De-Oliveira, J. New strategies for local treatment of vaginal infections. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 92, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Owen, D.H.; Peters, J.J.; Lavine, M.L.; Katz, D.F. Effect of temperature and pH on contraceptive gel viscosity. Contraception 2003, 67, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Aka-Any-Grah, A.; Bouchemal, K.; Koffi, A.; Agnely, F.; Zhang, M.; Djabourov, M.; Ponchel, G. Formulation of mucoadhesive vaginal hydrogels insensitive to dilution with vaginal fluids. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2010, 76, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sassi, A.B.; Isaacs, C.E.; Moncla, B.J.; Gupta, P.; Hillier, S.L.; Rohan, L.C. Effects of Physiological Fluids on Physical-Chemical Characteristics and Activity of Topical Vaginal Microbicide Products. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97, 3123–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dovnik, A.; Golle, A.; Novak, D.; Arko, D.; Takač, I. Treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: A review of the literature. Acta Dermatovenerol. Alp. Pannonica Adriat 2015, 24, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Crowley, P.D.; Gallagher, H.C. Clotrimazole as a pharmaceutical: Past, present and future. J Appl Microbiol. 2014, 117, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Regidor, P.A.; Thamkhantho, M.; Chayachinda, C.; Palacios, S. Miconazole for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. In vitro, in vivo and clinical results. Review of the literature. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2023, 43, 2195001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sawyer, P.R.; Brogden, R.N.; Pinder, R.M.; Speight, T.M.; Avery, G.S. Miconazole: A review of its antifungal activity and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 1975, 9, 406–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sobel, R.; Sobel, J.D. Metronidazole for the treatment of vaginal infections. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2015, 16, 1109–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cudmore, S.L.; Delgaty, K.L.; Hayward-McClelland, S.F.; Petrin, D.P.; Garber, G.E. Treatment of infections caused by metronidazole-resistant Trichomonas vaginalis. Clin. Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17, 783–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nailor, M.D.; Sobel, J.D. Tinidazole for the treatment of vaginal infections. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2007, 16, 743–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dickey, L.J.; Nailor, M.D.; Sobel, J.D. Guidelines for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: Focus on tinidazole. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2009, 5, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pappas, P.G.; Kauffman, C.A.; Andes, D.R.; Clancy, C.J.; Marr, K.A.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Reboli, A.C.; Schuster, M.G.; Vazquez, J.A.; Walsh, T.J.; et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, e1–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Suchodolski, J.; Muraszko, J.; Bernat, P.; Krasowska, A. Lactate Like Fluconazole Reduces Ergosterol Content in the Plasma Membrane and Synergistically Kills Candida albicans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bradbeer, C.S.; Mayhew, S.R.; Barlow, D. Butoconazole and miconazole in treating vaginal candidiasis. Genitourin. Med. 1985, 61, 270–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Heng, L.Z.; Chen, Y.; Tan, T.C. Treatment of recurrent vulvo-vaginal candidiasis with sustained-released butoconazole pessary. Singapore Med. J. 2012, 53, e269–e271. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bassi, P.; Kaur, G. Bioadhesive vaginal drug delivery of nystatin using a derivatized polymer: Development and characterization. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015, 96, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Récamier, K.S.; Hernández-Gómez, A.; González-Damián, J.; Ortega-Blake, I. Effect of membrane structure on the action of polyenes: I. Nystatin action in cholesterol- and ergosterol-containing membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 2010, 237, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Soper, D.E. CLINDAMYCIN. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North. Am. 1992, 19, 483–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Smieja, M. Current indications for the use of clindamycin: A critical review. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 1998, 9, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Prutting, S.M.; Cerveny, J.D. Boric acid vaginal suppositories: A brief review. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998, 6, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Thorley, N.; Ross, J. Intravaginal boric acid: Is it an alternative therapeutic option for vaginal trichomoniasis? Sex. Transm. Infect. 2018, 94, 574–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Donders, G.G.; Ruban, K.; Bellen, G. Selecting anti-microbial treatment of aerobic vaginitis. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2015, 17, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Flaxman, B.A.; Chopra, D.P.; Newman, D. Growth of mouse vaginal epithelial cells in vitro. In Vitro 1973, 9, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Valenta, C. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in vaginal delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57, 1692–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Acarturk, F. Mucoadhesive Vaginal Drug Delivery Systems. Recent Patents Drug Deliv. Formul. 2009, 3, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tumuhamye, J.; Steinsland, H.; Bwanga, F.; Tumwine, J.K.; Ndeezi, G.; Mukunya, D.; Namugga, O.; Kasede, A.N.; Sommerfelt, H.; Nankabirwa, V. Vaginal colonization with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria among women in labor in central Uganda: Prevalence and associated factors. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2021, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Uddin, T.M.; Chakraborty, A.J.; Khusro, A.; Zidan, B.R.M.; Mitra, S.; Emran, T.B.; Dhama, K.; Ripon, M.K.H.; Gajdács, M.; Sahibzada, M.U.K.; et al. Antibiotic resistance in microbes: History, mechanisms, therapeutic strategies and future prospects. J. Infect. Public Health 2021, 14, 1750–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Abreu, A.C.; McBain, A.J.; Simões, M. Plants as sources of new antimicrobials and resistance-modifying agents. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 1007–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Spížek, J.; Novotná, J.; Řezanka, T.; Demain, A.L. Do we need new antibiotics? The search for new targets and new compounds. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 37, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ibrahim, M.E.; Bilal, N.E.; Hamid, M. Increased multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli from hospitals in Khartoum state, Sudan. Afr. Health Sci. 2013, 12, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ahmed, A.A.; Karrar, Z.; Hassan, H.S.; Ahmed, A.B.; Musa, H.A.; Osman, H.; Mansour, A.M. Antimicrobial agent resistance in bacterial isolates from patients with diarrhea and urinary tract infection in the Sudan. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2000, 63, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Maisch, T. A New Strategy to Destroy Antibiotic Resistant Microorganisms: Antimicrobial Photodynamic Treatment. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 974–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Deurenberg, R.H.; Stobberingh, E.E. The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2008, 8, 747–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Beigi, R.H.; Austin, M.N.; Meyn, L.A.; Krohn, M.A.; Hillier, S.L. Antimicrobial resistance associated with the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 191, 1124–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Abbas, M.; Saeed, F.; Anjum, F.M.; Afzaal, M.; Tufail, T.; Bashir, M.S.; Ishtiaq, A.; Hussain, S.; Suleria, H.A.R. Natural polyphenols: An overview. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, 1689–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Othman, L.; Sleiman, A.; Abdel-Massih, R.M. Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenols and Alkaloids in Middle Eastern Plants. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Miller, J.S. The discovery of medicines from plants: A current biological perspective1. Econ. Bot. 2011, 65, 396–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Prabakaran, M.; Kim, S.-H.; Sasireka, A.; Chandrasekaran, M.; Chung, I.-M. Polyphenol composition and antimicrobial activity of various solvent extracts from different plant parts of Moringa oleifera. Food Biosci. 2018, 26, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Yang, Y.; Zhang, T. Antimicrobial Activities of Tea Polyphenol on Phytopathogens: A Review. Molecules 2019, 24, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Moreno, S.; Scheyer, T.; Romano, C.S.; Vojnov, A.A. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of rosemary extracts linked to their polyphenol composition. Free Radic. Res. 2006, 40, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Deepika; Maurya, P.K. Health Benefits of Quercetin in Age-Related Diseases. Molecules 2022, 27, 2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Di Petrillo, A.; Orrù, G.; Fais, A.; Fantini, M.C. Quercetin and its derivates as antiviral potentials: A comprehensive review. Phytother. Res. 2022, 36, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nguyen, T.L.A.; Bhattacharya, D. Antimicrobial Activity of Quercetin: An Approach to Its Mechanistic Principle. Molecules 2022, 27, 2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Giordani, B.; Basnet, P.; Mishchenko, E.; Luppi, B.; Škalko-Basnet, N. Utilizing Liposomal Quercetin and Gallic Acid in Localized Treatment of Vaginal Candida Infections. Pharmaceutics 2019, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, S.; Yao, J.; Zhou, B.; Yang, J.; Chaudry, M.T.; Wang, M.; Xiao, F.; Li, Y.; Yin, W. Bacteriostatic Effect of Quercetin as an Antibiotic Alternative In Vivo and Its Antibacterial Mechanism In Vitro. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Osonga, F.J.; Akgul, A.; Miller, R.M.; Eshun, G.B.; Yazgan, I.; Akgul, A.; Sadik, O.A. Antimicrobial Activity of a New Class of Phosphorylated and Modified Flavonoids. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 12865–12871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Shu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Feng, J.; Lou, B.; Zhou, X.; Wu, H. Antibacterial activity of quercetin on oral infectious pathogens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 5358–5361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, K.; Xing, S.; Wang, M.; Peng, Y.; Dong, Y.; Li, X. Anticomplement and Antimicrobial Activities of Flavonoids from Entada phaseoloides. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Jaisinghani, R.N. Antibacterial properties of quercetin. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Herrera, C.L.; Alvear, M.; Barrientos, L.; Montenegro, G.; Salazar, L.A. The antifungal effect of six commercial extracts of Chilean propolis on Candida spp. Cienc. E Investig. Agrar. 2010, 37, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pezzuto, J.M. Resveratrol: Twenty Years of Growth, Development and Controversy. Biomol. Ther. 2019, 27, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Alesci, A.; Nicosia, N.; Fumia, A.; Giorgianni, F.; Santini, A.; Cicero, N. Resveratrol and Immune Cells: A Link to Improve Human Health. Molecules 2022, 27, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Gowd, V.; Kanika; Jori, C.; Chaudhary, A.A.; Rudayni, H.A.; Rashid, S.; Khan, R. Resveratrol and resveratrol nano-delivery systems in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2022, 109, 109101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gambini, J.; Inglés, M.; Olaso, G.; Lopez-Grueso, R.; Bonet-Costa, V.; Gimeno-Mallench, L.; Mas-Bargues, C.; Abdelaziz, K.M.; Gomez-Cabrera, M.C.; Vina, J.; et al. Properties of Resveratrol: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies about Metabolism, Bioavailability, and Biological Effects in Animal Models and Humans. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2015, 2015, 837042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jøraholmen, M.W.; Johannessen, M.; Gravningen, K.; Puolakkainen, M.; Acharya, G.; Basnet, P.; Škalko-Basnet, N. Liposomes-In-Hydrogel Delivery System Enhances the Potential of Resveratrol in Combating Vaginal Chlamydia Infection. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wu, S.-X.; Xiong, R.-G.; Huang, S.-Y.; Zhou, D.-D.; Saimaiti, A.; Zhao, C.-N.; Shang, A.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Gan, R.-Y.; Li, H.-B. Effects and mechanisms of resveratrol for prevention and management of cancers: An updated review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 63, 12422–12440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Jang, M.; Cai, L.; Udeani, G.O.; Slowing, K.V.; Thomas, C.F.; Beecher, C.W.W.; Fong, H.H.S.; Farnsworth, N.R.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Mehta, R.G.; et al. Cancer Chemopreventive Activity of Resveratrol, a Natural Product Derived from Grapes. Science 1997, 275, 218–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Elshaer, M.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.J.; Tang, X. Resveratrol: An overview of its anti-cancer mechanisms. Life Sci. 2018, 207, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Rauf, A.; Imran, M.; Butt, M.S.; Nadeem, M.; Peters, D.G.; Mubarak, M.S. Resveratrol as an anti-cancer agent: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 1428–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ren, B.; Kwah, M.X.-Y.; Liu, C.; Ma, Z.; Shanmugam, M.K.; Ding, L.; Xiang, X.; Ho, P.C.-L.; Wang, L.; Ong, P.S.; et al. Resveratrol for cancer therapy: Challenges and future perspectives. Cancer Lett. 2021, 515, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Vestergaard, M.; Ingmer, H. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of resveratrol. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2019, 53, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jung, H.J.; Hwang, I.A.; Sung, W.S.; Kang, H.; Kang, B.S.; Seu, Y.B.; Lee, D.G. Fungicidal Effect of Resveratrol on Human Infectious Fungi. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2005, 28, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chan, M.M.-Y. Antimicrobial effect of resveratrol on dermatophytes and bacterial pathogens of the skin. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 63, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Docherty, J.J.; Fu, M.M.; Tsai, M. Resveratrol selectively inhibits Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001, 47, 243–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Paulo, L.; Ferreira, S.; Gallardo, E.; Queiroz, J.A.; Domingues, F. Antimicrobial activity and effects of resveratrol on human pathogenic bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 1533–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tegos, G.; Stermitz, F.R.; Lomovskaya, O.; Lewis, K. Multidrug Pump Inhibitors Uncover Remarkable Activity of Plant Antimicrobials. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 3133–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Wianowska, D.; Olszowy-Tomczyk, M. A Concise Profile of Gallic Acid—From Its Natural Sources through Biological Properties and Chemical Methods of Determination. Molecules 2023, 28, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Bai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, C.; Hou, Y.; Ai, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Meng, X. Gallic acid: Pharmacological activities and molecular mechanisms involved in inflammation-related diseases. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 133, 110985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Bhuia, M.S.; Rahaman, M.M.; Islam, T.; Bappi, M.H.; Sikder, M.I.; Hossain, K.N.; Akter, F.; Al Shamsh Prottay, A.; Rokonuzzman, M.; Gürer, E.S.; et al. Neurobiological effects of gallic acid: Current perspectives. Chin Med. 2023, 18, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gao, J.; Hu, J.; Hu, D.; Yang, X. A Role of Gallic Acid in Oxidative Damage Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1934578X1987417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Cossu, A.; Ercan, D.; Wang, Q.; Peer, W.A.; Nitin, N.; Tikekar, R.V. Antimicrobial effect of synergistic interaction between UV-A light and gallic acid against Escherichia coli O157:H7 in fresh produce wash water and biofilm. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 37, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lu, Z.; Nie, G.; Belton, P.S.; Tang, H.; Zhao, B. Structure–activity relationship analysis of antioxidant ability and neuroprotective effect of gallic acid derivatives. Neurochem. Int. 2006, 48, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Sorrentino, E.; Succi, M.; Tipaldi, L.; Pannella, G.; Maiuro, L.; Sturchio, M.; Coppola, R.; Tremonte, P. Antimicrobial activity of gallic acid against food-related Pseudomonas strains and its use as biocontrol tool to improve the shelf life of fresh black truffles. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 266, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Borges, A.; Ferreira, C.; Saavedra, M.J.; Simões, M. Antibacterial Activity and Mode of Action of Ferulic and Gallic Acids Against Pathogenic Bacteria. Microb. Drug Resist. 2013, 19, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jayaraman, P.; Sakharkar, M.K.; Lim, C.S.; Tang, T.H.; Sakharkar, K.R. Activity and interactions of antibiotic and phytochemical combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 6, 556–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Shao, D.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Tang, R.; Liu, L.; Shi, J.; Huang, Q.; Yang, H. Inhibition of Gallic Acid on the Growth and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli and Streptococcus mutans. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M1299–M1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Robles, H. Tannic Acid. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 474–475. [Google Scholar]
  134. Andrade, R.G., Jr.; Dalvi, L.T.; Silva, J.M.C., Jr.; Lopes, G.K.; Alonso, A.; Hermes-Lima, M. The antioxidant effect of tannic acid on the in vitro copper-mediated formation of free radicals. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2005, 437, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Chaplin, A.J. Tannic Acid in Histology: An Historical Perspective. Stain. Technol. 1985, 60, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Kaczmarek, B. Tannic Acid with Antiviral and Antibacterial Activity as A Promising Component of Biomaterials—A Minireview. Materials 2020, 13, 3224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Kim, T.; Silva, J.; Kim, M.; Jung, Y. Enhanced antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity of tannic acid by thermal processing. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 740–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Dong, G.; Liu, H.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X.; Lu, H.; Zhou, T.; Cao, J. Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity of tannic acid against Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 32, 2225–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lee, J.-H.; Park, J.-H.; Cho, H.S.; Joo, S.W.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, J. Anti-biofilm activities of quercetin and tannic acid against Staphylococcus aureus. Biofouling 2013, 29, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Moreira, L.E.A.; de Farias Cabral, V.P.; Rodrigues, D.S.; Barbosa, A.D.; Silveira, M.J.C.B.; Coutinho, T.D.N.P.; Barbosa, S.A.; Sá, L.G.D.A.V.; de Andrade Neto, J.B.; da Rocha, S.N.C.; et al. Antifungal activity of tannic acid against Candida spp. and its mechanism of action. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2024, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lopes, G.K.; Schulman, H.M.; Hermes-Lima, M. Polyphenol tannic acid inhibits hydroxyl radical formation from Fenton reaction by complexing ferrous ions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1999, 1472, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Dash, J.R.; Pattnaik, G.; Ghosh, G.; Rath, G.; Kar, B. Protective effect of epicatechin in diabetic-induced peripheral neuropathy: A review. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 13, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hid, E.J.; Mosele, J.I.; Prince, P.D.; Fraga, C.G.; Galleano, M. (−)-Epicatechin and cardiometabolic risk factors: A focus on potential mechanisms of action. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2021, 474, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Prakash, M.; Basavaraj, B.; Murthy, K.C. Biological functions of epicatechin: Plant cell to human cell health. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kopustinskienė, D.M.; Bernatonienė, J.; Jakštas, V.; Morkūnienė, R. Catechins, neuroprotection, and brain mitochondria. In Mitochondrial Physiology and Vegetal Molecules: Therapeutic Potential of Natural Compounds on Mitochondrial Health; de Oliveira, M.R., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2021; pp. 455–470. [Google Scholar]
  146. Bernatova, I. Biological activities of (−)-epicatechin and (−)-epicatechin-containing foods: Focus on cardiovascular and neuropsychological health. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 666–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Gupta, R.; Ramteke, P.W. Antimicrobial activity of Emblica officinalis, Saraca indica and Terminalia arjuna against Multi-Drug Resistant MDR Bacterial Pathogens. Hacet. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 39, 435–437. [Google Scholar]
  148. Gibbons, S.; Moser, E.; Kaatz, G.W. Catechin Gallates Inhibit Multidrug Resistance (MDR) in Staphylococcus aureus. Planta Med. 2004, 70, 1240–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Roccaro, A.S.; Blanco, A.R.; Giuliano, F.; Rusciano, D.; Enea, V. Epigallocatechin-Gallate Enhances the Activity of Tetracycline in Staphylococci by Inhibiting Its Efflux from Bacterial Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1968–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Li, Z.; Feng, C.; Dong, H.; Jin, W.; Zhang, W.; Zhan, J.; Wang, S. Health promoting activities and corresponding mechanism of (–)-epicatechin-3-gallate. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2022, 11, 568–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. World Health Organization Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance (accessed on 8 June 2023).
  152. Romandini, A.; Pani, A.; Schenardi, P.A.; Pattarino, G.A.C.; De Giacomo, C.; Scaglione, F. Antibiotic Resistance in Pediatric Infections: Global Emerging Threats, Predicting the Near Future. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Lima, M.; de Sousa, C.P.; Fernandez-Prada, C.; Harel, J.; Dubreuil, J.; de Souza, E. A review of the current evidence of fruit phenolic compounds as potential antimicrobials against pathogenic bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 130, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Murthy, N.T.V.; Agrahari, V.; Chauhan, H. Polyphenols against infectious diseases: Controlled release nano-formulations. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2021, 161, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Castro, M.L.; Ferreira, J.P.; Pintado, M.; Ramos, O.L.; Borges, S.; Baptista-Silva, S. Grape By-Products in Sustainable Cosmetics: Nanoencapsulation and Market Trends. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Ci, L.; Huang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wei, G.; Lu, W. Amino-functionalized poloxamer 407 with both mucoadhesive and thermosensitive properties: Preparation, characterization and application in a vaginal drug delivery system. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2017, 7, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Chen, Z.; Farag, M.A.; Zhong, Z.; Zhang, C.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y. Multifaceted role of phyto-derived polyphenols in nanodrug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 176, 113870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Pu, M.; Song, X.; Yu, L.; Yan, X.; Wu, J.; He, Z. Innovations and challenges of polyphenol-based smart drug delivery systems. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 8156–8184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Kim, K.H.; Ki, M.-R.; Min, K.H.; Pack, S.P. Advanced Delivery System of Polyphenols for Effective Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Lu, W.; Kelly, A.L.; Miao, S. Emulsion-based encapsulation and delivery systems for polyphenols. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 47, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Qi, C.; Liu, G.; Ping, Y.; Yang, K.; Tan, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, G.; Huang, X.; Xu, D. A comprehensive review of nano-delivery system for tea polyphenols: Construction, applications, and challenges. Food Chem. X 2023, 17, 100571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Jøraholmen, M.W.; Škalko-Basnet, N.; Acharya, G.; Basnet, P. Resveratrol-loaded liposomes for topical treatment of the vaginal inflammation and infections. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 79, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Schlich, M.; Lai, F.; Pireddu, R.; Pini, E.; Ailuno, G.; Fadda, A.; Valenti, D.; Sinico, C. Resveratrol proniosomes as a convenient nanoingredient for functional food. Food Chem. 2020, 310, 125950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Imran, M.; Iqubal, M.K.; Imtiyaz, K.; Saleem, S.; Mittal, S.; Rizvi, M.M.A.; Ali, J.; Baboota, S. Topical nanostructured lipid carrier gel of quercetin and resveratrol: Formulation, optimization, in vitro and ex vivo study for the treatment of skin cancer. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 587, 119705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Tsai, M.-J.; Lu, I.-J.; Fu, Y.-S.; Fang, Y.-P.; Huang, Y.-B.; Wu, P.-C. Nanocarriers enhance the transdermal bioavailability of resveratrol: In-vitro and in-vivo study. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 148, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Pentek, T.; Newenhouse, E.; O’Brien, B.; Chauhan, A.S. Development of a Topical Resveratrol Formulation for Commercial Applications Using Dendrimer Nanotechnology. Molecules 2017, 22, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Minnelli, C.; Laudadio, E.; Galeazzi, R.; Barucca, G.; Notarstefano, V.; Cantarini, M.; Armeni, T.; Mobbili, G. Encapsulation of a neutral molecule into a cationic clay material: Structural insight and cytotoxicity of resveratrol/layered double hydroxide/BSA nanocomposites. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Li, C.; Wang, X.; Li, R.; Yang, X.; Zhong, Z.; Dai, Y.; Fan, Q.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liang, T.; et al. Resveratrol-loaded PLGA nanoparticles functionalized with red blood cell membranes as a biomimetic delivery system for prolonged circulation time. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 101369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Number of papers included in the PubMed database related to VIs and polyphenols, according to the presented search words (search date: July 2024).
Figure 1. Number of papers included in the PubMed database related to VIs and polyphenols, according to the presented search words (search date: July 2024).
Applsci 14 09203 g001
Figure 2. Main polyphenols covered in this review.
Figure 2. Main polyphenols covered in this review.
Applsci 14 09203 g002
Figure 3. Polyphenols in advanced delivery systems for vaginal administration.
Figure 3. Polyphenols in advanced delivery systems for vaginal administration.
Applsci 14 09203 g003
Table 2. Drug delivery systems used for the delivery of polyphenols and their advantages/applications.
Table 2. Drug delivery systems used for the delivery of polyphenols and their advantages/applications.
Drug Delivery SystemMaterialLoaded CompoundAdvantages/
Application
Experiment TypeReference Source
LiposomesChitosanResveratrolApprox. 75% encapsulation
efficiency; Topical treatment of vaginal inflammation and infections
In vitroJoraholmen 2015 [162]
NiosomesTween 20/Span 60
(surfactants) and
cholesterol
ResveratrolMinimal cytotoxicityIn vitroSchlich 2020 [163]
NanoparticlesNLC: 1% lipid mix (Labrafil M 2125CS and Labrafil M 2130CS); Aqueous phase (5% Cremophor RH40 in distilled water)Resveratrol and quercetinImproved disposition in dermal and epidermal layers; resveratrol encapsulation close to 90%In vitro; Ex vivoImran 2020 [164]
NanoparticlesPLGA; red blood cell membranesResveratrolIncreased half-life and mean residence timeIn vitroLi 2019 [168]
NanoemulsionsCaproyl 90/isopropyl myristate (oil phase); Propylene glycol and ethanol (cosurfactants)ResveratrolIncreased transdermal and deposition in skinIn vitro; In vivoTsai 2016 [165]
DendrimersPolyamidoamideResveratrolEnhanced solubility and stability; more efficiency in loading and skin penetrationIn vitro; Ex vivoPentek 2017 [166]
Nanocompositesbovine serum albumin-coated layered double hydroxide (LDH–BSA)ResveratrolBetter encapsulation efficiencyIn vitroMinnelli 2020 [167]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Apolinário, E.; Castro, M.L.; Pintado, M.; Ferreira, J.P.; Baptista-Silva, S.; Borges, S. Endowed Polyphenols in Advanced Delivery Systems for Vaginal Infections. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209203

AMA Style

Apolinário E, Castro ML, Pintado M, Ferreira JP, Baptista-Silva S, Borges S. Endowed Polyphenols in Advanced Delivery Systems for Vaginal Infections. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(20):9203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Apolinário, Eduardo, Maria Leonor Castro, Manuela Pintado, João Paulo Ferreira, Sara Baptista-Silva, and Sandra Borges. 2024. "Endowed Polyphenols in Advanced Delivery Systems for Vaginal Infections" Applied Sciences 14, no. 20: 9203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop