Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Cushioning Properties on Parameters of Gait in Habituated Females While Walking and Running
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Influencing Factors of Promotion of Prefabricated Housing in Hainan Province Based on BPNN–DEMATEL
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploration of the Characteristics of Elderly-Driver-Involved Single-Vehicle Hit-Fixed-Object Crashes in Pennsylvania, USA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk Perception and Barriers to Electric Scooter Prevalence

1
Department of Civil Engineering, Braude College of Engineering, 51 Snunit St., Karmiel 2161002, Israel
2
Sami Shamoon College of Engineering, 84 Jabotinsky St., Ashdod 77245, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 1117; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031117
Submission received: 10 December 2024 / Revised: 19 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 23 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vehicle Safety and Crash Avoidance)

Featured Application

This study offers insights for urban planners and policymakers to improve electric scooter safety and adoption by addressing infrastructure gaps and user concerns. Findings support the design of safer micro-mobility environments and targeted policies to promote sustainable transportation.

Abstract

Micro-mobility, which includes small, lightweight vehicles such as bicycles, electric scooters, and electric bikes, has emerged as a key component of modern urban transportation over the last decade. ESs have transformed how people navigate cities by offering an eco-friendly alternative to traditional transport, improving last-mile connectivity, and reducing traffic congestion. However, they also present challenges related to safety, infrastructure, and regulation. The rising crash rates involving electric scooters pose a significant public safety concern, driven by their novelty and limited research on associated risks. This study investigates factors influencing the adoption and use of electric scooter-sharing services, emphasizing risk perception, cultural norms, technological familiarity, and physical infrastructure. It also examines travel behaviors, common risks, and barriers to adoption. Using data from 254 Israeli participants, including 50 electric scooter users, the research highlights that 48% of users experienced near-miss incidents, and 38% used scooters on vehicular roads. The primary risk was identified as dangerous driver behavior on these roads, while the key barrier to adoption was a high perception of risk or low sense of safety. A structural equation model revealed that risk perception is influenced by gender-related attitudes and subjective norms, which indirectly diminish positive attitudes toward electric scooters and willingness to share and use them. The findings emphasize the importance of a safe physical infrastructure in fostering positive attitudes and promoting electric scooter use. This research provides valuable insights into mitigating risks and improving the adoption of electric scooters as a sustainable micro-mobility option.
Keywords: electric scooters; safety; risk perception; structural equation modeling electric scooters; safety; risk perception; structural equation modeling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shahin, F.; Elias, W. Risk Perception and Barriers to Electric Scooter Prevalence. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031117

AMA Style

Shahin F, Elias W. Risk Perception and Barriers to Electric Scooter Prevalence. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(3):1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shahin, Fadi, and Wafa Elias. 2025. "Risk Perception and Barriers to Electric Scooter Prevalence" Applied Sciences 15, no. 3: 1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031117

APA Style

Shahin, F., & Elias, W. (2025). Risk Perception and Barriers to Electric Scooter Prevalence. Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031117

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop