Next Article in Journal
Roles of Toll-like Receptor Signaling in Inflammatory Bone Resorption
Previous Article in Journal
State of the Art in Sub-Phenotyping Midbrain Dopamine Neurons
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evidence for Selection on Mitochondrial OXPHOS Genes in the Mediterranean Killifish Aphanius fasciatus Valenciennes, 1821
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Cellular Response to Mercury in Non-Farmed Fish Species Based on Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Variation Analysis

1
Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Section of Animal Biology “M. La Greca”, University of Catania, Via Androne 81, 95124 Catania, Italy
2
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Anthropic Impacts and Sustainability in Marine Environment (CNR-IAS), Via De Marini 16, 16149 Genova, Italy
3
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Anthropic Impacts and Sustainability in Marine Environment (CNR-IAS), Lungomare Cristoforo Colombo 452, 90149 Palermo, Italy
4
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Anthropic Impacts and Sustainability in Marine Environment (CNR-IAS), Via del Mare, 91021 Campobello di Mazara, Italy
5
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR-CNR), Tesa 104—Arsenale, Castello 2737/F, 30122 Venezia, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(9), 691; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090691
Submission received: 24 July 2024 / Revised: 27 August 2024 / Accepted: 31 August 2024 / Published: 3 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mitochondria: The Signaling Organelle)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Mercury represent a serious threat for marine ecosystems due to its persistence in the environment. Fishes are the most numerous and widely distributed group of vertebrates, living in the sea with different species often studied and used as bioindicators of the quality of aquatic systems being able to reflect even small changes in environmental parameters. Mitochondria are small cell organelles with their own DNA and the number of mitochondria within a cell is highly variable in different animal tissues, depending on metabolic requirements. Mitochondrial genome is vulnerable to reactive oxygen species (ROS) which in turn impair mitochondrial function. Therefore, the aim of the present study was the validation of the variation in the number of mitochondrial DNA copies (mtDNAcn) as biomarker of oxidative stress in aquatic environment. Three selected fish species were collected in Augusta Bay, a contaminated area remarkable by past Hg inputs, and in a control area (Marzamemi and Portopalo di Capo Passero), both in the South-East of Sicily. Based on the evidence found, the assessment of mtDNAcn variation emerges as a valid biomarker of oxidative stress deriving from contaminant exposure.

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) pro-oxidant role on biological systems and its biogeochemical cycle represent a serious threat due to its persistence in marine environment. As the mitochondrial genome is exposed to reactive oxygen species (ROS), the aim of the present study is the validation of the variation in the number of mitochondrial DNA copies (mtDNAcn) as biomarker of oxidative stress in aquatic environment. During summer 2021, three selected fish species (Mullus barbatus, Diplodus annularis and Pagellus erythrinus) were collected in Augusta Bay, one of the most Mediterranean contaminated areas remarkable by past Hg inputs, and in a control area, both in the south-east of Sicily. The relative mtDNAcn was evaluated by qPCR on specimens of each species from both sites, characterized respectively by higher and lower Hg bioaccumulation. M. barbatus and P. erythrinus collected in Augusta showed a dramatic mtDNAcn reduction compared to their control groups while D. annularis showed an incredible mtDNAcn rising suggesting a higher resilience of this species. These results align with the mitochondrial dynamics of fission and fusion triggered by environmental toxicants. In conclusion, we suggest the implementation of the mtDNAcn variation as a valid tool for the early warning stress-related impacts in aquatic system.

1. Introduction

The Mediterranean Sea is subjected to the continuous input of numerous anthropogenic chemical compounds that pose serious threats to the balance of the entire marine ecosystem. Many studies, especially in recent decades, have focused on better understanding the toxicity of these compounds. Some contaminants, in fact, have bioaccumulation capacity in different animal tissues and this represents a hazard factor with consequences observable even long after the period of actual exposure. Contaminants can be also transferred through trophic chain through the “biomagnification” phenomenon [1]. Furthermore, it should be taken into account that many organic and/or inorganic compounds can induce severe impacts on living systems even at sub-lethal concentrations [2,3].
Osteichthyes, or bony fish, are the most numerous and widely distributed group of organisms within marine ecosystems, occupying all available ecological niches in such environments. Therefore, different species have often been studied and used as bioindicators of the quality of aquatic systems being able to reflect even small changes in environmental parameters [4]. In particular, fish are the group most exposed to the uptake of Hg through gills, skin and gut [5].
The detection of environmental contaminants relying on sensitive analytical methods, does not provide evidence on their actual or potential impact on exposed organisms. Therefore, the scientific community is focusing on the definition of biomarkers as possible primary responses of organisms at the cellular, molecular and biochemical level which are indicative of a physiological dysfunction [6] caused by a disease, a stress condition, or exposure to environmental contaminants. Thus, biomarkers are a predictive tool of the impact that environmental contaminants might have at the organism level and subsequently at the population, community and ecosystem level. In this context, a possible source of early molecular biomarker could be the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA), which has a particular vulnerability to oxidative stress induced by Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) because it lacks histones and nucleotide excision repair mechanisms unlike to nuclear DNA (nDNA). However, mitochondria are the main site of ROS generation both endogenously, from cellular respiration, and exogenously, from pro-oxidant substances (such as heavy metals). For these reasons, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is more prone to possible mutations which can in turn lead to the synthesis of functionally impaired respiratory chain subunits and respiratory chain dysfunction causing a further increase in ROS production [7]. Therefore, dysfunctional mtDNA could indicate potential exposure to xenobiotic.
The number of mitochondria within a cell is highly variable in different animal tissues, depending, for example, on energy requirements [8], vulnerability to oxidative stress [9], activation of pathways that determine mitochondrial fission and fusion events which regulate fundamental processes such as cell migration and division, embryogenesis, and are responsible of the onset of a variety of diseases [10]. An indirect estimate of the number of mitochondria in each cell is the mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn) which is closely related to the well-being of mitochondria [11].
In this context, many studies have shown how the variation of mtDNAcn can be used as an efficient predictive biomarker for the onset of cellular dysfunction and a variety of pathological conditions such as diabetes, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases in humans [12,13,14,15,16]. In particular, several studies show a positive correlation between mtDNAcn variation and carcinogenesis or occupational diseases [17]. On the other hand, because damaged mtDNA can be removed by autophagy [18], oxidative damage to the mitochondrial genome could also manifest itself through a significant decrease in mitochondrial mass and, consequently, in the copy number of the genome itself, with inevitable bioenergetic and cellular dysfunction [19,20].
Therefore, mtDNAcn variation could be a promising biomarker also for defining the impact of xenobiotics and environmental insults of various nature on animal systems although, to date, there are few studies on the topic, both with application on model [21,22,23] and non-model [24] organisms.
Based on these evidences, in the present study the mtDNAcn variation will be taken into consideration to better understand how environmental contamination affects the mitochondrial function in three fish: red mullet, Mullus barbatus (Linnaeus, 1758), annular seabream, Diplodus annularis (Linnaeus, 1758) and common pandora, Pagellus erythrinus (Linnaeus, 1758) commonly used in the biomonitoring of the marine environment to study the effects of various pollutants such as metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalates and microplastics [25,26,27,28].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Area of Study

The sampling areas were chosen in order to have specimens of the three target species (M. barbatus, D. annularis and P. erythrinus) both from the area with a higher level of pollution detected in the Augusta bay (declared Site of National Interest SNI) and from a control site (Portopalo di Capo Passero for M. barbatus, Marzamemi for D. annularis and P. erythrinus). Since the 1970s, Augusta Bay has gained recognition on a global scale as a polluted marine environment [29]. Beginning in the 1950s, industrial activity quickly expanded until the 1980s: in particular, a chlor-alkali plant based on Hg-cell technology was deemed to pose a serious environmental risk to the marine environment because it released Hg into the water until environmental regulations were adopted in Italy [30]. Therefore, mercury contamination represents the main issue for this area, considering that heavy metals can bioaccumulate in tissues of aquatic organisms and, by domino effects, be transported to humans through the food chain [31,32,33].
Two sites, Portopalo di Capo Passero and Marzamemi, both further south, were chosen as control sites. Indeed, according to the report on the biological and physico-chemical quality of marine coastal waters published in 2018 by the Regional Agency for Environmental Protection of Sicily [34], these sites were found to have good water and sediment quality. The sampling sites, which will be referred to hereafter as SNI (Augusta bay) and CTR (control sites), are shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Sampling

Fish sampling was carried out along the south-eastern Sicilian coast between July and early September 2021 through experimental fishing and the support of professional local fishermen.
The biota was collected in the southern section of Augusta Bay (collection stations F1, F2; Figure 1) since it shows higher levels of Hg both in the sediments and in the water column [35] and in the petrochemical district of Priolo (collection station F3; Figure 1) that is well-known to higher levels of Hg in sediments, too [37]. Two southern control areas were defined in front of Marzamemi (collection stations F4–F7; Figure 1) and off the south-east of Portopalo di Capo Passero (collection station F8; Figure 1) both declared in “good ecological and chemical quality status” [34].
In the SNI and off Marzamemi, the sampling was carried out using trammel net with length of 400–500 m (2–3 km in Marzamemi), height of 1.80 m and mesh size 25 of mm on sandy and gravelly bottoms with bathymetry between 10 and 18 m (10–50 m in Marzamemi). Both in the study and in the control area, fishing gears were lowered during the night, stationed for a few hours and retrieved at sunrise. Instead, the sampling of control specimens of M. barbatus took place about 12 miles south-east off Portopalo di Capo Passero through a trawl net set on a muddy seabed with bathymetry of 90–100 m. The net had a total length of 78 m, length of the codend of 8 m, vertical and horizontal opening of the mouth of 50 and 70 m respectively; initial mesh of the body of the net 80 mm; diagonal type codend mesh with a diameter of 50 mm. Once the presence of a shoal was detected with the aid of an echo-sounder, the net was lowered, towed for approximately 2 miles with a course 180° to the south at a speed of 3 mph, and then hoisted on board.
After collection, all fish specimens were immediately sacrificed by an overdose of MS222 (100 mg/L, Sandoz), according to [38], then were stored with flake ice and landed as quickly as possible. Once in laboratory morphological recognition of fishes was carried out following the analytical keys reported by [39], biometric parameters (total length, standard length and weight) were measured and a 1-cm fragment of muscular caudal fin was taken from each specimen, with sterile instruments in order to avoid contamination, and then stored in 96% ethanol before further processing.
The number of specimens of the three selected species (M. barbatus, D. annularis and P. erythrinus) from the study area and control area is shown in Table 1.

2.3. Chemical Analysis and Mercury Bioaccumulation

The total mercury concentration in fish species was measured using a direct mercury analyzer (Milestone DMA-80 atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Milestone, Bergamo, Italy). About 100 mg of wet sample (fish muscle of each specimen) were loaded into specific nickel boats and analyzed following the US-EPA 7473 method [40]. A Reference Standard Material (TORT-2 Lobster Hepatopancreas) was analyzed to assess accuracy (% recovery = 91–105%) and precision (routinely better than 8%; RSD%, n = 5).

2.4. DNA Extraction

Total DNA extraction was performed using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Each DNA sample was then analyzed using the Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in order to quantify the DNA concentration: measurements of 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm absorbance ratios were used to determine the quality and degree of purity.

2.5. mtDNAcn Evaluation

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis using the comparative Ct method were performed with the QuantStudio 1 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Walthman, MA, USA) to estimate the relative mtDNAcn. At this aim, the mitochondrial Cytb gene was selected as target gene while the nuclear 18S gene was used as reference gene (Table 2).
In each reaction 250 ng of total DNA were used in 20 µL of final volume containing 10 µL of SensiFAST SYBR master mix (Meridian BIOSCIENCE, Cincinnati, OH, USA) with ROX reference dye at low concentration (INVITROGEN, Waltham, MA, USA). Each set of reactions included a no template control and three technical replicates. qPCR conditions were performed following [24] experimental setup: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s and 60 °C for 20 s. A final step of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min and 95 °C for 1 s was included. Melt curves analysis were performed to detect non-specific PCR products.
Relative mtDNAcn for each sample was estimated according to Hartmann [43] and Rooney [44] equation: where cycle threshold (Ct) values of mitochondrial PCR products (mtDNA) were normalized to Ct-values of the nuclear locus (nDNA).
relative mtDNAcn = 2 × 2ΔCt
where ΔCt = Ct (nDNA gene) − Ct (mtDNA gene)
The variation in mtDNAcn in each fish species was obtained from the ratio between the mean of relative mtDNAcn value observed in the study area specimens and that exhibited by specimens of the same species taken in the control area. Finally, basing on the level of Hg bioaccumulation detected in each species collected in the SNI, when possible, the mtDNAcn variation will be assessed in fish showing medio-high level and high level of Hg bioaccumulation.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using GraphPad Prism version 8.3.0. for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com). The Mann-Whitney test was conducted to test the significance of the differences in mean observed between the two groups of specimens (polluted and control site samples) for M. barbatus and P. erythrinus, accepting those with p < 0.05 as significant values. For D. annularis statistically significant differences between the group SNI high Hg fish level, the group SNI medium-high Hg bioaccumulation fish level and the CTR group, was conducted thought the Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, accepting those with p < 0.05.

3. Results

Determination of mtDNAcn performed by qPCR amplification showed consistently higher Ct values for the mitochondrial target gene (Cytb) than for the nuclear target gene, which corresponds to a lower amplification rate. This result aligns with the fact that the 18S gene, used as the nuclear reference gene for calculating the relative mtDNAcn, is a tandemly repeated locus, so it shows higher amplification rates. Notably then, while Ct values for the nuclear gene were similar in specimens from both SNI and CTR sites in all species investigated, those for the mitochondrial target were very different in the two groups of organisms from the same species (Figure 2).
Since the variation of mtDNAcn between the two survey areas is given by the ratio of the relative copy number in each, a higher value of this ratio in the contaminated site will result in an increase of mtDNAcn in the SNI compared CTR. Conversely, a lower relative mtDNAcn in the SNI will correspond to a decrease in mtDNA compared to CTR. Analysis of the melting curves shows specific amplification products (Figure 3).
Analysis of the variation of mtDNAcn among the SNI specimens belonging to M. barbatus and P. erythrinus compared with their respective CTR shows a drastic reduction of the biomarker by 55% and 61%, respectively. The differences in mean values of mtDNAcn observed in the two groups (SNI vs. CTR) are statistically significant in both species with p < 0.005 in M. barbatus and p < 0.05 in P. erythrinus. It is noteworthy that, for both species in the study area, the bioaccumulation contents of Hg in muscle of SNI specimens, although significantly higher than those detected in the CTR specimens do not exceed the legal threshold of 1 µg/g fixed by the European Community Regulation (EC Reg.) 1881/2006, for the species under consideration (Figure 4). In D. annularis the legal threshold of bioaccumulation contents of Hg in muscle is set at 0.5 µg/g by EC Reg. 1881/2006. For this species two subgroups of specimens from SNI were analyzed having Hg levels above the legal threshold: the first subgroup with very high bioaccumulation content, comparable to those detected in M. barbatus and P. erythrinus and a second subgroup with medium to high levels of bioaccumulation.
Comparison between SNI and CTR specimens reveals a dramatic increase in mtDNAcn in the former. Specifically, in the first subgroup, an increase in copy number of about 20 times the average value observed in the CTR specimens is observed; in the second subgroup, the ratio of mtDNAcn is as much as 35 times higher in SNI than CTR. In both cases, the Mann-Whitney test reported statistically significant differences with p < 0.005 (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

The results obtained in the three target species (M. barbatus, P. erythrinus and D. annularis), indicate the existence of statistically significant variation in mitochondrial genome copy number as a cellular response to chronic exposure to chemical contaminants present in a highly impacted area such as the Augusta bay [30,37,45].
Fish species, in general, are particularly useful for assessing health status in the aquatic environment given their sensitivity to anthropogenic contaminants [33,46]. The choice of investigating the three mentioned species stems, on the one hand, from their commercial importance in Southeastern Sicily, which configures them as possible vectors of transfer of contaminants from the environment to humans through food; on the other hand, from the evaluation of their respective biological characteristics that place them in different ecological niches and trophic levels [47]. Such peculiarities could allow a better understanding of the mechanisms of contaminant transfer in biota (not considered in this study) and a more careful and integrated assessment of biological responses.
From the analysis of copy number variation carried out in the present study, apparently contrasting results emerge in the three target species. Specifically, in the specimens of M. barbatus and P. erythrinus from SNI, a significant reduction in the mitochondrial biomarker is observed compared with those from CTR, while D. annularis from SNI shows a significant increase in mtDNAcn. These results are not unexpected as both cellular responses are plausible. In fact, they appear to be compatible with the processes of mitochondrial fission and fusion, i.e., processes that lead, respectively, to the division of a mitochondrion into two smaller organelles and the union of two mitochondria into a larger one [48,49,50]. An increase in mitochondrial copy number occurs to accommodate the increased energy demand required to restore a condition of homeostasis; conversely, a decrease in mitochondrial genome copy number occurs when, at the cellular level, the system fails to compensate for the ongoing damage and mitophagy pathways are consequently activated in order to eliminate any damaged mitochondria [51,52].
More specifically, damage to mtDNA induces excessive ROS production through alteration of electron transport chain components, which in turn generates additional ROS fueling a vicious cycle. Such damage initially promotes mitochondrial genome replication, and thus an increase in mtDNAcn, sustained by mitochondrial fission events as a compensatory mechanism to increase energy production and remove damage to the mitogenome. However, following prolonged exposure to stressors, there is such an accumulation of mutations to mtDNA that this compensatory mechanism is irreversibly impaired, copy number decreases, and, as a result, mitochondria become dysfunctional by undergoing mitophagy [53,54,55].
It should be noted that a recent investigation [24] to a population of the sap-feeder insect, Opsius heydeni, from SNI the same contaminated area considered in this investigation, showed a significant decrease in mtDNAcn compared to specimens of the same species taken from a control site.
Several model organisms, from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans [56] to higher organisms (mice, hamster), have shown both in vitro and in vivo, an increase in mtDNAcn after exposure to infrared radiation [57,58,59]. Among terrestrial invertebrates, change in mtDNAcn, as a biomarker of mitochondrial dysfunction, has been studied, for example, in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster in response to exposure to ochratoxin A. Again, exposure to the pro-oxidant agent resulted in an increase in mtDNAcn [21].
In the aquatic environment, the implementation of mtDNAcn variation for environmental monitoring has been validated on different animal groups. Kim et al. observed that exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (particularly fluoranthene and pyrene) resulted in a significant increase in mitochondrial genome copy number in the zebrafish Danio rerio [60].
In contrast, exposure to sub-lethal doses of the broad-spectrum insecticide bifenthrin in Puntius sophore, an edible fish species widespread in Asian freshwater, resulted in significant reduction of mtDNAcn in brain, liver, and muscle tissue [61]. In the sea turtle Lepidochelys olivacea, the change in copy number was related to the presence of a congenital malformation related to exposure to high levels of Hg. However, the investigation showed an apparent absence of association between the parameters investigated in the experimental groups [62]. Bowman et al., next determined mitogenome levels, in association with other cellular biomarkers (apoptosis and mutation rates in mtDNA), to define the effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin of large marine mammals. The study showed a decrease in the mitochondrial genome in correlation with increased levels of UV-induced skin vesicles suggesting mtDNAcn variation as a valid biomarker of the effects of global warming in the marine environment [63]. Furthermore, the effects of exposure to environmentally important levels of dibutyl phthalate were investigates in the early life stage of zebrafish. High levels of oxidative stress damaging mitochondrial ultrastructure and function were observed which induce also the inhibition of mtDNAcn. In this case a downregulation of mRNA expression of mitochondrial fusion-related genes and an upregulation of fission-related genes were also detected [64].
Though studies on mtDNAcn variation in wildlife are scarce and often related to ageing [42,65,66], numerous investigations on the variation of this biomarker of oxidative stress induced by chemical, physical and environmental insults have been conducted on murine systems both in vitro and in vivo. In such model organisms, chronic exposure to chemical contaminants has shown, for example, a dose-dependent reduction between mtDNAcn and exposure to heavy metals [67] or ultrafine particulate matter [68]. In other cases, however, there has been an increase in mtDNAcn levels in response to exposure to secondhand smoke [69], infrared radiation [57] and proton beams [70]. Such evidence reinforces the theory that increased levels of mtDNAcn may help counteract mitochondrial dysfunction associated with increased oxidative stress, promoting, among others, the development of neurodegenerative diseases and the induction of carcinogenesis [70].
In some cases, the mtDNAcn levels can both increase and decrease within the same species in relation to, for example, the chronicity of the insult to which the organism is exposed. In this regard, a relationship between mtDNAcn and the effects of global warming was observed in the study by Li et al. in the white shrimp (Palaemon carinicauda). As water temperature and salinity increased, an initial increase in mtDNAcn was reported. However, a further increase in salinity induced a decrease in mtDNAcn consistent with irreversible impairment of mitochondrial function. In fact, ROS are generated during osmotic pressure regulation, which in turn induces oxidative stress. The authors therefore suggest that once the increase in salinity (and the simultaneous stimulation of mtDNA replication and ROS accumulation) exceeds a threshold value, mtDNA replication is disrupted due to polymerase blockade and, consequently, copy number is decreased [23]. The study by Syromyatnikov et al. reported the change in mtDNAcn as an effect of pesticide exposure in Bombus terrestris, one of the most important pollinators for agriculture, which is currently threatened with severe extinction risk mainly due to the intensive use of these xenobiotics. Interestingly, a different cellular response has been detected in relation to pesticide toxicity. Specifically, the action of systemic pesticides results in an increase in mtDNAcn, as a compensatory mechanism to the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration, while broad-spectrum pesticides act more heavily resulting in a significant decrease in the biomarker indicative, in turn, of irreversible mitochondrial dysfunction [71].
In the present study, as already described, at the same Hg bioaccumulation contents in the muscle tissue of specimens from the Augusta Bay, mtDNAcn levels are found to be halved for M. barbatus and P. erythrinus, while they are greatly increased in D. annularis. In this context, it is therefore necessary to clarify two aspects: (i) to interpret the differences found between the species analyzed and (ii) to identify a possible trend in the response observed in D. annularis. Regarding the first point, it is useful to consider the growth curves of the three species in order to highlight that D. annularis specimens being younger (about 1 year of age) than those of the other two target species sampled in the impacted area (3–4 years of age), but showing the same level of Hg bioaccumulation, probably exhibit a more efficient cellular response system towards damage from oxidative stress [42]. This response would be part of the compensatory mechanism of inhibition of cellular respiration resulting in increased mtDNAcn. In contrast, for M. barbatus and P. erythrinus, the longer exposure time to contaminants related to older age may have already impaired mitochondrial function resulting in a significant decrease in mtDNAcn. Taking the second point into consideration, it is useful to compare the mitochondrial copy number variation values observed in the D. annularis specimens with medium to high Hg levels with those detected in the group of specimens with high bioaccumulation values. It is observed that an even more pronounced increase in copy number is appreciated in the former than in the latter, confirming the trend of change in mtDNAcn [62], namely a rapid initial increase that undergoes a gradual decrease as bioaccumulation levels increase.

5. Conclusions

The present study represents one of the first investigation aimed at filling knowledge gap on the effect of mercury on mitochondrial stability in non-farmed fish species living in contaminated areas. To this end, a reproducible experimental setup was developed to detect mtDNAcn variation in three fish species characterized by high levels of bioaccumulation of Hg that is a potent pro-oxidant agent. The results obtained were interpreted considering that the primary cellular response to ROS generation is sustained by an increased mitogenome replication rate: in this case the increased mtDNAcn is suggested to be a valid early warning biomarker of contaminant exposure. Furthermore, it has been highlighted that upon chronic exposure to the contaminant, albeit at sub-lethal doses, the compensatory mechanism is compromised resulting in a reduction of mtDNAcn: in this case the decreased mtDNAcn is suggested to be a possible biomarker of effect to chronic xenobiotic exposure in marine environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G., V.F. and A.M.P.; methodology, M.G., G.S.C., A.T., M.B. and A.M.P.; formal analysis, M.G.; data curation, M.G. and G.S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G., V.F. and A.M.P.; writing—review and editing, M.G., V.F., A.T., M.S. and A.M.P.; supervision, A.M.P.; funding acquisition, V.F. and A.M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was founded by the PhD in Earth and Environmental Sciences of the University of Catania and by the project of the National Research Council (CNR) MAR- Studio e Monitoraggio Aree marine a Rischio (DTA.AD006.133).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All fishes were caught and handled according to institutional and national guidelines and laws.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. van der Oost, R.; Beyer, J.; Vermeulen, N.P.E. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: A review. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2003, 57, 57–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ruiz, C.E.; Manuguerra, S.; Cuesta, A.; Esteban, M.A.; Santulli, A.; Messina, C.M. Sub-lethal doses of polybrominated diphenyl ethers affect some biomarkers involved in energy balance and cell cycle, via oxidative stress in the marine fish cell line SAF-1. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 210, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Messina, C.M.; Espinosa Ruiz, C.; Regoli, F.; Manuguerra, S.; D’Agostino, F.; Avellone, G.; Sprovieri, M.; Santulli, A. BDE-47 exposure modulates cellular responses, oxidative stress and biotransformation related-genes in Mytilus galloprovincialis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 107, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Authman, M.M.N.; Zaki, M.S.; Khallaf, E.A.; Abbas, H.H. Use of Fish as Bio-indicator of the Effects of Heavy Metals Pollution. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2015, 6, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tamele, I.J.; Loureiro, P.V. Lead, Mercury and Cadmium in Fish and Shellfish from the Indian Ocean and Red Sea (African Countries): Public Health Challenges. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Smith, S.B.; Gill, C.A.; Lunt, D.K.; Brooks, M.A. Regulation of fat and fatty acid composition in beef cattle. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 22, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thompson, L.V. Oxidative stress, mitochondria and mtDNA-mutator mice. Exp. Gerontol. 2006, 41, 1220–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Colombo, R.; Olmo, E. Biologia; Cellula e Tessuti; Edi Ermes: Milan, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee, H.-C.; Wei, Y.-H. Mitochondrial role in life and death of the cell. J. Biomed. Sci. 2000, 7, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yapa, N.M.B.; Lisnyak, V.; Reljic, B.; Ryan, M.T. Mitochondrial dynamics in health and disease. FEBS Lett. 2021, 595, 1184–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Castellani, C.A.; Longchamps, R.J.; Sun, J.; Guallar, E.; Arking, D.E. Thinking outside the nucleus: Mitochondrial DNA copy number in health and disease. Mitochondrion 2020, 53, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Filograna, R.; Mennuni, M.; Alsina, D.; Larsson, N.G. Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Human Disease: The More the Better? FEBS Lett. 2021, 595, 976–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Radzak, S.M.A.; Khair, S.Z.N.M.; Ahmad, F.; Patar, A.; Idris, Z.; Yusoff, A.A.M. Insights regarding mitochondrial DNA copy number alterations in human cancer (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2022, 50, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Avilés-Ramírez, C.; Moreno-Godínez, M.E.; Bonner, M.R.; Parra-Rojas, I.; Flores-Alfaro, E.; Ramírez, M.; Huerta-Beristain, G.; Ramírez-Vargas, M.A. Effects of exposure to environmental pollutants on mitochondrial DNA copy number: A meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 43588–43606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, W.J.; Li, C.; Huang, Z.; Geng, S.; Rao, V.S.; Kelly, T.N.; Hamm, L.L.; Grams, M.E.; Arking, D.E.; Appel, L.J.; et al. Association of Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number with Risk of Progression of Kidney Disease. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2022, 17, 966–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Picca, A.; Guerra, F.; Calvani, R.; Coelho-Júnior, H.J.; Leeuwenburgh, C.; Bucci, C.; Marzetti, E. The contribution of mitochondrial DNA alterations to aging, cancer, and neurodegeneration. Exp. Gerontol. 2023, 178, 112203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Alegría-Torres, J.A. The mitochondrial DNA copy number used as biomarker. Int. J. Mol. Biol. 2018, 3, 117–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bess, A.S.; Crocker, T.L.; Ryde, I.T.; Meyer, J.N. Mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy aid in removal of persistent mitochondrial DNA damage in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 7916–7931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reznik, E.; Miller, M.L.; Şenbabaoğlu, Y.; Riaz, N.; Sarungbam, J.; Tickoo, S.K.; Al-Ahmadie, H.A.; Lee, W.; Seshan, V.E.; Hakimi, A.A.; et al. Mitochondrial DNA copy number variation across human cancers. Elife 2016, 5, e10769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, Y.; Li, H.; Hedmer, M.; Hossain, M.B.; Tinnerberg, H.; Broberg, K.; Albin, M. Occupational exposure to particles and mitochondrial DNA-relevance for blood pressure. Environ. Health 2017, 16, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mutlu, A.G. Increase in Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Response to Ochratoxin a and Methanol-Induced Mitochondrial DNA Damage in Drosophila. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2012, 89, 1129–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sanders, L.H.; Howlett, E.H.; McCoy, J.; Greenamyre, J.T. Mitochondrial DNA Damage as a Peripheral Biomarker for Mitochondrial Toxin Exposure in Rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 142, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Z.H.; Zhang, P.; Ma, H.K.; Xu, W.Y.; Sun, J.Q.; Yan, B.L.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Gao, H. Effect of temperature and salinity on mtDNA copy number of the ridgetail white prawn, Palaemon carinicauda Holthuis, 1950 (Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Crustaceana 2018, 91, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Calogero, G.S.; Giuga, M.; D’Urso, V.; Ferrito, V.; Pappalardo, A.M. First Report of Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Variation in Opsius heydeni (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadellidae) from Polluted and Control Sites. Animals 2023, 13, 1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Frapiccini, E.; Panfili, M.; Guicciardi, S.; Santojanni, A.; Marini, M.; Truzzi, C.; Annibaldi, A. Effects of biological factors and seasonality on the level of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in red mullet (Mullus barbatus). Environ. Pollut. 2020, 258, 113742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kontas, A.; Alyuruk, H.; Bilgin, M.; Uluturhan, E.; Ünlüoğlu, A.; Darilmaz, E.; Altay, O. Metal Bioaccumulation and Potential Health Risk Assessment in Different Tissues of Three Commercial Fish Species (Merluccius merluccius, Mullus barbatus, and Pagellus erythrinus) from Edremit Bay (Aegean Sea), Turkey. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 200, 868–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Girolametti, F.; Frapiccini, E.; Annibaldi, A.; Illuminati, S.; Panfili, M.; Marini, M.; Santojanni, A.; Truzzi, C. Total Mercury (THg) content in red mullet (Mullus barbatus) from Adriatic Sea (Central Mediterranean Sea): Relation to biological parameters, sampling area and human health risk assessment. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Squillante, J.; Scivicco, M.; Ariano, A.; Nolasco, A.; Esposito, F.; Cacciola, N.A.; Severino, L.; Cirillo, T. Occurence of phtalate esters and preliminary data on microplastics in fish from the Tyrrhenian Sea (Italy) and impact on human health. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 316, 120664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Benedetti, M.; Romano, E.; Ausili, A.; Fattorini, D.; Gorbi, S.; Maggi, C.; Salmeri, A.; Manta, D.S.; Sesta, G.; Sprovieri, M.; et al. 10-year time course of Hg and organic compounds in Augusta Bay: Bioavailability and biological effects in marine organisms. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 968296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bonsignore, M.; Salvagio Manta, D.; Oliveri, E.; Sprovieri, M.; Basilone, G.; Bonanno, A.; Falco, F.; Traina, A.; Mazzola, S. Mercury in fishes from Augusta Bay (southern Italy): Risk assessment and health implication. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 56, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Copat, C.; Arena, G.; Fiore, M.; Ledda, C.; Fallico, R.; Sciacca, S. Heavy metals concentration in fish and shellfish from eastern Mediterranean Sea: Consumpion advisories. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 53, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bonsignore, M.; Andolfi, N.; Barra, M.; Madeddu, A.; Tisano, F.; Ingallinella, V.; Castorina, M.; Sprovieri, M. Assessment of mercury exposure in human populations: A status report from Augusta Bay (southern Italy). Environ. Res. 2016, 150, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Traina, A.; Bono, G.; Bonsignore, M.; Falco, F.; Giuga, M.; Quinci, E.M.; Vitale, S.; Sprovieri, M. Heavy metals concentrations in some commercially key species from Sicilian coasts (Mediterranean Sea): Potential human health risk estimation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 168, 466–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. ARPA. Convenzione per l’aggiornamento del Quadro Conoscitivo Sullo Stato di Qualità Delle Acque Sotterranee, Superficiali, Interne, Marino-Costiere ai Fini Della Revisione del Piano di Gestione del Distretto Idrografico Della Regione Sicilia; ARPA Sicilia: Palermo, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sprovieri, M.; Oliveri, E.; Di Leonardo, R.; Romano, E.; Ausili, A.; Gabellini, M.; Barra, M.; Tranchida, G.; Bellanca, A.; Neri, R.; et al. The key role played by the Augusta basin (southern Italy) in the mercury contamination of the Mediterranean Sea. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13, 1753–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Manuguerra, S.; Giuga, M.; Bonsignore, M.; Arena, R.; Traina, A.; Bellante, A.; Santulli, A.; Messina, C.M.; Sprovieri, M. Bioaccumulation, Markers of Stress, Welfare and Quality in Fish From an Impacted Area: The side Effects of the Contaminants in the Marine Food System. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024; submitted. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ausili, A.; Gabellini, M.; Cammarata, G.; Fattorini, D.; Benedetti, M.; Pisanelli, B.; Gorbi, S.; Regoli, F. Ecotoxicological and human health risk in a petrochemical district of southern Italy. Mar. Environ. Res. 2008, 66, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Messina, C.M.; Manuguerra, S.; Arena, R.; Espinosa-Ruiz, C.; Curcuraci, E.; Esteban, M.A.; Santulli, A. Contaminant-induced oxidative stress underlies biochemical, molecular and fatty acid profile changes, in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Res. Vet. Sci. 2023, 159, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Whitehead, P.J.P.; Bauchot, M.L.; Hureau, J.C.; Nielsen, J.; Tortonese, E. Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean; UNESCO: Bungay, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  40. Environmnetal Protection Agency. Method 7473: Mercury in Solids and Solutions by Thermal 420 Decomposition, Amalgamation, and Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry; US EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  41. Dwiyitno, D.; Hoffman, S.; Parmentier, K.; Van Keer, C. Universal primer design for crustacean and bivalve-mollusc authenticity based on cytochrome-b gene. Biodiversitas 2022, 23, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Messina, C.M.; Arena, R.; Manuguerra, S.; La Barbera, L.; Curcuraci, E.; Renda, G.; Santulli, A. Valorization of Side Stream Products from Sea Cage Fattened Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus): Production and In Vitro Bioactivity Evaluation of Enriched ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hartmann, N.; Reichwald, K.; Wittig, I.; Dröse, S.; Schmeisser, S.; Lück, C.; Hahn, C.; Graf, M.; Gausmann, U.; Terzibasi, E.; et al. Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number and Function Decrease with Age in the Short-Lived Fish Nothobranchius furzeri. Aging Cell 2011, 10, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rooney, J.P.; Ryde, I.T.; Sanders, L.H.; Howlett, E.H.; Colton, M.D.; Germ, K.E.; Mayer, G.D.; Greenamyre, J.T.; Meyer, J.N. PCR based determination of mitochondrial DNA copy number in multiple species. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1241, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Giuga, M. Impiego di Indicatori Chimici, Biochimici e Molecolari per la Valutazione Degli Effetti Indotti da Contaminanti Am-bientali in Organismi Marini: Dall’early Warning Alla Previsione Degli Effetti a Lungo Termine Sulle Performance. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Catania, Catania, Italy, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  46. Di Bella, C.; Traina, A.; Giosuè, C.; Carpintieri, D.; Lo Dico, G.M.; Bellante, A.; Del Core, M.; Falco, F.; Gherardi, S.; Uccello, M.M.; et al. Heavy metals and PAHs in meat, milk and seafood from Augusta area (southern Italy): Contamination levels, dietary intake and human exposure assessment. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Relini, G.; Bertrand, J.; Zamboni, A. Sintesi delle conoscenze sulle risorse da pesca dei fondi del Mediterraneo centrale (Italia e Corsica). Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 1999, 6, 1–868. [Google Scholar]
  48. Osteryoung, K.W.; Nunnari, J. The Division of Endosymbiotic Organelles. Science 2003, 302, 1698–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chan, D.C. Mitochondrial Fusion and Fission in Mammals. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Karbowski, M.; Youle, R.J. Dynamics of Mitochondrial Morphology in Healthy Cells and during Apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2003, 10, 870–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Roubicek, D.A.; de Souza-Pinto, N.C. Mitochondria and Mitochondrial DNA as Relevant Targets for Environmental Contaminants. Toxicology 2017, 391, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Malik, A.N.; Czajka, A. Is Mitochondrial DNA Content a Potential Biomarker of Mitochondrial Dysfunction? Mitochondrion 2013, 13, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Youle, R.J.; van der Bliek, A. Mitochondrial Fission, Fusion, and Stress. Science 2012, 337, 1062–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jones, M.D.; Naylor, K. Simple to Complex: The Role of Actin and Microtubules in Mitochondrial Dynamics in Amoeba, Yeast, and Mammalian Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hu, Z.; Xu, L.; Song, H.; Feng, J.; Zhou, C.; Yang, M.J.; Shi, P.; Li, Y.R.; Guo, Y.J.; Li, H.Z.; et al. Effect of heat and hypoxia stress on mitochondrion and energy metabolism in the gill of hard clam. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 266, 109556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Maremonti, E.; Brede, D.A.; Olsen, A.-K.; Eide, D.M.; Berg, E.S. Ionizing radiation, genotoxic stress, and mitochondrial DNA copy-number variation in Caenorhabditis elegans: Droplet digital PCR analysis. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2020, 858–860, 503277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Malakhova, L.; Bezlepkin, V.G.; Antipova, V.; Ushakova, T.; Fomenko, L.; Sirota, N.; Gaziev, A.I. The increase in mitochondrial DNA copy number in the tissues of γ-irradiated mice. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2005, 10, 721. [Google Scholar]
  58. Nugent, S.; Mothersill, C.E.; Seymour, C.; McClean, B.; Lyng, F.M.; Murphy, J.E.J. Altered mitochondrial function and genome frequency post exposure to γ-radiation and bystander factors. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2010, 86, 829–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kam, W.; Lake, V.; Banos, C.; Davies, J.; Banati, R. Apparent polyploidization after gamma irradiation: Pitfalls in the use of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for the estimation of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA gene copy numbers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11544–11559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, H.-R.; Kang, M.-G.; Trang, N.T.D.; Baek, H.-J.; Moon, J.-D.; Shin, J.-H.; Suh, S.-P.; Ryang, D.-W.; Kook, H.; et al. Profiling of Biomarkers for the Exposure of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Lamin-A/C Isoform 3, Poly[ADP-Ribose] Polymerase 1, and Mitochondria Copy Number Are Identified as Universal Biomarkers. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 605135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Das, A.; Bank, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Paul, N.; Sarkar, K.; Chatterjee, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Banerjee, C.; Majumdar, A.; Das, M.; et al. Bifenthrin disrupts cytochrome c oxidase activity and reduces mitochondrial DNA copy number through oxidative damage in pool barb (Puntius sophore). Chemosphere 2023, 332, 138848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Martín-del-Campo, R.; Bárcenas-Ibarra, A.; Lund, G.; Rodríguez-Rìos, D.; Yong-Villalobos, L.; García-Hernandez, J.; García-Gasca, A. Mercury Concentration, DNA Methylation, and Mitochondrial DNA Damage in Olive Ridley Sea Turtle Embryos With Schistosomus Reflexus Syndrome. Vet. Pathol. 2019, 56, 940–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bowman, A.; Martinez-Levasseur, L.M.; Acevedo-Whitehouse, K.; Gendron, D.; Birch-Machin, M.A. The simultaneous detection of mitochondrial DNA damage from sun-exposed skin of three whale species and its association with UV-induced microscopic lesions and apoptosis. Mitochondrion 2013, 13, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fan, X.; Zhang, D.; Hou, T.; Zhang, Q.; Tao, L.; Bian, C.; Wang, Z. Mitochondrial DNA stress-mediated health risk to Dibutyl Phthalate contamination on Zebrafish (Danio rerio) at early life stage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 7731–7742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Baek, J.H.; Son, H.; Jeong, Y.H.; Park, S.W.; Kim, H.J. Chronological Aging Standard Curves of Telomere Length and Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Twelve Tissues of C57BL/6 Male Mouse. Cells 2019, 8, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Stier, A.; Hsu, B.-Y.; Marciau, C.; Doligez, B.; Gustafsson, L.; Bize, P.; Ruuskanen, S.; Stier, A.; Hsu, B.-Y.; Marciau, C.; et al. Born to be young? Prenatal thyroid hormones increase early-life telomere length in wild collared flycatchers. Biol. Lett. 2020, 16, 20200364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; An, Z.; Huang, D.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, Y. Mediating effect of ROS on mtDNA damage and low ATP content induced by arsenic trioxide in mouse oocytes. Toxicol. In Vitro 2011, 25, 979–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xia, T.; Korge, P.; Weiss, J.N.; Li, N.; Venkatesen, M.I.; Sioutas, C.; Nel, A. Quinones and Aromatic Chemical Compounds in Particulate Matter Induce Mitochondrial Dysfunction: Implications for Ultrafine Particle Toxicity. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 1347–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fetterman, J.L.; Sammy, M.J.; Ballinger, S.W. Mitochondrial toxicity of tobacco smoke and air pollution. Toxicology 2017, 391, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Abdullaev, S.; Bulanova, T.; Timoshenko, G.; Gaziev, A.I. Increase of mtDNA number and its mutant copies in rat brain after exposure to 150 MeV protons. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 4815–4820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Syromyatnikov, M.Y.; Gureev, A.P.; Mikhaylov, E.V.; Parshin, P.A.; Popov, V.N. Pesticides Effect on the Level of MtDNA Damage in Bumblebees Heads (Bombus terrestris L.). Period. Tche Quim. 2020, 17, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling stations of fish (F1–F8) in the study area (A) shown on a map of the spatial distribution of Hg in sediments adapted from Sprovieri et al. [35] and in the control area (B) (adapted from [36]).
Figure 1. Sampling stations of fish (F1–F8) in the study area (A) shown on a map of the spatial distribution of Hg in sediments adapted from Sprovieri et al. [35] and in the control area (B) (adapted from [36]).
Biology 13 00691 g001
Figure 2. qPCR amplification plot comparing, in triplicate, 2 samples of D. annularis: one taken in the SIN (50F) and the other in Marzamemi (117F). The plot shows the fluorescence rate of the SYBR Green dye, denoted as ΔRn, versus the number of PCR cycles for the two targets: Cytb (red curve) and 18S (blue curve). A lower Ct represents a higher DNA copy number in the initial sample. In the example shown, a higher mtDNAcn level is observed in the 50F sample from the contaminated site.
Figure 2. qPCR amplification plot comparing, in triplicate, 2 samples of D. annularis: one taken in the SIN (50F) and the other in Marzamemi (117F). The plot shows the fluorescence rate of the SYBR Green dye, denoted as ΔRn, versus the number of PCR cycles for the two targets: Cytb (red curve) and 18S (blue curve). A lower Ct represents a higher DNA copy number in the initial sample. In the example shown, a higher mtDNAcn level is observed in the 50F sample from the contaminated site.
Biology 13 00691 g002
Figure 3. Melting curves of the 18S gene (green curve) and Cytb target (orange curve) for a triplicate fish sample. The absence of nonspecific amplification products is shown.
Figure 3. Melting curves of the 18S gene (green curve) and Cytb target (orange curve) for a triplicate fish sample. The absence of nonspecific amplification products is shown.
Biology 13 00691 g003
Figure 4. Comparative summary of the results in the three selected species from contaminated (SNI) and control (CTR) areas: total mercury (THg) bioaccumulation plots in fish muscle (left) and respective mtDNAcn variation (right). Different boxplots colors define the corresponding Hg level in biota. For M. barbatus and P. erythrinus statistically significant differences between SNI and CTR (Mann-Whitney) are denoted using * (p < 0.05) or ** (p < 0.005). For D. annularis statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between SNI high Hg fish level, SNI medium-high Hg fish level and CTR (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) are denoted using different letters. The figure reports also the admitted Hg level in fish for human consumption by the EC Reg. 1881/2006 (M. barbatus and P. erythrinus: dotted red line; D. annularis: continuous red line).
Figure 4. Comparative summary of the results in the three selected species from contaminated (SNI) and control (CTR) areas: total mercury (THg) bioaccumulation plots in fish muscle (left) and respective mtDNAcn variation (right). Different boxplots colors define the corresponding Hg level in biota. For M. barbatus and P. erythrinus statistically significant differences between SNI and CTR (Mann-Whitney) are denoted using * (p < 0.05) or ** (p < 0.005). For D. annularis statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between SNI high Hg fish level, SNI medium-high Hg fish level and CTR (Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) are denoted using different letters. The figure reports also the admitted Hg level in fish for human consumption by the EC Reg. 1881/2006 (M. barbatus and P. erythrinus: dotted red line; D. annularis: continuous red line).
Biology 13 00691 g004
Table 1. Sampling and ecological information, biometric data and level of mercury (Hg) biaccumulation in fish muscle of the selected species. SNI, Site on National Interest; CTR, control areas; s.d., standard deviation; w.w., wet weight.
Table 1. Sampling and ecological information, biometric data and level of mercury (Hg) biaccumulation in fish muscle of the selected species. SNI, Site on National Interest; CTR, control areas; s.d., standard deviation; w.w., wet weight.
SpeciesMarine HabitatSamplingTotal Length
(Mean ± s.d. in cm)
Weight
(Mean ± s.d. in g)
Hg w.w.
(Mean in μg g−1)
AreaStationFishing Gear
Mullus barbatusbenthic6SNIF 1-2-3trammel net19 ± 2.780.4 ± 31.50.84 ± 0.20
9CTRF 8trammel net16.6 ± 1.548.7 ± 12.90.30 ± 0.12
Pagellus erythrinusdemersal10SNIF 1-2-3trammel net19.4 ± 4.1109.6 ± 64.70.61 ± 0.24
8CTRF 4-5-6-7trammel net18.2 ± 2108.2 ± 48.70.25 ± 0.10
Diplodus annularisdemersal10SNIF 1-2-3trammel net12.7 ± 0.735.8 ± 5.60.84 ± 0.24
10CTRF 4-5-6-7trawl net13.1 ± 1.540.7 ± 130.34 ± 0.11
Table 2. Sequences of the primers used for qPCR.
Table 2. Sequences of the primers used for qPCR.
GeneSequence 5′–3′T° of AnnealingReferences
CytbF: CCATCCAACATCTCAGCATGATGAAA
R: CCCCTCAGAATGATATTTGTCCTCA
60 °C[41]
18SF: TGTGCCCTAGAGGTGAAATT
R: GCAAATGCTTTCGTTTCG
60 °C[42]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giuga, M.; Ferrito, V.; Calogero, G.S.; Traina, A.; Bonsignore, M.; Sprovieri, M.; Pappalardo, A.M. Differential Cellular Response to Mercury in Non-Farmed Fish Species Based on Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Variation Analysis. Biology 2024, 13, 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090691

AMA Style

Giuga M, Ferrito V, Calogero GS, Traina A, Bonsignore M, Sprovieri M, Pappalardo AM. Differential Cellular Response to Mercury in Non-Farmed Fish Species Based on Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Variation Analysis. Biology. 2024; 13(9):691. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giuga, Marta, Venera Ferrito, Giada Santa Calogero, Anna Traina, Maria Bonsignore, Mario Sprovieri, and Anna Maria Pappalardo. 2024. "Differential Cellular Response to Mercury in Non-Farmed Fish Species Based on Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Variation Analysis" Biology 13, no. 9: 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop