Next Article in Journal
Rapid Removal of Mercury from Water by Novel MOF/PP Hybrid Membrane
Next Article in Special Issue
Review of Si-Based GeSn CVD Growth and Optoelectronic Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Transformation from Self-Focusing to Self-Defocusing of Silver Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Core-Shell Dual-Gate Nanowire Charge-Trap Memory for Synaptic Operations for Neuromorphic Applications
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Operation Guide of Si-MOS Quantum Dots for Spin Qubits

Nanomaterials 2021, 11(10), 2486; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102486
by Rui-Zi Hu 1,2,†, Rong-Long Ma 1,2,†, Ming Ni 1,2, Xin Zhang 1,2, Yuan Zhou 1,2, Ke Wang 1,2, Gang Luo 1,2, Gang Cao 1,2, Zhen-Zhen Kong 3, Gui-Lei Wang 3,*, Hai-Ou Li 1,2,* and Guo-Ping Guo 1,2,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(10), 2486; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102486
Submission received: 23 August 2021 / Revised: 13 September 2021 / Accepted: 18 September 2021 / Published: 24 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silicon Nanodevices)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article by Rui-Zi Hu, Rong-Long Ma and coworkers gives a detailed guide on making and measuring single electron transistors (SETs) which is highly enlightening and well written. There are a few minor typographical errors:

  • Line 3: "long-rang" -> "long-range"
  • Figure 3 caption: "vlotage" -> "voltage"
  • Line 220: "method" -> "methods"

I have no other major reservations about the paper and would support publication of the article with the minor spelling changes as noted.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this article the authors traced a line guide for SI-MOF quantum dots for spin qubits, mainly by showing the basic properties and the commonly method for spin-to-charge conversion. I found the paper pretty complete and it would be a reference for scientific community involved in this topic. I would recommend acceptance after minor revisions:

Line 140: “the forth line decreases” or should be "increases"?

The tendency in Figure 4 are not completely explained or at least correlated with the level arms. Further discussion is needed

From Figure 5d is not clear how t off and t on are extrapolated. Maybe the author want to explain this step.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop