Next Article in Journal
Host Immune Response to Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV): Insights and Strategies for Effective Vaccine Design
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Explaining Responses to Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccination Among Nurses in Israel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Safety and Efficacy of Influenza Vaccination in Kidney Graft Recipients in Late Period After Kidney Transplantation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in Liver Transplant Recipients: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Real-Life Experience from the Bergamo Center

1
Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation Division, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
2
Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
3
Associazione Amici del Trapianto di Fegato ODV (Ordine dei Volontari), 24127 Bergamo, Italy
4
Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
5
Department of Diagnostic, Paediatric, Clinical and Surgical Science, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
6
Department of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 455; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050455
Submission received: 1 March 2025 / Revised: 13 April 2025 / Accepted: 23 April 2025 / Published: 24 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccine Efficacy and Safety in Transplant Recipients)

Abstract

:
Background: Bergamo was the most severely affected Italian province at the onset of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The liver transplant (LT) patient population should be among the more sensitized to the concept of health prevention. Long-term data on both perception and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in LT recipients since the COVID-19 vaccine became available in Italy are still lacking. Methods: From May to October 2023, a survey on actively followed LT recipients at our institution was carried on by the local patient’ advocacy (Associazione Amici del Trapianto di Fegato) to define the rate of vaccinated subjects, SARS-CoV-2 infections and self-reported COVID-19-related outcomes. Results: Out of the consecutive 753 adult LT recipients invited to the survey, 356 responded (47.3%) [71% male, 63 years old (20–85), LT performed a mean of 9 years (1–26) before vaccination] and were included in the analysis. All patients received the first vaccine dose between December 2020 and January 2022 (81.7% Cominarty®, 17.7% Spikevax®, 0.3% Vaxzevria® and 0.3% Jcovden®). In the following years, adherence to the vaccination policy decreased progressively over time: the second, third, fourth, and fifth vaccine doses were administered to 99%, 94%, 72%, and 22% of the LT population by October, 2023. In total, 43 (12%) and 93 (26%) patients reported a COVID-19 episode before and after [13 (7–21) months] the first vaccination, respectively; none of the LT recipients reported a second COVID-19 infection after the following vaccination cycles. Forty-six (13%) reported short-term post-vaccination mild adverse events but none developed either acute or chronic rejection episodes or hospitalization for COVID-19-related symptoms. A total of 64% of LT recipients resulted positive for anti-nucleocapsid serological test in 2023. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective in LT recipients, underlining once again the importance of vaccination in this special population at higher risk of complications from communicable infectious diseases.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), represented the worst pandemic of the last century. SARS-CoV-2 infection carries a high risk of adverse outcomes in patients with specific conditions including chronic liver disease and liver transplant (LT) patients. These patients suffer from immune dysregulation, immunosuppressive state, and associated comorbidities [1,2]. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at an increased risk of infections due to the immunosuppressant drugs required to prevent graft rejection. In addition, for the same reason, infections can be more severe in transplant recipients than in immunocompetent individuals [3]. Studies on the course and severity of the COVID-19 disease in LT patients reported high hospitalization rates, with more frequent need for mechanical ventilation and high death rates [4,5]. For this reason, vaccinations in LT recipients are highly recommended in LT recipients by the major liver scientific associations such as European (EASL) [3], American (AASLD) [6], and Italian (AISF) [7]. The risk of infection after LT is higher during the first six months, due to the intense immunosuppressive regimens required; therefore, the ideal timing for vaccination should be during the waiting list period: in fact, it is usually advisable to wait 3–6 months after the LT to vaccinate the recipients [8]. Moreover, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated for LT recipients, due to the risk of develop vaccine-induced infection.
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based (Comirnaty® by Pfizer-Bio-NTech, New York, NY, USA, Spikevax® by Moderna, Cambridge, MA, USA) and viral vector-based vaccines (Vaxzevria® by Astrazeneca, Minato City, Janpan, Jcovden® by Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) are approved for the general population, inducing effective protection against COVID-19 [9,10]. Since no data on the efficacy and safety of live-virus vaccines are available among the SOT population, only mRNA vaccines have been recommended in such context. The vaccination campaign has been successful in reducing severity of infections, hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 [11].
The COVID-19 vaccination programs in Italy prioritized healthcare workers, cirrhotic and oncologic patients, and transplant recipients, from the end of December 2020. Initially, two doses three weeks apart were recommended (Comirnaty® schedule). The Italian National Health System provided the vaccines at no charge. Subsequently, Health Authorities strongly recommended a booster dose (third dose) about six months after the second (fall, 2021), when restrictions on the free movement of people were still in place to limit the spread of the virus.
Overall, vaccine acceptance has declined since the onset of the pandemic, and less than 70% of the global population has completed the initial COVID-19 vaccination schedule suggested [12]. In Italy, new vaccine doses, given annually (fourth, fifth doses, etc.), were strongly recommended for the entire population, not just for SOT recipients, but were less widely advertised at the national level.
To date, information on the expected duration of vaccine-induced protection, on the requirement for booster vaccinations and on the level of protection against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, are still lacking.
For a patient, it is not always easy to express fears and symptoms related to vaccination to a doctor. Underreporting patient symptoms to clinicians has led to the integration of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials to better assess disease symptoms, toxicities, and quality of life, as well as patient experiences and preferences. The Association of Friends of Liver Transplants Recipients of Bergamo (Associazione Amici del Trapianto di Fegato ODV—Ordine di Volontari—di Bergamo; http://www.aatf.it; accessed on 19 February 2025) is a volunteer advocacy group founded by LT recipients and their relatives and has been active for over 20 years in Bergamo. The focus of the association is on raising awareness about liver diseases and LT, supporting scientific research, and the development of LT activities. The association also provides logistical and informative support to transplant candidates, recipients, and their families.
Since Bergamo has been the most severely affected Italian province at the onset of the 2020 pandemic, the idea to assess LT patients’ perceptions on COVID-19 infection, vaccination policies, and self-reported symptoms seemed necessary after such catastrophic event. A dedicated survey was promoted by the patients’ advocacy association, integrated with relevant clinical data. The aim of this study was to describe the perception of the vaccination policies for SARS-CoV-2 among LT recipients in one of the areas most afflicted by the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the safety of the vaccine, as per self-reported outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This is a single-center, real-life, cross-sectional study, based on a survey of COVID-19 vaccination outcomes conducted among adult LT recipients, consecutively enrolled at the liver Transplant Center of ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo. The aim of the survey was the evaluation of the perception of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination policy, expressed as number of vaccination cycles performed, safety report and self-reported outcomes.
All 753 patients, transplanted for any indication, aged ≥18 years, alive on 1 March 2023, and attending the outpatient clinic, were invited to complete the survey by the local patients’ advocacy group (The Association of Friends of Liver Transplants). From 15 March to 1 May 2023, the invitations were sent by e-mail, preceded by a phone call from a representative of the advocacy association. The paper version of the anonymous survey was returned either during the planned hepatology follow-up or sent via regular mail. All the responses to the survey, received from 1 May to 31 October 2023, were analyzed for the purpose of this study.
The survey was anonymous, and it included information on the following data:
  • patient’s age in 2023;
  • year of the LT;
  • current weight and height;
  • presence of major comorbidities (namely arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and related therapies);
  • any serologically documented episode of COVID-19 (with possible date and hospitalization) before the first vaccine dose;
  • dates and number of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination cycles, together with the definition of possible side effects (date);
  • any serologically documented episode of COVID-19 after each vaccine dose (possible date and hospitalization).
Patients could rely on the last hepatological outpatient visit to extract any clinical data.
In addition to the survey, patients were offered the option to submit the results of the latest biochemical tests performed in 2023 and the results of the antibody test (anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid) conducted in 2023.
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been administered by intramuscular injection into the deltoid muscle according to the characteristics of the product and its availability in the local healthcare system during COVID-19 vaccination campaigns (indeed, all LT recipients resident in other Italian provinces underwent the vaccination cycles in the medical area of their reference). All patients maintained their routine post-LT follow-up, with regular outpatient visits in the LT clinic (every three to twelve months according to the time from transplantation).
The following definitions were listed in the description of the survey for the patients, along with dedicated fields to input the main results of the laboratory tests.
-
COVID-19 infection was defined by positive result of RT-PCR test or antigenic tests (the tests were performed locally, and they might have differed according to the local laboratory policy).
-
Severe COVID-19 was defined as SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test) requiring hospitalization and/or causing pneumonia, respiratory failure, sepsis, septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, thrombotic events, myocarditis or death.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The sample size needed to test a significant difference between two groups for a population of 753 patients, with a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence level (using p = 0.5 as the estimated proportion between the two groups) has been calculated to be 255 for our study. Data are displayed as median (range) for continuous variables and as number and percentage for categorical variables. For categorical variables, the Chi-Square statistic was used to assess the statistical significance between groups. Analyses were performed using STATA software (release 10.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Overall

Out of the 753 adult LT recipients invited to participate in the survey, 356 (47.3%) responded positively (Figure 1). In 2023, median age of participants was 63 years old (20–85) and 253 (71%) were male (Table 1). According to the survey, first mRNA vaccination was performed between 27 December 2020 (first date available in Italy) and 1 January 2022. However, 337 (94.7%) LT recipients received their first dose before 31 May 2021. The first dose of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was Cominarty® in 291 (81.7%) and Spikevax® in 63 (17.7%); one patient (0.3%) received vector-based Vaxzevria® and one (0.3%) Jcovden®. Eight (2.2%) patients did not receive the recommended second injection of the scheduled vaccine program (3, 4 or 12 weeks apart, according to different vaccine). These eight patients did not report in the survey the reason for not receiving the second dose, but they reported no side effects after the first one. Four out of these eight patients received other mRNA vaccine injections 5 months after the first injection, with three of them experiencing a documented COVID-19 infection (without hospitalization) 6 (4–9) months before the first dose.
In Table 1 are represented the self-reported injections of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine up to 2023: 356 (100%) one dose, 352 (98.9%) two doses, 335 (94.1%) three doses, 256 (71.9%) four doses, and 78 (21.9%) five doses.

3.2. Clinical Data

Demographic and clinical features according to the survey are reported in Table 2. Of the 356 patients who participated in the survey, 71% were male, with a median age of 63 (20–85) years at the time of the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The median BMI of the population was 25 (18–45) kg/m2, with 58% of the cohort being overweight. The main etiology was viral (57%), with 38% undergoing LT due to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In terms of comorbidities, more than 50% had arterial hypertension, about 34% DM, 34% dyslipidemia, and 38% chronic renal failure. At the time of first vaccination, 44% were taking acetylsalicylic acid, and 30% were on statins. Regarding immunosuppression at the time of the first vaccine administration, 52% were on monotherapy with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), such as tacrolimus (FK), while the others were on combination therapy with two or more immunosuppressive drugs (Table 2): thirty-nine (11%) patients had experienced acute rejection in the early post-transplant phase, and 17 (5%) had a diagnosis of chronic rejection. Twelve percent of the cohort experienced a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection before receiving the first vaccine dose.
No significant correlation was found between the clinical features of LT patient described in Table 2 and the risk of reported COVID-19 infection either before or after vaccination.
The events following the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine up to 2023 are summarized in Table 3. Out of the 356 LT recipients, 93 (26%) reported a documented COVID-19 infection 13 months (7–21) after their first vaccination dose. Importantly, none of these individuals experienced a second symptomatic COVID-19 infection, and none were hospitalized due to COVID-19. Additionally, 43 (12%) patients who had experienced COVID-19 infections before vaccination did not report any subsequent infections after receiving the vaccine. Overall, 136 (38%) of the LT recipients reported having experienced a documented COVID-19 infection at some point, either before or after vaccination.
While the descriptive section on vaccinations, clinical data, and COVID-19 infections was filled out by all patients, the section related to the serological data (anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid results performed in 2023) was completed by 93 (26%) of the patients. We have observed that the anti-spike titers increased progressively over time with the number of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. Out of these 93 patients, 60 (64%) had experienced a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (anti-nucleocapsid positive). Anti-spike titers were higher in these 60 (64%) patients who tested positive for the anti-nucleocapsid as compared with the 33 who tested negatives, with levels of 26,667 U/mL (554.2–100,000) vs. 10,418 U/mL (25.6–53,405), respectively.
All the patients that reported COVID-19 infection before their first vaccination (43, 12%) tested positive for anti-nucleocapsid in 2023, with an anti-spike titer of 33,038 U/mL (1910–100,000). None of them experienced a documented COVID-19 infection after first vaccination, and only four (9%) experienced mild AE after first dose of vaccine (diarrhea, asthenia).
A minority of the cohort reported adverse events (AE) after vaccine administration (13%); all symptoms were mild and self-limited. None developed acute rejections, an increase in Aminotransferase level, hospitalization or death after vaccine inoculation. It is relevant that, despite reported mild AE, these patients received 4 (3–5) doses of COVID-19 vaccine.
Overall, the immunosuppressive regimens were modified in 11 patients (3%) in 2023 compared to 2021; this event was not related to vaccination nor COVID-19 infection, with a small increase of everolimus use.
Table 4 shows the trend of the anti-spike titer in 43 patients, for whom more than one blood sample is available at different time points, from after the first two doses of the vaccine to the last available sample collected in 2023, along with the anti-nucleocapsid titer. Additionally, the number of vaccinations, as well as COVID-19 infection before and after the first vaccine dose, are reported, as indicated in the survey. It can be observed that, in almost all transplanted patients, the anti-spike titer increases over time and with the number of vaccinations. Due to the limited number of antibodies reported in the survey and the fact that not all tests were conducted in the same laboratory, it was not possible to identify a protective antibody level against COVID-19. However, as reported in the literature, it appears that the higher the antibody titer, the greater the protection against the infection, and that new vaccinations are safe and lead to an increase in the antibody titer. Patients who had a previous COVID-19 infection developed higher antibody titers, and these titers increased with each subsequent vaccination. Our study showed that patients received multiple vaccinations without reporting new adverse events, and with a reduction in the infection rate (no new COVID-19 infections were reported after the first post-vaccination event).

4. Discussion

In Italy, the COVID-19 vaccination became available and recommended for SOT recipients at the end of December 2020. Initially, two doses three weeks apart, followed by a suggested third dose six months later were indicated (fall 2021) (Comirnaty® schedule), when restrictions on people’s movements were still in place to limit the spread of the virus. New vaccine doses, given annually (fourth, fifth doses, etc.), were strongly recommended for the entire population, including SOT recipients, but were less widely advertised at the national level. However, locally, both health personnel and the patients’ advocacy association continued to recommend SARS-CoV-2 booster shots.
The first result of this study is that only 47.3% of the adult LT population who were followed in Bergamo responded to the survey promoted by the patients’ advocacy group. This is an important point to be noticed in a population that is expected to be highly loyal to the transplant reference center. This could be explained by the patients’ limited interest in the issue of vaccines, and particularly COVID-19, which has been the source of aggressive general discussion in those years. Additionally, it must be noted that, since several LT recipients reside outside the province of Bergamo and even the Lombardy region, it is likely that they might have been less emotionally exposed to the initial COVID-19 pandemic and therefore less sensitized to the topic. Due to the design of the study and the anonymous survey proposed by the patient advocacy group, it was not possible to clinically and socially differentiate the patients who responded to the survey from the patients that did not. This represents an unavoidable clear limitation of the study; however, it also reflects patients’ adherence to COVID-related initiatives and vaccination efforts. In any case, the survey reached almost half of the transplant population, which, based on the analysis of the questionnaires received, seems to be adequately representative of the liver transplanted population in Bergamo.
This adherence rate to the surveys is similar to a previously published study. An anonymous web-based questionnaire was conducted in adult Chinese renal transplant recipients in May 2021: 813 respondents from 30 provinces all over China, participated in the survey, with a response rate of 40.0%. Among the respondents, none of them had a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Only 5.7% of the respondents had received any COVID-19 vaccine, while 94.3% had none; 22.8% SOTRs reported that they were willing to get vaccinated, while 65.6% declared that they were still hesitant and 11.6% refused any vaccine [13]. In the specific case of mRNA vaccines, patients were concerned mainly that they were developed and approved rapidly and that there was lack of knowledge regarding long-term effects and the potential presence of toxic substances within the vaccine [14,15,16].
The vaccination adherence rate progressively declined over time, especially when looking at the 356 patients who responded to the survey. Vaccination adherence remained high for the first doses and during lockdown periods, when movement was restricted and the vaccination certificate was required for greater freedom of movement. As highlighted in Table 1, adherence to the fifth dose was very low, with only 21.9% of patients reporting having received it (in comparison to the 98.9–100% adherence reported for the first two doses).
According to the survey, we were able to observe that none of the 356 patients reported severe adverse reactions to vaccine, required hospitalization, or experienced acute rejection after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine inoculation. Of note, being a survey on alive patients only, any event related to the deceased population cannot be analyzed in this specific cohort. This survey aside, it must be noted that in our clinical practice at the LT center, severe adverse events to vaccine inoculation were not observed nor reported. The data of “no hospitalization” emerging from the survey, indeed correspond to a relevant safety key point, and generally it can be stated that vaccination was well-tolerated and safe. Only a minority of patients reported adverse events, mild and quite “expected” (mild fever, asthenia) in all. Therefore, this could be considered a confirmation of the safety of the new mRNA vaccine. Even the two patients who received the first vaccination with a viral vector did not report any adverse events or rejection. Moreover, even patients experiencing mild AE after the first dose did not report AE after the subsequent new doses of vaccine, thus defining the relevance of the vaccination against new SARS-CoV2 variants.
No significant correlations were found between the characteristics of LT recipients and the risk of experiencing a COVID-19 infection, as reported in the survey. However, several patients might have had a paucisymptomatic infection, without undergoing any specific testing. The availability of serological test only from patients with symptomatic disease and not from the whole cohort represents a further limitation of our study, even though this was not the specific objective of the survey. Moreover, as shown in other paper on this field, no clear risk factors for COVID-19 infection in LT recipients were identified [17,18].
Another important result from this survey is the percentage of reported COVID-19 infection in LT recipients: 12% before and 26% after vaccination, 38% in total. Moreover, according to serological data available in 26% of this cohort, 64% of LT recipients followed by our LT center in Bergamo, resulted positive for anti-nucleocapsid in 2023. One could speculate that vaccinations made infection less symptomatic, given this difference in serological and clinical aspect of the disease: the percentage of transplant patients who had a confirmed prior exposure to COVID-19 (64% anti-nucleocapsid positive in 2023) is higher than the 38% of patients who overall reported a COVID-19 infection (symptomatic and therefore underwent a confirmatory serological test). Additionally, the trend of anti-spike titers increased post-vaccination, rising over time with repeated doses, and was higher in patients that experienced COVID-19 before first vaccination. None of our patients experienced a second COVID-19 infection after the first dose of vaccine, likely as the result of the progressively increasing antibody titers, along with a likely lower virulence of the virus in 2022 and 2023. Of note, even if serological data are available only in 93 LT patients, a rate of 64% anti-nucleocapsid positivity is higher than a 51.8% from a recent Spanish single-center LT cohort [19]. A survey conducted on 251 pediatric liver transplant patients at the end of 2022, where RT-PCR data were available, revealed an Omicron infection rate of 56.2% (141/251), which is similar to the rate reported in the general population (around 60%). Furthermore, in that study, only 61.6% of parents were in favor of COVID-19 vaccination despite the Omicron outbreak [20]. This confirms the consistency of the data emerging from our survey, with 64% of COVID-19 infections in the adult population, despite the aforementioned limitations. Unfortunately, it also confirms a global trend of reduced adherence to vaccination as we move further from the pandemic. This data on adherence could also be influenced by the response rate to the survey, since only half of the patients followed in Bergamo responded to the questionnaire. Those who did respond may also well be the ones generally more compliant with healthcare providers’ recommendations.
Another limitation of this study is related to the fact that serological and virological test were not standardized nor centralized to a single laboratory, but vary according to local laboratory availability, since most patients reside outside the province or region. However, it must be noted that usually, patients tended to consistently use the same laboratory for antibody testing, and therefore, the observed increase in the anti-spike titer over time for each individual patient is valid, supporting the correlation with the increase in the number of vaccinations.
Our study shows that patients received multiple vaccinations without reporting new adverse events, and with a reduction in the infection rates (no new COVID-19 infections were reported after the first post-vaccination event). Given the constant presence of viral mutations, even though cross-protection from the vaccine seems to be present, an annual COVID-19 vaccination program is advisable.
The main limitation of this study, besides being a survey, is the lack of complete serological data for the entire population. On the other hand, it allows us to explore the level of perception of the importance and acceptance of vaccination in a highly loyal and medically engaged population in a region heavily affected by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. No difference in the etiology of liver disease or between male and female patients was highlighted in relation to the completion of the survey.
To overcome the limitations of this study, a serological test for anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies should be performed in the same laboratory for all liver transplant patients. Additionally, two questionnaires should be administered: one anonymous and one administered by a healthcare provider, to assess different responses. The results of the serological test should be matched with the questionnaire administered by the healthcare provider and the clinical characteristics of the patient.
While aiming for new additional data, from our experience, the strong emotional impact of the actual risk of death related to severe COVID-19 in 2020, as well as the desire for mobility in the spring of 2021 (vaccination equaling freedom of movement), resulted in nearly 100% vaccination coverage. In the subsequent waves of SARS-CoV-2, as mortality decreased and the perceived risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID lessened, adherence to vaccination recommendations significantly declined.

5. Conclusions

The mRNA vaccine remains safe and effective in LT recipients. This survey, conducted 2.5 years after the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the transplant patient population, showed that the rate of interest on this topic declined (47.3% adherence to the questionnaires; 22% reported fifth dose of vaccine). It also demonstrates that COVID-19 vaccines are safe (with 13% reporting only mild adverse events) and that the low number of reported events is likely due to repeated vaccination cycles with new doses targeting new variants (64% of patients had contracted COVID-19, based on serological data in 2023). New communication strategies are needed to raise awareness among SOT patients about the importance and utility of administering periodic, updated vaccinations against new variants, as they can further boost antibody levels, enhancing protection against emerging strains of the virus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L. and E.F.; data collection, F.I., T.N., G.A., E.F., F.N., S.C., V.Z., M.V. and S.F.; formal analysis, A.L.; data curation, E.F.; writing—original draft preparation, E.F., A.L. and S.F.; writing—review and editing, A.L., V.Z., M.V. and S.F.; supervision, M.V., S.F. and S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Steering Committee for the COVID-19 studies at ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII approved the study (COVID19_L@B, ethical committee N. 658).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent derives from the completion of an anonymous survey. “The data collected in this study are completely anonymous. No personally identifiable information will be collected and the information you choose to provide in this study cannot be connected back to you. Results from this study may be published or presented at research conferences, and the anonymous data may be shared with other researchers through a data repository. Your participation in this study is voluntary and you may choose to not participate. I have read and understand the above consent form. I certify that I am 18 years old or older. By sending the survey, I indicate my willingness to voluntarily take part in this study”.

Data Availability Statement

Data from the present study are kept confidential but can be provided upon reasonable request to the authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Olivia Anakwe for her help with the English review.

Conflicts of Interest

Alessandro Loglio, speaking and Teaching: Gilead Sciences. Mauro Viganò, Speaking and Teaching: Roche, Gilead Sciences, BMS. Stefano Fagiuoli, Speaking and Teaching: Roche, Gilead Sciences, BMS. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Iavarone, M.; D’Ambrosio, R.; Soria, A.; Triolo, M.; Pugliese, N.; Del Poggio, P.; Perricone, G.; Massironi, S.; Spinetti, A.; Buscarini, E.; et al. High rates of 30-day mortality in patients with cirrhosis and COVID-19. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huang, J.F.; Zheng, K.I.; George, J.; Gao, H.N.; Wei, R.N.; Yan, H.D.; Zheng, M.H. Fatal outcome in a liver transplant recipient with COVID-19. Am. J. Transplant. 2020, 20, 1907–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cornberg, M.; Buti, M.; Eberhardt, C.S.; Grossi, P.A.; Shouval, D. EASL position paper on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with chronic liver diseases, hepatobiliary cancer and liver transplant recipients. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 944–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kulkarni, A.V.; Tevethia, H.V.; Premkumar, M.; Arab, J.P.; Candia, R.; Kumar, K.; Kumar, P.; Sharma, M.; Rao, P.N.; Reddy, D.N. Impact of COVID-19 on liver transplant recipients-A systematic review and metaanalysis. EClinical Med. 2021, 38, 101025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Webb, G.J.; Moon, A.M.; Barnes, E.; Barritt, A.S.; Marjot, T. Determining risk factors for mortality in liver transplant patients with COVID-19. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, P643–P644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fix, O.K.; Blumberg, E.A.; Chang, K.M.; Chu, J.; Chung, R.T.; Goacher, E.K.; Hameed, B.; Kaul, D.R.; Kulik, L.M.; Kwok, R.M.; et al. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Expert Panel Consensus Statement: Vaccines to Prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection in Patients with Liver Disease. Hepatology 2021, 74, 1049–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Russo, F.P.; Piano, S.; Bruno, R.; Burra, P.; Puoti, M.; Masarone, M.; Montagnese, S.; Ponziani, F.R.; Petta, S.; Aghemo, A.; et al. Italian association for the study of the liver position statement on SARS-CoV2 vaccination. Dig. Liver Dis. 2021, 53, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Viganò, M.; Beretta, M.; Lepore, M.; Abete, R.; Benatti, S.V.; Grassini, M.V.; Camagni, S.; Chiodini, G.; Vargiu, S.; Vittori, C.; et al. Vaccination Recommendations in Solid Organ Transplant Adult Candidates and Recipients. Vaccines 2023, 11, 1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. European Medicines Agency. Treatments and Vaccines for COVID-19. Available online: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/coronavirus-response/safe-covid-19-vaccines-europeans_en (accessed on 4 April 2025).
  10. FDA. COVID-19 Vaccines: The FDA Has Regulatory Processes in Place to Facilitate the Development of COVID-19 Vaccines that Meet the FDA’s Rigorous Scientific Standards. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/industry-biologics/coronavirus-covid-19-cber-regulated-biologics (accessed on 10 April 2025).
  11. Marjot, T.; Eberhardt, C.S.; Boettler, T.; Belli, L.S.; Berenguer, M.; Buti, M.; Jalan, R.; Mondelli, M.U.; Moreau, R.; Shouval, D.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on the liver and on the care of patients with chronic liver disease, hepatobiliary cancer, and liver transplantation: An updated EASL position paper. J. Hepatol. 2022, 77, 1161–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mehta, G.; Riva, A.; Ballester, M.P.; Uson, E.; Pujadas, M.; Carvalho-Gomes, Â.; Sahuco, I.; Bono, A.; D’Amico, F.; Viganò, R.; et al. Serological response and breakthrough infection after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cirrhosis and post-liver transplant. Hepatol. Commun. 2023, 7, e0273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, T.; Li, X.; Li, Q.; Huang, L.; Cai, Q.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Lv, Q.; Wang, J.; et al. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and associated factors among solid organ transplant recipients in China. Hum. Vaccine Immunother. 2021, 17, 4999–5006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. World Health Organization. Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019 (accessed on 19 February 2025).
  15. Fuławka, K.; Hertwig, R.; Pachur, T. COVID-19 vaccine refusal is driven by deliberate ignorance and cognitive distortions. npj Vaccines 2024, 9, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Costantino, A.; Morlacchi, L.; Donato, M.F.; Gramegna, A.; Farina, E.; Dibenedetto, C.; Campise, M.; Redaelli, M.; Perego, M.; Alfieri, C.; et al. Hesitancy toward the Full COVID-19 Vaccination among Kidney, Liver and Lung Transplant Recipients in Italy. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fernández, C.F.; Torrón, B.O.; de Quirós Fernández, M.B.; Garrido, R.S.J.; Arroba, C.M.-A.; Alonso, I.J.; Quinto, A.A.M.; Maestro, Ó.C.; Molero, F.C.; Nutu, O.A.; et al. The Impact and Evolution of COVID-19 on Liver Transplant Recipients Throughout the Pandemic “Waves” in a Single Center. Viruses 2025, 17, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rendina, M.; Barone, M.; Lillo, C.; Trapani, S.; Masiero, L.; Trerotoli, P.; Puoti, F.; Lupo, L.G.; Tandoi, F.; Agnes, S.; et al. The Italian data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in transplanted patients support an organ specific immune response in liver recipients. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1203854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Harberts, A.; Schaub, G.M.; Ruether, D.F.; Duengelhoef, P.M.; Brehm, T.T.; Karsten, H.; Fathi, A.; Jahnke-Triankowski, J.; Fischer, L.; Addo, M.M.; et al. Humoral and Cellular Immune Response After Third and Fourth SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in Liver Transplant Recipients. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 2558–2566.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zheng, Z.; Lu, Y.; Wu, H.; Lam, P.U.; Sun, X.; Song, Y.; Ji, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, T.; Feng, M.; et al. Clinical outcomes of Omicron infection and vaccine acceptance among pediatric liver transplant recipients: Insights from a cross-sectional survey. Virol. J. 2024, 21, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Patient disposition: survey response.
Figure 1. Patient disposition: survey response.
Vaccines 13 00455 g001
Table 1. Age, gender, and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received by the 356 liver transplant recipients. Data reported by patients in surveys collected from May to October 2023.
Table 1. Age, gender, and number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received by the 356 liver transplant recipients. Data reported by patients in surveys collected from May to October 2023.
VariablesN = 356
Age at first COVID-19 vaccination, years *63 (20–85)
Males253 (71%)
Vaccine doses received up to 2023
One °356 (100%)
Two352 (98.8%)
Three335 (94.1%)
Four256 (71.9%)
Five78 (21.9%)
* median (range); °: 291 (81.7%) Cominarty, 63 (17.7%) Spikevax, 1 (0.3%) Vaxviera, 1 (0.3%) Jcovden.
Table 2. Demographic and clinical characteristics of 356 subjects at the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.
Table 2. Demographic and clinical characteristics of 356 subjects at the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.
VariablesN = 356VariablesN = 356
Age at LT, years *55 (0–68)Diabetes131 (37%)
Age at first vaccination, years *63 (20–85) Arterial Hypertension206 (58%)
Time from LT to vaccine, yrs *9 (1–26)Dyslipidemia121 (34%)
Males253 (71%)Chronic renal failure135 (38%)
BMI, kg/m2 *25 (18–45)Cardioaspirin157 (44%)
Overweight, BMI > 25 kg/m2206 (58%)Statin107 (30%)
Etiology Immunosuppres. Regimen @
 Viral (HBV/HDV/HCV) °203 (57%) FK186 (52%)
 Metabolic/alcoholic60 (17%) FK + MMF103 (29%)
 Immuno-mediated (AIH, PSC, PBC) °°36 (10%) FK + EVL32 (9%)
 Polycystic liver 21 (6%) FK + Steroid14 (4%)
 Others °°°36 (10%) CSA + MMF or steroids14 (4%)
 Others °°°°7 (2%)
Hepatocellular carcinoma at LT135 (38%)Speen size at first dose, cm *10 (9–23)
Kidney transplant14 (4%)Numbers of acute rejection before first vaccine dose #39 (11%)
Re-transplant14 (4%)Numbers of chronic rejection before first vaccine17 (5%)
Smoke
Active/Previous
21 (6%)/39 (11%)SARS-Cov2 infection before the first vaccine dose43 (12%)
* median (range); ° 61 HBV, hepatitis B virus; 96 HCV, hepatitis C virus; 46 HDV, hepatitis Delta virus; °° 7 AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; 16 PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis; 13 PBC, primary biliary cholangitis; °°° hepatoportal sclerosis, idiopathic liver fibrosis, Caroli disease. @ FK, tacrolimus; MMF, Mycophenolate mofetil; EVL, everolimus; CSA, cyclosporine; °°°° sirolimus or MMF monotherapy. LT, liver transplant. # time from rejection to first vaccine: 9.1 (2.8–22.1) years.
Table 3. Events after first vaccine dose, up to 2023.
Table 3. Events after first vaccine dose, up to 2023.
VariablesN = 356
Time from first vaccine to survey, years *2.5 (2.1–2.8)
Any adverse events reported after vaccine46 (13%) °
Numbers of acute rejections0
Numbers with first COVID infections reported after vaccine93 (26%)
Time from first vaccine to COVID, months *13 (7–21)
Numbers with second COVID infections reported after vaccine0
Numbers of hospitalization for COVID0
Numbers of deaths 0
Immunosuppression regimen at last visit @
 FK171 (48%)
 FK + MMF107 (30%)
 FK + EVL25 (7%)
 FK + Steroid7 (2%)
 CSA + MMF or steroids10 (3%)
 EVL + MMF18 (5%)
 Others °°18 (5%)
Anti-spike titers **
June 2021564 (3.8–33,789) U/mL
December 20211483 (61–8606) U/mL
Summer 202311,360 (6.6–100,000) U/mL
Anti-nucleocapsid positivity in 2023 **60 (64%)
* median (range). ° 23 (50%) asthenia, 3 (7%) diarrhea, 4 (9%) fever, 3 (7%) labial edema, 4 (9%) itching, 4 (9%) myalgias, 4 (9%) headache. °° sirolimus or MMF monotherapy. ** available in 93 patients. @ FK, tacrolimus; MMF, Mycophenolate mofetil; EVL, everolimus; CSA, cyclosporine.
Table 4. Changes in anti-spike titers in patients with reported levels, according to previous COVID-19 infection, number of vaccinations, COVID-19 infection after first vaccine dose and related time, and anti-nucleocapsid in 2023 (43 available samples).
Table 4. Changes in anti-spike titers in patients with reported levels, according to previous COVID-19 infection, number of vaccinations, COVID-19 infection after first vaccine dose and related time, and anti-nucleocapsid in 2023 (43 available samples).
Patient IDCOVID-19 Infection Before First VaccinationNumber of COVID-19 VaccinationsAnti-Spike Titer, After Second Vaccine DoseAnti-Spike Titer, After Third Vaccine DoseAnti-Spike Titer, After Fourth Vaccine DoseAnti-Spike Titer, Last EvaluationFirst COVID-19 Infection After First Dose of VaccineMonths Between First Vaccine and First COVID-19Anti-Nucleocapsid Positive in 2023
2No580.2924.994222,139No No
3No44330 4330No
4No4736 150No
5No550005000 5000No Yes
12No5342 12,300No
14No4564 4351Yes13
15No4120 12,560No
16No513.9 18,985No
18No4520 40,000Yes13
20Yes417471483 28,463No Yes
21Yes4150 100,000No Yes
23Yes5528606 1960No
24No55010 26,667No Yes
26No41357 150Yes13
33No451134347 75,342Yes10Yes
34No3134 5000No Yes
36No4741057 2006No No
37No43.8 12,492No
39No530.12 17,262No Yes
40No3108 15,137No Yes
42No537.8507 33,527No No
44No55052 3970No
45No35.6 7804No Yes
46No40.0361,4 13,700Yes21
49Yes5434927113249,648No Yes
50No4157 18,282Yes12Yes
51No4731800 3152No Yes
52No41.85454 43,075No No
55No41865680 5680No No
61No31710 2948No
65No51883229405431,038No Yes
66No31226983 10,418No No
67No433,789 11,237No Yes
69No465.402443 47,152Yes16No
72No3627 40,000Yes19
73No3928 8629No Yes
74No320802080 36,846No Yes
75Yes3380 60,952No Yes
79No321 629Yes18
80No41198 2080Yes12
84No34963 1778Yes15Yes
88No425.25 29,500No No
90No49.6 2080No
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Loglio, A.; Farina, E.; Ideo, F.; Alfieri, G.; Negri, T.; Neri, F.; Zuccaro, V.; Fagiuoli, S.; Camagni, S.; Viganò, M. COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in Liver Transplant Recipients: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Real-Life Experience from the Bergamo Center. Vaccines 2025, 13, 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050455

AMA Style

Loglio A, Farina E, Ideo F, Alfieri G, Negri T, Neri F, Zuccaro V, Fagiuoli S, Camagni S, Viganò M. COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in Liver Transplant Recipients: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Real-Life Experience from the Bergamo Center. Vaccines. 2025; 13(5):455. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050455

Chicago/Turabian Style

Loglio, Alessandro, Elisa Farina, Francesco Ideo, Giovanni Alfieri, Tiziana Negri, Flavia Neri, Valentina Zuccaro, Stefano Fagiuoli, Stefania Camagni, and Mauro Viganò. 2025. "COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in Liver Transplant Recipients: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Real-Life Experience from the Bergamo Center" Vaccines 13, no. 5: 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050455

APA Style

Loglio, A., Farina, E., Ideo, F., Alfieri, G., Negri, T., Neri, F., Zuccaro, V., Fagiuoli, S., Camagni, S., & Viganò, M. (2025). COVID-19 Vaccine Perception in Liver Transplant Recipients: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Real-Life Experience from the Bergamo Center. Vaccines, 13(5), 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050455

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop