Next Article in Journal
Joint Inversion for Sound Speed Field and Moving Source Localization in Shallow Water
Previous Article in Journal
Depth Selection and In Situ Validation for Offshore Mussel Aquaculture in Northeast United States Federal Waters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on Unconstrained Compressive Strength and Microstructure of Calcareous Sand with Curing Agent

School of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7(9), 294; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7090294
Submission received: 5 August 2019 / Revised: 26 August 2019 / Accepted: 27 August 2019 / Published: 29 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Engineering)

Abstract

:
In the South China Sea, calcareous sand, as a natural foundation, has the features of low mechanical properties, including its compressive strength. With the development of South China Sea islands, the problems of calcareous sand foundation are encountered in the process. However, the experience of traditional pile foundation engineering could not be applied to calcareous sand. In this study, different proportions of curing agents were added to calcareous sand to improve the compressive strength. The quantitative analysis of the relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and microstructure of solidified calcareous sand is discussed. The unconfined compressive strength was gauged from unconfined compressive strength tests. Microscopic images, acquired using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), were processed using the Image-Pro Plus (IPP) image processing software. The microscopic parameters, obtained using IPP, include the average equivalent particle size (Dp), the average equivalent aperture size (Db), and the plane pore ratio (e). This research demonstrates that the curing agent could improve the compressive strength, which has a relation with the three microstructure parameters. The curing agent, through hydration reaction, generates hydration products, i.e., calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide, and calcite crystals. They adhere to the surface of the particles or fill the space between the particles, which helps increase the compressive strength. In addition, there is a good linear relationship between the macroscopic mechanics and the microscopic parameters. Using the mathematical relation between the macroscopic and microscopic parameters, the correlation can be built for macro-microscopic research.

1. Introduction

In the South China Sea, calcareous sand, as a geotechnical medium formed by marine organisms, is widely distributed. In the construction of the South China Sea project, calcareous sand, as a natural foundation, is characterized by low bearing capacity of foundation and small building load. However, with China’s strategic goal of "building a strong ocean power", China will enhance the construction of the South China Sea island, including wharfs, airport runways, and various civil buildings. During the construction process, it will meet the problem of calcareous sand foundation [1,2,3,4,5,6].
A large number of studies have shown that calcareous sand is a kind of rock and soil material with internal porous, an irregular shape, and is easy to break. Among them, Wang [2] discussed the physical properties of calcareous sand. Wei [4] analyzed the internal pore characteristics of calcareous sand structure. Coop [5], Xiao [6], and Donohue [7] discussed the particle breakage of calcareous sand. Therefore, the mechanical properties of calcareous sand are different from those of common sand.
In addition, the traditional foundation treatment methods include mechanical compaction, chemical grouting, replacement treatment, and so on. Lehane [8] carried out the experimental study of calcareous sand model piles, which indicated that the traditional pile foundation engineering may not be used in calcareous sand. Therefore, we need to implement measures to enhance the mechanical properties of calcareous sand foundation.
Nowadays, numerous scholars have performed a lot of research on enhancing the mechanical properties of calcareous sand. One of the methods is to use microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) technology for foundation treatment [1,3,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Ivanov [18] and Van Paassen [19] have proved that MICP could effectively improve the strength of soil. At the same time, De Jong [20] detected by SEM that MICP cement was calcite, which filled the pores between particles, enhancing the mechanical properties of soil. Xiao [21] carried out cyclic triaxial test on calcareous sand reinforced by MICP and found that microbial grouting could significantly improve the liquefaction resistance of sand columns and model foundations. Though the mechanical properties of the calcareous sand could be improved using MICP, the method is characterized by strict sampling conditions, complex operation, high sample preparation cost, and lack of good economic benefits. In the study, the curing agent was added to calcareous sand to improve the compressive strength. This method is not only simple to operate, but also can effectively improve the mechanical properties of calcareous sand. In addition, there is little quantitative research on its macroscopic and microscopic properties, and the majority of them could only determine the changing trend between the macroscopic and microscopic parameters, lacking good correlation. However, the research demonstrates the quantitative relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and microstructure of the solidified calcareous sand. Using the mathematical relationship between the macroscopic and microscopic parameters, the correlation can be built for macro-microscopic research.
In this paper, by adding the curing agent to the calcareous sand, the mechanical properties of soil are improved, including its compressive strength. The effects of curing time and curing agent contents on solidified calcareous sands are investigated. The compressive strength and microstructural parameters are obtained using compression tests and SEM. Based on these, the quantitative dependence of the macroscopic and microscopic parameters is established, not just the trend between them, so as to explain how the macroscopic parameters change as the microscopic parameters change more reasonably and intuitively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

The calcareous sand used in this study is from an island reef in the South China Sea. In order to achieve easy compaction during sample preparation and to obtain the maximum degree of compactness, it is necessary to obtain the optimum soil water content using compaction testing. The moisture content was 20%, the specimens were separated into four groups, and the curing agent contents were 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12%. The mold size for filling test soil sample was 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm × 70.7 mm. To determine the quantitative relationship between the macroscopic and microscopic properties, the curing ages for the samples were 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 28 days, 35 days, 42 days, 56 days, 72 days, 90 days, and 180 days. This is because the sample changes significantly during the early periods of curing, while it changes little in the later periods of curing. Therefore, the intervals between the early periods of curing are short, but the ones between the later periods are longer.
The compaction tests, following standard GB T50123-1999, involved placing the soil into a compaction cylinder and striking the soil with a hammer according to the prescribed drop distance for a certain number of times, during which the relationship between the moisture content and the dry density was measured. When the dry density reached the maximum value, the corresponding moisture content was the optimum water content.
Before the preparation of soil samples, the soil was cleaned and dried to remove a few large particle impurities in the undisturbed sand. The mean particle diameter d50 = 0.31 mm, the inhomogeneity coefficient Cu = 2.19, the curvature coefficient Cc = 0.91, the maximum pore ratio emax = 1.74, and the minimum pore ratio emin = 1.28.
During sample preparation, curing agent with contents of 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12% were added to the calcareous sand following standard GB 50010-2010. Then, water was added (until a water content of 20% was reached) and the soil was mixed well. In addition, the mixed soil sample was placed in a mold. The sample was tampered down with a tamping rod. After this, the entire soil sample and the mold were placed in the curing box at 20 °C and 99% humidity. The curing period was 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 28 days, 35 days, 42 days, 56 days, 72 days, 90 days, and 180 days. Finally, the sample was removed from the curing box to continue the follow-up experiment.
The curing agent used in the test is a self-made curing agent, which contains a variety of materials, including ordinary Portland cement, lime (CaO), sodium sulfonate, acrylamide, and so on. The main components of the cement are reported in Table 1.

2.2. Test Method

The entire experimental process is illustrated in Figure 1. First, curing agents (6%, 8%, 10%, and 12%) were added to the calcareous sand from an island reef in the South China Sea to prepare samples. Then, the samples were placed in the curing box. In addition, the unconfined compressive test was conducted to determine the compressive strength of a sample. Meanwhile, microscopic images were obtained using a SEM. Next, the microscopic images were processed using the IPP processing software, and the microstructural parameters were obtained. Based on the above-described macroscopic and microscopic data, the corresponding microstructure and compressive strength were respectively taken as the X-axis and the Y-axis for a certain curing period and curing agent. Then, a rectangular coordinate system was established, and a fitting curve was drawn. Finally, the quantitative relationship between the compressive strength and the microstructural parameters was discussed.
Three samples were tested for each curing age (7 d, 14 d, 21 d, 28 d, 35 d, 42 d, 56 d, 72 d, 90 d, and 180 d) and curing agent content (6%, 8%, 10%, and 12%). For a certain curing age and curing agent content, the unconfined compressive strength and microscopic parameters of the three samples were measured respectively. The average value of each parameter was taken as the final measurement result. Table 2 shows the experimental scheme for each curing age and curing agent content.
The machine used in the unconfined compression test is shown in Figure 2. The type of the machine is DYE-2000. The experimental process of the unconfined compression test following standard GB T50123-1999 is as follows.
  • The sample was taken from the curing box and was placed on the base of the machine. The handwheel was turned so that the pressure plate was slowly dropped to just contact with the sample, and the dynamometer reading was adjusted to zero.
  • The switch of the machine was turned on and the sample was pressurized until the soil was broken. The test should be completed within 8 to 10 minutes.
  • When the dynamometer reading peaked or stabilized, the data were recorded, and the test was completed.
The SEM analysis was conducted using a field emission scanning electron microscope (ER-SEM) made in Japan. The following SEM analytical procedure was used.
  • Soil samples were removed from the curing box. Then, the soil samples were removed from the mold, and cut into small 10 × 10 × 20 mm samples with a knife.
  • The samples were dehydrated for one day before the scanning electron microscopy analysis. The oven drying method was adopted to dehydrate the samples.
  • After dehydration and drying, the specimens were broken, and the SEM analysis was performed on the flat fracture surface. If the surface of a sample was not flat enough, the brightness of the SEM image deviated, and the resulting image was not clear enough.
  • Because the samples were not conductive, it was necessary to conduct the gold sputtering on the samples. When the sputtering was being treated, we were careful to control the spraying time. Spraying for too long leads to an excessively thick gold film on a sample’s surface, which may cover the undisturbed structure of the solidified calcareous sand. Spraying for too short a time results in insufficient conductivity and unclear images. In this test, the sputtering speed was 10 mm/min and the sputtering time was 60 s.
  • The sample was treated by sputtering before the scanning electron microscopy was conducted.
The microscopic images of the solidified calcareous sand were processed and analyzed using IPP. Gu et al. [22], Vito et al. [23], and Yang et al [24,25] introduced these specific practices. The processing steps are as follows.
  • Image segmentation is defined as the binarization of an image, which converts the image into a black and white image by determining a threshold. At present, there is no standard method for the binarization of microscopic images, so only a certain range of thresholds can be determined. In this study, through constant adjustment of the threshold, the binary image, which best reflects the true appearance of the solidified calcareous sand, was selected as the object of analysis.
  • Image morphology processing was conducted in order to remove the isolated highlights and black spots during image acquisition and processing, without destroying the original image structure.
  • The measuring units were calibrated. The image is in pixels, but our research requires an area size, so we need to add new rulers using the software. It can be calibrated using the scale of the SEM image.
  • The measurement parameters for the measurement were selected. The number and area of the pores and particles need to be calculated in this study.
  • The measurement data were extracted. After the measurement was completed, the measurement data were extracted and analyzed.

3. Test Results

3.1. Compression Test and SEM Results

The unconfined compressive strength values of the solidified calcareous sands for different curing periods and curing agent contents are reported in Table 3. As the curing period and curing agent content increase, the compressive strength of the solidified calcareous sand increases.
The relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the curing period is reported in Figure 3. Figure 3 illustrates that for the same curing agent content, the compressive strength of the solidified calcareous sand will increase with the increase of curing time, and the compressive strength will not increase after 90 days of the curing period.
It is due to the hydration reaction of the curing agent. The hydration reaction equation is as follows:
3 CaO · SiO 2 + 7 H 2 O   3 CaO · 2 SiO 2 · 3 H 2 O + 3 Ca ( OH ) 2 ,
2 CaO · SiO 2 + 5 H 2 O   3 CaO · 2 SiO 2 · 3 H 2 O + 3 Ca ( OH ) 2
The calcium silicate hydrate is hydrated by the hydration reaction. Its microstructure is flocculent, and it possesses strong cementation. The calcium hydroxide, which has a flaky microstructure, adheres to the particle surfaces or fills in the pores, so it plays a role in solidifying the calcareous sand.
In addition, the prismatic calcite crystal is produced by the reaction of the calcium hydroxide and the carbon dioxide. The calcite crystal, which has strong cementation, connects loose soil samples into a whole structure.
The hydration products are flocculent calcium silicate hydrate (Figure 4a), flaky calcium hydroxide (Figure 4b), and prismatic calcite crystal (Figure 4c). Based on the above analysis, by adding the curing agent to the calcareous sand, the hydration products, produced by the hydration reactions, help improve the compressive strength of the solidified calcareous sand.
The microscopic appearance of the solidified calcareous sand is shown in Figure 5. Figure 5 indicates that the curing agent added to the soil generates hydration products through the hydration reaction of the curing agent. The hydration products adhere to the surface of the particles and fill the voids between the particles. Thus, the surface of the particles becomes rougher, which contributes to the increase in compressive strength.

3.2. Image Analysis Results

The SEM images of the solidified calcareous sands were processed using IPP, and the data related to the particles and pores were extracted from the image analysis. The average equivalent particle size (Dp), the average equivalent aperture size (Db), and the plane pore ratio (e), were quantitatively analyzed. Gu [22], Vito [23], and Yang [24,25] introduced the calculation process of micro-parameters.
The average equivalent particle size Dp is the average value of the equivalent diameter of all of the particles in the analyzed area.
The calculation formula is as follows:
D p = d i / n
d i = 2 π 1 2 A i 1 2
where: d i is the diameter of the equivalent circle equal to the area of the particle unit (μm); A i is the area of the particle unit (μm2); and n is the number of particles in the analyzed area.
The average equivalent particle sizes of the solidified calcareous sand for different curing periods and curing agent contents are reported in Table 4. According to Table 4, as the curing agent content increases, the average equivalent particle size also increases.
The average equivalent aperture size Db is the average value of the equivalent diameter of all of the pores in the analyzed area.
The calculation formula is as follows:
D b = d i / N ,
d i = 2 π 1 2 A i 1 2   ,
where: d i is the diameter of the equivalent circle that is equal to the area of the pore unit (μm); A i is the area of the pore unit (μm2); and N is the number of pores in the analyzed area.
Table 5 shows the average equivalent aperture sizes of the solidified calcareous sands for different curing period and curing agent contents. As the content of curing agent increases, the average equivalent aperture size decreases.
The plane pore ratio e is the ratio of the total area of the pores to the total area of the particles in the analyzed area.
The calculation formula is as follows:
e = S b / S p ,
where: e is the plane pore ratio; S p is the particle area in the analyzed area (μm2); and S b is the pore area in the analyzed area (μm2).
The plane pore ratio of the solidified calcareous sands for different curing time and curing agent contents are reported in Table 6. As the increase in curing agent content rises, the plane pore ratio decreases.

4. Relationships Between the Unconfined Compressive Strength and the Microstructural Parameters

The compressive strength of the solidified calcareous sand for different curing periods and curing agent contents can be obtained based on the results of the unconfined compression tests. Furthermore, the microscopic images were obtained from the SEM analysis. After the images were processed using IPP and computed, the microscopic parameters of the solidified calcareous sand were obtained for different curing periods and curing agent contents. Based on the above macroscopic and microscopic data, for a certain curing period and curing agent content, the corresponding microscopic parameters and compressive strength were obtained. Then, they were used as the X–axis and Y-axis, respectively, the image coordinates were established, and the fitting curves between these parameters were drawn. Using this process, the quantitative dependence between the compressive strength and the microscopic parameters were obtained.
Based on the above methods, the microscopic parameters (x-axis) and the compressive strength (y-axis) of the solidified calcareous sand for diverse curing periods and curing agent contents are shown in Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9.
The relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent particle size is shown in Figure 6. According to Figure 6, for the same curing agent content, as the average equivalent particle size increases, the unconfined compressive strength increases linearly. Based on the analysis of the previous SEM images, due to the hydration reaction of the curing agent, hydration products, i.e., calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide, and calcite crystal, are attached to the surface of the particles, resulting in an increase in the average equivalent particle size. Therefore, the increased bonding force between the soil particles contributes to the increase in compressive strength.
Table 10 illustrates the linear dependence of the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent particle size. The compressive strength and the average equivalent particle size are linearly related for curing agent contents of 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12%. Consequently, the average equivalent particle size can be defined for a given curing agent content and curing period, and then, the compressive strength could be computed using the above linear formula.
The relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent aperture size is reported in Figure 7. Figure 7 illustrates that for the same curing agent content, as the average equivalent aperture size decreases, the unconfined compressive strength increases linearly. Combining the previous analysis of the SEM images, the hydration products fill the macropores and the small pores between the particles. Compared to the filling rate of the small pores, the filling rate of the large pores is slower because the space in the large pores is larger. Therefore, the increase of the contact area between the particles contributes to the compressive strength.
The linear relationship between the compressive strength and the average equivalent aperture size is reported in Table 11. Table 11 also shows the linear formulas describing the relationship between the compressive strength and the average equivalent aperture size for curing agent contents of 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12%. Similarly, the compressive strength of the solidified calcareous sand could be deduced using these linear relationships.
Figure 8 shows the dependence between the unconfined compressive strength and the plane pore ratio. As the plane pore ratio decreases, the unconfined compressive strength increases linearly. In other words, the microcosmic aspect is the decrease in the plane pore ratio, while the macroscopic aspect is the linear increase in the compressive strength. The reason is that the hydration products change the pore structure and the soil properties. Therefore, the compressive strength increases.
The linear relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the plane pore ratio is shown in Table 12. Table 12 also reveals that there is a linear relationship between the compressive strength and the plane pore ratio for curing agent contents of 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12%. Similarly, the compressive strength can be computed using these formulas.
In conclusion, for a larger average equivalent particle size (Dp), a smaller average equivalent aperture size (Db), and a smaller plane pore ratio (e), as the curing time increases, the unconfined compressive strength increases. These results, combined with the microscopic analysis of the previous SEM images, indicate that the increase in the compressive strength may be caused by the hydration products, i.e., calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide, and calcite crystal, which change the pore structure and soil properties.

5. Discussion

In this paper, we demonstrate that the unconfined compressive strength of the solidified calcareous sand has a good linear correlation with the three microstructural parameters. Based on this trial, we conclude that the microstructural parameters can be defined based on the curing agent content (6%, 8%, 10%, and 12%) and curing time (7 d, 14 d, 21 d, 28 d, 35 d, 42 d, 56 d, 72 d, 90 d, and 180 d). Therefore, the unconfined compressive strength can be computed using the macroscopic-microscopic relationship obtained from the experiment. In addition, the curing agent could improve the compressive strength of the calcareous sand. This is because the hydration products, i.e., calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide, and calcite crystal, which are produced by the hydration reaction, adhere to the surface of the particles or fill the space between the particles. Therefore, the change in the pore structure and the compactness of the particles helps increase the compressive strength. It also indicates that the mechanical properties of calcareous sand could be effectively improved by adding curing agent.
The study of Xiao [18] lacks quantitative analysis of the relationship between the macroscopic and microscopic parameters. Moreover, the scholar’s method to improve the calcareous sand is microbial induction method, which is complex to operate, with harsh sample preparation conditions and high cost of materials. However, our study on the use of curing agents is simple and cost-effective, and could also improve the mechanical properties of the calcareous sand.
The past studies have demonstrated that the experience of traditional pile foundation engineering could not be used in the calcareous sand. The methods of the past studies are only qualitative analysis between the macroscopic and microscopic research. In this study, we determined the numerical relationship between the macroscopic and microscopic parameters, not only the basic trend of their relationship. Thus, we can explain the relationship between the compressive strength and the microstructural parameters more reasonably and intuitively.
Though there are important discoveries revealed in this paper, there are also limitations. Firstly, the research is based on the unconfined compressive strength test, the test conditions are unconfined, but the actual project is limited. Therefore, the research provides a theoretical basis. Secondly, the amount of curing agent used in the study is only 6%, 8%, 10%, 12%, which needs to be further expanded.
Finally, one subject that remains to be explored is how to better apply the method of adding the curing agent to engineering construction, and whether the elements of the calcareous sand particle breakage will influence the study results.

6. Conclusions

In this study, the unconfined compressive strength of the solidified calcareous sand was obtained from the unconfined compressive strength test. The microscopic SEM images were analyzed using IPP. The quantitative analysis of the relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the microstructural parameters was determined. Based on our results, we have reached the following conclusions.
  • Curing agent can improve the mechanical properties of calcareous sands. The curing agent, through hydration reactions, generates the hydration products, i.e., calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide, and calcite crystals. They adhere to the surface of the particles or fill the space between the particles and help increase the bonding strength between the soil particles. Therefore, the compressive strength improves.
  • The unconfined compressive strength has a strong linear correlation with the three microstructural parameters. By establishing the quantitative relationship between the macroscopic and microscopic parameters, the microstructural parameters can be defined based on the curing agent content (6%, 8%, 10%, and 12%) and the curing period (7 d, 14 d, 21 d, 28 d, 35 d, 42 d, 56 d, 72 d, 90 d, and 180 d). Using the mathematical relation between the macroscopic and microscopic parameters, the unconfined compressive strength can be calculated, and the correlation can be built for macro-microscopic research.
The mechanical properties of the solidified calcareous sand, obtained adding the curing agent to the calcareous sand, need more sufficient experimental studies, which contribute to the application of adding the curing agent to the construction of calcareous sand foundation in the South China Sea.

Author Contributions

Data curation, S.Y.; Funding acquisition, W.L.; Investigation, S.Y.; Resources, S.Y.; Supervision, S.Y.; Writing—original draft, S.Y.; Writing—review and editing, S.Y.

Funding

Financial support for this study was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51078228) and the National Marine public welfare industry research special funds of China (201105024-5).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Park, K.; Kim, D. Analysis of homogel uniaxial compression strength on bio grouting material. Materials 2016, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, Y.; Ma, L.; Wang, M.; Lv, Y.; Dong, L.; Fan, P. Creep constitutive model incorporating deformation mechanisms for crushable calcareous sand. Arab. J. Geosci. 2018, 11, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cheng, L.; Cord-Ruwisch, R.; Shahin, M.A. Cementation of sand soil by microbially induced calcite precipitation at various degrees of saturation. Can. Geotech. J. 2013, 50, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wei, H.; Zhao, T.; He, J.; Meng, Q.; Wang, X. Evolution of particle breakage for calcareous sands during ring shear tests. Int. J. Geomech. 2018, 18, 04017153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Coop, M.R.; Sorensen, K.K.; Freitas, T.B.; Georgoutsos, G. Particle breakage during shearing of a carbonate sand. Géotechnique 2002, 23, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xiao, Y.; Liu, H.; Xiao, P.; Xiang, J. Fractal crushing of carbonate sands under impact loading. Geotech. Lett. 2016, 6, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Donohue, S.; O’Sullivan, C.; Long, M. Particle breakage during cyclic triaxial loading of a carbonate sand. Geotechnique 2009, 59, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lehane, B.M.; Schneider, J.A.; Lim, J.K.; Mortara, G. Shaft friction from instrumented displacement piles in an uncemented calcareous sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2012, 138, 1357–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chu, J.; Ivanov, V.; Naeimi, M.; Stabnikov, V.; Liu, H.L. Optimization of calcium-based bioclogging and biocementation of sand. Acta Geotech. 2014, 9, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montoya, B.M.; De Jong, J.T.; Boulanger, R.W. Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Geotechnique 2013, 63, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salahou, M.K.; Jiao, X.Y.; Guo, W.H. Discussion of “Experimental study on the hydraulic conductivity of calcareous sand in South China Sea”. Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 2018, 36, 297–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, X.Z.; Wang, X.; Jin, Z.C.; Zhu, C.Q.; Wang, R.; Meng, Q.S. Investigation of engineering characteristics of calcareous soils from fringing reef. Ocean Eng. 2017, 134, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tian, Y.H.; Cassidy, M.J.; Gaudin, C. Advancing pipe-soil interaction models in calcareous sand. Appl. Ocean Res. 2010, 32, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Whiffin, V.S.; Van Paassen, L.A.; Harkes, M.P. Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol. J. 2007, 24, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Porcino, D.; Caridi, G.; Ghionna, V.N. Undrained monotonic and cyclic simple shear behaviour of carbonate sand. Geotechnique 2008, 58, 635–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, M.N.H.; Amarakoon, G.G.N.N.; Shimazaki, S.; Kawasaki, S. Coral sand solidification test based on microbially induced carbonate precipitation using ureolytic bacteria. Mater. Trans. 2015, 56, 1725–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Feng, K.; Montoya, B.M. Influence of confinement and cementation level on the behavior of microbial-induced calcite precipitated sands under monotonic drained loading. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2016, 142, 04015057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ivanov, V.; Chu, J.; Stabnikov, V.; Li, B. Strengthening of soft marine clay using bioencapsulation. Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 2015, 33, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Van Paassen, L.A.; Ghose, R.; Van Der Linden, T.J.M.; Van Der Star, W.R.L.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2010, 136, 1721–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Jong, J.T.; Fritzges, M.B.; Nusslein, K. Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2006, 132, 1381–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiao, P.; Liu, H.L.; Xiao, Y.; Stuedlein, A.W.; Evans, T.M. Liquefaction resistance of bio-cemented calcareous sand. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2015, 107, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gu, X.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, M.; Fu, Q.; Zhang, J. High impact performance induced by a synergistic effect of heteroepitaxy and oriented layer-unoriented layer alternated structure in iPP/HDPE injection molded part. Polymer 2019, 175, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vito, S.; Sara, L.; Roberto, P.; Giuseppe, T. Hierarchical structure of iPP during injection molding process with fast mold temperature evolution. Materials 2019, 12, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, S.; Liu, W.; Liu, H. Quantitative analysis of the relationship between shear strength and fractal dimension of solidified dredger fill with different fly ash content under monotonic shear. Pol. Marit. Res. 2018, 25, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, S.; Liu, W. Application of image-pro plus in the shear strength and micro-structure of solidified soil mixed with fly ash. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The entire experimental process.
Figure 1. The entire experimental process.
Jmse 07 00294 g001
Figure 2. The machine for the unconfined compression test.
Figure 2. The machine for the unconfined compression test.
Jmse 07 00294 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the curing period.
Figure 3. Relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the curing period.
Jmse 07 00294 g003
Figure 4. Microscopic appearance of the calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide, and calcite crystal. (a) calcium silicate hydrate; (b) calcium hydroxide; (c) calcite crystal.
Figure 4. Microscopic appearance of the calcium silicate hydrate, calcium hydroxide, and calcite crystal. (a) calcium silicate hydrate; (b) calcium hydroxide; (c) calcite crystal.
Jmse 07 00294 g004
Figure 5. Microscopic appearance of the solidified calcareous sand.
Figure 5. Microscopic appearance of the solidified calcareous sand.
Jmse 07 00294 g005
Figure 6. Relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent particle size.
Figure 6. Relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent particle size.
Jmse 07 00294 g006
Figure 7. Relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent aperture size.
Figure 7. Relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent aperture size.
Jmse 07 00294 g007
Figure 8. Dependence between the unconfined compressive strength and the plane pore ratio.
Figure 8. Dependence between the unconfined compressive strength and the plane pore ratio.
Jmse 07 00294 g008
Table 1. Main Components of the Cement (%).
Table 1. Main Components of the Cement (%).
SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOK2ONa2OP2O3TiO2SO3
21.046.942.3661.271.321.020.270.120.382.31
Table 2. The experimental scheme for each curing age and curing agent content.
Table 2. The experimental scheme for each curing age and curing agent content.
Sample (70.7 × 70.7 × 70.7 mm)Unconfined Compressive StrengthAverage ValueSample (10 × 10 × 20 mm)Microscopic ParametersAverage Value
11
22
33
Table 3. The unconfined compressive strength of the solidified calcareous sand (MPa).
Table 3. The unconfined compressive strength of the solidified calcareous sand (MPa).
Curing Period T (d)Content of Curing Agent λ (%)
681012
71.5962.5743.9064.771
141.8852.7524.1205.178
212.2283.1224.6855.727
282.4273.7074.9755.967
352.5123.8895.1126.022
422.5943.9685.2016.113
562.6434.0265.2866.179
722.6614.0655.3296.217
902.6704.0795.3546.239
1802.6724.0825.3606.243
Table 4. The average equivalent particle size of the solidified calcareous sand (μm).
Table 4. The average equivalent particle size of the solidified calcareous sand (μm).
Curing Period T (d)Content of Curing Agent λ (%)
681012
72.632.863.153.44
142.712.953.233.57
212.883.063.353.66
282.943.243.493.77
353.023.323.563.82
423.093.383.643.89
563.143.423.693.94
723.173.453.763.97
903.203.473.803.99
1803.213.473.834.01
Table 5. The average equivalent aperture size of the solidified calcareous sand (μm).
Table 5. The average equivalent aperture size of the solidified calcareous sand (μm).
Curing Period T (d)Content of Curing Agent λ (%)
681012
72.112.081.931.86
142.011.991.851.79
211.921.871.711.62
281.831.791.641.57
351.771.731.581.52
421.731.681.531.48
561.691.641.491.43
721.671.611.461.41
901.651.591.441.39
1801.651.581.431.38
Table 6. The plane pore ratio of the solidified calcareous sand.
Table 6. The plane pore ratio of the solidified calcareous sand.
Curing Period T (d)Content of Curing Agent λ (%)
681012
70.4330.4260.4110.401
140.4150.4090.3950.386
210.3970.3880.3730.367
280.3790.3690.3550.347
350.3640.3540.3410.333
420.3510.3420.3320.318
560.3430.3340.3260.309
720.3390.3290.3220.305
900.3370.3260.3200.303
1800.3360.3250.3190.302
Table 7. The average equivalent particle size (x-axis) and the compressive strength (y-axis).
Table 7. The average equivalent particle size (x-axis) and the compressive strength (y-axis).
Curing Period T (d)Content of Curing Agent λ (%)
0248
7(2.63,1.596)(2.86,2.574)(3.15,3.906)(3.44,4.771)
14(2.71,1.885)(2.95,2.752)(3.23,4.12)(3.57,5.178)
21(2.88,2.228)(3.06,3.122)(3.35,4.685)(3.66,5.727)
28(2.94,2.427)(3.24,3.707)(3.49,4.975)(3.77,5.967)
35(3.02,2.512)(3.32,3.889)(3.56,5.112)(3.82,6.022)
42(3.09,2.594)(3.38,3.968)(3.64,5.201)(3.89,6.113)
56(3.14,2.643)(3.42,4.026)(3.69,5.286)(3.94,6.179)
72(3.17,2.661)(3.45,4.065)(3.76,5.329)(3.97,6.217)
90(3.2,2.67)(3.47,4.079)(3.8,5.354)(3.99,6.239)
180(3.21,2.672)(3.47,4.082)(3.83,5.36)(4.01,6.243)
Table 8. The average equivalent aperture size (x-axis) and compressive strength (y-axis).
Table 8. The average equivalent aperture size (x-axis) and compressive strength (y-axis).
Curing Period T (d)Content of Curing Agent λ (%)
0248
7(2.11, 1.596)(2.08, 2.574)(1.93, 3.906)(1.86, 4.771)
14(2.01, 1.885)(1.99, 2.752)(1.85, 4.12)(1.79, 5.178)
21(1.92, 2.228)(1.87, 3.122)(1.71, 4.685)(1.62, 5.727)
28(1.83, 2.427)(1.79, 3.707)(1.64, 4.975)(1.57, 5.967)
35(1.77, 2.512)(1.73, 3.889)(1.58,5.112)(1.52, 6.022)
42(1.73, 2.594)(1.68, 3.968)(1.53, 5.201)(1.48, 6.113)
56(1.69, 2.643)(1.64, 4.026)(1.49, 5.286)(1.43, 6.179)
72(1.67, 2.661)(1.61, 4.065)(1.46, 5.329)(1.41, 6.217)
90(1.65, 2.67)(1.59, 4.079)(1.44, 5.354)(1.39, 6.239)
180(1.65, 2.672)(1.58, 4.082)(1.43, 5.36)(1.38, 6.243)
Table 9. The plane pore ratio (x-axis) and the compressive strength (y-axis).
Table 9. The plane pore ratio (x-axis) and the compressive strength (y-axis).
Curing Period T (d)Content of Curing Agent λ (%)
0248
7(0.433, 1.596)(0.426, 2.574)(0.411,3.906)(0.401, 4.771)
14(0.415, 1.885)(0.409, 2.752)(0.395,4.12)(0.386, 5.178)
21(0.397, 2.228)(0.388, 3.122)(0.373,4.685)(0.367, 5.727)
28(0.379, 2.427)(0.369, 3.707)(0.355,4.975)(0.347, 5.967)
35(0.364, 2.512)(0.354, 3.889)(0.341,5.112)(0.333, 6.022)
42(0.351, 2.594)(0.342, 3.968)(0.332,5.201)(0.318, 6.113)
56(0.343, 2.643)(0.334, 4.026)(0.326,5.286)(0.309, 6.179)
72(0.339, 2.661)(0.329, 4.065)(0.322,5.329)(0.305, 6.217)
90(0.337, 2.67)(0.326, 4.079)(0.32,5.354)(0.303, 6.239)
180(0.336, 2.672)(0.325, 4.082)(0.319,5.36)(0.302, 6.243)
Table 10. Linear dependence of the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent particle size.
Table 10. Linear dependence of the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent particle size.
Average Equivalent Particle Size Dp (μm)
Curing Agent Content λ (%)The Linear Relationship between the Unconfined Compressive Strength and the Average Equivalent Particle Size DpR2Slope
6y = 1.7758x − 2.93670.94751.7758
8y = 2.5541x − 4.70510.98252.5541
10y = 2.1229x − 2.60340.92642.1229
12y = 2.4946x − 3.62890.92372.4946
Table 11. Linear relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent aperture size.
Table 11. Linear relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the average equivalent aperture size.
Average Equivalent Aperture Size Db (μm)
Curing Agent Content λ (%)The Linear Relationship between the Unconfined Compressive Strength and the Average Equivalent Aperture Size DbR2Slope
6y = −2.2779x + 6.49580.96482.2779
8y = −3.2848x + 9.39450.95763.2848
10y = −2.984x + 9.72510.97462.984
12y = −2.9431x + 10.4130.95732.9431
Table 12. Linear relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the plane pore ratio.
Table 12. Linear relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and the plane pore ratio.
Plane Pore Ratio e
Curing Agent Content λ (%)The Linear Relation between the Unconfined Compressive Strength and the Plane Pore Ratio eR2Slope
6y = −10.372x + 6.22010.946710.372
8y = −15.729x + 9.29210.962915.729
10y = −15.781x + 10.4470.979115.781
12y = −12.701x + 10.1580.878812.701

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, S.; Liu, W. Research on Unconstrained Compressive Strength and Microstructure of Calcareous Sand with Curing Agent. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7090294

AMA Style

Yang S, Liu W. Research on Unconstrained Compressive Strength and Microstructure of Calcareous Sand with Curing Agent. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2019; 7(9):294. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7090294

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Shuai, and Wenbai Liu. 2019. "Research on Unconstrained Compressive Strength and Microstructure of Calcareous Sand with Curing Agent" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 7, no. 9: 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7090294

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop