Next Article in Journal
Femtosecond Laser Fabrication of Wettability-Functional Surfaces: A Review of Materials, Structures, Processing, and Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Explore the Structural and Electronic Properties at the Organic/Organic Interfaces of Thiophene-Based Supramolecular Architectures
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of High-Entropy Oxide Nanopowders with Different Crystal Structures by Electrical Explosion of Wires
Previous Article in Special Issue
Theoretical Investigation of Elastic, Electronic, and Thermodynamic Properties of Half-Heusler Semiconductors ZrNiPb and ZrPdPb Under Pressure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/nano15080572
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural and Electronic Properties of Thiophene-Based Supramolecular Architectures: Influence of the Underlying Metal Surfaces

by
Lixia Kang
1,
Yao Tian
1,
Hui Lu
1,
Shunze Xia
1,
Xianfei Xu
1 and
Zechao Yang
1,2,*
1
School of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University, No. 2318, Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 311121, China
2
Institut für Experimentalphysik, Freie Universität Berlin, Arnimallee 14, 14195 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(8), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15080572
Submission received: 7 March 2025 / Revised: 30 March 2025 / Accepted: 7 April 2025 / Published: 9 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surface and Interfacial Sciences of Low-Dimensional Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dicyanovinyl (DCV)-substituted oligothiophenes consist of both electron donor and acceptor ligands, which makes them promising materials for organic electronics. Here, we studied the structural and electronic properties of methyl-substituted dicyanovinyl-quinquethiophenes (DCV5T-Me2) adsorbed on different metal surfaces, namely Au(111), Ag(111), and Cu(111), by using low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS). It is found that the assembled structures of DCV5T-Me2 and the corresponding electronic properties vary depending on the underlying substrates. On Au(111) and Ag(111), compact organic islands are formed through intermolecular hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions. The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and LUMO+1 of DCV5T-Me2 are lower in energy on Ag(111) than those on Au(111), due to the stronger molecule–surface interaction when adsorbed on Ag(111). Moreover, orbital distributions of the LUMO and LUMO+1 in dI/dV maps on Au(111) and Ag(111) are the same as the DFT-calculated orbital distributions in gas phase, which indicates physisorption. In contrast, chemisorption dominates on Cu(111), where no ordered assemblies of DCV5T-Me2 could be formed and resonances from the LUMO and LUMO+1 vanish. The present study highlights the key role of molecule–substrate interactions in determining the properties of organic nanostructures and provides valuable insights for designing next-generation organic electronics.

1. Introduction

Molecular electronics, where functional organic molecules are utilized as the elementary building blocks for electronic circuitry, are considered as a potential candidate for next-generation electronics [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Since most of the potential applications of molecular electronics involve low-dimensional organic films growing on top of metal substrates, it is crucial to understand the structural and electronic properties of functional organic molecules when contacting with different types of metal surfaces at atomic or sub-molecular levels [7,8,9]. Benefiting from its ultra-high spatial resolution, scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) is an ideal instrument for microscopically characterizing molecular assemblies on metal surfaces [9]. Lots of effort has been made over the past few decades, and tremendous progress has been achieved in this field [7,9,10]. In general, the supramolecular architectures formed on metal and their electronic properties are mainly mediated by intermolecular interactions and effects from the surfaces, like metal–ligand hybridization, charge transfer, and so on [8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The strength of interactions between molecules and metal surfaces heavily varies depending on the specific system [11,12]. Therefore, it is meaningful to understand for a specific family of functional organic molecules how the molecule–surface interactions influence the bonding nature and corresponding electronic properties by tuning the species of underlying metal substrates.
In this work, we studied in particular a derivative of oligothiophene, methyl-substituted dicyanovinyl-quinquethiophenes (DCV5T-Me2), by using low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS). DCV5T-Me2 has an internal electron acceptor–donor–acceptor architecture, where a central electron-rich quinquethiophenes (5T) backbone serves as the donor and two terminal electron-deficient dicyanovinyl (DCV) groups are acceptor (Figure 1a). The internal acceptor–donor–acceptor structure makes DCV5T-Me2 an interesting molecule for organic diodes, transistors, and solar cells [27,28,29,30,31,32]. In particular, the introduction of electron acceptor units into oligothiophenes results in reduced band gaps and outstanding photovoltaic properties. Power conversion efficiencies over 10% have been achieved in DCV5T-Me2-based heterojunction solar cells [28,29,30,32]. The efficient charge dynamics to a large extent determines the performance of organic electronics composed of DCV5T-Me2 molecules and metal substrates, which is strongly influenced by the packing structure, molecular orbital energetic alignment, and spatial distribution [27,33,34,35,36]. The structural and electronic properties of DCV5T-Me2 on the Au(111) surface have been intensively studies, where the majority of DCV5T-Me2 molecules self-assemble into organic islands and maintain to a large degree their free-molecule character due to relatively weak surface–molecule interaction [33]. On the other hand, a few DCV5T-Me2 molecules form metal–organic chains by incorporating Au adatoms from the surface, where the molecular orbital structures are strongly modified by coordination bonding [36]. However, a systematic study on the influence of metal surfaces with different reactivity on the structural and electronic properties of DCV5T-Me2 is still missing.
Single crystals of coinage metals, namely Au(111), Ag(111), and Cu(111), were chosen in our study, whose interactions with organic molecules increase, in general, in the order from gold to silver, then to copper. Here, we also observed increasing molecule–surface binding when we moved from Au(111) to Ag(111) to Cu(111). On Au(111), compact islands are formed with all DCV5T-Me2 molecules exhibiting the same contrast. DCV5T-Me2 also self-assembles into compact islands on Ag(111), while two-thirds of the molecules adopt asymmetric adsorption geometry. DCV5T-Me2 on Cu(111), on the other hand, is pinned on the surface avoiding forming compact assemblies. Accordingly, the properties of molecular orbitals are all different for DCV5T-Me2 on these three types of noble-metal surfaces. It was found that the spatial distribution of LUMO and LUMO+1 is maintained upon adsorption on Au(111) and Ag(111) surfaces by comparing the DFT calculated orbital structures in gas phase with measured dI/dV maps, indicating physisorption. However, the resonance energies of LUMO and LUMO+1 on Ag(111) are lower around 0.8 eV than those on Au(111), due to relatively stronger metal–ligand hybridization. On Cu(111), the resonance peeks of LUMO and LUMO+1 vanish, which is the result of chemisorption. Moreover, DCV5T-Me2 assemblies scatter copper surface electrons, leading to standing waves, due to very strong metal–organic interaction. Our study demonstrated that dicyanovinyl-oligothiophenes exhibit different structural and electronic properties upon adsorption on different metal substrates, which should draw our attention when building corresponding organic electronics.

2. Methods

The experiments were performed in a low-temperature STM system working at 4.2 K and under an ultra-high vacuum condition (below 2 × 10−10 mbar). The Au(111), Ag(111), and Cu(111) single crystals (from MaTecK, Jülich, Germany) were cleaned by repeated cycles of Ar+ sputtering and subsequent annealing to around 800 K. DCV5T-Me2 molecules were deposited on the metal surfaces from a home-built molecular evaporator heated to 510 K, which leads to the formation of molecular self-assemblies on the surface. The STM images were measured in the constant current mode and processed with the Nanotec WSxM software (version Beta 9.2) [37]. The dI/dV spectra and maps were acquired with a lock-in amplifier with a typical frequency of 700 Hz and a modulation amplitude of 8 mV.
DFT calculations were carried out by using the GAUSSIAN 03 W program package [38]. The 6-31G basis set and the B3LYP exchange-correlation functional were chosen [27,35,36]. All calculations including the optimization of molecular conformation and molecular orbital alignment and distribution were performed in gas phase. Theoretical studies considering the metal substrates during DFT calculations are necessary to completely understand the mechanisms governing the modification of DCV5T-Me2 properties upon adsorption on different metal surfaces.

3. Results and Discussion

The DCV5T-Me2 molecule has two dicyanovinyl (DCV) functional groups that are symmetrically linked to a central quinquethiophenes (5T) group with the central thiophene ring substituted by two methyl (Me2) groups. DFT calculations reveal that there are several types of isomers for DCV5T-Me2 in gas phase, with differently oriented thiophene rings and DCV groups. Amongst them, the slightly bent conformation, due to the attachment of methyl groups, with alternately oriented thiophene rings and proximity of cyano groups and sulfur atoms from the neighboring thiophene rings, has the lowest total energy (Figure 1a,b) [36]. The most stable conformation, with a total length of 2.75 nm, adopts C2v symmetry with all the atoms located in the same plane except the hydrogen atoms in the methyl groups. Figure 1c shows the spatial distribution of the LUMO, LUMO+1, and LUMO+2 orbitals for the most stable conformation in gas phase. The LUMO is delocalized over the entire molecule with slightly lower intensity at the DCV groups, while the LUMO+1 is mainly distributed at the two sides and the LUMO+2 is mainly localized at the central part. The calculated orbital spatial distribution in gas phase could be used to compare with the experimentally measured orbital structure to evaluate the influence of the metal surface upon adsorption [8,9].

3.1. Assembled Structures and Electronic Properties on Au(111)

When DCV5T-Me2 is deposited on Au(111) at room temperature, it predominantly forms compact islands (Figure 2a). Individual DCV5T-Me2 monomers could also be occasionally observed lying on bare gold regions. Figure 2b shows the high resolution STM image of an individual DCV5T-Me2, which adopts a bent conformation perfectly fitting with the DFT-optimized geometry in gas phase. High resolution STM of the islands revels that the molecules within the islands have the same conformation as the individual molecules (Figure 2c). Therefore, the DFT-optimized geometry could be used to construct the bonding model of islands. As shown in Figure 2d, the cyano groups of one molecule are pointing to the hydrogen and sulfur atoms of the neighboring molecules, which results in intermolecular hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions, thereby forming domains with an extension of hundreds of nano meters in two dimensions. The intermolecular hydrogen bonding between dicyanovinyl-oligothiophenes was imaged at atomic resolution by using low-temperature atomic force microscopy in our previous studies [27,33]. Moreover, the Au(111) surface reconstruction underneath the islands is not perturbed by the adsorption of DCV5T-Me2, indicating that the interaction between the gold surface and molecules is relatively weak [39]. It is worth noting that few molecules form small clusters and short chains (highlighted by black ovals in Figure 2a) accompanying the compact islands. Those structure are formed through incorporating Au adatoms by the DCV groups, which was reported in our previous study [36].
STS was utilized to investigate the electronic structure of organic islands. As a reference, we measured first the spectra on an individual DCV5T-Me2 molecule. Differential conductance spectra recorded on the center and on the DCV end-groups of a DCV5T-Me2 molecule show a clear peak at 2.0 V (Figure 3a) with similar intensity at the three locations, which is assigned to the LUMO-derived resonance. In contrast, the LUMO+1 with an onset of 2.5 V is only distributed at the two ends. The extended and local character of the LUMO and the LUMO+1, respectively, are further confirmed by the dI/dV maps acquired at 2.0 V and 2.6 V (Figure 3b). The spatial distribution of LUMO and LUMO+1 on Au(111) is in good agreement with the molecular orbital shape obtained from our DFT calculations in gas phase (Figure 1c), which demonstrates that DCV5T-Me2 molecules maintain to a large degree their free-molecule character upon adsorption on Au(111).
STS spectra in the molecular island (Figure 3c,d) show a resonance at 1.3 V distributed over the whole molecule, and a higher-lying resonance at 1.65 V, which is mainly localized at the molecular sides. This distribution is further confirmed by dI/dV mapping, as shown in Figure 3e,f. By comparing these results with the distribution of states over an individual molecule, we assign these two resonances to states derived from the LUMO and LUMO+1 of the molecule within the islands, respectively.
These results show that the LUMO and LUMO+1 are shifted down to 1.3 V and 1.65 V in the islands from 2.0 V and >2.5 V at the single molecule, respectively, on Au(111). Spectra recorded on the molecule at the edge of the island (dash curves in Figure 3d) exhibit states with similar energies with those at the molecule within the island (solid curves in Figure 3d). It indicates that the screening effect does not strongly influence the resonance alignment here. Therefore, we attribute this shift to the presence of intermolecular interactions, which is the only possible origin for the change in electronic properties. Studies have demonstrated that the LUMO and the LUMO+1 states of PTCDA molecules within different domains, where the average hydrogenbonds length varies 0.3 Å, are different in energy. The unoccupied molecular orbitals in the domain with stronger hydrogen bonds are shifted down 0.35 V overall with respect to the states in the domain with weaker bonding. Similarly, studies on BDATB, PTCDI, and BDATB/PTCDI assemblies reveal that the intermolecular hydrogen bonds may create dipoles within the bonding regime, thereby inducing a shift in the molecular resonances in energy [40,41]. Based on these studies, we propose that the downshift in the LUMO and LUMO+1 of DCV5T-Me2 within the organic islands originates from the intermolecular hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interaction [27]. Here, the value of the shift is around 0.4 V, which is two times bigger than the reported value (0.35 V). However, it is reasonable considering that, in our system, the transition is from the absence of bonding to the presence of a big amount of strong intermolecular interactions rather than from weaker bonding to stronger bonding.
We can use the quantum mechanism of “particle in a box” to explain the downshift of molecular orbital energy [42]. Strong intermolecular interactions benefit the orbital overlap between molecules. Consequently, the distribution of electrons is more delocalized over the two dimensional domain than within one single molecule. The bigger the size of the box, the lower the energy of the states. Therefore, islands possess orbitals with lower energies than a single molecule in our system.
A closer look at the spectra in Figure 3d reveals small step-like peaks around −0.3 V, which originated from the gold surface state. The surface state penetrates the organic layer and is shifted from −0.5 eV up to −0.3 eV, caused by the change in work function due to the adsorption of organic molecules. This further demonstrates the physisorption and weak molecule–surface interaction on Au(111).

3.2. Assembled Structures and Electronic Properties on Ag(111)

The properties of DCV5T-Me2 on Ag(111) are expected to be different from the features observed on the relatively inert Au(111) surface. First of all, the work function is different for these two substrates, which will simply shift the orbital alignment in energy [43,44]. Secondly, the strength of hybridization between metal surfaces and organic molecules could modify molecular geometry. Indeed, the adsorption of DCV5T-Me2 on Ag(111) shows a different result from that on Au(111). As shown in Figure 4a, large islands of DCV5T-Me2 are also formed on Ag(111), on the other hand, without accompanying metal–organic structures (like short chains on Au(111)). Moreover, the high resolution STM image in Figure 4b reveals that there are two types of molecules with different height contrast upon packing in islands. One type exhibits homogenous contrast like on Au(111), named type A. In contrary, for the other type, one side and the center of the molecule are imaged brighter than the other side, which are labeled as type B. The brighter part of the type B molecule is 10 pm higher than type A (Figure 4c). Moreover, type B molecules arise in pairs and the brighter contrast is localized at their contacting regions (model in Figure 4b). Type A molecules emerge in pairs as well, however, with a longer intermolecular distance (model Figure 4b). The intermolecular distance between type A molecules is measured as 0.43 nm, which is 0.22 nm for the type B molecules (Figure 4d). Therefore, we attribute the higher apparent height of type B molecules to the closer intermolecular distance, which probably forces molecules to point their methyl groups outwards from the surface.
Lateral manipulation further demonstrates the dense packing origin of the intra-molecular contrast [24,45,46,47]. After removing its neighbor, a type B DCV5T-Me2 molecule is transformed to the type A molecule, whose two sides adsorb with the same height (Figure 5c,f). The same change happened to the resultant single molecule after dragging it out of the island (Figure 5b,e). If we ignore the contrast of individual molecules, it is found that the basic packing pattern of islands on Ag(111) and those on Au(111) is the same (compare models in Figure 4b with Figure 2d). Hence, we propose that intermolecular hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interaction are also responsible for the formation of DCV5T-Me2 islands on Ag(111).
STS measurements were performed to inspect the electronic properties of DCV5T-Me2 on Ag(111). The single molecule is a good reference to study the evolution of electronic properties of DCV5T-Me2 upon self-assembly into islands. dI/dV spectra (Figure 6a) show that the LUMO at 1.4 V is mainly distributed at the central part of the single molecule with a lower weight at the two sides, whereas the LUMO+1 at 2.2 V is mainly localized at the two sides. This distribution is further imaged in the dI/dV maps shown in Figure 6b and fits with the DFT-calculated orbital structure of DCV5T-Me2 in gas phase (Figure 1c).
The orbital energy alignment is changed upon self-assembly on the Ag(111) surface. Figure 6c shows spectra recorded over a type A molecule within an island. Here, three resonances are observed. The state at 0.5 V is distributed over the whole molecule, while the resonance at 0.75 V is mainly located at the two sides. By comparing the type A molecule with the distribution of unoccupied molecular orbitals over the single molecule (Figure 6a), we assign these two states to the LUMO and LUMO+1. The downshift in energy with respect to the single molecule is ascribed to intermolecular interactions, the same mechanism as the case on Au(111) [40,41]. In addition, the center possesses a higher-lying state at 1.5 V. Since DFT calculations show the LUMO+2 located at the center of DCV5T-Me2 (Figure 1c), this 1.5V resonance can be assigned to the down-shifted LUMO+2 after assembly. The type B molecule exhibits the same features, which can be demonstrated through dI/dV mapping (Figure 6d). The map acquired at 0.5 V shows similar contrast with the topography due to the delocalization of the LUMO, while signals are located at the two sides and the center at maps taken at 0.75 V and 1.5 V corresponding to the LUMO+1 and LUMO+2, respectively.
Qualitatively, the behaviors of molecular islands on Ag(111) are the same as on Au(111). However, the exact values of orbital energies differ by 0.6 ± 0.2 V. The difference in quantity can be interpreted by considering the work function of surfaces. The work function of Ag(111) is lower by 0.57 V than that of Au(111) [43], which is in good agreement with the down-shifted values of orbital energies. It means that organic islands physically adsorb on both substrates without significant hybridization at the interfaces, resulting in only a rigid shift in orbital energetic alignment [40,41].

3.3. Assembled Structures and Electronic Properties of Cu(111)

The free molecular properties are not strongly modified by both the Au(111) and Ag(111) substrates. However, a copper surface is expected to induce drastic disturbance to organic materials through strong metal–ligand hybridization. First of all, it is found that the self-assembly of DCV5T-Me2 on Cu(111) strongly depends on the substrate’s temperature. At low temperature (180 K), single molecules or small clusters randomly disperse on the surface, as shown in Figure 7a. The high resolution STM image in Figure 7b shows that molecules adopt various conformations, due to the lack of thermal-activated relaxation upon adsorption. Moreover, the two sides exhibit much lower apparent height than the central part. A reasonable explanation is that the end DCV groups and the thiophene backbone strongly interact with the surface, pulling the two methyl groups in the center ring upward. Molecules assemble into chains and pores when deposited on the substrate with higher temperature (230 K), as shown in Figure 7c. In these structures, adjacent molecules connect with each other via their end cyano moieties (Figure 7d). Such a bonding conformation is highly unstable for the bare electronegative nitrogen terminations, unless a metal atom bridges them in between [23,36,48,49,50]. Therefore, we propose that Cu adatoms are incorporated for bridging the electronegative end cyano groups. Differently from pure organic islands on Ag(111), the formation of pure metal–organic motifs on Cu(111) means that the interaction between Cu adatoms and cyano groups is much stronger than the intermolecular interactions. Disordered clusters are formed when depositing molecules on a room temperature sample (300 K), as shown in Figure 7e. The high resolution STM image in Figure 7f reveals that most of the molecules are not intact. The decomposition can be attributed to bond dissociation probably catalyzed by Cu adatoms on the Cu surface [51].
Lateral manipulations were performed to obtain more insight into the adsorption and assembly behaviors of DCV5T-Me2 on Cu(111). Figure 8a–c shows a lateral manipulation sequence of a single molecule on a cold sample (180 K). One can identify that, after manipulation, two small dots stay at their original positions, while the molecular backbone (Figure 8d) is moved away by the tip. It demonstrates that the end cyano groups are pinned at the surface upon adsorption due to strong interaction with the Cu atoms underneath. The interaction is even stronger than the covalent bonds within DCV5T-Me2, thereby dissociating the molecule during lateral manipulation. In contrast, lateral manipulation on a pore consisting of three molecules shows different phenomenon. The whole structure is dragged to another position by the tip. Although conformations are changed, molecules remain intact and are still connected via their ends. This further certifies the incorporation of Cu adatoms by ligands due to thermal activation at a moderate temperature (230 K) sample. As a result, lateral coordination bonding dominates over vertical interactions, which is so robust that the metal–organic motif can be laterally manipulated as a whole without dissociation. Note that the same phenomenon happens when manipulating the chain, indicating its combination of molecules with Cu adatoms.
We performed STS measurements at DCV5T-Me2 on Cu(111) to inspect its electronic structure. In contrast to the rich spectral information obtained when adsorbed on Au(111) and Ag(111), there is no feature within the bias range from −1.3 V to +2.0 V (Figure 9a) due to the strong hybridization with Cu surface [12]. Note that the absence of resonances is ubiquitous for spectra recorded at molecules in different assemblies and different positions of the same molecule.
In general, the strong interaction between molecules and substrates enables scattering of surface electrons [8,52,53]. Figure 9b shows standing waves surrounding a single DCV5T-Me2 molecule. The oscillation period is around 15 Å, corresponding to half of the Fermi wavelength (λF) of the Cu(111) surface. Similarly, the metal–organic chains can also serve as a scattering center, as shown in Figure 9c. This behavior is absent on Au(111) and Ag(111) because of relatively weaker interactions between the surfaces and ligands.
Consequently, surface electrons will be confined within the corresponding sealed structures, for example, the metal–organic pores [8]. As shown in Figure 10a–c, electrons are localized at pores consisting of three and four molecules, respectively. Pores with different sizes have different eigenstates. dI/dV spectra were recorded at the center of pores, with sizes ranging from three to six molecules (Figure 10a,d,e), to inspect the energy shift in confined surface electrons. The first eigenstate is monotonously shifted down from −130 meV to −360 meV as the pore size increases, as shown in Figure 10f. This phenomenon can be interpreted by the quantum mechanism of a particle in a two dimensional circular box [54,55]. The eigenstate of order (m, nr + 1) of electron gas confined in a box, can be described as follows:
E = ℏ 2 2 m e R 2 a m , n r 2 + E s
where me is the electron effective mass, R is the radius of the circle, a m , n r   can be calculated from the Bessel function, and Es is the natural onset of the surface state (−450 meV for Cu(111)). Therefore, in energy, the ground state of confined electrons is gradually shifted down to the surface state from the pore with a smaller radius to that with a bigger radius, which is associated with a weaker confinement effect. The self-assembly of different sizes of sealed nanostructures on metal surfaces offers a way to fabricate tunable surface electron states.

4. Conclusions

DCV5T-Me2 exhibits different self-assembly behaviors on Au(111), Ag(111), and Cu(111) as a result of the competition of lateral interactions between molecules, and between molecules and adatoms on surfaces. Pure organic islands are self-assembled on the Au(111) and Ag(111) substrates due to strong intermolecular attractive interactions. Differently, molecule/Cu-adatom coordination dominates the structure formation when deposited on Cu(111), inducing homogenous metal–organic motifs on the surface at room temperature. Vertical interactions between molecules and surfaces vary as well. DCV5T-Me2 physically adsorbs on Au(111) and Ag(111), while chemisorption occurs on Cu(111), resulting in scattering and confinement of surface electrons. Molecular electronic properties evolve accordingly. Molecular orbital energetic alignment is rigidly shifted down on Ag(111) with respect to that on Au(111) due to lower work function. In contrast, molecular resonances vanish on Cu(111) owing to strong organic/metal hybridization. The changes in structural and electronic properties of DCV5T-Me2 assemblies on different metal substrates should draw our attention when building corresponding organic electronics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Y.; methodology, L.K.; software, L.K. and Y.T.; validation, L.K.; formal analysis, L.K.; investigation, L.K. and Z.Y.; resources, H.L.; data curation, S.X. and X.X.; writing—original draft preparation, L.K.; writing—review and editing, Z.Y.; visualization, H.L.; supervision, Z.Y.; project administration, Z.Y.; funding acquisition, Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 22372053) and the startup project from Hangzhou Normal University.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the group of Peter Bäuerle from Universität Ulm for providing the DCV5T-Me2 molecules. The DFT calculations by using the GAUSSIAN 03W program package were performed in the group of Jose I. Pascual and Katharina J. Franke during the stay of Z. Yang at FUB, which is also acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. James, R.H.; Mark, A.R. Molecular Electronics. Phys. Today 2003, 56, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  2. Xiang, D.; Wang, X.; Jia, C.; Lee, T.; Guo, X. Molecular-Scale Electronics: From Concept to Function. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 4318–4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, T.; Bandari, V.K.; Schmidt, O.G. Molecular Electronics: Creating and Bridging Molecular Junctions and Promoting Its Commercialization. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, e2209088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xin, N.; Guan, J.; Zhou, C.; Chen, X.; Gu, C.; Li, Y.; Ratner, M.A.; Nitzan, A.; Stoddart, J.F.; Guo, X. Concepts in the design and engineering of single-molecule electronic devices. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2019, 1, 211–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, J.L.; Zhong, J.Q.; Lin, J.D.; Hu, W.P.; Wu, K.; Xu, G.Q.; Wee, A.T.S.; Chen, W. Towards single molecule switches. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2998–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gupta, R.; Fereiro, J.A.; Bayat, A.; Pritam, A.; Zharnikov, M.; Mondal, P.C. Nanoscale molecular rectifiers. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2023, 7, 106–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhao, X.; Miao, X. Surface-supported metal-organic frameworks with geometric topological diversity via scanning tunneling microscopy. Iscience 2024, 27, 109392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Piquero-Zulaica, I.; Lobo-Checa, J.; El-Fattah, Z.M.A.; Ortega, J.E.; Klappenberger, F.; Auwärter, W.; Barth, J.V. Engineering quantum states and electronic landscapes through surface molecular nanoarchitectures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2022, 94, 045008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Bu, D.; Cai, J.; Chen, H.; Chen, Q.; Chen, T.; Cheng, F.; Chi, L.; Dong, W.; et al. Recent progress on surface chemistry II: Property and characterization. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2024, 36, 110100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stone, I.; Starr, R.L.; Zang, Y.; Nuckolls, C.; Steigerwald, M.L.; Lambert, T.H.; Roy, X.; Venkataraman, L. A single-molecule blueprint for synthesis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2021, 5, 695–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hao, X.; Yang, H.; Niu, M.; Wang, T.; Ji, H.; Brumboiu, I.E.; Grazioli, C.; Guarnaccio, A.; Cossaro, A.; Li, Y.; et al. From Chains to Arrays: Substrate-Mediated Self-Assembly of Diboron Molecules. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wegner, D.; Yamachika, R.; Wang, Y.; Brar, V.W.; Bartlett, B.M.; Long, J.R.; Crommie, M.F. single-molecule charge transfer and bonding at an organic/inorganic interface: Tetracyanoethylene on noble metals. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yuan, C.; Xue, N.; Zhang, Y.; Li, N.; Shen, Z.; Hou, S.; Wang, Y. Controlling Metal-Organic Structure by Tuning Molecular Size, Supported Substrate, and Type of Metal. J. Clust. Sci. 2020, 32, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Piquero-Zulaica, I.; Hu, W.; Seitsonen, A.P.; Haag, F.; Küchle, J.; Allegretti, F.; Lyu, Y.; Chen, L.; Wu, K.; El-Fattah, Z.M.A.; et al. Unconventional Band Structure via Combined Molecular Orbital and Lattice Symmetries in a Surface-Confined Metallated Graphdiyne Sheet. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2405178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, S.-W.; Zhang, R.-X.; Kang, L.-X.; Li, D.-Y.; Xie, Y.-L.; Wang, C.-X.; Liu, P.-N. Steering Metal–Organic Network Structures through Conformations and Configurations on Surfaces. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 18014–18022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Piquero-Zulaica, I.; Li, J.; El-Fattah, Z.M.A.; Solianyk, L.; Gallardo, I.; Monjas, L.; Hirsch, A.K.H.; Arnau, A.; Ortega, J.E.; Stöhr, M.; et al. Surface state tunable energy and mass renormalization from homothetic quantum dot arrays. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 23132–23138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klappenberger, F.; Kühne, D.; Krenner, W.; Silanes, I.; Arnau, A.; de Abajo, F.J.G.; Klyatskaya, S.; Ruben, M.; Barth, J.V. tunable quantum dot arrays formed from self-assembled metal-organic networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 026802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Hou, S. Electronic confining effects in Sierpiński triangle fractals. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 115451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Colazzo, L.; Mohammed, M.S.G.; Gallardo, A.; El-Fattah, Z.M.A.; Pomposo, J.A.; Jelínek, P.; de Oteyza, D.G. Controlling the stereospecific bonding motif of Au-thiolate links. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 15567–15575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yamachika, R.; Grobis, M.; Wachowiak, A.; Crommie, M.F. Controlled atomic doping of a single C60 molecule. Science 2004, 304, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, W.; Hong, Y.; Shi, X.; Minot, C.; Van Hove, M.A.; Tang, B.Z.; Lin, N. Inspecting Metal-Coordination-Induced Perturbation of Molecular Ligand Orbitals at a Submolecular Resolution. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 1, 2295–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, W.; Shi, X.; Wang, S.; Liu, J.; Van Hove, M.A.; Liu, P.N.; Zhang, R.-Q.; Lin, N. Cooperative Modulation of Electronic Structures of Aromatic Molecules Coupled to Multiple Metal Contacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 046802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Henningsen, N.; Rurali, R.; Limbach, C.; Drost, R.; Pascual, J.I.; Franke, K.J. Site-Dependent Coordination Bonding in Self-Assembled Metal-Organic Networks. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 2, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Albrecht, F.; Neu, M.; Quest, C.; Swart, I.; Repp, J. Formation and characterization of a molecule–metal–molecule bridge in real space. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9200–9203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nazin, G.V.; Qiu, X.H.; Ho, W. Visualization and spectroscopy of a metal-molecule-metal bridge. Science 2003, 302, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, W.; Shi, X.; Lin, C.; Zhang, R.Q.; Minot, C.; Van Hove, M.A.; Hong, Y.; Tang, B.Z.; Lin, N. Manipulating Localized Molecular Orbitals by Single-Atom Contacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 126801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Z.; Lotze, C.; Corso, M.; Baum, S.; Franke, K.J.; Pascual, J.I. Direct Imaging of the Induced-Fit Effect in Molecular Self-Assembly. Small 2019, 15, e1804713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fitzner, R.; Reinold, E.; Mishra, A.; Mena-Osteritz, E.; Ziehlke, H.; Körner, C.; Leo, K.; Riede, M.; Weil, M.; Tsaryova, O.; et al. Dicyanovinyl–Substituted Oligothiophenes: Structure-Property Relationships and Application in Vacuum-Processed Small Molecule Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 897–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Haid, S.; Mishra, A.; Uhrich, C.; Pfeiffer, M.; Bäuerle, P. Dicyanovinylene-Substituted Selenophene–Thiophene Co-oligomers for Small-Molecule Organic Solar Cells. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 4435–4444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mishra, A.; Uhrich, C.; Reinold, E.; Pfeiffer, M.; Bäuerle, P. Synthesis and Characterization of Acceptor-Substituted Oligothiophenes for Solar Cell Applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mishra, A.; Bäuerle, P. Small molecule organic semiconductors on the move: Promises for future solar energy technology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2020–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schrader, M.; Fitzner, R.; Hein, M.; Elschner, C.; Baumeier, B.; Leo, K.; Riede, M.; Bäuerle, P.; Andrienko, D. Comparative study of microscopic charge dynamics in crystalline acceptor-substituted oligothiophenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6052–6056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bogner, L.; Yang, Z.; Corso, M.; Fitzner, R.; Bäuerle, P.; Franke, K.J.; Pascual, J.I.; Tegeder, P. Electronic structure and excited state dynamics in a dicyanovinyl-substituted oligothiophene on Au(111). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 27118–27126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bogner, L.; Yang, Z.; Baum, S.; Corso, M.; Fitzner, R.; Bäuerle, P.; Franke, K.J.; Pascual, J.I.; Tegeder, P. Electronic States and Exciton Dynamics in Dicyanovinyl-Sexithiophene on Au(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 27268–27275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, Z.; Lotze, C.; Franke, K.J.; Pascual, J.I. Metal–Organic Superlattices Induced by Long-Range Repulsive Interactions on a Metal Surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 18494–18500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, Z.; Corso, M.; Robles, R.; Lotze, C.; Fitzner, R.; Mena-Osteritz, E.; Bäuerle, P.; Franke, K.J.; Pascual, J.I. Orbital redistribution in molecular nanostructures mediated by metal-organic bonds. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10715–10722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Horcas, I.; Fernández, R.; Gómez-Rodriguez, J.M.; Colchero, J.; Gomez-Herrero, J.; Baro, A.M. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 78, 13705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Montgomery, T.A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K.N.; Burant, J.C.; et al. Gaussian 03, Revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  39. Torrente, I.F.; Franke, K.J.; Pascual, J.I. Structure and electronic configuration of tetracyanoquinodimethane layers on a Au(111) surface. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 277, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gonzalez-Lakunza, N.; Cañas-Ventura, M.E.; Ruffieux, P.; Rieger, R.; Müllen, K.; Fasel, R.; Arnau, A. Hydrogen-Bonding Fingerprints in Electronic States of Two-Dimensional Supramolecular Assemblies. Chemphyschem 2009, 10, 2943–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kröger, J.; Jensen, H.; Berndt, R.; Rurali, R.; Lorente, N. Molecular orbital shift of perylenetetracarboxylic-dianhydride on gold. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 438, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Riss, A.; Wickenburg, S.; Gorman, P.; Tan, L.Z.; Tsai, H.-Z.; de Oteyza, D.G.; Chen, Y.-C.; Bradley, A.J.; Ugeda, M.M.; Etkin, G.; et al. Local Electronic and Chemical Structure of Oligo-acetylene Derivatives Formed Through Radical Cyclizations at a Surface. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2251–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Skriver, H.L.; Rosengaard, N.M. Surface energy and work function of elemental metals. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 7157–7168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Repp, J.; Meyer, G.; Stojković, S.M.; Gourdon, A.; Joachim, C. Molecules on insulating films: Scanning-tunneling microscopy imaging of individual molecular orbitals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 026803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Stroscio, J.A.; Eigler, D.M. Atomic and molecular manipulation with the scanning tunneling microscope. Science 1991, 254, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Manoharan, H.C.; Lutz, C.P.; Eigler, D.M. Quantum mirages formed by coherent projection of electronic structure. Nature 2000, 403, 512–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Crommie, M.F.; Lutz, C.P.; Eigler, D.M. Confinement of electrons to quantum corrals on a metal surface. Science 1993, 262, 218–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xia, S.; Xu, X.; Tian, Y.; Zhong, J.; Yang, Z. Protected electronic structures of unoccupied molecular orbitals in metal-organic contacts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 688, 162367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Walch, H.; Dienstmaier, J.; Eder, G.; Gutzler, R.; Schlögl, S.; Sirtl, T.; Das, K.; Schmittel, M.; Lackinger, M. Extended Two-Dimensional Metal–Organic Frameworks Based on Thiolate–Copper Coordination Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7909–7915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vitali, L.; Levita, G.; Ohmann, R.; Comisso, A.; De Vita, A.; Kern, K. Portrait of the potential barrier at metal–organic nanocontacts. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kyriakou, G.; Boucher, M.B.; Jewell, A.D.; Lewis, E.A.; Lawton, T.J.; Baber, A.E.; Tierney, H.L.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M.; Sykes, E.C.H. Isolated Metal Atom Geometries as a Strategy for Selective Heterogeneous Hydrogenations. Science 2012, 335, 1209–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Leo, G.; Letizia, S.; André, G.; Christian, J.; Rieder, K.-H.; Joachim, C. Scattering of surface state electrons at large organic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 056103. [Google Scholar]
  53. Crommie, M.F.; Lutz, C.P.; Eigler, D.M. Imaging standing waves in a two-dimensional electron gas. Nature 1993, 363, 524–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Seufert, K.; Auwärter, W.; de Abajo, F.J.G.; Ecija, D.; Vijayaraghavan, S.; Joshi, S.; Barth, J.V. Controlled Interaction of Surface Quantum-Well Electronic States. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 6130–6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Pennec, Y.; Auwärter, W.; Schiffrin, A.; Weber-Bargioni, A.; Riemann, A.; Barth, J.V. Supramolecular gratings for tuneable confinement of electrons on metal surfaces. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g001
Figure 1. (a) The chemical structure and DFT-optimized conformation of the isolated DCV5T-Me2 molecule. The color code is white: hydrogen; gray: carbon; blue: nitrogen; and yellow: sulfur. The green dashed lines indicate electrostatic interaction between N and S atoms. (b) The calculated charge distribution over a free DCV5T-Me2 molecule. The S atoms and N atoms are positively and negatively charged, respectively, resulting in electrostatic interactions between them. (c) The calculated orbital structures of DCV5T-Me2 with the most stable conformation.
Figure 1. (a) The chemical structure and DFT-optimized conformation of the isolated DCV5T-Me2 molecule. The color code is white: hydrogen; gray: carbon; blue: nitrogen; and yellow: sulfur. The green dashed lines indicate electrostatic interaction between N and S atoms. (b) The calculated charge distribution over a free DCV5T-Me2 molecule. The S atoms and N atoms are positively and negatively charged, respectively, resulting in electrostatic interactions between them. (c) The calculated orbital structures of DCV5T-Me2 with the most stable conformation.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g001
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g002
Figure 2. Self-assembly of DCV5T-Me2 on Au(111). (a) An overview STM image (I = 100 pA, V = 0.8 V) of DCV5T-Me2 molecules deposited on room temperature Au(111) surface. The black ovals highlight the clusters and chains. (b) High resolution STM image (I = 100 pA, V = 0.3 V) of a single DCV5T-Me2 on the surface with the chemical structure model overlaid. (c) High resolution STM image (I = 500 pA, V = 0.2 V) of the molecular island. (d) The bonding structure of the molecular island. The red dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds, while the green dashed lines indicate the electrostatic interaction between N and S atoms.
Figure 2. Self-assembly of DCV5T-Me2 on Au(111). (a) An overview STM image (I = 100 pA, V = 0.8 V) of DCV5T-Me2 molecules deposited on room temperature Au(111) surface. The black ovals highlight the clusters and chains. (b) High resolution STM image (I = 100 pA, V = 0.3 V) of a single DCV5T-Me2 on the surface with the chemical structure model overlaid. (c) High resolution STM image (I = 500 pA, V = 0.2 V) of the molecular island. (d) The bonding structure of the molecular island. The red dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds, while the green dashed lines indicate the electrostatic interaction between N and S atoms.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g002
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g003
Figure 3. The electronic properties of DCV5T-Me2 on Au(111). (a) dI/dV spectra acquired with closed feedback (set point: I = 50 pA, V = 0.5 V) at different locations on a single molecule as indicated in the inset STM image. (b) The corresponding dI/dV maps of a single molecule recorded at the indicated biases. (c) The STM image (I = 100 pA, V = 0.5 V) of a molecular island. (d) dI/dV spectra acquired with open feedback (set point: I = 110 pA, V = −2 V) at different locations on the island as indicated in (c). The surface state is shifted up around 0.2 V due to the change in work function by the attachment of the organic layer. (e,f) The corresponding dI/dV maps of a molecular island recorded at the indicated biases. In the maps, the red color represents the background, while the yellow stands for the dI/dV signal.
Figure 3. The electronic properties of DCV5T-Me2 on Au(111). (a) dI/dV spectra acquired with closed feedback (set point: I = 50 pA, V = 0.5 V) at different locations on a single molecule as indicated in the inset STM image. (b) The corresponding dI/dV maps of a single molecule recorded at the indicated biases. (c) The STM image (I = 100 pA, V = 0.5 V) of a molecular island. (d) dI/dV spectra acquired with open feedback (set point: I = 110 pA, V = −2 V) at different locations on the island as indicated in (c). The surface state is shifted up around 0.2 V due to the change in work function by the attachment of the organic layer. (e,f) The corresponding dI/dV maps of a molecular island recorded at the indicated biases. In the maps, the red color represents the background, while the yellow stands for the dI/dV signal.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g003
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g004
Figure 4. Self-assembly of DCV5T-Me2 on Ag(111). (a) Overview STM image of DCV5T-Me2 islands (I = 15 pA, V = 0.78 V). (b) High resolution STM images (I = 70 pA, V = 0.79 V) of island revealing two types of molecules with different height contrasts. (c) Line profile acquired across black line in image (b). (d) Models showing distances between neighboring molecules in images in (b). d1 = 0.43 nm, d2 = 0.22 nm.
Figure 4. Self-assembly of DCV5T-Me2 on Ag(111). (a) Overview STM image of DCV5T-Me2 islands (I = 15 pA, V = 0.78 V). (b) High resolution STM images (I = 70 pA, V = 0.79 V) of island revealing two types of molecules with different height contrasts. (c) Line profile acquired across black line in image (b). (d) Models showing distances between neighboring molecules in images in (b). d1 = 0.43 nm, d2 = 0.22 nm.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g004
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g005
Figure 5. Contrast changes by lateral manipulation. (a,d) STM images (I = 20 pA, V = 0.76 V) before and after extracting a molecule from a compact domain (set point of the lateral manipulation: I = 100 nA, V = 0.01 V). The movement trace of the tip during manipulation is indicated by the red arrow in (a). An intact single molecule is obtained after the manipulation. (b,c) Line profiles show the height of two type B molecules before the manipulation. (e,f) Line profiles show the height of the same molecules after the manipulation. The sides with arrows have bigger values in the X axis in the profiles.
Figure 5. Contrast changes by lateral manipulation. (a,d) STM images (I = 20 pA, V = 0.76 V) before and after extracting a molecule from a compact domain (set point of the lateral manipulation: I = 100 nA, V = 0.01 V). The movement trace of the tip during manipulation is indicated by the red arrow in (a). An intact single molecule is obtained after the manipulation. (b,c) Line profiles show the height of two type B molecules before the manipulation. (e,f) Line profiles show the height of the same molecules after the manipulation. The sides with arrows have bigger values in the X axis in the profiles.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g005
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g006
Figure 6. Electronic properties of DCV5T-Me2 on Ag(111). (a) dI/dV spectra acquired with closed feedback (set point: I = 8 pA, V = 2.4 V) at different locations on a single molecule as indicated in the inset STM image. (b) Constant current STM images (left upper panel: I = 20 pA, V = 0.76 V) and corresponding constant height dI/dV maps (the other three panels) recorded at the indicated biases. (c) dI/dV spectra acquired with open feedback (set point: I = 50 pA, V = 2.0 V) at different locations of the molecule in an island as the indicated inset (I = 16 pA, V = 0.8 V). Energetic positions of the resonances in the dI/dV spectra are highlighted by black dashed, vertical lines. All the spectra are offset for clarity. (d) Constant current STM image (left upper panel: I = 14 pA, V = 0.56 V) and corresponding constant height dI/dV maps (the other three panels) recorded at the indicated biases.
Figure 6. Electronic properties of DCV5T-Me2 on Ag(111). (a) dI/dV spectra acquired with closed feedback (set point: I = 8 pA, V = 2.4 V) at different locations on a single molecule as indicated in the inset STM image. (b) Constant current STM images (left upper panel: I = 20 pA, V = 0.76 V) and corresponding constant height dI/dV maps (the other three panels) recorded at the indicated biases. (c) dI/dV spectra acquired with open feedback (set point: I = 50 pA, V = 2.0 V) at different locations of the molecule in an island as the indicated inset (I = 16 pA, V = 0.8 V). Energetic positions of the resonances in the dI/dV spectra are highlighted by black dashed, vertical lines. All the spectra are offset for clarity. (d) Constant current STM image (left upper panel: I = 14 pA, V = 0.56 V) and corresponding constant height dI/dV maps (the other three panels) recorded at the indicated biases.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g006
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g007
Figure 7. Adsorption and assembly of DCV5T-Me2 on Cu(111). (a,c,e) Overview STM images (I = 23, V = 0.33 V for a; I = 12 pA, V = 0.1 V for c; I = 100 pA, V = 0.62 V for e) of deposition of DCV5T-Me2 on sample with different temperatures, 180 K, 230 K, and 300K, respectively. (b,d,f) Corresponding high resolution STM images (I = 7.7 pA, V = 0.32 V for b; I = 8.1 pA, V = 0.1 V for d; I = 210 pA, V = 0.74 V for f). Inset in b shows pore (I = 14 pA, V = 0.11 V) consisting of three molecules.
Figure 7. Adsorption and assembly of DCV5T-Me2 on Cu(111). (a,c,e) Overview STM images (I = 23, V = 0.33 V for a; I = 12 pA, V = 0.1 V for c; I = 100 pA, V = 0.62 V for e) of deposition of DCV5T-Me2 on sample with different temperatures, 180 K, 230 K, and 300K, respectively. (b,d,f) Corresponding high resolution STM images (I = 7.7 pA, V = 0.32 V for b; I = 8.1 pA, V = 0.1 V for d; I = 210 pA, V = 0.74 V for f). Inset in b shows pore (I = 14 pA, V = 0.11 V) consisting of three molecules.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g007
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g008
Figure 8. Lateral manipulation. (a–c) STM images (I = 100 pA, V = 0.1 V) of a lateral manipulation sequence of a single DCV5T-Me2 molecule on Cu(111). (d) STM image (I = 100 pA, V = 0.1 V) of the dissociated molecule after manipulation. The green circles in (c,d) highlight the DCV groups and the backbone of the molecule, respectively. (e,f) STM images (I = 14 pA, V = 0.11 V) before and after a lateral manipulation of a three-molecule pore. During lateral manipulation, the movement trace of the tip is indicated by the black arrows in the STM images.
Figure 8. Lateral manipulation. (a–c) STM images (I = 100 pA, V = 0.1 V) of a lateral manipulation sequence of a single DCV5T-Me2 molecule on Cu(111). (d) STM image (I = 100 pA, V = 0.1 V) of the dissociated molecule after manipulation. The green circles in (c,d) highlight the DCV groups and the backbone of the molecule, respectively. (e,f) STM images (I = 14 pA, V = 0.11 V) before and after a lateral manipulation of a three-molecule pore. During lateral manipulation, the movement trace of the tip is indicated by the black arrows in the STM images.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g008
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g009
Figure 9. (a) dI/dV spectra acquired with open feedback (set point: I = 20 pA, V = 2.0 V) at DCV5T-Me2 showing no feature from −1.3 V to +2.0 V. (b,c) STM images (I = 16 pA, V = 0.14 V for (a); I = 74, V = 0.1 V for (b)) of standing waves formed through scattering surface electrons by single molecule and chain, respectively.
Figure 9. (a) dI/dV spectra acquired with open feedback (set point: I = 20 pA, V = 2.0 V) at DCV5T-Me2 showing no feature from −1.3 V to +2.0 V. (b,c) STM images (I = 16 pA, V = 0.14 V for (a); I = 74, V = 0.1 V for (b)) of standing waves formed through scattering surface electrons by single molecule and chain, respectively.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g009
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g010
Figure 10. The confinement of the surface electrons in the metal–organic pores. (a) An STM image of two pores consisting of three and four molecules (I = 80 pA, V = −0.23 V). (b,c) Corresponding constant current dI/dV maps recorded at the indicated bias voltages. The dI/dV signals (yellow and red) are superimposed over the topography (cyan). (d,e) STM images of two pores consisting of five and six molecules, respectively. (f) dI/dV spectra acquired with open feedback (set point: I = 80 pA, V = 1.0 V) at the center of pores consisting of a different number of molecules, from three to six. The energetic positions of the resonances in the dI/dV spectra are highlighted by the dashed vertical lines.
Figure 10. The confinement of the surface electrons in the metal–organic pores. (a) An STM image of two pores consisting of three and four molecules (I = 80 pA, V = −0.23 V). (b,c) Corresponding constant current dI/dV maps recorded at the indicated bias voltages. The dI/dV signals (yellow and red) are superimposed over the topography (cyan). (d,e) STM images of two pores consisting of five and six molecules, respectively. (f) dI/dV spectra acquired with open feedback (set point: I = 80 pA, V = 1.0 V) at the center of pores consisting of a different number of molecules, from three to six. The energetic positions of the resonances in the dI/dV spectra are highlighted by the dashed vertical lines.
Nanomaterials 15 00572 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, L.; Tian, Y.; Lu, H.; Xia, S.; Xu, X.; Yang, Z. Structural and Electronic Properties of Thiophene-Based Supramolecular Architectures: Influence of the Underlying Metal Surfaces. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15080572

AMA Style

Kang L, Tian Y, Lu H, Xia S, Xu X, Yang Z. Structural and Electronic Properties of Thiophene-Based Supramolecular Architectures: Influence of the Underlying Metal Surfaces. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(8):572. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15080572

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Lixia, Yao Tian, Hui Lu, Shunze Xia, Xianfei Xu, and Zechao Yang. 2025. "Structural and Electronic Properties of Thiophene-Based Supramolecular Architectures: Influence of the Underlying Metal Surfaces" Nanomaterials 15, no. 8: 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15080572

APA Style

Kang, L., Tian, Y., Lu, H., Xia, S., Xu, X., & Yang, Z. (2025). Structural and Electronic Properties of Thiophene-Based Supramolecular Architectures: Influence of the Underlying Metal Surfaces. Nanomaterials, 15(8), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15080572

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop