Next Article in Journal
Self-HCL: Self-Supervised Multitask Learning with Hybrid Contrastive Learning Strategy for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Scalability of C-V2X and DSRC Vehicular Communication Protocols with LoRa 2.4 GHz in the Scenario of Urban Traffic Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Documentation and Virtual Web Navigation System for the Indoor and Outdoor Exploration of a Complex Cultural Heritage Site
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resilience against Catastrophic Cyber Incidents: A Multistakeholder Analysis of Cyber Insurance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

An Architecture of Enhanced Profiling Assurance for IoT Networks

Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2024, 13(14), 2832; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142832
Submission received: 31 May 2024 / Revised: 15 July 2024 / Accepted: 16 July 2024 / Published: 18 July 2024

Abstract

Attacks launched from IoT networks can cause significant damage to critical network systems and services. IoT networks may contain a large volume of devices. Protecting these devices from being abused to launch traffic amplification attacks is critical. The manufacturer usage description (MUD) architecture uses pre-defined stateless access control rules to allow or block specific network traffic without stateful communication inspection. This can lead to false negative filtering of malicious traffic, as the MUD architecture does not include the monitoring of communication states to determine which connections to allow through. This study presents a novel solution, the enhanced profiling assurance (EPA) architecture. It incorporates both stateless and stateful communication inspection, a unique approach that enhances the detection effectiveness of the MUD architecture. EPA contains layered intrusion detection and prevention systems to monitor stateful and stateless communication. It adopts three-way decision theory with three outcomes: allow, deny, and uncertain. Packets that are marked as uncertain must be continuously monitored to determine access permission. Our analysis, conducted with two network scenarios, demonstrates the superiority of the EPA over the MUD architecture in detecting malicious activities.
Keywords: manufacturer usage description; network behaviour analysis; three-way decision theory; stateful inspection; malicious behaviour detection manufacturer usage description; network behaviour analysis; three-way decision theory; stateful inspection; malicious behaviour detection

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aroon, N.; Liu, V.; Kane, L.; Li, Y.; Tesfamicael, A.D.; McKague, M. An Architecture of Enhanced Profiling Assurance for IoT Networks. Electronics 2024, 13, 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142832

AMA Style

Aroon N, Liu V, Kane L, Li Y, Tesfamicael AD, McKague M. An Architecture of Enhanced Profiling Assurance for IoT Networks. Electronics. 2024; 13(14):2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142832

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aroon, Nut, Vicky Liu, Luke Kane, Yuefeng Li, Aklilu Daniel Tesfamicael, and Matthew McKague. 2024. "An Architecture of Enhanced Profiling Assurance for IoT Networks" Electronics 13, no. 14: 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142832

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop