Next Article in Journal
Meta4CBC: Metamodel for Competency-Based Curriculum Design in Higher Education
Next Article in Special Issue
Acute Effects of a Single-Bout Session of High-Intensity Functional Training and Moderate-Intensity Functional Training on Cognitive Functions, Anxiety, and Stress in Healthy Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Flexibility in Aluminium Smelting: A Long-Term Feasibility Study Based on the Prospects of Electricity Load and Photovoltaic Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association between Resting Heart Rate and Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance in South Korean Adults
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Importance of Electrolytes in Exercise Performance and Assessment Methodology After Heat Training: A Narrative Review

by
Marcos S. Keefe
1,
Courteney L. Benjamin
2,
Douglas J. Casa
3 and
Yasuki Sekiguchi
1,*
1
Sports Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
2
Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA
3
Department of Kinesiology, Korey Stringer Institute, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10103; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210103
Submission received: 25 September 2024 / Revised: 26 October 2024 / Accepted: 29 October 2024 / Published: 5 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sports Medicine, Exercise, and Health: Latest Advances and Prospects)

Abstract

:
Performing exercise in hot environmental conditions presents athletes with potential negative physiological and perceptual implications. Key constituents, such as fluid and electrolytes, are lost during sweating through the process of cooling the human body. The loss of electrolytes impairs exercise performance. Heat training is one strategy to combat sweat electrolyte loss, with decreased sweat electrolyte concentration being a main sudomotor adaptation. To measure sweat electrolyte concentration, two common assessment methods are typically utilized: whole-body washdown and regional sweat patch measurements. The effects of physiological adaptations and sweat electrolyte assessment methodology have been investigated; however, the importance of methodological differences between sweat electrolyte measurements following heat training has yet to be explored. This review explores the differences between sweat electrolyte measurement techniques following adaptations incurred with heat training. Future research directions are also provided.

1. Introduction

Exercise performance in hot environmental conditions is compromised due to increased physiological strain, compared to when undertaken in temperate or cool conditions [1,2,3]. While exercising in the heat, central and peripheral thermosensitivity mechanisms control body temperature regulation [4]. Sensory thermoreceptors transmit signals to the preoptic anterior hypothalamus (POAH) in response to increased core temperature, thereby initiating independent thermoeffector loops to elicit thermoregulatory sweating in an effort to cool the body through heat dissipation [4,5]. However, this sudomotor response is accompanied by a loss of electrolytes (i.e., sodium [Na+], chloride [Cl], and potassium [K+]) in the sweat [6]. Electrolytes are critical substances that aid with maintaining water balance by shifting fluid between intracellular and extracellular compartments, maintaining membrane electrochemical potentials, and transporting nutrients into and waste out of the cell [7]. The loss of electrolytes in sweat and subsequent fluid imbalances often lead to hypohydration, which negatively influences exercise performance, health, and thermoregulatory mechanisms [8,9,10] (Figure 1).
The physiological actions of electrolytes operate in both the extracellular compartments of the blood and intracellular compartments within the cell. During exercise in the heat, several physiological impairments occur as a result of reduced plasma electrolyte concentrations from the increased electrolyte concentrations lost in sweat [11]. For example, increases in plasma osmolality occur because plasma Na+ (Na+p) and Cl (Clp) are directly associated with plasma osmolality, as they are the primary regulators of extracellular volume and function to maintain water absorption [11,12,13]. In addition, plasma volume is partially regulated by Na+p and Clp, as these electrolytes exert osmotic pressure and redistribute fluid between the blood and cells [11]. Consequently, plasma volume reductions may be observed due to the increased electrolyte concentration lost in sweat as opposed to circulating in plasma. Furthermore, it has been suggested that there may be a relationship between electrolytes and the neuromuscular properties associated with exercise performance (i.e., skeletal muscle membrane potential, exercise-induced muscle cramps [EIMC]) [14,15]. Indeed, muscle tissue is composed of approximately 76% water, with electrolytes being a primary modulator of water flux [16]; however, it is difficult to surmise the impact of this as it remains under contention amongst the scientific community and requires more research [15,17]. Collectively, electrolyte imbalances due to exercise in the heat can lead to various physiological impairments.
Blood flow patterns experience significant alterations during exercise compared to resting conditions [18]. When an individual performs exercise, particularly under thermal stress, blood circulation to the skin can increase by as much as 30–40% in healthy young men as part of the body’s efforts at temperature regulation [18]. This increased skin blood flow leads to a higher concentration of plasma electrolytes and blood in the dermis, which is the skin layer composed of collagen, elastic tissue, and extracellular components, including blood vessels, nerve endings, and eccrine glands [19]. The secretion of sweat occurs within the dermis in the secretory coils and proximal ducts, more precisely following the Na-K-2Cl cotransport model within the clear cells of the secretory coil [20]. When the POAH signals for sweating to occur, acetylcholine is released from sympathetic post-ganglionic neurons and binds to muscarinic receptors on the basolateral membrane of the clear cells [20]. This initiates the release of intracellular calcium (Ca2+) stores and an influx of extracellular Ca2+ into the cell’s cytoplasm [20]. Following this, an efflux of K+ via K+ channels on the basolateral membrane and Cl through Cl channels on the apical membrane occurs, thus causing cell shrinkage [20]. This cell shrinkage leads to an inflow of Na+, K+, and Cl through Na-K-2Cl cotransporters on the basolateral membrane and, subsequently, an efflux of Na+ and K+ through Na-K-ATPase and K+ channels into the extracellular space, along with an efflux of Cl through Cl channels into the lumen [20]. The increased Cl concentration in the lumen creates an electrochemical gradient that promotes the movement of Na+ across the cell junction [20,21,22]. In turn, this leads to a net efflux of K+ and Cl from the cell, creating an osmotic gradient for the movement of water into the lumen via aquaporin-5 channels [20,23,24,25]. Lastly, the water and electrolytes transported into the lumen combine to form primary sweat. This entire process elucidates how electrolytes from the blood are utilized in the formation of sweat.
The homeostasis of body fluid regulation and electrolyte excretion via sweat glands during and after exercise in the heat is also impacted by aldosterone and antidiuretic hormone, as well as sympathetic nervous system activity. Aldosterone is a mineralocorticoid hormone whose primary function is water and Na+ regulation via reabsorption in the kidney, specifically the late distal tubules and collecting ducts of nephrons [26]. The antidiuretic hormone is typically co-released with aldosterone, whereby it supports the extracellular fluid reabsorption of water through the mobilization of aquaporin channels to the apical membrane of the collecting tubule [26]. During exercise in the heat, aldosterone and antidiuretic hormone secretions are increased, which promotes water and Na+ reabsorption in the kidneys and counteracts the loss of fluids and electrolyte caused by sweating [27]. In contrast, sympathetic nervous system activity modulates fluid regulation during exercise in the heat by activating sweat glands to excrete fluid via sweating [28]. This function is imperative to allow for adequate heat dissipation, but it subsequently results in fluid and electrolyte losses. Therefore, the body is in a constant flux of fluid and electrolyte reabsorption (i.e., aldosterone and the antidiuretic hormone) and excretion (i.e., sympathetic nervous system activity).
The loss of electrolytes via sweating, along with several other decremental physiological responses from exercising in the heat, has been investigated in the hope of reducing these effects. A popular strategy that has been explored is the implementation of heat training, either via heat acclimation (HA; training in a hot artificial environment) or heat acclimatization (HAz; training in a naturally hot environment). One of the positive adaptations that occurs with heat training is reduced electrolyte concentrations in the sweat, inferring that more electrolytes are kept in the blood, possibly due to improved reabsorption within the proximal duct during sweat secretion. As primary sweat propagates in the lumen towards the skin surface, Na+ and Cl are reabsorbed via the luminal and basal cells of the duct [20]. This results in the final form of sweat being hypotonic; however, there still remain electrolytes in the sweat that is then lost on the skin’s surface. Investigation into the heat training adaptation of reduced electrolytes in the sweat has been carried out using various methodologies.
Sweat electrolyte loss can be measured via two methods: (1) the whole-body washdown (WBW) technique and (2) regional sweat patch measurements (Figure 2). WBW determines whole-body sweat electrolyte losses, whereas regional sweat patch measurements determine sweat electrolyte loss at specific anatomical sites [29]. The WBW technique is considered the gold standard and most accurate measure of whole-body sweat electrolyte loss, which is attributed to all sweat runoff being collected/accounted for and a lack of interference with the normal evaporative sweating process [30]. An itemized list, instructions, and an example document on proper execution of the WBW technique have previously been reported [31]. Although WBW is the gold standard for sweat electrolyte assessment, variations still remain in Na+ sweat concentrations. The alternative assessment method, regional sweat patches, uses predictive equations to estimate whole-body sweat electrolyte losses from various anatomical sites [30,32]. Although these predictive equations have been validated [30], the validity of regional sweat patch measurements is limited due to sweat composition and sweat rate variations across regions of the body [33]. In addition, the patch suppresses sweat evaporation in that specific anatomical area and sweat collected from occlusive coverings may represent false increased electrolyte concentrations due to electrolyte leaching from the stratum corneum of the skin [30,34]. It has been noted that sweat patches usually overestimate sweat loss concentrations [30]. However, a recent cross-validation study conducted by Baker and colleagues (2019) confirmed the validity of predictive equations to predict whole-body sweat Na+ concentrations from regional sweat patch measurements [6]. Another matter to note is that there are different methodological sweat patch assessments utilizing either single or multiple patch sites for collection [29,35,36,37]. This demonstrates the importance of considering which sites are being measured, and if those predictive equations have been validated in the literature. However, regional sweat patches are still utilized in research and professional settings as they provide the advantage of being more readily available for field settings and in situations where there is a limited budget.
Numerous original research studies and reviews have been conducted discussing sweat electrolyte concentration and losses during exercise, along with methodological assessments to measure sweat electrolytes (whole-body washdown vs. regional sweat patches) [6,29,30,33,38,39,40,41]. However, there are no current reviews available, to the authors’ knowledge, on electrolyte concentration adaptations from heat training and differences in assessment results dependent on the method employed. Therefore, the objective of this review was to explore the differences between sweat electrolyte measurement techniques from the adaptations incurred following heat training.

2. Search Strategy

All literature examining sweat electrolyte adaptations, following heat training utilizing the WBW technique and/or regional sweat patches, was searched between December 2022 and May 2024 in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Keywords included ‘heat training’, ‘heat acclimation’, ‘acclimatization’, ‘heat adaptation’, ‘thermal adaptation’, ‘passive heating’, ‘electrolyte’, ‘sodium’, ‘potassium’, ‘chloride’, and ‘sweat’. Subject headings were used independently and in combination. With the initial article search, only full-text, peer-reviewed articles with human participants and published in the English language were selected. Furthermore, review articles, abstracts, case/single studies, unpublished theses, conference papers, and editorials were not included. During abstract and full-text reviewing, only articles utilizing the WBW technique or regional sweat patches to analyze sweat electrolyte adaptation from heat training were included for discussion.

3. Whole-Body Washdown

Four studies investigated sweat electrolyte adaptations following heat training using the WBW method [42,43,44,45] (Table 1). Of these four studies, two were part of the same larger cohort study [42,43]. One of these two investigated sweat electrolyte adaptations following HAz and HA + HAz [42], whereas the other study investigated sweat electrolyte adaptations after an intermittent heat training protocol following an HA protocol [43]. Another study investigated sweat electrolyte adaptations following an HAz period of summer running in the northeastern United States [44]. Lastly, the other study measured sweat electrolyte adaptations when testing the effects of bromocriptine on sweat gland function following an HA protocol, but also included a control group that did not ingest the bromocriptine [45]. All four of these studies measured Na+ and K+, whereas only the two Benjamin et al. (2021 and 2022) studies additionally measured Cl.
From the Benjamin et al. (2021 and 2022) study, participants performed both an HAz and HA protocol, resulting in two separate time points of adaptation measurements: post-HAz and post-HAz + HA. The HAz protocol involved self-directed summer training for approximately 109 ± 9 days. Following this, participants completed a 5-day HA protocol. Significant reductions were noted in Na+ and Cl post-HAz + HA compared to both baseline and post-HAz measurements, demonstrating adaptations from HA [42]. However, no significant differences were seen between the baseline and post-HAz, suggesting HAz may not be a strong enough stimulus by itself to induce sweat electrolyte adaptation. Indeed, the HAz protocol involved participants performing self-directed summer training and average WBGT temperatures were ~22.5 °C, thus potentially not being a strong enough stimulus [42].
From the same overall study, intermittent heat training (IHT) was implemented to combat decay and maintain physiological adaptations following HAz + HA [43]. Participants completed 0, 1, or 2 days of heat training per week for a total of 8 weeks, with adaptations being measured after 4 and 8 weeks. Interestingly, there was no sweat electrolyte concentration maintenance for Na+ or Cl with both IHT protocols [43]. K+ was maintained throughout the 8 weeks; however, this conservation did not seem to be because of the IHT as even the control group experienced the same K+ maintenance. At the week 4 and 8 time points, Na+ and Cl concentrations were higher compared to post-HAz + HA across all conditions. These findings suggest that IHT may not be effective in maintaining sweat electrolyte adaptations, but K+ may be maintained after HA even without IHT [43].
Armstrong et al. (1987) found no adaptations following a summer HAz protocol, for both sweat and plasma electrolyte concentrations [44]. Highly trained distance runners trained during the summer months in the northeastern United States for 14.5 weeks. Although no adaptations were noticed, this was likely due to the moderate temperature conditions not being hot enough to induce appropriate stimulus for adaptation to occur. Indeed, only 3 days of the 14.5 weeks HAz had a maximum daily temperature above 30.3 °C, with most of the mean maximum temperatures ranging between ~20 and 30 °C. Most HA research utilizes temperatures above 35 °C in order to induce adequate stimulus for adaptation [64]. Extended time with an internal body temperature above 38.5 °C is suggested to be a factor in inducing physiological adaptations for performance in the heat [64]. This may partly explain why no physiological adaptations, including sweat and plasma electrolyte concentrations, were seen in this study. In contrast, Kaufman et al. (1988) saw a decreased concentration of sweat Na+ following a 10-day HA protocol, but no significant decrease in K+ [45]. The sweat electrolyte adaptation is likely linked to the improved core temperature that the control group experienced from the HA protocol.

4. Regional Sweat Patches

When investigating the effects of HA on electrolyte preservation, most studies examine these adaptations using regional sweat patch measurement, which may demonstrate differences in sweat responses depending on regional body area [65]. Traditional HA protocols are typically characterized by either endurance-based cycling or running exercises. Although both are endurance-based types of exercise, running utilizes more whole-body movement compared to cycling. Thus, regional sweat rates may differ between exercise types, with more sweat potentially being lost in the lower extremities during cycling compared to running since most movement occurs in the leg musculature [66]. However, there seem to be limited to no differences in sweat electrolyte adaptation between HA protocols of cycling versus running [40,42,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59].
From one of the earlier studies that investigated sweat electrolyte adaptations and HA, Kirby and Convertino (1986) found increases in sweat Na+ reabsorption via sweat patches at the chest site, explained by the authors as eccrine gland responsiveness to plasma aldosterone, following a 10-day cycling HA protocol [49]. Significant reductions in sweat Na+ were noted after the 10 days during both the first and second hour of exercise [49]. In addition, plasma aldosterone concentrations were reduced following HA, which partially demonstrates the sweat Na+ adaptation. As the chest regional site has been shown to be one of the best sites for predicting whole-body sweat, deductions from this study can be deemed accurate for the determination of sweat electrolyte concentration adaptations. Other investigations have also chosen the chest site for sweat patch placement [47]. Following an 8-day HA cycling protocol, young males, highly fit old males, and normally fit old males collectively experienced sweat Na+ reductions at several regional sites (chest, back, forearm, and thigh) [47]. The younger males experienced these adaptations at all four sites, whereas the highly fit older males did not experience these reductions at the forearm and thigh sites, nor did the normally fit older males experience these reductions at the back and forearm sites [47].
Several investigations have determined sweat electrolyte adaptation from HA using the upper back and upper arm regional sites [48,50,51,54,55,57,60], with all but one demonstrating positive adaptation [60]. Although significant differences were not seen overall, the researchers did note that a pre–post-training reduction in sweat Na+ was observed in 13 of the total 17 participants, suggesting some changes had occurred [60]. Additionally, another study utilized regional sweat patches for electrolyte assessment and observed conserved Na+ following HA; however, the authors did not specify where the patch was regionally located [59].
In field or laboratory settings when skin sites might be restricted due to clothing, a forearm single-site measurement is typically attained. Petersen et al. (2010) measured sweat electrolyte loss with sweat patches at a single site, the upper forearm [56]. Following a short-term 4-day HA protocol, male cricket club players exhibited substantial decreases in sweat Na+, K+, and Cl concentrations [56]. Although this study involved only 4 days of HA, reductions were still noted, providing evidence that sweat electrolyte adaptations may begin within the first couple of days. Similarly, reduced sweat Na+ was noted following 3 consecutive days of cycling-based heat training from sweat collected at the forearm site [53]. Thus, the forearm is likely a valid location for sweat electrolyte assessment in settings where clothing hinders other sites.
Non-traditional forms of heat training have also resulted in positive electrolyte adaptations via regional patch measurement [61,62]. In Australian football players, 2 weeks of traditional sport training in hot conditions improved sweat Na+ reductions [62]. Likewise, semi-professional soccer players completed a 6-day HAz protocol of their usual training cycle in the heat and also experienced decreases in sweat Na+ [61]. The practical application of regional sweat patches is highlighted by studies like these, where although the testing sessions were performed in laboratory settings, the protocols were field-based. Thus, it is surmisable that regional patches may also be utilized during actual training sessions to measure sweat electrolyte loss, allowing for more evidence-informed decisions regarding nutritional and hydration strategies.
A few studies within the same research group have used Macroduct sweat collectors on chest [46] and forearm [40] sites to assess sweat electrolyte concentration following medium-term HA (7 and 10 days) in healthy individuals. These sweat collectors function in the same manner as patches, being placed in the same sites for sample collection. Buono et al. (2007) assessed sweat electrolyte concentration while controlling for the effect of changes in sweat rate on sweat Na+ [46]. In doing so, sweat Na+ concentrations still decreased over the 10-day HA protocol, signifying that the adaptation is not attributable only to elevated sweat rate [46]. Similarly, this group again demonstrated that HA significantly reduces sweat Na+ concentration via improvements in Na+ ion reabsorption from eccrine sweat gland ducts [40].
Sweat electrolyte adaptation has also been investigated in tropical populations following HA using regional patches [52,58,63]. Previous research has demonstrated that tropical natives exhibit greater thermoregulation efficiency through less reliance on evaporative cooling mechanisms (i.e., sweating) [52,67,68]; thus, it is important to understand if this population experiences similar sudomotor adaptations as a result of HA. When accounting for tropical climates, Rivera-Brown and Quinones-Gonzalez (2020) provided sweat Na+ concentration normative values for athletes indigenous to these hot and humid climates, explaining ranges for low, low–average, average–high, and high [69]. From three known studies to the authors’ knowledge, two investigations noted reductions in sweat Na+ concentrations following medium-term HA protocols (10 and 11 days) [52,63]. In contrast, Saat et al. (2005) saw no differences in sweat Na+ or K+ from a 14-day HA protocol [58]. The lack of sweat electrolyte adaptation may partly be explained by the environmental conditions, specifically the relatively high 70% humidity level. During exercise in humid–hot conditions, characterized by reduced evaporative potential, heat loss mechanisms are altered by reduced heat loss through sweating compared to dry–hot conditions [70]. Subsequently, there was also no adaptation in the increased sweat rate. In the absence of an increased sweat rate, limited opportunity exists for electrolytes to be reabsorbed via sweat gland ducts as the final form of sweat is produced.

5. Future Directions and Limitations

The accuracy and application of the WBW technique has been well established as the gold standard for sweat electrolyte measurement. However, the use of this method has been less investigated in correspondence with HA protocols because of the limitations of field setting functionality. Therefore, future research should investigate sweat electrolyte concentration adaptations following HA comparing the WBW method to regional sweat patches. In addition, sex and age differences between WBW and regional sweat patches need to be explored due to the underrepresentation of females in exercise thermoregulation research and differences in thermoregulation between young and older individuals. Lastly, other electrolyte assessment modalities have been gaining attention due to emerging technology, such as microfluidic systems, and commercially available wearables [71,72,73,74]. Third-party reliability and validity studies should be conducted to compare these modalities to the WBW technique.
This review has summarized the current literature on sweat electrolyte adaptations following heat training utilizing either the WBW technique or regional sweat patches. However, this study was not without limitations. Narrative reviews inherently contain limitations regarding the objectivity of study selection and the interpretation of results [75]. Furthermore, no statistical analysis was executed to compare findings between studies that used the WBW technique to those that used regional sweat patches. We considered performing a meta-analysis but deemed it not appropriate as there is a large disparity in the number of studies between methodologies. However, this does result in a bias in the studies’ interpretation. Even so, we chose to include all studies from our search strategy and aimed to present this review in the most objective way possible.

6. Conclusions

Sweat electrolytes play a pivotal role in maintaining various physiological functions, optimizing exercise performance, and ensuring athlete safety. These electrolytes, mainly Na+, Cl, and K+, help regulate fluid balance and aid in cardiovascular and neuromuscular functionality. Therefore, it is essential to accurately measure sweat electrolyte loss during exercise to understand how to properly replace sweat electrolytes during and after exercise. While regional sweat patches are convenient in field settings, the WBW technique is the gold standard method for sweat electrolyte measurement, providing more precise and accurate readings. Using the WBW method ensures the accuracy of the data collected. Further research is needed to investigate the adaptations of sweat electrolyte concentrations induced by HA using the WBW method. This knowledge can provide valuable information to athletes, coaches, and sports scientists for the improved creation of individualized electrolyte replacement plans for optimal performance and safety during exercise.

Author Contributions

M.S.K.: writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; C.L.B.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing; D.J.C.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing; Y.S.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tyler, C.J.; Reeve, T.; Hodges, G.J.; Cheung, S.S. The Effects of Heat Adaptation on Physiology, Perception and Exercise Performance in the Heat: A Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2016, 46, 1699–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guy, J.H.; Deakin, G.B.; Edwards, A.M.; Miller, C.M.; Pyne, D.B. Adaptation to hot environmental conditions: An exploration of the performance basis, procedures and future directions to optimise opportunities for elite athletes. Sports Med. 2015, 45, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jones, P.R.; Barton, C.; Morrissey, D.; Maffulli, N.; Hemmings, S. Pre-cooling for endurance exercise performance in the heat: A systematic review. BMC Med. 2012, 10, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Romanovsky, A.A. Thermoregulation: Some concepts have changed. Functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2007, 292, R37–R46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, Z.-D.; Yang, W.Z.; Gao, C.; Fu, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, W.; Ni, X.; Lin, J.-K.; Yang, J.; et al. A hypothalamic circuit that controls body temperature. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2042–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Baker, L.B.; De Chavez, P.J.D.; Ungaro, C.T.; Sopeña, B.C.; Nuccio, R.P.; Reimel, A.J.; Barnes, K.A. Exercise intensity effects on total sweat electrolyte losses and regional vs. whole-body sweat [Na+], [Cl], and [K+]. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2019, 119, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. National Research Council (US). Subcommittee on the Tenth Edition of the Recommended Dietary Allowances. In Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed.; The National Academies Collection: Reports Funded by National Institutes of Health; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1989. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234932/ (accessed on 6 March 2023).
  8. Medicine, A.C.O.S.; Burke, L.M.; Eichner, E.R.; Maughan, R.J.; Montain, S.J.; Stachenfeld, N.S. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and fluid replacement. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 377–390. [Google Scholar]
  9. Casa, D.J.; Clarkson, P.M.; Roberts, W.O. American College of Sports Medicine Roundtable on Hydration and Physical Activity: Consensus Statements. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2005, 4, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; 617p. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sawka, M.N.; Montain, S.J. Fluid and electrolyte supplementation for exercise heat stress. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 564S–572S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Senay, L.C.; González-Alonso, J.; Mora-Rodríguez, R.; Below, P.R.; Coyle, E.F. Relationship of evaporative rates to serum [Na+], [K+], and osmolarity in acute heat stress. J. Appl. Physiol. 1968, 25, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kubica, R.; Nielsen, B.; Bonnesen, A.; Rasmussen, I.B.; Stokłosa, J.; Wilk, B. Relationship between plasma volume reduction and plasma electrolyte changes after prolonged bicycle exercise, passive heating and diuretic dehydration. Acta Physiol. Pol. 1983, 34, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Costill, D.L.; Coté, R.; Fink, W.J.; Van Handel, P. Muscle water and electrolyte distribution during prolonged exercise. Int. J. Sports Med. 1981, 2, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Miller, K.C.; McDermott, B.P.; Yeargin, S.W.; Fiol, A.; Schwellnus, M.M.P. An Evidence-Based Review of the Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Prevention of Exercise-Associated Muscle Cramps. J. Athl. Train. 2022, 57, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lorenzo, I.; Serra-Prat, M.; Yébenes, J.C. The Role of Water Homeostasis in Muscle Function and Frailty: A Review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maughan, R.J.; Shirreffs, S.M. Muscle Cramping During Exercise: Causes, Solutions, and Questions Remaining. Sports Med. 2019, 49 (Suppl. S2), 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Joyner, M.J.; Casey, D.P. Regulation of increased blood flow (hyperemia) to muscles during exercise: A hierarchy of competing physiological needs. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 549–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brown, T.M.; Krishnamurthy, K. Histology, Dermis; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535346/ (accessed on 7 November 2023).
  20. Baker, L.B. Physiology of sweat gland function: The roles of sweating and sweat composition in human health. Temperature 2019, 6, 211–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Sato, K.; Ohtsuyama, M.; Samman, G. Eccrine sweat gland disorders. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1991, 24 Pt 1, 1010–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sato, K. The mechanism of eccrine sweat secretion. In Exercise, Heat, and Thermoregulation; Brown & Benchmark: Dubuque, IA, USA, 1993; pp. 85–117. [Google Scholar]
  23. Inoue, R.; Sohara, E.; Rai, T.; Satoh, T.; Yokozeki, H.; Sasaki, S.; Uchida, S. Immunolocalization and translocation of aquaporin-5 water channel in sweat glands. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2013, 70, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nejsum, L.N.; Kwon, T.-H.; Jensen, U.B.; Fumagalli, O.; Frøkiaer, J.; Krane, C.M.; Menon, A.G.; King, L.S.; Agre, P.C.; Nielsen, S. Functional requirement of aquaporin-5 in plasma membranes of sweat glands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xie, L.; Jin, L.; Feng, J.; Lv, J. The Expression of AQP5 and UTs in the Sweat Glands of Uremic Patients. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 8629783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Scott, J.H.; Menouar, M.A.; Dunn, R.J. Physiology, Aldosterone; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470339/ (accessed on 1 May 2023).
  27. Montain, S.J.; Laird, J.E.; Latzka, W.A.; Sawka, M.N. Aldosterone and vasopressin responses in the heat: Hydration level and exercise intensity effects. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1997, 29, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patel, P.N.; Horenstein, M.S.; Zwibel, H. Exercise Physiology; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482280/ (accessed on 6 October 2024).
  29. Baker, L.B. Sweating Rate and Sweat Sodium Concentration in Athletes: A Review of Methodology and Intra/Interindividual Variability. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Baker, L.B.; Stofan, J.R.; Hamilton, A.A.; Horswill, C.A. Comparison of regional patch collection vs. whole body washdown for measuring sweat sodium and potassium loss during exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 107, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Armstrong, L.E.; Casa, D.J. Methods to Evaluate Electrolyte and Water Turnover of Athletes. Athl. Train. Sports Health Care 2009, 1, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Patterson, M.J.; Galloway, S.D.; Nimmo, M.A. Variations in regional sweat composition in normal human males. Exp. Physiol. 2000, 85, 869–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Baker, L.B.; De Chavez, P.J.D.; Nuccio, R.P.; Brown, S.D.; King, M.A.; Sopeña, B.C.; Barnes, K.A. Explaining variation in sweat sodium concentration: Effect of individual characteristics and exercise, environmental, and dietary factors. J. Appl. Physiol. 2022, 133, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Weschler, L.B. Sweat electrolyte concentrations obtained from within occlusive coverings are falsely high because sweat itself leaches skin electrolytes. J. Appl. Physiol. 2008, 105, 1376–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cole, D.E.; Boucher, M.J. Use of a new sample-collection device (Macroduct) in anion analysis of human sweat. Clin. Chem. 1986, 32, 1375–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lemon, P.W.; Yarasheski, K.E.; Dolny, D.G.; Brown, M.B.; Haack, K.K.V.; Pollack, B.P.; Millard-Stafford, M.; McCarty, N.A.; Baker, L.B.; Stofan, J.R.; et al. Validity/reliability of sweat analysis by whole-body washdown vs. regional collections. J. Appl. Physiol. 1986, 61, 1967–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gibson, L.E.; Cooke, R.E. A test for concentration of electrolytes in sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas utilizing pilocarpine by iontophoresis. Pediatrics 1959, 23, 545–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barnes, K.A.; Anderson, M.L.; Stofan, J.R.; Dalrymple, K.J.; Reimel, A.J.; Roberts, T.J.; Randell, R.K.; Ungaro, C.T.; Baker, L.B. Normative data for sweating rate, sweat sodium concentration, and sweat sodium loss in athletes: An update and analysis by sport. J. Sports Sci. 2019, 37, 2356–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Baker, L.B.; Stofan, J.R.; Lukaski, H.C.; Horswill, C.A. Exercise-induced trace mineral element concentration in regional versus whole-body wash-down sweat. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2011, 21, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Buono, M.J.; Kolding, M.; Leslie, E.; Moreno, D.; Norwood, S.; Ordille, A.; Weller, R. Heat acclimation causes a linear decrease in sweat sodium ion concentration. J. Therm. Biol. 2018, 71, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Baker, L.B.; Barnes, K.A.; Anderson, M.L.; Passe, D.H.; Stofan, J.R. Normative data for regional sweat sodium concentration and whole-body sweating rate in athletes. J. Sports Sci. 2016, 34, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Benjamin, C.L.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Struder, J.F.; Szymanski, M.R.; Manning, C.N.; Grundstein, A.J.; Lee, E.C.; Huggins, R.A.; Armstrong, L.E.; Casa, D.J. Heat Acclimation Following Heat Acclimatization Elicits Additional Physiological Improvements in Male Endurance Athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Benjamin, C.L.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Armstrong, L.E.; Manning, C.N.; Struder, J.F.; Butler, C.R.; Huggins, R.A.; Stearns, R.L.; Lee, E.C.; Casa, D.J. The efficacy of weekly and bi-weekly heat training to maintain the physiological benefits of heat acclimation. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2022, 25, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Armstrong, L.E.; Hubbard, R.W.; DeLUCA, J.P.; Christensen, E.L. Heat acclimatization during summer running in the northeastern United States. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1987, 19, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kaufman, F.; Mills, D.; Hughson, R.; Peake, G. Effects of bromocriptine on sweat gland function during heat acclimatization. Horm. Res. 1988, 29, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Buono, M.J.; Ball, K.D.; Kolkhorst, F.W. Sodium ion concentration vs. sweat rate relationship in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007, 103, 990–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Inoue, Y.; Havenith, G.; Kenney, W.L.; Loomis, J.L.; Buskirk, E.R. Exercise- and methylcholine-induced sweating responses in older and younger men: Effect of heat acclimation and aerobic fitness. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1999, 42, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karlsen, A.; Nybo, L.; Nørgaard, S.J.; Jensen, M.V.; Bonne, T.; Racinais, S. Time course of natural heat acclimatization in well-trained cyclists during a 2-week training camp in the heat. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2015, 25 (Suppl. S1), 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kirby, C.R.; Convertino, V.A.; Tucker, M.A.; Six, A.; Moyen, N.E.; Satterfield, A.Z.; Ganio, M.S.; Keiser, S.; Flück, D.; Hüppin, F.; et al. Plasma aldosterone and sweat sodium concentrations after exercise and heat acclimation. J. Appl. Physiol. 1986, 61, 967–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Klous, L.; de Ruiter, C.; Alkemade, P.; Daanen, H.; Gerrett, N. Sweat rate and sweat composition following active or passive heat re-acclimation: A pilot study. Temperature 2020, 8, 90–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Klous, L.; De Ruiter, C.; Alkemade, P.; Daanen, H.; Gerrett, N. Sweat rate and sweat composition during heat acclimation. J. Therm. Biol. 2020, 93, 102697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Magalhães, F.C.; Passos, R.L.F.; Fonseca, M.A.; Oliveira, K.P.M.; Ferreira-Júnior, J.B.; Martini, A.R.P.; Lima, M.R.M.; Guimarães, J.B.; Baraúna, V.G.; Silami-Garcia, E.; et al. Thermoregulatory efficiency is increased after heat acclimation in tropical natives. J. Physiol. Anthr. 2010, 29, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Marshall, H.C.; Campbell, S.A.; Roberts, C.W.; Nimmo, M.A. Human physiological and heat shock protein 72 adaptations during the initial phase of humid-heat acclimation. J. Therm. Biol. 2007, 32, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. McCleave, E.L.; Slattery, K.M.; Duffield, R.; Saunders, P.U.; Sharma, A.P.; Crowcroft, S.; Coutts, A.J. Impaired Heat Adaptation From Combined Heat Training and “Live High, Train Low” Hypoxia. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2019, 14, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mikkelsen, C.J.; Junge, N.; Piil, J.F.; Morris, N.B.; Oberholzer, L.; Siebenmann, C.; Lundby, C.; Nybo, L. Prolonged Heat Acclimation and Aerobic Performance in Endurance Trained Athletes. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Petersen, C.J.; Portus, M.R.; Pyne, D.B.; Dawson, B.T.; Cramer, M.N.; Kellett, A.D. Partial heat acclimation in cricketers using a 4-day high intensity cycling protocol. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2010, 5, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rendell, R.A.; Prout, J.; Costello, J.T.; Massey, H.C.; Tipton, M.J.; Young, J.S.; Corbett, J. Effects of 10 days of separate heat and hypoxic exposure on heat acclimation and temperate exercise performance. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2017, 313, R191–R201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Saat, M.; Sirisinghe, R.G.; Singh, R.; Tochihara, Y. Effects of short-term exercise in the heat on thermoregulation, blood parameters, sweat secretion and sweat composition of tropic-dwelling subjects. J. Physiol. Anthr. Appl. Hum. Sci. 2005, 24, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Willmott, A.G.B.; Hayes, M.; James, C.A.; Gibson, O.R.; Maxwell, N.S. Heat acclimation attenuates the increased sensations of fatigue reported during acute exercise-heat stress. Temperature 2019, 7, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Roussey, G.; Bernard, T.; Fontanari, P.; Louis, J. Heat acclimation training with intermittent and self-regulated intensity may be used as an alternative to traditional steady state and power-regulated intensity in endurance cyclists. J. Therm. Biol. 2021, 98, 102935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Racinais, S.; Mohr, M.; Buchheit, M.; Voss, S.C.; Gaoua, N.; Grantham, J.; Nybo, L. Individual responses to short-term heat acclimatisation as predictors of football per-formance in a hot, dry environment. Br. J. Sports Med. 2012, 46, 810–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Racinais, S.; Buchheit, M.; Bilsborough, J.; Bourdon, P.C.; Cordy, J.; Coutts, A.J. Physiological and performance responses to a training camp in the heat in professional Australian football players. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2014, 9, 598–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tan, S.C.C.; Ang, W.H.; Lim, L.S.X.; Low, I.C.C.; Lee, J.K.W. Efficacy of Isothermic Conditioning over Military-Based Heat Acclimatization and Interval Training in Tropical Native Males. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2022, 54, 1925–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zurawlew, M.J.; Mee, J.A.; Walsh, N.P. Post-exercise Hot Water Immersion Elicits Heat Acclimation Adaptations That Are Retained for at Least Two Weeks. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Taylor, N.A.; A Machado-Moreira, C. Regional variations in transepidermal water loss, eccrine sweat gland density, sweat secretion rates and electrolyte composition in resting and exercising humans. Extrem. Physiol. Med. 2013, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bijker, K.; De Groot, G.; Hollander, A. Differences in leg muscle activity during running and cycling in humans. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 87, 556–561. [Google Scholar]
  67. Hori, S. Adaptation to heat. Jpn. J. Physiol. 1995, 45, 921–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Saat, M.; Tochihara, Y.; Hashiguchi, N.; Sirisinghe, R.G.; Fujita, M.; Chou, C.M. Effects of exercise in the heat on thermoregulation of Japanese and Malaysian males. J. Physiol. Anthr. Appl. Hum. Sci. 2005, 24, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rivera-Brown, A.M.; Quiñones-González, J.R. Normative Data for Sweat Rate and Whole-Body Sodium Concentration in Athletes Indigenous to Tropical Climate. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2020, 30, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Tebeck, S.T.; Buckley, J.D.; Bellenger, C.R.; Stanley, J. Differing Physiological Adaptations Induced by Dry and Humid Short-Term Heat Acclimation. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2020, 15, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kim, S.B.; Lee, K.; Raj, M.S.; Lee, B.; Reeder, J.T.; Koo, J.; Hourlier-Fargette, A.; Bandodkar, A.J.; Won, S.M.; Sekine, Y.; et al. Soft, Skin-Interfaced Microfluidic Systems with Wireless, Battery-Free Electronics for Digital, Real-Time Tracking of Sweat Loss and Electrolyte Composition. Small 2018, 14, e1802876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Koh, A.; Kang, D.; Xue, Y.; Lee, S.; Pielak, R.M.; Kim, J.; Hwang, T.; Min, S.; Banks, A.; Bastien, P.; et al. A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 366ra165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rodin, D.; Shapiro, Y.; Pinhasov, A.; Kreinin, A.; Kirby, M. An accurate wearable hydration sensor: Real-world evaluation of practical use. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0272646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Choi, J.; Ghaffari, R.; Baker, L.B.; Rogers, J.A. Skin-interfaced systems for sweat collection and analytics. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Basheer, A. The Art and Science of Writing Narrative Reviews. Int. J. Adv. Med. Health Res. 2022, 9, 124–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Impact of sweat electrolyte loss in sports performance across physiological and physical performance metrics.
Figure 1. Impact of sweat electrolyte loss in sports performance across physiological and physical performance metrics.
Applsci 14 10103 g001
Figure 2. Whole-body washdown (WBW) vs. regional sweat patches, advantages for sweat electrolyte analysis. Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 24 September 2024.
Figure 2. Whole-body washdown (WBW) vs. regional sweat patches, advantages for sweat electrolyte analysis. Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 24 September 2024.
Applsci 14 10103 g002
Table 1. Summary of heat acclimation/acclimatization and electrolyte concentration (conc.) investigations. Arrows signify a reduction or no change in sweat electrolyte concentration following HA.
Table 1. Summary of heat acclimation/acclimatization and electrolyte concentration (conc.) investigations. Arrows signify a reduction or no change in sweat electrolyte concentration following HA.
StudyParticipant CharacteristicsHA ClassificationSweat Electrolyte AssessmentNa+ Sweat Conc.Cl Sweat Conc.K+ Sweat Conc.
Buono et al. (2018) [40]4 healthy individuals (f = 1)7-day HAForearm regional sweat collectorApplsci 14 10103 i001----
Benjamin et al. (2021) [42]24 male endurance athletes4-month HAz + 5-days HAWBWApplsci 14 10103 i002Applsci 14 10103 i003Applsci 14 10103 i004
Benjamin et al. (2022) [43]24 male endurance athletes4- and 8-wk IHT after 5-day HA WBWApplsci 14 10103 i005Applsci 14 10103 i006Applsci 14 10103 i007
Armstrong (1987) [44]5 highly trained distance runners (f = 1)14.5-wk HAzWBWApplsci 14 10103 i008--Applsci 14 10103 i009
Kaufman et al. (1988) [45]8 healthy males10-day HAWBWApplsci 14 10103 i010--Applsci 14 10103 i011
Buono et al. (2007) [46]8 healthy males10-day HAChest regional sweat collectorApplsci 14 10103 i012----
Inoue et al. (1999) [47]5 young, 4 highly fit old, and 5 normally fit old males8-day HAChest, back, forearm, &and thigh sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i013----
Karlsen et al. (2015) [48]9 trained cyclists2-wk HAzBack sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i014----
Kirby and Convertino (1986) [49]10 healthy males10-day HAChest regional sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i015----
Klous et al. (2020b) [50]15 healthy participants (f = 5)10-day HABack and arm sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i016Applsci 14 10103 i017Applsci 14 10103 i018
Klous et al. (2020a) [51]8 healthy participants (f = 2)10-day HABack and arm sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i019Applsci 14 10103 i020Applsci 14 10103 i021
Magalhães et al. (2010) [52]9 male tropical natives11-day HAForehead, chest, arm, forearm, and thigh sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i022----
Marshall et al. (2007) [53]7 healthy males3-day HAForearm sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i023Applsci 14 10103 i024--
McCleave et al. (2019) [54]9 trained male and female runners (f = 3)3-wk heat trainingBack sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i025----
Mikkelsen et al. (2019) [55]12 male sub-elite cyclists5.5-wk HABack sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i026----
Petersen et al. (2010) [56]6 male cricket players4-day HAUpper forearm sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i027Applsci 14 10103 i028Applsci 14 10103 i029
Rendell et al. (2017) [57]8 healthy males11-day HABack sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i030----
Saat et al. (2005) [58]16 Malaysian-Malay males2-wk HABack sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i031--Applsci 14 10103 i032
Willmott et al. (2019) [59]20 healthy males5- and 10-day HAUnspecified regional sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i033----
Roussey et al. (2021) [60]17 male competitive-level athletes5-day HABack sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i034----
Racinais et al. (2012) [61]19 male semiprofessional soccer players6-day HAzBack sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i035----
Racinais et al. (2014) [62]18 male Australian football players2-wk HAzBack sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i036----
Tan et al. (2022) [63]51 untrained tropical native males10-day HAThigh sweat patchApplsci 14 10103 i037----
f, female; HA, heat acclimation; HAz, heat acclimatization; WBW, whole-body washdown; IHT, intermittent heat training.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Keefe, M.S.; Benjamin, C.L.; Casa, D.J.; Sekiguchi, Y. Importance of Electrolytes in Exercise Performance and Assessment Methodology After Heat Training: A Narrative Review. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10103. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210103

AMA Style

Keefe MS, Benjamin CL, Casa DJ, Sekiguchi Y. Importance of Electrolytes in Exercise Performance and Assessment Methodology After Heat Training: A Narrative Review. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(22):10103. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Keefe, Marcos S., Courteney L. Benjamin, Douglas J. Casa, and Yasuki Sekiguchi. 2024. "Importance of Electrolytes in Exercise Performance and Assessment Methodology After Heat Training: A Narrative Review" Applied Sciences 14, no. 22: 10103. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210103

APA Style

Keefe, M. S., Benjamin, C. L., Casa, D. J., & Sekiguchi, Y. (2024). Importance of Electrolytes in Exercise Performance and Assessment Methodology After Heat Training: A Narrative Review. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10103. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop