Next Article in Journal
Carbon Nanotube Coatings’ Role in Transparency, Mechanical Hardness, and Wetting Angle Increase
Next Article in Special Issue
Optical Properties of Reactive RF Magnetron Sputtered Polycrystalline Cu3N Thin Films Determined by UV/Visible/NIR Spectroscopic Ellipsometry: An Eco-Friendly Solar Light Absorber
Previous Article in Journal
Moisture Sorption of Wood Surfaces Modified by One-Sided Carbonization as an Alternative to Traditional Façade Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dependence of Structural and Optical Performance of Lanthanum Fluoride Antireflective Films on O Impurities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evolution of Nanocrystalline Graphite’s Physical Properties during Film Formation

by
Mariuca Gartner
1,
Mihai Anastasescu
1,
Hermine Stroescu
1,*,
Jose Maria Calderon-Moreno
1,
Silviu Preda
1,
Octavian-Gabriel Simionescu
2,3,
Andrei Avram
2 and
Octavian Buiu
2
1
Institute of Physical Chemistry “Ilie Murgulescu”, Romanian Academy, 202 Splaiul Independentei, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Research Centre for Integrated Systems Nanotechnologies and Carbon-Based Nanomaterials, National Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies, 077190 Bucharest, Romania
3
Doctoral School of Physics, University of Bucharest, 077125 Măgurele, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(9), 1274; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12091274
Submission received: 8 June 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 25 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Thin Films Technologies for Optics, Electronics, and Sensing)

Abstract

:
Nanocrystalline graphite (NCG) layers represent a good alternative to graphene for the development of various applications, using large area, complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) compatible technologies. A comprehensive analysis of the physical properties of NCG layers—grown for different time periods via plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition (PECVD)—was conducted. The correlation between measured properties (thickness, optical constants, Raman response, electrical performance, and surface morphology) and growth time was established to further develop various functional structures. All thin films show an increased grain size and improved crystalline structure, with better electrical properties, as the plasma growth time is increased. Moreover, the spectroscopic ellipsometry investigations of their thickness and optical constants, together with the surface roughness extracted from the atomic force microscopy examinations and the electrical properties resulting from Hall measurements, point out the transition from nucleation to three-dimensional growth in the PECVD process around the five-minute mark.

1. Introduction

Graphene has generated—since its discovery [1]—an enormous interest; initially limited to theoretical studies, the topic quickly transitioned to a more application-orientated field of focus after its empirical finding by Novoselov et al. A broad spectrum of applications was unveiled [2,3] since but, device integration with current production techniques and equipment was shown to be inefficient compared to other state-of-the-art materials. Therefore, manufacturing and integration constraints are the main drivers in identifying other carbon-related materials, which could be compatible with complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technologies, thus enabling more accessible and faster integration into different applications. Nanocrystalline graphite (NCG), which can be described as a collection of sp2 hybridised carbon nanodomains delimited by amorphous carbon and various other defects, can represent a feasible alternative [4,5]. NCG thin films have already shown immense versatility, bringing tremendous contributions to various applications: from FETs and sensors to protective coatings and supercapacitors [4].
Its “less ordered” nature allows NCG thin films to be synthesised through a large variety of techniques and retain the critical properties of graphene [4], thus providing them with a significant advantage in research and development and large-scale production. From the broad assortment of deposition techniques, plasma-based methods see the most frequent use, as they provide additional energy in the form of ion bombardment and allow for lower substrate temperatures during growth. Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) is one of the most used plasma-based methods to grow NCG thin films due to its great capability of fine-tuning the film’s properties through the multitude of available parameters [4,5,6]. Parameters such as discharge power, pressure, gas ratio, and substrate temperature can provide a high degree of control over the thin films’ crystallinity, electrical conductivity, and even the type of growth (i.e., planar or vertical) [4,6,7,8,9,10]. Another notable process parameter that may not seem highly impactful at first is the plasma growth time, with which the film thickness can be controlled. Although film thickness is the direct consequence of varying the exposure time to the plasma phase, other intrinsic properties also suffer significant changes (e.g., electrical conductivity [6,11]).
The simple variation of the growth time can impart significant modifications to several physical properties. Thus, it can be a valuable parameter for adjusting the film’s properties for specific applications. Moreover, it is arguably the easiest one to modify and is readily available to do so on any deposition system. Although studies that include time-dependent deposition properties have been presented in the past, they usually focus more deeply on other process parameters, and the scope of said papers is not solely aimed at the investigation of growth time dependence [6,7,11]. For example, Schmidt et al. [7] presented a comprehensive study of NCG thin films’ properties with respect to several growth parameters, including deposition time, but the paper concentrates on a larger array of parameters and analyses a growth period of only 15 min. We believe it is important to investigate the films’ properties over a larger growth period to better observe how the thin films’ properties evolve with further three-dimensional growth. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to provide a systematic study of NCG’s properties strictly with respect to the deposition time for growth periods of up to 60 min. Several NCG thin films were grown by capacitively coupled radio frequency (RF) PECVD for different periods of time, and properties such as crystallinity, surface morphology and topography, and several electrical properties were investigated through X-ray diffraction (XRD), spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), Raman spectroscopy, and Hall measurements.

2. Experimental

2.1. Samples Preparation

Prior to the NCG deposition, the 4” Si wafers were coated with a low-temperature oxide (LTO) by PECVD with the LPX-CVD equipment (SPTS, Newport, UK). The deposition occurred at a substrate temperature of 300 °C, using SiH4 and N2O as precursors. The NCG growth was accomplished using the PECVD NANOFAB 1000 (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) equipment. First, the wafers were loaded from a load-lock chamber into the PECVD reactor at 200 °C, and the substrate temperature was gradually raised (15 °C·min−1) to 900 °C in an Ar/H2 (5%) atmosphere. The wafers were kept in these conditions for 10 min, thus completing the post-deposition densification of the LTO layer. Next, the hydrogenation of the surface is carried out for 5 min in an Ar/H2 (10%) atmosphere.
The growth of the NCG thin films was completed in a CH4:H2 plasma, at the same substrate temperature of 900 °C, for various growth intervals between 1 and 60 min. After the plasma was switched off, the wafers were cooled down to 200 °C in Ar atmosphere at a rate of 9 °C·min−1. They were then transferred back into the load-lock chamber (5 × 10−2 Torr) and cooled down to room temperature (RT). The process used to obtain the thin films described here is commonly used for synthesising the bulk-NCG subclass, as designated in Ref. [4]. For better readability, the samples are herein referred to as NCGx, where x represents the plasma growth time (in minutes) to each sample subjected to (i.e., NCG1, NCG2, NCG5, NCG15, NCG30, and NCG60).

2.2. Sample Characterization

The obtained samples were characterized from structural, optical, morphological, vibrational (modes of molecules), and electrical points of view.
Structural characterization was performed by XRD. The measurements were carried out using the Rigaku Ultima IV equipment (RIGAKU, Tokyo, Japan), with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å) and a fixed power source (40 kV and 30 mA). The diffractometer was used in the grazing incident X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) mode, with an incidence angle of α = 0.5°.
Optical characterizations of the samples were performed by SE with a J. A. Woollam VASE® ellipsometer (J. A. Woollam Inc., Lincoln, NB, USA). The measurements were executed in the 280–1700 nm spectral range at three incident angles (65°, 70°, and 75°) and with a 10 nm wavelength step. Data acquisition and analysis were realised using the WVASE® software package (version 3.92, J. A. Woollam Inc., Lincoln, NB, USA).
The surface morphology of the samples was analysed by SEM in FEG Quanta 3D (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) operating at 15 kV. The average grain size was determined by the linear intercept method using ten random straight lines through the SEM micrographs and dividing the number of grain boundaries intersecting each line by the actual line length.
The morphological features of the samples were analysed by AFM with the XE-100 microscope (Park Systems, Suwon, Korea) in true non-contact mode, using flexure-guided, cross-talk eliminated scanners. All AFM measurements were performed with NCHR sharp tips (NanosensorsTM, Neuchatel, Switzerland), with less than 8 nm tip radius, ~125 μm length, ~30 μm width, spring constant of ~42 N·m−1, and ~330 kHz resonance frequency. The topographical 2D AFM images were acquired over 8 × 8 μm2 and 1 × 1 μm2 areas. The XEI Image Processing Program (v.1.8.0, Park Systems, Suwon, Korea) was used to display the results and for subsequent statistical data analysis, including calculating the root mean square (RMS) roughness.
The Raman spectra were recorded with a Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRam HR spectrometer (Horiba Jovin Yvon, Paris, France) using a 325 nm He-Cd laser, with a spot size of around 1–2 μm, as a light source. The measurements were carried out under a microscope objective of 40× magnification, and a Raman Shift range between 1000 and 3500 cm−1 was covered. The positions (wG and wD) and maximum intensities (IG and ID) of the G and D Raman bands were determined by fitting the raw spectra with Lorentzian peaks.
Electrical characterization was accomplished by Hall measurements based on the Van der Paw effect with the HMS-5000 equipment from Ecopia (Anyang, Korea). The measurements were conducted in direct mode at RT.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. X-ray Diffraction

The structural variation of the NCG thin films with respect to various growth times, investigated by GIXRD, is presented in Figure 1. The LTO-coated Si wafer was also analyzed, and its diffraction pattern is shown alongside the NCGs’ as a reference. The XRD spectra serve only for a qualitative evaluation of the NCG films due to the overlapping of the broad line of the amorphous SiOx (LTO) and that of the C (002) crystal plane of graphene. The intensity and width of diffraction lines are related to the number of layers and the variations in the interlayer distance [12]. In addition to the diffraction line around 26°, corresponding to the C (002) crystal plane, two broad and diffuse diffraction lines can be observed at around 43°. The latter two are attributed to contributions of the C (100) and C (101) planes, which are often denoted as the C (10) single reflection. The intensity of the NCG diffraction lines increases as the plasma growth time is extended from 1 to 60 min, which corresponds to a restacking/overlapping of the graphitic domains. The structural parameters, La and Lc, representing carbon crystallites’ stacking weight and lateral crystallite size, cannot be calculated from the recorded XRD data due to the above-mentioned overlapping around 26°, the low intensity, and the signal-to-noise ratio. Therefore, La was calculated solely from the intensities ratios of the Raman G and D bands, and the results are presented in Section 3.5.

3.2. Spectroscopic Ellipsometry

To determine the films’ thickness and their optical constants, the ellipsometric measurements were analysed using a four-layers model (i.e., roughness/NCG/SiOx/Si). A Cauchy equation was initially used for the approximation of the NCG layer’s thickness, while the roughness was modelled with the Effective Medium Approximation (EMA). In the next step, the thickness fit parameter was maintained fixed, and a General Oscillator layer was used to describe the optical behaviour of the NCG layers. In this approach, the best fit was obtained using a few Tauc–Lorentz oscillators. To illustrate the efficiency of our chosen model, both the raw experimental data and the calculated data for the amplitude ratio (Ψ) and phase difference (Δ) at an incidence angle of 70° are presented in Figure 2. As observed from the overlapping of the presented spectra, a very good agreement was reached between the modelled and experimental data. Furthermore, the lowest value of the Mean Square Error (MSE) obtained by the Levenberg–Marquardt regression algorithm (~6 for the thickest sample) further supports that the model used for fitting was correct. Finally, the thickness and the optical constants of each sample were extracted from the best fit of the SE measurements and are showcased in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.
We noticed that, while the film thickness varies relatively linearly with respect to deposition time for large growth periods (Figure 3a), for the first three samples (NCG1, NCG2, and NCG5), the film thickness varies based on a second-order polynomial function (Figure 3b). This change in variation reveals the transition from the nucleation stage in the NCG’s development to the actual growth and lateral expansion of the layers [5,6].
The results of the optical constants of the investigated NCG films (Figure 4) demonstrate that NCG5 exhibits the highest refractive index. This possibly indicates that the homogeneity of the graphitic thin film is attained at a deposition time of around 5 min. Further increasing the plasma exposure time leads to a higher thickness of the deposited NCG layer and, consequently, slightly lower values of the refractive index. This observation is supported by the fact that the growth rate appears to stabilise after 5 min of growth, as evidenced in the already presented thickness evaluation and other studies [6]. As graphene and graphene-derived materials can be obtained through several methods and in various nanostructures, their optical properties vary accordingly. To better showcase the variance of graphene-based materials’ optical constants, we extracted some of the optical constants presented in a few recent literature studies regarding graphene’s optical constants obtained by SE measurements. The constants mentioned above, together with those from our present work, are displayed in Table 1 for a direct comparison. From the multitude of articles published on this topic, the ones that describe synthesis by the CVD method and measurements performed on SiO2/Si substrates were mainly chosen.
For a better depiction, the refractive index of NCG5, NCG15, and NCG30 is graphically represented in Figure 5 alongside some of the results [13,16,17] listed in Table 1, over the full investigated wavelength range. The additional experimental data sets were extracted from the literature using the WebPlotDigitizer software (Version 4.5) [21]. As can be observed from Figure 5, even the optical constants’ behaviour of graphene is slightly different in the published literature. This occurs due to some independent factors, such as the preparation method, the use of other substrates for the graphene deposition, and the number of graphene layers, or could even be linked to the investigation methods.

3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The granular morphology of the NCG films is more visible from the SEM micrographs of the NCG15, NCG30, and NCG60 films (Figure 6) than those of the thinner samples. This is because the average grain size slightly increases with the deposition time, ranging from ~19 nm for NCG15 to ~21 nm for NCG60. As the grain size shows an increasing trend with deposition time and due to the low RMS roughness of the samples, the grains for the thinner films are harder to distinguish by top-view SEM micrographs. Hence, all samples’ topography was further evaluated by AFM.

3.4. Atomic Force Microscopy

The AFM images of the NCG samples and the substrate used for deposition (SiO2/Si) are displayed in Figure 7, together with their respective height histograms. The AFM topography was recorded at an 8 × 8 μm2 and an 1 × 1 μm2 scale. The images recorded at 8 × 8 μm2 were registered to check the uniformity of the NCG deposition or the existence of defects induced during NCG layer formation. After 1 min of plasma growth, a few droplets of deposited material appear on the sample’s surface, visible as rounded white spots in Figure 7a (middle). These droplets, marked by yellow arrows in Figure 7b (left), become more visible after 5 min of NCG deposition as new carbonic layers nucleate and expand laterally on the already formed NCG layers. Otherwise, no other defects, such as cracks or exfoliations, are visible in the recorded AFM images. The lower 1 × 1 μm2 scale (Figure 7c,d) offers a better view of the NCG samples’ morphology. The granular morphology of NCG1 is not much different as an aspect from the SiO2 substrate, most probably indicating the formation of just the first NCG nucleation sites. After 2 min of deposition, the sample’s morphology is less uniform, revealing the appearance of parcels with small particles and few material deposits. After 5 min of deposition, the film’s surface is still covered only with small particles, with a few large deposits of material visible on both NCG5 and NCG15 (marked by blue arrows in Figure 7d—left and middle). When extending the deposition time to 15 and 30 min, these small particles start to nucleate themselves, and the diameter of the surface particles increases. Some double-sized (or larger) surface particles (marked by green arrows in Figure 7d—right) can be observed on the surface of the thicker samples. The current AFM observations are consistent with the previously presented top-view SEM micrographs, suggesting that larger grains are formed as the films grow thicker. This complies with the PECVD synthesis of NCG films, as the upper layers nucleate and grow on an already partially sp2 bonded carbon film and are further away from the SiO2 substrate, which should allow for a better lateral expansion of the nucleation sites [6].
The RMS roughness histogram (Figure 8a) pointed out a slight increase in roughness values for the NCG films after 1 or 2 min of deposition, probably related to the formation of the nucleation sites. As pointed out before, after 5 min, the film is formed and continuous, and the appearance of some droplets of material (see Figure 7b—left) leads to an abrupt increase in roughness. Further on, the thickness of the NCG films increases and the films become more uniform, stabilising the RMS roughness around 4 nm after 60 min of deposition (Figure 8b).

3.5. Raman Spectroscopy

In order to check the crystallisation of our samples and determine if the trend of crystallite size matches the predictions from the SEM and AFM results of the PECVD process’s evolution, Raman spectroscopy was conducted. Raman analysis of sp2 bonded carbon nanostructures, such as ours, is typically conducted in the visible spectral range. Nevertheless, we thought it would be interesting to analyse the Raman response of our samples with a 325 nm He-Cd laser, as numerous investigations in the visible spectral range of this type of carbonic film have already been published [4,5,6,22]. Although the UV excitation causes dispersion of the D band and may suppress its intensity [23,24,25,26], the acquired spectra can still be utilised as a qualitative comparison of each sample’s crystallinity relative to each other. The extracted Raman parameters are listed in Table 2. The spectra show the typical features of disordered graphitic carbon at ~1430 cm−1 (D mode) and ~1600 cm−1 (G mode)—see Ref. [24] and references therein. The position of the D and G bands, ωD and ωG, shifts to lower values as the deposition time increases and the ID/IG ratio decreases from 0.59 for NCG2 to 0.36 for NCG60 (Table 2). This indicates the growth of the typical width, La, of the nanographite domains along the hexagonal plane. The lateral crystallite size values La were calculated according to Ref. [27], and they show steady growth with respect to the deposition time (from 4.5 nm for NCG2 to 7.4 nm for NCG60—see Table 2). The proportionality of this relation implies a higher crystalline order of the nanographite domains as the films are grown for a larger period of time and further reinforces the implications inferred from the SEM and AFM results.
The 2D band is present at ~2860 cm−1, and the I2D/IG ratio decreases with deposition time from ~0.104 for NCG2 to ~0.058 for NCG60 (Table 2). The relative decrease in the 2D band’s intensity is in agreement with the enhancement of crystalline order and indicates the formation of layered nanographitic domains due to the superposition of single-layer domains. Typical Raman spectra of the thinnest and thickest samples, together with the Raman spectrum of commercial single-layer graphene, are presented in Figure 9 for a better visual depiction of the NCG films’ transformation.

3.6. Hall Measurements

The increasing degree of crystallinity of the presented samples should also involve an increase in electrical conductivity. Therefore, to evaluate the electrical properties of our samples and establish a relative dependence/trend with their growth time, Hall measurements were performed. The obtained results for bulk and sheet concentrations, resistivity, conductivity, and mobility are presented in Table 3.
All investigated samples possess a “p-type” conductivity, and their electrical properties show improvement for higher deposition times. The carrier concentration (ns), electrical conductivity (σ), and mobility (µ) increase from NCG1 to NCG60, while the resistivity (ρ) decreases, from 2.2 × 10−2 Ω·cm (NCG1) to 4.3 × 10−3 Ω·cm (NCG60), showing better conduction due to the improved crystallinity. The high values of the bulk concentration (1020 cm−3) and transmittance make them suitable as transparent conducting materials for solar cell applications.
For a better depiction of the electrical properties’ trend, the sheet concentration, mobility, resistivity, and conductivity are plotted with respect to deposition time, and the respective graphical representations are showcased in Figure 10. All electrical measurements exhibit a trend consistent with the prior investigations presented in this work, indicating a superior crystallisation for the samples grown for a larger period of time.

4. Conclusions

A comprehensive study of the physical properties of PECVD NCG was conducted, including establishing the spectral dispersion of the complex dielectric function and the Raman response as a function of the incident wavelength. Firstly, a change in growth rate after 5 min of plasma growth is found from the evaluation of film thickness by SE, suggesting the transition from nucleation to film growth. This is further confirmed by analysing the optical constants of the NCG films. SEM and AFM investigations show an increase in grain size as the deposition time increases. Furthermore, the RMS surface roughness investigations show a maximum value at a deposition time of 5 min, again touching on the transition in growth at around the 5 min mark. The Raman analysis of our samples reveals a layered structure of nanographitic domains with an improved crystallinity for higher deposition times. The enhancement of crystallinity is also reflected in the electrical properties of the NCG films, which become more conductive as the deposition time is increased. Moreover, the process evolution before and after the 5 min mark is further reflected in the films’ electrical properties, as can be seen in the respective graphical representations. All investigations of the presented samples show an increase in crystallinity and improvement of electrical properties with higher deposition times. Additionally, we conclude that the transition between the nucleation of the first few NCG layers and the three-dimensional growth of the bulk-NCG film takes place around the 5 min mark in the PECVD process under these specific parameters. As was shown in this study, the physical properties of NCG thin films can vary considerably by only modifying their growth time and so, the evolution of the NCG layer’s properties as a function of deposition time is highly relevant from the perspective of application development (e.g., field emission, electrochemical sensing, photodetectors, etc.).

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, M.A., H.S., J.M.C.-M. and S.P.; Sample preparation, A.A. and O.-G.S.; Investigation, O.-G.S., A.A., O.B.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.G., O.B. and A.A.; Writing—review and editing, O.-G.S., O.B., H.S. and M.A.; Project management, O.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors from ICF Bucharest would like to acknowledge the financial support of the project PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-2073 (UEFISCDI) and of the Romanian Government that allowed for the acquisition of the research infrastructure under POS-CCE O 2.2.1 project INFRANANOCHEM—No. 19/01.03.2009. The authors from IMT—Bucharest would like to acknowledge the funding support offered by project MICRO-NANO-SIS PLUS, 2019-2022, Cod: 1916—Romanian Ministry for Digitization, Innovation, and Research; and the PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI-2017-0619 project (UEFISCDI) “Nanostructured carbonic materials for advanced industrial applications” (NANOCARBON+).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this paper; To access specific experimental data, please contact the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Gabriel Crăciun’s (IMT Bucharest) support for acquiring SEM images is greatly acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jabari, E.; Ahmed, F.; Liravi, F.; Secor, E.B.; Lin, L.; Toyserkani, E. Two-dimensional printing of graphene: A review. 2D Mater. 2019, 6, 042004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sang, M.; Shin, J.; Kim, K.; Yu, K. Electronic and thermal properties of graphene and recent advances in graphene based electronics applications. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Simionescu, O.; Popa, R.C.; Avram, A.; Dinescu, G. Thin films of nanocrystalline graphene/graphite: An overview of synthesis and applications. Plasma Process. Polym. 2020, 17, 1900246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Simionescu, O.-G.; Pachiu, C.; Ionescu, O.; Dumbrăvescu, N.; Buiu, O.; Popa, R.C.; Avram, A.; Dinescu, G. Nanocrystalline graphite thin layers for low-strain, high-sensitivity piezoresistive sensing. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2020, 59, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Simionescu, O.-G.; Anghel, E.; Tutunaru, O.; Pachiu, C.; Gavrilă, R.; Avram, A.; Buiu, O.; Dinescu, G. Correlation between the growth process and film properties of RF-PECVD grown nanocrystalline graphite/graphene. In Solar Energy Conversion in Communities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 399–410. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schmidt, M.E.; Xu, C.; Cooke, M.; Mizuta, H.; Chong, H.M.H. Metal-free plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition of large area nanocrystalline graphene. Mater. Res. Express 2014, 1, 025031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ghosh, S.; Ganesan, K.; Polaki, S.R.; Ilango, S.; Amirthapandian, S.; Dhara, S.; Kamruddin, M.; Tyagi, A.K. Flipping growth orientation of nanographitic structures by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 91922–91931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, C.-J.; Back, M.H.; Back, R.A. The thermal decomposition of methane. I. Kinetics of the primary decomposition to C2H6 + H2; rate constant for the homogeneous unimolecular dissociation of methane and its pressure dependence. Can. J. Chem. 1975, 53, 3580–3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, J.; Schmidt, M.E.; Muruganathan, M.; Chong, H.M.H.; Mizuta, H. Large-scale nanoelectromechanical switches based on directly deposited nanocrystalline graphene on insulating substrates. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 6659–6665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aldrigo, M.; Dragoman, M.; Iordanescu, S.; Avram, A.; Simionescu, O.-G.; Parvulescu, C.; El Ghannudi, H.; Montori, S.; Nicchi, L.; Xavier, S.; et al. Tunable 24-GHz antenna arrays based on nanocrystalline graphite. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 122443–122456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. da Silva, V.A.; Rezende, M.C. Effect of the morphology and structure on the microwave absorbing properties of multiwalled carbon nanotube filled epoxy resin nanocomposites. Mater. Res. 2018, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, S.; Wan, L.; Wei, L.; Talwar, D.N.; He, K.; Feng, Z. Temperature-dependent optical properties of graphene on Si and SiO2/Si substrates. Crystals 2021, 11, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Politano, G.G.; Vena, C.; Desiderio, G.; Versace, C. Variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry characterization of turbostratic CVD-grown bilayer and trilayer graphene. Optical Mater. 2020, 107, 110165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El-Sayed, M.A.; Ermolaev, G.A.; Voronin, K.V.; Romanov, R.I.; Tselikov, G.I.; Yakubovsky, D.I.; Doroshina, N.V.; Nemtsov, A.B.; Solovey, V.R.; Voronov, A.A.; et al. Optical constants of chemical vapor deposited graphene for photonic applications. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cao, Y.; Hu, E.; Xing, J.; Liu, L.; Gu, T.; Zheng, J.; Yu, K.; Wei, W. Optical constants of restored and etched reduced graphene oxide: A spectroscopic ellipsometry study. Opt. Mater. Express 2019, 9, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schöche, S.; Hong, N.; Khorasaninejad, M.; Ambrosio, A.; Orabona, E.; Maddalena, P.; Capasso, F. Optical properties of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide determined by spectroscopic ellipsometry. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 421, 778–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, W.; Cheng, G.; Liang, Y.; Tian, B.; Liang, X.; Peng, L.; Hight Walker, A.R.; Gundlach, D.J.; Nguyen, N.V. Broadband optical properties of graphene by spectroscopic ellipsometry. Carbon N. Y. 2016, 99, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Weber, J.W.; Calado, V.E.; van de Sanden, M.C.M. Optical constants of graphene measured by spectroscopic ellipsometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 091904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kravets, V.G.; Grigorenko, A.N.; Nair, R.R.; Blake, P.; Anissimova, S.; Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K. Spectroscopic ellipsometry of graphene and an exciton-shifted van Hove peak in absorption. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 155413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rohatgi, A. Web Plot Digitizer. 2021. Available online: https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer (accessed on 18 July 2022).
  22. Simionescu, O.-G.; Romanitan, C.; Albu, C.; Pachiu, C.; Vasile, E.; Djourelov, N.; Tutunaru, O.; Stoian, M.C.; Kusko, M.; Radoi, A. Properties of nitrogen-doped nano-crystalline graphite thin films and their application as electrochemical sensors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 126510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chu, P.K.; Li, L. Characterization of amorphous and nanocrystalline carbon films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2006, 96, 253–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ferrari, A.C.; Robertson, J. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 14095–14107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ferrari, A.C. Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Commun. 2007, 143, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferrari, A.C.; Basko, D.M. Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cançado, L.G.; Takai, K.; Enoki, T.; Endo, M.; Kim, Y.A.; Mizusaki, H.; Jorio, A.; Coelho, L.N.; Magalhães-Paniago, R.; Pimenta, M.A. General equation for the determination of the crystallite size La of nanographite by Raman spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 163106-1–163106-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffractograms of the low-temperature oxide (LTO) reference wafer and the nanocrystalline graphite (NCG) samples grown at different time periods. (Inset: enhancement of the dotted square, evidencing the C(10) peak at 2θ = 43°). The spectra are smoothed with the Savitzky-Golay method over an 11-point window, with a second-order polynomial, for better differentiation of the lines.
Figure 1. X-ray diffractograms of the low-temperature oxide (LTO) reference wafer and the nanocrystalline graphite (NCG) samples grown at different time periods. (Inset: enhancement of the dotted square, evidencing the C(10) peak at 2θ = 43°). The spectra are smoothed with the Savitzky-Golay method over an 11-point window, with a second-order polynomial, for better differentiation of the lines.
Coatings 12 01274 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of the measured and calculated (a) amplitude ratio and (b) phase difference spectra, at a 70° angle of incidence, of the thin NCG films grown at different time periods.
Figure 2. Comparison of the measured and calculated (a) amplitude ratio and (b) phase difference spectra, at a 70° angle of incidence, of the thin NCG films grown at different time periods.
Coatings 12 01274 g002
Figure 3. (a) Thickness evolution, with a linear fit, of the NCG films over the full range deposition time. (b) Enhancement of the dotted squared area in (a), representing the thickness evolution over the first 5 min of growth, with a second order polynomial fit.
Figure 3. (a) Thickness evolution, with a linear fit, of the NCG films over the full range deposition time. (b) Enhancement of the dotted squared area in (a), representing the thickness evolution over the first 5 min of growth, with a second order polynomial fit.
Coatings 12 01274 g003
Figure 4. The (a) refractive index and (b) extinction coefficient of the NCG samples.
Figure 4. The (a) refractive index and (b) extinction coefficient of the NCG samples.
Coatings 12 01274 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of the refractive index of graphene obtained from Refs. [13,16,17] with this work.
Figure 5. Comparison of the refractive index of graphene obtained from Refs. [13,16,17] with this work.
Coatings 12 01274 g005
Figure 6. Top-view SEM micrographs at (ac) 150 k× and (df) 600 k× magnification of the NCG films grown for (a,d) 15, (b,e) 30, and (c,f) 60 min.
Figure 6. Top-view SEM micrographs at (ac) 150 k× and (df) 600 k× magnification of the NCG films grown for (a,d) 15, (b,e) 30, and (c,f) 60 min.
Coatings 12 01274 g006aCoatings 12 01274 g006b
Figure 7. Two-dimensional AFM images of the LTO reference substrate and the NCG samples (top row of each subfigure), with the respective height histograms below each image, taken at an (a,b) 8 × 8 μm2 and (c,d) 1 × 1 μm2 scale.
Figure 7. Two-dimensional AFM images of the LTO reference substrate and the NCG samples (top row of each subfigure), with the respective height histograms below each image, taken at an (a,b) 8 × 8 μm2 and (c,d) 1 × 1 μm2 scale.
Coatings 12 01274 g007aCoatings 12 01274 g007bCoatings 12 01274 g007c
Figure 8. (a) The root mean square (RMS) roughness histogram of the NCG samples versus deposition time (evaluated from the corresponding AFM images recorded at a 8 × 8 µm2 scale. (b) AFM image of NCG60 at a 1 × 1 μm2 scale.
Figure 8. (a) The root mean square (RMS) roughness histogram of the NCG samples versus deposition time (evaluated from the corresponding AFM images recorded at a 8 × 8 µm2 scale. (b) AFM image of NCG60 at a 1 × 1 μm2 scale.
Coatings 12 01274 g008
Figure 9. Raman spectra of commercial single-layer graphene (SLG), NCG2, and NCG60 acquired with a 325 nm He-Cd laser, showcasing the (a) D and G, and (b) 2D and D + D’ Raman bands fitted with Lorentzian peaks.
Figure 9. Raman spectra of commercial single-layer graphene (SLG), NCG2, and NCG60 acquired with a 325 nm He-Cd laser, showcasing the (a) D and G, and (b) 2D and D + D’ Raman bands fitted with Lorentzian peaks.
Coatings 12 01274 g009
Figure 10. (a) Sheet concentration, (b) mobility, (c) resistivity, and conductivity of the NCG thin films as a function of deposition time.
Figure 10. (a) Sheet concentration, (b) mobility, (c) resistivity, and conductivity of the NCG thin films as a function of deposition time.
Coatings 12 01274 g010
Table 1. Recent studies of graphene and graphene-derived materials’ optical constants, refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k), obtained by spectroscopic ellipsometry analysis.
Table 1. Recent studies of graphene and graphene-derived materials’ optical constants, refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k), obtained by spectroscopic ellipsometry analysis.
Synthesis MethodSubstrateNumber of Graphene Layers or Film ThicknessMeasurement Wavelength RangeOptical Constants
(λ = 630 nm)
Ref.
CVD *SiO2/SiBilayer218–1200 nmn = 2.95
k = 1.78
[13]
CVD *Si
PET
Monolayer
Bilayer
Trilayer
0.38–6.2 eV
0.38–5.2 eV
4.00–5.2 eV
n = 1.36
k = 0.06
[14]
CVD *Glass Quartz SiO2/SiMonolayer240–1000 nmn = 2.7
k = 1.48
[15]
CVD *SiO2/Si0.334 nm250–1100 nmn = 2.16
k = 1.06
[16]
Drop castingSiO2/Sir-GO film
1500–2500 nm
193–1690 nmn = 1.86
k = 0.83
[17]
CVD *Fused silica0.335 nm0.7–9.0 eVn = 2.91
k = 1.51
[18]
ExfoliationSiO2/Si0.34 nm210–1000 nmn = 2.73
k = 1.26
[19]
ExfoliationSiO2/Si
Amorphous quartz
0.335 nm240–750 nmn = 2.8
k = 1.45
[20]
PECVDSiO2/Sibulk-NCG
thin films
3.4–167 nm
280–1700 nmNCG5:
n = 2.29, k = 0.84
NCG15:
n = 2.13, k = 0.71
NCG30:
n = 2.03, k = 0.71
This work
* The graphene samples prepared by CVD were initially grown on Copper foils and transferred onto the respective substrate.
Table 2. Raman spectra parameters: ωD, ωG, ID/IG, I2D/IG and the calculated basal plane domain size.
Table 2. Raman spectra parameters: ωD, ωG, ID/IG, I2D/IG and the calculated basal plane domain size.
SampleωD (cm−1)ωG (cm−1)ID/IGLa (nm)I2D/IG
NCG21441.71598.90.594.50.1041
NCG51437.41594.60.515.20.1020
NCG151431.41593.00.456.00.0869
NCG301430.01592.90.377.20.0729
NCG601429.21592.80.367.40.0581
Table 3. The electrical properties of the NCG thin films resulted from Hall measurement.
Table 3. The electrical properties of the NCG thin films resulted from Hall measurement.
SampleCurrent
(mA)
Bulk Conc.
nc (cm−3)
Sheet Conc.
ns (cm−2)
Resistivity
ρ (Ω·cm)
Conductivity
σ (S·cm−1)
Mobility
µ (cm2·V−1·s−1)
NCG 10.051.67 × 10201.25 × 10142.21 × 10−24.52 × 1011.69
NCG 20.14.27 × 10202.99 × 10147.28 × 10−31.37 × 1022.01
NCG 50.52.47 × 10203.70 × 10146.02 × 10−31.66 × 1024.20
NCG 1511.88 × 10207.52 × 10145.17 × 10−31.93 × 1026.42
NCG 3031.84 × 10201.57 × 10154.99 × 10−32.00 × 1026.78
NCG 6051.97 × 10203.36 × 10154.33 × 10−32.31 × 1027.30
---
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gartner, M.; Anastasescu, M.; Stroescu, H.; Calderon-Moreno, J.M.; Preda, S.; Simionescu, O.-G.; Avram, A.; Buiu, O. Evolution of Nanocrystalline Graphite’s Physical Properties during Film Formation. Coatings 2022, 12, 1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12091274

AMA Style

Gartner M, Anastasescu M, Stroescu H, Calderon-Moreno JM, Preda S, Simionescu O-G, Avram A, Buiu O. Evolution of Nanocrystalline Graphite’s Physical Properties during Film Formation. Coatings. 2022; 12(9):1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12091274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gartner, Mariuca, Mihai Anastasescu, Hermine Stroescu, Jose Maria Calderon-Moreno, Silviu Preda, Octavian-Gabriel Simionescu, Andrei Avram, and Octavian Buiu. 2022. "Evolution of Nanocrystalline Graphite’s Physical Properties during Film Formation" Coatings 12, no. 9: 1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12091274

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop