Systematic Review of Hierarchical and Multi-Agent Optimization Strategies for P2P Energy Management and Electric Machines in Microgrids
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology for Selection of Studies
2.1. Methodology: PRISMA Framework
- Identification: An exhaustive search is conducted across multiple databases to compile a comprehensive pool of studies potentially relevant to the research objectives. This step involves designing detailed search strategies tailored to the scope of the review and employing bibliographic tools to manage and organize retrieved records.
- Screening: Duplicate records are identified and removed, and studies are evaluated based on predefined inclusion criteria through title and abstract reviews. This phase narrows the dataset to studies most likely to meet the review’s objectives while maintaining transparency and consistency in the selection process.
- Eligibility and Inclusion: A detailed full-text evaluation of the remaining studies is performed. Each study is assessed using specific criteria for relevance, methodological rigor, innovation, data quality, and impact. Studies meeting the defined threshold for quality and alignment are included in the synthesis. This phase ensures that only high-quality, pertinent studies are retained for the review.
- Synthesis: The selected studies undergo comprehensive analysis to integrate their findings, methodologies, and contributions. This phase involves summarizing, comparing, and synthesizing evidence to address the research questions and provide a cohesive understanding of the topic.
2.2. Identification of the Studies
- Scopus: Offers advanced search functionalities, comprehensive indexing, and analytical tools for tracking trends and citations. Its content spans multiple disciplines and includes high-impact publishers like Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, and MDPI. The search string used for Scopus was as follows: TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Energy management”) AND (“Hierarchical” OR “Multi-agent” OR “Robust”) AND (“peer to peer”)) AND PUBYEAR > 2013 AND PUBYEAR < 2025 AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “ar”) OR LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “cp”)) AND (LIMIT-TO (LANGUAGE, “English”)).
- Web of Science: Known for its rigorous curation, WoS provides a multidisciplinary collection of high-quality publications, with robust citation tracking and analysis capabilities. For Web of Science, the following query was applied: ALL = (Energy management) AND (ALL = (Hierarchical) OR ALL = (Multi-agent) OR ALL = (Robust)) AND (ALL = (peer to peer)).
2.3. Screening of the Identified Studies
- Publication Year: Studies published between 2014 and 2024 were included, capturing advancements over the past decade while maintaining a focus on recent developments. This time frame provided a balanced view of contemporary research trends and innovations in the field.
- Document Type: Only original research articles published in peer-reviewed journals or presented at conferences were considered. Works such as review articles, editorials, letters, opinion pieces, policy briefs, and other non-empirical contributions were excluded. This criterion ensured the inclusion of studies offering novel insights, experimental findings, or robust analytical frameworks directly relevant to the research objectives.
- Language: Articles written in English were selected, reflecting the predominant language of international scientific discourse. This approach enhanced the comparability of studies and ensured a broad representation of globally recognized research.
- Full-Text Availability: Only studies with accessible full texts, either through institutional subscriptions or open-access platforms, were included. This criterion allowed for an in-depth analysis of methodologies, findings, and conclusions, which was critical for maintaining the rigor of the systematic review.
- Thematic Relevance: Each study was evaluated for alignment with the review’s scope and objectives. Only research explicitly addressing energy management within hierarchical, multi-agent, or robust systems—particularly in the context of P2P energy trading—was retained. This ensured that the review focused on the literature directly contributing to the understanding and resolution of the research problem.
2.4. Eligibility and Inclusion of Screened Manuscripts
- Eligibility Criterion 1—Alignment with Research Objectives: This criterion evaluates how well this study aligns with the research scope, particularly its focus on hierarchical, multi-agent, or robust optimization approaches in energy management within P2P frameworks. Studies addressing the role of electric machines in DES or their integration with RES are prioritized (Scoring: 1—Peripheral, 2—Related, 3—Highly Relevant).
- Eligibility Criterion 2—Methodological Rigor: This criterion assesses the robustness and appropriateness of this study’s methodology, including experimental setups, simulation models, validation frameworks, and the overall clarity of the research process. The methods must provide sufficient evidence to support the study’s findings (Scoring: 1—Needs Improvement, 2—Acceptable, 3—Strong).
- Eligibility Criterion 3—Originality and Innovation: This criterion evaluates the novelty of the proposed strategies or frameworks in this study. This includes innovative approaches to multi-agent optimization, robust control mechanisms, or the role of electric machines (e.g., SiC- or GaN-based technologies) in enhancing energy efficiency and reliability in P2P systems (Scoring: 1—Minor, 2—Moderate, 3—Major).
- Eligibility Criterion 4—Data Quality and Analysis: This criterion measures the reliability, reproducibility, and depth of the data analysis presented in this study. High-scoring studies provide detailed, well-documented datasets and analyses, including energy flow modeling, the machine performance, or system-level optimization outcomes in P2P environments (Scoring: 1—Satisfactory, 2—Good, 3—Excellent).
- Eligibility Criterion 5—Impact and Contribution to the Field: This criterion evaluates this study’s potential contribution to advancing knowledge in the domain of distributed energy management. High-impact studies are those that propose transformative insights, address significant challenges, or establish new benchmarks in energy management and electric machine applications measured by the number of citations (Scoring: 1—Low impact, 2—Moderate impact, 3—High impact).
2.5. Synthesis of the Selected Studies
- Optimization and Modeling in Energy Systems: This theme encompasses studies focused on enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of energy systems through mathematical models, advanced algorithms, and optimization techniques. Research within this category addresses co-optimization strategies for distributed energy resources, energy planning methodologies, and robust analyses to manage uncertainties in distributed generation, microgrids, and P2P energy trading.
- Multi-Agent Systems and Distributed Control: Studies in this category explore the use of MAS and distributed control approaches for energy management. Key aspects include scalability and flexibility for coordinating energy trading in complex networks, such as prosumer communities and microgrids, and decentralized cooperation to enhance resilience in energy systems.
- Simulations, Case Studies, and Real-World Applications: This theme brings together studies that validate energy management strategies and trading models through simulations to explore theoretical frameworks, case studies, and practical implementations addressing real-world challenges, experimental evidence, and insights into applying P2P systems and microgrid technologies.
- Blockchain, Smart Contracts, and Emerging Technologies: Research in this category examines how emerging technologies enhance the functionality of energy systems. Key technologies include blockchain and smart contracts for secure, transparent, and automated transactions, AI and advanced communication tools for system optimization, applications in P2P energy markets, and prosumer networks.
- Frameworks for Robust and Decentralized Energy Management: This category highlights the development of conceptual and methodological frameworks to improve the stability and flexibility of DES under uncertainty. Studies emphasize the decentralized coordination of energy resources and robust strategies to adapt to dynamic changes in the system operation, enhancing resilience against disruptions.
- Electric Machines and Their Role in Distributed Energy Systems: Unlike the previous themes derived directly from the word cloud analysis, this category emerges from the specific focus of this systematic review. Based on the eight studies addressing this topic, the role of electric machines in DES is emphasized. Key contributions include their integration in energy generation, storage, and conversion; applications in microgrids, nanogrids, and decentralized energy markets; and the exploration of renewable energy integration, system stability, and operational flexibility enabled by electric machines, including wind generators, synchronous machines, and reluctance generators.
3. Results
3.1. Optimization and Modeling in Energy Systems
3.1.1. Main Trends
3.1.2. Originality
3.1.3. Comparative Analysis
3.2. Multi-Agent Systems and Distributed Control
3.2.1. Main Trends
3.2.2. Originality
3.2.3. Research Gaps
3.3. Simulations, Case Studies, and Real-World Applications
3.3.1. Main Trends
3.3.2. Originality
3.3.3. Critical Analysis
3.4. Blockchain, Smart Contracts, and Emerging Technologies
3.4.1. Main Trends
3.4.2. Originality
3.4.3. Key Contributions
3.5. Frameworks for Robust and Decentralized Energy Management
3.5.1. Main Trends
3.5.2. Originality
3.5.3. Future Perspectives
3.6. Electric Machines and Their Role in Distributed Energy Systems
3.6.1. Current Developments
3.6.2. Innovative Approaches
3.6.3. Technology Comparison
3.7. Critical Synthesis and Future Directions
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix A.1. Flowchart for Systematic Literature Review
Appendix A.2. Summary of Findings from Reviewed Studies
N° | ID | Ref. | Title | Author | Year | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | S-035 | [1] | Day-ahead scheduling of 100% isolated communities under uncertainties through a novel stochastic–robust model | Tostado-Véliz, M. et al. | 2022 | Developing of a three-stage day-ahead scheduling strategy for isolated 100% energy communities, involving P2P transactions among prosumers. |
2 | S-073 | [6] | Scalable coordinated management of peer-to-peer energy trading: A multi-cluster deep reinforcement learning approach | Qiu, D. et al. | 2021 | Design of a hierarchical peer-to-peer energy trading mechanism with coordinated management and distributed optimization. |
3 | WoS-071 | [29] | Optimal participation of prosumers in energy communities through a novel stochastic–robust day-ahead scheduling model | Tostado-Véliz, M. et al. | 2023 | Optimization of prosumer participation in local energy communities under uncertainty using robust multi-objective strategies. |
4 | S-012 | [65] | Design and management of a distributed hybrid energy system through smart contract and blockchain | Li, Y. et al. | 2019 | Implementation of a distributed hybrid energy system with intelligent agents to enhance resiliency and operational flexibility. |
5 | S-019 | [50] | An electric power trading framework for smart residential community in smart cities | Hanumantha, R. | 2019 | Development of a blockchain-enabled framework for electricity trading in smart grids using auction-based mechanisms. |
6 | S-034 | [42] | Federated reinforcement learning for smart building joint peer-to-peer energy and carbon allowance trading | Qiu, D. et al. | 2023 | Application of federated reinforcement learning to optimize energy consumption and trading decisions in smart buildings. |
7 | S-041 | [66] | Towards sustainable smart cities: A secure and scalable trading system for residential homes using blockchain and artificial intelligence | Samuel, O. et al. | 2022 | Proposal of a secure and decentralized P2P energy trading platform leveraging blockchain for smart city applications. |
8 | S-055 | [62] | A Scalable Privacy-Preserving Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Transactive Energy Trading | Ye, Y. et al. | 2021 | Proposal of a novel P2P transactive trading scheme based on the MAAC algorithm, which addresses some typical technical challenges. |
9 | S-063 | [84] | Distributed peer-to-peer energy trading for residential fuel cell combined heat and power systems | Nguyen, D. | 2021 | Design of a real-time, distributed P2P energy trading platform tailored for remote microgrids with renewable integration. |
10 | WoS-043 | [53] | An optimal scheduling strategy for peer-to-peer trading in interconnected microgrids based on RO and Nash bargaining | Wei, C. et al. | 2021 | Formulation of an optimal scheduling model for peer-to-peer electricity trading using mixed-integer programming and game theory. |
11 | WoS-058 | [77] | A Novel Locality Algorithm and Peer-to-Peer Communication Infrastructure for Optimizing Network Performance in Smart Microgrids | Marzal, S. et al. | 2017 | Development of a locality-based P2P communication model for enhanced performance in smart grid energy transactions. |
12 | WoS-096 | [5] | Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Coordinated Energy Trading and Flexibility Services Provision in Local Electricity Markets | Ye, Y. et al. | 2023 | Use of multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for optimal P2P energy trading coordination in local electricity markets. |
13 | WoS-112 | [17] | Hierarchical Scheduling of Aggregated TCL Flexibility for Transactive Energy in Power Systems | Song, M. et al. | 2020 | Design of a hierarchical scheduling method for aggregating TCL flexibility to enable efficient P2P market participation. |
14 | WoS-140 | [67] | Blockchain-Based Decentralized Virtual Power Plants of Small Prosumers | Cioara, T. et al. | 2021 | Proposal of a decentralized virtual power plant system using blockchain and smart contracts for secure energy trading. |
15 | WoS-168 | [64] | A Novel Discounted Min-Consensus Algorithm for Optimal Electrical Power Trading in Grid-Connected DC Microgrids | Xu, Y. | 2019 | Introduction of a novel min-consensus algorithm for optimal matching of supply and demand in P2P electricity trading. |
16 | WoS-105 | [56] | Secondary Control for Storage Power Converters in Isolated Nanogrids to Allow Peer-to-Peer Power Sharing | González-Romera, E. et al. | 2020 | Design of a secondary control strategy for storage converters in DC microgrids participating in P2P energy markets. |
17 | S-001 | [68] | Blockchain-based smart contract for energy demand management | Wang, X. et al. | 2019 | Implementation of a blockchain-based smart contract model for efficient demand-side energy management in P2P networks. |
18 | S-007 | [52] | Hierarchical Energy Management in Islanded Networked Microgrids | Hong, Y. | 2022 | Development of a hierarchical energy management strategy for islanded networks involving distributed energy trading. |
19 | S-008 | [54] | Customized decentralized autonomous organization based optimal energy management for smart buildings | Ding, Y. et al. | 2024 | Introduction of a customized decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) structure for managing P2P energy markets. |
20 | S-013 | [55] | Coordination of commercial prosumers with distributed demand-side flexibility in energy sharing and management system | Zheng, S. et al. | 2022 | Proposal of a distributed coordination strategy for commercial prosumers using Nash equilibrium in energy trading. |
21 | S-015 | [26] | Aggregator-Network Coordinated Peer-to-Peer Multi-Energy Trading via Adaptive Robust Stochastic Optimization | Zou, Y. | 2024 | Proposal of a coordinated P2P trading mechanism using aggregator–network interaction to enhance market efficiency. |
22 | S-017 | [81] | A hierarchical and decentralized energy management system for peer-to-peer energy trading | Elkazaz, M. | 2021 | Development of a hierarchical and decentralized energy management system enabling P2P trading in AC/DC hybrid microgrids. |
23 | S-033 | [61] | Distribution loss allocation in peer-to-peer energy trading in a network of microgrids | Bai, L. | 2020 | Design of a distribution loss allocation method tailored for P2P energy markets to ensure fair cost distribution. |
24 | S-045 | [2] | Multi-Agent Based Optimal Scheduling and Trading for Multi-Microgrids Integrated with Urban Transportation Networks | Liu, Y. et al. | 2021 | Formulation of a multi-agent-based scheduling and trading model for optimal energy management in community microgrids. |
25 | S-046 | [51] | Mean-Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Peer-to-Peer Multi-Energy Trading | Qiu, D. et al. | 2023 | Implementation of a mean-field multi-agent reinforcement learning model for scalable optimization in P2P electricity trading. |
26 | S-048 | [25] | A distributed robust ADMM-based model for the energy management in local energy communities | Khojasteh, M. | 2023 | Design of a robust distributed optimization model using ADMM for dynamic P2P market clearing under uncertainty. |
27 | S-051 | [96] | Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Automated Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in Double-Side Auction Market | Qiu, D. et al. | 2021 | Application of multi-agent reinforcement learning to automate P2P electricity trading and improve decision-making efficiency. |
28 | S-052 | [85] | Coordinated management of aggregated electric vehicles and thermostatically controlled loads in hierarchical energy systems | Liu, G. et al. | 2021 | Proposal of a coordinated charging/discharging scheme for aggregated EV fleets participating in P2P energy trading. |
29 | S-058 | [72] | Towards the detailed modeling of deregulated electricity markets comprising Smart prosumers and peer to peer energy trading | Symiakakis, M. | 2023 | Development of a modeling framework for analyzing deregulated electricity markets including P2P trading dynamics. |
30 | S-059 | [97] | Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Co-Optimization of P2P Energy Trading and Network Operation for Interconnected Microgrids | Li, J. et al. | 2021 | Introduction of a data-driven co-optimization model using distributionally robust techniques for integrated P2P trading and reserve allocation. |
31 | S-064 | [47] | Multi-agent energy management of smart islands using primal-dual method of multipliers | Mohamed, M. | 2020 | Development of a multi-agent based energy management framework for smart islands promoting sustainability and resiliency. |
32 | S-071 | [98] | Scalable multi-agent reinforcement learning for distributed control of residential energy flexibility | Charbonnier, F. | 2022 | Proposal of a scalable multi-agent reinforcement learning strategy to manage distributed energy resources in smart grids. |
33 | S-077 | [14] | Distributed multi-agent based coordinated power management and control strategy for microgrids with distributed energy resources | Rahman, M. | 2017 | Design of a distributed coordinated power flow control system using multi-agent systems in P2P microgrids. |
34 | WoS-003 | [45] | Multi-Agent Microgrid Management System for Single-Board Computers: A Case Study on Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading | Comes, L. | 2020 | Implementation of a multi-agent microgrid system for intelligent management of single and interconnected communities. |
35 | WoS-028 | [99] | A Two-Tier Distributed Market Clearing Scheme for Peer-to-Peer Energy Sharing in Smart Grid | Ullah, M. | 2022 | Design of a two-tier distributed market clearing scheme supporting P2P energy trading in interconnected microgrids. |
36 | WoS-037 | [16] | Impact assessment of shared storage and peer-to-peer trading on industrial buildings in the presence of electric vehicle parking lots: A hybrid robust-CVaR analysis | Qiu, W. | 2024 | Assessment of the impact of shared energy storage systems on efficiency and fairness in P2P energy trading. |
37 | WoS-048 | [91] | Deep reinforcement learning for energy trading and load scheduling in residential peer-to-peer energy trading market | Wang, J. | 2023 | Application of deep reinforcement learning for efficient energy trading among multiple agents in smart grid environments. |
38 | WoS-049 | [49] | Real-Time Multi-Agent Based Power Management of Virtually Integrated Microgrids Comprising Prosumers of Plug-in Electric Vehicles and Renewable Energy Sources | Sifakis, N. | 2024 | Real-time power management of community microgrids using multi-agent systems for adaptive and autonomous operation. |
39 | WoS-061 | [19] | Hierarchical Blockchain Design for Distributed Control and Energy Trading Within Microgrids | Yang, J. et al. | 2022 | Design of a hierarchical blockchain framework for secure and scalable P2P energy trading in distributed systems. |
40 | WoS-066 | [71] | Energy trading and scheduling in networked microgrids using fuzzy bargaining game theory and distributionally robust optimization | Mohseni, S. | 2023 | Proposal of a hierarchical trading and scheduling model for networked microgrids using dual decomposition techniques. |
41 | WoS-080 | [32] | A Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Community Energy Trading Scheme for a Neighborhood of Smart Households | Yan, L. et al. | 2022 | Development of a hierarchical deep reinforcement learning model for cooperative energy trading and scheduling in smart grids. |
42 | WoS-082 | [57] | TrustyFeer: A Subjective Logic Trust Model for Smart City Peer-to-Peer Federated Clouds | Kurdi, H. et al. | 2018 | Introduction of a trust model (TrustyFeer) based on subjective logic to enhance security in P2P energy trading systems. |
43 | WoS-086 | [59] | Power Loss Minimization of Parallel-Connected Distributed Energy Resources in DC Microgrids Using a Distributed Gradient Algorithm-Based Hierarchical Control | Jiang, Y. et al. | 2022 | Optimization of power loss minimization using a control strategy for parallel inverters in P2P microgrid environments. |
44 | WoS-091 | [58] | Research on Blockchain-Enabled Smart Grid for Anti-Theft Electricity Securing Peer-to-Peer Transactions in Modern Grids | Din, J. et al. | 2024 | Analysis of blockchain-based transactive energy trading systems and their applicability to smart grid infrastructures. |
45 | WoS-098 | [82] | A Fully Decentralized Hierarchical Transactive Energy Framework for Charging EVs With Local DERs in Power Distribution Systems | Yang, J. et al. | 2022 | Development of a fully decentralized transactive energy system using hierarchical agent-based coordination. |
46 | WoS-107 | [33] | Smart Grid Ecosystem Modeling Using a Novel Framework for Heterogenous Agent Communities | Pereira, H. et al. | 2022 | Proposal of a novel ecosystem modeling framework for simulating smart grid operation with P2P and distributed control. |
47 | WoS-111 | [30] | Bilateral energy-trading model with hierarchical personalized pricing in a prosumer community | Huang, T. et al. | 2022 | Design of a bilateral energy trading model with hierarchical structures to enable efficient peer negotiation and control. |
48 | WoS-113 | [15] | A Decentralized Approach for Frequency Control and Economic Dispatch in Smart Grids | Lü, P. et al. | 2017 | Presentation of a decentralized control approach for frequency stability in distributed and P2P energy networks. |
49 | WoS-117 | [93] | A novel hierarchical fault management framework for wireless sensor networks: HFMF | Moridi, E. et al. | 2022 | Development of a hierarchical framework for fault management in decentralized smart grids using multi-agent systems. |
50 | WoS-124 | [87] | A stochastic hierarchical optimization and revenue allocation approach for multi-regional integrated energy systems based on cooperative games | Han, F. et al. | 2023 | Design of a stochastic optimization and revenue mechanism for hierarchical P2P electricity markets in smart grids. |
51 | WoS-131 | [92] | A hierarchical blockchain-based electricity market framework for energy transactions in a security-constrained cluster of microgrids | Esfahani, M. | 2022 | Development of a hierarchical blockchain-based electricity market model for enhancing trust and decentralization in P2P trading. |
52 | WoS-143 | [34] | Distributed mixed-integer fuzzy hierarchical programming for municipal solid waste management. Part I: System identification and methodology development | Cheng, G. et al. | 2017 | Design of a fuzzy hierarchical optimization model for distributed and uncertain peer-to-peer energy management. |
53 | WoS-144 | [70] | An Energy Sharing Mechanism Achieving the Same Flexibility as Centralized Dispatch | Chen, Y. et al. | 2021 | Proposal of an energy sharing mechanism ensuring equal economic benefits across prosumers in P2P microgrids. |
54 | WoS-152 | [23] | A trust model for recommender agent systems | Majd, E. | 2017 | Development of a trust-based recommender agent system to improve decision making in decentralized energy environments. |
55 | WoS-153 | [60] | Distributed Dynamic Resource Management and Pricing in the IoT Systems With Blockchain-as-a-Service and UAV-Enabled Mobile Edge Computing | Asheralieva, A. | 2020 | Design of a distributed dynamic resource management system to ensure secure and privacy-preserving P2P energy trading. |
56 | WoS-160 | [35] | Multi-microgrid low-carbon economy operation strategy considering both source and load uncertainty: A Nash bargaining approach | Xu, J. | 2023 | Optimization of multi-microgrid operations under low-carbon constraints using cooperative peer-based mechanisms. |
57 | WoS-184 | [100] | Tracking down coupled innovations supporting agroecological vegetable crop protection to foster sustainability transition of agrifood systems | Boulestreau, Y. et al. | 2022 | Analysis of coupled innovations supporting P2P energy initiatives and citizen engagement in energy transitions. |
58 | WoS-197 | [69] | Neural-Blockchain-Based Ultrareliable Caching for Edge-Enabled UAV Networks | Sharma, V. et al. | 2019 | Integration of neural networks and blockchain for ultrareliable energy trading and caching in edge networks. |
59 | WoS-209 | [101] | Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3): protocol of a multi-centre cross-sectional study of food intake and its determinants in older adults living in long term care homes | Keller, H. et al. | 2017 | Protocol design for optimizing mealtime routines in communal settings with potential smart grid synergies. |
60 | WoS-210 | [48] | Enabling machine learning-ready HPC ensembles with Merlin | Peterson, J. et al. | 2022 | Implementation of HPC-ready ensembles with machine learning capabilities for advanced simulation of P2P energy systems. |
61 | S-002 | [63] | Decentralized energy trading in microgrids: a blockchain-integrated model for efficient power flow with social welfare optimization | Umar, A. | 2024 | Comprehensive review of decentralized energy trading mechanisms in microgrids and their practical challenges. |
62 | S-011 | [36] | Distributed robust operation strategy of multi-microgrid based on peer-to-peer multi-energy trading | Gao, J. et al. | 2023 | Proposal of a robust distributed operation strategy for P2P energy cooperation in multi-microgrid frameworks. |
63 | S-018 | [4] | Peer-to-peer energy arbitrage in prosumer-based smart residential distribution system | Ullah, M. | 2019 | Design of an energy arbitrage model using P2P trading among prosumers to reduce electricity costs. |
64 | S-022 | [80] | Peer-to-Peer Energy Cooperation in Building Community over A Lossy Network | Lyu, C. | 2021 | Development of a cooperation model for P2P energy exchange in building communities using game-theoretic approaches. |
65 | S-024 | [86] | A peer-to-peer energy trading model for community microgrids with energy management | Ravivarma, K. | 2024 | Community-oriented P2P trading model supporting energy sharing, optimized pricing, and user participation. |
66 | S-025 | [37] | Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Among Networked Microgrids Considering the Complementary Nature of Wind and PV Solar Energy | Michon, D. | 2023 | Implementation of a communication-driven multi-microgrid P2P energy trading strategy with real-time adaptability. |
67 | S-027 | [38] | Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Among Prosumers in Energy Communities Based on Preferences Considering Holacracy Structure | Afzali, P. et al. | 2024 | P2P energy exchange optimization among prosumers in virtual power plants using distributed decision models. |
68 | S-032 | [46] | A Fully Distributed Privacy-Preserving Energy Management System for Networked Microgrid Cluster Based on Homomorphic Encryption | Yuan, Z. et al. | 2024 | Privacy-preserving distributed architecture for secure P2P energy trading among agents in microgrids. |
69 | S-037 | [102] | Robust Energy Management of Multi-microgrids System Considering Incentive-Based Demand Response Using Price Elasticity | Datta, J. | 2022 | Robust management system for interconnected microgrids ensuring energy balance and stability in P2P settings. |
70 | S-038 | [27] | Designing Fairness in Autonomous Peer-to-peer Energy Trading | Behrunani, V. et al. | 2023 | Proposal of a fairness-oriented framework for autonomous P2P trading balancing efficiency and equity. |
71 | S-062 | [83] | Peer-To-peer Energy Transaction Incorporating Prosumers’ Tendency with load and PV uncertainty consideration | Moradi, M. et al. | 2024 | Proposal of a novel P2P energy trading system integrating distributed energy storage and bi-directional energy flows. |
72 | S-066 | [18] | V2GNet: Robust Blockchain-Based Energy Trading Method and Implementation in Vehicle-To-Grid Network | Liang, Y. | 2022 | Development of a robust blockchain-based energy trading platform (V2GNet) ensuring integrity and scalability in P2P transactions. |
73 | S-068 | [95] | Multi-agent system architecture for enhanced resiliency in autonomous microgrids | Lakshminarayanan, V. | 2018 | Design of a hierarchical multi-agent system architecture to improve resilience and flexibility in P2P energy trading. |
74 | S-070 | [24] | Optimal Scheduling of Hierarchical Energy Systems with Controllable Load Demand Response | Xiaoguang, Z. et al. | 2022 | Optimal scheduling strategy for hierarchical energy systems enabling P2P trading and improved demand–supply matching. |
75 | S-074 | [89] | A Robust Decentralized Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in Community of Flexible Microgrids | Saatloo, A. | 2023 | Robust decentralized framework for P2P energy transactions ensuring operational resilience against faults and uncertainties. |
76 | S-076 | [75] | Design of a Multiagent-Based Voltage Control System in Peer-to-Peer Networks for Smart Grids | Rohbogner, G. et al. | 2014 | Multi-agent-based voltage control system for P2P networks ensuring stable operation of distributed energy systems. |
77 | S-078 | [39] | Decentralized Active Power Management in Multi-Agent Distribution Systems Considering Congestion Issue | Tofighi-Milani, M. et al. | 2022 | Proposal of a decentralized power management system for multi-agent P2P networks under partial observability. |
78 | S-079 | [44] | Distributed Topology Optimization for Agent-based Peer-to-Peer Energy Market | Kilthau, M. | 2023 | Formulation of a distributed topology optimization model for agent-based control in smart grid energy trading. |
79 | WoS-011 | [40] | A Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Peer-to-Peer Energy Management Approach | Chang, X. et al. | 2023 | Development of a byzantine-resilient distributed framework for secure and trustworthy P2P energy trading. |
80 | WoS-019 | [90] | Designing a Robust Decentralized Energy Transactions Framework for Active Prosumers in Peer-to-Peer Local Electricity Markets | Mehdinejad, M. et al. | 2022 | Design of a robust decentralized energy trading mechanism focusing on fault tolerance and peer integrity. |
81 | WoS-022 | [31] | Two-Stage Credit Management for Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in Consortium Blockchain | Zhou, K. | 2024 | Two-stage credit management system to enhance trust and financial robustness in P2P energy exchanges. |
82 | WoS-023 | [73] | Modelling and analysis of a two-level incentive mechanism based peer-to-peer energy sharing community | Wang, Y. et al. | 2021 | Modeling of a two-level incentive system for motivating participants in P2P energy communities. |
83 | WoS-024 | [74] | Peer-to-Peer energy trading considering the output uncertainty of distributed energy resources | Xia, Y. et al. | 2022 | Optimization model for P2P trading that incorporates the impact of uncertainty in distributed generation. |
84 | WoS-031 | [41] | Multi-agent based energy community cost optimization considering high electric vehicles penetration | Faia, R. et al. | 2023 | Multi-agent-based optimization framework for cost-efficient energy exchange in community energy systems. |
85 | WoS-047 | [43] | A Cross-Layer Trust-Based Consensus Protocol for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Using Fuzzy Logic | Chowdhury, M. et al. | 2022 | Design of a trust-based consensus protocol to secure P2P transactions and mitigate dishonest behavior. |
86 | WoS-051 | [21] | A Multi-Agent Framework for P2P Energy Trading With EV Aggregators Supporting V2X Services | Singh, A. et al. | 2024 | Development of a multi-agent framework for EV-based P2P energy trading with charging station coordination. |
87 | WoS-053 | [88] | A Novel Distributed Paradigm for Energy Scheduling of Islanded Multiagent Microgrids | Tofighi-Milani, M. et al. | 2022 | Proposal of a distributed scheduling paradigm for decentralized energy management in transactive energy systems. |
88 | WoS-054 | [76] | Loss Allocation in Joint Transmission and Distribution Peer-to-Peer Markets | Moret, F. et al. | 2021 | Design of a novel loss allocation methodology combining transmission and distribution levels in P2P markets. |
89 | S-010 | [79] | Double-Consensus-Based Distributed Energy Management in a Virtual Power Plant | Naina, P. | 2022 | Implementation of a double-consensus distributed energy management strategy for microgrids enabling secure P2P coordination. |
90 | S-039 | [28] | An optimal energy management system for real-time operation of multiagent-based microgrids using a T-cell algorithm | Harmouch, F. et al. | 2019 | Design of an optimal real-time home energy management system supporting dynamic pricing and P2P energy flows. |
91 | WoS-059 | [20] | Power-Flow-Based Secondary Control for Autonomous Droop-Controlled AC Nanogrids With Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading | Roncero-Clemente, C. et al. | 2021 | Development of a secondary control model based on power flow estimation for autonomous P2P microgrids. |
92 | WoS-104 | [94] | Privacy-Preserving Distributed Learning for Renewable Energy Forecasting | Gonçalves, C. | 2021 | Proposal of a privacy-preserving distributed learning scheme for renewable energy forecasting in P2P systems. |
93 | S-006 | [78] | A Robust-Based Home Energy Management Model for Optimal Participation of Prosumers in Competitive P2P Platforms | Zetawi, A. et al. | 2024 | Design of a robust home energy management model integrating renewable energy and electric vehicles for P2P trading. |
94 | S-026 | [103] | Intent Profile Strategy for Virtual Power Plant Participation in Simultaneous Energy Markets With Dynamic Storage Management | Aguilar, J. et al. | 2022 | Introduction of an intent-based strategy for optimizing prosumer interactions within virtual power plant structures. |
References
- Tostado-Véliz, M.; Rezaee Jordehi, A.; Amir Mansouri, S.; Jurado, F. Day-Ahead Scheduling of 100% Isolated Communities under Uncertainties through a Novel Stochastic-Robust Model. Appl. Energy 2022, 328, 120257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Gooi, H.B.; Xin, H. Multi-Agent Based Optimal Scheduling and Trading for Multi-Microgrids Integrated with Urban Transportation Networks. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2021, 36, 2197–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chabla-Auqui, L.; Ochoa-Correa, D.; Villa-Ávila, E.; Astudillo-Salinas, P. Distributed Generation Applied to Residential Self-Supply in South America in the Decade 2013–2023: A Literature Review. Energies 2023, 16, 6207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, M.H.; Park, J.-D. Peer-to-Peer Energy Arbitrage in Prosumer-Based Smart Residential Distribution System. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Baltimore, MD, USA, 29 September–3 October 2019; IEEE: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2019; pp. 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Papadaskalopoulos, D.; Yuan, Q.; Tang, Y.; Strbac, G. Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Coordinated Energy Trading and Flexibility Services Provision in Local Electricity Markets. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2023, 14, 1541–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, D.; Ye, Y.; Papadaskalopoulos, D.; Strbac, G. Scalable Coordinated Management of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading: A Multi-Cluster Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. Appl. Energy 2021, 292, 116940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, C.; Zhou, J.; He, H.; Li, J.; Wei, Z.; Li, K.; Shi, M. A Novel Energy Management Strategy for Hybrid Electric Bus with Fuel Cell Health and Battery Thermal- and Health-Constrained Awareness. Energy 2023, 271, 127105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heess, P.; Holly, S.; Körner, M.-F.; Nieße, A.; Radtke, M.; Schick, L.; Stark, S.; Strüker, J.; Zwede, T. A Multi-Agent Approach with Verifiable and Data-Sovereign Information Flows for Decentralizing Redispatch in Distributed Energy Systems. Energy Inform. 2025, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, P.; Wang, X.; Li, Z. Impact and Optimization of Vehicle Charging Scheduling on Regional Clean Energy Power Supply Network Management. Energy Inform. 2025, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, A.; Zhou, Y. An Integrative Lifecycle Design Approach Based on Carbon Intensity for Renewable-Battery-Consumer Energy Systems. Commun. Eng. 2025, 4, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, N.; Ran, C. Design and Optimization of Distributed Energy Management System Based on Edge Computing and Machine Learning. Energy Inform. 2025, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Sun, Q.; Wang, X.; Shi, T.; Yang, X.; Xu, H. Low Carbon Planning of Flexible Distribution Network Considering Orderly Charging and Discharging of EV. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2025, 244, 111546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisapour-Moarref, A.; Sakhaei, H.; Zarghami, M.; Yazdani, A. Multi-Purpose Control of Bidirectional Converters for Power Management in Hybrid Microgrids Considering Electric Vehicles. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2025, 244, 111563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.S.; Oo, A.M.T. Distributed Multi-Agent Based Coordinated Power Management and Control Strategy for Microgrids with Distributed Energy Resources. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 139, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, P.; Zhao, J.; Yao, J.; Yang, S. A Decentralized Approach for Frequency Control and Economic Dispatch in Smart Grids. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 2017, 7, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, W.; Yang, Y. Impact Assessment of Shared Storage and Peer-to-Peer Trading on Industrial Buildings in the Presence of Electric Vehicle Parking Lots: A Hybrid Robust-CVaR Analysis. Energy Build. 2024, 304, 113847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, M.; Sun, W.; Wang, Y.; Shahidehpour, M.; Li, Z.; Gao, C. Hierarchical Scheduling of Aggregated TCL Flexibility for Transactive Energy in Power Systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2020, 11, 2452–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Abdallah, A.B. V2GNet: Robust Blockchain-Based Energy Trading Method and Implementation in Vehicle-to-Grid Network. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 131442–131455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Dai, J.; Gooi, H.B.; Nguyen, H.D.; Wang, P. Hierarchical Blockchain Design for Distributed Control and Energy Trading Within Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2022, 13, 3133–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roncero-Clemente, C.; Gonzalez-Romera, E.; Barrero-Gonzalez, F.; Milanes-Montero, M.I.; Romero-Cadaval, E. Power-Flow-Based Secondary Control for Autonomous Droop-Controlled AC Nanogrids with Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 22339–22350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Sampath, L.P.M.I.; Nguyen, D.H.; Gooi, H.B.; Nguyen, H.D. A Multi-Agent Framework for P2P Energy Trading with EV Aggregators Supporting V2X Services. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2024, 73, 18548–18559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majd, E.; Balakrishnan, V. A Trust Model for Recommender Agent Systems. Soft Comput. 2017, 21, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiaoguang, Z.; Fei, W.; Rui, Q.; Renwei, C.; Lu, W.; Yun, Z. Optimal Scheduling of Hierarchical Energy Systems with Controllable Load Demand Response. In Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering (CEEPE), Chongqing, China, 22–24 April 2022; IEEE: Chongqing, China, 2022; pp. 1178–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khojasteh, M.; Faria, P.; Vale, Z. A Distributed Robust ADMM-Based Model for the Energy Management in Local Energy Communities. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2023, 36, 101136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Y.; Xu, Y.; Li, J. Aggregator-Network Coordinated Peer-to-Peer Multi-Energy Trading via Adaptive Robust Stochastic Optimization. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2024, 39, 7124–7137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behrunani, V.N.; Irvine, A.; Belgioioso, G.; Heer, P.; Lygeros, J.; Dörfler, F. Designing Fairness in Autonomous Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2023, 56, 3751–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harmouch, F.Z.; Ebrahim, A.F.; Esfahani, M.M.; Krami, N.; Hmina, N.; Mohammed, O.A. An Optimal Energy Management System for Real-Time Operation of Multiagent-Based Microgrids Using a T-Cell Algorithm. Energies 2019, 12, 3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tostado-Véliz, M.; Rezaee Jordehi, A.; Icaza, D.; Mansouri, S.A.; Jurado, F. Optimal Participation of Prosumers in Energy Communities Through a Novel Stochastic-Robust Day-Ahead Scheduling Model. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 147, 108854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.; Sun, Y.; Jiao, M.; Liu, Z.; Hao, J. Bilateral Energy-Trading Model with Hierarchical Personalized Pricing in a Prosumer Community. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 141, 108179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, K.; Guo, J.; Zhou, J. Two-Stage Credit Management for Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in Consortium Blockchain. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2024, 20, 3868–3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, L.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Wen, J. A Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Community Energy Trading Scheme for a Neighborhood of Smart Households. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2022, 13, 4747–4758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, H.; Ribeiro, B.; Gomes, L.; Vale, Z. Smart Grid Ecosystem Modeling Using a Novel Framework for Heterogenous Agent Communities. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, G.; Huang, G.; Dong, C.; Xu, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, J. Distributed Mixed-Integer Fuzzy Hierarchical Programming for Municipal Solid Waste Management. Part I: System Identification and Methodology Development. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 7236–7252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Yi, Y. Multi-Microgrid Low-Carbon Economy Operation Strategy Considering Both Source and Load Uncertainty: A Nash Bargaining Approach. Energy 2023, 263, 125712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Shao, Z.; Chen, F.; Chen, Y.; Lin, Y.; Deng, H. Distributed Robust Operation Strategy of Multi-Microgrid Based on Peer-to-Peer Multi-Energy Trading. IET Energy Syst. Integr. 2023, 5, 376–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michon, D.; Masaud, T.M. Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Among Networked Microgrids Considering the Complementary Nature of Wind and PV Solar Energy. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE PES Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies—Middle East (ISGT Middle East), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 12–15 March 2023; IEEE: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afzali, P.; Rajaei, A.; Rashidinejad, M.; Farahmand, H. Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Among Prosumers in Energy Communities Based on Preferences Considering Holacracy Structure. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2024, 71, 7756–7767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tofighi-Milani, M.; Fattaheian-Dehkordi, S.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Lehtonen, M. Decentralized Active Power Management in Multi-Agent Distribution Systems Considering Congestion Issue. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2022, 13, 3582–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, X.; Xu, Y.; Guo, Q.; Sun, H.; Chan, W.K. A Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Peer-to-Peer Energy Management Approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2023, 14, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faia, R.; Ribeiro, B.; Goncalves, C.; Gomes, L.; Vale, Z. Multi-Agent Based Energy Community Cost Optimization Considering High Electric Vehicles Penetration. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 59, 103402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, D.; Xue, J.; Zhang, T.; Wang, J.; Sun, M. Federated Reinforcement Learning for Smart Building Joint Peer-to-Peer Energy and Carbon Allowance Trading. Appl. Energy 2023, 333, 120526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, M.J.M.; Usman, M.; Ferdous, S.; Chowdhury, N.; Harun, A.I.; Jannat, U.S.; Biswas, K. A Cross-Layer Trust-Based Consensus Protocol for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Using Fuzzy Logic. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 14779–14789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilthau, M.; Ansari, D.; Fay, A. Distributed Topology Optimization for Agent-Based Peer-to-Peer Energy Market. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm), Glasgow, UK, 31 October–3 November 2023; IEEE: Glasgow, UK, 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes, L.; Vale, Z.A.; Corchado, J.M. Multi-Agent Microgrid Management System for Single-Board Computers: A Case Study on Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 64169–64183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Z.-P.; Li, P.; Li, Z.-L.; Xia, J. A Fully Distributed Privacy-Preserving Energy Management System for Networked Microgrid Cluster Based on Homomorphic Encryption. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2024, 15, 1735–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, M.A.; Jin, T.; Su, W. Multi-Agent Energy Management of Smart Islands Using Primal-Dual Method of Multipliers. Energy 2020, 208, 118306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peterson, J.L.; Bay, B.; Koning, J.; Robinson, P.; Semler, J.; White, J.; Anirudh, R.; Athey, K.; Bremer, P.-T.; Di Natale, F.; et al. Enabling Machine Learning-Ready HPC Ensembles with Merlin. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2022, 131, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sifakis, N.K.; Kanellos, F.D. Real-Time Multi-Agent Based Power Management of Virtually Integrated Microgrids Comprising Prosumers of Plug-in Electric Vehicles and Renewable Energy Sources. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 161842–161865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanumantha Rao, B.; Arun, S.L.; Selvan, M.P. An Electric Power Trading Framework for Smart Residential Community in Smart Cities. IET Smart Cities 2019, 1, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, D.; Wang, J.; Dong, Z.; Wang, Y.; Strbac, G. Mean-Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Peer-to-Peer Multi-Energy Trading. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2023, 38, 4853–4866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.-Y.; Alano, F.I. Hierarchical Energy Management in Islanded Networked Microgrids. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 8121–8132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, C.; Shen, Z.; Xiao, D.; Wang, L.; Bai, X.; Chen, H. An Optimal Scheduling Strategy for Peer-to-Peer Trading in Interconnected Microgrids Based on RO and Nash Bargaining. Appl. Energy 2021, 295, 117024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Y.; Sun, X.; Ruan, J.; Shi, W.; Wu, H.; Xu, Z. Customized Decentralized Autonomous Organization Based Optimal Energy Management for Smart Buildings. Appl. Energy 2024, 376, 124223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, S.; Jin, X.; Huang, G.; Lai, A.C. Coordination of Commercial Prosumers with Distributed Demand-Side Flexibility in Energy Sharing and Management System. Energy 2022, 248, 123634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Romera, E.; Romero-Cadaval, E.; Roncero-Clemente, C.; Ruiz-Cortés, M.; Barrero-González, F.; Milanés Montero, M.-I.; Moreno-Muñoz, A. Secondary Control for Storage Power Converters in Isolated Nanogrids to Allow Peer-to-Peer Power Sharing. Electronics 2020, 9, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurdi, H.; Alshayban, B.; Altoaimy, L.; Alsalamah, S. TrustyFeer: A Subjective Logic Trust Model for Smart City Peer-to-Peer Federated Clouds. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2018, 2018, 1073216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Din, J.; Su, H.; Ali, S.; Salman, M. Research on Blockchain-Enabled Smart Grid for Anti-Theft Electricity Securing Peer-to-Peer Transactions in Modern Grids. Sensors 2024, 24, 1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Tan, S.-C.; Hui, S.Y.R. Power Loss Minimization of Parallel-Connected Distributed Energy Resources in DC Microgrids Using a Distributed Gradient Algorithm-Based Hierarchical Control. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2022, 13, 4538–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asheralieva, A.; Niyato, D. Distributed Dynamic Resource Management and Pricing in the IoT Systems with Blockchain-as-a-Service and UAV-Enabled Mobile Edge Computing. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 1974–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, L.; Crisostomiy, E. Distribution Loss Allocation in Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in a Network of Microgrids. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Montreal, QC, Canada, 2–6 August 2020; IEEE: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Tang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.-P.; Strbac, G. A Scalable Privacy-Preserving Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Large-Scale Peer-to-Peer Transactive Energy Trading. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2021, 12, 5185–5200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umar, A.; Kumar, D.; Ghose, T. Decentralized Energy Trading in Microgrids: A Blockchain-Integrated Model for Efficient Power Flow with Social Welfare Optimization. Electr. Eng. 2024, 107, 2677–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Sun, H.; Gu, W. A Novel Discounted Min-Consensus Algorithm for Optimal Electrical Power Trading in Grid-Connected DC Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 66, 8474–8484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Yang, W.; He, P.; Chen, C.; Wang, X. Design and Management of a Distributed Hybrid Energy System Through Smart Contract and Blockchain. Appl. Energy 2019, 248, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuel, O.; Javaid, N.; Alghamdi, T.A.; Kumar, N. Towards Sustainable Smart Cities: A Secure and Scalable Trading System for Residential Homes Using Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 76, 103371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cioara, T.; Antal, M.; Mihailescu, V.T.; Antal, C.D.; Anghel, I.M.; Mitrea, D. Blockchain-Based Decentralized Virtual Power Plants of Small Prosumers. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 29490–29504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yang, W.; Noor, S.; Chen, C.; Guo, M.; Van Dam, K.H. Blockchain-Based Smart Contract for Energy Demand Management. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 2719–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, V.; You, I.; Jayakody, D.N.K.; Reina, D.G.; Choo, K.-K.R. Neural-Blockchain-Based Ultrareliable Caching for Edge-Enabled UAV Networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019, 15, 5723–5736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Wei, W.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Q.; Catalao, J.P.S. An Energy Sharing Mechanism Achieving the Same Flexibility as Centralized Dispatch. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2021, 12, 3379–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohseni, S.; Pishvaee, M.S. Energy Trading and Scheduling in Networked Microgrids Using Fuzzy Bargaining Game Theory and Distributionally Robust Optimization. Appl. Energy 2023, 350, 121748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Symiakakis, M.S.; Kanellos, F.D. Towards the Detailed Modeling of Deregulated Electricity Markets Comprising Smart Prosumers and Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2023, 217, 109158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Li, Y.; Jiang, L.; Long, Y.; Deng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Nakanishi, Y. Modelling and Analysis of a Two-Level Incentive Mechanism Based Peer-to-Peer Energy Sharing Community. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 133, 107202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Y.; Xu, Q.; Qian, H.; Cai, L. Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Considering the Output Uncertainty of Distributed Energy Resources. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohbogner, G.; Fey, S.; Benoit, P.; Wittwer, C.; Christ, A. Design of a Multiagent-Based Voltage Control System in Peer-to-Peer Networks for Smart Grids. Energy Technol. 2014, 2, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moret, F.; Tosatto, A.; Baroche, T.; Pinson, P. Loss Allocation in Joint Transmission and Distribution Peer-to-Peer Markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2021, 36, 1833–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marzal, S.; González-Medina, R.; Salas-Puente, R.; Figueres, E.; Garcerá, G. A Novel Locality Algorithm and Peer-to-Peer Communication Infrastructure for Optimizing Network Performance in Smart Microgrids. Energies 2017, 10, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zetawi, A.A.; Tostado-Véliz, M.; Hasanien, H.M.; Jurado, F. A Robust-Based Home Energy Management Model for Optimal Participation of Prosumers in Competitive P2P Platforms. Energies 2024, 17, 5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naina, P.M.; Swarup, K.S. Double-Consensus-Based Distributed Energy Management in a Virtual Power Plant. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2022, 58, 7047–7056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, C.; Jia, Y.; Xu, Z. Peer-to-Peer Energy Cooperation in Building Community over A Lossy Network. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Washington, DC, USA, 26–29 July 2021; IEEE: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elkazaz, M.; Sumner, M.; Thomas, D. A Hierarchical and Decentralized Energy Management System for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading. Appl. Energy 2021, 291, 116766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Wiedmann, T.; Luo, F.; Yan, G.; Wen, F.; Broadbent, G.H. A Fully Decentralized Hierarchical Transactive Energy Framework for Charging EVs With Local DERs in Power Distribution Systems. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022, 8, 3041–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moradi, M.B.; Nazari, M.H.; Gharehpetian, G.B.; Hoseinian, S.H.; Nafisi, H. Peer-to-Peer Energy Transaction Incorporating Prosumers’ Tendency with Load and PV Uncertainty Consideration. In Proceedings of the 2024 11th Iranian Conference on Renewable Energy and Distribution Generation (ICREDG), Yazd, Iran, 6–7 March 2024; IEEE: Yazd, Iran, 2024; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, D.H.; Ishihara, T. Distributed Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading for Residential Fuel Cell Combined Heat and Power Systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 125, 106533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, G.; Tao, Y.; Xu, L.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, J.; Lai, S. Coordinated Management of Aggregated Electric Vehicles and Thermostatically Controlled Loads in Hierarchical Energy Systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 131, 107090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravivarma, K.; Lokeshgupta, B. A Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Model for Community Microgrids with Energy Management. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2024, 17, 2538–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, F.; Zeng, J.; Lin, J.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, C. A Stochastic Hierarchical Optimization and Revenue Allocation Approach for Multi-Regional Integrated Energy Systems Based on Cooperative Games. Appl. Energy 2023, 350, 121701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tofighi-Milani, M.; Fattaheian-Dehkordi, S.; Gholami, M.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Lehtonen, M. A Novel Distributed Paradigm for Energy Scheduling of Islanded Multiagent Microgrids. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 83636–83649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saatloo, A.M.; Mirzaei, M.A.; Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. A Robust Decentralized Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in Community of Flexible Microgrids. IEEE Syst. J. 2023, 17, 640–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehdinejad, M.; Shayanfar, H.A.; Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B.; Nafisi, H. Designing a Robust Decentralized Energy Transactions Framework for Active Prosumers in Peer-to-Peer Local Electricity Markets. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 26743–26755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, J. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Energy Trading and Load Scheduling in Residential Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Market. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 147, 108885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoudian Esfahani, M. A Hierarchical Blockchain-Based Electricity Market Framework for Energy Transactions in a Security-Constrained Cluster of Microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 139, 108011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moridi, E.; Haghparast, M.; Hosseinzadeh, M.; Jassbi, S.J. A Novel Hierarchical Fault Management Framework for Wireless Sensor Networks: HFMF. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2022, 15, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goncalves, C.; Bessa, R.J.; Pinson, P. Privacy-Preserving Distributed Learning for Renewable Energy Forecasting. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2021, 12, 1777–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakshminarayanan, V.; Rajashekara, K.; Zhu, B. Multi-Agent System Architecture for Enhanced Resiliency in Autonomous Microgrids. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Chicago, IL, USA, 16–20 July 2017; IEEE: Chicago, IL, USA, 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Strbac, G. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Automated Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in Double-Side Auction Market. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-21), Montreal, QC, Canada, 19–26 August 2021; IJCAI: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2021; pp. 2913–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Khodayar, M.E.; Wang, J.; Zhou, B. Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Co-Optimization of P2P Energy Trading and Network Operation for Interconnected Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2021, 12, 5172–5184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charbonnier, F.; Morstyn, T.; McCulloch, M.D. Scalable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Distributed Control of Residential Energy Flexibility. Appl. Energy 2022, 314, 118825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, M.H.; Park, J.-D. A Two-Tier Distributed Market Clearing Scheme for Peer-to-Peer Energy Sharing in Smart Grid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 18, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulestreau, Y.; Peyras, C.-L.; Casagrande, M.; Navarrete, M. Tracking Down Coupled Innovations Supporting Agroecological Vegetable Crop Protection to Foster Sustainability Transition of Agrifood Systems. Agric. Syst. 2022, 196, 103354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keller, H.H.; Carrier, N.; Slaughter, S.; Lengyel, C.; Steele, C.M.; Duizer, L.; Brown, K.S.; Chaudhury, H.; Yoon, M.N.; Duncan, A.M.; et al. Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3): Protocol of a Multi-Centre Cross-Sectional Study of Food Intake and Its Determinants in Older Adults Living in Long Term Care Homes. BMC Geriatr. 2017, 17, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Datta, J.; Das, D. Robust Energy Management of Multi-Microgrids System Considering Incentive-Based Demand Response Using Price Elasticity. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE PES 14th Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Melbourne, Australia, 20–23 November 2022; IEEE: Melbourne, Australia, 2022; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilar, J.; Bordons, C.; Arce, A.; Galan, R. Intent Profile Strategy for Virtual Power Plant Participation in Simultaneous Energy Markets With Dynamic Storage Management. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 22599–22609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Theme | Ref. | Challenges | Future Directions |
---|---|---|---|
1. Optimization and Modeling in Energy Systems | [1,2,3,4,5] | Addressing multi-objective optimization with conflicting goals; limited scalability of models for large-scale distributed systems; incorporation of dynamic market uncertainties. | Development of integrated AI and robust optimization frameworks; deployment of real-time optimization techniques to enhance responsiveness in dynamic environments. |
2. MAS and Distributed Control | [5,12,14,15,17,20] | Scalability in large and complex systems; ensuring data privacy in multi-agent environments; effective coordination in systems with heterogeneous agents and varied energy profiles. | Implementation of federated learning within MAS for privacy-preserving operations; adoption of advanced clustering methods to manage scalability; increased focus on cybersecurity mechanisms in distributed networks. |
3. Simulations, Case Studies, and Real-World Applications | [21,22,23,24,25] | Bridging the gap between simulated and real-world performance; addressing the variability of real-world factors such as renewable intermittency, market volatility, and consumer behavior. | Use of hardware-in-the-loop simulations for enhanced validation; development of simulation models incorporating real-world data to improve accuracy and reliability. |
4. Blockchain, Smart Contracts, and Emerging Technologies | [30,31,32,33,34,35,36] | High computational costs of traditional blockchain systems; challenges in ensuring scalability and efficiency; addressing regulatory compliance and privacy concerns. | Development of lightweight blockchain systems; integration of trust-based consensus protocols; leveraging hybrid blockchain models combining public and private elements for efficiency and security. |
5. Frameworks for Robust and Decentralized Energy Management | [39,40,41,42,43,45] | Balancing robustness with sustainability; handling uncertainties in decentralized systems; integrating fault tolerance in real-time operations. | Application of predictive control and AI to enhance adaptability; designing fault-tolerant mechanisms for decentralized systems; improved coordination among energy resources in interconnected microgrids. |
6. Electric Machines and Their Role in DES | [42,44,46,48] | Adapting traditional machines for variable renewable integration; managing efficiency losses in high-demand scenarios; ensuring compatibility with advanced control systems. | Enhancing designs of reluctance generators and synchronous machines for renewable applications; integrating real-time monitoring and adaptive controls for energy conversion systems; advancing V2G technology for microgrid applications. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Arévalo, P.; Ochoa-Correa, D.; Villa-Ávila, E.; Iñiguez-Morán, V.; Astudillo-Salinas, P. Systematic Review of Hierarchical and Multi-Agent Optimization Strategies for P2P Energy Management and Electric Machines in Microgrids. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094817
Arévalo P, Ochoa-Correa D, Villa-Ávila E, Iñiguez-Morán V, Astudillo-Salinas P. Systematic Review of Hierarchical and Multi-Agent Optimization Strategies for P2P Energy Management and Electric Machines in Microgrids. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(9):4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094817
Chicago/Turabian StyleArévalo, Paul, Danny Ochoa-Correa, Edisson Villa-Ávila, Vinicio Iñiguez-Morán, and Patricio Astudillo-Salinas. 2025. "Systematic Review of Hierarchical and Multi-Agent Optimization Strategies for P2P Energy Management and Electric Machines in Microgrids" Applied Sciences 15, no. 9: 4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094817
APA StyleArévalo, P., Ochoa-Correa, D., Villa-Ávila, E., Iñiguez-Morán, V., & Astudillo-Salinas, P. (2025). Systematic Review of Hierarchical and Multi-Agent Optimization Strategies for P2P Energy Management and Electric Machines in Microgrids. Applied Sciences, 15(9), 4817. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094817