Next Article in Journal
An Appraisal of the Evidence behind the Use of the CHRODIS Plus Initiative for Chronic Pain: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
A High-Grade Lachman’s Exam Predicts a Ramp Tear of the Medial Meniscus in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: A Prospective Clinical and Radiological Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Zygomatic Implant Insertion in MRONJ: A Case Report with a Follow-Up of 3 Years
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Breakthroughs in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

by
Alessandro Antonelli
*,
Francesco Bennardo
and
Amerigo Giudice
School of Dentistry, Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(3), 685; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030685
Submission received: 7 January 2024 / Accepted: 18 January 2024 / Published: 24 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Breakthroughs in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery)

1. Introduction

In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, continuous advances have ushered in a new era of innovation, profoundly influencing this branch of medicine. Cutting-edge technologies, techniques, and detailed analysis of the patient’s local and general clinical conditions have transformed traditional surgical procedures, improving precision, efficiency, and patient outcomes [1,2].
From individual case planning using surgical simulation software to the use of 3D printing to create stereolithographic models and customized prostheses, the landscape of oral surgery has evolved significantly [3].

2. Discussion

Breakthroughs in oral and maxillofacial surgery have been driven by continuous research, innovation, and collaboration among surgeons, researchers, and engineers. The development and improvement in surgical techniques have enabled complex procedures such as orthognathic surgery, oncologic, and reconstructive surgery and the management of facial trauma to be performed with greater precision and improved outcomes [4,5,6]. Furthermore, the introduction of advanced imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT) scans and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), has revolutionized diagnosis and treatment planning by providing detailed 3D images of the oral and facial structures [7,8,9].
In addition, the integration of three-dimensional imaging for the analysis of bone structures with non-invasive devices that enable the analysis of facial soft tissue has made it possible to more accurately assess the benefits that patients can derive from new surgical methods and custom-made treatment plans [10].
This background includes the latest generation of facial scanners and devices accessible to everyone, such as smartphones, that allow the capture of high-resolution 3D images of the patient’s facial anatomy with remarkable precision [11]. Surgeons leverage this technology to create detailed digital models, enabling them to analyze complex craniofacial structures and plan interventions with unprecedented accuracy [12,13]. In fact, the relevance of encoded parameters becomes even more pronounced in the field of precision medicine, where tailored treatment strategies are designed based on individualized patient profiles [14].
As a result of continuous innovations in the medical and pharmacological fields, researchers have also had to find solutions to possible adverse reactions due to interactions with new drugs [15,16]. In particular, the development of new monoclonal antibodies for the management and treatment of oncological pathologies has had important repercussions on the management of pathologies associated with the action of these drugs on the maxillary bone [17].
The importance of the management of these patients, often subjected to multiple therapies, has highlighted the relevance of the management of possible odontogenic infections that can trigger adverse processes such as medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws [18]. In fact, researchers have recently demonstrated that the focus of this pathology is the inflammatory-infective state of the periodontal and alveolar bone, which is the main clue for the onset of this adverse drug reaction [18,19].
In recent years, during the COVID-19 pandemic, significant advancements and breakthroughs in oral surgery have emerged, driven by the need for enhanced safety measures and improved patient care [20]. The usefulness of telemedicine and virtual consultations has streamlined the pre-operative assessment process, reducing hospital access and minimizing potential exposure to the virus [20,21]. Furthermore, the rigorous infection control protocols implemented in oral surgery units have not only safeguarded patients and healthcare providers but have also set new standards for hygiene and safety in the field [22,23,24].
Another field of oral and maxillofacial surgery in which researchers have developed new procedures and analyzed biological phenomena is prosthetic implant surgery [25]. Although great emphasis has been placed on guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures over the years, they are still often unpredictable and difficult to perform [26]. For this reason, clinicians and researchers have developed implant designs in consultation with engineers to exploit as much residual native bone as possible [27,28]. Equally, interest has been placed on new surgical methods for implant site preparation to modify the bone density at the osteotomy site walls to achieve higher and more predictable primary stability values [29,30,31,32,33,34]. In fact, it has been observed that a parameter such as primary implant stability is directly linked to the biological phenomenon of osseointegration and thus obtains a better success rate of implant prosthetic therapy in the medium to long term [35,36]. Precisely for this reason, another biological factor that is monitored over time is crestal marginal bone loss, which can occur over time and lead to possible peri-implantitis phenomena [37,38,39].
Taken together, the research included in this Special Issue highlights the relevance of new discoveries and breakthroughs in oral and maxillofacial surgery to improve routine care for a wide range of diseases that impact patient health. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider how a patient-specific approach has become necessary for optimal management of each individual clinical scenario.

3. Conclusions

In light of these considerations, clinicians and researchers should be aware of the need to implement notions coming from the medical and surgical fields with modern technological systems that benefit from engineering concepts for new therapeutic approaches that are changing the clinical scenario of facial pathologies. The relevance of breakthroughs in oral and maxillofacial surgery has become even more evident in the field of precision medicine, where tailored treatment strategies are designed based on individualized patient profiles.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Singhal, I.; Kaur, G.; Neefs, D.; Pathak, A. A Literature Review of the Future of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Oral Pathology, and Oral Surgery in the Hands of Technology. Cureus 2023, 15, e45804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Reddy, C.L.; Patterson, R.H.; Wasserman, I.; Meara, J.G.; Afshar, S. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Opportunity to Improve Surgical Care and Advance Sustainable Development Globally. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 32, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Meglioli, M.; Naveau, A.; Macaluso, G.M.; Catros, S. 3D printed bone models in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: A systematic review. 3D Print Med. 2020, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, Z.; Mo, S.; Fan, X.; You, Y.; Ye, G.; Zhou, N. A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Virtual Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Based on Randomized Clinical Trials. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 79, e1–e471.e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mazzola, F.; Smithers, F.; Cheng, K.; Mukherjee, P.; Hubert Low, T.H.; Ch’ng, S.; Palme, C.E.; Clark, J.R. Time and cost-analysis of virtual surgical planning for head and neck reconstruction: A matched pair analysis. Oral Oncol. 2020, 100, 104491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sivolella, S.; Brunello, G.; Panda, S.; Schiavon, L.; Khoury, F.; Del Fabbro, M. The Bone Lid Technique in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Scoping Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Barone, S.; Antonelli, A.; Averta, F.; Diodati, F.; Muraca, D.; Bennardo, F.; Giudice, A. Does Mandibular Gonial Angle Influence the Eruption Pattern of the Lower Third Molar? A Three-Dimensional Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Assouline, S.L.; Meyer, C.; Weber, E.; Chatelain, B.; Barrabe, A.; Sigaux, N.; Louvrier, A. How useful is intraoperative cone beam computed tomography in maxillofacial surgery? An overview of the current literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 50, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barone, S.; Antonelli, A.; Bocchino, T.; Cevidanes, L.; Michelotti, A.; Giudice, A. Managing Mandibular Second Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2023, 81, 1403–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, Y.J.; Xiong, Y.X.; Wang, Y. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Facial Scan for Facial Deformities in Clinics: A New Evaluation Method for Facial Scanner Accuracy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Antonelli, A.; Barone, S.; Bennardo, F.; Giudice, A. Three-dimensional facial swelling evaluation of pre-operative single-dose of prednisone in third molar surgery: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health 2023, 23, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Antonacci, D.; Caponio, V.C.A.; Troiano, G.; Pompeo, M.G.; Gianfreda, F.; Canullo, L. Facial scanning technologies in the era of digital workflow: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2023, 67, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rasteau, S.; Sigaux, N.; Louvrier, A.; Bouletreau, P. Three-dimensional acquisition technologies for facial soft tissues—Applications and prospects in orthognathic surgery. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 121, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schwendicke, F.; Krois, J. Precision dentistry-what it is, where it fails (yet), and how to get there. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 3395–3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aziz, Y.; Rademacher, W.M.H.; Hielema, A.; Wishaw, S.B.P.; van Diermen, D.E.; de Lange, J.; Vissink, A.; Rozema, F.R. Oral adverse effects: Drug-induced tongue disorders. Oral Dis. 2021, 27, 1528–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fung, P.; Bedogni, G.; Bedogni, A.; Petrie, A.; Porter, S.; Campisi, G.; Bagan, J.; Fusco, V.; Saia, G.; Acham, S.; et al. Time to onset of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: A multicentre retrospective cohort study. Oral Dis. 2017, 23, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Amigo-Basilio, M.; Álvarez-González, C.; Cobo-Vázquez, C.; Leco-Berrocal, I.; Sáez-Alcaide, L.M.; Méniz-García, C. Management of Patients under Treatment with Monoclonal Antibodies and New Biological Therapies. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Otto, S.; Aljohani, S.; Fliefel, R.; Ecke, S.; Ristow, O.; Burian, E.; Troeltzsch, M.; Pautke, C.; Ehrenfeld, M. Infection as an Important Factor in Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ). Medicina 2021, 57, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kuehn, S.; Scariot, R.; Elsalanty, M. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis: Why the Jawbone? Dent. J. 2023, 11, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zimmermann, M.; Nkenke, E. Approaches to the management of patients in oral and maxillofacial surgery during COVID-19 pandemic. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2020, 48, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gangwani, P.; Mooneyham, R.; Feng, C.; Kopycka-Kedzierawski, D.; Kolokythas, A. Accuracy of Telemedicine Consultations in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2023, 81, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alterman, M.; Nassar, M.; Rushinek, H.; Cohen, A.; Shapira, L.; Casap, N. The efficacy of a protective protocol for oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures in a COVID-19 pandemic area-results from 1471 patients. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 25, 5001–5008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sbricoli, L.; Schiavon, L.; Brunello, G.; Brun, P.; Becker, K.; Sivolella, S. Efficacy of different mouthwashes against COVID-19: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2023, 59, 334–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhurakivska, K.; Troiano, G.; Pannone, G.; Caponio, V.C.A.; Lo Muzio, L. An Overview of the Temporal Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Clinical Specimens. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Heboyan, A.; Zafar, M.S.; Karobari, M.I.; Tribst, J.P.M. Insights into Polymeric Materials for Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology. Materials 2022, 15, 5383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ivanovski, S.; Breik, O.; Carluccio, D.; Alayan, J.; Staples, R.; Vaquette, C. 3D printing for bone regeneration: Challenges and opportunities for achieving predictability. Periodontology 2023, 93, 358–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gupta, Y.; Iyer, R.; Dommeti, V.K.; Nutu, E.; Rana, M.; Merdji, A.; Biswas, J.K.; Roy, S. Design of dental implant using design of experiment and topology optimization: A finite element analysis study. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 2021, 235, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Antonelli, A.; Barone, S.; Attanasio, F.; Salviati, M.; Cerra, M.G.; Calabria, E.; Bennardo, F.; Giudice, A. Effect of Implant Macro-Design and Magnetodynamic Surgical Preparation on Primary Implant Stability: An In Vitro Investigation. Dent. J. 2023, 11, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Linn, T.Y.; Salamanca, E.; Aung, L.M.; Huang, T.K.; Wu, Y.F.; Chang, W.J. Accuracy of implant site preparation in robotic navigated dental implant surgery. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2023, 25, 881–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhargava, N.; Perrotti, V.; Caponio, V.C.A.; Matsubara, V.H.; Patalwala, D.; Quaranta, A. Comparison of heat production and bone architecture changes in the implant site preparation with compressive osteotomes, osseodensification technique, piezoelectric devices, and standard drills: An ex vivo study on porcine ribs. Odontology 2023, 111, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stacchi, C.; Troiano, G.; Montaruli, G.; Mozzati, M.; Lamazza, L.; Antonelli, A.; Giudice, A.; Lombardi, T. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: Osseodensification drills versus piezoelectric surgery. A multi-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2023, 25, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. El-Kholey, K.E.; Elkomy, A. Does the Drilling Technique for Implant Site Preparation Enhance Implant Success in Low-Density Bone? A Systematic Review. Implant Dent. 2019, 28, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mello-Machado, R.C.; Sartoretto, S.C.; Granjeiro, J.M.; Calasans-Maia, J.A.; de Uzeda, M.J.P.G.; Mourão, C.F.A.B.; Ghiraldini, B.; Bezerra, F.J.B.; Senna, P.M.; Calasans-Maia, M.D. Osseodensification enables bone healing chambers with improved low-density bone site primary stability: An in vivo study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yu, X.; Chang, C.; Guo, W.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Yu, D. Primary implant stability based on alternative site preparation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2022, 24, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Guglielmotti, M.B.; Olmedo, D.G.; Cabrini, R.L. Research on implants and osseointegration. Periodontology 2019, 79, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bosshardt, D.D.; Chappuis, V.; Buser, D. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: Current knowledge and open questions. Periodontology 2017, 73, 22–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tomar, S.; Saxena, D.; Kaur, N. Marginal bone loss around implants with platform switching and platform matched connection: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2023. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marconcini, S.; Giammarinaro, E.; Covani, U.; Mijiritsky, E.; Vela, X.; Rodríguez, X. The Effect of Tapered Abutments on Marginal Bone Level: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stacchi, C.; Lamazza, L.; Rapani, A.; Troiano, G.; Messina, M.; Antonelli, A.; Giudice, A.; Lombardi, T. Marginal bone changes around platform-switched conical connection implants placed 1 or 2 mm subcrestally: A multicenter crossover randomized controlled trial. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2023, 25, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antonelli, A.; Bennardo, F.; Giudice, A. Breakthroughs in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030685

AMA Style

Antonelli A, Bennardo F, Giudice A. Breakthroughs in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(3):685. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030685

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antonelli, Alessandro, Francesco Bennardo, and Amerigo Giudice. 2024. "Breakthroughs in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 3: 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030685

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop