Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Growth Conditions, Antioxidant Potential, and Sensory Attributes of Six Diverse Microgreens Species
Next Article in Special Issue
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): A Review Focused on Occurrence and Incidence in Animal Feed and Cow Milk
Previous Article in Journal
Physicochemical and Nutritional Potential of Fifteen Sorghum Cultivars from Burkina Faso
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving the Use of White Lupine in the Laying Quail Feeding by Enzymes Addition: Effects on Productive Performances, Digestion, Blood Biochemical Indices and Eggs Quality
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Impacts of Nigella sativa Inclusion during Gestation and Lactation on Ovarian Follicle Development, as Well as the Blood and Metabolic Profiles of Ardi Goats in Subtropics

Agriculture 2023, 13(3), 674; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030674
by Abd El-Nasser Mohammed * and Shaker Al-Suwaiegh
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Agriculture 2023, 13(3), 674; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030674
Submission received: 11 February 2023 / Revised: 7 March 2023 / Accepted: 12 March 2023 / Published: 14 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Nutrition and Productions: Series II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Title – The title should characterize what environment provided for the animal. Suggestion: chronic heat stress.

 

Abstract –

Announce the experimental design.

Characterize the experimental unit.

Mention the breed: Boer

Statistical test used to compare treatments.

Nigella sativa (N. sativa) supplementation –

Set a standard for concentration in the diet? % or g/kg?

The authors oscillate the use of units.

Standardize a unit system throughout text.

 

Introduction

Authors should consider in the introduction:

The effect of thermal (caloric) stress on the animal model - 1, on the physiological stage - 2, and on the main parameters used to assess metabolic responses.

 

Materials and Methods

Characterize the experimental unity.

Mention the breed: Boer

Table 1 - Standardize a unit system.

Line 88- 0.2%  -???

 

Results

Table 2 – Table 3 – Table 4 – Table 5 – Remove the standard deviation of the individual means of the variables.

Present the probability value for the F-ANOVA test for each variable.

Present a measure of variation from the general mean: Standard error of the general mean or coefficient of variation.

Figure 1 - Improve the quality.

 

Discussion

Line- 170.

--The relationship between nutrition, metabolic conditions, and reproductive functions has been investigated in several studies [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 34, 35, 36].--

This paragraph does not help the authors. It is understood that this research was another one with the same theme! The authors must highlight the differential of the research.

 

4.1. Body weight, ruminal and physiological parameters

The justification must be based essentially on the measured results. I believe that the improvement in the quality of the food is related to the efficiency of utilization, therefore, the justification for the increase in the consumption of dry matter, associated with the increase in digestibility, should be a point of reflection for the authors.

 

Conclusions

Boer goats!

Why did you mention the BOER breed only in the conclusion?

The conclusion is long-winded.

The authors must be objective, simple and direct.

Author Response

Dear reviewer

The responses on your valuable comments is included in the cover letter and in the manuscript

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Introduction

The first paragraph is too generalistic, it can be adapted to suit better the needs of the present manuscript.

A new paragraph should be added between the 2nd and 3rd to bridge better the conjectures of the authors.

Finally, the objectives must be clearly presented.

 

Procedures

Please present details of the experimental animals: breeds, age, numbers, selection procedures, health status etc.

Please detail the U/S procedures for study of the ovarian dynamics (there are various techniques available and the authors must described in detail the one performed).

 

Results

Table 2: heart rate or pulse rate? Please clarify

Please provide sequential U/S figures to provide convincing evidence about the findings of the ovarian dynamics.

 

Discussion

The work on the ovarian dynamics is not strong as it is and the results are not convincing. Also, the authors do not have a plausible hypothesis to support their potential findings.

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer

The responses to your valuable comments are included in the cover letter and in the manuscript

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Two minor points for correction in the revised manuscript.

1. Please add a passage in the discussion with the clinical significance of the findings.

2. Please update the list of references with some recently published relevant papers.

Back to TopTop