Next Article in Journal
Special Issue on Advanced Technologies in Seismic Design, Assessment and Retrofitting
Previous Article in Journal
Vibroarthrography as a Noninvasive Screening Method for Early Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Review of Current Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Accusations and Law Articles Prediction in the Field of Environmental Protection

School of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(1), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010280
Submission received: 5 November 2024 / Revised: 13 December 2024 / Accepted: 18 December 2024 / Published: 31 December 2024

Abstract

Legal judgment prediction is a common basic task in the field of Legal AI, aimed at using deep domain models to predict the outcomes of judicial cases, such as charges, legal provisions, and other related tasks. This task has practical applications in environmental law, including legal decision assistance and legal advice, offering a promising and broad prospect. However, most previous studies focus on using high-quality labeled data for strong supervised training in criminal justice, often neglecting the rich external knowledge contained in various charges and laws. This approach fails to accurately simulate the decision-making steps of judges in real scenarios, overlooking the semantic information in case descriptions that significantly impacts judgment results, leading to biased outcomes. In judicial environmental protection, the high overlap and similarity between different charges can cause confusion, and there is a lack of relevant judicial decision labeling datasets. To address this, we propose the External Knowledge-Infused Cross Attention Network (EKICAN), which leverages the robust semantic understanding capabilities of large models. By extracting information such as fact descriptions and court opinions from documents of criminal, civil, and administrative cases related to judicial environmental protection, we construct the Judicial Environmental Law Judgment Dataset (JELJD). We address data imbalance in this dataset using the text generation capabilities of judicial large models. Finally, EKICAN fuses semantic information from different parts with external knowledge to output prediction results. Experimental results show that EKICAN achieves state-of-the-art performance on the JELJD compared to advanced models.
Keywords: legal judgment prediction; judicial environmental protection; external knowledge fusion; data imbalance legal judgment prediction; judicial environmental protection; external knowledge fusion; data imbalance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leng, S.; Kang, X.; Liang, Q.; Li, X.; Fan, Y. Accusations and Law Articles Prediction in the Field of Environmental Protection. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010280

AMA Style

Leng S, Kang X, Liang Q, Li X, Fan Y. Accusations and Law Articles Prediction in the Field of Environmental Protection. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(1):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leng, Sihan, Xiaojun Kang, Qingzhong Liang, Xinchuan Li, and Yuanyuan Fan. 2025. "Accusations and Law Articles Prediction in the Field of Environmental Protection" Applied Sciences 15, no. 1: 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010280

APA Style

Leng, S., Kang, X., Liang, Q., Li, X., & Fan, Y. (2025). Accusations and Law Articles Prediction in the Field of Environmental Protection. Applied Sciences, 15(1), 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop