Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Acute High-Altitude Exposure on Oral Pathogenic Bacteria and Salivary Oxi-Inflammatory Markers
Previous Article in Journal
Association Between Arch-Shaped Hypo-Autofluorescent Lesions Detected Using Fundus Autofluorescence and Postoperative Hypotony
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Blood Flow Restriction Training and Its Use in Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1
Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
2
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(20), 6265; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206265
Submission received: 8 September 2024 / Revised: 11 October 2024 / Accepted: 17 October 2024 / Published: 20 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Rehabilitation)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is often followed by significant muscle atrophy and subsequent loss of strength. Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) has recently emerged as a potential mode of rehabilitation to mitigate these effects. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of BFRT in functional recovery when compared to traditional rehabilitation methods. Methods: A literature review was conducted across July and August 2024 using multiple databases that reported randomised controlled trials comparing BFRT to traditional rehabilitation methods. Primary outcomes were changes to thigh muscle mass and knee extensor/flexor strength with secondary outcomes consisting of patient-reported functional measures (IKDC and Lysholm scores). The RoB-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria; however, substantial heterogeneity prevented a meta-analysis being conducted for the primary outcomes. Three out of the five studies measuring muscle mass reported significant (p < 0.05) findings favouring BFRT. There was variation amongst the strength improvements, but BFRT was generally favoured over the control. Meta analysis of the secondary outcomes showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) favouring BFRT despite moderate heterogeneity. Conclusions: BFRT shows promise for maintaining muscle mass and improving patient reported outcomes following ACL reconstruction. However, the high risk of bias limits the strength of these conclusions. Further high-quality research needs to be conducted to establish optimal BFRT protocols for this cohort and to determine if BFRT has a place in ACL rehabilitation.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; blood flow restriction training; rehabilitation; ACLR; functional recovery anterior cruciate ligament; blood flow restriction training; rehabilitation; ACLR; functional recovery

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Butt, J.; Ahmed, Z. Blood Flow Restriction Training and Its Use in Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6265. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206265

AMA Style

Butt J, Ahmed Z. Blood Flow Restriction Training and Its Use in Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(20):6265. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206265

Chicago/Turabian Style

Butt, Jamaal, and Zubair Ahmed. 2024. "Blood Flow Restriction Training and Its Use in Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 20: 6265. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206265

APA Style

Butt, J., & Ahmed, Z. (2024). Blood Flow Restriction Training and Its Use in Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(20), 6265. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206265

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop