Next Article in Journal
Circular Economy Concept at the Micro-Level: A Case Study of Taruna Mukti Farmer Group, Bandung Regency, West Java, Indonesia
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria in Improving Yield, Yield Components, and Nutrients Uptake of Barley under Salinity Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Soil Organic Mulching Combined with Aeration Treatment on Soil Quality, Nutrients Content, and Lei Bamboo Shoot Production

State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(3), 536; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030536
Submission received: 29 January 2023 / Revised: 13 February 2023 / Accepted: 16 February 2023 / Published: 23 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Soils)

Abstract

:
Lei bamboo cultivation is an important economic activity in the Zhejiang province of China. However, extensive management practices such as organic mulching aimed at optimizing Lei bamboo production usually have a long-term negative impact on soil pH. Thus, it is important for novel management practices that consider not only bamboo production but also soil quality to be developed. In this study, we evaluated the effect of four conditions: organic mulching combined with aeration (MA), organic mulching and no aeration (MNA), aeration and no mulching (NMA), and control treatment (CK) on soil quality parameters and Lei bamboo shoot production. The Lei bamboo stands have been receiving similar treatments for 3–4 years, but for this study, organic mulch materials (rice husks, stalks, bamboo leaves, non-living plant biomass materials and plants biochar) were reapplied in October 2021 and soil sampling was done in April 2022. Our results showed that the average oxygen content at a sampling depth of 10 cm in CK, MA, and NMA was 21.6%, 21.7%, and 20.7%, respectively. However, when mulching was applied without aeration (MNA), soil oxygen content and pH were decreased by 6.3% and 0.7 units compared to CK. Moreover, for this treatment soil pH was as low as 4.28 at a depth of 30 cm. Nevertheless, when mulching was applied together with aeration (MA), all soil quality parameters, including the contents of organic matter and nitrogen were significantly increased (p < 0.05). For MA, soil pH was generally > 5.0 even at a depth of 30 cm. For all the treatment plots, the number of bamboo shoots that were produced after one month of treatment followed the sequence MA (591.0) > MNA (554.3) > NMA (305.7) > CK (53.3). Even though NMA and MNA treatments both improved bamboo growth by providing the required nutrients, we recommend the combined application of mulching and aeration (MA) for long-term Lei bamboo plantation management since the combination has the potential to improve nutrient supply and bamboo growth while retarding soil acidification.

1. Introduction

The soil is regarded as a major source of nutrients required for plant growth. Thus, ensuring nutrient supply and substrate quality, coupled with the recovery potential and resource recycling and use efficiency of the plants, determine the sustainability of a forest system [1]. The loss of soil fertility from soil erosion and other management practices may increase the use of chemical fertilizers on soils to maintain productivity, which increases economic burdens on the local farmers [2] and deteriorates soil health through acidification [3,4]. To avoid this loss of soil fertility, many soil revitalization practices are available for application to restore soil nutrients, improve soil fertility, and revitalize soil conditions to favor plant growth [5,6]. For example, intensive management practices such as fertilization and organic mulching are frequently applied in Lei bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) plantations to achieve higher production. Nevertheless, heavy winter mulching and high rates of fertilization could significantly enhance soil CO2 efflux in Lei bamboo forests by increasing microbial respiration [7]. In another instance, the oxygenation of subsurface drip-irrigation water was found to improve cotton yield and gross production water-use index by 10% and 7%, respectively [6].
Cultivation and fertilization in Lei bamboo plantations are challenging and require special maneuvering skills to apply chemical fertilizer, land tilling, water management, and cultivation management practices. Hence, a much simpler, cost-effective, and long-term management practice remedy method of soil organic mulching has been adopted and employed in Lei bamboo plantations in recent years [8]. Soil organic mulching can be defined as the application of non-living plant materials at the surface of the soil primarily to prevent the loss of water by evaporation, alter soil nutrients, and improve soil basic conditions. Soil properties and soil conditions that are affected directly or indirectly by soil organic mulching treatment include soil water content (SWC) through increased infiltration, water storage or retention, soil temperature through radiation shielding, soil organic matter (SOM), heat conduction and evaporation cooling, soil temperature moderation, soil nutrients mobility and percolation, soil biological organisms and microorganisms, etc. However, soil organic mulching could prevent proper gaseous exchange between the soil and the atmosphere, resulting in soil hypoxia [8,9] or the lack of oxygen to support and promote the proper growth of Lei bamboo and different plants. Soil organic mulching may also induce soil hypoxia during warming due to the decomposing organic material and fermentation. When there is soil hypoxia in Lei bamboo plantations, a problem of bamboo rhizome up-floating may occur [8].
In plants, transient flooding events, waterlogging and microbial activity in the soil frequently and rapidly lead to hypoxia or oxygen deficiency [10]. Soil hypoxia can also be caused by excessive soil compaction due to machinery, raindrops, and human traffic on soil surfaces. Soil compaction interferes with oxygen movement into the soil because of the loss of macrospore space. The large pores in well-structured soils are important routes for gaseous exchange that can be lost when soils are compacted or have high soil moisture, resulting from excessive irrigation or poor drainage. When soil pores are filled with water, oxygen cannot enter the profile, and the small amounts dissolved in water are rapidly depleted at sites of high metabolic activity [11]. Coupled with other challenges, soil hypoxia is a huge challenge faced by the Lei bamboo farmers. Recent advances suggest that soil hypoxia can be prevented by employing a novel management practice of soil aeration irrigation, where the air is introduced into the soil using buried PVC pipes underneath the soil surface to supply additional air into the soil [12]. Thus, aeration irrigation, a modified irrigation technique that involves injecting air into soils has been extensively proven to improve soil aeration and alleviate hypoxia [12]. Other research conclusions suggest that soil oxygenation mitigates hypoxic conditions in soils by increasing dissolved oxygen content [13] and increase access to oxygen by aeration has positive impacts on plant growth and physiology, even under saline stress [14]. Despite these research advancements, much still needs to be done to fully understand the strengths and weaknesses of aeration irrigation. For example, how well can aeration irrigation technology perform in conjunction with soil organic mulching or can it mitigate hypoxia in Lei bamboo plantation under soil organic mulching management? Thus, our main objective was to determine the effects of soil organic mulching combined with aeration irrigation on Lei bamboo shoot production, soil pH, soil oxygen content and temperature, soil water content (SWC), and soil physicochemical properties. To fully explore changes in these parameters, we considered variations around the plant rhizospheres at different radii distances (5, 15 and 25 cm) at different soil depths (10, 20 and 30 cm), and in two different aeration irrigation directions (perpendicular direction, PD and horizontal direction, HD).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

The experiment research site is located in Taihu Yuan modern agriculture and forestry experimental site in the Lin’an district of Hangzhou city, Zhejiang province in China (30°14′ N, 119°42′ E). The climate belongs to the northern subtropical monsoon region with a mean rainfall of 1420 mm, mean temperature of 15.2 °C, annual sunshine of 1939 h and 234 days without frost per year. The landform is hilly, with hills mostly lower than 150 m. According to the US Department of Agriculture Classification System, the soil is a Ferrosol (USDA 1999) and is derived from sandstone. Zhejiang province has been an important production region of Lei bamboo in China for many years and the bamboo industry has significantly contributed to the economy of the province and farmers’ livelihoods.
For this study, four different experimental plots were prepared at the research experiment site: (I) Control plot (CK): which was neither treated with organic mulching materials nor aerated with air from the aeration irrigation system setup; (II) Mulched and aerated plot (MA): This plot was treated with organic mulching materials of rice husks, stalks, bamboo leaves, non-living plant biomass materials and plants biochar. It was also aerated with compressed air from the aeration irrigation system setup; (III) Non-mulched aerated plot (NMA): this plot was not treated with any organic mulching materials but was aerated; (IV) Mulched non-aerated plot (MNA): this plot was only treated with organic mulching materials but was not aerated. The layer of the organic mulching material was 15 cm thick and added at the top of the soil surface. Each of these plots was 10 m × 10 m in size (containing > 100 bamboo plants) and made in three replications. Within the plots, three bamboo plants were selected for sampling (Figure 1 and Figure S1). The plots have been receiving similar treatments for over 3–4 years, but for this study, sampling was done in April 2022 after treatments were renewed in October 2021.

2.2. Soil Sampling

During sampling, soil composite samples were collected from soil depths of 10, 20, and 30 cm and corresponding distances of 5, 15, and 25 cm from the Lei bamboo plant trunks. Three Lei bamboo plants were selected for sampling from each plot of the four different soil treatment conditions (CK, MA, NMA, and MNA). The direction of sample collection was either towards the perpendicular direction (PD) or horizontal direction (HD), taking the reference point from the beneath sub-surface laid aeration PVC pipes at a depth of 60 cm from the soil surface (Figure 1). In this experiment, the parameters of interest were soil oxygen, soil temperature, soil pH condition, soil water content (SWC), soil organic material (SOM), soil total nitrogen (TN), soil total phosphorus (TP), and potassium (K) content.

2.3. Bamboo Shoot Yield and Morphology

The Lei bamboo shoots’ yield/production in each treatment was investigated at three different intervals in November 2021 (first week, second week, and fourth week, Figure S1 and Table 1). This is the period when Lei bamboo plants start to produce shoots for harvest by the farmers for consumption and economic activities as a source of income for their livelihood. This is an important aspect of economic modeling for the bamboo industry. The number of shoots was counted in each plot and the mean was calculated. Three bamboo shoots were carefully selected as experiment specimens from the three subdivided plots in one soil treatment. Thus, a total of nine bamboo shoots were selected from each soil treatment plot. The bamboo shoots were carefully cut from underground on the node junction with the rhizome using a special harvesting flat-curved end metal bar, washed and taken to the laboratory for experimental investigations. The heights and diameters were then taken using a composite fiber LCD electronic digital vernier caliper serial (SL01F1C, CE RoHS, CE, Hangzhou China). The shoots were weighed fresh and the averages were calculated.

2.4. Analytical Methods

Soil oxygen content (%) and temperature (°C) were measured using an electrode platinum oxygen analyzer (PreSens, Precision Sensing, GmbH Microx 4 SAF0012000131, Regensburg, Germany). Oxygen and temperature measurements were obtained by inserting the probes into the soil at three different soil layers 10, 20, and 30 cm and at the corresponding distances of 5, 15, and 25 cm from the Lei bamboo plant trunks in two different directions i.e., PD and HD.
The soil pH was determined from the air-dried soil samples. The air-dried soil samples were sieved through a 2.0 mm sieve to remove coarse debris. Soil pH values were then determined from a soil:reverse osmosis (RO) water suspension (1:2.5, w:v) using a pH combination electrode conductivity ion meter at 20 °C (Mettler Toledo, Seven compact model number MO162). To determine SWC, 3.0 g of air-dried soil was put into aluminium containers and weighed. Weights of containers with lids at different stages were noted accordingly before and after drying the soil samples using the laboratory electric oven for 8 h at 105 °C. The SWC on a wet-weight basis was then calculated using the soil water content formula (Equation (1)):
SWC   ( % ) = W 2 W 3 W 2 W 1     100
where W1—is the weight of aluminum tin with lid; W2—is the weight of aluminum tin with lid and soil sample before drying; and W3—is the weight of aluminum tin with lid and sample after drying.
To determine the soil organic matter (SOM) content, air-dried soil samples were ground to pass through a 0.1 mm sieve. A 0.3 g portion was then mixed with 5 mL of KCl followed by 5 mL of sulfuric acid H2SO4. Then, 56 g of FeSO4·7H2O dissolved in 100 mL of RO water was added. The solution was then thoroughly mixed to obtain a homogeneous mixture with dissolved and digested contents. Using a laboratory electric oven, the solution samples were heated for 1 h 50 min at 110 °C. Potassium dichromate and ferrous sulphate solutions were prepared with RO water and used as part of the experiment reagents. Then using the displacement calculation method, the soil organic material contents were calculated and determined in the soil samples in percentages [15].
Total nitrogen was analyzed using a nitrogen analyzer (Foss Kjeltec 8400 SN91887894, 2021, Denmark). 1 g of air-dried soil was sieved with a 0.9 mm sieve and thoroughly mixed with a 1.1 g composite of K2SO4 + CuSO4 + Se (100:10:1). 4 mL of concentrated H2SO4 was added into the test tubes and left static for 15 h. Afterwards, a LabTech heating block rack equipment (DIGIBLOCK EHD 36-itouch S/N 18114X1568) was used to heat the samples in the test tubes at three heating phases of 50 °C, 100 °C, and 300 °C. Soil total nitrogen parameters were then determined using the standard procedure of the equipment and calculated using Equation (2):
ϖ ( N ) = ( V V o )     c     M   10 3 m
where ϖ ( N ) is the soil total nitrogen value in mg N kg−1, c is the sulfuric acid (½H2SO4) standard solution concentration (M), V is the volume of added sulfuric acid in mL, V o is the initial volume of sulfuric acid added in mL, M is the nitrogen mole to mass ratio 14 g mol−1, m is the soil sample weight in g, 10 3 is the conversion factor of mL into L.
Soil total phosphorus content was determined by the INDIGO-BLUE color determination method using a special UV-ray spectrophotometer equipment (model UV-2600 220V CH VIS, A11665030096CS, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) installed with a UV probe software version 2.42. First, 0.2 g of fine soil samples were treated with 6 mL of nitric acid and 2 mL of hydrofluoric acid and thoroughly mixed. The samples were then left to decompose and react for 20 h. Thereafter, samples were digested for 1 h using a CEM MARS 6 CLASSIC decomposition/digesting equipment (model number: 91098, serial number: 5352, Matthews, NC, USA). The samples were heated to 160 °C for another 1 h to further chromatographically digest and evaporate the hydrofluoric acid from the sample solution. The complete experimental procedures can be found in previous literature [15]. The content of total phosphorus in % was then estimated using Equation (3):
ϖ ( P ) = ρ   V   ts   10 6 m 100
where ϖ ( P ) —the soil total phosphorus value in %, ρ —function curve of the indigo-blue chemical liquid concentration, in mg kg−1, V —indigo-blue volume capacity in mL, ts —extraction multiple factors, 10 6 —conversion value. The soil total potassium was determined using a Thermo Fisher Scientific optical emission chromatography and mass ICP-OES spectrometer (iCAP PRO, iCAPPRO60405, Qtegra version 2.11.4776.211, Hanna-Kunath-str. 11,28199 Bremen, Germany) after the soil samples were extracted with 1 M NH4-acetate solution [15]. The experimental results are reported as the mean ± standard error. The means were subjected to a one-way ANOVA to test if there were significant differences between the treatments at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Variations in Soil Oxygen Content with Soil Depth and Distance from the Bamboo Trunk

Figure 2 shows that there were significant differences (p < 0.05) in oxygen content between the soils of MNA at a soil depth of 10 cm with CK, MA and NMA, both in PD and HD directions, while no significant differences were observed between CK, MA and NMA. The average oxygen content in CK, MA, and NMA was 21.6%, 21.7%, and 20.7%, respectively, while there was a negative effect and reduction in soil oxygen content by 6.3% when the soil was mulched but not aerated (MNA). When the soil depth was increased to 20 cm in both PD and HD directions, the average oxygen content in CK, MA, NMA, and MNA was 18.9%, 20.62%, 20.5%, and 17.9%, respectively. There was a positive significant difference in oxygen contents between CK, MA, and NMA but not between CK and MNA in the PD direction. Further down to 30 cm, the average oxygen content in CK, MA, NMA, and MNA was 17.3%, 19.3%, 19.9%, and 16.7%, respectively. This shows that there was a positive significant difference in oxygen content between plots MA and NMA relative to CK but a negative significant difference between MNA and CK. Thus, irrespective of the treatment, soil oxygen content decreased with depth, suggesting that plant roots get exposed to a lower amount of oxygen as they grow further downwards.
At a distance of 5 cm from the Lei bamboo trunk in both PD and HD directions and symmetrical to the aeration pipes, the average soil oxygen content in CK, MA, NMA, and MNA was 19.3%, 20.4%, 20.4%, and 18.3%, respectively. At this distance, there was a positive significant difference between plots MA and NMA relative to CK but a negative significant difference between MNA and CK. Compared to CK, treatments that received mulching and aeration (MA) or only aeration (NMA) experienced an increase in oxygen content of 5.7% and 5.2%, respectively. At a distance of 15 cm, the oxygen content in CK, MA, NMA, and MNA was 19.3%, 20.4%, 20.6%, and 18.3%. Accordingly, there was an increase in the oxygen content by 5.8% in MA and 7.1% in NMA, but a 4.9% decrease in MNA. Unlike at different depths where oxygen content decreased with depth, there was little variation with distance from the tree trunk. This was evident as at a distance of 25 cm, the oxygen content in CK, MA, NMA, and MNA was 19.3%, 20.5%, 21.2%, and 18.4%, respectively. There were positive significant differences in plots MA and NMA and a negative significant difference in MNA. In both MA (6.2%) and NMA (9.7%), there was a positive increase in the oxygen content in the soil and this was more than the oxygen concentration in ambient air. This observation was probably induced by the artificial aeration technique. Nevertheless, there was a negative effect and a 4.6% reduction in soil oxygen content in MNA treatment.

3.2. Variations in Soil Temperature with Soil Depth and Distance from the Bamboo Trunk

Figure 3 shows that at a soil depth of 10 cm, there was a significant difference in temperature between plot MNA and the other treatments. The average soil temperature was 13.4 °C in CK, 13.4 °C in MA, 13.1 °C in NMA, and 15.3 °C in MNA, with an average percentage increase of 14.0% in MNA compared to CK. When soil depth was 20 cm, there were significant differences between CK, MA, and MNA but not with NMA. CK had an average soil temperature of 7.2 °C, 11.5 °C for MA, 6.1 °C for NMA, and 13.7 °C for MNA. At this depth, there was a 59.4% increase in soil temperature in MA and 89.5% in MNA compared to CK. The soil average temperature continued to decrease as the sampling depth was increased to 30 cm. Specifically, the soil average temperature was decreased to 4.3 °C in CK, 10.4 °C in MA, 4.2 °C in NMA, and 11.0 °C in MNA. Comparatively, there was an average percentage increase in soil temperature of 140.6% in MA and 154.1% in MNA relative to CK at the 30 cm depth.
The average soil temperature in plot CK was 8.3 °C, 11.8 °C in MA, 7.8 °C in NMA, and 13.4 °C in MNA at a distance of 5 cm from the bamboo plant trunk in both PD and HD directions. Relative to CK, soil temperature was increased by 43.1% in MA and 61.4% in MNA. At 15 cm from the bamboo trunk, MA and MNA showed significant differences in soil temperature compared to CK while NMA did not. There was an average increase in soil temperature of 42.4% in MA and 60.1% in MNA relative to CK. The changing trend observed in soil temperature at 15 cm was also observed at 25 cm. Specifically, a 37.7% and 56.3% increase in soil temperature was recorded in MA and MNA relative to CK, respectively. These results show that soil mulching increased soil temperature both vertically and horizontally and aerating the soil mitigated this increase. Nevertheless, for the same treatment, soil temperature significantly decreased with depth but remained almost similar at the horizontal distance from the bamboo trunk.

3.3. Variations in Soil pH with Soil Depth, Distance from the Bamboo Trunk, and Treatment

Figure 4 shows variations in soil pH with depth and distance from the bamboo trunk. At a soil depth of 10 cm, there were no significant differences in soil pH between CK, MA, and NMA in the PD direction unlike in the HD direction. Compared to CK, MA experienced a slight increase of 0.17 units while NMA and MNA both recorded a decrease of 0.32 and 0.74 units, respectively. When the soil depth was increased to 20 cm, the soil pH was significantly lower compared to that at 10 cm depth. At this depth, the average soil pH values were 5.57, 5.78, 5.83, and 4.96 for CK, MA, NMA, and MNA. Furthermore, the soil pH was further decreased to 4.75, 5.30, 4.96, and 4.28 for CK, MA, NMA, and MNA at a soil depth of 30 cm.
In both PD and HD aeration directions and 5 cm away from the tree trunk, soil pH in CK was 5.85, which was 0.46 and 0.23 units lower than in MA and NMA but 0.70 units higher than in MNA. At 15 cm away from the bamboo trunk in both PD and HD directions, the average soil pH in CK was decreased to 5.54 and was still lower relative to MA and NMA but higher than in MNA. At 25 cm, soil pH in CK was slightly recovered compared to that at 15 cm while that in MA, NMA, and MNA maintained their decreasing trend. Generally, the average soil pH was 5.73, 5.85, 5.58, and 4.90 for CK, MA, NMA, and MNA, respectively (Figure 4). As evident, soil mulching without aeration (MNA) negatively impacted soil pH while mulching in combination with aeration (MA) retarded pH decline at different depth and distance from the bamboo trunk.
For the respective treatments at different depths and directions (PD and HD), soil pH generally showed a significant decreasing trend (Figure S2). This decrease was even more significant for treatments that received mulching without aeration (MNA) and for CK. For CK in the PD direction, the pH at 10 cm was 6.80, which decreased by 1.12 and 2.06 units at 20 and 30 cm, respectively. Similarly, in the HD direction, soil pH at 20 and 30 cm was 1.33 and 2.03 units lower than for CK. When the soil was mulched and aerated (MA), the highest pH of all the treatments was recorded to be pH 7.01 at 10 cm in the PD direction. This was decreased to 5.91 and 5.41 at depths of 20 and 30 cm, respectively. The changing trend of pH in the HD direction followed a similar trend of 10 cm (pH 6.93) > 20 cm (pH 5.65) > 30 cm (pH 5.20). Relative to CK, MA, and NMA, the treatment that received mulching with no aeration (MNA) had the lowest pH in both the PD and HD directions. For instance, at 10, 20, and 30 cm in the PD direction for MNA, soil pH was 6.21, 5.13, and 4.36, with corresponding values of 5.90, 4.78, and 4.20 in the HD direction, respectively. As the soil pH decreased with sampling depth (to pH < 5.0), the bamboo plant growth could be inhibited by aluminum toxicity [16] and the negative effect would be most significant for CK, NMA, and MNA.

3.4. Variations in Soil Water (SWC) and Organic Matter Contents with Soil Depth, Distance from the Bamboo Trunk, and Treatment

There was little variation in the SWC at the same depth for all treatments (Figure 5). Nevertheless, for the same treatment and either in the HD or PD direction, SWC decreased with depth from 10 to 30 cm. According to the results, only the soil sample from CK at point HD30 cm showed a significant difference in SWC compared with the other treatments at all points. The average SWC for all treatments (i.e., CK, MA, NMA and MNA) at different soil depths was 3.5% at 10 cm, 3.0% at 20 cm, and 2.9% at 30 cm. Moving away from the bamboo trunk at a radius of 5 cm, the average SWC was 2.8%, 3.7%, 3.3%, and 2.99%, at 15 cm, the average SWC was 2. 9%, 3.5%, 3.1%, and 3.1% while at 25 cm it was 2.9%, 3.4%, 3.0%, and 3.0% for CK, MA, NMA, and MNA, respectively. As shown, MA and NMA treatments had a negative impact on SWC as the radius from the bamboo trunk was increased.
The content of soil organic matter showed significant variations between CK and MA at all the sampling depths and distances from the bamboo trunk (Figure 6). For the different treatments, the average SOM content in CK was 3.7%, 5.9% in MA, 4.3% in NMA, and 4.9% in MNA at 10 cm. Relative to CK, the SOM at 10 cm depth was increased by 60.4%, 16.3%, and 32.8% for MA, NMA, and MNA, respectively. This trend was similar at 20 and 30 cm depths but with decreased SOM under each treatment. For example, at 20 cm, the average SOM content was 3.0% in CK, 5.0% in MA, 3.8% in NMA, and 3.9% in MNA. Nevertheless, compared to the other treatments, MA induced the most significant increase of 65.6% relative to CK while at 30 cm, this increase was estimated to be 80.9% in the PD direction. When sampling was done at increasing radii away from the bamboo trunk, there were no significant differences between different depths of the same treatment. However, between the different treatments, MA induced the most significant increment in SOM content at the respective radius. At 5 cm from the bamboo trunk, MNA HD also induced a significant difference relative to CK, suggesting that with or without aeration, mulching had a significant impact on SOM content. The average SOM content for the different treatments at this radius was 3.0%, 5.2%, 3.2%, and 3.7% for CK, MA, NMA, and MNA, respectively. Overall, there was a 73.9% and 34.0% increment in SOM induced by MA and MNA (HD 5 cm) compared to CK. At a radius of 15 cm, MA exhibited the most significant increment in SOM of 67.9%, while at 25 cm, both MA and MNA (HD) induced an increase of 53.1% and 55.3%, respectively.

3.5. Variations in Soil Nutrients (NPK) with Soil Depth, Distance from the Bamboo Trunk, and Treatment

The content of soil total nitrogen (TN) decreased with sampling depth for all treatments (Figure 7). At 10 cm, there were no significant differences in TN content in either the HD and PD directions. At 10 cm, the average soil TN was 1930, 2519.3, 2463.1, and 2700.2 mg kg−1 for CK, MA, NMA, and MNA, respectively. In the HD direction, MNA and MA induced a 39.9% and 34.0% increment in TN compared to CK. Even at a soil depth of 20 cm, CK still had the least content of TN, with an average value of 1473.5 mg kg−1 compared to 1971.5, 1814.0, and 1768.9 mg kg−1 for MA, NMA, and MNA, respectively. In the PD direction, the average increase in TN induced by MA at 20 cm was 41.0% while it was 36.8% for NMA PD at 20 cm and 36.3% for MNA. At a depth of 30 cm, the average content of TN followed the sequence MA (1336.4 mg kg−1) > CK (1143.4 mg kg−1) > NMA (1015.6 mg kg−1) > MNA (827.7 mg kg−1). In addition, sampling at a radius of 5 cm, MA and NMA showed positive significant differences in TN relative to CK (PD direction). Here, the average TN contents followed the sequence CK (1574.5 mg kg−1) < MNA (1790.0 mg kg−1) < NMA (1891.4 mg kg−1) < MA (2056.5 mg kg−1), while at 15 cm the trend was CK (1533.6 mg kg−1) < NMA (1660.8 mg kg−1) < MNA (1790.5 mg kg−1) < MA (1946.08 mg kg−1) and at 25 cm it was CK (1438.9 mg kg−1) < MNA (1719.5 mg kg−1) < NMA (1742.1 mg kg−1) < MA (1824.5 mg kg−1). As shown, only the CK and MA treatments showed decreasing trends in TN as sampling radii were increased while NMA treatments recovered after an initial decrease from 10–15 cm. Nevertheless, all the treatments showed the potential of improving soil TN content.
Figure 8 shows variations in soil phosphorus with treatments, depth, and distance away from the plant. The average soil total phosphorus in the respective treatments was 0.58%, 0.34%, 0.59%, and 0.61% at 10 cm for CK, MA, NMA, and MNA, respectively. The corresponding phosphorus content was 0.69%, 0.41%, 0.68%, and 0.52% at 20 cm and 0.51%, 0.30%, 0.33%, and 0.27% at 30 cm for CK, MA, NMA, and MNA, respectively. The resulting trend shows that soil phosphorus in CK, MA, and NMA increased from 10 to 20 cm depth and then decreased thereafter while MNA showed a continuous decrease with depth. According to the results, the observed variations in phosphorus content with depth were also observed at an increasing distance away from the bamboo trunk. At 5 cm from the bamboo trunk and 10 cm depth, the average value of total phosphorus was 0.64%, 0.28%, 0.62%, and 0.50%. The MA treatment induced the most significant reduction of 58.1% compared to CK (HD direction). At 25 cm and 30 cm depth, MA induced a 65.5% reduction in the average value of total phosphorus. This result shows the mulching treatments generally had a negative impact on soil phosphorus and together with aeration, the impact became more significant.
At 10 cm, soil total potassium did not exhibit any significant differences between the different treatments (Figure S3). Nevertheless, at a soil depth of 20 cm, there was a significant difference between CK (PD direction) and NMA, with a total potassium increment of 27.6%. At a soil depth of 30 cm, similar results were obtained as the latter, with a total potassium increment of 21.1% in NMA. For this treatment, the total potassium was also increased by 38.1% and 18.9% at 5 and 15 cm in the PD aeration direction away from the bamboo trunk, respectively. Generally, there was less variation in the content of total potassium induced by the treatments relative to CK compared to those observed for nitrogen and phosphorus. Figure S4 shows that there is a significant (R2 < 0.999) polynomic relationship between the average values of SOM, pH, and nutrients (N, P, and K) at 10 cm. This relationship was observed even at 20 and 30 cm (result not shown) depths and at different distances from the bamboo trunk. Thus, it can be inferred that the variations (decrease or increase) in soil pH, SOM, and nutrients were a result of the different treatments.

3.6. Bamboo Rhizome Yield and Growth Parameters

Figure S1 and Table 1 show that after one month of sprouting, there was a significant (p < 0.05) difference in the number of fully grown bamboo shoots ready for harvest between CK and the other treatments. The average number of shoots per treatment followed the sequence MA (591.0) > MNA (554.3) > NMA (305.7) > CK (53.3). In addition, there were positive significant differences in the shoot height, diameter, and fresh weight. Bamboo shoots from plots MA, NMA, and MNA exhibited larger dimensions and quality than bamboo shoots from CK (Figure 9). This result shows that organic mulching with/without aeration provided optimum conditions required for bamboo growth. Nevertheless, organic mulching with aeration should be adopted to achieve maximum economic benefits and preserve soil health. This observation agrees with the improvement magnitude of soil quality parameters induced by the different treatments.

4. Discussion

The roots of most plant species require a good supply of oxygen to satisfy their water and nutrient needs [10,17]. This is because roots need adequate oxygen for root respiration as well as for a healthy metabolic function. Thus, amelioration of an anoxic/hypoxic root zone to improve effective soil aeration is crucial for improving plant performance. Our experimental results show that treatments (CK and MNA) which did not receive aeration generally contained lower oxygen contents relative to those (MA and NMA) that were aerated (Figure 2). In the absence of aeration, the application of organic mulching materials in MNA demonstrated significant adverse effects on soil oxygen content and this effect increased with soil depth. According to previous studies, the large pores in a well-structured soil are important avenues for gas exchange with the atmosphere and plants grown on soils that are poorly aerated suffer from stunted growth due to water and nutrient deficiencies [11,13,18]. The application of organic mulching material probably inhibited gaseous exchange between the soil and the atmosphere by sealing the soil’s top surface and causing soil oxygen deficiency, which may become hazardous to plants in severe cases. For all the treatments, soil depth had an adverse effect on soil oxygen content, suggesting a slower diffusion of oxygen from the atmosphere to deeper soil layers as the sampling depth was increased from 10 to 30 cm.
Long-term (3–4 year) field studies have demonstrated that continuous organic mulching without adequate aeration could cause Lei bamboo rhizome up-floating, where the rhizomes floated to the surface of 0–10 cm soil layer to cause bamboo growth to recede [8]. Plant roots cannot obtain enough energy to maintain health and normal physiological activity under hypoxic conditions. Thus, soil management practices that improve aeration are important for plant growth and ensuring food security. In their study, Li et al. [14] suggested that applying artificial aeration to soils has the advantage of increasing the content of dissolved oxygen which overturns the negative effects of hypoxia stress on plants. As shown in Figure 2, aeration-treated plots MA and NMA at distances 5, 15, and 25 cm from the bamboo trunk, showed elevated oxygen levels that were significantly higher than those of non-aerated plots (MNA and CK) and the ambient air oxygen concentration. Thus, combining aeration treatment with organic mulching can alleviate the negative impact of organic mulching on soil oxygen content.
The uptake of water and nutrients and consequently plant growth is highly affected by the root-zone temperature. It has been observed that the growth of Cucumis sativus L. under different root-zone temperatures showed different response rates to nutrient uptake and consequently, the plant’s fresh and dry weights were different [19]. Our results (Figure 3) show that at soil depths of 10 to 30 cm, soil temperature was significantly higher in the mulched non-aerated plot (MNA) than in any other plot. This was probably due to the reduced gaseous exchange between the mulched soil and the atmosphere. Nevertheless, combining organic mulching and aeration (MA) induced a cooling effect that decreased the soil temperature by 14.2%, 19.1%, and 5.8% at depths of 10, 20, and 30 cm, respectively, compared to the non-aerated treatment (MNA). In their study, Liu et al. [7] observed that organic mulching altered soil temperature by increasing microbial respiration rate. This means that organic mulching materials promote microbial life and population growth by providing the nutrients required for growth. Therefore, an increase in the microbial population implies an equal increase in heat production and enzymatic activities [20] associated with microbial respiration. Other avenues for heat production during mulching could be linked to chemical processes such as decomposition and fermentation of the added organic materials.
Soil pH is an important soil parameter that regulates nutrient availability and other important functions of the soil. Continuous planting of Lei bamboo under intensive management practices for extended periods tends to enhance nutrient accumulation within the soil while significantly decreasing soil pH [21]. This condition may be aggravated during high inputs of chemical fertilizer and the excretion of organic acids by bamboo roots [22]. Under such practices, the content of soil exchangeable aluminum increases as the soil pH decreases, which becomes detrimental to plant growth due to inhibited root elongation [16,23]. In this study, soil pH (Figure 4) was significantly lower for the mulched and non-aerated treatment (MNA), and the magnitude of pH decrease was increased with sampling depth. Combined with the high temperature of this treatment (Figure 3), we infer that organic material decomposition in the MNA treatment produced organic molecules with a pH-decreasing effect compared to when mulching was applied simultaneously with aeration. This inference is supported by the significant relationship that exists between SOM and soil pH (Figure S4). Therefore, to preserve Lei bamboo plantations and ensure economic sustainability, organic mulching combined with aeration is a good management practice to alleviate severe soil acidification of Lei bamboo soils.
The movement of water in unsaturated soils is an important concern for the rational use of water and soil resources to ensure food security without degrading environmental health. Soil hydraulic properties such as the retention and hydraulic capacities as well as gas conductivity have agronomical and ecological implications [24]. Thus, an increase in soil bulk density induces changes to soil pore-size distribution that affect the ability of the soil to shrink and conduct water under unsaturated conditions. Simply put, the relative proportion of the three phases of soil (water, gas, and solid) is influenced by soil texture and structure, biological activity, weather, and management practices [25]. Our results (Figure 5) show that only CK in the HD direction and at a depth of 30 cm exhibited a significant reduction in SWC compared with samples from the other treatments at all different soil depths. Even though the differences in SWC were not significant, the MA and NMA treatments slightly increased the SWC compared to CK. These findings suggest that even though mulching treatments tend to increase soil temperature, they can do so without compromising the water needed for plant growth.
SOM is an important component in ecosystems and forms an essential part of a set of relevant processes that contribute to climate change [26]. Beyond its role in climate change, SOM plays an important part in improving soil fertility and sustaining soil productivity [27]. Our results (Figure 6) show that applying mulching and aeration (MA) maintained a healthy pool of SOM even at a depth of 30 cm and a distance of 25 cm from the bamboo trunk, suggesting that top soils in the MA plot were richer in humus than in other plots. Even though the mulching and non-aerated (MNA) treatment showed a larger SOM relative to CK, its effect on SOM decreased with depth. These findings are consistent with other studies which earlier reported significant correlations between mulching treatment, organic carbon, and available nutrients [7,28], with the contents of organic carbon and nutrients being higher on the surface than in subsurface soils [28].
During the decomposition of labile SOM, soil respiration and temperature increase [7,29]. As a result, nutrient elements that were bound to different functional moieties are released and made available to plants as well as leaching agents. Thus, as erosion forces set in, they may erode both the content of SOM [30] and nutrients. Nitrogen is an important nutrient required for plant growth. The application of exogenous N to soils can alter soil N availability and/or induce soil acidification [31,32]. Soil organic N can be converted by microorganisms through ammonification, nitrification, and denitrification to forms (NH4+-N and NO3-N) that can be easily absorbed by plants [33,34]. Our results show (Figure 7) that at soil depth 10–20 cm, all the treatments demonstrated positive effects on the content of total N, with the effect being most significant in the PD direction relative to CK. Nevertheless, at 30 cm, MNA and NMA induced negative effects on N content in the HD direction relative to CK. Even when sampling was done away from the bamboo trunk, all the treatments demonstrated similar effects on total N. Contrary to total N, the content of phosphorus was negatively impacted by most of the treatments relative to CK (Figure 8) while the content of potassium was increased in most instances (Figure S3) even though not significantly in some. Compared to CK, all other treatments had reduced average phosphorus content except at 10 cm for MNA and 20 cm for NMA. For instance, the average phosphorus content in MA and MNA (HD direction) was reduced by 53.2% and 47.7% at 20 cm relative to CK, respectively, while at 30 cm, the average reduction rate reached 67% for MNA compared to CK. The overall negative effect of mulching and aeration (MA) was significant compared to the other treatments.
The overall effect of soil management practices is often quantified based on soil quality parameters and plant growth. When a soil management practice improves soil nutrient content but enhances soil acidification, it becomes detrimental to plant growth in the long term. In such instances, other soil amendments are required to lime the soil and increase soil pH, which increases the general cost of production. In this study, the application of organic mulching (MNA) decreased soil oxygen content and pH (Figure 2 and Figure 4) but maintained a favorable temperature and water environment (Figure 3 and Figure 5) compared to CK. When applied with aeration (MA), all these parameters, including the contents of SOM and nitrogen (Figure 6 and Figure 7) were significantly improved. This improvement in the determined parameters translated to a significant increase in the number of bamboo shoots and recorded growth parameters (Figure 9, Table 1 and Figure S1). For example, the number of bamboo shoots increased by 968%, 452%, and 902% in MA, NMA, and MNA relative to CK (Table 1 and Figure S1). Despite the improvement of bamboo growth in NMA and MNA treatments, we recommend the use of mulching and aeration (MA) for long-term cultivation given that this combination has the potential to retard soil pH decrease better than the other treatments.

5. Conclusions

The negative impact of organic mulching on soil quality parameters such as oxygen content and pH can be mitigated by a combined application of organic mulching and aeration in Lei bamboo plantations. Even though organic mulching alone can increase bamboo shoot production by 902%, its long-term effect on soil pH needs to be taken into consideration. Compared to organic mulching alone, mulching combined with aeration can improve Lei bamboo shoot production by an additional 6.6% while maintaining soil pH above 5.0 even at depths of 30 cm as opposed to 4.28 for the latter. This study provides both a theoretical and practical guide for improving soil quality and plant growth quality for improved yield/production, thus ensuring sustainable cultivation in Lei bamboo plantations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agriculture13030536/s1, Figure S1: Overview of the different plots and the average effect of different treatments on the number of bamboo shoots per plot. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, Figure S2: Effects of soil depth variations on soil pH in each treatment plot. The bars are standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05; Figure S3: Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil total potassium content. The bars are standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05; Figure S4: The polynomial relationship between change in average soil organic matter (SOM) content with average soil available nutrients (N, P, K) and soil pH at 10 cm sampling depth.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G. and S.D.; methodology, D.M.; software, D.M.; validation, R.G., S.D. and D.M.; formal analysis, D.M.; investigation, D.M.; resources, R.G.; data curation, D.M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.; writing—review and editing, D.M.; visualization, D.M.; supervision, R.G.; project administration, R.G.; funding acquisition, R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose”, R & D Program of Zhejiang (No. 2022C02054).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest and the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Embaye, K.; Weih, M.; Ledin, S.; Christersson, L. Biomass and nutrient distribution in a highland bamboo forest in southwest Ethiopia: Implications for management. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 204, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, X.; Xiao, P.; Niu, J.; Chen, X. Evaluating soil and nutrients (C, N, and P) loss in Chinese Torreya plantations. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yan, P.; Wu, L.; Wang, D.; Fu, J.; Shen, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Fan, L.; Wenyan, H. Soil acidification in Chinese tea plantations. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 715, 136963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fujii, K. Soil acidification and adaptations of plants and microorganisms in Bornean tropical forests. Ecol. Res. 2014, 29, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Li, Y.; Jia, Z.; Niu, W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M. Effect of post-infiltration soil aeration at different growth stages on growth and fruit quality of drip-irrigated potted tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Pendergast, L.; Bhattarai, S.P.; Midmore, D.J. Benefits of oxygation of subsurface drip-irrigation water for cotton in a Vertosol. Crop. Pasture Sci. 2013, 64, 1171–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, M.; Liu, J.; Jiang, C.; Wu, M.; Song, R.; Gui, R.; Jia, J.; Li, Z. Improved nutrient status affects soil microbial biomass, respiration, and functional diversity in a Lei bamboo plantation under intensive management. J. Soils Sediments 2016, 17, 917–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, M.; Zhuang, S.; Gui, R. Soil hypoxia induced by an organic-material mulching technique stimulates the bamboo rhizome up-floating of Phyllostachys praecox. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Peterson, M.S. Hypoxia-induced physiological changes in two mangrove swamp fishes: Sheepshead minnow, Cyprinodon variegatus lacepede and sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna (lesueur). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Physiol. 1990, 97, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pucciariello, C.; Banti, V.; Perata, P. ROS signaling as common element in low oxygen and heat stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 59, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Costello, L.R.; Macdonald, J.D.; Jacobs, K.A. Soil Aeration and Tree Health: Correlating Soil Oxygen Measurements with the Decline of Established Oaks. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Oak Woodlands and Hardwood Rangeland Management; Davis, CA, USA, 31 October–2 November 1990, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-126; Forest Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Southwest Research Station: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1991; pp. 295–299. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, H.; Shang, Z.; Cai, H.; Zhu, Y. Irrigation combined with aeration promoted soil respiration through increasing soil mi-crobes, enzymes, and crop growth in tomato fields. Catalysts 2019, 9, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Pendergast, L.; Bhattarai, S.; Midmore, D. Evaluation of aerated subsurface drip irrigation on yield, dry weight partitioning and water use efficiency of a broad-acre chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a vertosol. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 217, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, Y.; Niu, W.; Cao, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Duan, X.; Zhang, Z. Effect of soil aeration on root morphology and photosynthetic charac-teristics of potted tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) at different NaCl salinity levels. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Pansu, M.; Gautheyrou, J. Handbook of Soil Analysis: Mineralogical, Organic and Inorganic Methods; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 1–993. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shi, R.Y.; Ni, N.; Nkoh, J.N.; Dong, Y.; Zhao, W.R.; Pan, X.Y.; Li, J.Y.; Xu, R.K.; Qian, W. Biochar retards Al toxicity to maize (Zea mays L.) during soil acid-ification: The effects and mechanisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 719, 137448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bhattarai, S.P.; Pendergast, L.; Midmore, D.J. Root aeration improves yield and water use efficiency of tomato in heavy clay and saline soils. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 108, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, J.W.; Lee, B.S.; Kang, J.G.; Bae, J.H.; Ku, Y.G.; Gorinstein, S.; Lee, J.H. Effect of root zone aeration on the growth and bioactivity of cucumber plants cultured in perlite substrate. Biologia 2014, 69, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yan, Q.; Duan, Z.; Mao, J.; Li, X.; Dong, F. Effects of root-zone temperature and N, P, and K supplies on nutrient uptake of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings in hydroponics. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 58, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Picariello, E.; Baldantoni, D.; Izzo, F.; Langella, A.; De Nicola, F. Soil organic matter stability and microbial community in relation to different plant cover: A focus on forests characterizing Mediterranean area. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 162, 103897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gui, R.; Sun, X.; Zhuang, S. Soil Acidification in Phyllostachys praecox f. preveynalis Cultivation with Intensive Management. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2013, 44, 3235–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gui, R.; Wu, W.; Zhuang, S.; Zhong, Z. Intensive management increases soil acidification and phytotoxic Al content in Phyl-lostachys praecox stands in Southeast China. J. Sustain. For. 2018, 37, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamamoto, Y. Aluminum toxicity in plant cells: Mechanisms of cell death and inhibition of cell elongation. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2018, 65, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lu, D.; Shao, M.; Horton, R.; Liu, C. Effect of changing bulk density during water desorption measurement on soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci. 2004, 169, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dec, D.; Dörner, J.; Becker-Fazekas, O.; Horn, R. Effect of bulk density on hydraulic properties of homogenized and structured soils. Rev. Cienc. Suelo Nutr. Veg. 2008, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  26. Oyonarte, C.; Mingorance, M.D.; Durante, P.; Piñero, G.; Barahona, E. Indicators of change in the organic matter in arid soils. Sci. Total. Environ. 2007, 378, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cong, P.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, N.; Dong, J.; Pang, H.; Zhang, L.; Gao, Z. Changes in soil organic carbon and microbial community under varying straw incorporation strategies. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 204, 104735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Z.P.; Wu, X.C.; Chen, B.Y. Changes in Transformation of Soil Organic C and Functional Diversity of Soil Microbial Community Under Different Land Uses. Agric. Sci. China 2007, 6, 1235–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ji, H.; Zhuang, S.; Zhu, Z.; Zhong, Z. Soil organic carbon pool and its chemical composition in Phyllostachy pubescens forests at two altitudes in Jian-ou City, China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0146029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, P.; Wei, Y.; Wei, L.; Wu, H.; Bu, H.; Wang, G.; Wang, S. Quantitative assessments of organic matter uncoupling from clay surfaces in presence of salinity. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 188, 105532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shi, R.Y.; Ni, N.; Nkoh, J.N.; Li, J.Y.; Xu, R.K.; Qian, W. Beneficial dual role of biochars in inhibiting soil acidification resulting from nitrification. Chemosphere 2019, 234, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tong, D.; Xu, R. Effects of urea and (NH4)2SO4 on nitrification and acidification of Ultisols from Southern China. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guan, P.; Wang, R.; Nkoh, J.N.; Shi, R.; Pan, X.; Li, J.; Xu, R. Enriching organic carbon bioavailability can mitigate soil acidification induced by nitrogen fertilization in croplands through microbial N immobilization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2022, 86, 579–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cai, Z.; Xu, M.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, B.; Wen, S.; Misselbrook, T.H.; Carswell, A.M.; Duan, Y.; Gao, S. Decarboxylation of organic anions to alleviate acidification of red soils from urea application. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 3124–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental plot layout and soil sampling overview.
Figure 1. Experimental plot layout and soil sampling overview.
Agriculture 13 00536 g001
Figure 2. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil oxygen content. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil oxygen content. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 13 00536 g002
Figure 3. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil temperature. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil temperature. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 13 00536 g003
Figure 4. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil pH condition. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil pH condition. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 13 00536 g004
Figure 5. Soil water content in different treatments, depths (AC top row), and distance away from the bamboo trunk (AC, bottom row) in PD and HD directions. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Soil water content in different treatments, depths (AC top row), and distance away from the bamboo trunk (AC, bottom row) in PD and HD directions. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 13 00536 g005
Figure 6. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil organic matter content. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil organic matter content. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 13 00536 g006
Figure 7. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil total nitrogen content. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil total nitrogen content. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 13 00536 g007
Figure 8. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil total phosphorus content. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 8. Effects of soil depth (top row) and distance from plant trunk (bottom row) on soil total phosphorus content. The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Agriculture 13 00536 g008
Figure 9. Effects of different treatments on shoot height (top row), shoot diameter (middle row) and shoot weight (bottom row). The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. 1st, 2nd, and 3rd sampling indicate sampling results of the first, second and fourth week of November 2021.
Figure 9. Effects of different treatments on shoot height (top row), shoot diameter (middle row) and shoot weight (bottom row). The bars are the standard error of the replications while the different letters on the bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. 1st, 2nd, and 3rd sampling indicate sampling results of the first, second and fourth week of November 2021.
Agriculture 13 00536 g009
Table 1. The number of bamboo shoots per plot on different sampling periods.
Table 1. The number of bamboo shoots per plot on different sampling periods.
Date of SamplingSoil Treatment PlotNumber of Shoots
6 November 2021CK51
MA552
NMA236
MNA527
16 November 2021CK53
MA587
NMA316
MNA538
26 November 2021CK62
MA634
NMA365
MNA598
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mbukwa, D.; Gui, R.; Deng, S. Effect of Soil Organic Mulching Combined with Aeration Treatment on Soil Quality, Nutrients Content, and Lei Bamboo Shoot Production. Agriculture 2023, 13, 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030536

AMA Style

Mbukwa D, Gui R, Deng S. Effect of Soil Organic Mulching Combined with Aeration Treatment on Soil Quality, Nutrients Content, and Lei Bamboo Shoot Production. Agriculture. 2023; 13(3):536. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030536

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mbukwa, David, Renyi Gui, and Shixin Deng. 2023. "Effect of Soil Organic Mulching Combined with Aeration Treatment on Soil Quality, Nutrients Content, and Lei Bamboo Shoot Production" Agriculture 13, no. 3: 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030536

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop