Next Article in Journal
The Sound of Emotion: Pinpointing Emotional Voice Processing Via Frequency Tagging EEG
Previous Article in Journal
The Psychological Reality of Chinese Deliberate Metaphors from the Reception Side: An Experimental Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pharmaco-Toxicological Effects of Atypical Synthetic Cathinone Mephtetramine (MTTA) in Mice: Possible Reasons for Its Brief Appearance over NPSs Scene

1
Department of Translational Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, LTTA Center and University Center of Gender Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
2
Department of Environmental Sciences and Prevention, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
3
Forensic Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore F. Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, 00169 Rome, Italy
4
Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
5
University Center for Studies on Gender Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
6
Collaborative Center for the Italian National Early Warning System, Department of Anti-Drug Policies, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, 00186 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(2), 161; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020161
Submission received: 23 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 18 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Behavioral Neuroscience)

Abstract

:
Over the last year, NPSs have been steadily on the rise in the illicit drug market. Among these, synthetic cathinones seem to become increasingly popular among young adults, mainly because of their ability to replicate the effects of traditional psychostimulant drugs, such as cocaine, MDMA and amphetamines. However, scarce data are available about the in vivo pharmaco-toxicology of these new substances. To this end, this study focused on evaluation of effects induced by repeated administration of mephtetramine (MTTA 0.1–30 mg/kg i.p.) in mice. This atypical cathinone highlighted a sensorial (inhibition of visual and acoustic reflexes) and transient physiological parameter (decrease in breath rate and temperature) change in mice. Regarding motor activity, both a dose-dependent increase (accelerod test) and biphasic effect (drag and mobility time test) have been shown. In addition, blood and urine samples have been analysed to enrich the experimental featuring of the present study with reference to evaluation of potential toxicity related to consumption of MTTA. The latter analysis has particularly revealed important changes in blood cells count and blood and urine physicochemical profile after repeated treatment with this atypical cathinone. Moreover, MTTA induced histological changes in heart, kidney and liver samples, emphasizing its potential toxicity.

1. Introduction

Since new psychoactive substances (NPSs) have surfaced in the worldwide illicit drug market, they have quickly established themselves as a public health emergency and become one of the major international concerns [1]. To date, over 1100 different NPSs have been reported to the UNODC Early Warning Advisory (EWA) by its member states [2]. Despite efforts to counter it, the European drug market has also demonstrated greater diffusion and availability of NPSs with a diverse range of increasing purity or potency [3]. Even during the difficult lockdown period due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the NPSs market remained remarkably resilient, with successful deliveries of purchased drugs on the Darknet [4]. Unexpectedly, 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine (MDMA), lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), main amphetamine-like psychostimulants, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromophenethylamine (2C-B) and cocaine were the main purchased drugs [4]. These substances belong to the so-called ‘club drugs’ or ‘party pills’, commonly taken by young adults (age 15–35) who regularly attend pubs, nightclubs, music festivals and rave parties [5,6]. Among these, synthetic cathinones (SCs) represent one of the primary NPSs classes often seized in Europe, with use of the above-mentioned substances also for home consumption and/or alone [3]. SCs, commonly known as ‘bath salts’, are chemical derivatives of the natural khat plant (Catha edulis), which were first detected in Europe in 2008 [7].
SCs have gained high praise because they have been marketed as cheap substitutes for well-known psychostimulants amphetamine (AMPH), MDMA and cocaine [8,9], which, in addition to their purely stimulating effect, also induce pleasant effects, such as greater euphoria, empathy, sociability, increased libido and sexual performance [10,11]. However, SCs can be much more potent than the traditional psychostimulant drugs they imitate [12], and, therefore, the possibility of acute toxicity and death may be greater. To date, there are some substances, such as mephedrone (4-MCC), pentedrone and MDPV, that present both stimulating/empathogenic properties and stimulating/hallucinogenic effects [13,14]. Despite this, 2-((methylamino)methyl)-3,4-dihydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one or γ-mephtetramine (MTTA, Figure 1) turns out to be an atypical cathinone due to a further carbon between the amine and ketone group [15].
In fact, MTTA is a γ-aminoketone structurally similar to buphedrone or a mephedrone derivative, which is its positional isomer (Figure 1). Therefore, it should be assumed that MTTA exhibits a similar pharmacological and toxicological profile to one of these two aforementioned cathinones. Different from buphedrone, mephedrone is classified as MDMA–cocaine-like in terms of interaction with monoamine transporters [16,17,18]. However, information available in scientific literature about MTTA is scarce. Odoardi and her colleagues, through the first metabolism study performed in silico and followed by in vivo experiments, have recently shown that MTTA produces around 10 main metabolites in murine urine [19]. MTTA was first released and reported by the UK in 2013 [20], and in the same year it was also found in tools seized on Italian soil [21]. A peculiarity of MTTA was the fact that it emerged as quickly as it later disappeared from the clandestine drug market [22]. This coincides with a decrease in the number of new cathinones detected in those years and a simultaneous increase in other groups of stimulants and phenethylamines [23]. A previous study has already hypothesised that this trend could be due to limitations of substitutions that the skeleton of the cathinone can bear [24], hence the need to draw on other groups for synthesis of new active compounds. Therefore, these trends did not allow to better identify the properties of substances and provide important information about adverse effects in humans at the same time. Psychonaut websites such as bluelight (http://bluelight.org/, accessed on 5 December 2022) and land-der-träume (https://www.land-der-traeume.de/, accessed on 5 December 2022) report some anecdotes about MTTA use dating back to 2013 and describing it as completely ineffective [25] or as able to slightly increase talkativeness without having euphoric effects [26]. Conversely, other users report having consumed MTTA powder una tantum, indicating that it can provide a feeling of euphoria through progressive mental stimulation (between two and ten hours) that can extend until achieving a hallucinatory state. Therefore, they suggested that anyone trying MTTA should avoid driving or walking to a destination and opt for paid transportation options [27]. This evidence, reported on drug forums by users, implies that MTTA abuse could impair normal driving or working performance, as already ascertained for other different types of NPSs [28,29,30,31]. Thus, this could represent a severe issue for public health, indicating the urgent need to investigate the potential link between sensorimotor alterations and affected driving and working human skills, as previously suggested by preclinical studies [32,33].
Considering the poor preclinical in vivo evidence of MTTA, the aim of this study is to understand its pharmaco-toxicological potential. Given the occasional and sporadic use reported by testimonials from drug-forums, increasing dosages of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg) have been administered once a week for four consecutive weeks to mimic a typical pattern of human consumption. Specifically, effects induced by treatment with MTTA on sensorimotor (visual, acoustic and tactile) responses, physiological parameters (breath rate, core temperature and surface temperature), motor performance (time on rod, number of steps and mobility time) and grip strength have been investigated in CD-1 male mice through a selected battery of behavioural tests widely used for preclinical characterisation of new psychoactive molecules. To deepen the knowledge of its pharmaco-toxicological action, possible variations characterising the blood (Scil Vet abc + and Element RC devices) and urine (Aution Micro device) biochemical profiles and heart, spleen, kidney and liver damage have been also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

A total of 32 male ICR (CD-1®) mice, 3–4 months old, weighing 25–30 gr (ENVIGO Harlan Italy, Italy; bred inside the Laboratory for Preclinical Research (LARP) of University of Ferrara, Italy) were group-housed (5 mice per cage; a floor area per animal of 80 cm2; a minimum enclosure height of 12 cm on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle (light on at 6:30 AM), temperature of 20–22 °C, humidity of 45–55% and were provided ad libitum access to food (Diet 4RF25 GLP; Mucedola, Settimo Milanese, Milan, Italy) and water. Experiments were performed during the light phase. The experimental protocol followed in the present study was in accordance with the new European Communities Council Directive of September 2010 (2010/63/EU), a revision of the Directive 86/609/EEC, and was approved by the Italian Ministry of Health (license n. 223/2021-PR and extension CBCC2.46.EXT.21) and the Ethics Committee of the University of Ferrara. According to the ARRIVE guidelines, all possible efforts were made to minimise the number of animals used, minimise the animals’ pain and discomfort and reduce the number of experimental subjects. Mice were divided into two groups: group one (G1) was used for behavioural test (vehicle and repeated MTTA treatment) and group two (G2) for biochemical analysis of biological samples and histological evaluation of heart, spleen and kidney (vehicle and repeated MTTA treatment). Experimental protocol was reported in Figure 2.

2.2. Drug Preparation and Dose Selection

The MTTA was purchased from LGC Standards (LGC Standards, Milan, Italy). The compound was initially dissolved in absolute ethanol (final concentration: 2%) and Tween 80 (2%) and brought to the final volume with saline (0.9% p/v NaCl). The solution made with ethanol, Tween 80 and saline was also used as the vehicle. Drug was administered by intraperitoneal route at a volume of 4 ul/g body mass. The range of drug doses of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg i.p.) was chosen using interspecies dose scaling [34]. Increasing doses of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg i.p.) were administered once a week for four consecutive weeks and a wash-out time of 7 days was considered as dosing interval. The present protocol aims at mimicking sporadic human consumption of MTTA (see Section 1).

2.3. Behavioural Tests

In the present study, effect induced by each dosage of MTTA on behavioural responses was investigated using a battery of tests widely used in studies of “safety-pharmacology” in rodents [35,36,37,38,39]. To reduce the number of animals used, mice were evaluated in functional observational tests carried out in a consecutive manner according to the following time scheme: observation of visual object responses (frontal and lateral view), overall tactile response (vibrissae, corneal and pinnae reflexes), acoustic response, visual placing response, breath rate, mobility time, core and surface temperature variations, time on rod, number of step and grip strength response. Behavioural tests were conducted in a thermostat-controlled (temperature: 20–22 °C, humidity: 45–55%) and light (150 lux) room with a background noise of 40 ± 4 dB. The apparatus for sensorimotor and physiological test consisted of an experimental chamber (350 × 350 × 350 mm) with black methacrylate walls and a transparent front door. During the week before the experiment, each mouse was placed in the box and handled (once a day) every other day, i.e., 3 times, to get used to both the environment and the experimenter. To avoid mice olfactory cues, cages were carefully cleaned with a dilute (5%) ethanol solution and rinsed with water. All experiments were performed between 8:30 AM to 2:00 PM and conducted in blind by trained observers working in pairs [36]. The behaviour of mice was videotaped by a camera (B/W USB Camera day&night with varifocal lens; Ugo Basile, Italy) placed at the top or on one side of the box and analysed offline by a different trained operator.

2.3.1. Evaluation of the Visual Response

Visual response was verified by two behavioural tests which evaluated the ability of the animal to capture visual information when the animal is moving (the visual placing response) or stationary (the visual object response). Visual placing response test is performed using a tail suspension modified apparatus able to bring down the mouse towards the floor at a constant speed of 10 cm/s [36]. The downward movement of the mouse was videotaped by a camera (B/W USB Cameraday&night with varifocal lens; Ugo Basile, Italy) placed at the base of the tail suspension apparatus. Movies were analysed off-line by a trained operator who was unaware of the drug treatments performed, to evaluate the beginning of the reaction of the mouse approaching the floor. When the mouse started the reaction, an electronic ruler evaluated the perpendicular distance in millimetres between the eyes of the mice to the floor. Untreated control mice typically perceive the floor and prepare to contact at a distance of about 28 ± 4.3 mm. Tests were measured at 15, 35, 70, 125, 185, 245 and 305 min after the injection.
Visual object response test was performed to evaluate the ability of the mouse to see an object approaching from the front (frontal view) or the side (lateral view) that typically induces the animal to shift or turn the head or retreat from it. A white horizontal bar was moved frontally to the mouse head, while a small dentist’s mirror was moved laterally into the mouse’s field of view in a horizontal arc, until the stimulus was between the mouse’s eyes. The procedures were conducted bilaterally and repeated 3 times [36]. The score assigned to the movement was 1 or 0 if it was not present. The total value was calculated by adding the scores obtained in the frontal with those obtained in the lateral visual object response test (overall score: 9). Tests were measured at 10, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min after the injection.

2.3.2. Evaluation of Tactile Response

Tactile responses were verified through vibrissae, corneal and pinnae reflexes induced by the touch of a thin hypodermic needle [36]. Data are expressed as the sum of the three above-mentioned parameters (overall score = 12). Vibrissae reflex was evaluated by touching vibrissae (right and left) once for side giving a value of 1 if there was a reflex (turning of the head to the side of touch or vibrissae movement) or 0 if not present (overall score: 2). Corneal reflex was assessed by gently touching the cornea of the mouse with a thin hypodermic needle and evaluating the response: the score assigned was 1 if the mouse moved only the head, 2 if it only closed the eyelid, 3 if it closed the lid and moved the head. The procedure was conducted bilaterally (overall score: 6). Pinna reflex was assessed by touching pavilions (left and right) with a thin hypodermic needle: first the interior pavilions and then the external. This test was repeated twice for side giving a score of 1 if a reflex was present and 0 if it was not present (overall score: 4). Sensorimotor tests were measured at 10, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min after the injection for the evaluation of the tactile response.

2.3.3. Evaluation of Acoustic Response

Acoustic response measures the reflex of the mouse in response to an acoustic stimulus produced behind the animal [36]. Four acoustic stimuli of different intensity and frequency were tested: a snap of the fingers (four snaps repeated in 1.5 s), a sharp click (produced by a metal instrument; four clicks repeated in 1.5 s), an acute sound (produced by an audiometer; frequency: 5.0–5.1 kHz) and a severe sound (produced by an audiometer; frequency: 125–150 Hz). Each test was repeated 3 times. The score assigned was 1 if there was a response or 0 if it was not present, for a total score of 3 for each sound (overall score: 12). The background noise (about 40 ± 4 dB) and the sound from the instruments were measured with a digital sound level meter. Sensorimotor tests were measured at 10, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min after the injection.

2.3.4. Evaluation of Breath Rate

The experimental protocol for the detection of respiratory parameter in this study provides for monitoring of the animal awake, freely moving, with a non-invasive and minimal handling. The animal is leaving free in a cage and the respiration patterns of the mice were videotaped by a camera (B/W USB Camera day & night with varifocal lens; Ugo Basile, Italy) placed above observation’s cage. A trained operator who does not know the drug treatments performed analyses movies off-line. The analysis frame by frame allows to better evaluate the number of breath rates of the mouse evaluated through the count of about 257 ± 11 breath rates per minutes (brpm). Breath rate was measured at 15, 40, 70, 150, 130, 190, 250 and 310 min after the injection [39].

2.3.5. Evaluation of Surface and Core Temperature

To better assess the effects of the ligands on thermoregulation, we measured changes in the surface and core (rectal) temperature. Surface temperature was measured with an infrared thermometer. The core temperature was evaluated by a probe (1 mm diameter) that was gently inserted, after lubrication with liquid Vaseline, into the rectum of the rat (to about 2 cm) and left in position until the stabilization of the temperature (about 10 s) [35]. The probe was connected to a Cole Parmer digital thermometer, model 8402. Core temperature was measured at 30, 50, 85, 140, 200, 260 and 320 min after the injection.

2.3.6. Motor Activity Assessment

Stimulated and spontaneous motor activity alterations were measured performing the Accelerod test, Drag test and the Mobility time test [35,36,40].
The Accelerod test evaluate motor coordination, locomotor ability (akinesia/bradykinesia), balance ability, muscular tone and motivation to run. To this end, the animals were placed on an accelerod apparatus (Ugo Basile SRL, Gemonio [VA], Italy) that automatically increases rotation speed in a constant manner (0–60 rotations/min in 5 min). The time spent on the cylinder was measured [35,40,41]. The accelerod test was performed at 40, 65, 95, 150, 210, 270 and 330 min after the injection.
The Drag test evaluate the ability of the animal to balance the body posture with the front legs in response to an external dynamic stimulus [40,41]. The mouse was lifted by the tail, leaving the front paws on the table and dragged backward at a constant speed (20 cm/s) for a fixed distance (100 cm). The number of steps performed by each paw was recorded by two different observers. For each animal from five to seven measurements were collected [35]. The drag test was performed at 45, 70, 105, 160, 220, 280 and 340 min after the injection.
The Mobility time test evaluate spontaneous motor activity of mice [42]. The mouse is free to move on a square plastic cage (60 × 60 cm). The observer measures the total time spent moving by the animal (when the mouse walks or moves the front legs) in five minutes. Test was performed at 15, 35, 70, 125, 185, 245 and 305 min after the injection.

2.3.7. Evaluation of Skeletal Muscle Strength (Grip Strength)

Grip strength test was used to evaluate the skeletal muscle strength of mice [38,39]. The grip strength apparatus (ZP-50 N, IMADA) is made of a wire grid (5 × 5 cm) connected to an isometric force transducer (dynamometer). The test was performed by holding the mice by the tails and allowed them to grasp the grid with their forepaws. Then, mice were gently pulled backward until the release of the grid. The average force exerted by each mouse before losing the grip was recorded. The mean average force was then determined calculating the mean of three measurements for each animal. The skeletal muscle strength is expressed as gram force (gf) and processed using IMADA ZP-Recorder software. Grip strength was measured at 0, 45, 70, 105, 160, 220, 280 and 340 min after the injection.

2.4. Biochemical Studies

2.4.1. Collection of Samples

The samples were collected at the end of the present study, which provides for the repeated administration of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg, i.p.). Specifically, blood and urine samples were collected and analysed after the last injection (Figure 2; 30 mg/kg, i.p.).
Urine specimens were collected from mice individually placed inside metabolic cages (Ugo Basile SRL, Gemonio [VA], Italy) with free access to water and food [43,44,45]. To evaluate a potential urine chemistry variation, Aution Micro instrument, that allows to measure chemical-physical parameters (SCIL Animal Care Company, Treviglio, Italy), has been used. Following the urine samples collection, blood samples were collected by submandibular blood collection technique. At the end of this procedure, the animals have been sacrificed. After each blood withdrawal, the total sample volume has been split transferring it into 1-mL vial containing ethylendiaminetetracetic acid (EDTA, as preservative and anticoagulant) and analysed through the scil Vet abc Plus+ and into HEPARIN tube and analysed through Element Rc.

2.4.2. The Scil Vet abc Plus+

The scil Vet abc Plus™ is a simple (SCIL Animal Care Company, Treviglio, Italy) haematology analyser with a micropipette aspirator that needs a sample of 10 μL (containing EDTA as anticoagulant preservative) to produce a differential and complete blood cell count: erythrocytes, thrombocytes, leukocytes, haemoglobin and all erythrocyte-indices. 4-Part Differential: Granulocyte, Monocyte, Lymphocyte, Eosinophil. blood count [46]. Sample analysis provides for the quantifying of the following parameters: White Blood Cells (WBC), Lymphocytes (LYM), Monocytes (MON), Granulocytes (GRA), Eosinophils (EOS), Red Blood Cells (RBC), Haemoglobin (HGB), Haematocrit test (HCT), Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), Red cell Distribution Width (RDW), Platelets (PLT), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV). The measurement is started by pushing one button and results are automatically transferred to the practice software program. The operator-friendly reagent pack concept renders daily maintenance procedures unnecessary. The proven impedance technology delivers reliable results in both healthy and sick animals.

2.4.3. Element RC

The Element RC is an absorption spectroscopy clinical chemistry analyser that ensures high accuracy. The clinical chemistry analyser is feature by a rotor-based chemistry (Comprehensive rotor) or electrolyte (Electrolyte rotor) solution for a superior diagnostic capability. Within 12 min you receive results of 15 parameters. As regard to Comprehensive parameters these include Albumin (ALB), Total Protein (TP), Globulin (GLOB), Albumin/Globulin Ratio (A/G), Total Bilirubin (TB), Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT), Alanine Aminotransferase Level (ALT), Alcaline Phosphatase Level (ALP), Amylase (AMY), Creatinine (Crea), Triglycerides (TG), Glucose (GLU), Calcium (Ca), Phosphate (PHOS), Blood Urean Nitrogen/Creatinine (BUN/Crea) and Blood Urean Nitrogen (BUN). On the other hand, Electrolyte parameters include total CO2 (tCO2), Calcium (Ca), Phosphates (PHOS), Magnesium (Mg), Potassium (K+), Sodium (Na+) and Chlorine (Cl-). The Element RC requires only 100 µL lithium heparin sample of plasma for a diagnostic profile. The Element RC supports a bidirectional data transmission to the practice management software. Pre-installed analyser specific reference ranges and results can be transmitted directly into your practice management software.

2.4.4. Aution Micro

The Aution Micro is an analyser for the chemical-physical analysis of urine and allows to evaluate up to 10 chemical-physical parameters: Glucose (GLU), Protein (PRO), Bilirubin (BIL), Urobilinogen (URO), Ph, Specific Gravity (S.G.), Blood (BLD), Ketones (KET), Nitrates (NIT) and Leucocytes (LEU). The Aution Micro analyser provides a semi-quantitative evaluation of the proteinuria/creatinuria PU/CU ratio without any sample preparation step (dilution/centrifugation). In fact, urine analysis is performed by using reactive strips made for specific diagnostic needs (Aution Sticks 9UB, Aution Sticks 10EA, Aution Sticks 10PA and Aution Sticks Microalbuminuria/creatinuria).

2.5. Histological Studies

2.5.1. Collection of Tissue Samples

The samples of heart, spleen, liver and kidney of the two groups of animals (vehicle-treated and MTTA-treated) were collected. The organs of MTTA- and vehicle-treated animals were immediately removed, weighed and placed in 10% buffered formalin for 48 h, then embedded in paraffin. Paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were sectioned at 5 μm, and then haematoxylin and eosin stain were performed.

2.5.2. Histological Procedure

For histological investigations, the sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and then observed under optical microscope (Nikon Eclipse E90i; Nikon, Roma, Italy).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

In sensorimotor response experiments, data are expressed in arbitrary units (visual objects response, acoustic response, vibrissae, corneal and pinnae reflex) and percentage of baseline (visual placing response, breath rate, mobility time, drag, accelerod tests and grip strength). Core temperature values were expressed as the difference between control temperature (before injection) and temperature following drug administration (Δ °C) for each substance and presented in maximal possible effect:
EMax% = [(test T° − ontrol T°)/(cut off T° − control T°)] × 100
All data are shown as mean ± SEM of 8 independent experimental replications. Statistical analysis of the effects of each compound at different concentrations over time was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test for multiple comparisons. In the biochemical study, the statistical analysis of the MTTA (30 mg/kg) effects was performed using Student’s t-test used to compare vehicle and treated. For all tests, a value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software for Windows (La Jolla, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Behavioural Studies

3.1.1. Evaluation of the Sensorial Response

Visual placing, visual object, acoustic and overall tactile response did not change in vehicle-treated mice (Figure 3), and the effect was similar to that observed in naïve untreated animals (data not shown).
Visual Placing Test. Systemic administration of MTTA (0.1–10 and 30 mg/kg; i.p.) dose-dependently reduced the visual placing response in mice (Figure 3, panel A). The highest dose (30 mg/kg) induced deep and prolonged inhibition of visual placing, while intermediate doses (1 and 10 mg/kg) induced transient inhibition up to ~50% and 60%, respectively (significant effect of treatment (F4,280 = 240.8, p < 0.0001), time (F7,280 = 47.61, p < 0.0001) and time × treatment interaction (F28,280 = 8.759, p < 0.0001).
Visual Object Test. MTTA at the highest dose tested (30 mg/kg, i.p.), reduced Visual object response during the first hour of experiment ~18% compared to basal values, while the 10 mg/kg dose induced a mild reduction of ~12% only during the first 5 min (Figure 3, panel B; significant effect of treatment (F4,280 = 10.55, p < 0.0001), time (F7,280 = 5.325, p < 0.0001); significant effect of treatment (F4,280 = 10.55, p < 0.0001).
Overall Tactile Reflex Test. All MTTA doses (0.1, 1, 10 and 30 mg/kg i.p. Figure 3, panel C) did not induce a significant effect on overall tactile reflex test.
Start Reflex Test. Only at the highest dose (30 mg/kg, i.p.), MTTA slightly decreased acoustic response ~11% at 60 min (Figure 3, panel D, significant effect of treatment (F4,280 = 8.453, p < 0.0001), time (F7,280 = 1.824, p = 0.0826) and time x treatment interaction (F28,280 = 1.196, p = 0.2333).

3.1.2. Evaluation of the Physiological Parameters

Breath rate, core and surface temperature did not change in vehicle-treated mice over the 5 h observation (Figure 4), and the effect was similar to that observed in naïve untreated animals (data not shown).
Core Temperature. Core temperature immediately dropped ~4 °C compared to basal after MTTA (30 mg/kg, i.p.) administration. The thermic response gradually returns to basal values from 50 min (Figure 4, panel B; significant effect of treatment (F4,245 = 5.874, p = 0.0002), time (F6,245 = 1.660, p = 0.1315) and time x treatment interaction (F24,245 = 3.250, p < 0.0001). Other doses did not provoke effects on core temperature.
Surface Temperature. 30 mg/kg (i.p.) of MTTA slightly reduced surface temperature ~2 °C only at 5 min of experiment (Figure 4, panel C; effect of treatment (F4,245 = 1.819, p = 0.1258), time (F6,245 = 0.5575, p = 0.7639) and time x treatment interaction (F24,245 = 1.020, p = 0.4404). Other doses did not provoke effects on core temperature.

3.1.3. Evaluation of the Motor Response

Time on rod, number of steps and grip strength remained unchanged in vehicle-treated mice over the 5 h observation (Figure 5, panels A, B and D), and effect was similar to that observed in naïve untreated animals (data not shown).
Mobility time decreased in vehicle-treated mice over the 5 h of experiment (Figure 5, panel C) as with untreated animals (data not shown).
Accelerod Test. Systemic administration of MTTA (0.1–10 and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently and long-lastingly increased the stimulated motor activity in mice, which was monitored by accelerod test. In particular, after 1, 10 and 30 mg/kg administration, the time on rod increased to ~20%, ~30% and ~40% with respect to basal (Figure 5, panel A, significant effect of treatment (F4,280 = 34.93, p < 0.0001), time (F7,280 = 5.301, p < 0.0001) and time × treatment interaction (F28,280 = 1.833, p = 0.0078).
Drag Test. Systemic administration of MTTA induced significant number of steps changes at 0.1, 10 and 30 mg/kg (Figure 5, panel B, significant effect of treatment (F4,280 = 15.68, p < 0.0001), time (F7,280 = 20.44, p < 0.0001) and time x treatment interaction (F28,280 = 5.036, p < 0.0001). MTTA at 0.1 mg/kg slightly and constantly increased the number of steps up to the end of the experiment. Administration of 10 mg/kg MTTA slightly increased the number of steps only during the last 2 h of observation period. Finally, the highest dose of MTTA (30 mg/kg, i.p.) induced a biphasic effect, decreasing the number of steps during the first 105 min and increased it during last hours.
Mobility Time Test. The highest dose (30 mg/kg, i.p.) of MTTA induced a biphasic effect on spontaneous motor activity, which initially is rapidly decreased ~40% with respect to basal in the first 15 min and then increased ~40% during the last 2 h (Figure 5, panel C, significant effect of treatment (F4,278 = 1.978, p = 0.0981), time (F7,278 = 5.510, p < 0.0001). Other doses did not induce a different effect from basal.
Grip strength. The dose–response curve did not show any significant effect of skeletal muscle strength after systemic administration of MTTA at all doses (0.1–10 and 30 mg/kg, i.p.; Figure 5, panel C).

3.2. Biochemical Studies

3.2.1. Complete Blood Count

Vehicle-treated mice did not show blood count parameters variation compared to naïve untreated control mice (data not shown). Systemic administration of MTTA induced significant variation in blood count parameters. In fact, Table 1 showed significant decrease following t-test analysis: WBC (t = 17.16, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), LYM# (t = 9.649, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), LYM% (t = 16.78, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), RBC (t = 15.37, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), HGB (t = 25.73, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), HCT (t = 15.90, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), MCV (t = 51.90, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), MCH (t = 37.91, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), MCHC (t = 26.66, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), RDW (t = 10.37, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), MPV (t = 22.42, Df = 14, p < 0.0001). On the contrary, MON% (t = 2.164, Df = 14, p = 0.0482) and GRA% (t = 4.508, Df = 14, p = 0.005) increased.

3.2.2. Element RC

MTTA induced changes in electrolyte (Table 2) and comprehensive (Table 3) parameters in mice, whereas parameters of vehicle-treated mice did not change compared to naïve mice (data not shown).

3.2.3. Urine Analysis

Urine parameters did not change in vehicle-treated mice compared to untreated mice (data not shown). Systemic administration of MTTA (Table 4) induced an increase in following parameters: PRO ( t = 5.036, Df = 14, p = 0.0002), URO (t = 16.10, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), pH (t = 2.579, Df = 14, p = 0.0218), BLD (t = 8.944, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), KET (t = 5.837, Df = 14, p < 0.0001) and LEU (t = 10.19, Df = 14, p < 0.0001).

3.3. Histological Results

3.3.1. Kidney

Glomeruli showed fragmentation, and few atrophied elements were observed. Perihilar segmental sclerosis and collapsing lesion relating to hypertrophied elements were evident and diffuse in the same glomeruli. There were small adhesions to the Bowman’s capsule. Patchy mild interstitial leucocytes infiltration involving the cortex was described (Figure 6, panels A and B). Pathological findings were absent in the vehicle-treated mice (not shown).

3.3.2. Heart

In the heart samples, the histologic changes are an intense hyper-eosinophilia of the hypercontracted myocardial cells with rhexis of the myofibrillar apparatus into cross-fibre, anomalous and irregular or pathological bands (contraction bands necrosis). Normal cells around hypercontracted ones assume a wavy appearance. The spaces between bands are filled by mitochondria. No evidence of platelet aggregation or other vessel changes or of interstitial or sarcolemmal alterations exists (Figure 6, panels C and D). No pathological findings were present in the vehicle-treated mice (not shown).

3.3.3. Spleen

The analysis of spleen tissue does not show pathological findings either in treated or vehicle-treated mice (not shown).

3.3.4. Liver

Liver samples of treated mice show moderate initial cytoplasmic hyper-eosinophilia, foci of necrosis, sinusoidal dilatation with presence of acidophilic body and ballooning degeneration of hepatocytes (Figure 6, panels E and F). In periportal areas in preserved hepatocytes were observed microvescicular fatty changes. In the vehicle-treated mice were not present histological alterations (not shown).

4. Discussion

The aim of this study is to evaluate the profile of amphetamine derivate MTTA, a new psychoactive substance (NPS) belonging to the synthetic cathinones (SCs) group [3]. Structurally, SCs are β-keto amphetamines derivates and elicit their action on monoamines transporters [47,48,49,50]. The tested substance, MTTA, is a cathinones-like compound, but it presents a γ-amino ketonic structure [15,19]. Its structure, different from that of β-keto-derivates, could explain why MTTA did not present the typical profile when compared to other already studied synthetic stimulants [51,52,53]. For the first time, our study shows that repeated MTTA administration induces behavioural, biochemical and histological changes (in heart, liver and kidney) in mice.

4.1. Behavioural Changes

Visual placing test demonstrated a significant decrement after 1, 10 and 30 mg/kg (Figure 3, panel A) of MTTA administration, while visual object test showed a transient decrease after 30 mg/kg administration (Figure 3, panel B). Acoustic reflexes were slightly reduced at 30 mg/kg (Figure 3, panel D). As regards physiological responses, MTTA transiently reduced breath rate at the highest dose (30 mg/kg, Figure 4, panel A). MTTA at 30 mg/kg induced core and surface temperature decrease during the first 50 min (Figure 4, panels B and C). Motor changes were reported after MTTA administration (Figure 5) as follows: Time on rod was dose-dependently increased (panel A), while biphasic effect was shown at the highest dose (30 mg/kg) in drag test (panel B) and mobility time test (panel C). Finally, performing grip strength test, any change in the skeletal muscle strength of mice was not observed after MTTA administration (Figure 5, panel D).
The deepest MTTA effect, observed in visual placing test, was likely caused by norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibition. Such inhibition could lead to visual placing responses decrease, as previously demonstrated by De-Giorgio and colleagues’ behavioural study on amphetamine-derivate methiopropamine (MPA) [52]. In particular, the norepinephrine (NE) release could change optokinetic reflex (OKR) via β-receptor and vestibulo ocular reflex (VOR) via α2-receptors [54] stimulation. The vestibular system is the main circuit involved in visual placing test, ruling visual functions, postural equilibrium and complex voluntary motions [55]. Indeed, together with visual cues, motor and postural circuits could be involved in response to proprioceptive information [56]. The same hypothesis was generated regarding the above-mentioned MPA study [52]. Long lasting effects on visual placing could also be due to MTTA metabolites’ action on monoaminergic transporters [19].
Despite MTTA’s likely noradrenergic profile, even the hypothesis of serotoninergic system involvement should be considered. MTTA could also increase serotoninergic tone, inhibiting serotonin transporter (SERT). Indeed, activation of 5HT2 receptor in cortico-visual circuits could explain the visual object responses, probably due to a “disperceptive state” of animals [42]. Likewise, the acoustic reflex decrement at the highest dose tested (30 mg/kg) could be due to serotonin action on the dorsal nucleus accumbens, in which 5HT2 binding could lead to auditory suppression [57]. This evidence is typical of entactogenic substances, such as MDMA [18], that, at the highest dose tested (20 mg/kg), induced the same effect on mice [42]. Moreover, even mephedrone has been reported to induce visual and auditory hallucination in humans [58].
Further confirmation of the involvement of the serotoninergic system is given by seizures noted in tested mice during the first hour of observation (12.5% of mice at 10 mg/kg and 37.5% of mice at 30 mg/kg; data not shown). Breath rate decrease co-appears in mice in the same period of convulsive events. Seizures, deriving from amygdala stimulation [59], could provoke a reduction in spontaneous breathing [60]. During a convulsion, a specific amygdala region could be stimulated [61]. This presents different effector sites downstream, such as the breathing central pattern generator (bCPG), that resides in the pre-Bötzinger complex (pre-BötC), which mediates respiratory rhythm [62,63]. MTTA could also regulate body temperature, modulating monoamines tone in the preoptic-anterior hypothalamic area, which is involved in thermoregulation [64,65]. Hypothermia could be again induced through binding of NE to α1-receptor [66]. Moreover, within the same brain region, even DA release, deriving from dopaminergic transporter (DAT) inhibition, could provoke the reduction in temperature, as previous studies on rats have shown [67]. The MTTA-induced effect on temperature was similar but less long-lasting when compared to that of mephedrone in rats in the same experimental condition [68]. In addition, MPA in mice or other amphetamine derivates such as methamphetamine (core temperature) [52,69] and MDPV in rats (surface temperature) [70] induced hypothermic response. DAT inhibition could also explain the dose-dependent locomotor activity increase (observed in accelerod test, Figure 5, panel A), which is consistent with a previous preclinical in vivo study that showed these effects in rodents after administration of different cathinones, including mephedrone and buphedrone [52,71,72,73,74]. This evidence suggests that DAT inhibition could lead to a dopaminergic tone increment within nucleus accumbens [75,76,77,78]. The same evidence was reported after buphedrone administration, resulting in increased D1 receptor expression in dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens [72]. Nevertheless, two other motor tests (drag and mobility time test, Figure 5, panel B and C) showed initial inhibition of motor activity at the highest dose tested (30 mg/kg). Once again, an appearance of seizures may explain the effect. Indeed, malaise of mice may explain the initial decrease in motor activity since motor facilitation resumed after the disappearance of convulsions. Another explanation of biphasic effect could be based on MTTA metabolism [19], which could produce a metabolite that mostly acts on dopamine, promoting motor facilitation. Moreover, due to the absence of effect induced on skeletal muscle strength, it could be excluded that the initial motor decrease was related to an impairment of skeletal muscle activity.
It is worth noting that mephedrone, which is similar to mephtetramine in its chemical structure, causes efflux of dopamine and serotonin via acting on monoamines’ transporters, with similar inhibitory efficacy and potency [79]. Thus, based on the present results, a similar pharmacological profile should be suggested for MTTA. However, further studies may be required to deepen insight regarding the mechanisms underlying its atypical effects.

4.2. Biochemical and Histological Changes

Alterations in the biochemical profile of blood and urine show for the first time the potential toxicity of repeated administration of MTTA in mice. In fact, many authors have proven that investigating mouse models can be useful to investigate blood disorders in humans [80]. Concerning blood parameters, some of these could have changed due to haemorrhage [81,82] and stress status [82] provoked by submandibular withdrawal or heparinised sampling [83]. Specifically, the latter evidence was previously related to electrolyte levels variation in preclinical studies, such as Ca [82,84] or Mg [82,85,86]. Despite this, the same withdrawal and sampling technique was used for both basal sample (vehicle-treated animals) and treated sample (MTTA-treated animals), and the first one reported values similar to those of naïve untreated mice (data not shown). Therefore, we assume that blood parameters variation could be closely related to drug administration. In particular, through the complete blood count (Table 1), the mice treated with MTTA showed variations in parameters in respect to vehicle-treated animals. In fact, there was an anaemia and leukopenia with monocytosis and granulocytosis. In particular, we demonstrated a decrease in WBC, LYM, RBC, HGB, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW and MPV, while there was an increase in MON and GRA. The simultaneous decrease in lymphocytes together with a relative increase in the monocytes and granulocytes is compatible with an immediate inflammatory response following administration of last MTTA dose (30 mg/kg). On the other hand, electrolytes parameters changes showed a decrease in Ca, Phos, Mg and Na, whereas tCO2 increased (Table 2). The increase in tCO2 value could indicate hypoventilation, confirmed by the decrease in breath rate (Figure 4, panel A) following MTTA administration. Other blood parameters’ analysis indicates variation in ALB, TP, A/G, TB, GGT, ALT, ALP, AMY, Crea, TG, GLU and Ca2+(Table 3). In line with histological analysis, the variation in ALT, ALP, GGT, TB and ALB could lead to a liver disease [87,88]. The lower ALB than basal value could also explain the TP and A/G decrease. Pancreatic disorder could be suggested by the increase in TC and GLU [89,90]. The reduction in AMY could be related to these changes, being an index of metabolic syndrome and diabetes [91].
Finally, urine samples showed an increase in PRO, URO, PH, BLD, KET and LEU (Table 4). Bilirubin and urobilinogen in urine could confirm the possibility of liver damage [92]. In particular, the intestinal metabolism of bilirubin converts this to urobilinogen, which is excreted with urine [93]. In addition, the pH change could indicate a metabolic alteration, leading to an acid–base imbalance that could confirm the hypoventilation described. Therefore, the urinary profile indicates an important renal failure, with the impossibility of acid–base recovery established by two possible mechanisms: decreased breath rate with increased blood carbon dioxide and/or direct metabolic reaction to metabolization of the drug. Histological analyses show evident renal impairment at the glomerular level and Bowman’s capsule and mild interstitial leucocytes infiltration involving the renal cortex. This kidney damage could be the cause of high protein urine levels [94]. Moreover, the presence of ketones in urine is an index of high glucose blood levels [95], confirming possible metabolic damage already reported. Possible damage in these organs could also explain the very high level of leucocytes, which is an index of inflammation [96]. Cardiac alterations characterised by intense hyper-eosinophilia of the hypercontracted myocardial cells with rhexis of the myofibrillar apparatus into cross-fibre, anomalous and irregular or pathological bands (contraction bands necrosis) indicate a state of stress and suffering at the level of this organ and further suggest the dangers of repeated intake of MTTA.

5. Conclusions

The present study pointed out for the first time that atypical cathinone MTTA induces sensorial (inhibition of visual and acoustic reflexes) and transient physiological parameter (decrease in breath rate and body temperature) changes in mice. Regarding motor activity, both a dose-dependent increase (accelerod test) and biphasic effect (drag and mobility time test) have been shown. The structural profile different from that of the most common cathinones [12,49,51,70,97,98] could suggest that MTTA has been synthetised with the aim to induce different effects from previous drugs, also in line with the mild stimulant profile highlighted by the present results. Thus, MTTA users showed different effects [26,99,100] compared to those expected, and this may explain why the substance was not used for a long time but was available in the market only from 2013 to 2015 [22]. Despite this mild cathinone-like effect, MTTA induced important changes in both blood and urine profile, possibly consistent with trigger of inflammatory responses and/or metabolic alterations, emphasizing its potential toxicity, strengthened by the observed histological changes in heart and kidney samples. Therefore, MTTA, even if perceived as not very active and relatively safe by consumers, hides a potential toxicity that must be further considered, especially when MTTA is taken together with other and more powerful NPSs.

Author Contributions

M.M., G.C. and M.T. contributed to the conception and design of the study. R.A., S.B., M.T., G.C., B.M. and M.B. performed in vivo experiments. R.M.G., G.C., R.A., S.B., M.T., M.B., T.B. and B.M. performed biochemical studies. M.N. and R.M.G. performed histological analysis. G.C., M.T., S.O., S.M. and S.S.-R. performed statistical analysis. M.M., G.C. and M.T. wrote the manuscript. G.C., M.T., S.S.-R., R.M.G. and M.M. edited sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Drug Policies Department, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Italy (project: ‘Effects of NPS: development of a multicentric research for the information enhancement of the Early Warning System’ to M.M.) and by local funds from the University of Ferrara (FAR 2020 and FAR 2021 to M.M.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ministry of Health (protocol code 335/2016-PR 1/4/2016). All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in the studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice with which the studies were conducted. Project activated in collaboration with the Presidency of the Council of Ministers—DPA Anti-Drug Policies (Italy).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the first (Giorgia Corli) and corresponding author (Matteo Marti) for researchers of academic institutes who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

2C-B2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromophenethylamine
4-MCCMephedrone
A/GAlbumin/Globulin Ratio
ALBAlbumin
ALPAlkaline Phosphatase Level
ALTAlanine Aminotransferase Level
AMYAmylase
BILBilirubin
BLD Blood
BUNBlood Urea Nitrogen
CreaCreatinine
EOSEosinophils
GGTGamma Glutamyltransferase
GLOBGlobulin
GLUGlucose
GRA Granulocytes
HCTHaematocrit test
HGB Haemoglobin
KET Ketones
LEU Leucocytes
LSD lysergic acid diethylamide
LYMLymphocytes
MABPBuphedrone
MCHMean Corpuscular Haemoglobin
MCHCMean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration
MCVMean Corpuscular Volume
MDMA 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine
MDPV3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone
MONMonocytes
MPVMean Platelet Volume
MTTAMephtetramine
NIT Nitrates
NPSNovel Psychoactive Substances
PHOSPhosphates
PLTPlatelets
PROProteins
RBC Red Blood Cells
RDWRed Cell Distribution Width
S.G. Specific Gravity
SCs Synthetic Cathinones
TBTotal Bilirubin
tCO2Total CO2
TGTriglycerides
TPTotal Protein
URO Urobilinogen
WBCWhite Blood Cells

References

  1. Griffiths, P.; Evans-Brown, M.; Sedefov, R. Getting up to speed with the public health and regulatory challenges posed by new psychoactive substances in the information age. Addiction 2013, 108, 1700–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Current NPS Threats, UNODC Laboratory and Scientific Service Portals. 2020. Available online: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/scientists/current-nps-threats.html (accessed on 5 December 2022).
  3. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). European Drug Report 2020: Trends and Developments; Publications Office of the European Union: Lisbon, Portugal, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Impact of COVID-19 on Drug Markets, Use, Harms and Drug Services in the Community and Prisons: Results from an EMCDDA Trendspotter Study; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. Miliano, C.; Serpelloni, G.; Rimondo, C.; Mereu, M.; Marti, M.; De Luca, M.A. Neuropharmacology of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS): Focus on the Rewarding and Reinforcing Properties of Cannabimimetics and Amphetamine-Like Stimulants. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hondebrink, L.; Zwartsen, A.; Westerink, R.H.S. Effect fingerprinting of new psychoactive substances (NPS): What can we learn from in vitro data? Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 182, 193–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Mello-Sampayo, C.; Vaz, A.R.; Henriques, S.C.; Fernandes, A.; Paradinha, F.; Florindo, P.; Faria, P.; Moreira, R.; Brites, D.; Lopes, A. Designer Cathinones N-Ethylhexedrone and Buphedrone Show Different In Vitro Neurotoxicity and Mice Behaviour Impairment. Neurotox. Res. 2021, 39, 392–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Measham, F.; Moore, K.; Newcombe, R.; Welch, Z. Tweaking, bombing, dabbing and stockpiling: The emergence of mephedrone and the perversity of prohibition. Drugs Alcohol Today 2021, 10, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Carhart-Harris, R.L.; King, L.A.; Nutt, D.J. A web-based survey on mephedrone. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011, 118, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Corkery, J.; Guirguis, A.; Papanti, D.; Orsolini, L.; Schifano, F. Synthetic cathinones—Prevalence and motivations for use. In Synthetic Cathinones: Novel Addiction and Stimulatory Psychoactive Substances; Current Topics in Neurotoxicity; Zawilska, J., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; Volume 12, pp. 153–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Soares, J.; Costa, V.M.; Bastos, M.L.; Carvalho, F.; Capela, J.P. An updated review on synthetic cathinones. Arch. Toxicol. 2021, 95, 2895–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baumann, M.H.; Partilla, J.S.; Lehner, K.R.; Thorndike, E.B.; Hoffman, A.F.; Holy, M.; Rothman, R.B.; Goldberg, S.R.; Lupica, C.R.; Sitte, H.H.; et al. Powerful cocaine-like actions of 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), a principal constituent of psychoactive ‘bath salts’ products. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Early Warning Advisory on NPS, UNODC Laboratory and Scientific Service Portals. 2014. Available online: https://www.unodc.org/LSS/Page/NPS/Resources (accessed on 5 December 2022).
  14. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. The Challenge of Synthetic Drugs in East and South-East Asia and Oceania. Trends and Patterns of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants and New Psychoactive Substances, UNODC Laboratory and Scientific Service Portals. 2015. Available online: https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/Trends_and_Patterns_of_ATS_and_NPS_2017.pdf (accessed on 5 December 2022).
  15. Dolengevich-Segal, H.; Rodríguez-Salgado, B.; Gómez-Arnau, J.; Sánchez-Mateos, D. An approach to the new psychoactive drugs phenomenon. Salud Ment. 2017, 40, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Simmler, L.D.; Buser, T.A.; Donzelli, M.; Schramm, Y.; Dieu, L.H.; Huwyler, J.; Chaboz, S.; Hoener, M.C.; Liechti, M.E. Pharmacological characterization of designer cathinones in vitro. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 168, 458–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Simmler, L.D.; Rickli, A.; Hoener, M.C.; Liechti, M.E. Monoamine transporter and receptor interaction profiles of a new series of designer cathinones. Neuropharmacology 2014, 79, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liechti, M. Novel psychoactive substances (designer drugs): Overview and pharmacology of modulators of monoamine signaling. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2015, 145, w14043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Odoardi, S.; Mestria, S.; Biosa, G.; Arfè, R.; Tirri, M.; Marti, M.; Strano Rossi, S. Metabolism study and toxicological determination of mephtetramine in biological samples by liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry. Drug Test. Anal. 2021, 13, 1516–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Abuse (EMCDDA)—Europol. Annual Report on the Implementation of Council Decision; 2005/387/JHA; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxemoburg, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  21. Strano Rossi, S.; Odoardi, S.; Gregori, A.; Peluso, G.; Ripani, L.; Ortar, G.; Serpelloni, G.; Romolo, F.S. An analytical approach to the forensic identification of different classes of new psychoactive substances (NPSs) in seized materials. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 28, 1904–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Odoardi, S.; Romolo, F.S.; Strano-Rossi, S. A snapshot on NPS in Italy: Distribution of drugs in seized materials analysed in an Italian forensic laboratory in the period 2013–2015. Forensic Sci. Int. 2016, 265, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)–Europol. European Drug Report 2017: Trends and Developments; European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction: Lisbon, Portugal, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fabregat-Safont, D.; Carbón, X.; Ventura, M.; Fornís, I.; Hernández, F.; Ibáñez, M. Characterization of a recently detected halogenated aminorex derivative: Para-fluoro-4-methylaminorex (4′F-4-MAR). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Bluelight. Available online: https://bluelight.org/xf/threads/mtta-and-meop-waste-or-useful-if-combinated-with-something.777781/#post-13369987 (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  26. Bluelight. Available online: https://bluelight.org/xf/threads/new-and-less-new-rcs-alphabet-soup.715035/page-53#post-13296946 (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  27. Land der Träume. Available online: https://www.land-der-traeume.de/forum.php?t=35537 (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  28. Tuv, S.S.; Krabseth, H.; Karinen, R.; Olsen, K.M.; Øiestad, E.L.; Vindenes, V. Prevalence of synthetic cannabinoids in blood samples from Norwegian drivers suspected of impaired driving during a seven weeks period. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2014, 62, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rajotte, J.W.; Palmentier, J.F.P.; Wallage, H.R. Drug recognition evaluation and chemical confirmation of a 25C-NBOMe-impaired driver. J. Forensic Sci. 2017, 62, 1410–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Busardo, F.P.; Pichini, S.; Pellegrini, M.; Montana, A.; Lo Faro, A.F.; Zaami, S.; Graziano, S. Correlation between blood and oral fluid psychoactive drug concentrations and cognitive impairment in driving under the influence of drugs. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2017, 16, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ji Kwon, N.; Han, E. A review of drug abuse in recently reported cases of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) in Asia, USA, and Europe. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019, 302, 109854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bilel, S.; Giorgetti, A.; Tirri, M.; Arfè, R.; Cristofori, V.; Marchetti, B.; Corli, G.; Caruso, L.; Zauli, G.; Giorgetti, R.; et al. Sensorimotor Alterations Induced by Novel Fentanyl Analogs in Mice: Possible Impact on Human Driving Performances. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2022. Epub ahead of printing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tirri, M.; Bilel, S.; Arfè, R.; Corli, G.; Marchetti, B.; Bernardi, T.; Boccuto, F.; Serpelloni, G.; Botrè, F.; De-Giorgio, F.; et al. Effect of -NBOMe Compounds on Sensorimotor, Motor, and Prepulse Inhibition Responses in Mice in Comparison With the 2C Analogs and Lysergic Acid Diethylamide: From Preclinical Evidence to Forensic Implication in Driving Under the Influence of Drugs. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 875722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Reagan-Shaw, S.; Nihal, M.; Ahmad, N. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 659–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Vigolo, A.; Ossato, A.; Trapella, C.; Vincenzi, F.; Rimondo, C.; Seri, C.; Varani, K.; Serpelloni, G.; Marti, M. Novel halogenated derivates of JWH-018: Behavioral and binding studies in mice. Neuropharmacology 2015, 95, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ossato, A.; Vigolo, A.; Trapella, C.; Seri, C.; Rimondo, C.; Serpelloni, G.; Marti, M. JWH-018 impairs sensorimotor functions in mice. Neuroscience 2015, 300, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ossato, A.; Bilel, S.; Gregori, A.; Talarico, A.; Trapella, C.; Gaudio, R.M.; De Giorgio, F.; Tagliaro, F.; Neri, M.; Fattore, L.; et al. Neurological, sensorimotor and cardiorespiratory alterations induced by methoxetamine, ketamine and phencyclidine in mice. Neuropharmacology 2018, 141, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bilel, S.; Azevedo, N.; Arfè, R.; Tirri, M.; Gregori, A.; Serpelloni, G.; De-Giorgio, F.; Frisoni, P.; Neri, M.; Calò, G.; et al. In vitro and in vivo pharmacological characterization of the synthetic opioid MT-45. Neuropharmacology 2020, 171, 108110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arfè, R.; Bilel, S.; Tirri, M.; Frisoni, P.; Serpelloni, G.; Neri, M.; Boccuto, F.; Bernardi, T.; Foti, F.; De-Giorgio, F.; et al. Comparison of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) and the "date rape" drug GHB: Behavioral toxicology in the mouse model. Psychopharmacology 2021, 238, 2275–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bilel, S.; Azevedo Neto, J.; Arfè, R.; Tirri, M.; Gaudio, R.M.; Fantinati, A.; Bernardi, T.; Boccuto, F.; Marchetti, B.; Corli, G.; et al. In vitro and in vivo pharmaco-dynamic study of the novel fentanyl derivatives: Acrylfentanyl, Ocfentanyl and Furanylfentanyl. Neuropharmacology 2022, 209, 109020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Corli, G.; Tirri, M.; Arfè, R.; Bilel, S.; Marchetti, B.; Gregori, A.; Di Rosa, F.; Vincenzi, F.; De-Giorgio, F.; Borea, P.A.; et al. Behavioral and binding studies on the quinolinyl ester indoles 5F-PB22 (5F-QUPIC) and BB-22 (QUCHIC) in the mouse model. Emerg. Trends Drugs Addict. Health 2022, 2, 100039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Marti, M.; Neri, M.; Bilel, S.; Di Paolo, M.; La Russa, R.; Ossato, A.; Turillazzi, E. MDMA alone affects sensorimotor and prepulse inhibition responses in mice and rats: Tips in the debate on potential MDMA unsafety in human activity. Forensic Toxicol. 2019, 37, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chieffi, C.; Camuto, C.; De-Giorgio, F.; de la Torre, X.; Diamanti, F.; Mazzarino, M.; Trapella, C.; Marti, M.; Botrè, F. Metabolic profile of the synthetic drug 4,4′-dimethylaminorex in urine by LC–MS-based techniques: Selection of the most suitable markers of its intake. Forensic Toxicol. 2021, 39, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Camuto, C.; Pellegrini, S.; De-Giorgio, F.; de la Torre, X.; Marti, M.; Mazzarino, M.; Botrè, F. Urinary excretion profile of methiopropamine in mice following intraperitoneal administration: A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry investigation. Drug Test. Anal. 2021, 13, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mestria, S.; Odoardi, S.; Federici, S.; Bilel, S.; Tirri, M.; Marti, M.; Strano Rossi, S. Metabolism Study of N-Methyl 2-Aminoindane (NM2AI) and Determination of Metabolites in Biological Samples by LC-HRMS. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2021, 45, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Van de Water, E.; Oosterlinck, M.; Duchateau, L.; Pille, F. Agreement of manual cell counts and automated counts of the scil Vet abc Plus(+) hematology analyzer for analysis of equine synovial fluid. Res. Vet. Sci. 2016, 106, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Banks, M.L.; Worst, T.J.; Rusyniak, D.E.; Sprague, J.E. Synthetic cathinones ("bath salts"). J. Emerg. Med. 2014, 46, 632–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Valente, M.J.; Guedes de Pinho, P.; de Lourdes Bastos, M.; Carvalho, F.; Carvalho, M. Khat and synthetic cathinones: A review. Arch. Toxicol. 2014, 88, 15–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Baumann, M.H.; Walters, H.M.; Niello, M.; Sitte, H.H. Neuropharmacology of Synthetic Cathinones. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2018, 252, 113–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Luethi, D.; Liechti, M.E. Designer drugs: Mechanism of action and adverse effects. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 1085–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Baumann, M.H.; Ayestas, M.A., Jr.; Partilla, J.S.; Sink, J.R.; Shulgin, A.T.; Daley, P.F.; Brandt, S.D.; Rothman, R.B.; Ruoho, A.E.; Cozzi, N.V. The designer methcathinone analogs, mephedrone and methylone, are substrates for monoamine transporters in brain tissue. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37, 1192–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. De-Giorgio, F.; Bilel, S.; Tirri, M.; Arfè, R.; Trapella, C.; Camuto, C.; Foti, F.; Frisoni, P.; Neri, M.; Botrè, F.; et al. Methiopropamine and its acute behavioral effects in mice: Is there a gray zone in new psychoactive substances users? Int. J. Leg. Med. 2020, 134, 1695–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tirri, M.; Frisoni, P.; Bilel, S.; Arfè, R.; Trapella, C.; Fantinati, A.; Corli, G.; Marchetti, B.; De-Giorgio, F.; Camuto, C.; et al. Worsening of the Toxic Effects of (±)Cis-4,4′-DMAR Following Its Co-Administration with (±)Trans-4,4′-DMAR: Neuro-Behavioural, Physiological, Immunohistochemical and Metabolic Studies in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wakita, R.; Tanabe, S.; Tabei, K.; Funaki, A.; Inoshita, T.; Hirano, T. Differential regulations of vestibulo-ocular reflex and optokinetic response by β- and α2-adrenergic receptors in the cerebellar flocculus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Cullen, K.E. The vestibular system: Multimodal integration and encoding of self-motion for motor control. Trends Neurosci. 2012, 35, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Etienne, A.S.; Maurer, R.; Séguinot, V. Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks. J. Exp. Biol. 1996, 199, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Felix, R.A., II; Elde, C.J.; Nevue, A.A.; Portfors, C.V. Serotonin modulates response properties of neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the mouse. Hear. Res. 2017, 344, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Winstock, A.; Mitcheson, L.; Ramsey, J.; Davies, S.; Puchnarewicz, M.; Marsden, J. Mephedrone: Use, subjective effects and health risks. Addiction 2011, 106, 1991–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Blumenfeld, H.; Rivera, M.; Vasquez, J.G.; Shah, A.; Ismail, D.; Enev, M.; Zaveri, H.P. Neocortical and thalamic spread of amygdala kindled seizures. Epilepsia 2007, 48, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dlouhy, B.J.; Gehlbach, B.K.; Kreple, C.J.; Kawasaki, H.; Oya, H.; Buzza, C.; Granner, M.A.; Welsh, M.J.; Howard, M.A.; Wemmie, J.A.; et al. Breathing Inhibited When Seizures Spread to the Amygdala and upon Amygdala Stimulation. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 10281–10289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rhone, A.E.; Kovach, C.K.; Harmata, G.I.; Sullivan, A.W.; Tranel, D.; Ciliberto, M.A.; Howard, M.A.; Richerson, G.B.; Steinschneider, M.; Wemmie, J.A.; et al. A human amygdala site that inhibits respiration and elicits apnea in pediatric epilepsy. JCI Insight 2020, 5, e134852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Feldman, J.L.; Mitchell, G.S.; Nattie, E.E. Breathing: Rhythmicity, plasticity, chemosensitivity. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2003, 26, 239–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Yang, C.F.; Kim, E.J.; Callaway, E.M.; Feldman, J.L. Monosynaptic Projections to Excitatory and Inhibitory preBötzinger Complex Neurons. Front. Neuroanat. 2020, 14, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Boulant, J.A. Hypothalamic neurons. Mechanisms of sensitivity to temperature. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 856, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nakamura, K. Central circuitries for body temperature regulation and fever. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2011, 301, R1207–R1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Mallick, B.N.; Alam, M.N. Different types of norepinephrinergic receptors are involved in preoptic area mediated independent modulation of sleep-wakefulness and body temperature. Brain Res. 1992, 591, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cox, B.; Lee, T.F. Evidence for an endogenous dopamine-mediated hypothermia in the rat. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1979, 67, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Miller, M.L.; Creehan, K.M.; Angrish, D.; Barlow, D.J.; Houseknecht, K.L.; Dickerson, T.J.; Taffe, M.A. Changes in ambient temperature differentially alter the thermoregulatory, cardiac and locomotor stimulant effects of 4-methylmethcathinone (mephedrone). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 127, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Myles, B.J.; Sabol, K.E. The effects of methamphetamine on core body temperature in the rat--part 2: An escalating regimen. Psychopharmacology 2008, 198, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Aarde, S.M.; Creehan, K.M.; Vandewater, S.A.; Dickerson, T.J.; Taffe, M.A. In vivo potency and efficacy of the novel cathinone α-pyrrolidinopentiophenone and 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone: Self-administration and locomotor stimulation in male rats. Psychopharmacology 2015, 232, 3045–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. López-Arnau, R.; Martínez-Clemente, J.; Pubill, D.; Escubedo, E.; Camarasa, J. Comparative neuropharmacology of three psychostimulant cathinone derivatives: Butylone, mephedrone and methylone. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 167, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Oh, J.H.; Hwang, J.Y.; Hong, S.I.; Ma, S.X.; Seo, J.Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, H.C.; Jang, C.G. The new designer drug buphedrone produces rewarding properties via dopamine D1 receptor activation. Addict. Biol. 2018, 23, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wojcieszak, J.; Andrzejczak, D.; Wojtas, A.; Gołembiowska, K.; Zawilska, J.B. Methcathinone and 3-Fluoromethcathinone Stimulate Spontaneous Horizontal Locomotor Activity in Mice and Elevate Extracellular Dopamine and Serotonin Levels in the Mouse Striatum. Neurotox. Res. 2019, 35, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wojcieszak, J.; Kuczyńska, K.; Zawilska, J.B. Four Synthetic Cathinones: 3-Chloromethcathinone, 4-Chloromethcathinone, 4-Fluoro-α-Pyrrolidinopentiophenone, and 4-Methoxy-α-Pyrrolidinopentiophenone Produce Changes in the Spontaneous Locomotor Activity and Motor Performance in Mice with Varied Profiles. Neurotox. Res. 2020, 38, 536–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jackson, D.M.; Andén, N.E.; Dahlström, A. A functional effect of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and in some other dopamine-rich parts of the rat brain. Psychopharmacologia 1975, 45, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ljungberg, T.; Ungerstedt, U. A rapid and simple behavioural screening method for simultaneous assessment of limbic and striatal blocking effects of neuroleptic drugs. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1985, 23, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zolkowska, D.; Jain, R.; Rothman, R.B.; Partilla, J.S.; Roth, B.L.; Setola, V.; Prisinzano, T.E.; Baumann, M.H. Evidence for the involvement of dopamine transporters in behavioral stimulant effects of modafinil. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 329, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Baumann, M.H.; Clark, R.D.; Woolverton, W.L.; Wee, S.; Blough, B.E.; Rothman, R.B. In vivo effects of amphetamine analogs reveal evidence for serotonergic inhibition of mesolimbic dopamine transmission in the rat. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011, 337, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Luethi, D.; Kolaczynska, K.E.; Docci, L.; Krähenbühl, S.; Hoener, M.C.; Liechti, M.E. Pharmacological profile of mephedrone analogs and related new psychoactive substances. Neuropharmacology 2018, 134, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Aurbach, K.; Spindler, M.; Haining, E.J.; Bender, M.; Pleines, I. Blood collection, platelet isolation and measurement of platelet count and size in mice-a practical guide. Platelets 2019, 30, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Grindem, C.B. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology, 6th ed.; Weiss, D.J., Wardrop, K.J., Eds.; Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  82. Teng, W.F.; Sun, W.M.; Shi, L.F.; Hou, D.D.; Liu, H. Effects of restraint stress on iron, zinc, calcium, and magnesium whole blood levels in mice. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2008, 121, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yip, P.M.; Chan, M.K.; Zielinski, N.; Adeli, K. Heparin interference in whole blood sodium measurements in a pediatric setting. Clin. Biochem. 2006, 39, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Liashenko, V.P.; Lukashov, S.M. Effect of stress on calcium homeostasis in muscular tissues. Fiziolohichnyi Zhurnal 2003, 49, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Joëls, M.; Velzing, E.; Nair, S.; Verkuyl, J.M.; Karst, H. Acute stress increases calcium current amplitude in rat hippocampus: Temporal changes in physiology and gene expression. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 18, 1315–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Takase, B.; Akima, T.; Uehata, A.; Ohsuzu, F.; Kurita, A. Effect of chronic stress and sleep deprivation on both flow-mediated dilation in the brachial artery and the intracellular magnesium level in humans. Clin. Cardiol. 2004, 27, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yuan, G.; Dai, S.; Yin, Z.; Lu, H.; Jia, R.; Xu, J.; Song, X.; Li, L.; Shu, Y.; Zhao, X. Toxicological assessment of combined lead and cadmium: Acute and sub-chronic toxicity study in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 65, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lala, V.; Zubair, M.; Minter, D.A. Liver Function Tests. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  89. Shemesh, E.; Zafrir, B. Hypertriglyceridemia-Related Pancreatitis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Links And Risks. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2019, 12, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Raimi, T.H.; Dele-Ojo, B.F.; Dada, S.A.; Fadare, J.O.; Ajayi, D.D.; Ajayi, E.A.; Ajayi, O.A. Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Related Parameters Predicted Metabolic Syndrome in Nigerians. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2021, 19, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Nakajima, K.; Nemoto, T.; Muneyuki, T.; Kakei, M.; Fuchigami, H.; Munakata, H. Low serum amylase in association with metabolic syndrome and diabetes: A community-based study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2011, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Fan, S.; Ban, S. Urinalysis. In Contemporary Practice in Clinical Chemistry, 4th ed.; Clarke, W., Mark, A.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  93. Ngashangva, L.; Bachu, V.; Goswami, P. Development of new methods for determination of bilirubin. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 162, 272–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. D’Amico, G.; Bazzi, C. Pathophysiology of proteinuria. Kidney Int. 2003, 63, 809–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Marsden, J.; Pickering, D. Urine testing for diabetic analysis. Community Eye Health 2015, 28, 77. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Greaves, P. Hemopoietic and Lymphatic Systems. In Histopathology of Preclinical Toxicity Studies, 4th ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  97. Baumann, M.H.; Bukhari, M.O.; Lehner, K.R.; Anizan, S.; Rice, K.C.; Concheiro, M.; Huestis, M.A. Neuropharmacology of 3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), Its Metabolites, and Related Analogs. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2017, 32, 93–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Eshleman, A.J.; Nagarajan, S.; Wolfrum, K.M.; Reed, J.F.; Swanson, T.L.; Nilsen, A.; Janowsky, A. Structure-activity relationships of bath salt components: Substituted cathinones and benzofurans at biogenic amine transporters. Psychopharmacology 2019, 236, 939–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bluelight. Available online: https://bluelight.org/xf/threads/mephtetramine-methoxypiperamide.668456/ (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  100. Land der Träume. Available online: https://www.land-der-traeume.de/forum.php?t=35538 (accessed on 18 December 2022).
Figure 1. Chemical structures of γ-mephtetramine (MTTA), buphedrone (MABP) and mephedrone (4-MMC) from the Cayman Chemical website (https://www.caymanchem.com, accessed on 25 November 2022, at 1.30 p.m.).
Figure 1. Chemical structures of γ-mephtetramine (MTTA), buphedrone (MABP) and mephedrone (4-MMC) from the Cayman Chemical website (https://www.caymanchem.com, accessed on 25 November 2022, at 1.30 p.m.).
Brainsci 13 00161 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of protocol used for the experiments. Mice were divided into two groups and treated for 4 consecutive weeks (once a week) with vehicle or increasing doses of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg; i.p.). Group one (G1) was employed for safety pharmacology test, performed following each injection. Group two (G2) was employed for biochemical and histological analysis.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of protocol used for the experiments. Mice were divided into two groups and treated for 4 consecutive weeks (once a week) with vehicle or increasing doses of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg; i.p.). Group one (G1) was employed for safety pharmacology test, performed following each injection. Group two (G2) was employed for biochemical and histological analysis.
Brainsci 13 00161 g002
Figure 3. Effects of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg i.p.) on the visual placing response (panel (A)), visual object response (panel (B)), overall tactile response (panel (C)) and start reflex response (panel (D)) of mice. For visual placing test, data are expressed as percentage of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. For visual object response, overall tactile and start reflex tests, data are expressed as arbitrary units and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Figure 3. Effects of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg i.p.) on the visual placing response (panel (A)), visual object response (panel (B)), overall tactile response (panel (C)) and start reflex response (panel (D)) of mice. For visual placing test, data are expressed as percentage of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. For visual object response, overall tactile and start reflex tests, data are expressed as arbitrary units and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Brainsci 13 00161 g003
Figure 4. Effects of MTTA (0.1−30 mg/kg i.p.) on the breath rate (panel (A)), core temperature (panel (B)) and surface temperature (panel (C)) of mice. Breath rate values are expressed as percentage of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Core and surface temperature are expressed as Δ °C of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle. Breath rate. Systemic administration of the highest dose (30 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced breath rate ~ 30% with respect to basal during the first 3 h of experiment, while intermediate doses (1 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) slightly reduced breath rate only at 130 and 40 min, respectively (Figure 4, panel (A); significant effect of treatment (F4,280 = 18.93, p < 0.0001), time (F7,280 = 5.714, p < 0.0001) and time × treatment interaction (F28,280 = 1.273, p = 0.1657).
Figure 4. Effects of MTTA (0.1−30 mg/kg i.p.) on the breath rate (panel (A)), core temperature (panel (B)) and surface temperature (panel (C)) of mice. Breath rate values are expressed as percentage of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Core and surface temperature are expressed as Δ °C of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle. Breath rate. Systemic administration of the highest dose (30 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced breath rate ~ 30% with respect to basal during the first 3 h of experiment, while intermediate doses (1 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) slightly reduced breath rate only at 130 and 40 min, respectively (Figure 4, panel (A); significant effect of treatment (F4,280 = 18.93, p < 0.0001), time (F7,280 = 5.714, p < 0.0001) and time × treatment interaction (F28,280 = 1.273, p = 0.1657).
Brainsci 13 00161 g004
Figure 5. Effects of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg i.p.) on the time on rod (panel (A)), number of steps (panel (B)), mobility time (panel (C)) and grip strength (panel (D)) of mice. Data are expressed as percentage of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Figure 5. Effects of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg i.p.) on the time on rod (panel (A)), number of steps (panel (B)), mobility time (panel (C)) and grip strength (panel (D)) of mice. Data are expressed as percentage of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Brainsci 13 00161 g005
Figure 6. Histological aspects of kidney (A,B), heart (C,D) samples and liver (E,F) in MTTA-treated mice. Kidney: interstitial leucocytes infiltration (see arrows) and segmental sclerosis and collapsing lesion in glomeruli (see arrows). Heart: areas of contraction bands necrosis (see arrows). Liver: hepatocytes hyper-eosinophilia, foci of necrosis, sinusoidal dilatation (see arrows).
Figure 6. Histological aspects of kidney (A,B), heart (C,D) samples and liver (E,F) in MTTA-treated mice. Kidney: interstitial leucocytes infiltration (see arrows) and segmental sclerosis and collapsing lesion in glomeruli (see arrows). Heart: areas of contraction bands necrosis (see arrows). Liver: hepatocytes hyper-eosinophilia, foci of necrosis, sinusoidal dilatation (see arrows).
Brainsci 13 00161 g006
Table 1. Effect of MTTA on blood count (WBC, LYM#, MON#, GRA#, EOS#, LYM%, MON%, GRA%, EOS%, RBC, HGB, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW, PLT, MPV) in mice. The data shown here (see Materials and Methods) refer to the mean ± SEM values relating to eight animals for vehicle and eight for MTTA. Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the two groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Table 1. Effect of MTTA on blood count (WBC, LYM#, MON#, GRA#, EOS#, LYM%, MON%, GRA%, EOS%, RBC, HGB, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW, PLT, MPV) in mice. The data shown here (see Materials and Methods) refer to the mean ± SEM values relating to eight animals for vehicle and eight for MTTA. Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the two groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Blood Count ParametersVehicleMTTAVariations
WBC (103/mm3) 5.02 ± 0.2343.30 ± 0.16 ***⇓⇓
LYM# (103/mm3)2.68 ± 0.2791.63 ± 0.13 ***⇓⇓
MON# (103/mm3)0.26 ± 0.0550.29 ± 0.02-
GRA# (103/mm3)1.38 ± 0.2591.39 ± 0.11-
EOS# (103/mm3)0.36 ± 0.10 0.31 ± 0.10 -
LYM% (%)58.12 ± 2.5238.55 ± 2.13 ***⇓⇓
MON% (%)6.12 ± 0.346.75 ± 0.75 *
GRA% (%)24.64 ± 2.3129.52 ± 2.01 **
EOS% (%)6.51 ± 1.355.54 ± 1.69 -
RBC (106/mm3)8.03 ± 0.176.25 ± 0.28 ***
HGB (g/dL)15.92 ± 0.2710.75 ± 0.50 ***⇓⇓
HCT (%)45.40 ± 1.2334.19 ± 1.57 ***
MCV (μm3)50.11 ± 0.3842.90 ± 0.10 ***
MCH (pg)17.69 ± 0.29 13.62 ± 0.09 ***
MCHC (g/dL)31.50 ± 0.6824.87 ± 0.18 ***
RDW (%)12.64 ± 0.23 11.34 ± 0.27 ***
PLT (103/mm3)583.78 ± 27.38605.69 ± 84.97 -
MPV(μm3)6.09 ± 0.084.88 ± 0.13 ***
Table 2. Effect of MTTA on the clinical chemistry (tCO2, Ca, PHOS, Mg, K+, Na+, CL−) in mice. The data shown here (see Materials and Methods) refer to the mean ± SEM values relating to eight animals for vehicle and eight for MTTA. Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the two groups. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Table 2. Effect of MTTA on the clinical chemistry (tCO2, Ca, PHOS, Mg, K+, Na+, CL−) in mice. The data shown here (see Materials and Methods) refer to the mean ± SEM values relating to eight animals for vehicle and eight for MTTA. Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the two groups. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Electrolyte ParametersVehicleMTTAVariations
tCO2 (mmol/L)12.2 ± 0.2716.8 ± 0.53 ***⇑⇑
Ca (mg/dL)8.9 ± 0.108.24 ± 0.05 ***
PHOS (mg/dL)12.8 ± 0.898.30 ± 0.07 ***⇓⇓
Mg (mg/dL)2.1 ± 0.101.62 ± 0.12 ***
K+ (mmol/L)6.6 ± 0.216.7 ± 0.20-
Na+ (mmol/L)120.0 ± 1.28118.7 ± 0.92 *
Cl- (mmol/L)101.0 ± 0.86103.6 ± 4.35-
Table 3. Effect of MTTA on the clinical chemistry (ALB, TP, GLOB, A/G, TB, GGT, ALT, ALP, AMY, Crea, TC, GLU, Ca, PHOS, BUN/CREA, BUN) in mice. The data shown here (see Materials and Methods) refer to the mean ± SEM values relating to eight animals for vehicle and eight for MTTA. Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the two groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Table 3. Effect of MTTA on the clinical chemistry (ALB, TP, GLOB, A/G, TB, GGT, ALT, ALP, AMY, Crea, TC, GLU, Ca, PHOS, BUN/CREA, BUN) in mice. The data shown here (see Materials and Methods) refer to the mean ± SEM values relating to eight animals for vehicle and eight for MTTA. Student’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05) between the two groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Comprehensive ParametersVehicleMTTAVariations
ALB (g/dL)3.29 ± 0.123.13 ± 0.05 **
TP (g/dL)5.22 ± 0.194.67 ± 0.08 ***
GLOB (g/dL)1.58 ± 0.331.61 ± 0.37-
A/G1.19 ± 0.131.04 ± 0.08 *
TB (mg/L)0.06 ± 0.000.14 ± 0.00 ***⇑⇑⇑
GGT (U/L)1.78 ± 0.002.11 ± 0.26 **
ALT (U/L)109.44 ± 18.8749.66 ± 9.11 ***⇓⇓
ALP (U/L)101.00 ± 3.6246.33 ± 10.52 ***⇓⇓
AMY (U/L)3175 ± 18.302510 ± 521.07 ***
Crea (mg/L)0.11 ± 0.020.66 ± 0.48 **⇑⇑⇑
TC (mg/L)0.00 ± 0.00102.11 ± 19.95 ***⇑⇑⇑
GLU (mg/L)100.25 ± 10.67203.92 ± 22.50 ***⇑⇑⇑
Ca(mg/L)8.37 ± 0.276.24 ± 1.15 **
PHOS (mg/L)6.49 ± 0.535.74 ± 1.22-
BUN/CREA0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00-
BUN (mg/L)20.67 ± 0.56 21.03 ± 0.65-
Regarding electrolyte parameters (Table 2), Ca (t = 16.70, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), PHOS (t = 17.43, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), Mg (t = 8.691, Df = 14, p < 0.0001) and Na+ (t = 2.333, Df = 14, p = 0.0351) are decreased, while tCO2 (t = 21.87, Df = 14, p < 0.0001) is increased. On the other hand, comprehensive parameters (Table 3) show ALB (t = 3.481, Df = 14, p = 0.0037), TP (t = 7.546, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), A/G (t = 2.779, Df = 14, p = 0.0148), ALT (t = 8.069, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), ALP (t = 13.90, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), AMY (t = 3.612, Df = 14, p = 0.0028) and Ca (t = 5.100, Df = 14, p = 0.0002) decrease. On the contrary, parameters TB (t = 160, Df = 14, p < 0.0001), GGT (t = 3.590, Df = 14, p = 0.0030), Crea (t = 3.238, Df = 14, p = 0.0060), GLU (t = 11.78, Df = 14, p < 0.0001) and TG (t = 160, Df = 14, p < 0.0001) are increased.
Table 4. Effects of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg i.p.) on the breath rate (panel A), core temperature (panel B) and surface temperature (panel C) of mice. Breath rate values are expressed as percentage of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Core and surface temperature are expressed as Δ °C of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Table 4. Effects of MTTA (0.1–30 mg/kg i.p.) on the breath rate (panel A), core temperature (panel B) and surface temperature (panel C) of mice. Breath rate values are expressed as percentage of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Core and surface temperature are expressed as Δ °C of baseline and represent the mean ± SEM of 8 mice for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparison. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus vehicle.
Urine ParametersVehicleMTTAVariations
GLU (mg/dL)0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00-
PRO (mg/dL)73.8 ± 12.81141.25 ± 35.68 **⇑⇑
BIL (mg/dL)0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00-
URO (mg/dL)0.60 ± 0.215.75 ± 0.88 ***⇑⇑⇑
pH6.4 ± 0.166.6 ± 0.15 *
S.G.1.0 ± 0.001.0 ± 0.00-
BLD (mg/dL)0.0 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.03 ***
KET (mg/dL)5.6 ± 2.2024.37 ± 8.84 ***⇑⇑⇑
NIT0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00-
LEU(Leu/uL)9.4 ± 4.57134.37 ± 34.38 ***⇑⇑⇑
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Corli, G.; Tirri, M.; Arfè, R.; Marchetti, B.; Bernardi, T.; Borsari, M.; Odoardi, S.; Mestria, S.; Strano-Rossi, S.; Neri, M.; et al. Pharmaco-Toxicological Effects of Atypical Synthetic Cathinone Mephtetramine (MTTA) in Mice: Possible Reasons for Its Brief Appearance over NPSs Scene. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020161

AMA Style

Corli G, Tirri M, Arfè R, Marchetti B, Bernardi T, Borsari M, Odoardi S, Mestria S, Strano-Rossi S, Neri M, et al. Pharmaco-Toxicological Effects of Atypical Synthetic Cathinone Mephtetramine (MTTA) in Mice: Possible Reasons for Its Brief Appearance over NPSs Scene. Brain Sciences. 2023; 13(2):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Corli, Giorgia, Micaela Tirri, Raffaella Arfè, Beatrice Marchetti, Tatiana Bernardi, Martina Borsari, Sara Odoardi, Serena Mestria, Sabina Strano-Rossi, Margherita Neri, and et al. 2023. "Pharmaco-Toxicological Effects of Atypical Synthetic Cathinone Mephtetramine (MTTA) in Mice: Possible Reasons for Its Brief Appearance over NPSs Scene" Brain Sciences 13, no. 2: 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020161

APA Style

Corli, G., Tirri, M., Arfè, R., Marchetti, B., Bernardi, T., Borsari, M., Odoardi, S., Mestria, S., Strano-Rossi, S., Neri, M., Gaudio, R. M., Bilel, S., & Marti, M. (2023). Pharmaco-Toxicological Effects of Atypical Synthetic Cathinone Mephtetramine (MTTA) in Mice: Possible Reasons for Its Brief Appearance over NPSs Scene. Brain Sciences, 13(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop