Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the Seismic Performance of Recycled Concrete Hollow Block Masonry Walls
Previous Article in Journal
Fixed Grid Numerical Models for Solidification and Melting of Phase Change Materials (PCMs)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Investigation on Component Separation and Structure Characterization of Medium-Low Temperature Coal Tar

Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(20), 4335; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9204335
by Ning Zhao 1, Dong Liu 1,*, Hui Du 2, Congcong Wang 1, Fushan Wen 1 and Nan Shi 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(20), 4335; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9204335
Submission received: 11 September 2019 / Revised: 5 October 2019 / Accepted: 12 October 2019 / Published: 15 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical and Molecular Sciences)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The aim of the paper was to investigate the component separation and structure characterization of medium-low temperature coal tar. The manuscript is well constructed and the idea of the work seems to be very
interesting. The results are clearly presented, and the conclusions are consistent with the results obtained. I believe that the manuscript can be accepted in current form.

Author Response

Dear expert:
Thank you very much for you to review my manuscript. The revision has been revised as required, and the changes in the revision have been highlight by red color. The main contents of revision are listed as follow:
The Featured Application Part is provided.
Modified the format of manuscript refer to attached template.
Minor spell check is complemented.
A few references are added.
The revision can be seen in the attachment.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,
Ning Zhao
29 Sep 2019

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Currently, the development of processing technology of MLCT is limited by an insufficient  understanding of its chemical composition and structure. Therefore, quantitative analysis of the molecular composition of MLCT are required.

From my point of view, the idea and objective of the manuscript is good. The article is well structured.

However, some suggestions are recommended for the further improvement of the manuscript:

- Minor spell check is advised, such as in lines 106, 121, 160, 180, 243, 253,…

- A reference is needed in line 182 to justify the results.

- More information about the sample is required.

- Although a complete state of the art has been carried out in the introduction section, some references to justify the similar results found by other authors or to support the results and conclusions shown in this paper are recommended.

Author Response

Dear expert:

Thank you very much for you to review my manuscript. The revision has been revised as required, and the changes in the revision have been highlight by red color. The main contents of revision are listed as follow:

The Featured Application Part is provided. Modified the format of manuscript refer to attached template. Minor spell check is complemented. A few references are added. The revision can be seen in the attachment.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours sincerely,

Ning Zhao

29 Sep 2019

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop