Next Article in Journal
Revisiting Quantum Field Theory in Rindler Spacetime with Superselection Rules
Previous Article in Journal
Lifetime of Long-Lived Sunspot Groups
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characteristics of Powerful Radio Galaxies

by
Chandra B. Singh
1,*,
Michael Williams
2,
David Garofalo
2,*,
Luis Rojas Castillo
2,
Landon Taylor
2 and
Eddie Harmon
2
1
South-Western Institute for Astronomy Research (SWIFAR), Yunnan University, University Town, Chenggong, Kunming 650500, China
2
Department of Physics, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA 30060, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Universe 2024, 10(8), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10080319
Submission received: 12 June 2024 / Revised: 25 July 2024 / Accepted: 5 August 2024 / Published: 8 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Compact Objects)

Abstract

:
Mature radio galaxies such as M87 belong to a specific subclass of active galaxies (AGN) whose evolution in time endows them with five distinguishing characteristics, including (1) low excitation emission, (2) low star formation rates, (3) high bulge stellar-velocity dispersion, (4) bright stellar nuclei, and (5) weak or nonexistent merger signatures. We show how to understand these seemingly disparate characteristics as originating from the time evolution of powerful radio quasars and describe a new model prediction that tilted accretion disks in AGN are expected to occur in bright quasars but not in other subclasses of AGN. The picture we present should be understood as the most compelling evidence for counter-rotation as a key element in feedback from accreting black holes.

1. Introduction

Understanding feeding and feedback from black holes has been a cornerstone of extragalactic astronomy since radio quasars were detected and interpreted in the 1960s [1,2,3,4,5]. Models for accreting black holes date back to the 1970s [6,7,8], with those for AGN coming into their own by the 1990s [9,10,11]. Despite some success, the most widely accepted paradigm for astrophysical black holes has yet to explain a number of observations: AGN with jets are the minority; powerful jetted AGN live earlier, while bright, jetless AGN peak later; jetted AGN have more massive black holes; and merger signatures in jetted/non-jetted AGN do not unambiguously point to a trigger. FRI radio galaxies have the most massive black holes while FRII radio galaxies have less massive ones. FRII high-excitation radio galaxies (HERG) are at higher redshift, FRII low-excitation radio galaxies (LERG) are at intermediate redshift, and FRI LERG are at lower redshift. The key missing element that allows a simultaneous understanding of all the above is counter-rotation between accretion disks and black holes [12]. With this idea, we have not only addressed the above issues but have recently been able to explain the details of the M-σ relations between black hole mass and stellar velocity dispersion [13] and the lifetimes of radio quasar jets. This model is compatible with the jet/wind scenario discussed in [14], as explained in [15]. Here, we connect the relation among star formation rate, stellar velocity dispersion, core stellar brightness, excitation level, and merger signatures. In Section 2.1, we describe the data, and in Section 2.2, we describe the theory that explains it. In Section 3, we conclude.

2. Discussion

2.1. Observations

In this section, we begin by deriving a proxy for the average—or overall—behavior of star formation rates as a function of galaxy-bulge stellar velocity dispersion at late times in the universe (i.e., past the peak of quasars at a redshift of 2). To accomplish this, we extract the densities of star-forming galaxies (Table 1) and of quiescent galaxies (Table 2) from the velocity dispersion functions (VDF) of [16], which are given in terms of logarithms. If you take the antilogarithms of the density values in Table 1 and Table 2, i.e., 10log φ where log φ is given in [16], you will reproduce the VDF of [16]. With these densities, we construct the ratio of star-forming galaxy density to quiescent galaxy density (Table 3) and consider it as a proxy for the average rate of star formation between redshift of 0.6 and 1. We show the anti-correlation between Table 3 data and stellar velocity dispersion in Figure 1. This is strong evidence that galaxies with high stellar velocity dispersions tend to have low star formation rates [17,18].
In addition to the inverse relation between star formation rate and stellar velocity dispersion, the evidence associates low star formation rates with the jetted AGN subgroup and higher star formation rates with the non-jetted AGN subgroup. [19] evaluated the median star formation rate for MaNGA, with both jetted and non-jetted AGN, finding the non-jetted AGN to have a median star formation rate of 0.631 solar masses per year while the jetted AGN have a median star formation rate of 0.025. This is a factor of 25 difference in the star formation rate between the two AGN subclasses for 0.01 < z < 0.15. The star formation rates for the radio quiet quasars of [20] are between 20 and 300 solar masses/year. [21] found their sample of radio quiet quasars to have an average star formation rate of 30 solar masses/year for 160 radio-quiet quasars.
In addition to star formation and velocity dispersion, we show evidence for a larger stellar component in the nucleus of powerful, low-excitation FRI radio galaxies (i.e., exhibiting weak emission lines) as compared to radio-quiet quasars. We look at the data from [22] and pick out the elliptical galaxies in their sample with the largest Sersic indices and with jets and report them in Table 4. The average Sersic index is n = 9.7. The average Sersic index for the disk galaxies of [22] is 3.3. n, which appears in the intensity profile as a function of distance r as (see [23] for details)
I(r) = Ieexp {−bn[(r/re)1/n − 1]}.
NGC 1399, the dominant galaxy in the Fornax Cluster, has a black hole just under a billion solar masses, an FRI jet, an estimated Bondi accretion rate of 9.1 × 10−3 solar masses/year [24], and a low rate of star formation [25]. NGC 4261 is an elliptical galaxy in the Virgo Cluster with a black hole about 1.67 billion solar masses [23], a visible two-sided FRI jet [26,27], a low star formation rate [28], a stellar velocity dispersion of 297 km/s [24], and a low excitation nucleus [29], with an estimated Bondi accretion rate of 6 × 10−2 solar masses per year [24]. NGC 4374 is an elliptical galaxy in the Virgo Cluster with a black hole of 0.93 billion solar masses [24], a low rate of star formation [28,30], an estimated Bondi accretion rate of 2.4 × 10−3 solar masses per year [24], and a stellar velocity dispersion of 278 km/s [24]. NGC 4486 has a low star formation rate [26], an estimated Bondi accretion rate of 0.13 solar masses per year [24], and a stellar velocity dispersion of 323 km/s [24]. We do not discuss NGC 6251 with a Sersic index of 11.8 because it appears to be a giant radio galaxy, which is modeled in our paradigm as a system that experiences a second bout of counter-rotation. It also preserves its nuclear stellar component but requires further discussion beyond this work. Radio-quiet quasars, by comparison, appear to have higher star formation rates, lower velocity dispersions, higher excitation signatures, and dimmer nuclear stellar cores. The star formation rate of the radio-quiet quasar SBS 1520 + 530, for example, is measured to be 190 solar masses/year [20], while its Sersic index is only 2.7 [31]. Finally, the merger signatures in FRI radio galaxies are fewer than in other AGN [32], and even more intriguing is the finding that the signatures of mergers decrease with increasing galactic stellar velocity dispersion [33]. We place these objects and their properties in Table 4. In the next section, we describe the theoretical context that allows for an understanding of how these five characteristics come about in this particular subclass of AGN.

2.2. Theory

In this section, we use a simple model schematic to show how the formation and evolution of radio quasars strings together the five characteristics described in the previous section, namely,
  • bright nuclear stellar cores
  • low excitation accretion
  • high stellar velocity dispersion
  • low star formation rates
  • weak merger signatures
a. 
bright nuclear stellar cores
Our theoretical picture is anchored to the idea of counter-rotation between a spinning black hole and an accretion disk, a configuration that results from a merger of two galaxies. Each galaxy provides a supermassive black hole that eventually coalesces. In order for this to occur, the black hole binary must rid itself of its binary angular momentum such that the black holes are well within a pc of each other, where gravitational waves can complete the merger. Because a corotating disk struggles to bring the binary within 1 pc [34], nearby stars are needed to further eliminate the binary angular momentum, and this leads to a depleted stellar core. If the disk is counter-rotating with respect to the binary black hole angular momentum, on the other hand, the accretion disk is effective in extracting the binary angular momentum [35], and the black holes can merge without depleting their stellar cores. This is illustrated in Figure 2. As we will show, the active galaxies triggered by counter-rotating accretion will tend to become the red-and-dead FRI radio galaxies which are therefore prescribed by theory to have bright nuclear cores.
b. 
low excitation accretion
The counter-rotating accretion configuration is associated with an FRII jet [12], whose effect is to create a funnel-like region through the ISM by pushing the cold gas away and enhancing the density. The higher-density region is shown in purple, while the less-dense funnel region is in grey in Figure 3. The energy deposited in the hotspots circles back to affect the accretion process by feeding heated gas and altering the state of accretion to an advection-dominated accretion flow (ADAF). Such a transition requires no less than 5 million years and can occur during counter-rotation, but it dominates during the longest-lasting phase of such a radio galaxy, which follows the transition through zero black-hole spin [12]. This is captured by the change in color for the accretion disk from yellow in Figure 3 to dirty blue in Figure 4.
c. 
High stellar velocity dispersion
While the black hole spin has a non-zero value, the Bardeen–Petterson effect [36] applies, but it disappears when the black hole spin is zero and a new plane of accretion is formed that is determined by the angular momentum of the incoming gas [37] and which is responsible for the high stellar velocity dispersion as we now describe. The Bardeen–Petterson effect results from Lens–Thirring precession [38], a general relativistic effect that ultimately forces the disk’s angular momentum to be aligned or anti-aligned with the angular momentum of the black hole. While the Bardeen–Petterson effect is believed to operate continuously in X-ray binaries, where the donor star feeds the compact object with angular momentum that is misaligned with that of the compact object, such an effect operates in a restrictive manner in the subset of AGN that lead to tilted jets, as we now show. The timescale for alignment is given by [39] as
T a l i g n = 3 a M 2 R G R / R B P 1 / 2 d M / d t
where a is the dimensionless black hole spin, M is the black hole mass, RGR is the gravitational radius, and RBP is the Bardeen–Petterson radius given as a function of black hole spin as
RBP = Aa2/3RGR
where A is constant, and dM/dt is the accretion rate onto the black hole. While this expression was derived for corotation, it has been shown that the timescale for counter-rotation is the same [40,41,42]. This expression tends to zero as the black hole spin approaches zero. According to our model prescription ([12] and Figure 4), however, the accretion rate drops as the transition through zero spin occurs, which has the effect of increasing the alignment timescale. We model the timescale for an accreting black hole that approaches the boundary between thin disk and ADAF prior to reaching zero spin (Figure 5). As the black hole approaches zero spin in the counter-rotating regime, it initially experiences a jump in the alignment timescale due to the decrease in accretion rate (Figure 6), which is a factor of about 25 times larger than the alignment timescale of the post-merger black hole that accretes at the Eddington rate. A counter-rotating black hole spins down to zero spin from an initially maximally spinning black hole in about 8 × 106 years if it accretes at the Eddington limit. Because the alignment timescale is longer than this [39], counter-rotating black holes tend to have inner disks that are anti-aligned with the black hole angular momentum and outer disks beyond the Bardeen–Petterson radius that are tilted. This will last until the black hole is close to zero black hole spin. Once zero spin is reached, the Bardeen–Petterson effect disappears, the accretion disk forms in the plane determined by the angular momentum of the incoming gas from the greater galaxy, and the alignment timescale becomes irrelevant beyond that time. We therefore only show the alignment timescale as a function of spin during the counter-rotating regime. This bump in the alignment time is larger for the most powerful radio quasars, whose feedback effect rapidly transitions their thin disks into ADAFs. We therefore expect this effect to dominate in denser environments. Our model thus prescribes that FRII radio quasars/radio galaxies possess Bardeen–Petterson transition radii and that FRI radio galaxies do not. In other words, only in post-mergers will the accreting black holes have this feature. While this applies to radio-quiet quasars as well, we are here concerned with the jetted AGN subclass. Because radio quasars are modeled as counter-rotating black holes, they are relatively shorter-lived, at least compared to FRI radio galaxies. The observational consequences of this prediction remain unexplored.
When the black hole spins up again beyond the zero black hole spin in corotation and a jet is again formed, it will be tilted with respect to the earlier FRII jet phase, as shown in Figure 4. This has a direct impact on the stars in the bulge, which are pushed around and acquire an enhancement in their velocity dispersion (shown by red arrows). Note that the jet is drawn thicker as compared to the jet shown in Figure 3. This is due to the fact that the jet in Figure 4 enters a denser region as compared to the FRII jet of Figure 3. Here we see an explanation for the different jet morphology. The FRI jet morphology is due to both an environmental effect (greater density) and an engine-based effect (its tilt).
d. 
low star formation rates
The absence of the Bardeen–Petterson effect and the tilted jet that develops in corotation will make it difficult to drill through the denser medium (Figure 4), and this leads to the FRI morphology, which deposits its energy in the ISM, heating the gas and impeding star formation. This effect on star formation is referred to as the Roy Conjecture [43]. As the star formation rate drops, the galaxy experiences increasingly fewer new stars and an aging of the existing stars, which gives the galaxy the character of an old red-and-dead elliptical galaxy. The old stars are drawn in red in Figure 4, and the hot halo is shown in green.
e. 
weak merger signatures
A powerful FRII jet that rapidly transitions its accretion disk to an ADAF in a few million years will accrete at 10−2 the Eddington limit, which means that it will spin its black hole down to zero spin in about 5 × 108 years. In order to become an FRI radio galaxy, the black hole spin needs to reach a spin value of about 0.2, which, at the Eddington limit, takes about 20 million years. The accretion rate is at 10−2 the Eddington limit, however, and continues to decrease over this time period, so the FRI jet comes into play no sooner than about 2 × 109 years after zero spin and lives as long as there is accretion fuel. Because of the low accretion rates at this late phase, FRI radio galaxies live billions of years in such states. Because merger signatures last about 100 million years, it is clear that for mature FRI radio galaxies like M87, no merger signatures are expected to survive. In general, the longer the FRI radio galaxy lives, the weaker the merger signatures become. Because theory prescribes jet affecting stellar velocity dispersion, the longer the FRI jet exists, the larger the predicted stellar velocity dispersions. Therefore, the model makes the interesting prediction of an inverse relation between stellar velocity dispersion and merger signatures. If galactic velocity dispersion increases with time, an anti-correlation is generated between merger signatures and galactic stellar velocity dispersion as is found observationally [33].

3. Conclusions

The fact that star formation is either enhanced [44,45] or suppressed [46,47,48,49,50] due to AGN feedback has been met with mixed evidence. Our paradigm for black hole feedback posits the enhancement of star formation for FRII radio galaxies associated with counter-rotating black holes. Jets likely tilt with respect to the radio quasar phase in the transition through zero spin to produce corotation, and this allows the jet energy to more directly couple to the interstellar medium, heating it and suppressing star formation. This tilt also affects stellar dispersions in the galactic bulge. Hence, in our paradigm, star formation suppression and the enhancement of stellar velocity dispersion go together. It is therefore of primary relevance to explore their connection over cosmic time. [16] have provided the data for this up to a redshift of 1. Galaxies with higher stellar dispersion values are strongly associated with lower star formation rates. Because the radio galaxies with the highest stellar dispersion values and lowest star formation rates are prescribed to be the end state of what originate as powerful radio quasars, a prediction is identified from the model that at high redshift, both suppressed star formation rates and stellar velocity dispersions should exhibit less-extreme values. While star formation rates should on average be higher than at lower redshift, the opposite would be true for stellar dispersions. Because this anti-correlation is instantiated as a result of original counter-rotation, black holes that are not triggered into counter-rotation will not experience it. Because counter-rotation is more efficient in merging black hole binaries, the AGN triggered in counter-rotation should experience non-depleted stellar cores. We have provided evidence of such correlations. In addition, both the low excitation character of a subset of radio galaxies and the weak merger signatures are a natural consequence of the late time evolution of these powerful AGNs. Finally, we have identified a prediction concerning the existence of tilted disks in a subset of AGN, whose observational features remain to be explored. Along with recent FRII jet lifetime estimates [51], the evidence presented here constitutes strong support for counter-rotating black holes as a key element in our understanding of black hole feedback.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B.S. and D.G.; methodology, D.G., L.R.C., L.T. and E.H.; software, M.W., L.R.C., L.T. and E.H.; formal analysis, M.W. and D.G.; writing—original draft, C.B.S. and D.G.; writing—review and editing, C.B.S. and D.G.; supervision, D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 12073021.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Date sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hazard, C.; Mackey, M.B.; Shimmins, A.J. Investigation of the Radio Source 3C 273 by the Method of Lunar Occultations. Nature 1963, 197, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schmidt, M. 3C 273: A Star-Like Object with Large Red-Shift. Nature 1963, 197, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oke, J.B. Absolute Energy Distribution in the Optical Spectrum of 3C 273. Nature 1963, 197, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Greenstein, J.L.; Matthews, T. Red-Shift of the Unusual Radio Source: 3 C 48. Nature 1963, 197, 1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Padovani, P.; Alexander, D.M.; Assef, R.J.; De Marco, B.; Giommi, P.; Hickox, R.C.; Richards, G.T.; Smolčić, V.; Hatziminaoglou, E.; Mainieri, V. Active galactic nuclei: What’s in a name? Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 2017, 25, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shakura, N.I.; Sunyaev, R.A. Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. Astron. Astrophys. 1973, 24, 337. [Google Scholar]
  7. Blandford, R.D.; Znajek, R.L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1977, 179, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Blandford, R.D.; Payne, D.G. Hydromagnetic flows from accretion disks and the production of radio jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1982, 199, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Urry, C.M.; Padovani, P. Unified schemes for radio-loud active galactic nuclei. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1995, 107, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wilson, A.S.; Colbert, E.J.M. The difference between radio-loud and radio-quiet active galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1995, 438, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sikora, M.; Stawarz, L.; Lasota, J.-P. Radio Loudness of Active Galactic Nuclei: Observational Facts and Theoretical Implications. Astrophys. J. 2007, 658, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Garofalo, D.; Evans, D.A.; Sambruna, R.M. The evolution of radio-loud active galactic nuclei as a function of black hole spin. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010, 406, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ferrarese, L.; Merritt, D. A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2000, 539, L9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mehdipour, M.; Costantini, E. Relation between winds and jets in radio-loud AGN. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 625, A25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Garofalo, D. Resolving the Radio-loud/Radio-quiet Dichotomy without Thick Disks. Astrophys. J. 2019, 876, L20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Taylor, L.; Bezanson, R.; van der Wel, A.; Pearl, A.; Bell, E.F.; D’Eugenio, F.; Franx, M.; Maseda, M.V.; Muzzin, A.; Sobral, D.; et al. The Velocity Dispersion Function for Massive Quiescent and Star-forming Galaxies at 0.6 < z ≤ 1.0. Astrophys. J. 2022, 939, 90. [Google Scholar]
  17. Catalán-Torrecilla, C.; De Paz, A.G.; Castillo-Morales, A.; Méndez-Abreu, J.; Falcón-Barroso, J.; Bekeraite, S.; Costantin, L.; de Lorenzo-Cáceres, A.; Florido, E.; García-Benito, R.; et al. Star Formation in the Local Universe from the CALIFA Sample. II. Activation and Quenching Mechanisms in Bulges, Bars, and Disks. Astrophys. J. 2017, 848, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Falcón-Barroso, J.; Lyubenova, M.; Van De Ven, G.; Mendez-Abreu, J.; Aguerri, J.A.L.; García-Lorenzo, B.; Bekeraité, S.; Sánchez, S.F.; Husemann, B.; García-Benito, R.; et al. Stellar kinematics across the Hubble sequence in the CALIFA survey: General properties and aperture corrections. Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 597, A48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Comerford, J.; Negus, J.; Müller-Sánchez, F.; Eracleous, M.; Wylezalek, D.; Storchi-Bergmann, T.; Greene, J.E.; Barrows, R.S.; Nevin, R.; Roy, N.; et al. A catalog of 406 AGNs in manga: A connection between radio-mode AGNs and star formation quenching. Astrophys. J. 2020, 901, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stacey, H.R.; McKean, J.P.; Jackson, N.J.; Best, P.N.; Rivera, G.C.; Callingham, J.R.; Duncan, K.L.; Gürkan, G.; Hardcastle, M.J.; Iacobelli, M.; et al. LoTSS/HETDEX: Disentangling star formation and AGN activity in gravitationally lensed radio-quiet quasars. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 622, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zakamska, N.; Lampayan, K.; Petric, A.; Dicken, D.; Greene, J.E.; Heckman, T.M.; Hickox, R.C.; Ho, L.C.; Krolik, J.H.; Nesvadba, N.P.H.; et al. Star formation in quasar hosts and the origin of radio emission in radio-quiet quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 455, 4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Graham, A.W.; Driver, S.P. A log-quadratic relation for predicting supermassive black hole masses from the host bulge Sérsic index. Astrophys. J. 2007, 655, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Graham, A.W.; Driver, S.P. A concise reference to (projected) sérsic R1/n quantities, including concentration, profile slopes, petrosian indices, and kron magnitudes. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 2005, 22, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Plsek, T.; Werner, N.; Grossova, R.; Topinka, M.; Simionescu, A.; Allen, S.W. The relation between accretion rate and jet power in early-type galaxies with thermally unstable hot atmospheres. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 517, 3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Di Matteo, T.; Quataert, E.; Allen, S.W.; Narayan, R.; Fabian, A.C. Low radiative efficiency accretion in the nuclei of elliptical galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2000, 311, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Birkinshaw, M.; Davies, R.L. The orientations of the rotation axes of radio galaxies. I-Radio morphologies of bright elliptical galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1985, 291, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wehrle, A.E.; Jones, D.L.; Meier, D.L.; Piner, B.G. The radio jets and accretion disk in NGC 4261. New Astron. Rev. 2002, 46, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Amblard, A.; Riguccini, L.; Temi, P.; Im, S.; Fanelli, M.; Serra, P. Star formation bimodality in early-type galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2014, 783, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zezas, A.; Birkinshaw, M.; Worrall, D.M.; Peters, A.; Fabbiano, G. Chandra observations of NGC 4261 (3C 270): Revealing the jet and hidden active galactic nucleus in a Type 2 LINER. Astrophys. J. 2005, 627, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ford, A.; Bregman, J.N. Detection of Ongoing, Low-Level Star Formation in Nearby Ellipticals. In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #219; American Astronomical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; Volume 219. [Google Scholar]
  31. Auger, M.W.; Fassnacht, C.D.; Wong, K.C.; Thompson, D.; Matthews, K.; Soifer, B.T. Lens Galaxy Properties of SBS 1520+ 530: Insights from Keck Spectroscopy and AO Imaging. Astrophys. J. 2008, 673, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gordon, Y.A.; Pimbblet, K.A.; Kaviraj, S.; Owers, M.S.; O’Dea, C.P.; Walmsley, M.; Baum, S.A.; Crossett, J.P.; Fraser-McKelvie, A.; Lintott, C.J.; et al. The effect of minor and major mergers on the evolution of low-excitation radio galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2019, 878, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pearson, W.J.; Santos, D.J.D.; Goto, T.; Huang, T.-C.; Kim, S.J.; Matsuhara, H.; Pollo, A.; Ho, S.C.-C.; Hwang, H.S.; Małek, K.; et al. Effects of galaxy environment on merger fraction. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.11615v1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Milosavljevi’c, M.; Merritt, D. Formation of galactic nuclei. Astrophys. J. 2001, 563, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nixon, C.J.; Cossins, P.J.; King, A.R.; Pringle, J.E. Retrograde accretion and merging supermassive black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 412, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bardeen, J.M.; Petterson, J.A. The Lense-Thirring effect and accretion disks around Kerr black holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1975, 195, L65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Garofalo, D.; Joshi, R.; Yang, X.; Singh, C.B.; North, M.; Hopkins, M. A unified framework for X-shaped radio galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2020, 889, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lense, J.R.; Thirring, H. über den Einflu? der Eigenro- tation der Zentralk?rper auf die Bewegung der Planeten und Monde nach der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie. Phys. Z. 1918, 19, 156. [Google Scholar]
  39. Fragile, P.C.; Mathews, G.J.; Wilson, J.R. Bardeen-Petterson effect and quasi-periodic oscillations in x-ray binaries. Astrophys. J. 2001, 553, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. King, A.R.; Lubow, S.H.; Ogilvie, G.I.; Pringle, J.E. Aligning spinning black holes and accretion discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2005, 363, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lodato, G.; Pringle, J.E. The evolution of misaligned accretion discs and spinning black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2006, 368, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Martin, R.G.; Pringle, J.E.; Tout, C.A. Alignment and precession of a black hole with a warped accretion disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2007, 381, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garofalo, D.; Moravec, E.; Macconi, D.; Singh, C.B. Is jet re-orientation the elusive trigger for star formation suppression in radio galaxies? Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2022, 134, 114101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kalfountzou, E.; Stevens, J.A.; Jarvis, M.J.; Hardcastle, M.J.; Smith, D.J.B.; Bourne, N.; Dunne, L.; Ibar, E.; Eales, S.; Ivison, R.J.; et al. Herschel-ATLAS: Far-infrared properties of radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 442, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zinn, P.-C.; Middelberg, E.; Norris, R.P.; Dettmar, R.-J. Active galactic nucleus feedback works both ways. Astrophys. J. 2013, 774, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nesvadba, N.P.H.; Boulanger, F.; Salomé, P.; Guillard, P.; Lehnert, M.D.; Ogle, P.; Appleton, P.; Falgarone, E.; Forets, G.P.D. Energetics of the molecular gas in the H2 luminous radio galaxy 3C 326: Evidence for negative AGN feedback. Astron. Astrophys. 2010, 521, A65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nesvadba, N.P.H.; Lehnert, M.D.; Eisenhauer, F.; Gilbert, A.; Tecza, M.; Abuter, R. Extreme Gas Kinematics in the z = 2.2 Powerful Radio Galaxy MRC 1138–262: Evidence for Efficient Active Galactic Nucleus Feedback in the Early Universe? Astrophys. J. 2006, 650, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pawlik, A.H.; Schaye, J. Photoheating and supernova feedback amplify each other’s effect on the cosmic star formation rate. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 396, L46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Morganti, R. The many faces of the gas in Centaurus A (NGC 5128). Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 2010, 27, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Breda, I.; Papaderos, P.; Gomes, J.M.; Vílchez, J.M.; Ziegler, B.L.; Hirschmann, M.; Cardoso, L.S.M.; Lagos, P.; Buitrago, F. Stellar age gradients and inside-out star formation quenching in galaxy bulges. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 635, A177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Garofalo, D. Counter-rotating black holes from FRII lifetimes. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 2023, 10, 1123209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. z = 0.6–1.0 ratio of star-forming galaxy density to quiescent galaxy density constructed from the velocity dispersion functions in [16] versus stellar velocity dispersion as a proxy for the rate of star formation.
Figure 1. z = 0.6–1.0 ratio of star-forming galaxy density to quiescent galaxy density constructed from the velocity dispersion functions in [16] versus stellar velocity dispersion as a proxy for the rate of star formation.
Universe 10 00319 g001
Figure 2. (Left)—Merging black holes stuck at a 1 pc separation [34]. Stars are needed to extract the angular momentum of the black hole binary because its angular momentum is in the same direction as that of the incoming gas. Gas rotation indicated by thick blue arrow. Binary rotation indicated by thin black arrow. (Right)—Stars not needed to extract the angular momentum of the black hole binary. The counter-rotating disk is efficient in coalescing the black holes [35], which are shown within 1 pc and heading toward coalescence.
Figure 2. (Left)—Merging black holes stuck at a 1 pc separation [34]. Stars are needed to extract the angular momentum of the black hole binary because its angular momentum is in the same direction as that of the incoming gas. Gas rotation indicated by thick blue arrow. Binary rotation indicated by thin black arrow. (Right)—Stars not needed to extract the angular momentum of the black hole binary. The counter-rotating disk is efficient in coalescing the black holes [35], which are shown within 1 pc and heading toward coalescence.
Universe 10 00319 g002
Figure 3. A counter-rotating accretion disk (yellow) around a spinning black hole produces a jet (red) that pushes cold gas away from a funnel-like central region, leading to an enhancement in the star formation (blue).
Figure 3. A counter-rotating accretion disk (yellow) around a spinning black hole produces a jet (red) that pushes cold gas away from a funnel-like central region, leading to an enhancement in the star formation (blue).
Universe 10 00319 g003
Figure 4. In the transition through zero black-hole spin, a new plane of accretion is formed, and once the spin is large enough, a new jet emerges, which impinges on a higher-density region and is entrained, heating the gas, shutting down star formation, and enhancing stellar velocity dispersion (red arrows). The halo becomes suffused in hot gas (green), the star formation drops, and the stars become old (red). Note the transition from a radiatively efficient disk (bright yellow) to an ADAF (dull blue). This is a low-excitation radio galaxy. The gas is heated by the jet and, as a result, is suffused in a hot X-ray halo that cannot form stars.
Figure 4. In the transition through zero black-hole spin, a new plane of accretion is formed, and once the spin is large enough, a new jet emerges, which impinges on a higher-density region and is entrained, heating the gas, shutting down star formation, and enhancing stellar velocity dispersion (red arrows). The halo becomes suffused in hot gas (green), the star formation drops, and the stars become old (red). Note the transition from a radiatively efficient disk (bright yellow) to an ADAF (dull blue). This is a low-excitation radio galaxy. The gas is heated by the jet and, as a result, is suffused in a hot X-ray halo that cannot form stars.
Universe 10 00319 g004
Figure 5. Accretion rate onto the black hole in units of the Eddington accretion rate as a function of black hole spin. Evolution in time is toward zero black hole spin. This is the characteristic behavior for an AGN triggered into a radio quasar, whose disk evolves rapidly into an ADAF from a thin disk. The thin disk/ADAF boundary is located at 0.01 the Eddington accretion rate.
Figure 5. Accretion rate onto the black hole in units of the Eddington accretion rate as a function of black hole spin. Evolution in time is toward zero black hole spin. This is the characteristic behavior for an AGN triggered into a radio quasar, whose disk evolves rapidly into an ADAF from a thin disk. The thin disk/ADAF boundary is located at 0.01 the Eddington accretion rate.
Universe 10 00319 g005
Figure 6. Disk alignment timescale for a radio galaxy whose accretion rate reaches the thin-disk/ADAF boundary at a counter-rotating black hole spin of 0.1. The time is scaled to the initial timescale associated with an accretion rate that is at the Eddington limit.
Figure 6. Disk alignment timescale for a radio galaxy whose accretion rate reaches the thin-disk/ADAF boundary at a counter-rotating black hole spin of 0.1. The time is scaled to the initial timescale associated with an accretion rate that is at the Eddington limit.
Universe 10 00319 g006
Table 1. Density of star-forming galaxies from the velocity dispersion function of [16].
Table 1. Density of star-forming galaxies from the velocity dispersion function of [16].
log σz = 0.6–1Z = 0.6–0.7z = 0.7–0.8z = 0.8–0.9z = 0.9–1
2.050.0180.0120.0170.01950.028
2.150.0110.0070.0110.01230.016
2.250.0040.00260.0020.0070.007
2.350.00080.000470.00060.00070.001
2.450.00010.00018.9125E-050.000130.0002
Table 2. Density of quiescent galaxies from the velocity dispersion function of [16].
Table 2. Density of quiescent galaxies from the velocity dispersion function of [16].
log σz = 0.6–1z = 0.6–0.7z = 0.7–0.8z = 0.8–0.9z = 0.9–1
2.040.0050.0050.0090.005
2.150.0060.00440.0060.0070.007
2.250.00540.00490.0050.0070.003
2.350.0030.00250.0020.0030.003
2.450.00080.000710.00050.00070.001
Table 3. Ratio of data in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 3. Ratio of data in Table 1 and Table 2.
z = 0.6–1z = 0.6–0.7z = 0.7–0.8z = 0.8–0.9z = 0.9–1
3.392.341.84.27
2.01.591.91.822.1
0.780.520.4912.04
0.3020.190.340.280.42
0.180.160.190.180.18
Table 4. 1. Object, 2. black hole mass in solar masses, 3. jet type, 4. accretion rate in terms of the Eddington limit, 5. star formation in terms of solar masses per year, 6. stellar velocity dispersion in km/s, and 7. sersic index.
Table 4. 1. Object, 2. black hole mass in solar masses, 3. jet type, 4. accretion rate in terms of the Eddington limit, 5. star formation in terms of solar masses per year, 6. stellar velocity dispersion in km/s, and 7. sersic index.
ObjectBlack Hole MassJet TypeAccretion RateSFRσn
NGC 13995 × 108 FRI9.1 × 10−3low 16.8
NGC 42611.67 billionFRI6 × 10−2low2977.3
NGC 43740.93 billionFRI2.4 × 10−3low2785.6
NGC 44866.5 billionFRI0.13low3236.86
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, C.B.; Williams, M.; Garofalo, D.; Rojas Castillo, L.; Taylor, L.; Harmon, E. Characteristics of Powerful Radio Galaxies. Universe 2024, 10, 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10080319

AMA Style

Singh CB, Williams M, Garofalo D, Rojas Castillo L, Taylor L, Harmon E. Characteristics of Powerful Radio Galaxies. Universe. 2024; 10(8):319. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10080319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Chandra B., Michael Williams, David Garofalo, Luis Rojas Castillo, Landon Taylor, and Eddie Harmon. 2024. "Characteristics of Powerful Radio Galaxies" Universe 10, no. 8: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10080319

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop