Next Article in Journal
Impact of Systemic Comorbidities on Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma, in a Population from Spain and Portugal
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations Following Topography-Guided LASIK and SMILE for Myopic Correction: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Atypical Manifestation of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Patients with Bronchial Anthracofibrosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Visual Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) in Thin Corneas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Corneal Transplant Rejections in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

1
Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, 11820 S. State St. #200, Draper, UT 84020, USA
2
John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
3
Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT 84107, USA
4
University of Arizona College of Medicine—Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
5
Midwestern University Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(19), 5647; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195647
Submission received: 14 August 2022 / Revised: 14 September 2022 / Accepted: 20 September 2022 / Published: 25 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corneal Surgery: From Innovation to Clinical Praxis)

Abstract

:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antibodies that target and block immune checkpoints. These biologics were initially approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) in 2011 for the management of melanoma. Since then, the use of ICI therapy has increased, with many new medications on the market that treat approximately 50 types of cancers. Patients receiving this therapy are at an increased risk for transplant rejection, including corneal rejection. Ophthalmologists must be aware of individuals receiving ICI therapy as it may be a relative contraindication for patients with a history of corneal transplantation. Patients on ICIs may also experience ocular side effects, including uveitis, dry eye, and inflammation, while on checkpoint inhibitor therapy. This commentary discusses the current understanding of immune checkpoint inhibitors, their mechanism of action, their ocular side effects, and their role in corneal transplant rejection.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies commonly used in the treatment of approximately 50 cancer types including melanoma, bladder, kidney, lung, liver, Merkel cell, and other skin cancers [1]. ICIs revolutionized the fields of chemotherapy and immunotherapy [1] as they introduced a novel mechanism to treat cancer with a less toxic adverse effect profile [2]. The first immune checkpoint inhibitor, ipilimumab (Yervoy), was U.S. FDA approved in 2011 for the treatment of advanced melanoma [3]. Since ipilimumab entered the market, eight more checkpoint inhibitors have become available [4,5].
Immune checkpoints involve stimulatory and inhibitory pathways that affect immune cells and maintain a balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling [6]. Cancer cells stimulate inhibitory immune checkpoints leading to a reduction in the normal immune response; thus, the mechanism to suppress cancerous cells is no longer functional [7]. Because the cancer cells have escaped the immune response, they can continue to grow. ICIs function by blocking the effects of specific inhibitory pathways [4]. Because of this overactive immune response, the immune system can target antigenic cells, including cancerous cells and transplanted donor tissue.
Inhibition of the T cell response, which is a target of CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors, is thought to be responsible for the donor transplant rejections, including corneal tissue. CTLA-4 is upregulated on active T cells and competes with the CD28 costimulatory molecule on T cells to bind to the B7-1 and B7-2 ligands on the antigen-presenting cell (APC) in order to inhibit T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. This ultimately suppresses CD-28 mediated T cell activation (Figure 1) [8,9]. In addition to CTLA-4, PD-1 is upregulated on active T cells. PD-1 binds to its ligand, PD-L1, on the APC and inhibits T cell activation (Figure 2) [9]. Inhibition of these molecules and other immune checkpoints, including but not limited to Lag-3, Tim-3, Tigit, and Vista [9], results in an immune-mediated response involving T cell overactivity [2]. These T cells undergo clonal proliferation and form CD4+ T helper cells [10]. Through various mechanisms, CD4+ cells cause a delayed-type hypersensitivity immune response directed at the alloantigens on the graft [10]. As the name suggests, these alloantigens are antigenically different, like cancer cells, so the recipient perceives them as foreign [11,12]. This immune response destroys the allogeneic/donor transplant tissue, including corneal tissue [10].
Eye care professionals may encounter patients who experience ocular changes while on ICI therapy. The spectrum of toxicity of the ICIs is referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) [13]. Ocular side effects or irAEs, including conjunctivitis, uveitis, dry eye, ocular myasthenia gravis, retinal detachment, uveal effusion, and inflammation, have been reported in patients on atezolizumab, avelumab, cemiplimab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab [13,14]. A unique complication, Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease-like pan-uveitis, has also been seen in a patient on nivolumab therapy [15]. Resolution of symptoms often occurs after administration of corticosteroids [16]. Individuals presenting with these side effects should prompt eye care professionals to inquire about ICI use, especially those with a history of cancer.
ICIs have been implicated in solid organ transplant rejection, including the heart, liver, and kidneys [17,18,19,20]. While studies are lacking regarding all ICIs and transplant surgery, CTLA-4 medications have shown lower rates of rejection than the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors [21]. The use of PD-1/PD-L1 agents, especially nivolumab and pembrolizumab, is contraindicated in solid organ transplants owing to high rejection rates [22]. A hypothesized cause of elevated transplant rejection rates while on ICI therapy is the inhibition of PD-1/PD-L1 in host T-cells and graft dendritic cells [23]. Thus, ICIs are relatively contraindicated for organ transplant recipients.
PD-L1 is highly expressed within the corneal endothelium, allowing for increased interaction between PD-L1 and ICIs [24]. Both PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have consistently been associated with higher rates of corneal rejection [22]. In mice injected with antibodies against PD-1, the rate of rejection in corneal allografts was 100% [25,26]. The average rate of solid transplant rejection in the United States general population is 10–20%, while patients on ICI therapy approach 41% [27]. In general, the rate of corneal rejection ranges from 2.3% to 68% [28]. Although the incidence of corneal transplant rejection in patients using ICIs is relatively low, ophthalmologists must consider the risk of corneal rejection as increased rates have been reported in other solid organ transplant procedures [29].
Over the years, there has been some correlation between ICIs and corneal rejection. In one case report, an 85-year-old woman with worsening visual acuity experienced corneal rejection after initiating nivolumab therapy one year after her corneal transplant [30]. A second report of corneal rejection occurred in a woman three months after initiating pembrolizumab for urothelial cell carcinoma [31]. Signs of transplant rejection include worsening visual acuity, corneal edema, corneal vascularization, and stromal or subepithelial infiltrates. The evaluation and management of patients on ICI therapy presenting with signs of acute rejection includes a thorough slit lamp examination, corneal thickness measurements, and corticosteroid administration [16,32]. One study suggests that taking the risk with ICIs may be worthwhile if the patient has had a corneal transplant in one eye, but good vision in the other [25]. However, the decision to start a patient on ICIs may require more scrutiny in those with bilateral transplants or monocular patients with good vision only in the eye with the corneal graft as there is a greater risk associated with these conditions.
After beginning checkpoint inhibitor therapy, a baseline eye examination is recommended in corneal graft patients [31]. Consultation is encouraged between the ophthalmologist and the managing oncologist regarding patient disease and the risks of medication discontinuation. In patients undergoing ICI therapy, corneal transplantation and potential rejection should be weighed carefully, considering the general medical need of the patient versus the risk of visual impairment.
  • Conclusions
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies indicated for solid tumor treatment. Since 2011, ICIs have become first- or second-line therapeutics for cancer management. Patients receiving this therapy may experience ocular side effects, including uveitis, dry eye, ocular myasthenia gravis, and inflammation. Management of these symptoms typically consists of topical or systemic corticosteroids. A more severe potential complication of these medications is transplant rejection, including corneal rejection. Ocular management of patients with a history of corneal transplants is recommended before and after beginning ICI therapy and should include a comprehensive eye examination, detailed corneal assessment, and collaboration with the patient’s primary care physician and oncologist for prevention and treatment of any adverse effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., N.F.B. and T.S.S.; resources, M.M., Y.C.R. and P.C.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M., N.F.B. and T.S.S.; writing—review and editing, M.M., N.F.B., B.K.P., Y.C.R. and P.C.H.; supervision, M.M., B.K.P., Y.C.R. and P.C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Robert, C. A decade of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Marin-Acevedo, J.A.; Kimbrough, E.M.O.; Lou, Y. Next generation of immune checkpoint inhibitors and beyond. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 14, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dobosz, P.; Dzieciątkowski, T. The Intriguing History of Cancer Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Immunomodulators: Checkpoint Inhibitors, Cytokines, Agonists, Adjuvants—Cancer Research Institute (CRI). Available online: https://www.cancerresearch.org/en-us/immunotherapy/treatment-types/immunomodulators-checkpoint-inhibitors (accessed on 23 May 2022).
  5. Vaddepally, R.K.; Kharel, P.; Pandey, R.; Garje, R.; Chandra, A.B. Review of Indications of FDA-Approved Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors per NCCN Guidelines with the Level of Evidence. Cancers 2020, 12, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pardoll, D.M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vinay, D.S.; Ryan, E.P.; Pawelec, G.; Talib, W.H.; Stagg, J.; Elkord, E.; Lichtor, T.; Decker, W.K.; Whelan, R.L.; Kumara, H.M.C.S.; et al. Immune evasion in cancer: Mechanistic basis and therapeutic strategies. In Seminars in Cancer Biology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; Volume 35, pp. S185–S198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Linsley, P.S.; Greene, J.A.L.; Brady, W.; Bajorath, J.; Ledbetter, J.A.; Peach, R. Human B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) bind with similar avidities but distinct kinetics to CD28 and CTLA-4 receptors. Immunity 1994, 1, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, S.C.; Duffy, C.R.; Allison, J.P. Fundamental Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 1069–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Niederkorn, J.Y. Immune mechanisms of corneal allograft rejection. Curr. Eye Res. 2007, 32, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Responses to Alloantigens and Transplant Rejection—Immunobiology—NCBI Bookshelf. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27163/ (accessed on 9 June 2022).
  12. Vigneron, N. Human Tumor Antigens and Cancer Immunotherapy. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 948501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhou, Y.W.; Wang, Y.; Xia, R.L.; Liu, J.Y.; Ma, X.L. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated ophthalmic adverse events: Current understanding of its mechanisms, diagnosis, and management. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 15, 646–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fang, T.; Maberley, D.A.; Etminan, M. Ocular adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Curr. Ophthalmol. 2019, 31, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wong, R.K.; Lee, J.K.; Huang, J.J. Bilateral drug (ipilimumab)-induced vitritis, choroiditis, and serious retinal detachments suggestive of vogt-koyanagi-harada syndrome. Retin. Cases Brief Rep. 2012, 6, 423–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dalvin, L.A.; Shields, C.L.; Orloff, M.; Sato, T.; Shields, J.A. Checkpoint Inhibitor Immune Therapy: Systemic Indications and Ophthalmic Side Effects. Retina 2018, 38, 1063–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gassmann, D.; Weiler, S.; Mertens, J.C.; Reiner, C.S.; Vrugt, B.; Nägeli, M.; Mangana, J.; Müllhaupt, B.; Jenni, F.; Misselwitz, B. Liver Allograft Failure After Nivolumab Treatment—A Case Report With Systematic Literature Research. Transplant. Direct 2018, 4, e376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lai, H.C.; Lin, J.F.; Hwang, T.I.S.; Liu, Y.F.; Yang, A.H.; Wu, C.K. Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD-1) Inhibitors in Renal Transplant Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Double-Edged Sword? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ong, M.; Ibrahim, A.M.; Bourassa-Blanchette, S.; Canil, C.; Fairhead, T.; Knoll, G. Antitumor activity of nivolumab on hemodialysis after renal allograft rejection. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2016, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Owonikoko, T.K.; Kumar, M.; Yang, S.; Kamphorst, A.O.; Pillai, R.N.; Akondy, R.; Nautiyal, V.; Chatwal, M.S.; Book, W.M.; Sahu, A.; et al. Cardiac allograft rejection as a complication of PD-1 checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy: A case report. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2017, 66, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kittai, A.S.; Oldham, H.; Cetnar, J.; Taylor, M. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Organ Transplant Patients. J. Immunother. 2017, 40, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aguirre, L.E.; Guzman, M.E.; Lopes, G.; Hurley, J. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and the Risk of Allograft Rejection: A Comprehensive Analysis on an Emerging Issue. Oncologist 2019, 24, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Spain, L.; Higgins, R.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Turajlic, S.; Gore, M.; Larkin, J. Acute renal allograft rejection after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for metastatic melanoma. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, 1135–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, W.; Li, H.; Chen, P.W.; Alizadeh, H.; He, Y.; Hogan, R.N.; Niederkorn, J.Y. PD-L1 Expression on Human Ocular Cells and Its Possible Role in Regulating Immune-Mediated Ocular Inflammation. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sandhu, H.S.; Hemmati, H.D.; Dana, R. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and corneal transplant rejection: A call for awareness. Immunotherapy 2020, 12, 947–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hori, J.; Kunishige, T.; Nakano, Y. Immune Checkpoints Contribute Corneal Immune Privilege: Implications for Dry Eye Associated with Checkpoint Inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kumar, V.; Shinagare, A.B.; Rennke, H.G.; Ghai, S.; Lorch, J.H.; Ott, P.A.; Rahma, O.E. The Safety and Efficacy of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Systematic Review of Literature. Oncologist 2020, 25, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Panda, A.; Vanathi, M.; Kumar, A.; Dash, Y.; Priya, S. Corneal graft rejection. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2007, 52, 375–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nguyen, L.S.; Ortuno, S.; Lebrun-Vignes, B.; Johnson, D.B.; Moslehi, J.J.; Hertig, A.; Salem, J.-E. Transplant rejections associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A pharmacovigilance study and systematic literature review. Eur. J. Cancer 2021, 148, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. le Fournis, S.; Gohier, P.; Urban, T.; Jeanfaivre, T.; Hureaux, J. Corneal graft rejection in a patient treated with nivolumab for primary lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2016, 102, 28–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vanhonsebrouck, E.; van de Walle, M.; Lybaert, W.; Kruse, V.; Roels, D. Bilateral Corneal Graft Rejection Associated With Pembrolizumab Treatment. Cornea 2020, 39, 1436–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Azevedo Magalhaes, O.; Shalaby Bardan, A.; Zarei-Ghanavati, M.; Liu, C. Literature review and suggested protocol for prevention and treatment of corneal graft rejection. Eye 2020, 34, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) No ICI (B) CTLA-4 inhibitor mechanism. Abbreviations: APC: antigen-presenting cell; PD-1: programmed death-1; PD-L1: programmed death ligand-1; CTLA-4: cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated molecule-4; CD28: cluster of differentiation 28; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; MHC: major histocompatibility complex; TCR: T cell receptor.
Figure 1. (A) No ICI (B) CTLA-4 inhibitor mechanism. Abbreviations: APC: antigen-presenting cell; PD-1: programmed death-1; PD-L1: programmed death ligand-1; CTLA-4: cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated molecule-4; CD28: cluster of differentiation 28; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; MHC: major histocompatibility complex; TCR: T cell receptor.
Jcm 11 05647 g001
Figure 2. (A) No ICI (B) PD-1 inhibitor mechanism (C) PD-L1 inhibitor mechanism. Abbreviations: APC: antigen-presenting cell; PD-1: programmed death-1; PD-L1: programmed death ligand-1; CTLA-4: cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated molecule-4; CD28: cluster of differentiation 28; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; MHC: major histocompatibility complex; TCR: T cell receptor.
Figure 2. (A) No ICI (B) PD-1 inhibitor mechanism (C) PD-L1 inhibitor mechanism. Abbreviations: APC: antigen-presenting cell; PD-1: programmed death-1; PD-L1: programmed death ligand-1; CTLA-4: cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated molecule-4; CD28: cluster of differentiation 28; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; MHC: major histocompatibility complex; TCR: T cell receptor.
Jcm 11 05647 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moshirfar, M.; Basharat, N.F.; Seitz, T.S.; Ply, B.K.; Ronquillo, Y.C.; Hoopes, P.C. Corneal Transplant Rejections in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5647. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195647

AMA Style

Moshirfar M, Basharat NF, Seitz TS, Ply BK, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC. Corneal Transplant Rejections in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(19):5647. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moshirfar, Majid, Noor F. Basharat, Tanner S. Seitz, Briana K. Ply, Yasmyne C. Ronquillo, and Phillip C. Hoopes. 2022. "Corneal Transplant Rejections in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 19: 5647. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop