Next Article in Journal
C-Reactive Protein and Long-Term Prognosis in Adult Patients with Congenital Heart Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Trapeziometacarpal Dislocations in Pediatric Age, Is There a Better Treatment? Series of Cases and a Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Predicting Time to Delivery in Hypertensive Disorders: Assessing PlGF and sFlt-1 with the Novel Parameter ‘Mtp-Multiples of a Normal Term Placenta’
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/jcm13082198
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effect of Physical Activity during Pregnancy on the Risk of Hypertension Disorders and Gestational Diabetes: Evidence Generated by New RCTs and Systematic Reviews

by
Cristina Taliento
1,2,
Irene Piccolotti
1,
Arianna Sabattini
1,
Mara Tormen
1,
Rosaria Cappadona
1,
Pantaleo Greco
1,3,* and
Gennaro Scutiero
1
1
Department of Medical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University Hospital “Sant’Anna”, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
2
Department of Development and Regeneration—Woman and Child, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
3
Department of Medical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 64/B, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2198; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082198
Submission received: 6 February 2024 / Revised: 1 April 2024 / Accepted: 9 April 2024 / Published: 11 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges in High-Risk Pregnancy and Delivery)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are the most common medical complications in pregnancy. Physical exercise is considered to be safe and beneficial during pregnancy. Moreover, pregnancy could be considered as an opportunity for healthcare providers to promote positive lifestyle behavior and optimize the well-being of pregnant women. Since there are few up-to-date reviews evaluating the role of exercise and the risks of developing obstetrical complications, we performed a review to investigate the effects of physical activity and exercise during pregnancy compared to a control group, focusing on the risk of development of HDP and GDM. We searched Medline and Web of Science, including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews. This review supports a beneficial effect of exercise and provides evidence that it significantly decreases the risk of HDP and GDM.

1. Introduction

Several studies have reported the benefits of physical activity and exercise during pregnancy, which include reduced risk of excessive gestational weight gain, decreased risk of gestational diabetes, and preeclampsia [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Evidence also indicates that exercise during pregnancy lowers rates of preterm births and decreases the risk of caesarean section and postpartum length of stay, length of labor, and delivery complications. In addition, physical activity during pregnancy reduces depressive disorders and improves wellbeing. Moreover, it is known to influence the cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy by increasing heart rate, cardiac output, and ventilation [4,5].
After initial hesitation on the part of obstetric care providers, the general acceptance of exercise in pregnancy has grown in the past decade, and recent studies continued to support the notion that exercise during pregnancy is safe for the mother and the fetus [6]. ACOG recommends that in the absence of obstetric or medical contraindications, pregnant women should be encouraged to engage in regular, moderate-intensity physical activity during pregnancy. This also involves educating women about the risks and benefits of exercise during pregnancy and writing an individualized exercise program for each woman [9].
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are two of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. Although exercise during pregnancy is considered to be beneficial and safe for pregnant women, there is limited high-quality evidence in the literature examining the effect of physical activity on mitigating the risk of gestational hypertension and GDM. Moreover, discrepancies between the results of the available studies may be accounted for by differences in study design, study population, and methods for ascertaining exercise characteristics of the study population.
In this narrative literature review, we examine and discuss evidence of the benefits of prenatal activity, generated by new systematic review and counseling, on physical activity during pregnancy, according to the main national guidelines (ACOG 2020, WHO, American College of Sports Medicine), and then we focus on the risk of HDP and GDM in relation to the level of physical activity during pregnancy.

2. Materials and Methods

The search included articles published in the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Keywords used were: ‘physical activity’ OR ‘physical exercise’, ‘pregnancy’ OR ‘gestation’, ‘hypertension disorders’, ‘gestational hypertension’, ‘cardiovascular adaptations’, ‘pre-eclampsia’, ‘gestational diabetes’, ‘physical activity recommendations’ AND ‘pregnancy’.
We included 11 studies published over a period of 18 years (from 2004 to 2022). The characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 1.
No additional statistical processing of the material was conducted.
The aim of this article was to review the current state of knowledge on the effects of physical activity on pregnancy outcomes to promote overall health and fitness during pregnancy.

3. Results

3.1. Physical Activity and Risk of Hypertension Disorders in Pregnancy

HDP represent the major medical challenges, affecting between 10% and 15% of pregnancies worldwide. Every year, around 70,000 mothers and 500,000 babies die because of HDP [10]. The incidence of HDP continues to increase as a result of advanced age at first pregnancy, increased prevalence of obesity, and other cardiometabolic risk factors.
Hypertension is defined as a systolic blood pressure equal or greater than 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure equal to or greater than 90 mmHg [11]. The expression of the disease is mediated through endothelial dysfunction and increased systemic resistance, resulting in hypertension with a highly variable degree of organ dysfunction [12].
HDP can lead to growth restriction, oligohydramnios, placental abruption, preterm birth, and perinatal death. Elevated systolic blood pressures in pregnancy, even when below the threshold for diagnosing gestational hypertension, are also linked to preterm delivery, newborn small for gestational age (SGA), and low birth weight [13]. Furthermore, women with a history of hypertension in pregnancy are also at increased risk for cardiovascular disease later in life [14]. The life expectancy of women who developed preeclampsia during pregnancy is reduced, on average, by 10 years, due to the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. So far, no effective treatment is available other than antihypertensive drugs and termination of pregnancy for the most severe forms [11].
Lifestyle changes before and during pregnancy is considered to be safe and beneficial to pregnant women and may reduce both maternal and fetal risks. Physical activity could play a role in lowering blood pressure and improving cardiovascular fitness in expectant mothers. It may also reduce the risk of preeclampsia, reducing the maternal concentration of oxidative substances and protecting the endothelium from damage from oxidative stress [15]. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends moderate-intensity physical exercise every day or at least three times a week during pregnancy [9]. Malosso et al., in their study, compared pregnant women assigned before 23 weeks to an aerobic exercise regimen with pregnant sedentary women. Women who were randomized in early pregnancy to aerobic exercise (30–60 min 2–7 times a week) had a significantly lower incidence of HDP (5.9% vs. 8.5%; relative risk (RR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.83; seven studies, 2517 participants), specifically, a lower incidence of gestational hypertension (2.5% vs. 4.6%; RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40–0.74), while the incidence of preeclampsia was similar (2.3% vs. 2.8%; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.45–1.38; six studies, 2230 participants). Moreover, the incidence of cesarean delivery was decreased by 16% in the exercise group (19.6% vs. 21.5%; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73–0.98) [16] (Table 2).
In addition, Kawasara et al. studied the effect of physical exercise on the development of preeclampsia. This systematic review included 17 studies: 6 case–control studies, 10 prospective cohort studies, and 1 randomized clinical trial. The case–control studies and the randomized study showed a protective role of exercise on the development of preeclampsia (OR 0.77; CI 0.64–0.91 and OR 6.34; 95% CI 0.72–55.37, respectively), the prospective cohort studies showed no significant difference. Specifically, the analysis of the 6 case–control studies showed that exercise had a protective effect of around 23% on the development of preeclampsia [17] (Table 2). However, Vollebregt et al. conducted a population-based prospective cohort study, which found that playing sports or total leisure time physical activity at a high level did not show any significant association with preeclampsia (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.17–1.10) or gestational hypertension (OR 0.78; CI 0.36–1.69) in nulliparous women [18]. Literature regarding this subject is sometimes conflicting. Studies often use different methods and definitions, which makes it difficult to compare the results. In this study, Vollebregt et al. evaluated the role of exercise in leisure time, while more vigorous activity seems to be associated with a lower incidence of preeclampsia (Table 2).
Al-Huda et al. assessed the cardiorespiratory fitness, measured as VO2 max or peak, VO2 at anaerobic threshold, or work rate at peak VO2. Assuming that exercise has been shown to improve maternal cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), this study showed an important relationship between CRF and risk of hypertension and preeclampsia, suggesting a protective role of exercise. According to the study, CRF can identify women at risk for HDP. Before pregnancy, women who developed hypertension had lower CRF than those without hypertension (VO2 max < 37 vs. >37 mL O2/min). VO2 max at 14–18 weeks of pregnancy was lower among women who developed preeclampsia vs. normotensive women (three studies, 275 women; mean difference 0.43 mL/kg/min [95% CI 0.97–0.10]). In the postpartum group, a similar trend was observed with lower VO2 peak in women with previous preeclampsia (three studies, 208 women; 0.26 mL/kg/min [−0.54, 0.02]) [19] (Table 2). Moreover, Danielli at al. provide information about the most effective ways to exercise. They included data about women performing supervised exercise during pregnancy and compared them to a control group. The likelihood of developing hypertension was notably decreased in the intervention group compared to the control groups, with an estimated pooled cumulative incidence of developing hypertension of 3% in the intervention groups and 5% in the control group (95% CI: 0.40–0.72, p < 0.001). Specifically, engaging in both aerobic and anaerobic exercises or solely practicing yoga was associated with a greater beneficial effect compared with performing aerobic exercise only (mixed-OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33–0.75, p < 0.001; yoga-OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13–0.58, p < 0.001; aerobic exercise only-OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.55–1.37, p < 0.539). This review showed a beneficial role of either structured exercise or yoga [20] (Table 2). Regarding prenatal diet, physical activity, and behavior, Oteg–Ntin et al. found that lifestyle interventions are associated with a trend toward decreased incidence of GDM among overweight and obese populations. However, no clear differences were observed for other outcomes, such as large for gestational age, birth weight, or macrosomia [21].
Furthermore, in a meta-analysis published in 2018, Devenport et al. analyzed evidence from 34 RCTs (9755 participants) regarding the association between prenatal exercise and HDP. The meta-analytic effect indicated 19% lower odds of HDP with exercise compared with no exercise (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65–1.00). Exercise-only interventions reduced the odds of developing HDP by 41% (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.94) [7] (Table 2).

Physical Activity and Risk of Gestational Diabetes and/or Macrosomia

Approximately 2% to 5% of pregnant women are estimated to have pre-existing or GDM, with up to 0.4% of women in the UK and 0.9% of pregnant women in the USA having pre-existing diabetes (type 1 or type 2) [22,23].
GDM manifests as high blood glucose (hyperglycemia) occurring for the first time or being first recognized during pregnancy. The prevalence of GDM ranges from 1% to 14% among pregnant women, with certain groups being at a high risk, such as women who are overweight or obese, older, of specific ethnicities, have had GDM previously, or have a family history of type II diabetes [24]. GDM can lead to significant complications for both mothers and infants including macrosomia, hypoglycemia, erythema, hypocalcemia, jaundice, and birth trauma. Moreover, children are predisposed to obesity, abnormal glucose tolerance, and the onset of diabetes during adolescence or early adulthood, contrasting with offspring of normoglycemic women [25]. Women diagnosed with GDM had higher probabilities of induced labor, cesarean delivery, and preterm birth. Furthermore, there are potential long-term complications for both mothers and infants, including an increased risk of developing type II diabetes [26].
Certain dietary patterns, such as those characterized by low fiber and high glycemic load, along with physical inactivity, represent modifiable risk factors for GDM [27]. Research indicates that lifestyle interventions targeting diet and exercise modifications within the general population have the potential to prevent type II diabetes. It is posited that similar interventions may also contribute to the prevention of GDM during pregnancy.
To date, studies of the influence of physical activity on reducing GDM risk have been inconclusive. In a previous Cochrane review performed by Han et al., results from three RCTs with a moderate risk of bias suggested no significant difference in GDM incidence between women who were physically active during pregnancy [28]. A second Cochrane review by Bain et al., including 13 RCTs, showed that no clear difference was observed in the risk of developing GDM for women receiving a combined diet and exercise intervention compared with women receiving no intervention [27].
In a large prospective RCT including 300 singleton women, patients allocated to the exercise group were assigned to exercise 3 times per week (at least 30 min/session) until 37 weeks of gestation. Wang et al. found that women in the exercise group had significantly lower odds of GDM (22.0% vs. 40.6%; p < 0.001) [29] (Table 3). Consistent with this, Dempsey et al. considered the risk of GDM in relation to typical daily activities performed during the year before pregnancy and during pregnancy [30]. Regular participation in any recreational physical activity during the year before and/or during the first 20 weeks of the index pregnancy was associated with an approximate halving of the risk of GDM in this case-control study; women reporting any activity during this period experienced a 55% reduction in the risk of GDM (OR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.28–0.74). This risk reduction was further increased for women who received an additional exercise intervention during both of these time periods. Indeed, women who engaged in physical activity before and during pregnancy experienced a 69% reduced risk (RR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.12–0.79). Furthermore, the number of hours spent performing recreational activities and the energy expended were related to a decrease in risk of GDM; women spending ≥ 4.2 h/week engaged in physical activity experienced a 76% reduction in GDM risk (RR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.10–0.64). The authors also found that women who climbed stairs, irrespective of their participation in recreational physical activities and pre-pregnancy body mass index, also experienced a reduction in the risk of GDM [30] (Table 3).
Similarly, Doi et al. evaluated the efficacy of physical activity for GDM prevention in high-risk women. The results of this review demonstrated that physical activity programs reduced the risk of GDM (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.51–0.94). The pooled effect across in-facility exercise was (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.37–0.71) [31] (Table 3). In another systematic review and metanalysis, Russo et al. determined a 28% lower risk of GDM among patients assigned to a physical activity intervention compared with those in a control group (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.58–0.91). These results are consistent with findings from observational research [32,33] (Table 3).
In another meta-analysis of 8 cohort studies comprising 72,694 participants, Pastorino et al. concluded that physical activity in late, but not early, pregnancy is consistently associated with a lower risk of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses and macrosomia, but not SGA [34] (Table 3).
The association between prenatal exercise and the risk of developing GDM was also examined in the meta-analysis performed by Devenport et al., which included 46 RCTs (n = 14,923). Although the authors defined the quality of evidence as ‘low’ because of the serious risk of biases, results showed that prenatal exercise was associated with 24% lower odds of developing GDM compared with no exercise (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.65–0.88). Moreover, as discussed previously, a significant difference was observed between sedentary women and active women before pregnancy in terms of the risk of pre-eclampsia [7] (Table 3).

4. Discussion

The benefits of physical activity during pregnancy are receiving more and more interest from the world of research, and the scientific literature on the subject is constantly increasing. Evidence has emerged suggesting that physical activity from the first trimester decreases the odds of GDM, pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and excessive gestational weight gain [9].
HDP and GDM are the most frequent obstetric disorders during pregnancy. These clinical conditions are characterized by similar risk factors, such as obesity, insulin resistance, advanced maternal age, and excessive gestational weight gain [35]. Moreover, in [36], they were found to share similar pathophysiological mechanisms that included inflammation, vascular dysfunction, oxidative stress, and vascular disease.
In this regard, recent studies underline the role of physical activity on angiogenesis [37]. Morland et al., studying the benefits of exercise on brain health, identified the lactate receptor HCAR1 as a key regulator of VEGF and angiogenesis in the brain in response to physical activity. In support of the role of exercise in the prevention of diabetes and hypertension through endothelial protection, Piani et al., in their systematic review, highlight the role of new susceptibility genes such as cluster of differentiation (CD) 93 in the pathogenesis of vascular damage, which has been shown to underlie hypertensive and metabolic disorders [38]. In a clinical setting, the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study found positive associations between increasing plasma glucose levels and the incidence of preeclampsia [25]. Similarly, in a retrospective study including 1813 patients, results showed that pregestational BMI (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.16–2.30) and severity of GDM (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.21–2.38) were independently and significantly associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia [39].
Thus, although many studies have documented a strong association between maternal BMI, pre-eclampsia, and GDM, the physiopathological aspect underlying these conditions is not yet fully understood [40,41,42]. Proinflammatory cytokines have been pointed out as among the factors that could support that link. Many studies showed that adipose tissue releases adipokines that, by inducing proinflammatory cytokines (leptin, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α), generated an inflammatory environment that is considered a partial causative factor in the pathogenesis of several metabolic, inflammatory, and neoplastic diseases [43]. The anti-inflammatory cytokines (adiponectin, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, and perhaps IL-6) attenuate inflammation by restricting cytokine production, up-regulating their antagonist-binding proteins, and suppressing inflammatory activity. Satoh et al. first demonstrated that abnormalities in the leptin-to-adiponectin ratio were observed in patients diagnosed with impaired glucose tolerance and hypertension [44].
A nested case–control study that included 198 GDM cases and 192 controls showed that women with GDM had a higher baseline leptin concentration compared to those without GDM [45]. Consistent with these results, another study demonstrated that plasma leptin was higher (p < 0.001) in women with GDM than in women with normal glucose tolerance [46].
A similar correlation was observed between high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and pre-eclampsia. Taylor et al., in a large study including 746 pregnant women, found that leptin concentrations were significantly higher in women with preeclampsia (p = 0.0117) and term preeclampsia (p = 0.0228) compared with controls [47]. Moreover, many studies showed how higher levels of leptin were found in the placentas of women with GDM and hypertension disorders.
In the literature, there is growing evidence that exercise increases secretion of anti-inflammatory adipokines and reduces proinflammatory cytokines [48,49,50]. The GESTAFIT Project aimed to analyze the influence of an exercise-training program on inflammatory markers in maternal venous and arterial and venous cord serum. The exercise group followed a 60 min 3 days/week aerobic-resistance exercise training from the 17th gestational week to delivery. Results showed that in the exercise group, there was a statistically significant decrease in TNF-α concentrations (p = 0.02) compared to the control group. Moreover, the exercise group was associated with a significant increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β (p = 0.03) and IL-10 (p = 0.05) compared to the control group [51].
In the absence of specific complications, ACOG, Canadian guidelines, and RCOG encouraged, during pregnancy, types of physical activity that are now notoriously safe during pregnancy, such as stationary cycling, aerobic exercises, dancing, resistance exercises, stretching, hydrotherapy, and water aerobics [9,52,53].
Several new systematic reviews (SRs) evaluated the association between physical activity and HDP, GDM, or birth size. The presence of SRs on the subject, characterized by the robustness of the methodology, allows for a more accurate level of evidence, and increases the impact of the studies on clinical practice. Moreover, meta-analysis methodologies allow the pooling of results across studies. However, not all the SRs have the same characteristics; some included only RCTs (Magro–Malosso, 2017; Danielli, 2022; Bain, 2015; Suhail, 2020; Cai, 2020), while others also included observational studies, providing a lower level of evidence (Kasawara, 2012; Al-Huda, 2022; Russo, 2015; Pastorino, 2018).
Furthermore, only one systematic review (Suhail, 2020) evaluated the certainty of the evidence with the GRADE method, as recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Higgins]. One of the principal limitations cited by the systematic review is that the primary studies varied in duration, frequency, type, and length of exercise programs, as well as among the methods used to assess physical activity, including the diagnostic thresholds for GDM. The same heterogeneity is retrieved in the prevalence of confounding factors, such as smoking, employment, parity, BMI, and history of prior GDM. Additionally, some of the primary studies were based on self-reported physical activity, with the possibility of recall biases, and not all questionnaires used were validated. In conclusion, our review confirms the need for further studies of high methodological quality on the subject, with more structured and standardized physical activity programs, to better compare the results between the studies. In addition, there is a need to obtain more data stratified for the various comorbidities of the patients, for the intensity of physical activity, and for the different types of physical exercise.

5. Conclusions

Physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of GDM and PE, representing a milestone for the prevention of these pregnancy complications.
Exercise during pregnancy has a protective effect against HDP by influencing the pathogenetic mechanisms and acting on associated risk factors. An adequate diet and engagement in physical activity also influence modifiable risk factors for GDM. In addition, a balanced diet and adequate physical activity are associated with a reduction in the incidence of type II diabetes mellitus.
Physicians should encourage women to adopt a more active lifestyle during pregnancy. Additionally, it is advisable for women with an elevated BMI to maintain a balanced diet in the preconception period as well as sustain a good level of physical activity during pregnancy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.G. and C.T.; methodology, C.T., A.S., I.P. and M.T.; software, C.T. and M.T.; validation, G.S., P.G. and R.C.; formal analysis, C.T.; investigation, C.T., I.P. and A.S.; resources, M.T.; data curation, C.T., M.T., I.P. and A.S.; writing—original draft preparation C.T., I.P. and A.S.; writing—review and editing, M.T.; visualization, M.T. and P.G.; supervision, G.S. and P.G.; project administration, P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Artal, R.; Sherman, C. Exercise during pregnancy: Safe and beneficial for most. Phys. Sportsmed. 1999, 27, 51–52, 54, 57–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Veille, J.C. Maternal and fetal cardiovascular response to exercise during pregnancy. Semin. Perinatol. 1996, 20, 250–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pivarnik, J.M. Cardiovascular responses to aerobic exercise during pregnancy and postpartum. Semin. Perinatol. 1996, 20, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jaque-Fortunato, S.V.; Wiswell, R.A.; Khodiguian, N.; Artal, R. A comparison of the ventilatory responses to exercise in pregnant, postpartum, and nonpregnant women. Semin. Perinatol. 1996, 20, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Soultanakis, H.N.; Artal, R.; Wiswell, R.A. Prolonged exercise in pregnancy: Glucose homeostasis, ventilatory and cardiovascular responses. Semin. Perinatol. 1996, 20, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Davenport, M.H.; Kathol, A.J.; Mottola, M.F.; Skow, R.J.; Meah, V.L.; Poitras, V.J.; Garcia, A.J.; Gray, C.E.; Barrowman, N.; Riske, L.; et al. Prenatal exercise is not associated with fetal mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018; Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Davenport, M.H.; Ruchat, S.M.; Poitras, V.J.; Garcia, A.J.; Gray, C.E.; Barrowman, N.; Skow, R.J.; Meah, V.L.; Riske, L.; Sobierajski, F.; et al. Prenatal exercise for the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 1367–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sibai, B.M.; Ross, M.G. Hypertension in gestational diabetes mellitus: Pathophysiology and long-term consequences. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010, 23, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 804. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 135, e178–e188. [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, W.; Xie, X.; Yuan, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, F.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, H. Epidemiological trends of maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at the global, regional, and national levels: A population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brown, M.A.; Magee, L.A.; Kenny, L.C.; Karumanchi, S.A.; McCarthy, F.P.; Saito, S.; Hall, D.R.; Warren, C.E.; Adoyi, G.; Ishaku, S.; et al. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: ISSHP Classification, Diagnosis, and Management Recommendations for International Practice. Hypertension 2018, 72, 24–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jung, E.; Romero, R.; Yeo, L.; Gomez-Lopez, N.; Chaemsaithong, P.; Jaovisidha, A.; Gotsch, F.; Erez, O. The etiology of preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 226, S844–S866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wong, T.Y.; Groen, H.; Faas, M.M.; van Pampus, M.G. Clinical risk factors for gestational hypertensive disorders in pregnant women at high risk for developing preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2013, 3, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Stuart, J.J.; Tanz, L.J.; Rimm, E.B.; Spiegelman, D.; Missmer, S.A.; Mukamal, K.J.; Rexrode, K.M.; Rich-Edwards, J.W. Cardiovascular Risk Factors Mediate the Long-Term Maternal Risk Associated With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022, 79, 1901–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Barakat, R.; Pelaez, M.; Cordero, Y.; Perales, M.; Lopez, C.; Coteron, J.; Mottola, M.F. Exercise during pregnancy protects against hypertension and macrosomia: Randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 649.e1–649.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Magro-Malosso, E.R.; Saccone, G.; Di Tommaso, M.; Roman, A.; Berghella, V. Exercise during pregnancy and risk of gestational hypertensive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2017, 96, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kasawara, K.T.; do Nascimento, S.L.; Costa, M.L.; Surita, F.G.; e Silva, J.L. Exercise and physical activity in the prevention of pre-eclampsia: Systematic review. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2012, 91, 1147–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vollebregt, K.C.; Wolf, H.; Boer, K.; van der Wal, M.F.; Vrijkotte, T.G.; Bonsel, G.J. Does physical activity in leisure time early in pregnancy reduce the incidence of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension? Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2010, 89, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al-Huda, F.; Shapiro, G.D.; Davenport, M.H.; Bertagnolli, M.; Dayan, N. Association between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Danielli, M.; Gillies, C.; Thomas, R.C.; Melford, S.E.; Baker, P.N.; Yates, T.; Khunti, K.; Tan, B.K. Effects of Supervised Exercise on the Development of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oteng-Ntim, E.; Varma, R.; Croker, H.; Poston, L.; Doyle, P. Lifestyle interventions for overweight and obese pregnant women to improve pregnancy outcome: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2012, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, K.W.; Ching, S.M.; Ramachandran, V.; Yee, A.; Hoo, F.K.; Chia, Y.C.; Wan Sulaiman, W.A.; Suppiah, S.; Mohamed, M.H.; Veettil, S.K. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cho, N.H.; Shaw, J.E.; Karuranga, S.; Huang, Y.; da Rocha Fernandes, J.D.; Ohlrogge, A.W.; Malanda, B.I.D.F. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 138, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lapolla, A.; Metzger, B.E. The post-HAPO situation with gestational diabetes: The bright and dark sides. Acta Diabetol. 2018, 55, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group; Metzger, B.E.; Lowe, L.P.; Dyer, A.R.; McIntyre, H.D.; Oats, J.J.; Persson, B.; Rogers, M.S.; Sacks, D.A. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 1991–2002. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Nayak, P.K.; Mitra, S.; Sahoo, J.P.; Daniel, M.; Mathew, A.; Padma, A. Feto-maternal outcomes in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2013, 7, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bain, E.; Crane, M.; Tieu, J.; Han, S.; Crowther, C.A.; Middleton, P. Diet and exercise interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, CD010443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, S.; Middleton, P.; Crowther, C.A. Exercise for pregnant women for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 7, CD009021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, C.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Sun, Y.; Su, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, C.; Feng, Y.; et al. A randomized clinical trial of exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus and improve pregnancy outcome in overweight and obese pregnant women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dempsey, J.C.; Sorensen, T.K.; Williams, M.A.; Lee, I.M.; Miller, R.S.; Dashow, E.E.; Luthy, D.A. Prospective study of gestational diabetes mellitus risk in relation to maternal recreational physical activity before and during pregnancy. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2004, 159, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Doi, S.A.; Furuya-Kanamori, L.; Toft, E.; Musa, O.A.; Mohamed, A.M.; Clark, J.; Thalib, L. Physical activity in pregnancy prevents gestational diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 168, 108371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Russo, L.M.; Nobles, C.; Ertel, K.A.; Chasan-Taber, L.; Whitcomb, B.W. Physical Activity Interventions in Pregnancy and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 125, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tobias, D.K.; Zhang, C.; van Dam, R.M.; Bowers, K.; Hu, F.B. Physical Activity Before and During Pregnancy and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pastorino, S.; Bishop, T.; Crozier, S.R.; Granström, C.; Kordas, K.; Küpers, L.K.; O’Brien, E.C.; Polanska, K.; Sauder, K.A.; Zafarmand, M.H.; et al. Associations between maternal physical activity in early and late pregnancy and offspring birth size: Remote federated individual level meta-analysis from eight cohort studies. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 126, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jiang, L.; Tang, K.; Magee, L.A.; von Dadelszen, P.; Ekeroma, A.; Li, X.; Zhang, E.; Bhutta, Z.A. A global view of hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022, 18, 760–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Plows, J.F.; Stanley, J.L.; Baker, P.N.; Reynolds, C.M.; Vickers, M.H. The Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Morland, C.; Andersson, K.A.; Haugen, Ø.P.; Hadzic, A.; Kleppa, L.; Gille, A.; Rinholm, J.E.; Palibrk, V.; Diget, E.H.; Kennedy, L.H.; et al. Exercise induces cerebral VEGF and angiogenesis via the lactate receptor HCAR1. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Piani, F.; Tossetta, G.; Cara-Fuentes, G.; Agnoletti, D.; Marzioni, D.; Borghi, C. Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of CD93 in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yogev, Y.; Xenakis, E.M.; Langer, O. The association between preeclampsia and the severity of gestational diabetes: The impact of glycemic control. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 191, 1655–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Miehle, K.; Stepan, H.; Fasshauer, M. Leptin, adiponectin and other adipokines in gestational diabetes mellitus and pre-eclampsia. Clin. Endocrinol. 2012, 76, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pérez-Pérez, A.; Maymó, J.L.; Gambino, Y.P.; Guadix, P.; Dueñas, J.L.; Varone, C.L.; Sánchez-Margalet, V. Activated translation signaling in placenta from pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: Possible role of leptin. Horm. Metab. Res. 2013, 45, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kautzky-Willer, A.; Pacini, G.; Tura, A.; Bieglmayer, C.; Schneider, B.; Ludvik, B.; Prager, R.; Waldhäusl, W. Increased plasma leptin in gestational diabetes. Diabetologia 2001, 44, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fantuzzi, G. Adipose tissue, adipokines, and inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005, 115, 911–919; quiz 920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Satoh, N.; Naruse, M.; Usui, T.; Tagami, T.; Suganami, T.; Yamada, K.; Kuzuya, H.; Shimatsu, A.; Ogawa, Y. Leptin-to-adiponectin ratio as a potential atherogenic index in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2004, 27, 2488–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xiao, W.Q.; He, J.R.; Shen, S.Y.; Lu, J.H.; Kuang, Y.S.; Wei, X.L.; Qiu, X. Maternal circulating leptin profile during pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 161, 108041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Golbidi, S.; Laher, I. Exercise induced adipokine changes and the metabolic syndrome. J. Diabetes Res. 2014, 2014, 726861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Taylor, B.D.; Ness, R.B.; Olsen, J.; Hougaard, D.M.; Skogstrand, K.; Roberts, J.M.; Haggerty, C.L. Serum leptin measured in early pregnancy is higher in women with preeclampsia compared with normotensive pregnant women. Hypertension 2015, 65, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moldoveanu, A.I.; Shephard, R.J.; Shek, P.N. The cytokine response to physical activity and training. Sports Med. 2001, 31, 115–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Northoff, H.; Weinstock, C.; Berg, A. The cytokine response to strenuous exercise. Int. J. Sports Med. 1994, 15, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ostrowski, K.; Rohde, T.; Asp, S.; Schjerling, P.; Pedersen, B.K. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine balance in strenuous exercise in humans. J. Physiol. 1999, 515, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Acosta-Manzano, P.; Coll-Risco, I.; Van Poppel, M.N.M.; Segura-Jiménez, V.; Femia, P.; Romero-Gallardo, L.; Borges-Cosic, M.; Díaz-Castro, J.; Moreno-Fernández, J.; Ochoa-Herrera, J.J.; et al. Influence of a Concurrent Exercise Training Intervention during Pregnancy on Maternal and Arterial and Venous Cord Serum Cytokines: The GESTAFIT Project. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mottola, M.F.; Davenport, M.H.; Ruchat, S.M.; Davies, G.A.; Poitras, V.J.; Gray, C.E.; Jaramillo Garcia, A.; Barrowman, N.; Adamo, K.B.; Duggan, M.; et al. 2019 Canadian guideline for physical activity throughout pregnancy. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 1339–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Atkinson, L.; Parsons, J.; Jackson, B.R. Exercise in pregnancy—UK women’s views and experiences: Results of an online survey. Pregnancy Hypertens 2014, 4, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Articles included in the search.
Table 1. Articles included in the search.
Author
Year		Study DesignSample SizeTime Period
Magro-
Malosso,
2017		Meta-analysis5075 patientsFrom the inception of each database to February 2017
Kasawara,
2012		Systematic review231 articles, 214 of which were excluded, 17 remained.No limitation to year of publication (up to June 2011)
Vollebregt,
2010		Prospective cohort study3679 nulliparous womenBetween January 2003 and March 2004
Al-Huda,
2022		Systematic review and meta analysis14 studies (2406 women)No date restriction was applied
Danielli,
2022		Systematic review and meta analysis16 randomized controlled trialsFrom the inception of each database to November 2021
Devenport,
2018		Systematic review and meta analysis46 randomized controlled trialsBetween 2002 and 2017
Wang,
2017		Randomized clinical trial300 womenBetween December 2014 and July 2016
Dempsey,
2004 		Prospective cohort study909 women Between April 1998 and February 2001
Doi,
2020		Meta-analysis1467 adult women in 11 eligible trialsAfter 1996 till June 2020
Russo,
2015		Systematic review and meta-analysis10 randomized studiesBetween 1966 and August 2014
Pastorino,
2019		Individual level meta-analysis8 population-based studies comprising 72694 participants.No date restriction was applied
Table 2. Physical activity and risk of hypertension disorders in pregnancy.
Table 2. Physical activity and risk of hypertension disorders in pregnancy.
Author
Year		Study DesignSample SizeInterventionResult
Magro-
Malosso,
2017		Meta-analysis5075 patients30–60 min of aerobic exercise two to seven times per week until at least week 35 or up to delivery Women who were randomized in early pregnancy to aerobic exercise for about 30–60 min two to seven times per week had a significantly lower incidence of gestational hypertension and cesarean delivery.
Kasawara,
2012		Systematic review231 articles, 214 of which were excluded, 17 remained.PA as any voluntary bodily movement that increased energy expenditure above the basal levelThis systematic review indicates a trend toward a protective effect of physical activity in the prevention of pre-eclampsia.
Vollebregt,
2010		Prospective cohort study3679 nulliparous womenPhysical activity in leisure time in the past week Playing sports or total leisure time physical activities at a high level lacked a significant association with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension
Al-Huda,
2022		Systematic review and meta analysis14 studies (2406 women)CRF (VO2 max or peak, VO2 at anaerobic threshold, or work rate at peak VO2) in women with and without HDP.The study showed an important relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of HDP.
Danielli,
2022		Systematic review and meta analysis16 randomized controlled trialsSupervised exercise during pregnancyBeneficial effect of either structured exercise or yoga for preventing the onset of HDP.
Devenport,
2018		Systematic review and meta analysis46 randomized controlled trialsPrenatal physical exercise Lower odds of gestational hypertension in the exercise group
Table 3. Physical activity and risk of gestational diabetes and/or macrosomia.
Table 3. Physical activity and risk of gestational diabetes and/or macrosomia.
Author
Year		Study DesignSample SizeInterventionResult
Wang,
2017		Randomized clinical trial 300 womenRegular exercise in early pregnancy to prevent GDM Cycling exercise initiated early in pregnancy and performed at least 30 min, 3 times per week, is associated with a significant reduction in the frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus in overweight/obese pregnant women
Dempsey,
2004		Prospective cohort study909 womenRecreational physical activity before and during pregnancyMaternal physical activity may contribute to substantial reductions in GDM risk. This advantage is greater for more intense physical activities.
Doi,
2020		Meta analysis1467 adult women in 11 eligible trialsPhysical activity in women at high risk before the 20th week of gestationPhysical activity reduced the risk of GDM compared with usual care.
Russo,
2015		Systematic review and meta analysis10 randomized studiesGroup or individual exercise interventionsReduced risk of developing GDM in the intervention group compared with the control group.
Pastorino,
2019		Individual level meta-analysis8 population-based studies comprising 72694 participants.Maternal physical activity in early and late pregnancyLate gestation maternal physical activity was inversely associated with birth weight, large for gestational age, macrosomia, and ponderal index.
Devenport,
2018		Systematic review and meta analysis46 randomized controlled trialsPrenatal physical exercise Lower odds of developing GDM in the exercise group.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Taliento, C.; Piccolotti, I.; Sabattini, A.; Tormen, M.; Cappadona, R.; Greco, P.; Scutiero, G. Effect of Physical Activity during Pregnancy on the Risk of Hypertension Disorders and Gestational Diabetes: Evidence Generated by New RCTs and Systematic Reviews. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 2198. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082198

AMA Style

Taliento C, Piccolotti I, Sabattini A, Tormen M, Cappadona R, Greco P, Scutiero G. Effect of Physical Activity during Pregnancy on the Risk of Hypertension Disorders and Gestational Diabetes: Evidence Generated by New RCTs and Systematic Reviews. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(8):2198. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082198

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taliento, Cristina, Irene Piccolotti, Arianna Sabattini, Mara Tormen, Rosaria Cappadona, Pantaleo Greco, and Gennaro Scutiero. 2024. "Effect of Physical Activity during Pregnancy on the Risk of Hypertension Disorders and Gestational Diabetes: Evidence Generated by New RCTs and Systematic Reviews" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 8: 2198. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082198

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop