Next Article in Journal
Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses and Rhizobacterial Biostimulants: Metabolomics and Epigenetics Perspectives
Next Article in Special Issue
Concentrations of Fecal Bile Acids in Participants with Functional Gut Disorders and Healthy Controls
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomics and Dual RNA-Sequencing on Root Nodules Revealed New Cellular Functions Controlled by Paraburkholderia phymatum NifA
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Metabolic Model of Intestinal Secretions: The Link between Human Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer Progression

Metabolites 2021, 11(7), 456; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11070456
by Pejman Salahshouri 1, Modjtaba Emadi-Baygi 1,2, Mahdi Jalili 3, Faiz M. Khan 4, Olaf Wolkenhauer 4 and Ali Salehzadeh-Yazdi 4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Metabolites 2021, 11(7), 456; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11070456
Submission received: 2 July 2021 / Revised: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2021 / Published: 15 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host-Microbe-Metabolite Interaction in Intestinal Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised version is now suitable for the publication in Metabolites

Author Response

We appreciate it.

Reviewer 2 Report

The revised version of the manuscript has been improved regarding a more elaborate description of the used methodology. Also, previous works using the same database (MGYS00001248) have been cited. However, the article remains merely descriptive, and in the discussion, no new information to correlate the metabolic changes with the angiogenesis, inflammation, mutation rates, have been presented. This is a time-consuming effort, but it needed to highlight the biological meaning of this article. New figures and schemes should be included in the manuscript or the supplemental material (and therefore the number of figures already in place or that is a time-consuming effort do not justify that they are not presented) since they are needed to justify the relevance of the finding presented in the manuscript.

Author Response

Thank you very much. We also agree with your suggestion. Therefore, we created a new figure (Supplementary figure 1) and summarized the main results in that figure.

Back to TopTop