Next Article in Journal
A Nonisolated Transformerless High-Gain DC–DC Converter for Renewable Energy Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Depth Estimation Method for Monocular Camera Defocus Images in Microscopic Scenes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Modified Marx Generator Circuit with Enhanced Tradeoff between Voltage and Pulse Width for Electroporation Applications

Electronics 2022, 11(13), 2013; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11132013
by Selvakumar Ganesan 1, Debarshi Ghosh 1, Ashu Taneja 1,*, Nitin Saluja 1, Shalli Rani 1,*, Aman Singh 2,3, Dalia H. Elkamchouchi 4 and Irene Delgado Noya 2,3
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2022, 11(13), 2013; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11132013
Submission received: 20 May 2022 / Revised: 17 June 2022 / Accepted: 24 June 2022 / Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Bioelectronics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

After the read the paper, I found several drawbacks that need to be revised.

1.     The explanation of fig. 5is very simple. More details are required. Figure 5 is blurry.

2.     For my knowledge, Proteus is adequete for low-voltage, not High-Voltage.

3.     Since the circuit proposed is simple, experimental results are mandatory.

4.     Slew-rate simulations and experimental results must be shown.

5.     Disadvantages of the proposed circuit must be mentioned.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

According to this reviewer's opinion, this manuscript is suitable for publication in Electronics on the understanding that the authors will elaborate the manuscript complying with the comments that are listed below:

1. The conclusions should be rewritten for the readers to better understand the research outcomes of the presented research paper (for example with the use of bulletpoints).

2. The font size in Figures 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 should be increased in order to comply with the paper format.

3. The resolution of Figure 5 should be modified (increase the Figure DPI).

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

In this second round, my questions were addressed. Hence, I have no inconvenient to accept this work

Back to TopTop