Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance during Pregnancy and Influencing Factors in South Korea
Next Article in Special Issue
Risk–Benefit Balance of Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone Inhibitor Cessation in Heart Failure Patients with Hyperkalemia
Previous Article in Journal
Frequency, Characteristics, and Predictive Factors of Adverse Drug Events in an Adult Emergency Department according to Age: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hemostasis Disturbances in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (CF-LVAD) Patients—Rationale and Study Design
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Left Ventricular Diastolic Indices and Their Impact on Outcomes in Patients with Recently Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(19), 5732; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195732
by Nobuhiro Ikemura 1,2, Koki Nakanishi 3, John A. Spertus 2, Carolyn S. P. Lam 4, Takehiro Kimura 1, Yoshinori Katsumata 1, Taishi Fujisawa 1, Ikuko Ueda 1, Takahiro Ohki 5, Keiichi Fukuda 1, Seiji Takatsuki 1 and Shun Kohsaka 1,*
Reviewer 1:
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(19), 5732; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195732
Submission received: 4 September 2022 / Revised: 20 September 2022 / Accepted: 25 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Perspectives in Heart Failure)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1)      Please append information how the group size was calculated.

2)      Were the echo results verified or cross-checked during the study? Mean LA diameter result is very small and range narrow all in all groups (40-41 mm), even in the group with 11% of moderate to severe MR and ongoing AFib – please comment on that as it not often seen in clinical practice.

3)      Please provide the number of patients with inadequate image quality to perform EF and LVDD measurements.

4)      Patients with  no diastolic disfunction had higher BNP and larger LA diameter than subjects with mild diastolic disfunction – please comment on that.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In the present work (Left Ventricular Diastolic Indices and Teir Impact on Outcomes in Patients with Recently Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation), authors expose an interesting study where they review the influence of Left Ventricular Diastolic Disfunction (LVDD) in patients with preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and newly diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation. It is a valuable paper, well written, with updated bibliography and with some quite interesting results.

Although authors present quite an interesting paper, there are still some issues that if addressed, may improve their work.

1#. Left Atrial enlargement is excluded for grading patients with LVDD. Authors correctly affirm that it is highly present in patients with LVDD, but this is not a reason to be excluded. Although In table 1 is shown that it is equally distributed among all groups, authors should include a statement in limitations, since it is not known how it would affect in patient classification.

#2. Patients with LVDD are older and have more Cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, CKD and Coronary A. Disease). Although this factors are included in the multivariate analysis, authors should still include this in the limitations section, since this is an observational study and it is not known how it would affect the results.

Thanks for letting me review this article.

Good luck in your further investigations.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

All issues were clarified.

Back to TopTop