Next Article in Journal
Baseline Tyrosine Level Is Associated with Dynamic Changes in FAST Score in NAFLD Patients under Lifestyle Modification
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Phenolic Compounds Extraction and Antioxidant Activity from Inonotus hispidus Using Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Biosynthesis of Phytocannabinoids and Structural Insights: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Invasive Anemone Condylactis sp. of the Coral Reef as a Source of Sulfur- and Nitrogen-Containing Metabolites and Cytotoxic 5,8-Epidioxy Steroids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/metabo13030443
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytochemicals Identification and Bioactive Compounds Estimation of Artemisia Species Grown in Saudia Arabia

by
Abdalrhaman M. Salih
*,
Ahmed A. Qahtan
and
Fahad Al-Qurainy
Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2023, 13(3), 443; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030443
Submission received: 19 February 2023 / Revised: 11 March 2023 / Accepted: 14 March 2023 / Published: 17 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extraction, Characterization, Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Natural Metabolites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Artemisia species are very important medicinal plants, particularly in the Middle East and in developing countries. Their products have been used in traditional and medicine contemporary for the treating of infectious ulcers, gangrenous ulcers, inflammations, and malaria. Artemisinin derived from Artemisia species has been used as a drug in many countries for malaria disease treatment. Hence, this study aimed to identify and evaluate the bioactive compounds of three species of Artemisia (Artemisia judaica, Artemisia monosperma, and Artemisia sieberi) growing in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, several analytical techniques, such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), UV-Visible spectrophotometry (UV-Vis), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), with reference standards, were used. The GC-MS analysis of the artemisia species revealed many bioactive constituents associated with plant secondary metabolites; some of these identified phytochemical components have biological activity. A. Judaica showed the highest number of bioactive compounds, followed by A. sieberi and A. monosperma. Further, the total phenol, total flavonoid, total tannin, terpenoids, and TCA were estimated. Furthermore, biomolecules such gallic acid, tannin acid, quercetin, and artemisinin in different artemisia species were quantified using HPLC with the reference standard. The amount of artemisinin in the leaf extract of these species (A. sieberi, A. Judaica, and A. monosperma) was found to be about 3.01, 2.5, and 1.9 mg/g DW, respectively. Moreover, the antioxidant activity of the samples was estimated. The obtained results have shown that these species possessed high antioxidant activity, and the scavenging of the DPPH radical and hydrogen peroxide were found to be raised with the increase in the plant extract concentration. This reflects the number of bioactive compounds in these species. The findings of this research support and justify the utilization of Artemisia species in folk medicine in the Middle East.

1. Introduction

Artemisia L. is a genus of shrubs and herbs native to temperate Asia (northern temperate regions) [1,2] and it belongs to the Asteraceae family [3], which are mainly found in Asia, North America, and Europe [4]. Artemisia species are very important medicinal plants which are currently the subject of bioactive compounds attention because of their cosmetic products, essential oil production, chemical diversity, and biological activity [3,5,6]. For example, the extract of shoots, leaves, and flowers of Artemisia species is used traditionally for the treatment of different dieses such as infectious ulcers, inflammations, malaria, and gangrenous ulcers [7,8]. In addition, the oil obtained from Artemisia species has been used for hardly curable infectious ulcers treatment and has become famous due to its effects [9], which are insecticidal [10], anticancer [11], antimicrobial [12], and anti-malaria [13,14]. Further, the species of Artemisia is being used in the production of cosmetic products extensively [6].
Artemisinin (ART) is one of the most important compound deriveds from Artemisia species and has a powerful antimalarial drug with significant activities [15,16]. Additionally, it has been reported that ART as drug has saved the lives of many, particularly in developing countries [17,18]. Further, it has been reported that artemisinin compound and its bioactive derivatives are able to inhibit the metastasis and angiogenesis activity of some cancer cell lines [19].
Antioxidant components such as total phenol, total tannin, and total flavonoid content and their derivatives, such as gallic acid, tannic acid, and quercetin, are considered important nutraceuticals on account of their many health benefits [20]. In the literature, an expanding body of substantial evidence from epidemiological and laboratory studies have proven that some edible plants and their ingredients have antioxidant activities, which have substantial protective impacts on human carcinogenesis [21]. Artemisia species possess antioxidant properties which can interfere with oxidative stress to reduce the risk of developing complex diseases [22].
Some species (Artemisia judaica, Artemisia monosperma, and Artemisia sieberi) of the genus Artemisia L. are grown in the northern part of Saudi Arabia [23,24]. They are used widely in folk medicine [24] because these species have anthelmintic, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial analgesic, and antipyretic effects [23,24,25]. In addition, documented results showed that the A. judaica and A. sieberi species grow in Saudia Arabia have anticancer properties [22]. Moreover, these species showed high antimicrobial activities against human pathogens (Salmonella enteritidis and Escherichia coli) [23]. To our best knowledge, no report was found to be related to the comparative phytochemicals’ studies of these species. Therefore, this work aimed to identify and to estimate the phytochemical compounds of these species. Hence, GC-MS analysis was used for phytochemical constituents screening, a UV-Visible spectrophotometer with reagents was used for antioxidants estimation, whereas HPLC with specific standards was used for the chromatographical separation, identification, and estimation of important bioactive compounds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materia Collection

The leaves of three species of Artemisia (A. monosperma, A. Judaica, and A. sieberi) were collected during the winter season (January 2021) from the Hail area, the northern part of Saudi Arabia. Voucher specimens (*23396# A. sieberi, *23666# A. monosperma, and *11413# A. judaica) were deposited in the herbarium (http://www.plantdiversityofsaudiarabia.info/Biodiversity-SaudiArabia/Flora/Flora.htm) (accessed on 1 January 2023) of the Botany and Microbiology Department, King Saud University. The collected leaves were washed well to remove the unwanted particles and dried at room temperature for a further investigation.

2.2. Extracts Preparation

The leaves of Artemisia species (A. monosperma, Judaica, and A. sieberi) were air-dried and grounded using an electronic blender. Then, 5 g of powdered leaves were extracted in 200 mL of methanol (25 mg/mL) and placed in a shaker at room temperature for 48 h. The leaf extract was filtered using Whatman filter papers No. 1. Next, the extract was allowed to dry naturally at room temperature and stored at 4 °C for further use.

2.3. GC-MS Analysis of Leaf Extract

The phytochemical compounds in the leaf extract of Artemisia species were identified using GC-MS (Agilent Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) coupled to a 5973MSD operated in electron impact mode at 70 eV ion source energy. The gas chromatograph (GC) was fitted with a DB-5MS GC column (30 m length, 0.25 mm inner diameter, and 0.25 µm film thickness). The oven temperature was programmed initially at 40 °C, tracked by a 2 min hold. Then, the temperature was raised to 200 °C at a rate of 5 °C min−1. Next, the temperature was raised by 5 °C min−1 to 300 °C and held for another 2 min. The injector and detector temperatures were set to 250 and 275 °C, respectively. The total run time of the sample was 40 min. Helium gas was used as the carrier with a flow rate of 1 mL/min and a split flow of 25 mL/min, with the 70 eV electron ionization energy. The detection of phytochemical compounds in the leaf extract was achieved using the matches percentages and commercial libraries of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (WILEY 9th edition, NIST-08 MS library, Gaithersburg, MD, USA).

2.4. Estimation of Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content (TPC) of the leaf extract was estimated using the Ainsworth [26] method. A volume of 100 µL of the leaf extract was mixed with 100 µL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and 300 µL of sodium carbonate solution (20%). Next, the sample was incubated in the dark for thirty mins at room temperature. The wavelength was recorded at 765 nm using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU, UV-1800). The total phenolic in the samples was determined from the following linear equation (y = 0.0021x + 0.0021 with R2 = 0.9995) based on a standard curve constructed using different concentrations (25–400 µg/mL) of gallic acid. The total phenolic content was expressed as mg/g DW.

2.5. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content (TFC) in plant materials was determined using the method described by Ordonez, A. et al. [27]. A volume of 0.5 mL of methanol extract was mixed with same volume of 2% AlCl3 water solution. After 2 h at 25 °C, the wavelength was recorded at 420 nm. The TFC was determined using a calibration curve which is built from different concentrations (50–0400 µg/mL) of quercetin standard with the following equation (y =  0.0172x + 0.0507 with R2 = 0.995). The estimated TFC has been expressed as quercetin (mg/g DW).

2.6. Determination of Total Tannin Content

The total tannin content (TTC) was calculated from the leaf extract using the method described by Rodrigues et al. [28] with minor changes. A total of 0.1 mL of the extracted samples was added to an Eppendorf tube (2 mL) containing 1.5 mL of Milli-Q water and 0.1 mL of the Folin–Ciocalteu phenol reagent for 8 min. Then, 0.3 mL of 35% sodium carbonate solution was added to the mixture for neutralization. Next, the mixture was shaken well and kept in the dark, at room temperature, for twenty min. The wavelength was recorded at 700 nm. For the determination of the total tannin content in the leaf extract, a calibration curve was constructed using different concentrations of tannic acid standard, and the following equation (Y = 0.0013x+ 0.0052 with R2 = 9937) was used. The calculated total tannin content was expressed in terms of mg/g DW.

2.7. Estimation of Total Terpenoid

The total terpenoid content in crude extract was estimated using the method described by Batool, R. et al. [29] with light modifications. About 400 mg of powder were taken separately and soaked in 10 mL of absolute ethanol for 24 h. Then, it was filtered and the filtrate was extracted with petroleum ether; the ether extract was treated as the total terpenoid. The total terpenoid content was measured using the following formula: the total terpenoid content (%) = [(final weight of the sample − initial weight of the extract)/weight of the sample] × 100.

2.8. DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay

The antioxidant potential of the leaf methanolic extract of Artemisia Species (A. monosperma, A. sieberi, and A. judaica) was evaluated using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (Liyana-Pathirana and Shahidi, 2005). In total, 1 mL of the leaf extract at different concentrations (31.25–500 µg/mL) was mixed with the same volume of DPPH (0.135 mM) dissolved in methanol solvent. The mixture was vortexed well and left in the dark at room temperature for thirty min. The optical density of the extract and control (1 mL DPPH + 1 mL methanol) mixture were recorded at 517 nm. The percentage of the DPPH scavenging activity of the extract or standard was estimated using the following formula: DPPH scavenging activity (%) = [(absorbance of control − absorbance of sample)/ absorbance control] × 100, where; absorbance of control is the absorbance of methanol+ DPPH and absorbance of sample is the absorbance of DPPH radical + extract.

2.9. H2O2 Scavenging Assay

The ability of the Artemisia leaf extract to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging was estimated according to the method explained by Oyedemi S et al. [30]. In total, 0.1 mL of extracted leaf (31.25–500 µg/mL) was mixed with 0.6 mL of 4 mM of hydrogen peroxide solution prepared in 0.1 M of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and it was incubated for 10 min. The reaction mixture was well vortexed. Then, after 10 min of reaction time, the wavelength was recorded at 230 nm. The extract ability to scavenge the hydrogen peroxide was estimated using the following equation: H2O2 radical scavenging activity = [(absorbance of control − absorbance of sample)/absorbance of control] × 100, where: absorbance of control is the absorbance of methanol + H2O2 radicals and absorbance of sample is the absorbance of H2O2 radical + extract.

2.10. Determination of Total Antioxidant Activity

The total antioxidant activities (TAC) were measured according to the method described by Prieto et al. [31]. In brief, 0.15 mL of leaf extract was mixed with 1.5 mL of reagent solution that contained 0.6 M of sulfuric acid, 28 mM of sodium phosphate, and 4 mM of ammonium molybdate. Next the reaction mixture was incubated for 90 min at 95 °C. The optical density of the samples was recorded at 695 nm. The total antioxidant capacity was expressed as milligrams of ascorbic acid equivalence (AAE)/g DW.

2.11. HPLC Instrument

The Agilent liquid chromatographic system (Agilent Technologies 1290 Infinity system (Agilent Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) connected with galaxy (G 4226A) software and the ZOBRAX RX-C18 column (1.8, 4.6 × 150 mm) was used for the separation, identification, and quantification of biomolecules such as artemisinin, quercetin, gallic acid, and tannic acid, with Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich Co., MO, USA) standard for each compound.

2.12. Quantification of Gallic Acid

For the gallic acid quantification from the extract using HPLC, the following conditions were followed; 1% aqueous acetic acid solution and methanol in combination of (40:60) (v/v) used as the mobile phase. The injection volume was 1 µL, the flow rate was 0.700 mL/min, and the temperature of the column was maintained at 25 °C with a 10 min run time. The DAD detector was 274 nm according to the absorption maxima of the analyzed sample. For gallic acid identification, the retention time of the sample was spiked with a standard of gallic acid under similar HPLC conditions, while for the estimation of gallic acid, the following equation (y = 4722.3x − 668.15, R2 = 0.968) of the calibration curve, which was constructed from different concentrations (250–1000 µg/mL of gallic acid), was used.

2.13. Artemisinin Quantification

For the separation, identification, and quantification of artemisinin from the leaf extract of Artemisia species, the mobile phase consisted of 0.1% phosphate buffer and acetonitrile at a ratio of 70:30 (v/v). The flow rate was 1.200 mL/min, and the injected volume of the sample was 1 µL with a 5 min run time. The temperature of the column was adjusted at 24 °C. The chromatogram was acquired at a wavelength of 258 nm according to the absorption maxima of the analyzed samples. Sigma Aldrich artemisinin standard was used for the identification of artemisinin in methanolic extract by comparing their retention time under similar conditions. As well, different concentrations (250, 500, and 1000 µg/mL) of artemisinin were used for plotting the calibration curve with the following equation (y = 10.669x − 0.3727, R2 = 0.994), which was used for the artemisinin estimation from the methanolic extract.

2.14. Quercetin Quantification

The mobile phase used for the separation of quercetin consisted of acetonitrile (A) and methanol (B) (40: 60). The flow rate was 1.00 mL/min, and the injection volume was 1µL with a 10 min run time. The column temperature was maintained at 26 °C. A chromatogram was acquired at a wavelength of 278 nm according to the absorption maxima of the analyzed sample. The quercetin was identified by its retention time spiked with quercetin as a reference standard under similar HPLC conditions. The quercetin in methanolic extract was determined using the linear equation (y = 3245.7x − 61.137, R2 = 0.9738) prepared from the different concentrations ((250, 500, 1000 µg/mL) of quercetin standard.

2.15. Tannic acid Quantification

For tannic acid quantification using HPLC, the following conditions were used: 0.6% acetic acid solution and methanol at a ratio of 20:80 (v/v). The injected volume of the sample was 1 µL, and the flow rate was 1 mL/min (361.74 bar) with a 10 min runt time. The temperature of the column was adjusted to 28 °C. The DAD detector was acquired at 274 nm. The tannic acid in the samples was identified by its retention time spiked with the standard of tannic acid under similar HPLC conditions. The tannic acid in the samples was determined using the following equation (y = 964.32x − 52.124, R2 = 0.9998) of a standard curve constructed using different concentrations (250–1000 µg/mL) of tannic acid.

2.16. Statistical Analysis

The reported data in the tables and figures represent the average of three replicates ± standard deviations (SD). SPSS software, a one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Duncan’s test was used for means of the separation and significant level determination at (p < 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. GC-MS Analysis of Leaf Extract

In general, plants produce phytochemical constituents as protective mechanisms against abiotic and abiotic stress. These bioactive compounds from medicinal plants are very important in drug manufacturing [32,33]. However, the natural sources of bioactive components have still not been fully discovered, and new sources are really needed. Therefore, the efforts and search for new bioactive products in plants with the hope of discovering new products is an on-going process involving academic and pharmaceutical institutions [34]. The species of Artemisia have been playing a vital role in folk as well as contemporary medicine [6]. For the identification of the phytochemical components of Artemisia species, samples were subjected to GC-MS analysis. The identification of secondary metabolites from the methanolic extract was done using the matches percentage and commercial libraries of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Data in Table 1 show the detected phytochemical compounds form the leaf extract of Artemisia species (A. judaica, A. monosperma, and A. sieberi) growing in the northern part of Saudi Arabia, as well as their biological activity. The GC-MS analysis revealed many bioactive compounds related to plant secondary metabolites which possessed anti-allergic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidants, and anti-microbial activity (Table 1 and Figures S1–S4). The variation has been observed in phytochemical compounds among Artemisia species; this might be due to the nature and physio-biochemical response of different species to the environmental conditions. It has been reported that various morphogenetic, genetic, and environmental factors can affect the biosynthesis and accumulation of bioactive compounds [35]. Moreover, the production of plant secondary metabolites (antioxidants) depends on many factors such as the plant, its variety, seasonal variations, and environmental conditions, as stated by [36]. According to GC-MS analysis, the species in this genus have different pools of phytochemical components.

3.2. Phenolic Compounds Estimation

Phenolic compounds are well-known as antioxidants components and have many other important uses due to their benefits for human diet, health, and preventing and curing many diseases [51]. Phenolic compounds such phenols and flavonoids are the largest phytochemical constituents with antioxidant properties from plants [52,53]. In this present work, the total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), total tannin content (TTC), terpenoids, and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in the leaves extract of Artemisia species were estimated (Table 2). The recorded results showed that the methanolic extract of A. sieberi exhibited the highest amount of TPC, followed by A. judaica and A. monosperma, while A. Judaica generated the highest yield of TFC (194.30), tracked by A. monosperma (194.30) and A. sieberi (120.33 mg/g DW), while A. sieberi achieved the highest yield of TTC, followed by A. Judaica and A. monosperma, as well as the terpenoids result. The highest TCA was recorded by A. judaica extract, followed by A. sieberi and A. monosperma (Table 2). Our findings are consistent with several studies that documented the presence of these constituents in the same species grown in different regions of the world [22,54,55,56,57]. In addition, the leaves of Artemisia species contain a higher phenolic acid and flavonoids content, which has health benefits [58]. Furthermore, bioactive compounds such as artemisinin, gallic acid, quercetin, and tannic acid were separated chromatographically and estimated using HPLC with a specific standard for each compound (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 and Table 3). The recoded results demonstrated that A. sieberi possesses a significant amount of these compounds, followed by A. judaica and A. monosperma. Although, these biomolecules (quercetin, tannic acid, and gallic acid) are very important; they act as antioxidants as well as have anticancer and antimicrobial activity [59,60,61]. As detailed in this discussion, we focused on artemisinin separation and estimation as an important compound with a potential as antimalarial activity. For example, it has been stated that the derivatives of artemisinin have been used as a drug in many countries to treat malaria disease, particularly in developing countries [62]. For the separation, identification, and estimation of artemisinin from the leaf extract of Artemisia species, HPLC with a reference standard (artemisinin) was used. Moreover, mobile phases such acetonitrile, HPLC water, glacial acetic acid, and phosphate buffer with different combinations were tested for the best yield of artemisinin; we found that phosphate buffer and acetonitrile at a ratio of 70:30 was the best mobile phase for artemisinin separation from the samples among different tested solvents, with their conditions detailed in the methodology section. For the estimation of artemisinin from leaf extract, a calibration curve was constructed using different concentrations of artemisinin standard by plotting the area of different concentrations of standard solutions (250–1000 µg/mL). It can be seen from Table 3 that the artemisinin content of the samples ranges from 1.9 to 3.01 mg/g, which illustrated that A. sieberi contained the highest amount of artemisinin (3.1 mg/g), while the lowest amount was observed in the leaf extract of A. monosperma. This is a very good yield of artemisinin compared to previous reports on the artemisinin product. For example, the previous reports demonstrated that the level of artemisinin in A. sieberi was 0.2% of the DW reported by Arab H et al. [63].

3.3. Antioxidant Activity Assay

DPPH and H2O2 Estimation

Artemisia species contain high antioxidant activity, which provides considerable protection against may diseases [22,64]. In this present work, the antioxidant activity of the methanolic extract of Artemisia species was determined using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). The obtained results demonstrated that the scavenging ability of DPPH radical was found to be increased with the increasing of the concentration of leaf extract (Figure 5). It was reported that the antioxidant impact of plant products is mainly due to the radical scavenging properties of phenolic components such as polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins, and phenolic terpenes [65]. For instance, in the literature, expanding reports and evidence from laboratory and epidemiological studies have proven that some edible plants and their components with antioxidant activities have substantial protective impacts on human carcinogenesis [21,66]. Moreover, the ability of the leaf extract of Artemisia species to scavenge hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was estimated using Oyedemi S. et al.’s [30] method. Likewise, the same result was recorded related to hydrogen peroxide, which showed that the ability of leaf extract was increased with the increase in the leaf extract concentration (Figure 6). The concentration 500 µg/mL was the best of different Artemisia species, which is scavenged H2O2 significantly compared to other concentrations, as shown in Figure 6. For example, in a defense system against pathogenic agents, reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced at low or moderate concentrations have beneficial impacts, and include physiological roles in cellular system responses to anoxia, as reported by Valko M et al. [20]. Our documented results are consistent with previous studies that reported the presence of these compounds in the same species grown in different regions of the world [22].

3.4. Qualitative Cluster Analysis and Relationship

Based on the generated data of the studied parameters, a heat map with cluster analysis was constructed. The dendrogram shown in Figure 7 demonstrated that all the studied parameters can be divided into different clusters; the dendrogram shows the levels of detected phytochemical components according to the colors from red to blue, expressing the level of the compounds in decreasing order. The red color shows a high concentration of bioactive compounds, while the blue color indicates constituents with a low concentration. The relationship between the bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities was investigated. A positive strong relationship was observed between the major compounds (artemisinin, quercetin, tannic acid, gallic acid, total phenol, total tannin, and total flavonoid content with antioxidants assay (DPPH and TCA)) (Figure 8). Plants rich in antioxidant compounds can reduce the pathogenesis and progression associated with oxidative stress [22,67].

4. Conclusions

Plant bioactive compounds have been shown to possess several biological effects, which provide scientific evidence for the use of herbs in folk medicine in many ancient communities as well as contemporary medicine. The methanolic extract of Artemisia species grown in Saudia Arabia showed many phytochemical compounds, particularly artemisinin, which can be used as a drug for malaria treatment, and the variation in the species was observed. The leaf extract of A. sieberi exhibited a higher yield (3.1) of ART, followed by A. judaica (2.496), and of A. monosperma (2.96 mg/g DW). Our findings confirm the potential use of A. monosperma, A. judaica, and A. sieberi species in traditional medicine and in primary health care. In addition, the obtained findings support the antioxidant properties of Artemisia species that can reduce the effect of oxidative stress. Moreover, we concluded that the species of Artemisia grown in Saudia Arabia have different pools of bioactive compounds. Further, more investigations in vitro and in vivo should be conducted to evaluate the biological activity of these detected compounds.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/metabo13030443/s1, Figure S1: GC-MS chromatogram of leaf extract of Artemisia monosperma, Figure S2: GC-MS chromatogram of leaf extract of Artemisia sieberi, Figure S3: GC-MS chromatogram of leaf extract of Artemisia judaica, Figure S4: Chemical structures of identified phytochemical compounds from leaf extract of different species (A. monosperma, A. judaica, and A. sieberi) of Artemisia.

Author Contributions

A.M.S. and A.A.Q. proposed the work; A.M.S. and A.A.Q. planned and performed the experiments; A.A.Q., A.M.S. and F.A.-Q. contributed to the methodology; A.A.Q. analyzed the data and figures; A.M.S. and A.A.Q. wrote the full manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was financially supported by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2023R73), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article and supplementary.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Das, S. Artemisia annua (Qinghao): A pharmacological review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2012, 3, 4573–4577. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bilia, A.R.; Santomauro, F.; Sacco, C.; Bergonzi, M.C.; Donato, R. Essential oil of Artemisia annua L.: An extraordinary component with numerous antimicrobial properties. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 159819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Nigam, M.; Atanassova, M.; Mishra, A.P.; Pezzani, R.; Devkota, H.P.; Plygun, S.; Salehi, B.; Setzer, W.N.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Bioactive compounds and health benefits of Artemisia species. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1934578X19850354. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bora, K.S.; Sharma, A. The genus Artemisia: A comprehensive review. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Petretto, G.L.; Chessa, M.; Piana, A.; Masia, M.D.; Foddai, M.; Mangano, G.; Culeddu, N.; Afifi, F.U.; Pintore, G. Chemical and biological study on the essential oil of Artemisia caerulescens L. ssp. densiflora (Viv.). Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 27, 1709–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ekiert, H.; Klimek-Szczykutowicz, M.; Rzepiela, A.; Klin, P.; Szopa, A. Artemisia species with high biological values as a potential source of medicinal and cosmetic raw materials. Molecules 2022, 27, 6427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zargari, A. Medicinal Plants; Tehran University of Medical Sciences: Tehran, Iran, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  8. White, N.J. Qinghaosu (artemisinin): The price of success. Science 2008, 320, 330–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahboubi, M. Artemisia sieberi Besser essential oil and treatment of fungal infections. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 89, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Negahban, M.; Moharramipour, S.; Sefidkon, F. Insecticidal activity and chemical composition of Artemisia sieben besser essential oil from Karaj, Iran. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2006, 9, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Taleghani, A.; Emami, S.A.; Tayarani-Najaran, Z. Artemisia: A promising plant for the treatment of cancer. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Irshaid, F.; Mansi, K.; Aburjai, T. Antidiabetic effect of essential oil from Artemisia sieberi growing in Jordan in normal and alloxan induced diabetic rats. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 13, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nahrevanian, H.; Sheykhkanlooye Milan, B.; Kazemi, M.; Hajhosseini, R.; Soleymani Mashhadi, S.; Nahrevanian, S. Antimalarial effects of Iranian flora Artemisia sieberi on Plasmodium berghei in vivo in mice and phytochemistry analysis of its herbal extracts. Malar. Res. Treat. 2012, 2012, 727032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Abdolmaleki, Z.; Arab, H.-A.; Amanpour, S.; Tirgari, F.; Mansouri, K.; Muhammadnejad, S. Assessment of Anticancer properties of Artemisia sieberi and its active substance: An in vitro study. Basic Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 7, 16–23. [Google Scholar]
  15. De Ridder, S.; Van der Kooy, F.; Verpoorte, R. Artemisia annua as a self-reliant treatment for malaria in developing countries. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 120, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ro, D.-K.; Ouellet, M.; Paradise, E.M.; Burd, H.; Eng, D.; Paddon, C.J.; Newman, J.D.; Keasling, J.D. Induction of multiple pleiotropic drug resistance genes in yeast engineered to produce an increased level of anti-malarial drug precursor, artemisinic acid. BMC Biotechnol. 2008, 8, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ma, N.; Zhang, Z.; Liao, F.; Jiang, T.; Tu, Y. The birth of artemisinin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 216, 107658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dellicour, S.; Sevene, E.; McGready, R.; Tinto, H.; Mosha, D.; Manyando, C.; Rulisa, S.; Desai, M.; Ouma, P.; Oneko, M. First-trimester artemisinin derivatives and quinine treatments and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Africa and Asia: A meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Li, Q.; Hickman, M. Toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic (TK/TD) evaluation to determine and predict the neurotoxicity of artemisinins. Toxicology 2011, 279, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Valko, M.; Leibfritz, D.; Moncol, J.; Cronin, M.T.; Mazur, M.; Telser, J. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 39, 44–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tsao, A.S.; Kim, E.S.; Hong, W.K. Chemoprevention of cancer. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2004, 54, 150–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nasr, F.A.; Noman, O.M.; Mothana, R.A.; Alqahtani, A.S.; Al-Mishari, A.A. Cytotoxic, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities and phytochemical analysis of Artemisia judaica and A. sieberi in Saudi Arabia. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2020, 14, 278–284. [Google Scholar]
  23. Guetat, A.; Al-Ghamdi, F.A.; Osman, A.K. The genus Artemisia L. in the northern region of Saudi Arabia: Essential oil variability and antibacterial activities. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 598–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. El-Sayed, M.A.; BaAbbad, R.; Balash, A.; Al-Hemdan, N.A.; Softah, A. The potential anti Helicobacter pylori and antioxidant effects of Artemisia judaica. Funct. Foods Health Dis. 2013, 3, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Moharram, F.A.; Nagy, M.M.; El Dib, R.A.; El-Tantawy, M.M.; El Hossary, G.G.; El-Hosari, D.G. Pharmacological activity and flavonoids constituents of Artemisia judaica L aerial parts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 270, 113777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ainsworth, E.A.; Gillespie, K.M. Estimation of total phenolic content and other oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 875–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ordonez, A.; Gomez, J.; Vattuone, M. Antioxidant activities of Sechium edule (Jacq.) Swartz extracts. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rodrigues, C.I.; Marta, L.; Maia, R.; Miranda, M.; Ribeirinho, M.; Máguas, C. Application of solid-phase extraction to brewed coffee caffeine and organic acid determination by UV/HPLC. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2007, 20, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Batool, R.; Khan, M.R.; Sajid, M.; Ali, S.; Zahra, Z. Estimation of phytochemical constituents and in vitro antioxidant potencies of Brachychiton populneus (Schott & Endl.) R. Br. BMC Chem. 2019, 13, 32. [Google Scholar]
  30. Oyedemi, S.; Bradley, G.; Afolayan, A. In-vitro and-vivo antioxidant activities of aqueous extract of Strychnos henningsii Gilg. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2010, 4, 070–078. [Google Scholar]
  31. Prieto, P.; Pineda, M.; Aguilar, M. Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: Specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 269, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Benyagoub, E.; Nabbou, N.; Dine, A. Antimicrobial Effect of Quercus robur L. Leaves Selective Extracts from the Mezi Mountain of Djeniene Bourezg (West of Algeria). Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2020, 16, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Elsayed, E.A.; El Enshasy, H.; Wadaan, M.A.; Aziz, R. Mushrooms: A potential natural source of anti-inflammatory compounds for medical applications. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 805841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Pagare, S.; Bhatia, M.; Tripathi, N.; Pagare, S.; Bansal, Y. Secondary metabolites of plants and their role: Overview. Curr. Trends Biotechnol. Pharm. 2015, 9, 293–304. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang, L.; Wen, K.-S.; Ruan, X.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Wei, F.; Wang, Q. Response of plant secondary metabolites to environmental factors. Molecules 2018, 23, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Škrovánková, S.; Mišurcová, L.; Machů, L. Antioxidant activity and protecting health effects of common medicinal plants. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2012, 67, 75–139. [Google Scholar]
  37. Choi, D.; Kang, W.; Park, T. Anti-Allergic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Undecane on Mast Cells and Keratinocytes. Molecules 2020, 25, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ziaei, A.; Ramezani, M.; Wright, L.; Paetz, C.; Schneider, B.; Amirghofran, Z. Identification of spathulenol in Salvia mirzayanii and the immunomodulatory effects. Phytother. Res. 2011, 25, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mulyaningsih, S.; Sporer, F.; Reichling, J.; Wink, M. Antibacterial activity of essential oils from Eucalyptus and of selected components against multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hema, R.; Kumaravel, S.; Alagusundaram, K. GC/MS determination of bioactive components of Murraya koenigii. J. Am. Sci. 2011, 7, 80–83. [Google Scholar]
  41. Imtair, A.-G.a.N.; Abu-Serag, N.A.; Alee Shaheed, K.A.; Bahadly, Z.K.A. Analysis of bioactive phytochemical compound of (Cyperus alternifolius L.) By using gas chromatography –mass spectrometry. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 571, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. El-Azab, A.S.; ElTahir, K.E.H. Synthesis and anticonvulsant evaluation of some new 2,3,8-trisubstituted-4(3H)-quinazoline derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ismail, G.A.; Gheda, S.F.; Abo-shady, A.M.; Abdel-karim, O.H. In vitro potential activity of some seaweeds as antioxidants and inhibitors of diabetic enzymes. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 40, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Policegoudra, R.S.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Aradhya, S.M.; Shivaswamy, R.; Singh, L.; Veer, V. Inhibitory effect of Tridax procumbens against human skin pathogens. J. Herb. Med. 2014, 4, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maher, T.; Kabbashi, N.A.; Mirghani, M.E.S.; Alam, M.Z.; Daddiouaissa, D.; Abdulhafiz, F.; Reduan, M.F.; Omran, J.I.; Abdul Razab, M.K.; Mohammed, A. Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Acacia Seyal Gum Using Response Surface Methodology and Their Chemical Content Identification by Raman, FTIR, and GC-TOFMS. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hajji, M.; Jarraya, R.; Lassoued, I.; Masmoudi, O.; Damak, M.; Nasri, M. GC/MS and LC/MS analysis, and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of various solvent extracts from Mirabilis jalapa tubers. Process Biochem. 2010, 45, 1486–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Padma, M.; Ganesan, S.; Jayaseelan, T.; Azhagumadhavan, S.; Sasikala, P.; Senthilkumar, S.; Mani, P. Phytochemical screening and GC–MS analysis of bioactive compounds present in ethanolic leaves extract of Silybum marianum (L). J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2019, 9, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Faridha Begum, I.; Mohankumar, R.; Jeevan, M.; Ramani, K. GC–MS Analysis of Bio-active Molecules Derived from Paracoccus pantotrophus FMR19 and the Antimicrobial Activity Against Bacterial Pathogens and MDROs. Indian J. Microbiol. 2016, 56, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Maghraoui, N.B.; Mederbal, K.; Ibri, K.; Beladid, L.; Samira, N. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from Artemisia herbaalba Asso growing in the north west of Algeria. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2015, 7, 458–462. [Google Scholar]
  50. Peng, W.; Li, D.; Zhang, M.; Ge, S.; Mo, B.; Li, S.; Ohkoshi, M. Characteristics of antibacterial molecular activities in poplar wood extractives. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Tungmunnithum, D.; Thongboonyou, A.; Pholboon, A.; Yangsabai, A. Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds from medicinal plants for pharmaceutical and medical aspects: An overview. Medicines 2018, 5, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Singh, S.K.; Patra, A. Evaluation of phenolic composition, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities of Polygonatum verticillatum (L.). J. Integr. Med. 2018, 16, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, L.; Tian, X.; Wei, W.; Chen, G.; Wu, Z. Fingerprint analysis and quality consistency evaluation of flavonoid compounds for fermented Guava leaf by combining high-performance liquid chromatography time-of-flight electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and chemometric methods. J. Sep. Sci. 2016, 39, 3906–3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Azimian, F.; Roshandel, P. Magnetic field effects on total phenolic content and antioxidant activity in Artemisia sieberi under salinity. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 20, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ranjbar, M.; Naghavi, M.R.; Alizadeh, H. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Artemisia species from Iran: A comparative study using multivariate statistical analysis. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2020, 32, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Allam, H.; Benamar, H.; Ben Mansour, R.; Ksouri, R.; Bennaceur, M. Phenolic composition, antioxidant, and antibacterial activities of Artemisia judaica subsp. sahariensis. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2019, 25, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abbas, Z.K.; Saggu, S.; Rehman, H.; Al Thbiani, A.; Ansari, A.A. Ecological variations and role of heat shock protein in Artemisia judaica L. in response to temperature regimes of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 1268–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Carvalho, I.S.; Cavaco, T.; Brodelius, M. Phenolic composition and antioxidant capacity of six Artemisia species. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 33, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kumar, R.; Vijayalakshmi, S.; Nadanasabapathi, S. Health benefits of quercetin. Def. Life Sci. J. 2017, 2, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Kahkeshani, N.; Farzaei, F.; Fotouhi, M.; Alavi, S.S.; Bahramsoltani, R.; Naseri, R.; Momtaz, S.; Abbasabadi, Z.; Rahimi, R.; Farzaei, M.H. Pharmacological effects of gallic acid in health and diseases: A mechanistic review. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2019, 22, 225. [Google Scholar]
  61. Chen, C.; Yang, H.; Yang, X.; Ma, Q. Tannic acid: A crosslinker leading to versatile functional polymeric networks: A review. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 7689–7711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ranjbar, M.; Naghavi, M.R.; Alizadeh, H.; Soltanloo, H. Expression of artemisinin biosynthesis genes in eight Artemisia species at three developmental stages. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 76, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Arab, H.; Rahbari, S.; Rassouli, A.; Moslemi, M.; Khosravirad, F. Determination of artemisinin in Artemisia sieberi and anticoccidial effects of the plant extract in broiler chickens. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2006, 38, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Irshaid, F.I.; Tarawneh, K.A.; Jacob, J.H.; Alshdefat, A.M. Phenol content, antioxidant capacity and antibacterial activity of methanolic extracts derived from four Jordanian medicinal plants. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 17, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rahman, M.A.A.; Moon, S.-S. Antioxidant polyphenol glycosides from the plant Draba nemorosa. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2007, 28, 827–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Surai, P. Polyphenol compounds in the chicken/animal diet: From the past to the future. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2014, 98, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shabbir, U.; Tyagi, A.; Ham, H.J.; Oh, D.-H. Comprehensive profiling of bioactive compounds in germinated black soybeans via UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS and their anti-Alzheimer’s activity. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metabolites 13 00443 g001 550
Figure 1. HPLC chromatograms: (a) artemisinin standard; (b) leaf extract.
Figure 1. HPLC chromatograms: (a) artemisinin standard; (b) leaf extract.
Metabolites 13 00443 g001
Metabolites 13 00443 g002 550
Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms: (a) gallic acid standard; (b) leaf extract.
Figure 2. HPLC chromatograms: (a) gallic acid standard; (b) leaf extract.
Metabolites 13 00443 g002
Metabolites 13 00443 g003 550
Figure 3. HPLC chromatograms: (a) quercetin standard; (b) leaf extract.
Figure 3. HPLC chromatograms: (a) quercetin standard; (b) leaf extract.
Metabolites 13 00443 g003
Metabolites 13 00443 g004 550
Figure 4. HPLC chromatograms: (a) tannic acid standard; (b) leaf extract.
Figure 4. HPLC chromatograms: (a) tannic acid standard; (b) leaf extract.
Metabolites 13 00443 g004
Metabolites 13 00443 g005 550
Figure 5. DPPH estimation: the reported data are mean values based on three replicates ± SD. Average in the same column with different letters are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. DPPH estimation: the reported data are mean values based on three replicates ± SD. Average in the same column with different letters are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Metabolites 13 00443 g005
Metabolites 13 00443 g006 550
Figure 6. The reported data are average values of three replicates ± standard deviation (SD). a,b,c,d,e means within the same column with different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. The reported data are average values of three replicates ± standard deviation (SD). a,b,c,d,e means within the same column with different superscripts are significantly different at (p < 0.05).
Metabolites 13 00443 g006
Metabolites 13 00443 g007 550
Figure 7. Heat map with cluster of phytochemical constituents from three Artemisia species (A. judaica, A. monosperma, and A. sieberi): showed identified levels of phytochemical components according to the colors from red to blue, demonstrated the level of bioactive constituents in decreasing order.
Figure 7. Heat map with cluster of phytochemical constituents from three Artemisia species (A. judaica, A. monosperma, and A. sieberi): showed identified levels of phytochemical components according to the colors from red to blue, demonstrated the level of bioactive constituents in decreasing order.
Metabolites 13 00443 g007
Metabolites 13 00443 g008 550
Figure 8. Relation between bioactive compounds and antioxidant assay.
Figure 8. Relation between bioactive compounds and antioxidant assay.
Metabolites 13 00443 g008
Table
Table 1. Phytochemical compounds of Artemisia species (A. monosperma, A. judaica, and A. sieberi) detected using GC-MS analysis and their biological activity.
Table 1. Phytochemical compounds of Artemisia species (A. monosperma, A. judaica, and A. sieberi) detected using GC-MS analysis and their biological activity.
S. No.RT (min)Name of CompoundArea %Molecular Weight (g/mol)Structural FormulaBiological Activity
A. monospermaA. judaicaA. sieberi
19.65Undecane16.1961.2329.235156.31C11H24Anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory [37]
220.1026-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, propanoate10.949--212.3285C13H24O2
320.248(-)-Spathulenol24.751--220.356C15H24OAnti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory [38]
420.377Aromadendrene11.297--204.3511C15H24Antibacterial [39]
520.798Allylidenecyclohexane16.392--122.21C9H14
626.312Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester9.352--270.4507C17H34O2Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, decrease blood cholesterol [40]
729.0919,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z, Z, Z)-11.062--292.5C19H32O2Antimicrobial [41]
822.845Lilac alcohol C-1.897-170.25C10H18O2
929.6242-Methylphenanthro[3,4-d] [1,3] oxazol-10-ol-12.230-249.26C16H11NO2
1029.779Etaqualone-4.500-264.322C17H16N2OAnticonvulsant [42]
1138.6641,2-Bis(trimethylsilyl)benzene-0.366-222.47C12H22Si2
1240.092Cyclotrisiloxane, hexamethyl--1.241-222.462C6H18O3Si3Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [43]
1343.095Tetrasiloxane, decamethyl--34.026-310.685C10H30O3Si4Antifungal activity [44]
1443.344Benzo[h]quinoline, 2,4-dimethyl--6.185-207.27C15H13N
1543.9034-Methyl-2-trimethylsilyloxy-acetophenone-20.838-222.35C12H18O2Si
1646.165Silicic acid, diethyl bis(trimethylsilyl) ester-17.484-296.58C10H28O4Si3Antibacterial, antioxidant activity [45]
174.4721-Propanol, 3-bromo---6.173138.991C3H7BrO
187.302Cyclotetrasiloxane, octamethyl---4.952296.6158C8H24O4Si4Antimicrobial activities [46]
199.659Dodecane--34.461170.33C12H26Antibacterial activity [47] and antioxidant [48]
2014.6481,3-Cyclopentadiene, 1,2,5,5-tetramethyl---5.344122.2075C9H14Antimicrobial activity [49]
2114.8711,3-Cyclopentadiene, 5,5-dimethyl-1-ethyl---24.011122.2075C9H14Antimicrobial activity [49]
2222.854Cyclopropane, 1-(1-hydroxy-1-heptyl)-2-methylene-3-pentyl---10.903238.41C16H30O
2337.271Benzene, 2-[(tert-butyldimethylsilyl) oxy]-1-isopropyl-4-methyl---4.922264.48C16H28OSiAntibacterial activity [50]
Table
Table 2. Total phenol, total flavonoids, total tannin content, terpenoids, and TCA of Artemisia species.
Table 2. Total phenol, total flavonoids, total tannin content, terpenoids, and TCA of Artemisia species.
Artemisia SpeciesPhenol
(mg GAE/g DW)		Flavonoid
(mg QE/g DW)		Tannin
(mg TAE/g DW)		Terpenoids (%)TAC (AAE/g DW)
A. judaica175.25 ± 0.88 b24.67 ± 0.07 a69.24 ± 0.55 b11.62 ± 0.71 ab175.91 ± 1.04 a
A. monosperma120.33 ± 1.53 c20.39 ± 0.07 b53.08 ± 0.28 c10.55 ± 0.72 b107.33 ± 2.27 c
A. sieberi194.30 ± 0.84 a18.22 ± 0.14 c78.98 ± 0.11 a13.28 ± 0.41 a262.08 ± 2.08 b
The data are presented the average of phenol, flavonoid, tannin, terpenoids and TCA in leaf extract of Artemisia species ± standard deviation (SD). a,b,c Means within the same column with different superscripts differ significantly at (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Bioactive compounds (ART, quercetin, gallic acid, and tannic acid of Artemisia species (µg/g)).
Table 3. Bioactive compounds (ART, quercetin, gallic acid, and tannic acid of Artemisia species (µg/g)).
Artemisia SpeciesArtemisininQuercetinGallic AcidTannin Acid
A. judaica2496.25 ± 0.88 b15.31 ± 1.17 b64.29 ± 1.43 b162.70 ± 1.43 b
A. monosperma1920.32 ± 1.38 c10.33 ± 1.19 c22.144 ± 0.62 c26.31 ± 1.84 c
A. sieberi3005.33 ± 1.76 a58.38 ± 1.67 a96.79 ± 3.28 a262.09 ±1.42 a
The data are presented the average of artemisinin, quercetin, gallic acid and tannin acid in leaf extract of Artemisia species ± standard deviation (SD). a,b,c Means within the same column with different superscripts differ significantly at (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salih, A.M.; Qahtan, A.A.; Al-Qurainy, F. Phytochemicals Identification and Bioactive Compounds Estimation of Artemisia Species Grown in Saudia Arabia. Metabolites 2023, 13, 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030443

AMA Style

Salih AM, Qahtan AA, Al-Qurainy F. Phytochemicals Identification and Bioactive Compounds Estimation of Artemisia Species Grown in Saudia Arabia. Metabolites. 2023; 13(3):443. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030443

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salih, Abdalrhaman M., Ahmed A. Qahtan, and Fahad Al-Qurainy. 2023. "Phytochemicals Identification and Bioactive Compounds Estimation of Artemisia Species Grown in Saudia Arabia" Metabolites 13, no. 3: 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030443

APA Style

Salih, A. M., Qahtan, A. A., & Al-Qurainy, F. (2023). Phytochemicals Identification and Bioactive Compounds Estimation of Artemisia Species Grown in Saudia Arabia. Metabolites, 13(3), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030443

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop