Next Article in Journal
LDL Promotes Disorders in β-Cell Cholesterol Metabolism, Implications on Insulin Cellular Communication Mediated by EVs
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolite Identification of HIV-1 Capsid Modulators PF74 and 11L in Human Liver Microsomes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cross-Sectional Blood Metabolite Markers of Hypertension: A Multicohort Analysis of 44,306 Individuals from the COnsortium of METabolomics Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/metabo12080753
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metabolite Signature of Simvastatin Treatment Involves Multiple Metabolic Pathways

by
Lilian Fernandes Silva
1,
Rowmika Ravi
1,
Jagadish Vangipurapu
1 and
Markku Laakso
1,2,*
1
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Internal Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
2
Department of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2022, 12(8), 753; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080753
Submission received: 26 July 2022 / Revised: 10 August 2022 / Accepted: 13 August 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolomics of Heart Failure and Its Comorbidities)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Statins inhibit the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase enzyme and are the most widely used medication for hypercholesterolemia. Previous studies on the metabolite signature of simvastatin treatment have included only a small number of metabolites. We performed a high-throughput liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy profiling on the effects of simvastatin treatment on 1098 metabolite concentrations in the participants of the METSIM (Metabolic Syndrome In Men) study including 1332 participants with simvastatin treatment and 6200 participants without statin treatment. We found that simvastatin exerts profound pleiotropic effects on different metabolite pathways, affecting not only lipids, but also amino acids, peptides, nucleotides, carbohydrates, co-factors, vitamins, and xenobiotics. We identified 321 metabolites significantly associated with simvastatin treatment, and 313 of these metabolites were novel. Our study is the first comprehensive evaluation of the metabolic signature of simvastatin treatment in a large population-based study.

1. Introduction

Hyperlipidemia is recognized as a major risk factor for ischemic heart disease and coronary mortality [1,2], a leading cause of death worldwide. An estimated 7.2 million people die each year from coronary heart disease [3]. Multiple trials have shown that statins significantly decrease low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) concentration and the risk of cardiovascular diseases [4,5]. Statins inhibit the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) enzyme and are the most widely used medication for hypercholesterolemia [6]. However, statin therapy increases the risk of diabetes [7]. Two Mendelian randomization studies have assessed whether an increase in the risk of diabetes is a consequence of inhibition of HMGCR. They used genetic variants in the HMGCR gene as proxies for HMGCR inhibition by statins, and both studies confirmed a causal association between statin treatment and an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) [8,9].
Statins also have beneficial effects not related to dyslipidemia. Simvastatin increases endothelial function [10], blocks the platelet-derived growth factor and fibrinogen-induced smooth muscle proliferation and migration [11], reduces plasminogen activation inhibitor [12], stabilizes atheromatous plaques [13], prevents the inhibitive action exerted by oxidized LDL on nitric oxide [14], and is anti-inflammatory [15]. These ‘pleiotropic’ effects of statins are not fully understood.
Metabolomics is a powerful tool to investigate metabolite profiles [16,17]. The largest study published so far to identify biomarkers associated with simvastatin treatment applied a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy method and included only 80 metabolites [18]. Mass spectrometry is a highly sensitive and accurate method for detection and quantitation of metabolites in a single measurement [19]. We performed a high-throughput liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy profiling on the effects of simvastatin treatment on metabolite concentrations in our large Finnish population-based cohort, the Metabolic Syndrome In Men (METSIM) study, including 7532 participants. Our hypothesis is that investigating the metabolite signature of simvastatin treatment offers a novel approach of obtaining new information about metabolic pathways explaining ‘pleiotropic’ effects of statins.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

The participants of our study were selected from the METSIM study comprising 10197 Finnish men randomly selected from the population register of Kuopio, Eastern Finland, aged from 45 to 73 years at baseline. The study design has been described previously in detail [20,21]. We excluded participants with diabetes defined by the American Diabetes Association criteria [22] from our analyses because hyperglycemia has effects on metabolite concentrations. Our study included 1332 participants on simvastatin treatment and 6200 participants without statin treatment. This subset of the METSIM study had similar clinical and laboratory characteristics as the entire METSIM population, and therefore it is a representative of the entire METSIM cohort. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kuopio University Hospital. All study participants gave written informed consent. All laboratory methods, including metabolomics analysis, were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

2.2. Clinical and Laboratory Measurements

Height was measured without shoes to the nearest 0.5 cm. Weight was measured in light clothing with a calibrated digital scale (Seca 877, Hamburg, Germany), and rounded up to the nearest 0.1 kg. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared. Waist and hip circumferences were measured to the nearest 0.5 cm. Laboratory studies after 12 h of fasting included plasma glucose and insulin, other relevant laboratory characteristics, and metabolomics (Metabolon, Durham, NC). An oral glucose tolerance test was performed to evaluate glucose tolerance (75 g of glucose). Clinical and laboratory measurement methods have been previously published [21]. Plasma glucose was measured by enzymatic hexokinase photometric assay (Konelab Systems Reagents, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Vantaa, Finland), and insulin by immunoassay (ADVIA Centaur Insulin IRI no. 02230141; Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA). Total triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were measured using enzymatic colorimetric methods (Konelab Systems Reagents; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vantaa, Finland).

2.3. Calculations

The Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (Matsuda ISI) and early-phase insulin secretion index (InsAUC0–30/GluAUC0–30) were calculated as previously described [21]. The disposition index (a marker of insulin secretion) was calculated as the Matsuda ISI × InsAUC0–30/GluAUC0–30.

2.4. Metabolomics Analysis

Metabolites were measured as part of Metabolon Inc.’s untargeted Discovery HD4 platform (Metabolon, Morrisville, NC, USA), as previously described in detail [23]. Briefly, methanol extraction of biochemicals followed by a non-targeted relative quantitative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were performed. The Metabolon Discovery HD4 platform was applied to assay named and unnamed metabolites. A total of 1098 unique metabolites were included in statistical analysis. The classification of the metabolites was based on the Human Metabolome Database (http://www.hmdb.ca, accessed on 1 June 2022).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25. We logarithmically transformed all variables due to their skewed distributions. We used one-way ANOVA to assess the differences in clinical and laboratory traits, and metabolites between the participants on simvastatin treatment and the participants without statin treatment. Next, we performed ANCOVA analyses on age, BMI, fasting glucose, and smoking as confounding factors. Metabolites having a p value < 4.5 × 10−5 were considered statistically significant given the 1098 metabolites included in the analysis.

3. Results

Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of the participants included in our study. There were small but statistically significant differences in age, BMI, waist circumference, glucose and insulin concentrations, LDL cholesterol, insulin sensitivity index (Matsuda ISI), and insulin secretion index (Disposition index) between the participants on simvastatin treatment and the participants without statin treatment.
Figure 1 shows the main classes and subclasses of metabolites significantly associated with simvastatin treatment. Amongst a total of 321 metabolites significantly associated with simvastatin treatment 79% were lipids. Simvastatin treatment was also significantly associated with other metabolite groups including amino acids (10%), peptides (5%), xenobiotics (3%), and co-factors and vitamins (1%).
Supplementary Table S1 shows the individual metabolites significantly associated with simvastatin treatment compared to participants without statin treatment. We found 313 novel previously unpublished metabolite associations in participants on simvastatin treatment compared to the control group. The most significant novel association in the amino acid class was with betaine (p = 2.1 × 10−48), a metabolite belonging to the glycine pathway. In the peptide class the most significant association of simvastatin treatment was with gamma-glutamylglutamate (p = 6.0 × 10−16), in the nucleotides class with uridine (p = 1.9 × 10−9), in the carbohydrates pathway N-acetylglucosaminylasparagine (p = 2.2 × 10−18), in the lipids class cholesterol (p = 1.0 × 10−196) and glycosyl ceramide (d18:1/20:0, d16:1/22:0) (p = 5.6 × 10−122), and in the xenobiotics class 2-hydroxyhippurate (salicylurate) (p = 4.7 × 10−38).

4. Discussion

Previous studies investigating the metabolic signature of simvastatin treatment have included only a small number of metabolites [18,24]. Our study shows for the first time a comprehensive metabolic signature of simvastatin treatment in 7532 participants with a total of 1098 metabolites measured.
Our study reports statistically significant changes in multiple metabolite concentrations in the participants on simvastatin treatment indicating that simvastatin exerts profound pleiotropic effects on different metabolite pathways, affecting not only lipids, but also amino acids, peptides, nucleotides, carbohydrates, co-factors, vitamins, and xenobiotics. We found 321 statistically significant differences in metabolite concentrations between the participants on simvastatin treatment compared to the participants not on statin treatment. A total of 313 of these associations were novel.
Simvastatin is transported into the liver by OATP1B1 transporter where it inhibits the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme [25] that suppresses the synthesis of mevalonate, cholesterol, and its downstream metabolites (Figure 2). Simvastatin inhibits prenylation [26] and activates AMP-protein kinase (AMPK), leading to the accumulation of acetyl-CoA and generation of 3-methylglutaconate (3-MG) [27].
Simvastatin is transported into the liver by OATP1B1 transporter, where it inhibits HMG-CoA reductase, resulting in an increase in LDL receptor expression in the liver. Cholesterol synthesis is decreased, and consequently, downstream metabolites of cholesterol, such as bile acids and steroids, are decreased. Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase results in an accumulation of acetyl-CoA, which can be directed to generate 3-methylglutaconate, leading to increased ROS generation. Simvastatin also leads to an increased metabolism of branched-chain amino acids and lysine, which generates an increase in short-chain acylcarnitines (C4, C4-DC, C5, and C5-DC).
As expected, the participants on simvastatin treatment had decreased concentrations of LDLC, bile acids, and steroids in our study. Although a decrease in total bile acids and testosterone in individuals on statin treatment has been previously described [28,29], we report for the first time that metabolites from these sub-pathways are associated with simvastatin treatment. We found 4 novel associations of simvastatin with secondary bile acids, and 18 novel associations with steroids, of which 7 belong to the androgenic steroid pathway and 8 to the pregnenolone pathway, suggesting that simvastatin regulates steroidogenesis. Additionally, we found higher concentrations of 3-MG in the participants on simvastatin treatment. Increased 3-MG is found in patients with statin-treatment-induced myopathy [30] and triggers oxidative stress in animal models [31].
Statins have been previously shown to upregulate mitochondrial acylcarnitine (AC) carrier gene expression [32], but a detailed metabolite profile of individual ACs has not been previously elucidated. We found novel increased concentrations of six novel short-chain ACs ((S)-3-hydroxybutyrylcarnitine, isobutyrylcarnitine (C4), isovalerylcarnitine (C5), 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine (C5), glutarylcarnitine (C5-DC), succinylcarnitine (C4-DC), and three medium-chain acylcarnitines, hexanoylcarnitine (C6), octanoylcarnitine (C8), cis-3,4-methyleneheptanoylcarnitine). Five of these metabolites were downstream metabolites of the degradation of the BCAAs (leucine, valine, isoleucine), and two were downstream metabolites of lysine degradation (Figure 2). Previous studies have reported that BCAA-derived C5-AC concentrations were higher in obese individuals and individuals with T2D compared with lean controls [32,33]. C4-DC AC, derived from BCAA metabolism, had a positive correlation with fasting glucose levels and HbA1c in a previous study [33]. There were increased concentrations of short-chain ACs in the participants on simvastatin treatment in our study; these participants also had increased concentrations of fasting and 2h glucose, and decreased insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion compared to participants not on statin treatment. Simvastatin has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of T2D [7,8,9,34], and short-chain ACs may increase this risk.
Although the lowering of lipid concentrations by simvastatin is well-known, the metabolic profile of lipids in individuals on statin treatment remains largely unknown given the lack of large population-based studies. We show for the first time a detailed metabolic profile of different lipids regulated by simvastatin treatment. Simvastatin downregulates two enzymes, fatty acid synthase (FAS) and diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) [35,36]. These enzymes decrease the synthesis of fatty acids (FAs) and the transfer of diacylglycerol (DAG) to neutral lipids, such as triacylglycerol. Simvastatin treatment also leads to upregulation of lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase 1, an enzyme that converts phosphatidic acid to DAG [37]. We found that the participants on simvastatin treatment had increased concentrations of eight DAGs, and decreased concentrations of two monoacylglycerols (MAGs) and eight long-chain FAs. Additionally, we found novel associations of simvastatin treatment with lower concentrations of 14 long-chain ACs, 15 plasmalogens, and 6 lyso-plasmalogens. Long-chain FAs are the precursors of fatty acyl-CoA, which is needed for the assembling of plasmalogens and its derivatives, lyso-plasmalogens, and for long-chain acylcarnitine generation [38,39]. Therefore, low concentrations of long-chain FAs might explain low concentrations of the metabolites having fatty acyl-CoA as their precursors.
Simvastatin increases choline levels [18], probably due to a decrease in the phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase activity, which prevents choline from being incorporated into phosphatidylcholine (PC) and sphingomyelins [40]. We confirmed increased concentrations of choline in the participants on simvastatin treatment and found new associations of simvastatin with decreased concentrations of 20 PCs and 24 lyso-PCs. Concentrations of ceramides, sphingomyelins, and the downstream metabolites hexosylceramides, sphingosines, and lactosylceramides were also decreased in the participants on simvastatin treatment. Decreased concentrations of sphingolipids could be explained by a decrease in fatty acyl-CoA coming from FAs. Additionally, it is possible that choline coming from PCs hydrolysis cannot be incorporated into the sphingosine backbone for sphingomyelin production [40,41,42]. Thus, simvastatin interferes with several pathways involved in lipid metabolism, including glycerolipids/free FA cycle, Lands cycle, sphingolipid pathway, and ether lipid pathway (Figure 3).
Simvastatin downregulates DGAT, which in turn decreases DAG incorporation into TAG droplets in the liver, resulting in an increase in DAG, and decreases in MAG and FFA concentrations. Simvastatin also decreases the incorporation of choline into PC and decreases the rate of the Kennedy pathway. Low concentrations of phospholipids (PCs and PIs) decrease the turnover of the Lands cycle and decrease the levels of lysophospholipids (lyso-PCs and lyso-PIs). PC is needed for sphingomyelin assembling, and low concentrations of PC decrease the concentrations of sphingomyelins, ceramides, and its downstream metabolites. FFAs are the precursors of long-chain acylcarnitines, N-acyl-amines, and the ether lipid pathway via generation of fatty acyl-CoA. Consequently, low levels of fatty acids result in decreased concentrations of long-chain acylcarnitines, N-acyl-amines, plasmalogens, and lyso-plasmalogens.
We showed that simvastatin has important effects on amino acid pathways, in contrast to a previous study suggesting that simvastatin has minimal effects on amino acids [18] (Figure 4). Our novel findings are that simvastatin increased concentrations of betaine, dimethylglycine, methionine, cystathione, and cysteine. Choline can be oxidized to betaine [43]. Betaine donates a methyl group to homocysteine to form methionine, generating dimethylglycine [44]. Homocysteine can be converted to cystathione, which can further be converted to cysteine [45]. Cysteine enters the gamma-glutamyl cycle to generate glutathione, which is critical to the response to oxidative stress [46]. Glutathione is reduced to cysteinyl-glycine and gamma-glutamyl amino acids [47]. The metabolism of glutathione promotes the release and recovery of constituent amino acids, such as glutamate and cysteine. We found increased levels of 12 novel gamma-glutamyl amino acids and glutamate in the participants on simvastatin use, indicating disruption of the gamma-glutamyl cycle in these participants.
Simvastatin increases levels of choline, which is oxidized to betaine. Betaine donates a methyl group to homocysteine to form methionine, generating dimethylglycine. Homocysteine can be converted to cystathione, and further to cysteine, which enters the ɣ-glutamyl cycle to generate GSH. GSH is critical to the response to oxidative stress. GSH is reduced by ɣ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) to cysteinyl-glycine and ɣ-glutamyl amino acids. Metabolism of GSH by GGT promotes the release and recovery of constituent amino acids, such as glutamate and cysteine. Increased levels of ɣ-glutamyl amino acids and glutamate indicates disruption of the ɣ-glutamyl cycle. Simvastatin decreases histidine levels and its downstream metabolite imidazole lactate, and increases levels of 1-methylhistidine, 1-methyl-5-imidazolelactate, formiminoglutamate, and N-acetylcarnosine. N-acetylcarnosine is a free-radical scavenger. Elevated levels of formiminoglutamate indicate disruption of folate metabolism. Formiminoglutamate can be converted to glutamate, which can be used to synthetize proline. Proline synthesis from glutamate helps to regenerate NAD+ towards the TCA cycle and facilitate ROS scavenging. Glutamate can generate putrescine via a series of enzymatic reactions, impacting the polyamine metabolism. Tryptophan and kynurenine were increased in the participants on simvastatin treatment. Kynurenine increases oxidative stress.
In our study, the participants on simvastatin treatment had decreased concentrations of histidine, as previously reported [18], and decreased concentrations of its downstream metabolite imidazole lactate. We found increased concentrations of four novel metabolites in the histidine pathway, 1-methylhistidine, 1-methyl-5-imidazolelactate formiminoglutamate, and N-acetylcarnosine. N-acetylcarnosine is a free-radical scavenger and is particularly active against lipid peroxidation [48]. Elevated concentrations of formiminoglutamate indicate disruption of folate metabolism [49]. Formiminotransferase converts formiminoglutamate to glutamate [45], and glutamate can be used to synthetize proline [45]. Simvastatin increases proline concentrations in mice [50]. Proline itself can act as a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger [51,52]. Thus, proline synthesis from glutamate helps to regenerate NAD+ towards the tricarboxylic acid cycle and facilitate ROS scavenging (Figure 4). Glutamate can generate putrescine through a series of enzymatic reactions [45]. We found increased levels of four metabolites belonging to the polyamine pathway. Tryptophan and kynurenine were also increased in the participants on simvastatin treatment. Kynurenine has been shown to increase oxidative stress [53].
In conclusion, the metabolic signature of simvastatin treatment is more complex than previously thought. Our novel findings were that the metabolic signature of simvastatin involves disturbances in several metabolite pathways, including lipids, steroids, degradation of BCAA, disturbances in the gamma-glutamyl cycle, folate, glutamate, and proline metabolism. Our findings show that the metabolic signature of simvastatin treatment includes metabolites involved in the generation of ROS, but also metabolites that act as ROS scavengers to keep the redox balance. Mechanistic studies are needed to investigate the role of these metabolites in simvastatin treatment. Therefore, it is too early to predict the clinical importance of multiple metabolic pathways we identified in the pleiotropic effects of statins.
The strength of our study is the large size of our population-based study, detailed metabolite analyses, and identification of several novel metabolites (especially short-chain acyl-carnitines and amino acids) associated with simvastatin treatment. The limitation of our study is that only middle-aged and elderly Finnish men were included, and therefore we do not know if the results are valid for women, all age groups, and other ethnic and racial groups.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/metabo12080753/s1, Table S1: Comparison between the levels of the metabolites in participants on simvastatin treatment and in participants not on simvastatin treatment.

Author Contributions

L.F.S. conceived the study, performed statistical analyses, and wrote the manuscript. R.R. researched metabolomics and revised the manuscript. J.V. performed statistical analyses, and revised the manuscript. M.L. conceived the study, wrote, reviewed the manuscript, supervised the entire study, and is the guarantor of the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The METSIM study was supported by grants from the Academy of Finland (321428), Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, and Centre of Excellence of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases supported by the Academy of Finland (0245896-3) (M.L.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kuopio University Hospital (number: 174/2004; approval: 29 November 2004), and it was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Informed Consent Statement

All study participants provided written informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to preserving the confidentiality of the participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial or non-financial interests.

References

  1. Stamler, J.; Wentworth, D.; Neaton, J.D. Is the relationship between serum cholesterol and risk of premature death from coronary heart disease continuous and graded? Findings in 356,222 primary screenees of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). JAMA 1986, 256, 2823–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Castelli, W.P.; Garrison, R.J.; Wilson, P.W.; Abbott, R.D.; Kalousdian, S.; Kannel, W.B. Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels: The Framingham Study. JAMA 1986, 256, 2835–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mackay, J.; Mensah, G.A.; Greenlund, K. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stone, N.J.; Robinson, J.G.; Lichtenstein, A.H.; Bairey Merz, C.N.; Blum, C.B.; Eckel, R.H.; Goldberg, A.C.; Gordon, D.G.; Levy, D.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; et al. ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, 2889–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Collins, R.; Reith, C.; Emberson, J.; Armitage, J.; Baigent, C.; Blackwell, L.; Blumenthal, R.; Danesh, J.; Smith, G.D.; DeMets, D.; et al. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet 2016, 388, 2532–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Statins for millions more? Lancet 2014, 383, 669. [CrossRef]
  7. Cederberg, H.; Stančáková, A.; Yaluri, N.; Modi, S.; Kuusisto, J.; Laakso, M. Increased risk of diabetes with statin treatment is associated with impaired insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion: A 6 year follow-up study of the METSIM cohort. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 1109–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Swerdlow, D.I.; Preiss, D.; Kuchenbaecker, K.B.; Holmes, M.V.; Engmann, J.E.L.; Shah, T.; Sofat, R.; Stender, S.; Johnson, P.C.D.; Robert, A.; et al. HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibition, type 2 diabetes, and bodyweight: Evidence from genetic analysis and randomised trials. Lancet 2015, 385, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, G.; Shi, M.; Mosley, J.D.; Weng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ta, M.; Lee, M.; Jarvik, G.P.; Hakonarson, H.; Namjou-Khaleset, B.; et al. A Mendelian Randomization approach using 3-HMG-coenzyme-A reductase gene variation to evaluate the association of statin-induced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering with noncardiovascular disease phenotypes. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2112820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, J.-I.; Jiang, D.-J.; Tang, Y.-H.; Li, N.-S.; Deng, H.-W.; Li, Y.J. Effect of simvastatin on endothelium-dependent vaso-relaxation and endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2004, 25, 893–901. [Google Scholar]
  11. Giurgea, A.G.; Margeta, C.; Maca, T.; Rezaie-Majd, A.; Bucek, R.A.; Manavi, M.; Afarideh, R.; Minar, E.; Baghestanian, M. Simvastatin reduces serum level of vascular endothelial growth factor in hypercholesterolemic patients. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2006, 47, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ludwig, S.; Dharmalingam, S.; Erickson-Nesmith, S.; Ren, S.; Zhu, F.; Ma, G.M.; Zhao, R.; Fenton, J.W.; Ofosu, F.A.; Velthuis, H.T.; et al. Impact of simvastatin on hemostatic andfibrinolytic regulators in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2005, 70, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shiomi, M.; Yamada, S.; Ito, T. Atheroma stabilizing effects of simvastatin due to depression of macrophages or lipid accumulation in the atheromatous plaques of coronary plaque-prone WHHL rabbits. Aherosclerosis 1998, 101, 2711–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hernández-Perera, O.; Pérez-Sala, D.; Navarro-Antolín, J.; Sánchez-Pascuala, R.; Hernández, G.; Díaz, C.; Lamas, L. Effects of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, atorvastatin and simvastatin, on the expression of endothelin-1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular endothelial cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 178, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kanda, H.; Yokota, K.; Kohno, C.; Sawada, T.; Sato, K.; Yamaguchi, M.; Komagata, Y.; Shimada, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Mimura, T. Effects of low-dosage simvastatin on rheumatoid arthritis through reduction of Th1/Th2 and CD4/CD8 ratios. Mod. Rheumatol. 2007, 17, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaddurah-Daouk, R.; Krishnan, K.R. Metabolomics: A global biochemical approach to the study of central nervous system diseases. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009, 34, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kaddurah-Daouk, R.; Kristal, B.S.; Weinshilboum, R.M. Metabolomics: A global biochemical approach to drug response and disease. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2008, 48, 653–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Würtz, P.; Wang, Q.; Soininen, P.; Kangas, A.J.; Fatemifar, G.; Tynkkynen, T.; Tiainen, M.; Perola, M.; Tillin, T.; Hughes, A.D.; et al. Metabolomic Profiling of Statin Use and Genetic Inhibition of HMG-CoA Reductase. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 1200–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nagana Gowda, G.A.; Djukovic, D. Overview of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: Opportunities and challenges. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1198, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  20. Laakso, M.; Kuusisto, J.; Stančáková, A.; Kuulasmaa, T.; Pajukanta, P.; Lusis, A.J.; Collins, F.S.; Mohlke, K.L.; Boehnke, M. The Metabolic Syndrome in Men study: A resource for studies of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. J. Lipid Res. 2017, 58, 481–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stancáková, A.; Javorský, M.; Kuulasmaa, T.; Haffner, S.M.; Kuusisto, J.; Laakso, M. Changes in insulin sensitivity and insulin release in relation to glycemia and glucose tolerance in 6,414 Finnish men. Diabetes 2009, 58, 1212–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fernandes Silva, L.; Vangipurapu, J.; Kuulasmaa, T.; Laakso, M. An intronic variant in the GCKR gene is associated with multiple lipids. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Trupp, M.; Zhu, H.; Wikoff, W.R.; Baillie, R.A.; Zeng, Z.B.; Karp, P.D.; Fiehn, O.; Krauss, R.M.; Kaddurah-Daouket, R. Metabolomics reveals amino acids contribute to variation in response to simvastatin treatment. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994, 344, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar]
  26. Maltese, W.A.; Aprille, J.R. Relation of mevalonate synthesis to mitochondrial ubiquinone content and respiratory function in cultured neuroblastoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 11524–11529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Su, B.; Ryan, R.O. Metabolic biology of 3-methylglutaconic acid-uria: A new perspective. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2014, 37, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Loria, P.; Bertolotti, M.; Cassinadri, M.T.; Dilengite, M.A.; Bozzoli, M.; Carubbi, F.; Concari, M.; Guicciardi, M.E.; Carulli, N. Short-term effects of simvastatin on bile acid synthesis and bile lipid secretion in human subjects. Hepatology 1994, 19, 882–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schooling, C.M.; Au Yeung, S.L.; Freeman, G.; Cowling, B.J. The effect of statins on testosterone in men and women, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med. 2013, 11, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Phillips, P.S.; Haas, R.H.; Bannykh, S.; Hathaway, S.; Gray, N.L.; Kimura, B.J.; Vladutiu, G.D.; England, J.D.F. Statin-associated myopathy with normal creatine kinase levels. Ann. Intern. Med. 2002, 137, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Leipnitz, G.; Seminotti, B.; Amaral, A.U.; de Bortoli, G.; Solano, A.; Schuck, P.F.; Wyse, A.T.; Wannmacher, C.M.; Latini, A.; Wajner, M. Induction of oxidative stress by the metabolites accumulating in 3-methylglutaconic aciduria in cerebral cortex of young rats. Life Sci. 2008, 82, 652–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Newgard, C.B.; An, J.; Bain, J.R.; Muehlbauer, M.J.; Stevens, R.D.; Lien, L.F.; Haqq, A.M.; Shah, S.H.; Arlotto, M.; Slentz, C.A.; et al. A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009, 9, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mihalik, S.J.; Goodpaster, B.H.; Kelley, D.E.; Chace, D.H.; Vockley, J.; Toledo, F.G.S.; DeLanye, J.P. Increased levels of plasma acylcarnitines in obesity and type 2 diabetes and identification of a marker of glucolipotoxicity. Obesity 2010, 18, 1695–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Laakso, M.; Kuusisto, J. Diabetes secondary to treatment with statins. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2017, 17, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Waterman, I.J.; Zammit, V.A. Differential effects of fenofibrate or simvastatin treatment of rats on hepatic microsomal overt and latent diacylglycerol acyltransferase activities. Diabetes 2002, 51, 1708–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Trub, A.G.; Wagner, G.R.; Anderson, K.A.; Crown, S.B.; Zhang, G.-F.; Thompson, J.W.; Ilkayeva, O.R.; Stevens, R.D.; Grimsrud, P.A.; Kulkarni, R.A.; et al. Statin therapy inhibits fatty acid synthase via dynamic protein modifications. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gbelcová, H.; Svéda, M.; Laubertová, L.; Varga, I.; Vítek, L.; Kolář, M.; Strnad, H.; Zelenka, J.; Böhmer, D.; Ruml, T. The effect of simvastatin on lipid droplets accumulation in human embryonic kidney cells and pancreatic cancer cells. Lipids Health Dis. 2013, 12, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Watkins, P.A. Fatty acyl-CoA synthetases. In Encyclopedia of Biological Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Lennarz, W.J., M. Lane, M.D., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 290–295. [Google Scholar]
  39. Grevengoed, T.J.; Klett, E.L.; Coleman, R.A. Acyl-CoA metabolism and partitioning. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2014, 34, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yanagita, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Ishida, S.; Sonda, K.; Morito, F.; Saku, K.; T Sakaie, T. Effects of simvastatin, a cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, on phosphatidylcholine synthesis in HepG2 cells. Clin. Ther. 1994, 16, 200–208. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, L.O.; Klett, E.L.; Coleman, R.A. Acyl-CoA synthesis, lipid metabolism and lipotoxicity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2010, 1801, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Momin, A.A.; Park, H.; Portz, B.J.; Haynes, C.A.; Shaner, R.L.; Kelly, S.L.; Jordan, I.K.; Merrill, J. A method for visualization of “omic” datasets for sphingolipid metabolism to predict potentially interesting differences. J. Lipid Res. 2011, 52, 1073–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wilken, D.R.; McMacken, M.L.; Rodriquez, A. Choline and betaine aldehyde oxidation by rat liver mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1970, 216, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Friesen, R.W.; Novak, E.M.; Hasman, D.; Innis, S.M. Relationship of dimethylglycine, choline, and betaine with oxoproline in plasma of pregnant women and their newborn infants. J. Nutr. 2007, 37, 2641–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Priolo, C.; Khabibullin, D.; Reznik, E.; Filippakis, H.; Ogórek, B.; Kavanagh, T.R.; Nijmeh, J.; Herbert, Z.T.; Asara, J.M.; Kwiatkowski, D.J.; et al. Impairment of gamma-glutamyl transferase 1 activity in the metabolic pathogenesis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E6274–E6282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Griffith, O.W.; Bridges, R.J.; Meister, A. Evidence that the gamma-glutamyl cycle functions in vivo using intracellular glutathione: Effects of amino acids and selective inhibition of enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1978, 75, 5405–5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wishart, D.S.; Feunang, Y.D.; Marcu, A.; Guo, A.C.; Liang, K.; Vázquez-Fresno, R.; Sajed, T.; Johnson, D.; Li, C.; Karu, N.; et al. HMDB 4.0: The human metabolome database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D608–D617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Majumdar, R.; Yori, A.; Rush, P.W.; Raymond, K.; Gavrilov, D.; Tortorelli, S.; Matern, D.; Rinaldo, P.; Feldman, G.L.; Oglesbee, D. Allelic spectrum of formiminotransferase-cyclodeaminase gene variants in individuals with formiminoglutamic aciduria. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2017, 5, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Grace, H.; McGregor, A.D.; Campbell, S.K.; Fey, S.K.; Tumanov, F.S.; Sumpton, D.; Blanco, G.R.; Mackay, G.; Nixon, C.; Vazquez, A.; et al. Targeting the metabolic response to statin-mediated oxidative stress produces a synergistic antitumor response. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 175–188. [Google Scholar]
  51. Liang, X.; Zhang, L.; Natarajan, S.K.; Becker, D.F. Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 998–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Smirnoff, N.; Cumbes, Q.J. Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of compatible solutes. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 1057–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mor, A.; Tankiewicz-Kwedlo, A.; Krupa, A.; Pawlak, D. Role of kynurenine pathway in oxidative stress during neurodegenerative disorders. Cells 2021, 10, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Metabolites 12 00753 g001 550
Figure 1. Lipids (79%) and amino acids (10%) were the most frequent groups of metabolites in 7532 participants included in our study. Among the lipids, glycerophospholipids (41%) were the most frequent subgroup of lipids, and histidine (19%) the most frequent subgroup of amino acids.
Figure 1. Lipids (79%) and amino acids (10%) were the most frequent groups of metabolites in 7532 participants included in our study. Among the lipids, glycerophospholipids (41%) were the most frequent subgroup of lipids, and histidine (19%) the most frequent subgroup of amino acids.
Metabolites 12 00753 g001
Metabolites 12 00753 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of simvastatin treatment on steroids, bile acids, dicarboxylic acids, branched-chain amino acids, lysine and short-chain acylcarnitines.
Figure 2. Effects of simvastatin treatment on steroids, bile acids, dicarboxylic acids, branched-chain amino acids, lysine and short-chain acylcarnitines.
Metabolites 12 00753 g002
Metabolites 12 00753 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of simvastatin treatment on lipid pathways.
Figure 3. Effects of simvastatin treatment on lipid pathways.
Metabolites 12 00753 g003
Metabolites 12 00753 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of simvastatin treatment on amino acid and peptide pathways and redox balance.
Figure 4. Effects of simvastatin treatment on amino acid and peptide pathways and redox balance.
Metabolites 12 00753 g004
Table
Table 1. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of participants without statin treatment and participants on simvastatin treatment.
Table 1. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of participants without statin treatment and participants on simvastatin treatment.
Clinical and Laboratory CharacteristicsParticipants on Simvastatin Treatment *Participants Not on Simvastatin Treatment *p Value **
nMeanSDnMeanSD
Age 133259.747,08620056.626.92<0.001
Body mass index133127.433.96619826.603.74<0.001
Waist (cm)133199.1110.85619796.8410.55<0.001
Systolic blood pressure1332137.8815.826200136.8116.28NS
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)13326.421.7462005.931.65<0.001
2 h plasma glucose (mmol/L)13325.790.4862005.690.48<0.001
Fasting plasma insulin (mU/L)13319.536.9361977.825.52<0.001
Matsuda ISI (mg/dl, mU/L)13205.713.4461677.334.29<0.001
Disposition index 1320153.2265.166167166.9073.62<0.001
LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)13322.710.7161973.570.82<0.001
Total triglycerides (mmol/L)13321.410.7262001.381.00NS
Smokers % 13.0% 16.6%-NS
* Only participants with metabolites available were included in statistical analyses. ** p value for ANOVA. Abbreviations: Matsuda ISI, Matsuda insulin sensitivity index; disposition index, insulin secretion index; NS, not statistically significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandes Silva, L.; Ravi, R.; Vangipurapu, J.; Laakso, M. Metabolite Signature of Simvastatin Treatment Involves Multiple Metabolic Pathways. Metabolites 2022, 12, 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080753

AMA Style

Fernandes Silva L, Ravi R, Vangipurapu J, Laakso M. Metabolite Signature of Simvastatin Treatment Involves Multiple Metabolic Pathways. Metabolites. 2022; 12(8):753. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080753

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandes Silva, Lilian, Rowmika Ravi, Jagadish Vangipurapu, and Markku Laakso. 2022. "Metabolite Signature of Simvastatin Treatment Involves Multiple Metabolic Pathways" Metabolites 12, no. 8: 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080753

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop