A Modified Marx Generator Circuit with Enhanced Tradeoff between Voltage and Pulse Width for Electroporation Applications
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
After the read the paper, I found several drawbacks that need to be revised.
1. The explanation of fig. 5is very simple. More details are required. Figure 5 is blurry.
2. For my knowledge, Proteus is adequete for low-voltage, not High-Voltage.
3. Since the circuit proposed is simple, experimental results are mandatory.
4. Slew-rate simulations and experimental results must be shown.
5. Disadvantages of the proposed circuit must be mentioned.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
According to this reviewer's opinion, this manuscript is suitable for publication in Electronics on the understanding that the authors will elaborate the manuscript complying with the comments that are listed below:
1. The conclusions should be rewritten for the readers to better understand the research outcomes of the presented research paper (for example with the use of bulletpoints).
2. The font size in Figures 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 should be increased in order to comply with the paper format.
3. The resolution of Figure 5 should be modified (increase the Figure DPI).
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
In this second round, my questions were addressed. Hence, I have no inconvenient to accept this work