Next Article in Journal
Effect of Displacement Degree of Distal Chevron Osteotomy on Metatarsal Stress: A Finite Element Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of the JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN Gene Family Reveals the Canonical JA-Signaling Pathway in Pineapple
Previous Article in Journal
The COVID-19 Infection Diffusion in the US and Japan: A Graph-Theoretical Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Melatonin and KNO3 Application Improves Growth, Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Maize Seedlings under Waterlogging Stress Conditions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of the Saline–Alkaline Tolerance of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Mutants Induced by Heavy-Ion Beam Mutagenesis

Biology 2022, 11(1), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010126
by Xin Zhang 1,2, Fu Yang 1, Hongyuan Ma 1 and Jingpeng Li 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Biology 2022, 11(1), 126; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010126
Submission received: 6 December 2021 / Revised: 5 January 2022 / Accepted: 11 January 2022 / Published: 13 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eco-Physiological and Molecular Basis of Stress Tolerance in Plants)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The results are interesting. However, how this method does affect the nutritional and flavor properties? I think, this is also interesting and very important.

What other traits important to the mode of cultivation are affected by this method? Is the pollen of the flowers altered? Will the mutation affect other rice varieties grown adjacent to it?

Conclusions: The answer to the questions posed in the research hypothesis was not provided. Please complete. Please also provide specific research applications.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors present a cogent study on saline and alkaline tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mutants induced by heavy-ion beam mutagenesis. The work is carried and presented in a professional way with attention to detail. There are a few small concerns before this paper is ready to publish.

I would expect supporting information with sequences etc to be provided.

The abstract needs to be shortened, it needs to be presented as a succinct summary, so the reader knows if they want to read the paper or not. The abstract is abit repetitive in the current form and needs to be shortened by 40-50%, with key points highlighted.

Small formatting issues eg line 138/139

Table 2 – ‘100.0’ can be written as ‘100’ and in the text eg line 184 '99.51' should be written as '99.5' - these levels of accuracy are not needed or proved at the current time.

The foot note on table 3 needs further explanation - the 'ab' etc after their letters is abit confusing. This is the same for table 4 and 5, these tables need to be cleaned up and formatted correctly. It is good data presented in a messy way and it detracts from the quality work.

A through English check would be useful.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for this well-written manuscript.  -  Throughout your manuscript, you are pointing out that heavy ion beam radiation is a convenient method to create stress tolerant mutants. Well, you know that it is not the only method. Therefore, I suggest adding a bit more information on alternatives. This would help stakeholders taking a decision.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop