Influence of Curing Conditions on the Strength Properties of Polysulfide Polymer Concrete
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Mixing Proportion
2.3. Strength Test Methods
3. Results
3.1. General
3.2. Compressive Strength
3.3. Flexural Strength
3.4. Bond Strength
4. Discussion
4.1. Strength Increase Rate
4.2. Relationship among Strengths
4.3. Strength Ratios
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- In the polysulfide polymer concrete used for this study, approximately 27% of the compressive strength at 672 h (28 days) developed after approximately 6 h of curing, and approximately 80% of the compressive strength developed within 168 h (7 days). These development times are considerably shorter than those for cement concrete. Furthermore, the greater the curing temperature, the more consistently low the compressive strength. In particular, some specimens could not achieve the minimum compressive strength value of 34 MPa recommended in the ACI 548.9 guideline, despite their longer curing times. It was also found that curing temperatures above 40 °C have an adverse effect on the compressive strength of polysulfide polymer concrete.
- (2)
- The development of flexural strength depended significantly on the curing temperature. The flexural strength decreased gradually up to a curing temperature of 20 °C and then decreased rapidly above this temperature. The specimens cured at temperatures above 40 °C showed a flexural strength value lower than 14 MPa, which is the minimum value recommended in the ACI 548.5 guideline.
- (3)
- Tests for assessing the bond strength between polysulfide polymer concrete and steel showed an average bond strength of 4.8 MPa, and the bond strengths for all the curing temperatures considered in this test were higher than 1.7 MPa, which is the minimum value recommended in the ACI 548.9 guideline.
- (4)
- Regression analyses of the relationships between the flexural and compressive strengths and between the bond and compressive strengths revealed very large correlation coefficients of 0.983 and 0.940, respectively. These values indicate that the regression equations derived from the results can be effectively used to estimate the flexural and bond strengths from a known value of compressive strength.
- (5)
- In this study, the effects of curing temperature and curing time on polysulfide polymer concrete were assessed. However, these results hold true only under laboratory conditions. Accordingly, additional laboratory tests and on-site tests need to be conducted in the future in order to draw more generalized conclusions regarding the properties of polysulfide polymer concrete.
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mehta, P.K. Durability-critical issues for the future. Concr. Int. 1995, 19, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
- Fowler, D.W. Polymers in concrete: A vision for the 21st century. Cem. Concr. Comp. 1999, 21, 449–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohama, Y. Recent progress in concrete-polymer composites. Adv. Cem. Based. Mater. 1997, 5, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirlikovali, E. Polymer/concrete composites: A review. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1981, 21, 507–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kemp, T.J.; Wiford, A.; Howarth, O.W.; Lee, T.C.P. Structural and materials properties of a polysulphide- modified epoxide resin. Polymer 1992, 33, 1860–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbier, J.W.; Hanhela, P.J.; Huang, R.H.; Paul, D.B. Effect of temperature on the storage life of polysulfide aircraft sealants. Polym. Test. 1990, 9, 291–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewe, G.B. The Durability of the Adhesion of Polysulfide Sealants to Glass. Ph.D. Thesis, De Montford University, Leicester, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Panek, J.R.; Cook, J.P. Construction Sealants and Adhesives, 2nd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Depuy, G.W. Polymer-modified concrete-properties and applications. Constr. Repair 1996, 10, 63–67. [Google Scholar]
- Ohama, Y. Handbook of Polymer-Modified Concrete and Mortar Properties and Process Technology, 1st ed.; Noyes Publications: Park Ridge, NJ, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Dinitz, A.M.; Michael, S.S. The successful use of thin polysulfide epoxy polymer concrete overlays on concrete and steel orthotropic bridge decks. In Proceedings of the 2010 Structures Congress, Orlando, FL, USA, 12–15 May 2010; Senapathi, S., Casey, K., Hoit, M., Eds.; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2010; pp. 530–540. [Google Scholar]
- Michael, S.S.; Arif, J.C. Thin polysulfide epoxy bridge deck overlays. Transp. Res. Rec. 2001, 1749, 64–67. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.H.; Suh, Y.C. Laboratory evaluation of polysulfide epoxy overlay material for bridge decks. J. Korean Soc. Road Eng. 2011, 13, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.J. The Physical Properties of Polymer Concrete for Ultra-Thin Bridge Deck Pavements. Master’s Thesis, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Report on Polymer-Modified Concrete; ACI 548.3R-09; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2009.
- Rebeiz, K.S. Time-temperature properties of polymer concrete using recycled PET. Cem. Concr. Comp. 1995, 17, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vipulanandan, C.; Dharmarajan, N. Effect of temperature on the fracture properties of epoxy polymer concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 1988, 18, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oussama, E.; Elhem, G.; Valérie, M. Mechanical and physical properties of epoxy polymer concrete after exposure to temperatures of up to 250 °C. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 27, 415–424. [Google Scholar]
- Lindvall, A. Environmental Actions on Concrete Exposed to Marine and Road Environments and Its Response. Ph.D. Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Ramalingam, S.; Santhanam, M. Environmental exposure classifications for concrete construction: A relook. Indian Concr. J. 2012, 86, 18–28. [Google Scholar]
- Issa, M.A. Investigation of cracking in concrete bridge decks at early ages. J. Bridge Eng. 2003, 4, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guide to Selecting Protective Treatments for Concrete; ACI 515.2R-13; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2013.
- Reis, J.M.L.; Ferreira, A.J.M. Freeze-thaw and thermal degradation influence on the fracture properties of carbon- and glass fiber-reinforced polymer concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2006, 20, 888–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, S.W.; Yeon, J. Mechanical properties of acrylic polymer concrete containing methacrylic acid as an additive. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 37, 669–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, N. Moisture sensitivity of polyester and acrylic polymer concrete with metallic monomer powders. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 107, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shokrieh, M.M.; Heidari-Rarani, M.; Shakouri, M.; Kashizadeh, E. Effects of thermal cycles on the mechanical properties of an optimized polymer concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 3540–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metin, H.; Serhat, G. The effect of low-temperature curing on the compressive strength of ordinary and high-performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2005, 19, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
- Haddad, M.U.; Fowler, D.W.; Paul, D.R. Factors affecting the curing and strength of polymer concrete. ACI J. 1983, 80, 396–402. [Google Scholar]
- Mindess, S.; Young, J.F.; Darwin, D. Concrete, 2nd ed.; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Jo, B.W.; Yoon, K.W.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H. An experimental study on the mechanical properties of ultra-high-strength powder concrete. J. Korea Concr. Inst. 2010, 22, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standard Test Methods for the Compressive Strength of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings and Polymer Concretes; ASTM C579; American Society for Testing and Materials: Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
- Standard Test Method for the Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Chemical-Resistant Mortars, Grouts, Monolithic Surfacings, and Polymer Concretes; ASTM C580; American Society for Testing and Materials: Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
- Standard Test Method for the Tensile Strength of Concrete Surfaces and the Bond Strength or Tensile Strength of Concrete Repair and Overlay Materials by Direct Tension Pull-off Method; ASTM C1583; American Society for Testing and Materials: Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004.
- Shin, H.M. Reinforced Concrete, 11th ed.; Dongmyeong Publishers: Paju, Korea, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Specifications for Type-ES Epoxy Slurry Polymer Overlays for Bridge and Parking Garage Decks; ACI 548.9; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2008.
- KCI. Concrete Design Code; Korean Concrete Institute: Seoul, Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Klieger, P. Effect of mixing and curing temperature on concrete strength. J. Am. Concr. Inst. 1958, 54, 1063–1081. [Google Scholar]
- Guide for Polymer Concrete Overlays; ACI 548.5R; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 1998.
Epoxy Equivalent Weight | Viscosity | Hydrolyzable Chlorine Content | Specific Gravity |
---|---|---|---|
(g/eq) | (25 °C, mPa·s) | (%, max) | (20 °C) |
184–190 | 11,500–13,500 | 0.05 | 1.17 |
Molecular Weight | Viscosity | Moisture | Specific Gravity | Mercaptan Content |
---|---|---|---|---|
(g/mol) | (25 °C, mPa·s) | (%, max) | (20 °C) | (%) |
1000 | 940–1440 | 0.1 | 1.29 | 5.9–7.7 |
Molecular Weight | Viscosity | Specific Gravity | Density |
---|---|---|---|
(g/mol) | (25 °C, mPa·s) | (20 °C) | (20 °C, kg/m3) |
230 | 9 | 0.948 | 946.7 |
Size | Specific Gravity | Unit Weight | Absorption | Solid Volume | Finesse Modulus | Water Content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mm) | (20 °C) | (kg/m3) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) |
0.35–0.7 | 2.64 | 1670 | 1.56 | 64.9 | 2.65 | <0.1 |
SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | Cao | MgO | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) |
83.22 | 10.00 | 2.21 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 3.99 |
Binder Content | Binder Formation (wt. %) | Filler | Aggregate | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(wt. %) | Bisphenol A-epoxy resin | Polysulfide liquid polymer | Hardener | (wt. %) | (wt. %) |
28.6 | 13.98 | 9.32 | 5.3 | 21.4 | 50 |
Strength | Curing | Specimen | Ave. | C.V. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. 1 | No. 2 | No. 3 | |||||||||
MPa | ksi | MPa | ksi | MPa | ksi | MPa | ksi | % | |||
Comp. | Time (h) | 3 | 9.41 | 1.36 | 9.80 | 1.42 | 9.64 | 1.40 | 9.62 | 1.39 | 2.0 |
6 | 13.88 | 2.01 | 14.03 | 2.04 | 14.27 | 2.07 | 14.06 | 2.04 | 1.4 | ||
24 | 37.91 | 5.50 | 36.22 | 5.25 | 33.87 | 4.91 | 36.00 | 5.22 | 5.6 | ||
168 | 44.85 | 6.50 | 36.30 | 5.26 | 42.96 | 6.23 | 41.37 | 6.00 | 10.9 | ||
336 | 45.63 | 6.62 | 54.72 | 7.94 | 45.63 | 6.62 | 48.66 | 7.06 | 10.8 | ||
672 | 49.63 | 7.20 | 51.12 | 7.41 | 53.47 | 7.76 | 51.41 | 7.46 | 3.8 | ||
Temp. (°C) | −10 | 58.33 | 8.46 | 55.90 | 8.11 | 54.96 | 7.97 | 56.40 | 8.18 | 3.1 | |
5 | 49.20 | 7.14 | 49.78 | 7.22 | 49.90 | 7.24 | 49.63 | 7.20 | 0.8 | ||
20 | 44.85 | 6.50 | 36.30 | 5.26 | 42.96 | 6.23 | 41.37 | 6.00 | 10.9 | ||
40 | 33.95 | 4.92 | 27.91 | 4.05 | 30.65 | 4.45 | 30.84 | 4.47 | 9.8 | ||
60 | 13.25 | 1.92 | 19.44 | 2.82 | 15.52 | 2.25 | 16.07 | 2.33 | 19.5 | ||
Flex. | Temp. (°C) | −10 | 27.34 | 3.96 | 27.58 | 4.00 | 27.44 | 3.98 | 27.45 | 3.98 | 0.44 |
5 | 26.29 | 3.81 | 25.89 | 3.76 | 25.47 | 3.69 | 25.88 | 3.75 | 1.58 | ||
20 | 23.24 | 3.37 | 22.03 | 3.20 | 24.98 | 3.62 | 23.42 | 3.40 | 6.33 | ||
40 | 12.83 | 1.86 | 13.54 | 1.96 | 12.59 | 1.83 | 12.99 | 1.88 | 3.80 | ||
60 | 6.33 | 0.92 | 6.07 | 0.88 | 6.12 | 0.89 | 6.17 | 0.90 | 2.23 | ||
Bond | Temp. (°C) | −10 | 5.85 | 0.85 | 4.50 | 0.65 | 7.82 | 1.13 | 6.06 | 0.88 | 27.57 |
5 | 6.94 | 1.01 | 9.05 | 1.31 | 6.01 | 0.87 | 7.33 | 1.06 | 21.24 | ||
20 | 3.93 | 0.57 | 4.84 | 0.70 | 4.40 | 0.64 | 4.39 | 0.64 | 10.37 | ||
40 | 3.54 | 0.51 | 5.22 | 0.76 | 4.24 | 0.61 | 4.33 | 0.63 | 19.47 | ||
60 | 1.80 | 0.26 | 1.94 | 0.28 | 1.71 | 0.25 | 1.82 | 0.26 | 6.38 |
Curing Temperature | Strength Ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|
Flexural/Compressive | Bond/Compressive | Flexural/Bond | |
(°C) | (-) | (-) | (-) |
−10 | 0.487 | 0.107 | 0.221 |
5 | 0.521 | 0.148 | 0.283 |
20 | 0.566 | 0.106 | 0.187 |
40 | 0.421 | 0.140 | 0.334 |
60 | 0.384 | 0.113 | 0.295 |
Average | 0.476 | 0.123 | 0.264 |
© 2017 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hong, S. Influence of Curing Conditions on the Strength Properties of Polysulfide Polymer Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7080833
Hong S. Influence of Curing Conditions on the Strength Properties of Polysulfide Polymer Concrete. Applied Sciences. 2017; 7(8):833. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7080833
Chicago/Turabian StyleHong, Sungnam. 2017. "Influence of Curing Conditions on the Strength Properties of Polysulfide Polymer Concrete" Applied Sciences 7, no. 8: 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7080833
APA StyleHong, S. (2017). Influence of Curing Conditions on the Strength Properties of Polysulfide Polymer Concrete. Applied Sciences, 7(8), 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7080833