Next Article in Journal
Rationale and Design of the Future Optimal Research and Care Evaluation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (FORCE-ACS) Registry: Towards “Personalized Medicine” in Daily Clinical Practice
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Netarsudil on Actin-Driven Cellular Functions in Normal and Glaucomatous Trabecular Meshwork Cells: A Live Imaging Study
Previous Article in Journal
SOS Teeth: First Priority Teeth with Advanced Caries and Its Associations with Metabolic Syndrome among a National Representative Sample of Young and Middle-Aged Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging of White Matter Degeneration in Glaucoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Neuroinflammation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

by
Stefania Vernazza
1,*,†,
Sara Tirendi
2,3,†,
Anna Maria Bassi
2,3,†,
Carlo Enrico Traverso
4,5,† and
Sergio Claudio Saccà
5,†
1
IRCCS-Fondazione Bietti, via Livenza 3, 00198 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
3
Inter-University Center for the Promotion of the 3Rs Principles in Teaching & Research (Centro 3R), Italy
4
Clinica Oculistica, DiNOGMI, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
5
Ophthalmology Unit, IRCCS-Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, 16132 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(10), 3172; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103172
Submission received: 28 August 2020 / Revised: 24 September 2020 / Accepted: 28 September 2020 / Published: 30 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Update on Glaucoma: Pathogenesis and Treatment)

Abstract

:
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the second leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Increasing evidence suggests oxidative damage and immune response defects are key factors contributing to glaucoma onset. Indeed, both the failure of the trabecular meshwork tissue in the conventional outflow pathway and the neuroinflammation process, which drives the neurodegeneration, seem to be linked to the age-related over-production of free radicals (i.e., mitochondrial dysfunction) and to oxidative stress-linked immunostimulatory signaling. Several previous studies have described a wide range of oxidative stress-related makers which are found in glaucomatous patients, including low levels of antioxidant defences, dysfunction/activation of glial cells, the activation of the NF-κB pathway and the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and so on. However, the intraocular pressure is still currently the only risk factor modifiable by medication or glaucoma surgery. This present review aims to summarize the multiple cellular processes, which promote different risk factors in glaucoma including aging, oxidative stress, trabecular meshwork defects, glial activation response, neurodegenerative insults, and the altered regulation of immune response.

1. Introduction

Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by the progressive loss of the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), visual field reduction and characteristic changes in the optic nerve head (ONH) [1].
However, among the glaucoma types, primary open angle (POAG) is the most common.
At present, POAG etiology, due to its multifactorial nature, is still unknown but several risk factors have been indicated as the causes of promoting its onset, namely, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), aging, sex, ethnicity, first-degree family history of glaucoma, oxidative stress, systemic and ocular vascular factors, and autoimmunity [1,2,3,4]. Moreover, the combination of multiple risk factors is able to increase the susceptibility to glaucoma development and its severity [5].
Two main hypotheses are proposed, in order to explain the glaucoma pathogenesis: The mechanical and the vascular theories of glaucoma.
The mechanical theory argues that the IOP elevation, either at the lamina cribrosa or the optic nerve head (ONH) level, lead initially to hypoperfusion and then reperfusion damage [6]. Therefore, IOP elevation is considered a direct or indirect cause of RGC damage, which results in a retrograde transport blockade and the accumulation of neurotrophic factors at the lamina cribrosa instead of reaching the RGC soma. In addition to growth factor starvation, mitochondrial damage and glial cell activation, as well as oxidative stress, play an important role in promoting RGC apoptosis [7,8].
The vascular theory is based on evidence of either primary (vasospastic syndrome) or secondary vascular dysregulation found in some glaucomatous patients. The chronic impairment of ONH blood flow, which may result from an imbalance in the ocular blood flow auto-regulation and oxidative stress (vasospastic syndrome) or from systemic levels of vasoconstrictive peptides (i.e., endothelin-1), seems to be responsible for ischaemia-reperfusion nerve injury [9,10,11].
However, Saccà et al. [12] proposed a further theory in order to explain the missing link between the malfunctioning of TM cells, the IOP elevation and the loss of RGCs. In fact, the previous theories do not mention the role played by TM tissue alteration in the glaucoma cascade context.
The alterations in the protein patterns found in the aqueous humor (AH) of POAG patients is the consequence of the progressive loss of TM cellular integrity [13,14]. Thus, these TM-derived proteins can affect both the retina and ONH behavior in the posterior segment of the eye, acting as pro-apoptotic signals for RGCs and their axons in the ONH (Figure 1). Although, it is not yet clear which of these are precisely involved in the trigger of RGC apoptosis, it is highly likely that the TM over-produced proteins, such as nestin, could represent the key molecules for glia activation or other detrimental mechanisms [12].
POAG can occur with both a normal (i.e., 15–20 mmHg) or high IOP. The first one is also known as Normal-Tension Glaucoma (NTG), while the second is called High-Tension Glaucoma (HTG). In NTG, the higher rate of hemodynamic crisis, the low systemic blood pressure, and the low ophthalmic blood pressure [15] are all thought to promote early ONH damage. However, the specific causes involved in NTG have not been discussed in this review.
Instead, in HTG, the causes are undoubtedly associated with TM damage and an increased IOP.
As alrady known, the AH passes from the posterior chamber to the anterior chamber of the eye through two AH drainage systems, also known as the conventional and unconventional pathways of outflow [16]. Several oxidative stress-induced biochemical signals and chronic mechanical strain lead to a wide range of intracellular and extracellular morphogenic changes in the TM structure which affect its flexibility in terms of the excessive ECM deposition, the inhibition of the metalloproteinesases activity, cytoskeleton rearrangement, and so on [17]. The moment these pathological changes become chronic, there is an increase in the irreversible drainage resistance and in the elevated IOP, both of which are charateristic of HTG.
However, through different mechanisms, both NTG and HTG are responsible for the neurodegenerative process, which begins with the early harmful responses borne by the ONH [18,19].
As far as we know, IOP remains the only modifiable risk factor (with medication or glaucoma surgery) in both types, even though it is not enough to stop RGC loss [20,21].
Several mechanisms have been suggested to promote glaucoma neurological injury, including the imbalance between neuroinflammatory and neuroprotective mediations, as well as the neurotoxicity meditated by glutamate, nitrogen oxide (NO) and oxidative stress [18,22,23,24,25].
This review summarizes many of the studies that have contributed to understanding the involvement of the TM in HTG and the pathological events underlying both, TM dysfunction and the POAG neurodegeneration process.

2. Methods

A systematic search of Pub Med (MEDLINE) was conducted up to and including the first part of 2020 for the preparation of this review.
Articles dealing with the pathogenetic aspects of Glaucoma, eye disease, oxidative damage and inflammation were carefully selected and reviewed. The search terms used included word combinations such as “POAG AND risk factor” (409 results); ‘‘Inflammation AND eye” (3553 results); ‘‘Neurodegeneration AND glaucoma’’(387 results); “Glaucoma AND pathogenesis AND oxidative stress‘‘ (132 results); ‘‘Nfkb AND glaucoma pathogenesis AND Nrf2” (1 result); “trabecular meshwork AND POAG” (281 results); “Neuroinflammation AND POAG” (5 results); and “long non-coding RNA AND POAG” (10 results). All abstracts were then attentively read and, if the subject was compatible with our article, the paper was reviewed in detail. This article, being a review, did not necessitate the approval from the IRCCS San Martino University Hospital (IST) Ethics Committee.

3. Oxidative Stress and Mitochondria Dysfunction

The increase in physiological values in the intracellular concentrations of ROS gives rise to an oxidative stress condition which can directly damage proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. ROS are partially-reduced metabolites of molecular oxygen including superoxide anion (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydrogen radical (OH), peroxyl radical (ROO), and singlet oxygen (1O2) and they can derive from both endogenous and exogenous sources.
With aging, there is a reduction in the antioxidant network functions, which results both in oxidative damage accumulation to the cells and tissues, and a higher susceptibility to morbidity and mortality [26,27].
Mitochondria have been thought to contribute to aging through the accumulation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). As known, human mtDNA encodes 13 polypeptide components of the respiratory chain, as well as the rRNAs and tRNAs which are necessary to support intramitochondrial protein synthesis. Therefore, both inherited mutations and somatic mtDNA mutations acquired during aging (i.e., deletions and point mutations), could contribute to several diseases including those neurodegenerative [24,25,28,29]. It has been shown that mitochondria-derived ROS may be produced by the mitochondrial matrix enzymes, the α-keto acid dehydrogenase complexes, the mitochondrial electron transport chain [30], as well as by the loss of mitochondria ability in buffering Ca2+ [31]. The loss of this function leads to Ca2+-overloaded mitochondria with a consequent formation of permeability transition pores. The opening of the permeability transition pores increases H2O2 production by a specific conformational change of complex I and, probably, also by the inhibition of the electron pathway within it, resulting in cell death via apoptosis or necrosis [32,33].
Therefore, the increase in oxidative stress (OS) total share is associated with several chronic diseases, including those associated with the eye (i.e., glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy and ischemic optic neuropathy) [34,35]. In particular, in POAG, the accumulation of excessive ROS can induce the trabecular meshwork damage, which results in conventional outflow pathway defects [36,37,38] and exacerbates the injury, both to the optic nerve head (ONH) and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) [18].
In this section, the main damage induced by OS, which starts and promotes the “glaucomatous cascade”, is reported.

3.1. Oxidative Stress-Related Trabecular Meshwork Damage

The TM is the most sensitive tissue of the anterior segment of the eye to OS [39]. In the TM of glaucoma patients, significant levels of 8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) [24], HSP27 and glutamine synthetase [40,41] have been found, indicating that the active oxidative agents (i.e., H2O2 and O2−), contained in the AH [42], were not counteracted by an adequate antioxidant defense system [43]. Moreover, both the serum and AH analysis of glaucomatous patients revealed a decrease in the total antioxidant defences [44]. In particular, Bagnis et al. [45] have reported a significant reduction in antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione S-transferase-1 enzymes, and an increase in pro-oxidant ones, including nitric oxide synthase and glutamine synthase.
In addition, a prolonged OS condition is able to induce severe irreversible damage, such as cell death, extracellular matrix accumulation, and trabecular fusion, compromising TM functions [46,47,48,49,50]. Furthermore, the accumulation of the products of lipid peroxidation (LPO) participates in the destruction of the main tissues involved in the conventional outflow pathway [51].
The morphological analysis of glaucomatous human TM cells showed POAG-typical molecular changes, including ECM accumulation, cell death, disarrangement of the cytoskeleton, advanced senescence, NF-κB activation and the release of inflammatory markers [49,50,52]. These findings suggest that the IOP elevation, which occurs in glaucomatous patients, is related to oxidative degenerative processes affecting the human TM endothelial cells (hTMEs). Indeed, in such TM cells, ROS damage is more evident because it reduces local antioxidant activities which results in an increase of outflow resistance and in an exacerbation both of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activities [53].
Furthermore, in POAG patients, mitochondrial abnormalities, such as mtDNA changes and a decrease in the mitochondrial respiratory activity are constant features, rather than gene mutations (e.g., MYOC and OPTN), which in most cases are benign [54]. Therefore, oxidative stress and a wide range of mitochondrial abnormalities (i.e., respiratory function decline, accumulation of mtDNA mutations and mitochondrial loss) are the main risk factors in POAG [29,55].
Chronic exposure of TM cells to oxidative stress induces several changes in the lysosomial system, which is responsible for autophagia [56], as well as cell senescence with an increase in senescence-associated-β-galactosidase [57]. In fact, oxidative stress conditions lead to lysosomal basification and the defective proteolytic activation of lysosomal enzymes with a subsequent decrease in autophagic flux and the promotion of cell senescence [12,58]. The senescence, in turn, contributes to the loss of tissue function [59] through several phenotypic changes able to alter the tissue microenvironment and to promote pathological alterations associated with aging [60]. The most important alteration found in senescent cells is the presence of a secretory phenotype, also known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which contributes to tissue malfunction [61]. SASP in senescent TM cells, in fact, promotes the release of both inflammatory mediators and growth factors, affecting the function of adjacent cells, leading to a chronic activation of a stress response [62].
In addition to the senescent process, also endoplasmic reticulum (ER) defects contribute to OS-related TM damage due to its inability to take action in response to unfolded or misfolded proteins [63]. As known, ER, in order to maintain cell homeostasis, acts as the site of both the synthesis and modification of secretory proteins prior to their delivery to other secretory organelles. However, under chronic stress conditions, defects in either protein folding or defects within the ER can occur, resulting in the misfolding of specific proteins or a malfunctioning within specific ER resident proteins that are linked with several pathological states [64]. Moreover, ER stress may activate the cellular inflammatory pathway via NF-κB, induce mitochondrial changes and trigger cell apoptosis [65,66].
Saccà et al. [12] have speculated that the TM damage is responsible for both IOP elevation, which is considered an epiphenomenon, reflecting the loss of the healthy state of trabecular cells, and for the likely activation of glial cells and NMDA/AMPA receptors, through TM-derived proteins [13], in the posterior chamber of the eye [12].

3.2. Oxidative Stress and Neural Damage

The brain is particularly susceptible to the damaging affects of ROS, which may be due to the high O2 uptake needed for ATP production. Large amounts of ATP are required, in order to maintain neuronal intracellular ion homoeostasis through the opening and closing of ion channels, which are involved in the action of potential propagation and neurosecretion [67].
As already known, the aging process is intrinsically linked to the decline of the cells’ ability to respond to oxidative damage. Therefore, the reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, produced by endogenous metabolic pathways, tend to accumulate in aging neurons rather than be effectively counteracted by the antioxidant systems [68].
In this regard, several previous studies have demonstrated that different neurodegenerations have common features, such as the ROS over-production, the interruption of mitochondrial function, and the failure in either the O2 supply or in the substrates for energy production [69,70,71].
In particular, the extensive damage, promoted by high Ca2+ traffic across the neuronal membranes and/or disruption of the ATP supply, high levels of lipid peroxidation, as well as protein carbonyl content, make up the basis for neurodegeneration onset and neuronal apoptosis [26,31,67].
Oxidative injury, enhanced by aging, is considered the engine of the glaucoma degenerative process and above all, the combination of both the glaucoma-derived and aging-related oxidative stress accelerate the degenerative process. The accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), for instance, were found in the glaucomatous retina and optic nerve head [72]. Moreover, also age-related alterations, such as the glial extracellular matrix production at the optic nerve head level [73], the microglia deterioration, the cytokine and chemokine profiles, and so on, increase susceptibility to glaucomatous damage [74,75].
Glaucoma also has immunogenic aspects; in fact, oxidative stress-related events may alter the immune response regulation in different ways. The oxidative-induced modifications in proteins [26], lipids and DNA may activate an immunostimulatory signal to resident immune cells. In aging retina, glial cells and, in particular, the microglia are able to initiate an innate immune response [76] after inflammatory stimuli from oxidized proteins, lipids, and DNA. Therefore, low levels of oxidative stress products are effectively removed by microglial scavenger functions while the high level ones induce an over-activated state of microglia which results in an increased production of pro-inflammatory molecules (i.e., TNFα, NF-κB, nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2) [77,78,79].
In addition, Tezel et al. [80] found that oxidative stress has a pathogenic role also in the retinal complement regulation. Indeed, it down-regulates the expression of complement factor H (CFH), a complement-regulatory protein which, under physiological conditions, prevents massive cell lysis and inflammation, leading to an increased vulnerability of adjacent neurons to complement-mediated injury.
Furthermore, oxidative stress induces many downstream pathways to be triggered, which can also compromise blood barrier functions [81].
The vascular insufficiency found in some glaucoma patients is one of the possible causes that leads to low perfusion pressure, compromising ocular blood flow auto-regulation [69]. Therefore, the alterations in the blood flow modulation, which occur at the inner retina and at the superficial portion of the ONH, contribute to the reperfusion injury and ROS over-production [19].
The tissue hypoxia condition can develop secondary to, or independent of, an elevated IOP [18]. Under physiological conditions, an alteration in O2 homeostasis is quickly regulated by the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) because it acts as a hypoxia sensor though the transcription of a broad variety of genes (i.e., VEGF, iNOS, and HOMOX1) whose protein products are able to increase O2 delivery or facilitate the metabolic adaptation to hypoxia [82]. In glaucomatous eyes, sustained hypoxic insult or recurrent episodes of tissue hypoxia promote an increase in stressed tissue level, characterized by hypoxia, ROS generation, glial activity, immune system involvement, and/or other mechanisms yet to be identified.
In addition, oxidative stress continues to play a pivotal role in the later stage of glaucoma.
At the ONH level, the presence of nitrotyrosine (NT), also known as “the footprint of oxidative injury” [83,84], induces post-translational changes to nuclear, cytoplasmic or mitochondrial proteins [85,86,87]. In RGCs, oxidative stress is considered responsible for the presence of proteins that undergo proteolytic cleavage or exhibit post-translational modifications [88].

3.3. AH Composition in POAG Patients

The AH composition changes depending on the metabolites produced during its generation and those acquired from different anterior segment regions during its passage. Several factors may contribute to modifying these metabolites, including the time of collection, severity of the disease, body temperature and IOP fluctuations [89]. However, a constant pattern is emerging from AH analysis of glaucomatous patients in terms of significant differences in protein profiles and antioxidant defence content [90].
The increase in both endothelin 1 (ET-1) levels and NO found in AH, but not in the plasma of POAG patients [91], is probably due to the NO attempt to counteract the local agent’s activity of ET-1, thus, increasing the outflow facility of AH through NO/cyclic guanosine monophosphate [92].
Moreover, also the levels of hydroxyproline, derived from the hydrolysis of collagen [93] and acetate [94], the latter correlating with the changes in outflow dynamics, due to either cell loss or the dysfunction of sub-cellular structures, increase in POAG AH.
Both the levels of the transforming growth factor beta 2 (TGFβ2) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are elevated in POAG patients [95,96,97]. Furthermore, the increase in prostaglandin H2 D-isomerase (PGDS) transthyretin (TTR) and caspase 14 in POAG AH seem to be involved in TM apoptosis [98].
However, the proteomic AH profile of POAG patients is completely altered compared to the healthy one. Indeed, the protein alterations detected in the glaucomatous patients were involved in the main glaucomatous pathogenic pathways, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial alterations, apoptosis, tissue disaggregation, and neuronal damage [13]. In particular, the presence of proteins, such as chains, junction proteins and cadherins which under physiological conditions contribute to tissue integrity, are the litmus test of both TM and RGC damage [99,100].

4. The NF-κB Pathway

Nuclear factor KB (NF-κB) is one of the ubiquitous transcription factors, which play a crucial role mainly in the innate immune response. Therefore, in response to a wide range of pathogenic signals, it acts in a way to induce rapid post-translational activation, participating in cytoplasmic/nuclear signaling and regulating the gene transcriptions, which encode immunologically-relevant proteins (i.e., pro-inflammatory cytokines and secondary inflammatory mediators) [101]. Although at first, NF-κB activity has been described only in murine B lymphocytes, it has now been recognized as an important mammalian transcription factor, whose activity is regulated by the redox state of cells. In particular, the cytokines IL1β and TNFα are considered the triggers for the NF-κB signaling via their respective receptors, as well as by ligands of TLRs and certain growth factor-receptor tyrosine kinases [102,103]. Actually, the term “NF-κB” can be confusing because it is used to not only refer to the NF-κB superfamily, but also to the NF-κB subfamily and to the specific heterodimer (i.e., p50-RelA). Therefore, the NF-κB superfamily is distinguished in NF-κB proteins (p105 and p100), and Rel proteins (c-Rel, RelB, RelA/p65) [104], both sharing the Rel homology domain (RHD), a highly-conserved DNA-binding/dimerization domain. However, the members of the NF-κB subfamily are distinguished by long C-terminal domains that contain multiple copies of ankyrin repeats, which are able to inhibit Rel proteins, while the Rel subfamily contains C-terminal transactivation domains, which can activate gene transcription [105,106]. The members of the NF-κB subfamily activate the transcription only when they form dimers with the Rel subfamily members. In particular, before forming heterodimers with Rel proteins, both p100 and p105 undergo limited proteolysis which generates p52, and p50, respectively.
In the absence of stimuli, NF-κB activity is tightly regulated by the interaction with inhibitory IkB proteins in the cytoplasm. In addition, IkB proteins include several members such as IkBα, IkBβ, IkBγ and IkBε with different affinities for individual NF-κB dimers. These interactions allow the NF-κB signaling to be negatively controlled, masking both the signal of nuclear localization in the NF-κB dimer and the sequences involved in DNA binding [107].
However, after an intense stressful stimulus, two main pathways, namely, the canonical and the non-canonical, lead to the activation of NF-κB. The canonical pathway is the more common one of the two. It is mainly activated by pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., TNFa, IL-1b, IL-6, CD40L), DNA-damaging agents (camptothecin and daunomycin), Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists and/or viruses (HTLV1, EBV) [108,109]. These stimuli, in turn, play an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [110,111,112].
Nevertheless, both pathways provide for the activation of an IkB kinase (IKK) complex consisting of the catalytic kinase subunits (IKKα and/or IKKβ), the protein NEMO (NF-κB essential modulator) and the heat shock proteins Hsp90/Cdc37 [113]. Therefore, specific phosphorylation on the IkB inhibitor determine its degradation by the 26S proteosome [114,115].

4.1. Cross-Talk among NF-κB and NRF2

NF-E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) is an important redox-sensitive transcription factor with cytoprotective role. Its activation provides for the antioxidant gene transcriptions such as NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) [116,117], heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) [118,119], glutathione S-transferase (GST), glutamate-cysteine ligase -GCS), glutathione reductase, SOD1 [120] and gluthatione peroxidase [121], by binding to the antioxidant response element (ARE) region.
Under physiological conditions, the NRF2 activity is regulated by its repressor Keap1 (Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1) at a cytoplasmatic level [122]. Keap1 is associated with an adaptor component of Cul3 (Cullin3)-based ubiquitin E3 ligase complex which constantly leads to the NRF2 ubiquitination and degradation as long as it remains in an inactivated state [123,124]. However, the activation of NRF2 is also controlled at a nuclear level by Bach1 and the members of SrcA chinase (Src, Fyn, Yes e Fgr), which prevent both its transcriptional activity and its nuclear accumulation [125].
Indeed, the phosphorilation of NRF2 on specific tyrosine residues allows for the release of NRF2 from its repressor, leading to an ARE-mediated cellular anti-oxidant response [126].
In response to OS, NRF2 is accumulated within the nucleus and heterodimerizes with Maf small protein in order to improve its binding to ARE [122]. As the nuclear activity of NRF2 ends, it is pushed out from the nucleus and it returns under the control of its inhibitors Keap1, Bach1 and SrcA chinasi [126].
A bulk of evidence has demonstrated that anti-inflammatory, anti-tumoral and phytochemical products suppress the NF-κB pathway in favor of NRF2 signaling [127,128,129] and that the MPK family modulates these mutual activation/inactivation mechanisms [130]. ROS intracellular levels are considered the molecular sensor of these above-mentioned pathways: Low levels of ROS induce the anti-oxidant gene transactivations, related to the NRF2 pathway whilst medium levels are responsible for the activation of NF-κB signaling and high levels lead to apoptosis or necrosis, due to the alteration in the mitochondrial permeability [131].
Several molecules are seen to promote NRF2 activation. Among these, for example, the protective role of Cyclo (His-Pro) [132], has been demonstrated in a cellular rat pheocromocytoma model (PC12) in which it counteracted the paraquat toxicity via NRF2 pathway activation. Therefore, the NRF2-related anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory enzymes have down-regulated the detriment of the NF-κB pathway (Figure 2).

4.2. NF-κB and TM

Chronic OS-related sub-lethal injury is involved in the pathogenesis of different diseases including atherosclerosis, glomerulonephritis, pulmonary fibrosis [133] and POAG [62]. Both ROS and NOS trigger a cascade of events that can result in cellular damage. In particular, high levels of ROS may be responsible for increased levels of nitric oxide (NO) and, consequently, for reactive peroxonitrite (ONOO-) formation [134].
The role of NO is well-known in both physiological conditions, in which it regulates the IOP and the ocular flow blood, and in POAG conditions, in which it is dis-regulated [135,136]. In response to inflammatory stimuli, the NF-κB activation [137] leads to the expression of the isoform Ca2+-independent of NO synthase (iNOS), which is an enzyme belonging to the oxidoreductases. iNOS, in turn, promotes the synthesis of NO from oxygen and arginine [138]. However, due to the pro-oxidant environment, an increase in both oxygen and nitrogen reactive species occurs, which is responsible for cellular damage, such as lipid peroxidation and MDA formation [139,140]. Moreover, iNOS over-expression can contribute to TM cell damage, and this also takes part in the OS-related cascade of events which lead to POAG [141].
There is a close relationship between the NF-κB up-regulation and the increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine production [18,142]. Indeed, in glaucoma, the NF-κB pathway regulates the glia-driven inflammatory response, the cytokine and toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling, as well as the inflammasome [143,144,145]. ROS stimulates the NF-κB activation leading to the expression of a wide range of pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α), which amplify the intensity of the inflammation response [146]. Moreover, in glaucomatous TM cells, endogenous IL-1 induces ELAM-1 and a pro-inflammatory cytokine expression via NF-κB [62].
As already known, NF-κB behaves as a damped oscillator able to synchronize itself after external stimuli with no memory [147]. Therefore, initially, the expressions of ELAM-1 and IL-1/IL-6 are very low. However, chronic NF-κB pathway stimulation boosts ELAM-1 and cytokine expressions [62,148,149,150].
NF-κB prevents cell apoptosis through the expression of genes encoding anti-apoptotic proteins [49,50,151]. TM cells from glaucomatous patients counteract the apoptotic response after oxidative stress treatment because they endogenously produce IL-1, which activates NF-κB [62]. In addition, the NF-κB activation in the early stage of glaucoma could increase the outflow facility [152], thus, promoting the matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) expressions [49,153].

5. Trabecular Meshwork (TM) and Location of Outflow Resistance

The aqueous humor (AH), once secreted by the ciliary body (CB) and/or its non-pigmented epithelium, leaves the anterior eye chamber either through the conventional pathway, which involves the TM, or the uveoscleral pathway, which involves the CB [154]. In particular, the conventional pathway is recognized as being sensitive to the eye pressure because the passage of the AH is driven only by a pressure gradient [155]. Although, there is an individual susceptibility to IOP variations, both under physiological and pathological conditions, the conventional pathway has been studied for several decades due to its crucial role in glaucoma.
The Trabecular Meshwork (TM) is the anterior part of the conventional outflow pathway, located in the anterior chamber of the eye, which mainly pregulates the IOP in aqueous humor (AH) outflow and filters the AH.
TM is a part of a complex system consisting of several components, including the Schlemm’s canal (SC), as well as the collector channels/aqueous veins. Therefore, the AH flows out through both the TM, which is the first barrier to the aqueous humor outflow, and the SC, which instead, represents the second barrier to reach the aqueous channels [42,156].
All these parts work together to maintain the IOP within a physiological range [16,157], mainly due to cellular mechano-sensory systems, mechano-transduction mechanisms, cytoskeletal responses and finely-regulated signaling pathways, as well as the interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM) [158].
Anatomically, the TM is formed by connective tissue beams (lamellae) which apparently makes it look like a filter structure. Their cores consist of elastic and collagen fibers while outwardly they are covered by flat cells backed on to a basal lamina [159]. Such a particular morphology of the TM cell system increases the cell numbers exposed to the AH [14] because the latter can pass through, either the cell junctions or through TM cells that have changed their shape [160,161].
However, a non-filtering TM portion, also named the “insert region”, which is close to the Schwalbe line, exists, which probably serves as a niche for cells with adult stem-cell/progenitor properties capable of re-populating the filtering part of the TM after injury [162,163].
The filtering portion of the TM consists of three regions with different structures: The inner uveal meshwork (UTM), the deeper corneoscleral meshwork (CTM), and the juxtacanalicular tissue (JCT), also known as the endothelial meshwork or the cribriform region, which is localized adjacent to the inner wall endothelium of SC.
The cells of the first two portions have a macrophage-like activity that allows for the cleaning of the AH from pigment epithelia-derived cellular debris, ROS or waste material before reaching the JCT region [163,164]. These regions protect the inner TM from these accumulations, which could interfere with resistance generation and regulation. A defective macrophage activity could be responsible for secondary form glaucoma [165].
The JCT region is defined as the point of contact between the TM endothelial cells and the SC endothelial cells (SCE) and it is also considered the crucial point for “extra” resistance in glaucomatous eyes.
The release of chemokines and cytokines by the TM endothelial cells increases the SCE permeability [156].
Moreover, also the extracellular matrix (ECM) is involved in outflow resistance. Indeed, the ECM, found in the JCT region, in addition to the ECM proteins, contains matricellular proteins, such as thrombospondin-1 [166,167] and SPARC [168,169], which influence the cell function through cell-matrix interactions. Therefore, ECM homeostasis maintainance is important to avoid both the cytoskeletal manipulations of TM or SC cells and the effect on active flow pathways [170].
Therefore, the conventional outflow pathway is endowed with two specialized endothelial cell barriers, namely, the TME and SCE, that allow it to perform two important functions: (1) Drives the AH from the anterior chamber of the eye into the SC lumen in order to facilitate its egress; and (2) prevents the reflux of blood from the venous circulation into the anterior chamber [42]. These two barriers are attached to each other through long cell processes and they facilitate the aqueous outflow with cell-to-cell interaction mechanisms [171]. In addition, the endothelium-lined vessel of SC is distinguished in an inner and an outer wall in which endothelial cells differ for cell-specific marker expressions [172].
TME act as a control on the SCE permeability by releasing vasoactive cytokines and other factors while the SCE form ‘‘giant vacuoles’’ only when the IOP exceeds the pressure in the episcleral venous plexus. Nevertheless, the outflow resistance seems to result mainly both from a synergistic interaction through the cell-to-cell junctions between the SCE in the inner wall, their basement membrane and/or the TEM [158,173]. The endothelial cells in the inner wall, in turn, undergo a basal-apical pressure gradient due to the biomechanical micro-environment. As mentioned above, the cell’s inner walls can also be considered as an ultrastructure provided with giant vacuoles and pores, as well as F-actin arrangements (i.e., peripheral F-actin bands) [173].
Giant vacuoles, as well as intracellular and paracellular pores, are probably involved in the AH outflow resistance regulation [174]. Giant vacuoles create a small potential space between the ECM and the inner wall. Although, they appear within the cells, they are not actually intracellular structures as they derive from inner wall deformations due to the transcellular pressure drop across the cells. The wall of these invaginations is very thin but only at the point where it is at its thinnest does the intracellular pore formation occur (the so-called I-pores) [175]. Both the I-pores and the paracellular pores (B-pores), present on the inner wall of SC, contribute to the “funnelling” which is the point of the AH outflow exit. However, an increase in SC rigidity could prevent the giant vacuole formation, inhibiting I-pore formation and resulting in an IOP elevation [173,176]. In fact, in glaucomatous eyes, a significant reduction of I and B pores were found [177,178,179].
Therefore, the AH outflow resistance involves the entire JCT region due to either molecular changes in the TM and in its ECM composition, or to focal regions of collapse and luminal decrease within the SC, resulting in an IOP increase [180,181]. Furthermore, a chronic IOP elevation found in the HTG also leads to histopathological changes, such as a decreased SC cross-sectional area, perimeter or length. These changes result in further implications at the outer wall level such as the collapse and narrowing of collector channels (CCs), the adhesion of SCE to CC orifice walls and the blockage of CC orifices owing to the JCT herniation [182,183].

5.1. Local Mediators in Conventional Outflow Pathway

In the conventional outflow pathway, the resident cells use both autocrine and paracrine mediators to regulate the outflow resistance, whether positively or negatively, namely lipid-derived cytokines, nucleotides and gases [170].
Among the lipid-derived cytokines, the prostaglandin E2 and prostaglandin/prostamide F2a act by increasing the outflow facility in binding themselves to EP(4) or FP receptors. Therefore, the prostaglandin (PG) F2α analogs are widely used in glaucoma treatment, even though their acute and long-term effects influence both the cell behavior in the conventional pathway and the ECM turnover [184,185,186,187,188,189]. In addition, also lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine-1-phosphate act on the AH outflow but contrary to previously stated, they decrease the outflow facility [190,191].
Cytokine secretions, such as interleukins (IL), interferons (IFN), colony-stimulating factors (CSF), chemokines, tumor necrosis factors (TNF), and growth factors, are implicated, either in local inflammatory processes or in non-immune functions (i.e., angiogenesis and development). However, POAG is characterized by immune activation with changes in cytokine profiles [192]. Previous studies have reported that the levels of the transforming growth factor-β2 (TGF-β2), a cytokine which may mediate the fibrotic process, were significantly increased in the AH of glaucoma patients [170,193]. In fact, in in-vitro models of human TM cells, it has been shown that the increase of TGF-β2 is responsible for an increase in the extracellular matrix deposition [194]. In addition, the increase in the oxidative stress-induced TGF-β2 activates transglutaminase 2, a ubiquitously-expressed enzyme which catalyzes irreversible post-translational modifications of proteins, forming cross-linked protein aggregates [195].
T-helper (Th) cells are considered as the main source both of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. However, to better understand their function, their classification needs to be simplified. Thus, it has been considered that Th1 cells are responsible for pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-12, IL-23, and TNF-alpha while Th2 cells for the production of IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10. In fact, some studies showed that the balance of Th1/Th2 cytokines plays an important role in the damage or protection of RGCs [196,197]. In addition, other results carried out on in-vitro human TM models has revealed that long-term exposure to oxidative stress increased the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines [198], which are responsible for TM damage and the decrease in outflow facility. Moreover, some of these cytokines secreted by TM, such as TNFα and IL-1, act in a synergistic relationship to enhance the effects of the MMP3 expression, in order to improve the TM functions [199]. Therefore, the high concentrations of IL-9, IL-12, IFN-α, IFN-γ, CXCL9 and IL-10 found in POAG AH [200] would suggest that abnormal immune environments contribute to the degeneration found in POAG.
Small signaling molecules, such as nucleotides and nitric oxide (NO), have a role in modifying the conventional outflow. For instance, one of the cellular mechanisms which is responsible for regulating the outflow resistance is represented by TM cells and their ability to remodel the ECM. Therefore, ATP released by the TM can be converted to adenosine and then bind itself to the A1 adenosine receptors (ARs) which modulate the release of MMP2 [201,202]. Otherwise, another ATP-dependent mechanism to promote the outflow facility could derive from the binding between the TM-released ATP and the ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP) [203].
Furthermore, the endothelial cells of the TM, which are small vessels, are regulated by both NO and ET-1 and are capable of phagocytosis and ECM production, as well as transducing signals after the stress-induced protein kinase C (PKC) attaches to the ECM [204,205,206,207].
Therefore, NO acts on the outflow facility by decreasing volume, contractility and/or cell-to-cell junction assembly in conventional outflow cells [170]. In particular, the TM cell volume reduction increases the intertrabecular spaces, which results in a greater cell exposure to AH [134]. In this regard, postmortem glaucomatous human eye investigations have suggested that the physiological role of NO in IOP-regulation is altered [208]. Wienderholt et al. [209] showed that the inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) causes the contraction of both the TM and ciliary muscle in-vitro.
ET-1, unlike NO, acts by inducing the TM contraction and increasing the outflow resistance. Both, NO and ET-1 activities regulate each other with negative feed-back mechanisms.
Moreover, ET-1 induces vasoconstriction also in other parts of the eye’s anterior segment and the consequent decrease in the ocular blood flow may contribute to the RGC degeneration [134,210].

5.2. The Main Changes in POAG TM

TM, as described above, is one of the main tissues involved in the conventional outflow pathway. In two forms of glaucoma, namely, HTG and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), it is responsible for IOP elevation. In PACG, unlike HTG, the IOP increase results from the TM occlusion induced by the iris tissue, not directly from TM defects [43]. However, the chronic contact between the iris and the TM can cause permanent damage to the TM.
Therefore, TM dysfunction (i.e., defect on its endothelial cells) and the reduction of its cellularity are considered the first step to the HTG onset.
Several factors, such as oxidative stress, aging and genetic change, as well as environmental and endogenous factors are indicated as promoting TM damage. However, among the factors involved in such damage, oxidative stress is considered as the main one due to the evidence provided by both, animal and human studies [99].
In addition, oxidative stress could be involved in the morphological and biochemical alterations of the TM of glaucomatous eyes, due mainly to it activating both inflammatory and immune responses. In fact, chronic inflammation and oxidative stress mutually influence each other, giving rise to a vicious circle which, in turn, influences the cellular responses.
In normal TM, the mRNA for IL-1α was undetectable while the mRNAs for IL-1β and IL-6 were found only at low levels. Cultures of human TM showed that after an exogenous stimulation such as IL1 or H2O2, the NF-κB pathway activation occurs, which results in a significant expression of the endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1 (ELAM-1), IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-6 [50,62]. ELAM-1 belongs to selectin families, which are cell adhesion molecules. Such protein is produced after 2–4 h of cytokine induction and is crucial because it mediates the leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion. The presence of ELAM-1 in POAG AH is considered a marker for the onset of TM endothelial dysfunction [211].
Under normal conditions, TM is prone to triggering apoptosis if the oxidant threshold is overcome. Conversely, under glaucomatous conditions, TM cells exhibit a resistance to the oxidant probably due to their endougenous IL-1 production. Therefore, it is assumed that, in these cells, the NF-κB activation, through IL-1, in spite of the chronic inflammatory activation, could promote cell survival. However, during glaucoma, a progressive loss of TM cells has been observed, thus, it is reasonable to assume that both aging and stress conditions at the basis of this disease, are over time responsible for TM cell death [99].
In HTG, the TM displays both chronic inflammation and tissue remodeling processes which are related to oxidative stress damage and endothelial dysfunction. Alvarado et al. [42] demonstrated that, after laser irradiation, both pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL1α, ILβ, IL8 and TNFα) and the monocytes in TME increase the permeability of SCE in order to regulate the outflow of the aqueous humor across the conventional outflow pathway. However, on one hand, the monocytes recruitment, from the blood circulation to the TM tissue, is part of a physiological mechanism sustained by the constitutive chemokines (i.e., MCP1) expressed by TM itself, on the other, the inflammatory cytokines are not and, in fact, were found either in glaucomatous human TM cells (i.e., TNFα, cIFN, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-7, IL-12) [212,213] or in porcine/human TM cells subjected both to chronic oxidative [214] and mechanical stress [215]. Among the pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL6, IL1β and TNFα, can induce ECM remodeling and alter cytoskeletal interactions in the glaucomatous TM.
In addition to inflammatory cytokines, also TGF-β signalling regulates the ECM turnover [216] in a pathological way. It takes part in the Extracellular Matrix Organization pathway [217] inducing elastin and collagen cross-linking enzymes, which are associated with the pathological ECM changes. In particular, TGF-β1, in cultured TM cells, is recognized as inducing the expression of smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), thus, also influencing the TM actin cytoskeleton with the cell-ECM alteration [218].
Furthermore, an altered or inhibited activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are described in the POAG trabecular meshwork [219,220,221]. Under physiological conditions, MMPs are involved both in ECM turnover and cytoskeleton re-organization [222,223]. Their activity is positively regulated by PAF and/or several members of the metalloproteinase family and negatively by the tissue inhibitors of metalloprotienases (TIMPs).
In SC and JCT of POAG eyes, for instance, the up-regulation of both MMPs (e.g., MMP1 and 3) and TIMPs has been found to probably be due to the MMP’s attempt to ECM remodelling being simultaneously counteracted by the TIMP activity [224]. Moreover, an up-regulation of MMPs also both during chronic exposure to H2O2 and post-mechanical stretching has been described [163,220,223,225].
The TM undergoes structural changes mainly due to the up-regulation of collagen, fibronectin and elastin, as well as the inhibition of MMP activities resulting in excessive ECM depositions [20,163,226,227]. Moreover, also changes, both in the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) composition [46] and in the matricellular protein expressions (i.e., SPARC and Tenascin C), occur [168,226,228]. All these modifications result in an increased resistance of the AH outflow. The increased resistance to outflow, in turn, results in IOP elevation, also known as the main feature of HTG.
The gap junctions in the TM play a specific role in maintaining cell-to-cell communication and allows for the passage of molecules and the electrical signal propagations [229]. The subunits, which include gap junctions, are the connexins which are integral membrane proteins. In order to form the gap junctions, one connexon hemichannel, formed by six connexins, has to bond to another connexon hemichannel present on an adjacent cell [230,231]. The mechanical stretch in HTMCs up-regulates connexin43 (Cx43) and its isoform. However, recently, also Cx26 and/or Cx31 have been suggested as being involved in an increased intercellular signalling related to the altered TM [231].

5.3. LncRNA-miRNA-mRNA: Role inTM and in POAG

It has been reported that long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), a RNA molecule that is not translated into a protein, could have a critical role in POAG development [232]. Indeed, lncRNA has the ability to regulate the gene expression (i.e., transcriptional interference, transcriptional activation, and chromatin modification) through its participation in the transcription regulation and gene translations. Although, the mechanisms and functions of most lncRNAs remain unclear, it has been suggested that a cross-regulation between microRNAs (miRNAs) and lncRNAs exist, which is able to favor, either the repression or expression of target mRNAs.
The mutual influence between lncRNA and miRNA is rapidly emerging and, therefore, it can act as a mRNA regulator in several manners: specific miRNAs can interact with lncRNA, in order to reduce its stability, lncRNAs may seize miRNAs favoring the expression of the repressed target mRNAs or can derepress the gene expression by competing with the miRNAs for the shared target interaction or even, some lncRNAs can produce miRNAs themselves [233].
For example, the lncRNA, in the anti- direction of the INK locus, single-nucleotide polymorphisms in CDKN2BAS1, has been associated with an increased risk of both POAG onset and optic nerve degeneration, probably due to its influence on the TGFβ signaling pathway or on the regulation in neighboring gene expressions [234,235,236].
In glaucomatous AH, three lnRNAs, such as T267384, ENST00000607393, and T342877, that can be useful for POAG diagnosis, have been identified [237]. Interestingly, ENST00000607393 has been proposed as a new therapeutic target because of its involvement in TM calcification.
Furthermore, in an experimental model of the TM, subjected to oxidative stress, the protective role of lncRNA ANRIL has been demonstrated. Indeed, it promotes the cell survival though the down-regulation of miR-7 expression and the activation of the mTOR and MEK/ERK pathways [238].
Recently, a specific category of lncRNA, named competing endogenous (ce)RNAs, has also been recognized in POAG. (ce)RNAs are able to seize miRNAs, due to the presence of similar miRNA target sequences, and consequently, to favor the expression of target mRNAs, which under normal conditions, would have been repressed by these miRNA [232]. This is probably due to the alteration of post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of the gene expressions [239,240,241].
In POAG, differentially-expressed mRNAs were also found due to the above-mentioned (ce)RNA activity, especially for ubiquitin-like protein ligase, the MAPK signaling pathway [242,243], the endocytosis pathway, and the Wnt signaling pathway [244,245].
In addition, OIP5-AS1, which is an anti-sense lncRNA, was able to compete with several miRNAs, for example with hsa-miR-17-5p, hsa-miR-20b-5p, hsa-miR-761, hsa-miR-3619-5p, hsa-miR-24-3p, mir-27a and so on, and regulates the gene expressions [232]. Among these miRNAs, miR-27a, for instance, exerts a protective role on HTM cells under H2O2 administration [246]. Another miRNA target of OIP5-AS1, which is also involved in glaucoma, is miR-17-5p. In HTM cells, this miRNA has a role in regulating the proliferation and apoptosis in response to oxidative stress [247]. However, in POAG, the interaction between these miRNAs and OIP5-AS1 can inhibit their protective role, thus promoting cell degeneration.
Therefore, a better understanding of this novel RNA crosstalk will lead to a significant insight into the gene regulatory networks underlying TM damage and all the tissues involved in glaucoma degeneration.

6. Neurodegeneration in POAG

Glaucoma is no longer considered a simple eye condition, but rather an optic neuropathy, characterized by a progressive degenerative disorder of the central nervous system (CNS). This knowledge comes from the fact that both retina and optic projection are part of the CNS [248,249].
In clinical practice, intraocular pressure (IOP) remains the only modifiable risk factor, although it is not always increased in this disease [22]. In this regard, at present, most of the results from glaucomatous neurodegeneration derive from induced or natural-occurred glaucoma animal models [250]. However, with regards to the glaucomatous neurodegeneration onset and its progression it is incorrect to make an etiological distinction about the presence or the absence of ocular hypertension. In fact, it is more accurate to consider this glaucoma outcome as a consequence of both age-related stressors and as a neurological sensitivity to pressure, regardless of its magnitude [251]. As a matter of fact, this neurodegeneration in addition to IOP, is equally favored by other concomitant factors including the increase in glutamate levels, oxidative stress, mitochondria dysfunction and low grade inflammation [252,253,254].
Moreover, neurodegeneration found in Glaucoma involves epidemiological features and mechanisms similar to that in other conditions such as Alzheimer’s (AD), Parkinson’s (PD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), and Huntington’s disease. Indeed, despite having different etiologies, they show the same degenerative pattern (i.e., degeneration borne by axon, dendrites and cell bodies) and the specific dysregulation of Ca2+-dependent processes [31].
In particular, it has been reported that similarities exist between Glaucoma and AD in terms of the mechanisms involved in the apoptosis process of RGCs and AD cells. For example, in both conditions, β-Amyloid deposits and increased levels of tau proteins were found [255,256].
Therefore, the glaucoma neurodegenerative condition, which initially starts with axon degeneration and the loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), later affects the intracranial optic nerves and the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), which is the first major vision center located deep within the brain, as well as in the visual cortex [257,258,259].
Although, not all molecular mechanisms that drive RGC death are known, it is hypothesized that RGC death could result from neurotrophic signals deprivation due to the blocking of axonal transport deriving from either disturbances in mitochondrial dynamics, which lead to apoptosis, or in the reactive oxygen species (ROS). In particular, the latter are able to act as secondary messengers and/or to modulate the protein function through the redox modifications of downstream effectors [260,261]. Therefore, the protein modifications by redox reactions increase the neuronal susceptibility to damage and glial dysfunction.
However, regardless of the causes underlying RGC death, it is assumed that for each RGC, there is one LGN neuron. Therefore, degeneration at the visual cortex level is only detectable after a loss of at least 50% of RGC [262]. Indeed, a postmortem analysis performed on LGN tissues from both glaucomatous and healthy brains showed that only in glaucomatous brains was there a reduced mitochondrial activity and a shrinkage of neurons with smaller nuclei. Moreover, in the three LGN major visual channels, which are the magnocellular, parvocellular and koniocellular pathways, a significant neural degeneration and the presence of globoid cytoplasm both in the magnocellular and parvocellular neurons and a neurochemical alteration in the koniocellular neuron were observed. In addition, a reduced cortex ribbon thickness under the calcarine sulcus and an atrophy of optic nerve tissue were found [258,263].

6.1. Axonal Transport Deficit

The initial site of damage in glaucoma is at the level of the lamina cribrosa in the ONH, probably due to the axonal damage that involves a retrograde degeneration with consequent loss of the RGC somas [264]. Indeed, ONH impairment induces the mechanical blockade of the axoplasmic flow and the retrograde transport of pro-survival factors related to it, from the brain-located RGC synaptic terminal to the cell body.
Axonal transport from cell soma to distal axon and vice versa regulates neuron homeostasis. Anterograde axonal transport is driven by kinesin and is responsible for providing both proteins and lipids of new synthesis to the distal synapse, whenever they are required and for mitochondria movement when a local energy shortage occurs.
Retrograde axonal transport is driven by dynein and it allows for both the exchange of intracellular signals over long distances and the removal of misfolded and aggregated proteins from the axon [265,266]. Moreover, the RGCs of healthy eyes receive neurotrophic factor supplies, including, for instance, the neurotrophin family of growth factors (e.g., BDNF and NGF) and the receptors to which they bind (Trk and p75NTR) both, from this transport and from the retinal Müller glia [267,268]. Therefore, it is not surprising that axonal transport defects together with the stress-signaling propagation along the axon, promote neuron decline.
Two assumptions are broadly accepted when explaining what leads to a retrograde transport defect. One assumption, agrees with considering the ONH as the point of disruption after a mechanical strain of chronic IOP increase whereas, the other indicates high trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference responsible for the axonal damage, due to the abnormally-low cerebrospinal fluid pressure [269]. Studies carried out on rodent glaucoma models, which lack a true lamina cribrosa, showed a disrupted axonal transport at the ONH as well, suggesting that these damage mechanisms may be independent of the laminar structure [6].
Furthermore, also the trigger of astrocyte and microglia reactivity by the ONH seems to induce changes in lamina cribrosa extracellular matrix composition and oligodendrocyte death [270,271,272].
In addition, point mutations or small deletions in dynein heavy chain, which are the molecular motor complexes that generate force towards the minus end of microtubules, are involved in defects in retrograde axonal transport [273].
The anterograde axonal transport defect starts from the distal portion of the RGC projection out of the ONH and occurs earlier compared to that of the retrograde axonal transport one [274]. In particular, defects in kinesin-mediated anterograde transport could lead to synaptic defects and axonal decay due to an inadequate supply of new proteins and lipids from the soma to the distal synapse [273].

6.2. Microglial Activation

Microglia, together with astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, constitute the glia in the CNS. Microglia, in particular, are represented by cells with small cell bodies and ramified thin, spiny processes that surround the blood vessels and maintain a close relationship with the blood-brain barrier. Moreover, microglia are also found in the walls of large vessels and around the glial columns and cribriform plates of the lamina cribrosa.
In the CNS, it is unlikely they participate in the vegetative maintenance of the neurons but behave as macrophage-like cells and immune surveillance cells [275]. Therefore, they are able to react to neural damage, thus further spreading the neuroinflammation process, through mechanisms which include morphological changes (amoeboid morphology), proliferation, migration and the production of inflammatory cytokines [276]. Indeed, the microglia activation enhances the neurotoxic effects by the increase in both ROS and NO levels, the release of TNFα and interleukin 6 (IL-6), and the increase in the expression of the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) and II antigens [277,278,279,280,281].
Several previous studies have highlighted the role of TGFβ1 in regulating microglia activation and its reactivity either under basal conditions or after inflammatory stimuli [282,283,284]. In fact, brain analysis carried out on adult TGFβ1-null mice revealed an uncontrolled astroglial activation, an increase in microglia proliferation with a reduced branching of their cellular processes and strong inflammatory marker expressions (e.g., CD44) [285]. However, in animal models with neurodegeneration, despite displaying an increase in TGFβ1 amounts and their receptors, a sustained microglial activation, accompanied by neurotoxic molecule secretions, was found [286]. Interestingly, data from in vivo analysis revealed that the age-related cytotoxic microglial activation and the concomitant decrease in TGFβ1 signaling, is seen to promote the neurodegeneration [287].
The activation of microglia can occur after either endogenous or exogenous stimuli that are damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which include heat shock proteins (Hsp), hyaluronan, uric acid, galectins, thioredoxin (TRX), adenosine triphosphate (ATP), high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), IL-1α and IL-33, or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as molecules released from pathogens [288,289,290,291,292].
DAMPs and PAMPs are recognized by specific microglial surface receptors i.e., Toll-like receptors (TLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), RIG-like receptors (RLRs), AIM2-like receptors (ALRs), and C-type lectins. The activation of these receptors gives rise to the so-called inflammasome, an important molecular regulator of the inflammatory process. The activation and the assembly of the inflammasome induce the maturation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β and IL-18, promoting inflammation. In particular, the pro-inflammatory potential of IL-1β promotes the activation and the up-regulation of other key components of the inflammatory process, including VEGF [293], ICAM-1 [294], IL-8, CXC chemokine receptor 2 [295] and so on, which by activating neutrophils, facilitate their entry into the cornea. Moreover, the release of activated cytokines, together with the activation of caspase-1, which is a part of the inflammasome complex, can lead to pyroptosis, a type of cell death that involves the breaking open of the cells and, subsequently, intracellular component release [296]. Extracellular HSPs, for example, are indicators of cellular integrity loss and they, in turn, elicit both pro-inflammatory cytokine release (IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFα) and the innate immune response through TLR2 and TLR4. Moreover, they can also stimulate T-cell responses.
The activation of such an inflammatory pathway leads to microglial activation, which includes typical morphological changes (e.g., the restriction of microglial cellular ramifications, and the acquisition of the typical amoeboid cell shape) and the up-regulation of microglial activation markers (e.g., MHC-I, MHC-II, CD68, CD86, and Ym1) [297,298,299].
However, depending on the nature of the stimulus that triggers the microglial cell activation (i.e., infections or injuries), microglial cells are distinct in two main phenotypes: The neuro-toxic phenotype, the so-called M1-like and the M2-like. Therefore, stimuli such as acute hypoxia or pressure elevation promote the M1 phenotype instead of M2 by way of NF-κB induction and TLR4 [300,301]. Indeed, the M1 phenotype is characterized by an intense inflammatory response including the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL12, TNF-α) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) [277,278,279,280,281], an amoeboid morphology and a high phagocytic capacity [302,303,304]. Although this response in some cases helps to remove the toxic aggregated proteins and cell debris that affect the CNS [305,306,307], such M1 activation leads to a chronic inflammatory state which, over time, is responsible for neuronal death [308,309,310,311].
In contrast, the second phenotype, the M2-like, plays both anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic roles that promote the neuron survival [311,312,313]. In addition, the microglial cell morphology is characterized by thin cellular bodies and ramified processes [314].
Although, the neural damage itself is able to activate the inflammatory response in microglia either via the bond between the nucleotides, released by damaged neurons, and the microglia purinergic receptors [315,316] or the bond between HMGB1 and the microglia CD11b receptors [317].
In normal healthy human eyes, microglia are in a quiescent state [318], instead in glaucoma, both the activation of microglia and astroglia (i.e., astrocytes and Müller cells) are considered among the first events of neural damage which occurs before RGC loss. Indeed, both these retinal cell types perform immune surveillance and mediate inflammatory responses against infection, disease, or injury [314,319] (Figure 3). The correlation between both early microglial alteration and the extent of neurodegeneration has been observed in DBA/2J mice and it has also been explained that the treatment with a microglial activation inhibitor, monocycline, could slow the death of RGC [320,321].

6.3. Astrocytes Activation

Astrocytes are one of the cell types that belong to the glia in the CNS. Under pathological conditions, also astrocytes take part in “reactive gliosis”. Indeed, astroglial cells and the microglia work together to respond early to noxious stimuli which affect the ONH and the RGCs in glaucoma, both via the secretion of cytokines and chemokines and the activation of the adaptive immune defense response [322].
Astrocytes are the most abundant glia cell types in the CNS because they provide important cellular support functions for all parts of the neurons (i.e., supplying metabolites and growth factors; supporting synapse formation and plasticity; and regulating the extracellular balance of ions, fluids and neurotransmitters), and are responsible for brain homeostasis maintenance, including the axons at the lamina cribrosa and the prelaminar region of the ONH [270,323]. In addition, they form the interface between connective tissue surfaces and surround the blood vessels [270].
In particular, at ONH astrocyte level, two astrocyte sub-populations are found: Type1A, which expresses only glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Type1B, which expresses both GFAP and neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) and appears to be responsible for ECM production in the ONH [270]. In the early stage of oxidative damage, these quiescent astrocytes become “reactive”, in order to limit the extent of injury and to promote the tissue repair process by the up-regulation of extracellular matrix components, such as collagen, proteoglycan and adhesion molecules. Therefore, an altered ECM composition leads to a loss of compliance of this dynamic tissue. The resulted glial scar, marked by an increased expression of GFAP and vimentin, in addition to representing the hallmark for CNS injury, does not support axonal regrowth [270,324]. However, in the later stages, the optic nerve atrophy suggests that this process, instead of causing a large deposition of an extracellular matrix, actually activates tissue degradation. Therefore, the exaggerated reactive astrocyte response, leads to extracellular matrix degradation though the production of a large number of neurotrophic factors and cytokines (i.e TNFα), which are able to regulate the matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) synthesis, resulting in the typical formation of the cavernous spaces and the cupping of the ONH [271,325]. The increased MMP expression also seems to be associated with the loss of the retinal immune privilege allowing the penetration of antibodies into the eye [241].
Moreover, also the process of aging could be responsible for the changes in the optic nerve astrocyte function. For example, the phagocytic astrocytes in the myelination transition zone (MTZ) may become dysregulated. Thus, the up-regulation of Mac-2 in the presence of IOP elevation leads to an increase in the number of RGC with damaged axons in the retina [326].
In addition to the astrocyte activation at the ONH level, in glaucomatous patients, as well as in preclinical models of glaucoma, the astrocyte reactivity, found at the retina level, promotes both protective and detrimental effects [327].
Müller cells (MCs) are the major glial cells in the retina and they play a crucial role in the maintenance both of its homeostasis and its integrity thanks to the expression of several receptors related to cell growth and survival [328,329], the glutamate up-take to protect the RGC from glutamate excitotoxicity [330] and the release of nerve growth factor [330].
However, an over-activation of MCs, like microglia, promotes the release of inflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin-1 (IL-1), nitric oxide (NO) and ROS, which all contribute to exacerbate neuronal injury [331,332]. Moreover, MCs are involved in the activation of cell death receptors [333], as well as in the reduction of both potassium siphoning and water clearance [334].
In both cases, the astrocyte cell processes are connected to each other via gap junctions, of which connexins are the main components [327,335]. In particular, connexin-43 is the most abundant connexin expressed by astrocytes and, in glaucomatous patients, it is over-expressed in association with glial cell activation [336].
Reactive gliosis is, therefore, the mechanism involved in the neuroinflammatory response which underlies the glaucoma pathogenesis. Depending on the nature of the injury and the micro-environment at the injured site, together with the timing and the distance to the injured site [337], reactive astroglial cells can produce molecules, either with a neuroprotective role, such as IGF1 and the early induction of TNFα [338,339] or harmful molecules, such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS-2), a powerful enzyme related to post-ischemic brain injury that generates excessive amounts of nitric oxide (NO) and the longer-term expression of TNFα [338,340].

6.4. Glaucoma Neuroinflammation Signaling

In the CNS, the term “neuroinflammation” refers mainly to microglial activation but also to astrocytes response, without there being necessarily leukocyte influx from the blood [341]. However, in glaucoma the activated state of glial cells induces direct cytotoxic effects. An early up-regulation of many genes were found both in the retina and ONH, and were involved in the inflammatory pathways, such as TLRs, trasducers Trif, MyD88 as well as IL-1 and IL-6 [342,343,344,345].
The presence of defective immunoregulation in glaucoma has been reported [346] although there is no a direct link between the RGC loss and the aberrant humoral immunity in these patients. Indeed, a strong alteration in IgG antibody patterns (i.e., monoclonal gammopathy) in blood and AH of glaucomatous patients has been proven [347,348,349,350].
In the peripheral blood of both NTG and HTG patients, the presence of lymphocytes, that simultaneously express antigens, such as CD8 and HLA-DR or CD3 and CD8, has been found [351]. However, only in NGT patients, a significantly higher ratio between IL-2 and its soluble receptor (sIL-2R) has been reported. In fact, such an increase of sIL-2R has been previously described also in infectious, auto-immune diseases [352,353,354,355] and, interestingly, a further study has confirmed the possibility of the implication of immunological factors in glaucoma, whilst not having found a specific increase in the ratio of IL-2/sIL-2R in glaucomatous patients [196].
Furthermore, both elevated auto-antibody levels and decreased titers were found, including those against several HSPs (HSP27, HSP60, HSP70), some crystallines, structural proteins, like GFAP, vimentin and MBP, retinal deposits of immunoglobulins, and so on [4,356,357].
In addition, it has been reported that IOP-induced damage, both at a RGC and axon level, may persist even after IOP-lowering due to the induction of anti-HSP auto-immune responses [358]. However, since the eye is an immune-privileged site, it is not so clear why this signaling allows CD4+ T-cell infiltration in the retina to occur but it is certain that the T-cell responses are the cause of progressive neurodegeneration.
The presence of T-cell in the retina is also supported by glial cells through signals from HSPs, oxidative stress, as well as the NF-κB pathway. Therefore, if on one hand, both HSPs and oxidative stress up-regulate the glial expression of cytokines and MHC II through TLR signaling, which in turn, stimulates the T-cell proliferation [143], on the other hand, the NF-κB activation is responsible for a secondary inflammatory cascade in the microglia and astrocytes. This amplifies the immune response with recruitment to the damaged area of other cells such as T cells [280,299,359,360].
Moreover, previous studies on glaucomatous patient retinas showed an up-regulation of MyD88, which is a general adaptor protein that plays an important role in the Toll/IL-1 receptor family signaling, and members of the MAPK pathway, which play an important role in several cellular programs (e.g., proliferation, differentiation, development, transformation, and apoptosis). In addition to the gene regulation mentioned above, in the ONH of DBA/2J mice, the up-regulation of 11 TLRs was also found [280,359].

6.5. Glutamate Excitotoxicity

Glutamate is an essential amino acid and is also the main fast excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS). It plays an important role both in a wide variety of CNS functions (e.g., cognition, memory and learning) and in the retinal synaptic circuitry [361]. In fact, at eye level, cells such as photoreceptors, bipolar and ganglion cells are involved in the transferring of visual information from the retina to the brain through the release of glutamate.
There is a large amount of glutamate in the brain (about 5–15 mmol/kg) but only a tiny fraction of it is present at extracellular level. Indeed, glutamate stored within cells is not harmful while glutamate in the extracellular space can cause excitotoxicity via the receptor-mediated mechanisms. The extracellular fluid glutamate concentrations is physiologically around 3–4 µM, while in the cerebrospinal fluid it is about 10 µM [362,363].
Glutamate exerts its signaling role by acting both on ionotropic (iGluRs) and metabotropic (mGluRs) glutamate receptors and the glutamate concentration in the surrounding extracellular fluid determines the extent of receptor stimulation.
iGluRs are homo- or heteromeric receptor protein complexes and, based on their pharmacological and electrophysiological features, they are classified into three classes: AMPA (a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate) receptors, kainate (2-carboxy-3-carboxymethyl-4-isopropenyle-pyrrolidine) receptors and NMDA (Nmethyl-D-aspartate) receptors. When glutamate binds iGluRs, the integral non-selective cation channels are formed [364,365].
In physiological conditions, the extracellular glutamate concentration is kept low by the glutamate uptake. This process, in turn, is regulated by glutamate transporter proteins (e.g., “High-affinity” and “Low-affinity” glutamate transporters; sodium-dependent high affinity hetero-exchange mechanisms for glutamate and ascorbate; sodium-independent and chloride-dependent high-affinity glutamate uptake), which use the electrochemical gradients across the plasma membranes as driving forces for their uptake [366,367,368,369].
Therefore, a high glutamate concentration, excessively activating glutamate receptors, exerts toxic effects on the cells sufficient to cause their death [362].
Although, the concentration of glutamate in the vitreous chamber of glaucomatous eyes has been observed to be twice that of the concentration of the vitreous chamber of healthy eyes [23], it is not known if the same result could be obtained from the extracellular space of the retinal cells of glaucomatous eyes, as this measurement has not yet been performed [370].
The glutamate toxicity may contribute to RGC death in glaucoma and, in addition, it appears to be mediated mainly by the NMDA receptor that, apart from promoting cell death, due to its greater Ca2+permeability, has a high affinity for glutamate and a slow inactivation [370,371,372,373].
Glutamate excitotoxicity, like oxidative stress, is involved in the mtDNA alteration or DNA oxidation–related mitochondrial dysfunction in retinal neurodegeneration [374].
Glutamate excitotoxicity over-activity in the excitatory pathway which leads to neuronal cell death through high levels of glutamate and the over-stimulation of NMDA receptors. The excitotoxic damage to RGCs could initially be promoted by either an increased glutamate synthesis or a decreased glutamate clearance [375,376].
The high content of extracellular glutamate and the consequent over stimulation of its receptors, induce both an increase in energy consumption because after influx of Na+ and Ca2+ they need to be pumped out again with energy expenditure [377] and the trigger of apoptosis pathways in neurons due to the immense Ca2+ influx [363]. The intracellular increase in the Ca2+ concentration leads to a depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane potential and subsequently leads to the release of various bioactive substances into the cytosol (e.g., cytochrome c), which are able to drive apoptosis through DNA fragmentation [378]. Furthermore, this excessive activation of the glutamate receptor could also cause an oxidative burst [379] and potentiate both the toxic effects of H2O2 [380] and of mutant SOD [381] which, in turn, further impairs the energy production and glutamate uptake. Therefore, it is not surprising that, as a result of energy deprivation, Na,K-ATPase inhibition, as well as early mitochondrial damage, the neurons become more vulnerable to glutamate [382,383,384].
So, glutamate-induced cell death can be initiated by a rapid or slow path, depending on the glutamate concentration [385]. The rapid path is characterized by acute cellular injury with a massive influx of Na+ and Cl, with cell swelling and a necrotic cell death. Instead, the slow path is able to trigger a delayed cell death as a consequence of the initiating stimulus, and if caught early, is a reversible process [386,387].

7. Concluding Remarks

Glaucoma, still today, is considered a medical challenge due to the poor understanding of its disease mechanisms. However, several clinical and experimental studies are focusing on a wide range of cellular defects, which can drive its onset and the propagation of glaucomatous neurodegeneration. The eye undergoes constant stresses (i.e., exposure to light, to atmospheric oxygen, environmental chemicals and physical abrasion), which over time, can lead to several cell dysfunctions and ROS over-production.
In HTG, the first step for glaucoma onset is represented by conventional pathway defects due to this being the main reason for an elevated IOP. The IOP elevation, which has been long considered the primary glaucoma risk factor, is actually nothing but epiphenomena related to the condition of both this tract and its cells. Therefore, given the high complexity of glaucoma, it is today more correct to acknowledge that many factors, including chronic inflammation (i.e., the activation of glial cells), cell dysfunctions (at TM and glia levels), mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress and defects in the immune response (i.e., HSP-specific T cell responses, HSP up-regulations) all contribute to affecting the health of the cells of the eye, triggering the cascade of events that progressively leads to RGC death, optic nerve damage, and concomitant visual field loss. Although at first, NF-κB activation and the involvement of immune responses have a protective role for the eye’s homeostasis maintenance, their long-lasting activation leads to the so-called cytokine storm and detrimental effect of adaptive immune responses, which disrupt the retina homeostasis and result in the dysfunction of the immune privilege status of the eye.
In light of these events, it is important to further explore in more detail whether the inhibition of oxidative injury can stop the vicious circle which drives glaucoma neurodegeneration. Moreover, also a better understanding of the regulatory mechanisms underlying the immune response could have a greater positive impact on glaucoma therapy.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

S.V. was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health and by Fondazione Roma, Rome, Italy. S.T. was supported by Programma Operativo Por FSE, Liguria region 2014–2020, Italy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ACAnterior Chamber
AH Aqueous Humor
CBCiliar Body
ECM Extra Cellular Matrix
EREndoplasmic Reticulum
HSPsHeat Shock Proteins
HTGHigh Tension Glaucoma
IOPIntrocular Pressure
JCTJuxtacanalicular Connective Tissue
LCLamina Cribrosa
MMPsMatrix Metalloproteinases
mtDNAMitochondria DNA
NONitric Oxide
NTGNormal Tension Glaucoma
ONHOptic Nerve Head
OSOxidative Stress
POAGPrimary Open-Angle Glaucoma
RGCsRetinal Ganglion Cells
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
SCSchlemm’s Canal
SEMSchlemm Endothelial Cell
Th 1/2T-helper 1/2
TLRsToll Like Recepeptors
TMTrabecular Meshwork
TMETrabecular Endothelial Cell

References

  1. McMonnies, C.W. Glaucoma history and risk factors. J. Optom. 2017, 10, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Gupta, D.; Chen, P.P. Glaucoma. Am. Fam. Physician 2016, 93, 668–674. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Napoli, C.; Ignarro, L.J. Nitric oxide and pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of vascular diseases. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2009, 32, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bell, K.; Gramlich, O.W.; Von Thun Und Hohenstein-Blaul, N.; Beck, S.; Funke, S.; Wilding, C.; Pfeiffer, N.; Grus, F.H. Does autoimmunity play a part in the pathogenesis of glaucoma? Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2013, 36, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bhattacharya, S.K.; Lee, R.K.; Grus, F.H. Molecular Biomarkers in Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Salinas-Navarro, M.; Alarcón-Martínez, L.; Valiente-Soriano, F.J.; Jiménez-López, M.; Mayor-Torroglosa, S.; Avilés-Trigueros, M.; Villegas-Pérez, M.P.; Vidal-Sanz, M. Ocular hypertension impairs optic nerve axonal transport leading to progressive retinal ganglion cell degeneration. Exp. Eye Res. 2010, 90, 168–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ju, W.-K.; Kim, K.-Y.; Lindsey, J.D.; Angert, M.; Patel, A.; Scott, R.T.; Liu, Q.; Crowston, J.G.; Ellisman, M.H.; Perkins, G.A.; et al. Elevated hydrostatic pressure triggers release of OPA1 and cytochrome C, and induces apoptotic cell death in differentiated RGC-5 cells. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 120–134. [Google Scholar]
  8. Salinas-Navarro, M.; Alarcón-Martínez, L.; Valiente-Soriano, F.J.; Ortín-Martínez, A.; Jiménez-López, M.; Avilés-Trigueros, M.; Villegas-Pérez, M.P.; de la Villa, P.; Vidal-Sanz, M. Functional and morphological effects of laser-induced ocular hypertension in retinas of adult albino Swiss mice. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 2578–2598. [Google Scholar]
  9. Flammer, J.; Mozaffarieh, M. What Is the Present Pathogenetic Concept of Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy? Surv. Ophthalmol. 2007, 52, S162–S173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grieshaber, M.C.; Mozaffarieh, M.; Flammer, J. What Is the Link Between Vascular Dysregulation and Glaucoma? Surv. Ophthalmol. 2007, 52, S144–S154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grzybowski, A.; Och, M.; Kanclerz, P.; Leffler, C.; De Moraes, C.G. Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Vascular Risk Factors: A Review of Population Based Studies from 1990 to 2019. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Saccà, S.C.; Gandolfi, S.; Bagnis, A.; Manni, G.; Damonte, G.; Traverso, C.E.; Izzotti, A. From DNA damage to functional changes of the trabecular meshwork in aging and glaucoma. Ageing Res. Rev. 2016, 29, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Izzotti, A.; Longobardi, M.; Cartiglia, C.; Saccà, S.C. Proteome Alterations in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Aqueous Humor. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 4831–4838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Saccà, S.C.; Gandolfi, S.; Bagnis, A.; Manni, G.; Damonte, G.; Traverso, C.E.; Izzotti, A. The outflow pathway: A tissue with morphological and functional unity. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016, 231, 1876–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Drance, S.M.; Sweeney, V.P.; Morgan, R.W.; Feldman, F. Studies of Factors Involved in the Production of Low Tension Glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1973, 89, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tamm, E.R. The trabecular meshwork outflow pathways: Structural and functional aspects. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nga, A.D.; Yap, S.-L.; Samsudin, A.; Abdul-Rahman, P.S.; Hashim, O.H.; Mimiwati, Z. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in the aqueous humour of patients with primary angle closure glaucoma—A quantitative study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tezel, G. Oxidative stress in glaucomatous neurodegeneration: Mechanisms and consequences. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2006, 25, 490–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mozaffarieh, M.; Grieshaber, M.C.; Flammer, J. Oxygen and blood flow: Players in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Mol. Vis. 2008, 14, 224–233. [Google Scholar]
  20. Acott, T.S.; Kelley, M.J.; Keller, K.E.; Vranka, J.A.; Abu-Hassan, D.W.; Li, X.; Aga, M.; Bradley, J.M. Intraocular Pressure Homeostasis: Maintaining Balance in a High-Pressure Environment. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 30, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kwon, Y.H.; Fingert, J.H.; Kuehn, M.H.; Alward, W.L.M. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Calkins, D.J. Critical pathogenic events underlying progression of neurodegeneration in glaucoma. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2012, 31, 702–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Dreyer, E.B. Elevated Glutamate Levels in the Vitreous Body of Humans and Monkeys with Glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1996, 114, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Izzotti, A.; Saccà, S.C.; Cartiglia, C.; De Flora, S. Oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage in the eyes of glaucoma patients. Am. J. Med. 2003, 114, 638–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saccà, S.C. Oxidative DNA Damage in the Human Trabecular Meshwork: Clinical Correlation in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2005, 123, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tezel, G.; Yang, X.; Cai, J. Proteomic Identification of Oxidatively Modified Retinal Proteins in a Chronic Pressure-Induced Rat Model of Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46, 3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Junqueira, V.B.C.; Barros, S.B.M.; Chan, S.S.; Rodrigues, L.; Giavarotti, L.; Abud, R.L.; Deucher, G.P. Aging and oxidative stress. Mol. Asp. Med. 2004, 25, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, M.T.; Beal, M.F. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 2006, 443, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Izzotti, A.; Longobardi, M.; Cartiglia, C.; Saccà, S.C. Mitochondrial Damage in the Trabecular Meshwork Occurs Only in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and in Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e14567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zündorf, G.; Kahlert, S.; Bunik, V.I.; Reiser, G. α-Ketoglutarate dehydrogenase contributes to production of reactive oxygen species in glutamate-stimulated hippocampal neurons in situ. Neuroscience 2009, 158, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Crish, S.D.; Calkins, D.J. Neurodegeneration in glaucoma: Progression and calcium-dependent intracellular mechanisms. Neuroscience 2011, 176, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Batandier, C.; Leverve, X.; Fontaine, E. Opening of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore Induces Reactive Oxygen Species Production at the Level of the Respiratory Chain Complex I. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 17197–17204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Feissner, R.F.; Skalska, J.; Gaum, W.E.; Sheu, S.-S. Crosstalk signaling between mitochondrial Ca2+ and ROS. Front. Biosci. 2009, 14, 1197–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Liu, L.; Sha, X.-Y.; Wu, Y.-N.; Chen, M.-T.; Zhong, J.-X. Lycium barbarum polysaccharides protects retinal ganglion cells against oxidative stress injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2020, 15, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nita, M.; Grzybowski, A. The Role of the Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Stress in the Pathomechanism of the Age-Related Ocular Diseases and Other Pathologies of the Anterior and Posterior Eye Segments in Adults. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Green, K. Free Radicals and Aging of Anterior Segment Tissues of the Eye: A Hypothesis. ORE 1995, 27, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Flammer, J.; Haefliger, I.O.; Orgül, S.; Resink, T. Vascular dysregulation: A principal risk factor for glaucomatous damage? J. Glaucoma 1999, 8, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yeh, L.-H.; Park, Y.J.; Hansalia, R.J.; Ahmed, I.S.; Deshpande, S.S.; Goldschmidt-Clermont, P.J.; Irani, K.; Alevriadou, B.R. Shear-Induced Tyrosine Phosphorylation in Endothelial Cells Requires Rac1-Dependent Production of ROS. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 1999, 276, C838–C847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Izzotti, A.; Saccà, S.C.; Longobardi, M.; Cartiglia, C. Sensitivity of Ocular Anterior Chamber Tissues to Oxidative Damage and Its Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Babizhayev, M.A. Biomarkers and special features of oxidative stress in the anterior segment of the eye linked to lens cataract and the trabecular meshwork injury in primary open-angle glaucoma: Challenges of dual combination therapy with N-acetylcarnosine lubricant eye d: Enhanced oxidative stress in cataract and glaucoma. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012, 26, 86–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, T.; Xie, L.; Ye, J.; Liu, Y.; He, X. Screening of candidate genes for primary open angle glaucoma. Mol. Vis. 2012, 18, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Alvarado, J.A. A new insight into the cellular regulation of aqueous outflow: How trabecular meshwork endothelial cells drive a mechanism that regulates the permeability of Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005, 89, 1500–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Saccà, S.C.; Cutolo, C.A.; Rossi, T. Glaucoma: An Overview. In Handbook of Nutrition, Diet, and the Eye; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 167–187. ISBN 978-0-12-815245-4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sorkhabi, R.; Ghorbanihaghjo, A.; Javadzadeh, A.; Rashtchizadeh, N.; Moharrery, M. Oxidative DNA damage and total antioxidant status in glaucoma patients. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Bagnis, A.; Izzotti, A.; Centofanti, M.; Saccà, S.C. Aqueous humor oxidative stress proteomic levels in primary open angle glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2012, 103, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Knepper, P.A.; Goossens, W.; Palmberg, P.F. Glycosaminoglycan stratification of the juxtacanalicular tissue in normal and primary open-angle glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1996, 37, 2414–2425. [Google Scholar]
  47. Knepper, P.A.; Goossens, W.; Hvizd, M.; Palmberg, P.F. Glycosaminoglycans of the human trabecular meshwork in primary open-angle glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1996, 37, 1360–1367. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhao, J.; Wang, S.; Zhong, W.; Yang, B.; Sun, L.; Zheng, Y. Oxidative stress in the trabecular meshwork (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 38, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Saccà, S.C.; Tirendi, S.; Scarfì, S.; Passalacqua, M.; Oddone, F.; Traverso, C.E.; Vernazza, S.; Bassi, A.M. An advanced in vitro model to assess glaucoma onset. ALTEX Altern. Anim. Exp. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vernazza, S.; Tirendi, S.; Scarfì, S.; Passalacqua, M.; Oddone, F.; Traverso, C.E.; Rizzato, I.; Bassi, A.M.; Saccà, S.C. 2D- and 3D-cultures of human trabecular meshwork cells: A preliminary assessment of an in vitro model for glaucoma study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Babizhayev, M.A.; Bunin, A.Y. Lipid peroxidation in open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009, 67, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Welge-Lüßen, U.; Birke, K. Oxidativer Stress im Trabekelwerk beim POWG. Klin. Mon. Augenheilkd. 2010, 227, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Saccà, S.C.; Izzotti, A.; Rossi, P.; Traverso, C. Glaucomatous outflow pathway and oxidative stress. Exp. Eye Res. 2007, 84, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Abu-Amero, K.K.; Morales, J.; Bosley, T.M. Mitochondrial Abnormalities in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47, 2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Arruda, A.P.; Pers, B.M.; Parlakgül, G.; Güney, E.; Inouye, K.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Chronic enrichment of hepatic endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondria contact leads to mitochondrial dysfunction in obesity. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 1427–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Liton, P.B.; Lin, Y.; Luna, C.; Li, G.; Gonzalez, P.; Epstein, D.L. Cultured Porcine Trabecular Meshwork Cells Display Altered Lysosomal Function When Subjected to Chronic Oxidative Stress. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liton, P.B.; Challa, P.; Stinnett, S.; Luna, C.; Epstein, D.L.; Gonzalez, P. Cellular senescence in the glaucomatous outflow pathway. Exp. Gerontol. 2005, 40, 745–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Porter, K.; Nallathambi, J.; Lin, Y.; Liton, P.B. Lysosomal basification and decreased autophagic flux in oxidatively stressed trabecular meshwork cells: Implications for glaucoma pathogenesis. Autophagy 2013, 9, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Fossel, M. Cell Senescence in Human Aging and Disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 959, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, G.; Luna, C.; Qiu, J.; Epstein, D.L.; Gonzalez, P. Modulation of Inflammatory Markers by miR-146a during Replicative Senescence in Trabecular Meshwork Cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fumagalli, M.; d’Adda di Fagagna, F. SASPense and DDRama in cancer and ageing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 921–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, N.; Chintala, S.K.; Fini, M.E.; Schuman, J.S. Activation of a tissue-specific stress response in the aqueous outflow pathway of the eye defines the glaucoma disease phenotype. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Anholt, R.R.H.; Carbone, M.A. A molecular mechanism for glaucoma: Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response. Trends Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 586–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Cullinan, S.B.; Diehl, J.A. Coordination of ER and oxidative stress signaling: The PERK/Nrf2 signaling pathway. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2006, 38, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Muriach, M.; Flores-Bellver, M.; Romero, F.J.; Barcia, J.M. Diabetes and the Brain: Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Autophagy. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 2014, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Rao, R.V.; Ellerby, H.M.; Bredesen, D.E. Coupling endoplasmic reticulum stress to the cell death program. Cell Death Differ. 2004, 11, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Halliwell, B. Oxidative stress and neurodegeneration: Where are we now? J. Neurochem. 2006, 97, 1634–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Broman, A.T.; Quigley, H.A.; West, S.K.; Katz, J.; Munoz, B.; Bandeen-Roche, K.; Tielsch, J.M.; Friedman, D.S.; Crowston, J.; Taylor, H.R.; et al. Estimating the Rate of Progressive Visual Field Damage in Those with Open-Angle Glaucoma, from Cross-Sectional Data. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Feilchenfeld, Z.; Yücel, Y.H.; Gupta, N. Oxidative injury to blood vessels and glia of the pre-laminar optic nerve head in human glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2008, 87, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Barnham, K.J.; Masters, C.L.; Bush, A.I. Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Andersen, J.K. Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: Cause or consequence? Nat. Med. 2004, 10, S18–S25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tezel, G.; Luo, C.; Yang, X. Accelerated Aging in Glaucoma: Immunohistochemical Assessment of Advanced Glycation End Products in the Human Retina and Optic Nerve Head. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hernandez, M.R.; Luo, X.X.; Andrzejewska, W.; Neufeld, A.H. Age-Related Changes in the Extracellular Matrix of the Human Optic Nerve Head. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1989, 107, 476–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Streit, W.J. Microglial senescence: Does the brain’s immune system have an expiration date? Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29, 506–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ramírez, A.I.; Fernández-Albarral, J.A.; de Hoz, R.; López-Cuenca, I.; Salobrar-García, E.; Rojas, P.; Valiente-Soriano, F.J.; Avilés-Trigueros, M.; Villegas-Pérez, M.P.; Vidal-Sanz, M.; et al. Microglial changes in the early aging stage in a healthy retina and an experimental glaucoma model. In Progress in Brain Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  76. Xu, H.; Chen, M.; Forrester, J.V. Para-inflammation in the aging retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2009, 28, 348–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tezel, G.; Li, L.Y.; Patil, R.V.; Wax, M.B. TNF-alpha and TNF-alpha receptor-1 in the retina of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001, 42, 1787–1794. [Google Scholar]
  78. Neufeld, A.H.; Hernandez, M.R.; Gonzalez, M.; Geller, A. Cyclooxygenase-1 and Cyclooxygenase-2 in the Human Optic Nerve Head. Exp. Eye Res. 1997, 65, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, B.; Neufeld, A.H. Expression of nitric oxide synthase-2 (NOS-2) in reactive astrocytes of the human glaucomatous optic nerve head. Glia 2000, 30, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tezel, G.; Yang, X.; Luo, C.; Kain, A.D.; Powell, D.W.; Kuehn, M.H.; Kaplan, H.J. Oxidative Stress and the Regulation of Complement Activation in Human Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 5071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pun, P.B.L.; Lu, J.; Moochhala, S. Involvement of ROS in BBB dysfunction. Free Radic. Res. 2009, 43, 348–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tezel, G. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α in the Glaucomatous Retina and OpticNerve Head. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2004, 122, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Ischiropoulos, H.; Zhu, L.; Chen, J.; Tsai, M.; Martin, J.C.; Smith, C.D.; Beckman, J.S. Peroxynitrite-mediated tyrosine nitration catalyzed by superoxide dismutase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1992, 298, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Luthra, A.; Gupta, N.; Kaufman, P.L.; Weinreb, R.N.; Yücel, Y.H. Oxidative injury by peroxynitrite in neural and vascular tissue of the lateral geniculate nucleus in experimental glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2005, 80, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kuo, W.N.; Kanadia, R.N.; Shanbhag, V.P.; Morgan, R. Modification of proteins and polynucleotides by peroxynitrite. Cytobios 1999, 99, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Crow, J.P.; Ye, Y.Z.; Strong, M.; Kirk, M.; Barnes, S.; Beckman, J.S. Superoxide Dismutase Catalyzes Nitration of Tyrosines by Peroxynitrite in the Rod and Head Domains of Neurofilament-L. J. Neurochem. 2002, 69, 1945–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jang, B.; Han, S. Biochemical properties of cytochrome c nitrated by peroxynitrite. Biochimie 2006, 88, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tezel, G. Immunostaining of Heat Shock Proteins in the Retina and Optic Nerve Head of Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2000, 118, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Myer, C.; Perez, J.; Abdelrahman, L.; Mendez, R.; Khattri, R.B.; Junk, A.K.; Bhattacharya, S.K. Differentiation of soluble aqueous humor metabolites in primary open angle glaucoma and controls. Exp. Eye Res. 2020, 194, 108024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ferreira, S.M.; Lerner, S.F.; Brunzini, R.; Evelson, P.A.; Llesuy, S.F. Oxidative stress markers in aqueous humor of glaucoma patients. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2004, 137, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ghanem, A.A.; Elewa, A.M.; Arafa, L.F. Endothelin-1 and Nitric Oxide Levels in Patients with Glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res. 2011, 46, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zhao, Y.; Zhu, H.; Yang, Y.; Ye, Y.; Yao, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shu, X.; Chen, X.; Yang, Y.; et al. AQP1 suppression by ATF4 triggers trabecular meshwork tissue remodelling in ET-1-induced POAG. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 3469–3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Buisset, A.; Gohier, P.; Leruez, S.; Muller, J.; Amati-Bonneau, P.; Lenaers, G.; Bonneau, D.; Simard, G.; Procaccio, V.; Annweiler, C.; et al. Metabolomic Profiling of Aqueous Humor in Glaucoma Points to Taurine and Spermine Deficiency: Findings from the Eye-D Study. J. Proteome Res. 2019, 18, 1307–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Hannappel, E.; Pankow, G.; Grassl, F.; Brand, K.; Naumann, G.O.H. Amino Acid Pattern in Human Aqueous Humor of Patients with Senile Cataract and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res. 1985, 17, 341–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ozcan, A.A.; Ozdemir, N.; Canataroglu, A. The Aqueous Levels of TGF-2 in Patients with Glaucoma. Int. Ophthalmol. 2004, 25, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yamamoto, N.; Itonaga, K.; Marunouchi, T.; Majima, K. Concentration of Transforming Growth Factor β2 in Aqueous Humor. Ophthalmic Res. 2005, 37, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dan, J. Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 in the Aqueous Humor of Patients with and Without Glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2005, 123, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Duan, X.; Xue, P.; Wang, N.; Dong, Z.; Lu, Q.; Yang, F. Proteomic analysis of aqueous humor from patients with primary open angle glaucoma. Mol. Vis. 2010, 16, 2839–2846. [Google Scholar]
  99. Alvarado, J.; Murphy, C.; Juster, R. Trabecular Meshwork Cellularity in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma and Nonglaucomatous Normals. Ophthalmology 1984, 91, 564–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chen, Y.-S.; Green, C.R.; Danesh-Meyer, H.V.; Rupenthal, I.D. Neuroprotection in the treatment of glaucoma—A focus on connexin43 gap junction channel blockers. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015, 95, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Advances in Immunology; Academic Press: Salt Lake, UT, USA, 1995; ISBN 978-0-08-057834-7.
  102. Brigelius-Flohé, R.; Flohé, L. Basic principles and emerging concepts in the redox control of transcription factors. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 2335–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Barnes, P.J.; Karin, M. Nuclear Factor-κB—A Pivotal Transcription Factor in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. New Engl. J. Med. 1997, 336, 1066–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Willems, M.; Dubois, N.; Musumeci, L.; Bours, V.; Robe, P.A. IκBζ: An emerging player in cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Siebenlist, U.; Franzoso, G.; Brown, K. Structure, Regulation and Function of NF-kappaB. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 1994, 10, 405–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Baeuerle, P.A.; Baltimore, D. NF-κB: Ten Years after. Cell 1996, 87, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Baldwin, A.S. THE NF-κB AND IκB PROTEINS: New Discoveries and Insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1996, 14, 649–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Dejardin, E. The alternative NF-κB pathway from biochemistry to biology: Pitfalls and promises for future drug development. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006, 72, 1161–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pahl, H.L. Activators and target genes of Rel/NF-κB transcription factors. Oncogene 1999, 18, 6853–6866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Chung, K. Cytokines as Targets in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. CDT 2006, 7, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Williams, R.O.; Paleolog, E.; Feldmann, M. Cytokine inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2007, 7, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Holgate, S.T. Pathogenesis of Asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2008, 38, 872–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ghosh, S.; Karin, M. Missing Pieces in the NF-κB Puzzle. Cell 2002, 109, S81–S96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Sigala, J.L.D.; Bottero, V.; Young, D.B.; Shevchenko, A.; Mercurio, F.; Verma, I.M. Activation of Transcription Factor NF-κB Requires ELKS, an IκB Kinase Regulatory Subunit. Science 2004, 304, 1963–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Chen, G.; Cao, P.; Goeddel, D.V. TNF-Induced Recruitment and Activation of the IKK Complex Require Cdc37 and Hsp90. Mol. Cell 2002, 9, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Malhotra, D.; Portales-Casamar, E.; Singh, A.; Srivastava, S.; Arenillas, D.; Happel, C.; Shyr, C.; Wakabayashi, N.; Kensler, T.W.; Wasserman, W.W.; et al. Global mapping of binding sites for Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 5718–5734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Leonard, M.O.; Kieran, N.E.; Howell, K.; Burne, M.J.; Varadarajan, R.; Dhakshinamoorthy, S.; Porter, A.G.; O’Farrelly, C.; Rabb, H.; Taylor, C.T.; et al. Reoxygenation-specific activation of the antioxidant transcription factor Nrf2 mediates cytoprotective gene expression in ischemia-reperfusion injury. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 2624–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chorley, B.N.; Campbell, M.R.; Wang, X.; Karaca, M.; Sambandan, D.; Bangura, F.; Xue, P.; Pi, J.; Kleeberger, S.R.; Bell, D.A. Identification of novel NRF2-regulated genes by ChIP-Seq: Influence on retinoid X receptor alpha. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 7416–7429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Ishii, T.; Itoh, K.; Takahashi, S.; Sato, H.; Yanagawa, T.; Katoh, Y.; Bannai, S.; Yamamoto, M. Transcription Factor Nrf2 Coordinately Regulates a Group of Oxidative Stress-inducible Genes in Macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 16023–16029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Park, E.Y.; Rho, H.M. The trascriptional activation of the human copper/zinc superoxide dismutase gene by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin through two different regulator sites, the anitoxidant responsive element and xenobiotic responsive element. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2002, 240, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Thimmulappa, R.K.; Mai, K.H.; Srisuma, S.; Kensler, T.W.; Yamamoto, M.; Biswal, S. Identification of Nrf2-regulated Genes Induced by the Chemopreventive Agent Sulforaphane by Oligonucleotide Microarray. Cancer Res. 2002, 62. Available online: https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/62/18/5196.short (accessed on 24 April 2020).
  122. Motohashi, H.; Yamamoto, M. Nrf2–Keap1 defines a physiologically important stress response mechanism. Trends Mol. Med. 2004, 10, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Eggler, A.L.; Small, E.; Hannink, M.; Mesecar, A.D. Cul3-mediated Nrf2 ubiquitination and antioxidant response element (ARE) activation are dependent on the partial molar volume at position 151 of Keap1. Biochem. J. 2009, 422, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Takaya, K.; Suzuki, T.; Motohashi, H.; Onodera, K.; Satomi, S.; Kensler, T.W.; Yamamoto, M. Validation of the multiple sensor mechanism of the Keap1-Nrf2 system. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Jain, A.K.; Jaiswal, A.K. GSK-3β Acts Upstream of Fyn Kinase in Regulation of Nuclear Export and Degradation of NF-E2 Related Factor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 16502–16510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Buelna-Chontal, M.; Zazueta, C. Redox activation of Nrf2 & NF-κB: A double end sword? Cell. Signal. 2013, 25, 2548–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Chen, C.-Y.; Jang, J.-H.; Li, M.-H.; Surh, Y.-J. Resveratrol upregulates heme oxygenase-1 expression via activation of NF-E2-related factor 2 in PC12 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 331, 993–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Surh, Y.-J. Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Balogun, E.; Hoque, M.; Gong, P.; Killeen, E.; Green, C.J.; Foresti, R.; Alam, J.; Motterlini, R. Curcumin activates the haem oxygenase-1 gene via regulation of Nrf2 and the antioxidant-responsive element. Biochem. J. 2003, 371, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Bellezza, I.; Mierla, A.L.; Minelli, A. Nrf2 and NF-κB and Their Concerted Modulation in Cancer Pathogenesis and Progression. Cancers 2010, 2, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Gloire, G.; Legrand-Poels, S.; Piette, J. NF-κB activation by reactive oxygen species: Fifteen years later. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006, 72, 1493–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Minelli, A.; Grottelli, S.; Mierla, A.; Pinnen, F.; Cacciatore, I.; Bellezza, I. Cyclo (His-Pro) exerts anti-inflammatory effects by modulating NF-κB and Nrf2 signalling. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ross, R. Cell Biology of Atherosclerosis. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1995, 57, 791–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Saccà, S.C.; Izzotti, A. Focus on molecular events in the anterior chamber leading to glaucoma. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 2197–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Schmetterer, L.; Polak, K. Role of Nitric Oxide in the Control of Ocular Blood Flow. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2001, 20, 823–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Saccà, S.C.; Pulliero, A.; Izzotti, A. The Dysfunction of the Trabecular Meshwork during Glaucoma Course. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015, 230, 510–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Xie, Q.W.; Kashiwabara, Y.; Nathan, C. Role of transcription factor NF-kappa B/Rel in induction of nitric oxide synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 4705–4708. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  138. Bredt, D.S.; Snyder, S.H. NITRIC OXIDE: A Physiologic Messenger Molecule. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994, 63, 175–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Esterbauer, H.; Schaur, R.J.; Zollner, H. Chemistry and biochemistry of 4-hydroxynonenal, malonaldehyde and related aldehydes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1991, 11, 81–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mattson, M.P. Modification of ion homeostasis by lipid peroxidation: Roles in neuronal degeneration and adaptive plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Fernández-Durango, R.; Fernández-Martínez, A.; García-Feijoo, J.; Castillo, A.; de la Casa, J.M.; García-Bueno, B.; Pérez-Nievas, B.G.; Fernández-Cruz, A.; Leza, J.C. Expression of Nitrotyrosine and Oxidative Consequences in the Trabecular Meshwork of Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 2506–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Yang, X.; Luo, C.; Cai, J.; Powell, D.W.; Yu, D.; Kuehn, M.H.; Tezel, G. Neurodegenerative and Inflammatory Pathway Components Linked to TNF-α/TNFR1 Signaling in the Glaucomatous Human Retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 8442–8454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Luo, C.; Yang, X.; Kain, A.D.; Powell, D.W.; Kuehn, M.H.; Tezel, G. Glaucomatous Tissue Stress and the Regulation of Immune Response through Glial Toll-like Receptor Signaling. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 5697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Tezel, G. TNF-α signaling in glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Prog. Brain Res. 2008, 173, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Harari, O.A.; Liao, J.K. NF-κB and innate immunity in ischemic stroke. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1207, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Genestra, M. Oxyl radicals, redox-sensitive signalling cascades and antioxidants. Cell. Signal. 2007, 19, 1807–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Zambrano, S.; Toma, I.D.; Piffer, A.; Bianchi, M.E.; Agresti, A. NF-κB oscillations translate into functionally related patterns of gene expression. Elife 2016, 5, e09100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Dinarello, C.A. Biology of interleukin 1. FASEB J. 1988, 2, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Schreck, R.; Rieber, P.; Baeuerle, P.A. Reactive oxygen intermediates as apparently widely used messengers in the activation of the NF-kappa B transcription factor and HIV-1. EMBO J. 1991, 10, 2247–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Cook, J.R.; Mody, M.K.; Fini, M.E. Failure to Activate Transcription Factor NF-κB in Corneal Stromal Cells (Keratocytes). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999, 40, 3122–3131. [Google Scholar]
  151. Beg, A.A.; Baltimore, D. An Essential Role for NF-κB in Preventing TNF-α-Induced Cell Death. Science 1996, 274, 782–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Kee, C.; Seo, K. The effect of interleukin-1alpha on outflow facility in rat eyes. J. Glaucoma 1997, 6, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Alexander, J.P.; Samples, J.R.; Buskirk, E.M.V.; Acott, T.S. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and inhibitor by human trabecular meshwork. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1991, 32, 172–180. [Google Scholar]
  154. Civan, M.M.; Macknight, A.D.C. The ins and outs of aqueous humour secretion. Exp. Eye Res. 2004, 78, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Sharma, S.; Tun, T.A.; Baskaran, M.; Atalay, E.; Thakku, S.G.; Liang, Z.; Milea, D.; Strouthidis, N.G.; Aung, T.; Girard, M.J. Effect of acute intraocular pressure elevation on the minimum rim width in normal, ocular hypertensive and glaucoma eyes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 102, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Alvarado, J.A.; Yeh, R.-F.; Franse-Carman, L.; Marcellino, G.; Brownstein, M.J. Interactions between endothelia of the trabecular meshwork and of Schlemm’s canal: A new insight into the regulation of aqueous outflow in the eye. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 2005, 103, 148–162; discussion 162–163. [Google Scholar]
  157. Abu-Hassan, D.; Acott, T.; Kelley, M. The Trabecular Meshwork: A Basic Review of Form and Function. J. Ocul. Biol. 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Costagliola, C.; dell’Omo, R.; Agnifili, L.; Bartollino, S.; Fea, A.M.; Uva, M.G.; Zeppa, L.; Mastropasqua, L. How many aqueous humor outflow pathways are there? Surv. Ophthalmol. 2020, 65, 144–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Rohen, J.W.; Futa, R.; Lütjen-Drecoll, E. The fine structure of the cribriform meshwork in normal and glaucomatous eyes as seen in tangential sections. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1981, 21, 574–585. [Google Scholar]
  160. Epstein, D.L.; Rohen, J.W. Morphology of the trabecular meshwork and inner-wall endothelium after cationized ferritin perfusion in the monkey eye. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1991, 32, 160–171. [Google Scholar]
  161. Ye, W.; Gong, H.; Sit, A.; Johnson, M.; Freddo, T.F. Interendothelial junctions in normal human Schlemm’s canal respond to changes in pressure. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1997, 38, 2460–2468. [Google Scholar]
  162. Raviola, G. Schwalbe line’s cells: A new cell type in the trabecular meshwork of Macaca mulatta. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1982, 22, 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  163. Keller, K.E.; Aga, M.; Bradley, J.M.; Kelley, M.J.; Acott, T.S. Extracellular matrix turnover and outflow resistance. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Tian, B.; Gabelt, B.T.; Geiger, B.; Kaufman, P.L. The role of the actomyosin system in regulating trabecular fluid outflow. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Alm, A.; Nilsson, S.F.E. Uveoscleral outflow—A review. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Flügel-Koch, C.; Ohlmann, A.; Fuchshofer, R.; Welge-Lüssen, U.; Tamm, E.R. Thrombospondin-1 in the trabecular meshwork: Localization in normal and glaucomatous eyes, and induction by TGF-β1 and dexamethasone in vitro. Exp. Eye Res. 2004, 79, 649–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Acott, T.S.; Kelley, M.J. Extracellular matrix in the trabecular meshwork. Exp. Eye Res. 2008, 86, 543–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Rhee, D.J.; Fariss, R.N.; Brekken, R.; Helene Sage, E.; Russell, P. The matricellular protein SPARC is expressed in human trabecular meshwork. Exp. Eye Res. 2003, 77, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Chatterjee, A.; Villarreal, G.; Rhee, D.J. Matricellular Proteins in the Trabecular Meshwork: Review and Update. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014, 30, 447–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Stamer, W.D.; Acott, T.S. Current understanding of conventional outflow dysfunction in glaucoma. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2012, 23, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Gong, H.; Ruberti, J.; Overby, D.; Johnson, M.; Freddo, T.F. A new view of the human trabecular meshwork using quick-freeze, deep-etch electron microscopy. Exp. Eye Res. 2002, 75, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Karl, M.O.; Fleischhauer, J.C.; Stamer, W.D.; Peterson-Yantorno, K.; Mitchell, C.H.; Stone, R.A.; Civan, M.M. Differential P1-purinergic modulation of human Schlemm’s canal inner-wall cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2005, 288, C784–C794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Overby, D.R.; Stamer, W.D.; Johnson, M. The changing paradigm of outflow resistance generation: Towards synergistic models of the JCT and inner wall endothelium. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 656–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Pedrigi, R.M.; Simon, D.; Reed, A.; Stamer, W.D.; Overby, D.R. A model of giant vacuole dynamics in human Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells. Exp. Eye Res. 2011, 92, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Ethier, C.R.; Coloma, F.M.; Sit, A.J.; Johnson, M. Two pore types in the inner-wall endothelium of Schlemm’s canal. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1998, 39, 2041–2048. [Google Scholar]
  176. Johnstone, M.A.; Grant, W.M. Pressure-Dependent Changes in Structures of the Aqueous Outflow System of Human and Monkey Eyes. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1973, 75, 365–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Allingham, R.R.; de KATER, A.W.; Ethier, R.C. Schlemm’s Canal and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: Correlation between Schlemm’s Canal Dimensions and Outflow Facility. Exp. Eye Res. 1996, 62, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Johnson, M. What controls aqueous humour outflow resistance? Exp. Eye Res. 2006, 82, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Overby, D.R.; Bertrand, J.; Tektas, O.-Y.; Boussommier-Calleja, A.; Schicht, M.; Ethier, C.R.; Woodward, D.F.; Stamer, W.D.; Lütjen-Drecoll, E. Ultrastructural Changes Associated with Dexamethasone-Induced Ocular Hypertension in Mice. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Hann, C.R.; Vercnocke, A.J.; Bentley, M.D.; Jorgensen, S.M.; Fautsch, M.P. Anatomic Changes in Schlemm’s Canal and Collector Channels in Normal and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Eyes Using Low and High Perfusion Pressures. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Stamer, W.D.; Clark, A.F. The many faces of the trabecular meshwork cell. Exp. Eye Res. 2017, 158, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Teng, C.C.; Paton, R.T.; Katzin, H.M. Primary Degeneration in the Vicinity of the Chamber Angle. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1955, 40, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Dvorak-Theobald Further Studies on the Canal of Schlemm. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1955, 39, 65–89. [CrossRef]
  184. Bahler, C.K.; Howell, K.G.; Hann, C.R.; Fautsch, M.P.; Johnson, D.H. Prostaglandins Increase Trabecular Meshwork Outflow Facility in Cultured Human Anterior Segments. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2008, 145, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Millard, L.H.; Woodward, D.F.; Stamer, W.D. The Role of the Prostaglandin EP 4 Receptor in the Regulation of Human Outflow Facility. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Wan, Z.; Woodward, D.F.; Cornell, C.L.; Fliri, H.G.; Martos, J.L.; Pettit, S.N.; Wang, J.W.; Kharlamb, A.B.; Wheeler, L.A.; Garst, M.E.; et al. Bimatoprost, Prostamide Activity, and Conventional Drainage. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 4107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Woodward, D.F.; Nilsson, S.F.E.; Toris, C.B.; Kharlamb, A.B.; Nieves, A.L.; Krauss, A.H.-P. Prostanoid EP4 Receptor Stimulation Produces Ocular Hypotension by a Mechanism That Does Not Appear to Involve Uveoscleral Outflow. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  188. Toris, C.B.; Gabelt, B.T.; Kaufman, P.L. Update on the Mechanism of Action of Topical Prostaglandins for Intraocular Pressure Reduction. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2008, 53, S107–S120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Ziai, N. The Effects on Aqueous Dynamics of PhXA41, a New Prostaglandin F2α Analogue, After Topical Application in Normal and Ocular Hypertensive Human Eyes. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1993, 111, 1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Mettu, P.S.; Deng, P.-F.; Misra, U.K.; Gawdi, G.; Epstein, D.L.; Rao, P.V. Role of Lysophospholipid Growth Factors in the Modulation of Aqueous Humor Outflow Facility. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Stamer, W.D.; Read, A.T.; Sumida, G.M.; Ethier, C.R. Sphingosine-1-phosphate effects on the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal and outflow facility in perfused human eyes. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 89, 980–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Kuchtey, J.; Rezaei, K.A.; Jaru-Ampornpan, P.; Sternberg, P.; Kuchtey, R.W. Multiplex Cytokine Analysis Reveals Elevated Concentration of Interleukin-8 in Glaucomatous Aqueous Humor. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 6441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Tripathi, R.C.; Li, J.; Chan, W.A.; Tripathi, B.J. Aqueous Humor in Glaucomatous Eyes Contains an Increased Level of TGF-β2. Exp. Eye Res. 1994, 59, 723–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Fuchshofer, R.; Stephan, D.A.; Russell, P.; Tamm, E.R. Gene expression profiling of TGFβ2- and/or BMP7-treated trabecular meshwork cells: Identification of Smad7 as a critical inhibitor of TGF-β2 signaling. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 1020–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Shin, D.-M.; Jeon, J.-H.; Kim, C.-W.; Cho, S.-Y.; Lee, H.-J.; Jang, G.-Y.; Jeong, E.M.; Lee, D.-S.; Kang, J.-H.; Melino, G.; et al. TGFβ mediates activation of transglutaminase 2 in response to oxidative stress that leads to protein aggregation. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 2498–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Huang, P.; Qi, Y.; Xu, Y.-S.; Liu, J.; Liao, D.; Zhang, S.S.-M.; Zhang, C. Serum Cytokine Alteration is Associated with Optic Neuropathy in Human Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. J. Glaucoma 2009, 19, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Huang, P.; Zhang, S.S.-M.; Zhang, C. The two sides of cytokine signaling and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. J. Ocul. Biol. Dis. Inform. 2009, 2, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Avotri, S.; Eatman, D.; Russell-Randall, K. Effects of Resveratrol on Inflammatory Biomarkers in Glaucomatous Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells. Nutrients 2019, 11, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. De Groef, L.; Van Hove, I.; Dekeyster, E.; Stalmans, I.; Moons, L. MMPs in the Trabecular Meshwork: Promising Targets for Future Glaucoma Therapies? Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 7756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Chua, J.; Vania, M.; Cheung, C.M.G.; Ang, M.; Chee, S.P.; Yang, H.; Li, J.; Wong, T.T. Expression profile of inflammatory cytokines in aqueous from glaucomatous eyes. Mol. Vis. 2012, 18, 431–438. [Google Scholar]
  201. Li, A.; Leung, C.T.; Peterson-Yantorno, K.; Stamer, W.D.; Civan, M.M. Cytoskeletal Dependence of Adenosine Triphosphate Release by Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 7996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Li, A.; Leung, C.T.; Peterson-Yantorno, K.; Stamer, W.D.; Mitchell, C.H.; Civan, M.M. Mechanisms of ATP release by human trabecular meshwork cells, the enabling step in purinergic regulation of aqueous humor outflow. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012, 227, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Chowdhury, U.R.; Bahler, C.K.; Hann, C.R.; Chang, M.; Resch, Z.T.; Romero, M.F.; Fautsch, M.P. ATP-Sensitive Potassium (KATP) Channel Activation Decreases Intraocular Pressure in the Anterior Chamber of the Eye. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 6435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Zhou, L.; Fukuchi, T.; Kawa, J.E.; Higginbotham, E.J.; Yue, B.Y. Loss of cell-matrix cohesiveness after phagocytosis by trabecular meshwork cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1995, 36, 787–795. [Google Scholar]
  205. Calthorpe, C.M.; Grierson, I. Fibronectin induces migration of bovine trabecular meshwork cells in vitro. Exp. Eye Res. 1990, 51, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Stumpff, F.; Wiederholt, M. Regulation of trabecular meshwork contractility. Ophthalmologica 2000, 214, 33–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Weinreb, R.; Cotlier, E.; Yue, B.Y. The extracellular matrix and its modulation in the trabecular meshwork. Surv. Ophthalmol. 1996, 40, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Nathanson, J.A.; McKee, M. Alterations of ocular nitric oxide synthase in human glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1995, 36, 1774–1784. [Google Scholar]
  209. Wiederholt, M.; Sturm, A.; Lepple-Wienhues, A. Relaxation of trabecular meshwork and ciliary muscle by release of nitric oxide. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1994, 35, 2515–2520. [Google Scholar]
  210. Haynes, W.G.; Webb, D.J. Endothelin as a regulator of cardiovascular function in health and disease. J. Hypertens. 1998, 16, 1081–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Saccà, S.C.; Centofanti, M.; Izzotti, A. New Proteins as Vascular Biomarkers in Primary Open Angle Glaucomatous Aqueous Humor. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Blondin, C.; Hamard, P.; Brignole, F.; Baudouin, C. Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells Produce the Pro-inflammatory Chemokines Interleukin-8 (IL-8) and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) in vitro. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003, 44, 679. [Google Scholar]
  213. Micera, A.; Quaranta, L.; Esposito, G.; Floriani, I.; Pocobelli, A.; Saccà, S.C.; Riva, I.; Manni, G.; Oddone, F. Differential Protein Expression Profiles in Glaucomatous Trabecular Meshwork: An Evaluation Study on a Small Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Population. Adv. Ther. 2016, 33, 252–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Li, G.; Luna, C.; Liton, P.B.; Navarro, I.; Epstein, D.L.; Gonzalez, P. Sustained stress response after oxidative stress in trabecular meshwork cells. Mol. Vis. 2007, 13, 2282–2288. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  215. Luna, C.; Li, G.; Liton, P.B.; Epstein, D.L.; Gonzalez, P. Alterations in gene expression induced by cyclic mechanical stress in trabecular meshwork cells. Mol. Vis. 2009, 15, 534–544. [Google Scholar]
  216. Fuchshofer, R.; Tamm, E.R. Modulation of extracellular matrix turnover in the trabecular meshwork. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Liesenborghs, I.; Eijssen, L.M.T.; Kutmon, M.; Gorgels, T.G.M.F.; Evelo, C.T.; Beckers, H.J.M.; Webers, C.A.B.; Schouten, J.S.A.G. Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of trabecular meshwork gene expression data to unravel the molecular pathogenesis of primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020, 98, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Tamm, E.R.; Siegner, A.; Baur, A.; Lütjen-Drecoll, E. Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Induces α-Smooth Muscle-Actin Expression in Cultured Human and Monkey Trabecular Meshwork. Exp. Eye Res. 1996, 62, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Sanka, K.; Maddala, R.; Epstein, D.L.; Rao, P.V. Influence of Actin Cytoskeletal Integrity on Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Activation in Cultured Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Sabanay, I.; Gabelt, B.T.; Tian, B.; Kaufman, P.L.; Geiger, B. H-7 Effects on the Structure and Fluid Conductance of Monkey Trabecular Meshwork. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2000, 118, 955–962. [Google Scholar]
  221. Vittitow, J.L.; Garg, R.; Rowlette, L.-L.S.; Epstein, D.L.; O’Brien, E.T.; Borrás, T. Gene transfer of dominant-negative RhoA increases outflow facility in perfused human anterior segment cultures. Mol. Vis. 2002, 8, 32–44. [Google Scholar]
  222. Lütjen-Drecoll, E. Functional morphology of the trabecular meshwork in primate eyes. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 1999, 18, 91–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Epstein, D.L.; Rowlette, L.L.; Roberts, B.C. Acto-myosin drug effects and aqueous outflow function. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999, 40, 74–81. [Google Scholar]
  224. Rönkkö, S.; Rekonen, P.; Kaarniranta, K.; Puustjärvi, T.; Teräsvirta, M.; Uusitalo, H. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in the chamber angle of normal eyes and patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliation glaucoma. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2007, 245, 697–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Bradley, J.M.; Vranka, J.; Colvis, C.M.; Conger, D.M.; Alexander, J.P.; Fisk, A.S.; Samples, J.R.; Acott, T.S. Effect of matrix metalloproteinases activity on outflow in perfused human organ culture. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1998, 39, 2649–2658. [Google Scholar]
  226. Rhee, D.J.; Haddadin, R.I.; Kang, M.H.; Oh, D.-J. Matricellular proteins in the trabecular meshwork. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Downs, J.C.; Roberts, M.D.; Sigal, I.A. Glaucomatous Cupping of the Lamina Cribrosa: A Review of the Evidence for Active Progressive Remodeling as a Mechanism. Exp. Eye Res 2011, 93, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Tomarev, S.I.; Wistow, G.; Raymond, V.; Dubois, S.; Malyukova, I. Gene Expression Profile of the Human Trabecular Meshwork: NEIBank Sequence Tag Analysis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003, 44, 2588–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Kimura, S.; Suzuki, K.; Sagara, T.; Nishida, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Kitazawa, Y. Regulation of Connexin Phosphorylation and Cell–Cell Coupling in Trabecular Meshwork Cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 2222–2228. [Google Scholar]
  230. Goodenough, D.A.; Goliger, J.A.; Paul, D.L. Connexins, Connexons, and Intercellular Communication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65, 475–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Tellios, N.; Feng, M.; Chen, N.; Liu, H.; Tellios, V.; Wang, M.; Li, X.; Chang, C.A.; Hutnik, C. Mechanical stretch upregulates connexin43 in human trabecular meshwork cells. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2019, 47, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Zhou, M.; Lu, B.; Tan, W.; Fu, M. Identification of lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA regulatory network associated with primary open angle glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  233. Yoon, J.-H.; Abdelmohsen, K.; Gorospe, M. Functional interactions among microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 34, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  234. Pasquale, L.R.; Loomis, S.J.; Kang, J.H.; Yaspan, B.L.; Abdrabou, W.; Budenz, D.L.; Chen, T.C.; DelBono, E.; Friedman, D.S.; Gaasterland, D.; et al. CDKN2B-AS1 Genotype–Glaucoma Feature Correlations in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients from the United States. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 155, 342–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  235. Wiggs, J.L.; Yaspan, B.L.; Hauser, M.A.; Kang, J.H.; Allingham, R.R.; Olson, L.M.; Abdrabou, W.; Fan, B.J.; Wang, D.Y.; Brodeur, W.; et al. Common Variants at 9p21 and 8q22 Are Associated with Increased Susceptibility to Optic Nerve Degeneration in Glaucoma. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  236. Li, F.; Wen, X.; Zhang, H.; Fan, X. Novel Insights into the Role of Long Noncoding RNA in Ocular Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  237. Xie, L.; Mao, M.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Pan, Z.; Shi, J.; Duan, X.; Jia, S.; Jiang, B. Potential Biomarkers for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Identified by Long Noncoding RNA Profiling in the Aqueous Humor. Am. J. Pathol. 2019, 189, 739–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Zhao, J.; Sun, H.; Zhang, J.-M.; Wang, M.; Du, X.-J.; Zhang, J.-L. Long non-coding RNA ANRIL down-regulates microRNA-7 to protect human trabecular meshwork cells in an experimental model for glaucoma. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 3173–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Fan, C.-N.; Ma, L.; Liu, N. Systematic analysis of lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA competing endogenous RNA network identifies four-lncRNA signature as a prognostic biomarker for breast cancer. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Guo, X.; Yang, J.; Liang, B.; Shen, T.; Yan, Y.; Huang, S.; Zhou, J.; Huang, J.; Gu, L.; Su, L. Identification of Novel LncRNA Biomarkers and Construction of LncRNA-Related Networks in Han Chinese Patients with Ischemic Stroke. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 50, 2157–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Jiang, S.; Kametani, M.; Chen, D.F. Adaptive Immunity: New Aspects of Pathogenesis Underlying Neurodegeneration in Glaucoma and Optic Neuropathy. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  242. Meng, B.; Li, H.; Sun, X.; Qu, W.; Yang, B.; Cheng, F.; Shi, L.; Yuan, H. σ-1 receptor stimulation protects against pressure-induced damage through InsR-MAPK signaling in human trabecular meshwork cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  243. Beit-Yannai, E.; Shmulevich, A. Does the aqueous humor have a role in mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) intracellular signaling in Glaucoma? Med. Hypotheses 2007, 68, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Webber, H.C.; Bermudez, J.Y.; Millar, J.C.; Mao, W.; Clark, A.F. The Role of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling and K-Cadherin in the Regulation of Intraocular Pressure. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  245. Ahadome, S.D.; Zhang, C.; Tannous, E.; Shen, J.; Zheng, J.J. Small-molecule inhibition of Wnt signaling abrogates dexamethasone-induced phenotype of primary human trabecular meshwork cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2017, 357, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Zhao, J.; Du, X.; Wang, M.; Yang, P.; Zhang, J. Salidroside mitigates hydrogen peroxide-induced injury by enhancement of microRNA-27a in human trabecular meshwork cells. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 1758–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  247. Tay, Y.; Rinn, J.; Pandolfi, P.P. The multilayered complexity of ceRNA crosstalk and competition. Nature 2014, 505, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  248. McKinnon, S.J.; Goldberg, L.D.; Peeples, P.; Walt, J.G.; Bramley, T.J. Current management of glaucoma and the need for complete therapy. Am. J. Manag. Care 2008, 14, S20–S27. [Google Scholar]
  249. Saccà, S.C.; Vernazza, S.; Iorio, E.L.; Tirendi, S.; Bassi, A.M.; Gandolfi, S.; Izzotti, A. Molecular changes in glaucomatous trabecular meshwork. Correlations with retinal ganglion cell death and novel strategies for neuroprotection. Prog. Brain Res. 2020, 256, 151–188. [Google Scholar]
  250. Bouhenni, R.; Dunmire, J.; Sewell, A.; Edward, D.P. Animal Models of Glaucoma. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Sappington, R.M.; Sidorova, T.; Long, D.J.; Calkins, D.J. TRPV1: Contribution to Retinal Ganglion Cell Apoptosis and Increased Intracellular Ca2+ with Exposure to Hydrostatic Pressure. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  252. Moreno, M.C.; Campanelli, J.; Sande, P.; Sáenz, D.A.; Keller Sarmiento, M.I.; Rosenstein, R.E. Retinal Oxidative Stress Induced by High Intraocular Pressure. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 37, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Ferreira, S.M.; Lerner, S.F.; Brunzini, R.; Reides, C.G.; Evelson, P.A.; Llesuy, S.F. Time Course Changes of Oxidative Stress Markers in a Rat Experimental Glaucoma Model. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  254. Henein, C.; Khaw, P.T. The interplay between inflammation, immunity and commensal microflora in glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Ann. Eye Sci. 2019, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Wostyn, P.; Audenaert, K.; De Deyn, P.P. Alzheimer’s disease and glaucoma: Is there a causal relationship? Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009, 93, 1557–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  256. Cesareo, M.; Martucci, A.; Ciuffoletti, E.; Mancino, R.; Cerulli, A.; Sorge, R.P.; Martorana, A.; Sancesario, G.; Nucci, C. Association Between Alzheimer’s Disease and Glaucoma: A Study Based on Heidelberg Retinal Tomography and Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  257. Yücel, Y. Effects of retinal ganglion cell loss on magno-, parvo-, koniocellular pathways in the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in glaucoma. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2003, 22, 465–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Gupta, N. Human glaucoma and neural degeneration in intracranial optic nerve, lateral geniculate nucleus, and visual cortex. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006, 90, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Weber, A.J.; Chen, H.; Hubbard, W.C.; Kaufman, P.L. Experimental Glaucoma and Cell Size, Density, and Number in the Primate Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 1370–1379. [Google Scholar]
  260. Quigley, H.A. Blockade of Rapid Axonal Transport: Effect of Intraocular Pressure Elevation in Primate Optic Nerve. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1979, 97, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Takihara, Y.; Inatani, M.; Eto, K.; Inoue, T.; Kreymerman, A.; Miyake, S.; Ueno, S.; Nagaya, M.; Nakanishi, A.; Iwao, K.; et al. In vivo imaging of axonal transport of mitochondria in the diseased and aged mammalian CNS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 10515–10520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  262. Spear, P.D.; Kim, C.B.Y.; Ahmad, A.; Tom, B.W. Relationship between numbers of retinal ganglion cells and lateral geniculate neurons in the rhesus monkey. Vis. Neurosci. 1996, 13, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Gupta, N.; Yücel, Y.H. Glaucoma as a neurodegenerative disease. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2007, 18, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Quigley, H.A.; Hohman, R.M.; Addicks, E.M.; Massof, R.W.; Green, W.R. Morphologic Changes in the Lamina Cribrosa Correlated with Neural Loss in Open-Angle Glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1983, 95, 673–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Perlson, E.; Maday, S.; Fu, M.; Moughamian, A.J.; Holzbaur, E.L.F. Retrograde axonal transport: Pathways to cell death? Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  266. Fahy, E.T.; Chrysostomou, V.; Crowston, J.G. Impaired Axonal Transport and Glaucoma. Curr. Eye Res. 2015, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Harada, C.; Harada, T.; Quah, H.-M.A.; Namekata, K.; Yoshida, K.; Ohno, S.; Tanaka, K.; Parada, L.F. Role of Neurotrophin-4/5 in Neural Cell Death during Retinal Development and Ischemic Retinal Injury In Vivo. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Johnson, E.C.; Guo, Y.; Cepurna, W.O.; Morrison, J.C. Neurotrophin roles in retinal ganglion cell survival: Lessons from rat glaucoma models. Exp. Eye Res. 2009, 88, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  269. Ren, R.; Jonas, J.B.; Tian, G.; Zhen, Y.; Ma, K.; Li, S.; Wang, H.; Li, B.; Zhang, X.; Wang, N. Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure in Glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Hernandez, M.R. The optic nerve head in glaucoma: Role of astrocytes in tissue remodeling. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2000, 19, 297–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Tezel, G.; Wax, M.B. Increased Production of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α by Glial Cells Exposed to Simulated Ischemia or Elevated Hydrostatic Pressure Induces Apoptosis in Cocultured Retinal Ganglion Cells. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 8693–8700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Yuan, L.; Neufeld, A.H. Tumor necrosis factor-α: A potentially neurodestructive cytokine produced by glia in the human glaucomatous optic nerve head. Glia 2000, 32, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Chevalier-Larsen, E.; Holzbaur, E.L.F. Axonal transport and neurodegenerative disease. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2006, 1762, 1094–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  274. Crish, S.D.; Sappington, R.M.; Inman, D.M.; Horner, P.J.; Calkins, D.J. Distal axonopathy with structural persistence in glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5196–5201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  275. Ashhurst, T.M.; van Vreden, C.; Niewold, P.; King, N.J.C. The plasticity of inflammatory monocyte responses to the inflamed central nervous system. Cell. Immunol. 2014, 291, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Glass, C.K.; Saijo, K.; Winner, B.; Marchetto, M.C.; Gage, F.H. Mechanisms Underlying Inflammation in Neurodegeneration. Cell 2010, 140, 918–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  277. Magni, P.; Ruscica, M.; Dozio, E.; Rizzi, E.; Beretta, G.; Facino, R.M. Parthenolide Inhibits the LPS-induced Secretion of IL-6 and TNF-α and NF-κB Nuclear Translocation in BV-2 Microglia: PARTHENOLIDE INHIBITION OF BV-2 MICROGLIA. Phytother. Res. 2012, 26, 1405–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Wei, X.; Yu, Z.; Cho, K.-S.; Chen, H.; Malik, M.T.A.; Chen, X.; Lo, E.H.; Wang, X.; Chen, D.F. Neuroglobin Is an Endogenous Neuroprotectant for Retinal Ganglion Cells against Glaucomatous Damage. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 179, 2788–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Bosco, A.; Crish, S.D.; Steele, M.R.; Romero, C.O.; Inman, D.M.; Horner, P.J.; Calkins, D.J.; Vetter, M.L. Early Reduction of Microglia Activation by Irradiation in a Model of Chronic Glaucoma. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Howell, G.R.; Macalinao, D.G.; Sousa, G.L.; Walden, M.; Soto, I.; Kneeland, S.C.; Barbay, J.M.; King, B.L.; Marchant, J.K.; Hibbs, M.; et al. Molecular clustering identifies complement and endothelin induction as early events in a mouse model of glaucoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 1429–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Ebneter, A.; Casson, R.J.; Wood, J.P.M.; Chidlow, G. Microglial Activation in the Visual Pathway in Experimental Glaucoma: Spatiotemporal Characterization and Correlation with Axonal Injury. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 6448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  282. Kim, W.-K.; Hwang, S.-Y.; Oh, E.-S.; Piao, H.Z.; Kim, K.-W.; Han, I.-O. TGF-β1 Represses Activation and Resultant Death of Microglia via Inhibition of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Activity. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 7015–7023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  283. Le, Y.; Iribarren, P.; Gong, W.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.M. TGF-β1 Disrupts Endotoxin Signaling in Microglial Cells through Smad3 and MAPK Pathways. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  284. Zhou, X.; Zöller, T.; Krieglstein, K.; Spittau, B. TGFβ1 inhibits IFNγ-mediated microglia activation and protects mDA neurons from IFNγ-driven neurotoxicity. J. Neurochem. 2015, 134, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Spittau, B.; Dokalis, N.; Prinz, M. The Role of TGFβ Signaling in Microglia Maturation and Activation. Trends Immunol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Shull, M.M.; Ormsby, I.; Kier, A.B.; Pawlowski, S.; Diebold, R.J.; Yin, M.; Allen, R.; Sidman, C.; Proetzel, G.; Calvin, D. Targeted disruption of the mouse transforming growth factor-β1 gene results in multifocal inflammatory disease. Nature 1992, 359, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Spittau, B. Aging Microglia—Phenotypes, Functions and Implications for Age-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. van Eden, W.; Jansen, M.A.A.; Ludwig, I.; van Kooten, P.; van der Zee, R.; Broere, F. The Enigma of Heat Shock Proteins in Immune Tolerance. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Jin, C.; Cleveland, J.C.; Ao, L.; Li, J.; Zeng, Q.; Fullerton, D.A.; Meng, X. Human Myocardium Releases Heat Shock Protein 27 (HSP27) after Global Ischemia: The Proinflammatory Effect of Extracellular HSP27 through Toll-like Receptor (TLR)-2 and TLR4. Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Rosenberger, K.; Dembny, P.; Derkow, K.; Engel, O.; Krüger, C.; Wolf, S.A.; Kettenmann, H.; Schott, E.; Meisel, A.; Lehnardt, S. Intrathecal heat shock protein 60 mediates neurodegeneration and demyelination in the CNS through a TLR4- and MyD88-dependent pathway. Mol. Neurodegener. 2015, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  291. Swaroop, S.; Sengupta, N.; Suryawanshi, A.R.; Adlakha, Y.K.; Basu, A. HSP60 plays a regulatory role in IL-1β-induced microglial inflammation via TLR4-p38 MAPK axis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  292. Murakami, Y.; Ishikawa, K.; Nakao, S.; Sonoda, K.-H. Innate immune response in retinal homeostasis and inflammatory disorders. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2020, 74, 100778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Solà-Villà, D.; Camacho, M.; Solà, R.; Soler, M.; Diaz, J.-M.; Vila, L. IL-1β induces VEGF, independently of PGE2 induction, mainly through the PI3-K/mTOR pathway in renal mesangial cells. Kidney Int. 2006, 70, 1935–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  294. Pavilack, M.A.; Elner, V.M.; Elner, S.G.; Todd, R.F.; Huber, A.R. Differential expression of human corneal and perilimbal ICAM-1 by inflammatory cytokines. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1992, 33, 564–573. [Google Scholar]
  295. Khan, S.; Cole, N.; Hume, E.B.; Garthwaite, L.; Conibear, T.C.R.; Miles, D.H.; Aliwaga, Y.; Krockenberger, M.B.; Willcox, M.D.P. The role of CXC chemokine receptor 2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal infection. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007, 81, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Yerramothu, P.; Vijay, A.K.; Willcox, M.D.P. Inflammasomes, the eye and anti-inflammasome therapy. Eye 2018, 32, 491–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Nimmerjahn, A. Resting Microglial Cells Are Highly Dynamic Surveillants of Brain Parenchyma in Vivo. Science 2005, 308, 1314–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  298. Kigerl, K.A.; de Rivero Vaccari, J.P.; Dietrich, W.D.; Popovich, P.G.; Keane, R.W. Pattern recognition receptors and central nervous system repair. Exp. Neurol. 2014, 258, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  299. Rojas, B.; Gallego, B.I.; Ramírez, A.I.; Salazar, J.J.; de Hoz, R.; Valiente-Soriano, F.J.; Avilés-Trigueros, M.; Villegas-Perez, M.P.; Vidal-Sanz, M.; Triviño, A.; et al. Microglia in mouse retina contralateral to experimental glaucoma exhibit multiple signs of activation in all retinal layers. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014, 11, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  300. Wang, H.; Song, X.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Tao, Y.; Xiya, X.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Y.; Chang, D.; Sha, Q. The role of TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway in activated microglia of rats with chronic high intraocular pressure and vitro scratch injury-induced microglia. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 83, 106395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Tang, Y. Editorial: Microglial Polarization in the Pathogenesis and Therapeutics of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  302. Varnum, M.M.; Ikezu, T. The Classification of Microglial Activation Phenotypes on Neurodegeneration and Regeneration in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2012, 60, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  303. González, H.; Elgueta, D.; Montoya, A.; Pacheco, R. Neuroimmune regulation of microglial activity involved in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neuroimmunol. 2014, 274, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Jones, E.V.; Bouvier, D.S. Astrocyte-Secreted Matricellular Proteins in CNS Remodelling during Development and Disease. Neural Plast. 2014, 2014, 321209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  305. Ding, Y.M.; Jaumotte, J.D.; Signore, A.P.; Zigmond, M.J. Effects of 6-hydroxydopamine on primary cultures of substantia nigra: Specific damage to dopamine neurons and the impact of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. J. Neurochem. 2004, 89, 776–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Simard, A.R.; Soulet, D.; Gowing, G.; Julien, J.-P.; Rivest, S. Bone Marrow-Derived Microglia Play a Critical Role in Restricting Senile Plaque Formation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuron 2006, 49, 489–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  307. Glezer, I.; Simard, A.R.; Rivest, S. Neuroprotective role of the innate immune system by microglia. Neuroscience 2007, 147, 867–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Block, M.L.; Zecca, L.; Hong, J.-S. Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: Uncovering the molecular mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Lull, M.E.; Block, M.L. Microglial activation and chronic neurodegeneration. Neurotherapeutics 2010, 7, 354–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  310. Burguillos, M.A.; Deierborg, T.; Kavanagh, E.; Persson, A.; Hajji, N.; Garcia-Quintanilla, A.; Cano, J.; Brundin, P.; Englund, E.; Venero, J.L.; et al. Caspase signalling controls microglia activation and neurotoxicity. Nature 2011, 472, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Kettenmann, H.; Hanisch, U.-K.; Noda, M.; Verkhratsky, A. Physiology of Microglia. Physiol. Rev. 2011, 91, 461–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  312. Suh, H.-S.; Zhao, M.-L.; Derico, L.; Choi, N.; Lee, S.C. Insulin-like growth factor 1 and 2 (IGF1, IGF2) expression in human microglia: Differential regulation by inflammatory mediators. J. Neuroinflamm. 2013, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  313. Tang, Y.; Le, W. Differential Roles of M1 and M2 Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 1181–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Ramirez, A.I.; de Hoz, R.; Salobrar-Garcia, E.; Salazar, J.J.; Rojas, B.; Ajoy, D.; López-Cuenca, I.; Rojas, P.; Triviño, A.; Ramírez, J.M. The Role of Microglia in Retinal Neurodegeneration: Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson, and Glaucoma. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  315. Koizumi, S.; Shigemoto-Mogami, Y.; Nasu-Tada, K.; Shinozaki, Y.; Ohsawa, K.; Tsuda, M.; Joshi, B.V.; Jacobson, K.A.; Kohsaka, S.; Inoue, K. UDP acting at P2Y6 receptors is a mediator of microglial phagocytosis. Nature 2007, 446, 1091–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  316. Wu, L.-J.; Vadakkan, K.I.; Zhuo, M. ATP-induced chemotaxis of microglial processes requires P2Y receptor-activated initiation of outward potassium currents. Glia 2007, 55, 810–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Nakazawa, T.; Nakazawa, C.; Matsubara, A.; Noda, K.; Hisatomi, T.; She, H.; Michaud, N.; Hafezi-Moghadam, A.; Miller, J.W.; Benowitz, L.I. Tumor Necrosis Factor- Mediates Oligodendrocyte Death and Delayed Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 12633–12641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  318. Neufeld, A.H.; Liu, B. Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy: When Glia Misbehave. Neurosci. 2003, 9, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Soto, I.; Howell, G.R. The Complex Role of Neuroinflammation in Glaucoma. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, a017269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Bosco, A.; Inman, D.M.; Steele, M.R.; Wu, G.; Soto, I.; Marsh-Armstrong, N.; Hubbard, W.C.; Calkins, D.J.; Horner, P.J.; Vetter, M.L. Reduced Retina Microglial Activation and Improved Optic Nerve Integrity with Minocycline Treatment in the DBA/2J Mouse Model of Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Bosco, A.; Romero, C.O.; Breen, K.T.; Chagovetz, A.A.; Steele, M.R.; Ambati, B.K.; Vetter, M.L. Neurodegeneration severity can be predicted from early microglia alterations monitored in vivo in a mouse model of chronic glaucoma. Dis. Models Mech. 2015, 8, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  322. Colombo, E.; Farina, C. Astrocytes: Key Regulators of Neuroinflammation. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Sofroniew, M.V. Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  324. Hatten, M.E.; Liem, R.K.H.; Shelanski, M.L.; Mason, C.A. Astroglia in CNS injury. Glia 1991, 4, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Yan, X. Matrix Metalloproteinases and Tumor Necrosis Factor α in Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Head. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2000, 118, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  326. Davey, P. Glaucoma: Current Clinical and Research Aspects; BoD—Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2011; ISBN 978-953-307-263-0. [Google Scholar]
  327. Mélik Parsadaniantz, S.; Réaux-le Goazigo, A.; Sapienza, A.; Habas, C.; Baudouin, C. Glaucoma: A Degenerative Optic Neuropathy Related to Neuroinflammation? Cells 2020, 9, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  328. Hu, B.; Yip, H.K.; So, K.-F. Localization of p75 neurotrophin receptor in the retina of the adult SD rat: An immunocytochemical study at light and electron microscopic levels. Glia 1998, 24, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Lebrun-Julien, F.; Morquette, B.; Douillette, A.; Saragovi, H.U.; Di Polo, A. Inhibition of p75NTR in glia potentiates TrkA-mediated survival of injured retinal ganglion cells. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2009, 40, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Bringmann, A.; Iandiev, I.; Pannicke, T.; Wurm, A.; Hollborn, M.; Wiedemann, P.; Osborne, N.N.; Reichenbach, A. Cellular signaling and factors involved in Müller cell gliosis: Neuroprotective and detrimental effects. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2009, 28, 423–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Bringmann, A.; Pannicke, T.; Grosche, J.; Francke, M.; Wiedemann, P.; Skatchkov, S.; Osborne, N.; Reichenbach, A. Müller cells in the healthy and diseased retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2006, 25, 397–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Garcia, T.B.; Pannicke, T.; Vogler, S.; Berk, B.-A.; Grosche, A.; Wiedemann, P.; Seeger, J.; Reichenbach, A.; Herculano, A.M.; Bringmann, A. Nerve growth factor inhibits osmotic swelling of rat retinal glial (Müller) and bipolar cells by inducing glial cytokine release. J. Neurochem. 2014, 131, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  333. Xu, F.; Wei, Y.; Lu, Q.; Zheng, D.; Zhang, F.; Gao, E.; Wang, N. Immunohistochemical localization of sortilin and p75NTR in normal and ischemic rat retina. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 454, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Bringmann, A.; Uckermann, O.; Pannicke, T.; Iandiev, I.; Reichenbach, A.; Wiedemann, P. Neuronal versus glial cell swelling in the ischaemic retina: Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 2005. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2005, 83, 528–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Hernandez, M.R.; Miao, H.; Lukas, T. Astrocytes in glaucomatous optic neuropathy. In Progress in Brain Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 173, pp. 353–373. ISBN 978-0-444-53256-5. [Google Scholar]
  336. Kerr, N.M.; Johnson, C.S.; Green, C.R.; Danesh-Meyer, H.V. Gap junction protein connexin43 (GJA1) in the human glaucomatous optic nerve head and retina. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2011, 18, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Tomimoto, H.; Akiguchi, I.; Wakita, H.; Suenaga, T.; Nakamura, S.; Kimura, J. Regressive changes of astroglia in white matter lesions in cerebrovascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease patients. Acta Neuropathol. 1997, 94, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Mac Nair, C.E.; Nickells, R.W. Neuroinflammation in Glaucoma and Optic Nerve Damage. In Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 134, pp. 343–363. ISBN 978-0-12-801059-4. [Google Scholar]
  339. Arroba, A.I.; Campos-Caro, A.; Aguilar-Diosdado, M.; Valverde, Á.M. IGF-1, Inflammation and Retinal Degeneration: A Close Network. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Nanetti, L.; Taffi, R.; Vignini, A.; Moroni, C.; Raffaelli, F.; Bacchetti, T.; Silvestrini, M.; Provinciali, L.; Mazzanti, L. Reactive oxygen species plasmatic levels in ischemic stroke. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 303, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Williams, P.A.; Marsh-Armstrong, N.; Howell, G.R.; Bosco, A.; Danias, J.; Simon, J.; Di Polo, A.; Kuehn, M.H.; Przedborski, S.; Raff, M.; et al. Neuroinflammation in glaucoma: A new opportunity. Exp. Eye Res. 2017, 157, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  342. Ahmed, F.; Brown, K.M.; Stephan, D.A.; Morrison, J.C.; Johnson, E.C.; Tomarev, S.I. Microarray Analysis of Changes in mRNA Levels in the Rat Retina after Experimental Elevation of Intraocular Pressure. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004, 45, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  343. Howell, G.R.; Soto, I.; Zhu, X.; Ryan, M.; Macalinao, D.G.; Sousa, G.L.; Caddle, L.B.; MacNicoll, K.H.; Barbay, J.M.; Porciatti, V.; et al. Radiation treatment inhibits monocyte entry into the optic nerve head and prevents neuronal damage in a mouse model of glaucoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 1246–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  344. Yang, Z.; Quigley, H.A.; Pease, M.E.; Yang, Y.; Qian, J.; Valenta, D.; Zack, D.J. Changes in Gene Expression in Experimental Glaucoma and Optic Nerve Transection: The Equilibrium between Protective and Detrimental Mechanisms. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007, 48, 5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Pinazo-Duran, M.D.; Muñoz-Negrete, F.J.; Sanz-Gonzalez, S.; Benitez-del-Castillo, J.; Gimenez-Gomez, R.; Valero-Vello, M.; Zanon-Moreno, V.; Garcia-Medina, J.J. The Role of Neuroinflammation in the Pathogenesis of Glaucoma Neurodegeneration. In Progress in Brain Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  346. Tezel, G.; Wax, M.B. Glaucoma. In Chemical Immunology and Allergy; Niederkorn, J.Y., Kaplan, H.J., Eds.; KARGER: Basel, Switzerland, 2007; pp. 221–227. ISBN 978-3-8055-8187-5. [Google Scholar]
  347. Grus, F.H.; Joachim, S.C.; Wuenschig, D.; Rieck, J.; Pfeiffer, N. Autoimmunity and Glaucoma. J. Glaucoma 2008, 17, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Grus, F.H.; Joachim, S.C.; Hoffmann, E.M.; Pfeiffer, N. Complex autoantibody repertoires in patients with glaucoma. Mol. Vis. 2004, 10, 13–17. [Google Scholar]
  349. Grus, F.; Joachim, S.; Pfeiffer, N. Diagnosis of Glaucoma by Complex Autoantibody Repertoires in Body Fluids. PCT Patent WO2004036220A1, 29 April 2004. [Google Scholar]
  350. Joachim, S.C.; Grus, F.H.; Pfeiffer, N. Analysis of Autoantibody Repertoires in Sera of Patients with Glaucoma. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 13, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Yang, J.; Patil, R.V.; Yu, H.; Gordon, M.; Wax, M.B. T cell subsets and sIL-2R/IL-2 levels in patients with glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2001, 131, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Marlottl, S.; Caturegll, P.; Barbesino, G.; Marinò, M.; Prete, G.F.; Chlovato, L.; Tonacchera, M.; Carll, M.; Pinchers, A. Thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity independently modulate serum concentration of soluble interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor (sIL-2R) in thyroid diseases. Clin. Endocrinol. 1992, 37, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Yamaguchi, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Tate, G.; Matsumoto, T.; Matsumiya, A.; Kuzume, M.; Sanada, Y.; Kumada, K. Specific detection of Epstein-Barr virus in inflammatory pseudotumor of the spleen in a patient with a high serum level of soluble IL-2 receptor. J. Gastroenterol. 2000, 35, 563–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Ferrarini, A.M.; Sivieri, S.; Bulian, P.; Buttarello, M.; Biasi, G.; Tavolato, B.; Gallo, P. Time-course of interleukin-2 receptor expression in interferon beta-treated multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neuroimmunol. 1998, 84, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  355. Zorn, U.; Dallmann, I.; Groβe, J.; Kirchner, H.; Poliwoda, H.; Atzpodien, J. Soluble interleukin 2 receptors abrogate IL-2 induced activation of peripheral mononuclear cells. Cytokine 1994, 6, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Joachim, S.C.; Bruns, K.; Lackner, K.J.; Pfeiffer, N.; Grus, F.H. Antibodies to α B-Crystallin, Vimentin, and Heat Shock Protein 70 in Aqueous Humor of Patients with Normal Tension Glaucoma and IgG Antibody Patterns Against Retinal Antigen in Aqueous Humor. Curr. Eye Res. 2007, 32, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  357. Wax, M.B.; Tezel, G.; Saito, I.; Gupta, R.S.; Harley, J.B.; Li, Z.; Romano, C. Anti-Ro/SS-a positivity and heat shock protein antibodies in patients with normal-pressure glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1998, 125, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Chen, H.; Cho, K.-S.; Vu, T.H.K.; Shen, C.-H.; Kaur, M.; Chen, G.; Mathew, R.; McHam, M.L.; Fazelat, A.; Lashkari, K.; et al. Commensal microflora-induced T cell responses mediate progressive neurodegeneration in glaucoma. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Howell, G.R.; Walton, D.O.; King, B.L.; Libby, R.T.; John, S.W. Datgan, a reusable software system for facile interrogation and visualization of complex transcription profiling data. BMC Genom. 2011, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  360. Gallego, B.I.; Salazar, J.J.; de Hoz, R.; Rojas, B.; Ramírez, A.I.; Salinas-Navarro, M.; Ortín-Martínez, A.; Valiente-Soriano, F.J.; Avilés-Trigueros, M.; Villegas-Perez, M.P.; et al. IOP induces upregulation of GFAP and MHC-II and microglia reactivity in mice retina contralateral to experimental glaucoma. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  361. Nucci, C.; Piccirilli, S.; Nisticò, R.; Morrone, L.A.; Cerulli, L.; Bagetta, G. Apoptosis in the Mechanisms of Neuronal Plasticity in the Developing Visual System. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 13, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  362. Danbolt, N.C. Glutamate uptake. Prog. Neurobiol. 2001, 65, 1–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Epstein, F.H.; Lipton, S.A.; Rosenberg, P.A. Excitatory Amino Acids as a Final Common Pathway for Neurologic Disorders. New Engl. J. Med. 1994, 330, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  364. Monaghan, D.T.; Bridges, R.J.; Cotman, C.W. The Excitatory Amino Acid Receptors: Their Classes, Pharmacology, and Distinct Properties in the Function of the Central Nervous System. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1989, 29, 365–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Hollmann, M.; Heinemann, S. Cloned Glutamate Receptors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1994, 17, 31–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Bannai, S.; Christensen, H.N.; Vadgama, J.V.; Ellory, J.C.; Englesberg, E.; Guidotti, G.G.; Gazzola, G.C.; Kilberg, M.S.; Lajtha, A.; Sacktor, B. Amino acid transport systems. Nature 1984, 311, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  367. Danbolt, N.C.; Storm-Mathisen, J.; Kanner, B.I. An [Na+ + K+] coupledl-glutamate transporter purified from rat brain is located in glial cell processes. Neuroscience 1992, 51, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  368. Balcar, V.J.; Shen, J.; Bao, S.; King, N.J.C. Na+ -dependent high affinity uptake of l -glutamate in primary cultures of human fibroblasts isolated from three different types of tissue. FEBS Lett. 1994, 339, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  369. Grünewald, R.A. Ascorbic acid in the brain. Brain Res. Rev. 1993, 18, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Seki, M.; Lipton, S.A. Targeting excitotoxic/free radical signaling pathways for therapeutic intervention in glaucoma. In Progress in Brain Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 173, pp. 495–510. ISBN 978-0-444-53256-5. [Google Scholar]
  371. Lotery, A.J. Glutamate excitotoxicity in glaucoma: Truth or fiction? Eye 2005, 19, 369–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  372. Conn, P.J.; Pin, J.-P. Pharmacology and functions of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Annu. Rev. Pharm. Toxicol. 1997, 37, 205–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  373. Carter-Dawson, L.; Crawford, M.L.J.; Harwerth, R.S.; Smith, E.L.; Feldman, R.; Shen, F.F.; Mitchell, C.K.; Whitetree, A. Vitreal Glutamate Concentration in Monkeys with Experimental Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 2633–2637. [Google Scholar]
  374. Lee, D.; Shim, M.S.; Kim, K.-Y.; Noh, Y.H.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.Y.; Weinreb, R.N.; Ju, W.-K. Coenzyme Q10 Inhibits Glutamate Excitotoxicity and Oxidative Stress–Mediated Mitochondrial Alteration in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  375. Azuma, N.; Kawamura, M.; Kohsaka, S. Morphological and immunohistochemical studies on degenerative changes of the retina and the optic nerve in neonatal rats injected with monosodium-L-glutamate. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1989, 93, 72–79. [Google Scholar]
  376. Siliprandi, R.; Canella, R.; Carmignoto, G.; Schiavo, N.; Zanellato, A.; Zanoni, R.; Vantini, G. N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced neurotoxicity in the adult rat retina. Vis. Neurosci. 1992, 8, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  377. Ying, W. Deleterious Network: A Testable Pathogenetic Concept of Alzheimer’s Disease. Gerontology 1997, 43, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  378. Green, D.R.; Reed, J.C. Mitochondria and Apoptosis. Science 1998, 281, 1309–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  379. Savolainen, K.M.; Loikkanen, J.; Naarala, J. Amplification of glutamate-induced oxidative stress. Toxicol. Lett. 1995, 82–83, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Mailly, F.; Marin, P.; Israël, M.; Glowinski, J.; Prémont, J. Increase in External Glutamate and NMDA Receptor Activation Contribute to H2O2-Induced Neuronal Apoptosis. J. Neurochem. 2001, 73, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  381. Guo, Z.H. Neurotrophic Factors Protect Cortical Synaptic Terminals Against Amyloid- and Oxidative Stress-induced Impairment of Glucose Transport, Glutamate Transport and Mitochondrial Function. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  382. Brines, M.L.; Dare, A.O.; de Lanerolle, N.C. The cardiac glycoside ouabain potentiates excitotoxic injury of adult neurons in rat hippocampus. Neurosci. Lett. 1995, 191, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  383. Kohmura, E.; Yamada, K.; Hayakawa, T.; Kinoshita, A.; Matsumoto, K.; Mogami, H. Hippocampal Neurons Become More Vulnerable to Glutamate after Subcritical Hypoxia: An in vitro Study. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1990, 10, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  384. Schinder, A.F.; Olson, E.C.; Spitzer, N.C.; Montal, M. Mitochondrial Dysfunction Is a Primary Event in Glutamate Neurotoxicity. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 6125–6133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  385. Cheung, N.S.; Pascoe, C.J.; Giardina, S.F.; John, C.A.; Beart, P.M. Micromolar l-glutamate induces extensive apoptosis in an apoptotic-necrotic continuum of insult-dependent, excitotoxic injury in cultured cortical neurones. Neuropharmacology 1998, 37, 1419–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  386. Thompson, C. Apoptosis in the pathogenesis and treatment of disease. Science 1995, 267, 1456–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  387. Uren, A.G.; Vaux, D.L. Molecular and clinical aspects of apoptosis. Pharmacol. Ther. 1996, 72, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Glaucoma is a disease where pro-apoptotic signals that develop reach the head of the optic nerve promoting the death of ganglion cells. The aqueous pattern of these subjects reveals the very evident qualitative changes in proteome. This figure shows the results performed by ANTIBODY MICROARRAY in a glaucomatous AH sample. It is probable that these TM-derived proteins, released by damaged TM in the AH, may become biological signals for the retina and, in particular, for the ONH.
Figure 1. Glaucoma is a disease where pro-apoptotic signals that develop reach the head of the optic nerve promoting the death of ganglion cells. The aqueous pattern of these subjects reveals the very evident qualitative changes in proteome. This figure shows the results performed by ANTIBODY MICROARRAY in a glaucomatous AH sample. It is probable that these TM-derived proteins, released by damaged TM in the AH, may become biological signals for the retina and, in particular, for the ONH.
Jcm 09 03172 g001
Figure 2. mtDNA is more susceptible to damage than nuclear DNA; mtDNA mutations have been associated with aging and neurological disorders, as well as several cancers. The main role of the mitochondria is to produce cell ATP. This process is based on OXPHOS, and ROS generation is a by-product of this process. The cAMP/PKA signaling pathway can regulate the activity of OXPHOS through its interaction with AKAP proteins in the mitochondrial membrane, while SIRT proteins, sirtuins, play a fundamental role in restoring homeostasis during stress responses. In fact, sirtuins condition the activity of the NF-κB pathways and the failure of the recovery of homeostasis causes many chronic and acute inflammatory diseases that are connected to altered glycolysis and to the oxidation of fatty acids, at least in part, by the function which is dependent on the NAD + of the sirtuins. Oxidative stress and inflammation, which contribute to endothelial dysfunction in healthy elderly subjects, are the factors, which are absolutely important for the development of glaucoma. Aging is associated with endothelial dysfunction in humans, probably linked to an elevated expression of ET-1 and cyclooxygenase.
Figure 2. mtDNA is more susceptible to damage than nuclear DNA; mtDNA mutations have been associated with aging and neurological disorders, as well as several cancers. The main role of the mitochondria is to produce cell ATP. This process is based on OXPHOS, and ROS generation is a by-product of this process. The cAMP/PKA signaling pathway can regulate the activity of OXPHOS through its interaction with AKAP proteins in the mitochondrial membrane, while SIRT proteins, sirtuins, play a fundamental role in restoring homeostasis during stress responses. In fact, sirtuins condition the activity of the NF-κB pathways and the failure of the recovery of homeostasis causes many chronic and acute inflammatory diseases that are connected to altered glycolysis and to the oxidation of fatty acids, at least in part, by the function which is dependent on the NAD + of the sirtuins. Oxidative stress and inflammation, which contribute to endothelial dysfunction in healthy elderly subjects, are the factors, which are absolutely important for the development of glaucoma. Aging is associated with endothelial dysfunction in humans, probably linked to an elevated expression of ET-1 and cyclooxygenase.
Jcm 09 03172 g002
Figure 3. Under physiological conditions, microglia maintain the synapses and their plasticity but signaling pathways, such as NF-κB, can be activated in various ways. The activated microglia and reactive astrocytes produce ROS and neurotoxic molecules which can lead to neuronal death. In addition, the senescence of microglia and astrocytes causes inflammation and a loss of trophic support. The senescence of the oligodendrocytes reduces the myelin and influences the nerve transmission, while the senescence of the endothelial cells influences the barrier functionality. Reactive astrogliosis with up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine production, excitotoxicity of glutamate and hyperexcitability of neurons may also occur.
Figure 3. Under physiological conditions, microglia maintain the synapses and their plasticity but signaling pathways, such as NF-κB, can be activated in various ways. The activated microglia and reactive astrocytes produce ROS and neurotoxic molecules which can lead to neuronal death. In addition, the senescence of microglia and astrocytes causes inflammation and a loss of trophic support. The senescence of the oligodendrocytes reduces the myelin and influences the nerve transmission, while the senescence of the endothelial cells influences the barrier functionality. Reactive astrogliosis with up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine production, excitotoxicity of glutamate and hyperexcitability of neurons may also occur.
Jcm 09 03172 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vernazza, S.; Tirendi, S.; Bassi, A.M.; Traverso, C.E.; Saccà, S.C. Neuroinflammation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103172

AMA Style

Vernazza S, Tirendi S, Bassi AM, Traverso CE, Saccà SC. Neuroinflammation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(10):3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vernazza, Stefania, Sara Tirendi, Anna Maria Bassi, Carlo Enrico Traverso, and Sergio Claudio Saccà. 2020. "Neuroinflammation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 10: 3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103172

APA Style

Vernazza, S., Tirendi, S., Bassi, A. M., Traverso, C. E., & Saccà, S. C. (2020). Neuroinflammation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(10), 3172. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103172

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop