Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Inactivating Ability of Carbon-Nanotube Coated Plasma Treatment on Bioaerosols for Indoor Air Cleaning
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Vibration Compaction Energy of Basement Material
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of GH4169 Superalloy and Si3N4 Ceramic Joints Brazed with AgCuTi/Cu foam/AgCuTi Composited Filler

Coatings 2022, 12(10), 1496; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101496
by Xiaohong Yang 1, Yang Xue 2,*, Shenggang Wang 1, Jianya Ge 1, Yuan Chen 1, Zhengzhong Zhang 1, Jinhua Tang 1 and Junjian Xiao 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Coatings 2022, 12(10), 1496; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101496
Submission received: 4 September 2022 / Revised: 3 October 2022 / Accepted: 5 October 2022 / Published: 7 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Ceramic Coatings and Engineering Technology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is relevant for the journal, but it requires significant improvements. Please see the attached pdf file with improvement points. English writing also needs a clear improvements.

I look forward to see the revised manuscript

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

  • The author's reply is attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In my oppinion the paper ”Microstructure and mechanical properties of GH4169 and Si3N4 ceramic joints brazed with AgCuTi/Cu foam/AgCuTi composited filler” the paper is suitable for publication in Coatings Journal, after some minor corrections.

The authors should add more references and an introduction regarding specific values on mechanical properties (more than 29 references). Also, on the XRD analysis, ICDD codes should be added, in order to confirm the compounds. Parameters for SEM and XRD are very poor presented.

In rest is ok.

Author Response

  • The author's reply is attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for the improvements. Please clearly insert the innovation of the work. I could not see the percentile CoV in the revised paper.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop