Next Article in Journal
Hypothalamic NAD+-Sirtuin Axis: Function and Regulation
Previous Article in Journal
Homocysteine Induces Inflammation in Retina and Brain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/biom10030394
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Head-to-Head Comparison of the Incremental Predictive Value of The Three Established Risk Markers, Hs-troponin I, C-Reactive Protein, and NT-proBNP, in Coronary Artery Disease

by
Julius Nikorowitsch
1,
Francisco Ojeda
1,
Karl J. Lackner
2,3,
Renate B. Schnabel
1,4,
Stefan Blankenberg
1,4,
Tanja Zeller
1,4,† and
Mahir Karakas
1,4,*,†
1
Clinic of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
2
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55122 Mainz, Germany
3
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Rhein-Main, 55131 Mainz, Germany
4
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg, 23538 Lübeck, Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal contribution.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(3), 394; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10030394
Submission received: 27 January 2020 / Revised: 22 February 2020 / Accepted: 29 February 2020 / Published: 4 March 2020
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Risk stratification among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is of considerable interest to potentially guide secondary preventive therapies. Cardiac troponins as well as C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and natriuretic peptides have emerged as biomarkers for risk stratification. The question remains if one of these biomarkers is superior in predicting adverse outcomes. Thus, we perform a head-to-head comparison between high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), hsCRP, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with CAD. Plasma levels were measured in a cohort of 2193 patients with documented CAD. The main outcome measures were cardiovascular (CV) death and/or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years, all three biomarkers were associated with cardiovascular death and/or MI. After adjustments for conventional cardiovascular risk factors, the hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) for the prediction of CV death and/or nonfatal MI was 1.39 [95% CI: 1.24–1.57, p < 0.001] for hsTnI, 1.41 [95% CI: 1.24–1.60, p < 0.001] for hsCRP, and 1.64 [95% CI: 1.39–1.92, p < 0.001] for NT-proBNP. However, upon further adjustments for the other two biomarkers, only NT-proBNP was still associated with the combined endpoint with an HR of 1.47 [95% CI: 1.19–1.82, p < 0.001]. Conclusively, NT-proBNP is reliably linked to CV death and MI in patients with CAD and provides incremental value beyond hsCRP and hsTnI.

1. Introduction

Stratification for subsequent coronary events among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is of considerable interest due to the potential to guide secondary preventive therapies [1,2]. Several biomarkers have emerged as prediction tools for future adverse events in patients with coronary heart disease.
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is the preferred biomarker for the detection of heart failure [3]. However, elevated levels of NT-proBNP are also associated with long-term adverse cardiac events in the general population and in patients with CAD [4,5]. In fact, in the general population, not only natriuretic peptides but high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and high-sensitivity troponins (hsTnI) were also among the biomarkers with the highest predictive value for adverse cardiovascular events [6]. Furthermore, all three biomarkers proofed prognostic for cardiovascular events, especially in patients with coronary artery disease [7,8,9]. However, it is unknown if one of these biomarkers is superior to the others in risk prediction. If so, this biomarker could potentially qualify for routine risk assessment in the high-risk population of patients with coronary heart disease.
Therefore, it is the aim of this study to perform a head-to-head comparison of hsTnI, hsCRP, and NT-proBNP as prognostic biomarkers for the prediction of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction in a cohort of 2193 patients with angiographically documented CAD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

In the AtheroGene cohort, a total of 3800 patients who underwent coronary angiography at the Department of Medicine II of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz or the Bundeswehr-Zentralkrankenhaus Koblenz between June 1999 and March 2000 were recruited [10,11]. Patients’ exclusion criteria were as follows: evidence of hemodynamically significant valvular heart disease, surgery, or trauma within the previous month; known cardiomyopathy; known cancer; febrile conditions; or use of oral anticoagulant therapy within the previous four weeks. Patients with missing information on the clinical presentation, missing laboratory measurements, or lack of information on the cause of death were excluded, resulting in a subgroup of 3423 participants. Additionally, missing samples and low sample volumes led to exclusion. Thus, the analyses were performed in 2193 subjects. Baseline characteristics were not relevantly different between the stable angina pectoris (SAP) and the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) cohort.
The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethic Board of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz and the Physicians’ chamber of the State Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany) under the number 837.057.99. All participants gave written informed consent.

2.2. Data Collection

At baseline, all participants were subject to a standardized questionnaire containing sociodemographic information and medical history. In addition, information was taken from the patients’ hospital charts. CAD was diagnosed if the coronary angiogram showed at least one stenosis >30% in a major coronary artery. Unstable angina was diagnosed according to Braunwald [12]. This included new onset of severe or accelerated angina, or angina at rest. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was either ST-segment elevation with significant elevation of at least 2 mV in at least two contiguous leads, or nonST-elevation myocardial infarction based on clinic and positive in-house troponin concentrations. The final diagnosis of ACS (UA, NSTEMI, or STEMI) or SAP, which included patients presenting with chest pain not fulfilling the ACS criteria, was made retrospectively based on the judgment of two physicians, with access to the history and nature of the presenting symptoms, medical history, results of physical examination, and all of the medical records available from index hospitalization (including the results of troponin testing).
Arterial hypertension was defined as mean blood pressure of 140 mmHg (systolic) over 90 mmHg (diastolic). Subjects taking antihypertensive medication were also classified as having arterial hypertension, even if the blood pressure was controlled. Smokers were defined as patients who had smoked in the past 40 years, and nonsmokers as those who ceased smoking more than 40 years ago or who had never smoked. Diabetes mellitus was defined as patients taking oral blood glucose lowering therapy or substituting insulin. Dyslipidemia was defined according to guidelines of the time of the start of the study as an LDL/HDL ratio of >3.5. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared (kg/m2).
Median follow-up after discharge was 3.8 years. Information was obtained from the patients using a mailed standardized questionnaire. Information regarding adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and treatment since discharge from the in-hospital rehabilitation clinic was obtained from the primary care physicians also by means of a standardized questionnaire. If a subject had died during follow-up, the death certificate was obtained from the local Public Health Department and the main cause of death was coded according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 pos. 390–459: ICD-10 pos. I0–I99 and R57.0). Adverse CVD events were defined either as CVD as the main cause of death (as stated in the death certificate), or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). All nonfatal adverse events were reported by the primary care physicians.

2.3. Laboratory Methods

Blood samples were obtained before angiography and application of heparin in a fasting state. EDTA and serum samples were stored after centrifugation and aliquotation at −80 °C for future laboratory analysis in all patients.
Plasma levels of hsTnI were determined using the Architect immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostics, ARCHITECT i1000SR). The limit of detection for the assay was 1.9 (range, 0–50,000) ng/L. The inter coefficient of variation (CV) was 2.88%, and the intra CV was 6.69%.
C-reactive protein was determined by a highly sensitive, latex particle-enhanced immunoassay (detection range of 0 to 20 mg/L, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The measurement of NT-proBNP was performed on the ELECSYS 2010 by electrochemiluminescence sandwich immunoassay (ECLIA, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The analytical reporting range is indicated as 5–35,000 ng/L. The lowest concentration detectable with an inter-assay CV of 20%, the functional assay sensitivity, is <50 ng/L. The interassay imprecision is 2.2–5.8% for the luminescence immunoassay. All biomarkers were measured in a blinded fashion.

2.4. Statistical Methods

The study population was described with respect to various sociodemographic and medical characteristics using quartiles for continuous variables and absolute and relative frequencies for binary variables. Differences between the ACS and SAP groups were tested using the Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for binary variables. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to describe unadjusted associations of the three biomarkers with conventional cardiovascular risk factors and with each other. To examine adjusted associations of the three markers with conventional cardiovascular risk factors, each marker was linearly regressed after log-transformation on the following variables: age, sex, BMI, diabetes, smoking status, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. To display survival curves produced by the Kaplan–Meier method, subjects were grouped according to tertiles of biomarkers. The p-value displayed on the graphics is for the log-rank test (testing that the null hypothesis of equality of survival curves versus at least two of the curves is different). The association of circulating biomarker levels, used after log-transformation, with cardiovascular mortality and nonfatal MI during follow-up was assessed by Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for age (years) and sex (model 1). In additional models, the age- and sex-adjustment was extended to conventional cardiovascular risk factors (BMI, diabetes, smoking status, dyslipidemia, hypertension (model 2)), and the respective two other biomarkers (model 3).
The assumptions for using Cox regression were tested, and no evidence of violation was found. Additionally, the C-index and the categorical net reclassification index (NRI) were calculated using the category five-year event probabilities and were used to compare the performance of different models. The following risk categories were used for the NRI computations: <1%, 1–5%, 5–10%, and >10%. Multiple imputation was used to fill the missing values. It was performed by using Multivariate Imputations by Chained Equations (MICE), as proposed by Buuren and Groothuis-Oudshoorn [13]. All computations were performed with R version 3.6.1 (http://www.r-project.org/). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

A total of 2193 individuals with evident CAD and available hsTnI measurements were included in this analysis. Table 1 presents the main sociodemographic and laboratory characteristics of the individuals at baseline, stratified according to the diagnosis at presentation ACS or SAP. Baseline characteristics were not relevantly different between the SAP and the ACS cohort. The mean age of SAP patients was 64 years, and similarly 63 years in ACS. The majority of participants were male—77.1% in the SAP cohort and 76.2% in the ACS cohort. As expected, in patients with ACS, levels of hsTnI, hsCRP, and NT-proBNP were higher and hypertension was more frequent than in SAP patients. Dyslipidemia was present in 77.4% of the SAP cohort, compared to 64.4% in the ACS cohort.
During a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 231 (10.5%) cardiovascular deaths or nonfatal MI were documented, 114 (8.4%) among SAP patients and 117 (14%) in the ACS cohort.
In order to assess the correlation of each hsTnI, hsCRP, and NT-proBNP with common cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, smoking status, and arterial hypertension, as well as amongst each other, Spearman correlation coefficients (R) were calculated (Table 2). The strongest associations were observed for the biomarkers with each other, in particular for NT-proBNP and hs-TnI with a correlation coefficient of 0.6 (p < 0.001). Weaker but still significant correlations were observed for diabetes and age with all three biomarkers.
Linear regression demonstrated significant associations of the three biomarkers with most of the mentioned common cardiovascular risk factors. However, an R2 of 0.1 for NT-proBNP was higher than that of hsCRP and hsTnI, each of which had an R2 of 0.06, suggesting a larger influence of the cardiovascular risk factors on NT-proBNP levels than on hsCRP levels and hsTnI levels.
Survival curves according to tertiles of circulating hsTnI levels (p < 0.001), hsCRP levels (p < 0.0001), and NT-proBNP levels (p < 0.0001) evidenced the prognostic relevance of the three biomarkers for cardiovascular death and/or nonfatal MI (Figure 1).
In Cox regression analyses with adjustment for sex and age (model 1), the hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) for the prediction of cardiovascular death and/or MI during follow-up was 1.37 [95% CI: 1.23–1.53, p < 0.001] for hsTnI, 1.41 [95% CI: 1.24–1.60, p < 0.001] for hsCRP, and 1.65 for NT-proBNP [95% CI: 1.40–1.93, p < 0.001] (Table 3).
After further multivariate adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (model 2), all three biomarkers still enabled a strong prediction of future cardiovascular death and/or MI, with an HR per SD of 1.39 [95% CI: 1.24–1.57; p < 0.001] for hsTnI, 1.41 [95% CI: 1.24–1.60, p < 0.001] for hsCRP, and 1.64 [95% CI: 1.39–1.92; p < 0.001] for NT-proBNP. However, further adjustments for the other two biomarkers, respectively, led to an attenuation of the predictive value of both hsTnI with an HR per SD of 1.14 [95% CI: 0.95–1.38, p = 0.16] as well as hsCRP with an HR of 1.16 per SD [95% CI: 0.99–1.35, p = 0.064]. Only for NT-proBNP the predictive value remained significant for cardiovascular death and/or MI beyond the other two biomarkers, with an HR per SD of 1.47 [95% CI: 1.19–1.82, p < 0.001]. In addition, NT-proBNP allowed for a strong prognostication of the outcome cardiovascular death, after full adjustments (model 3), with an HR per SD of 2.42 [95% CI: 1.86, 3.15, p < 0.001] (Table 4).
Accordingly, an NRI of 0.282 [95% CI: 0.114–0.450] as well as a C-index difference of 0.053 [95% CI: 0.017–0.089, p = 0.0038] proofed an additional prognostic power of NT-proBNP beyond both cardiovascular risk factors and the biomarkers hsTnI and hsCRP. In contrast, both hsTnI with an NRI of 0.011 [95% CI: −0.064–0.086] and a C-index difference of 0.002 (p = 0.56), and hsCRP with an NRI of 0.024 [95% CI: −0.042–0.091] and a C-index difference of 0.006 n (p = 0.26), showed no significant improvement of discrimination.

4. Discussion

4.1. NT-proBNP Levels Progosticate CV Death and MI Beyond hsCRP and hsTnI

The present study aimed for the head-to-head comparison of three established blood-based cardiovascular biomarkers. Therefore, we assessed the prognostic value of circulating levels of hsTnI, NT-proBNP, and hsCRP for cardiovascular death and secondary myocardial infarction, as well as cardiovascular death alone in a cohort of patients with documented CAD. Our data revealed a statistically significant impaired prognosis with increasing levels of all three biomarkers independent of traditional cardiac risk factors. However, in a head-to-head comparison, only NT-proBNP yielded additional prognostic value beyond the other two biomarkers.
The prognostic relevance of troponins, hsCRP, and natriuretic peptides, in patients with CAD, has been established before [8,9,10,11]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate and demonstrate a significant additional prognostic value of NT-proBNP beyond hsCRP and hsTnI in patients with coronary artery disease.
In the general population, troponin, hsCRP, and NT-proBNP were the three biomarkers best predicting cardiovascular adverse events among 30 tested biomarkers during a follow-up of ten years [6]. The combined use of NT-proBNP and hsCRP improves long-term risk prediction of mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease [14]. NT-proBNP, in contrast to contemporary-sensitive Troponin T, improved risk prediction and classification compared to the Framingham Risk Score and the pooled Cohort Risk Equation in 5592 asymptomatic participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [15]. Similarly, compared to a conventional troponin assay, NT-proBNP was superior in risk prediction in a cohort of 987 patients with stable coronary heart disease [9].
Elevated NT-proBNP levels not only precede the development of arterial hypertension, a major risk factor for CAD, but were inversely associated with myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance before and after the administration of adenosine in 184 asymptomatic individuals, suggesting an association of NT-proBNP levels and microvascular dysfunction [16,17].
Accordingly, our study demonstrates that NT-proBNP levels not only outperform the prognostic value of hsCRP but also outperform hsTnI in risk estimation.
Consequently, the biomarker NT-proBNP seems to be the most appropriate biomarker for mid-term risk estimation in CAD patients compared to the biomarkers hsCRP and hsTnI.

4.2. Pathophysiologic Considerations

NT-proBNP is a cleavage product of proBNP that is released by the myocardium in response to left ventricular wall stress [18,19]. In patients with stable coronary artery disease, relevant coronary stenosis may cause transient myocardial ischemia, thereby probably increasing wall stress and releasing natriuretic peptides [20]. Accordingly, recent studies found a correlation of natriuretic peptides with ischemic burden, hence the amount of affected myocardium [21]. The amount of ischemic myocardium is known to be predictive for adverse outcomes in CAD patients [22]. Acute coronary syndromes imply malfunctioning myocardium, hence increasing regional wall stress. The levels of natriuretic peptides therefore represent the functional consequences of myocardial damage. Conversely, levels of hsCRP, reflecting systemic inflammation, do not seem to be equally predictive for adverse events in CAD patients. Similarly, hsTnI, which is released from acutely injured myocardium, appears to be inferior to NT-proBNP in risk prediction [23]. After all, hemodynamic consequences as a result of ventricular dysfunction caused by CAD, which are best represented by NT-proBNP, might be the best parameter for the prediction of future adverse events. Therefore, it seems plausible that NT-proBNP plays an important role in risk stratification in CAD patients and might be superior to hsCRP and hsTnI.

4.3. Future Perspectives

Risk stratification for secondary adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease will be increasingly important in the future, especially for individually tailored therapy. Here, we suggest NT-proBNP as a candidate biomarker for risk prediction in patients with CAD, as part of a risk prediction panel including additional biomarkers. Microvesicles, which are small extracellular membrane particles shed by activated and apoptotic cells, have emerged as promising biomarkers for risk prediction not only in many inflammation-associated disorders in general but especially in cardiovascular diseases [24,25]. Although specific roles of each phenotype still remain to be further evaluated, a multipanel approach including NT-proBNP might facilitate risk prediction in CAD patients [26]. Such multimarker approaches should be further evaluated, and maybe in addition to other risk factors, reliable risk prediction tools could be developed.

4.4. Study Limitations

Our study has some limitations that need to be addressed. As typical for CHD populations, women were clearly underrepresented. Although we had a large sample of ACS patients, fatal CVD events were limited in this study population. Furthermore, our study population only represents patients with CAD who underwent coronary angiography. This population might differ from CAD patients without the need for coronary intervention. Therefore, the predictive value of NT-proBNP, hsTnI, and hsCRP levels should also be assessed in those patients. As blood samples have been stored for up to 20 years at −80 °C, long-term storage might affect measurements of hsTnI, NT-proBNP, or hsTnI. Additionally, participant acquisition was conducted from 1999 to 2000, so that altered therapy regimen might influence the transferability of the results to contemporary patient populations. Finally, net reclassification indices, as well as Cox regression analyses, should be interpreted with caution, due to possible misinterpretations and over-adjustment.

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that hsTnI, hsCRP, and NT-proBNP levels prognosticate cardiovascular mortality and nonfatal MI in patients with coronary artery disease. However, only NT-proBNP yields an additional prognostic value beyond the two other markers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.N., T.Z., and M.K.; methodology, J.N., T.Z., K.J.L., and M.K.; software, F.O.; validation, K.J.L., R.B.S., and F.O.; formal analysis, F.O.; investigation, J.N., T.Z., M.K.; K.J.L., and R.B.S.; resources, S.B., T.Z., and M.K.; data curation, F.O.; writing—original draft preparation, J.N., M.K.; writing—review and editing J.N., F.O., K.J.L., R.B.S., S.B., T.Z., and M.K.; visualization, F.O.; supervision, T.Z. and M.K.; funding acquisition, S.B., T.Z., M.K., K.J.L., and R.B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the ‘Stiftung Rheinland-Pfalz für Innovation’, ministry for science and education (AZ 15202–386261/545); by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement No. HEALTH-F2-2011-278913 (BiomarCaRE); the German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e.V.), grant number 81Z1710101; and by the European Research Area Network (ERA-Net PREMED-CAD, grant number 01KL1807). Abbott Diagnostics supported the study and donated the hsTnI assays.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the technical assistance of Sarah Dünger, Sabine Gerth, Katharina Schünemann, Wong Leng, and Hsü-Walczak.

Conflicts of Interest

J.N., F.O., and K.J.L. do not report any conflicts of interest. R.B.S. reports honoraria from Pfizer and Bristol-Myers-Sqibb. S.B. reports grants from Abbott Diagnostics, and honoraria from Abbott Diagnostics, Siemens, Thermo Fisher, and Roche Diagnostics. M.K. reports grant support from Adrenomed and Vifor, and honoraria from Adrenomed, Vifor, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, and Sanofi. T.Z. reports grant support from Vifor.

References

  1. Fox, K.A.A.; Carruthers, K.F.; Dunbar, D.R.; Graham, C.; Manning, J.R.; De Raedt, H.; Buysschaert, I.; Lambrechts, D.; Van de Werf, F. Underestimated and under-recognized: The late consequences of acute coronary syndrome (GRACE UK-Belgian Study). Eur. Heart J. 2010, 31, 2755–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wijeysundera, H.C. Association of Temporal Trends in Risk Factors and Treatment Uptake with Coronary Heart Disease Mortality, 1994–2005. JAMA 2010, 303, 1841–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ponikowski, P.; Voors, A.A.; Anker, S.D.; Bueno, H.; Cleland, J.G.F.; Coats, A.J.S.; Falk, V.; González-Juanatey, J.R.; Harjola, V.P.; Jankowska, E.A.; et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 2129–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, T.J.; Larson, M.G.; Levy, D.; Benjamin, E.J.; Leip, E.P.; Omland, T.; Wolf, P.A.; Vasan, R.S. Plasma natriuretic peptide levels and the risk of cardiovascular events and death. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mishra, R.K.; Beatty, A.L.; Jaganath, R.; Regan, M.; Wu, A.H.B.; Whooley, M.A. B-type natriuretic peptides for the prediction of cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease: The Heart and Soul Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2014, 3, e000907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Blankenberg, S.; Zeller, T.; Saarela, O.; Havulinna, A.S.; Kee, F.; Tunstall-Pedoe, H.; Kuulasmaa, K.; Yarnell, J.; Schnabel, R.B.; Wild, P.S.; et al. Contribution of 30 biomarkers to 10-year cardiovascular risk estimation in 2 population cohorts: The MONICA, risk, genetics, archiving, and monograph (MORGAM) biomarker project. Circulation 2010, 121, 2388–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Omland, T.; de Lemos, J.A.; Sabatine, M.S.; Christophi, C.A.; Rice, M.M.; Jablonski, K.A.; Tjora, S.; Domanski, M.J.; Gersh, B.J.; Rouleau, J.L.; et al. Prevention of Events with Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) Trial Investigators. A sensitive cardiac troponin T assay in stable coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 2538–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Haverkate, F.; Thompson, S.G.; Pyke, S.D.; Gallimore, J.R.; Pepys, M.B. Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet 1997, 349, 462–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bibbins-Domingo, K.; Gupta, R.; Na, B.; Wu, A.H.B.; Schiller, N.B.; Whooley, M.A. N-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiovascular events, and mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease. JAMA 2007, 297, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Blankenberg, S.; Rupprecht, H.J.; Bickel, C.; Torzewski, M.; Hafner, G.; Tiret, L.; Smieja, M.; Cambien, F.; Meyer, J.; Lackner, K.J. Glutathione Peroxidase 1 Activity and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 1605–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Karakas, M.; Schulte, C.; Appelbaum, S.; Ojeda, F.; Lackner, K.J.; Münzel, T.; Schnabel, R.B.; Blankenberg, S.; Zeller, T. Circulating microRNAs strongly predict cardiovascular death in patients with coronary artery disease-results from the large AtheroGene study. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Calvin, J.E.; Klein, L.W.; VandenBerg, B.J.; Meyer, P.; Condon, J.V.; Snell, R.J.; Ramirez-Morgen, L.M.; Parrillo, J.E. Risk stratification in unstable angina. Prospective validation of the Braunwald classification. JAMA 1995, 273, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Van Buuren, S.; Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. J. Stat. Softw. 2011, 45, 1–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ndrepepa, G.; Kastrati, A.; Braun, S.; Mehilli, J.; Niemöller, K.; Beckerath von, N.; Beckerath von, O.; Vogt, W.; Schömig, A. N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein in stable coronary heart disease. Am. J. Med. 2006, 119, 355.e1–355.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Daniels, L.B.; Clopton, P.; deFilippi, C.R.; Sanchez, O.A.; Bahrami, H.; Lima JA, C.; Tracy, R.P.; Siscovick, D.; Bertoni, A.G.; Greenland, P.; et al. Serial measurement of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin T for cardiovascular disease risk assessment in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am. Heart J. 2015, 170, 1170–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Sanchez, O.A.; Jacobs, D.R.; Bahrami, H.; Peralta, C.A.; Daniels, L.B.; Lima, J.A.; Maisel, A.; Duprez, D.A. Increasing aminoterminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide precedes the development of arterial hypertension: The multiethnic study of atherosclerosis. J. Hypertens. 2015, 33, 966–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Mitchell, A.; Misialek, J.R.; Folsom, A.R.; Duprez, D.; Alonso, A.; Jerosch-Herold, M.; Sanchez, O.A.; Watson, K.E.; Sallam, T.; Konety, S.H. Usefulness of N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide and Myocardial Perfusion in Asymptomatic Adults (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). Am. J. Cardiol. 2015, 115, 1341–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yoshimura, M.; Yasue, H.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H.; Jougasaki, M.; Mukoyama, M.; Nakao, K.; Imura, H. Different secretion patterns of atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 1993, 87, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mishra, R.K.; Judson, G.; Christenson, R.H.; DeFilippi, C.; Wu, A.H.B.; Whooley, M.A. The Association of Five-Year Changes in the Levels of N-Terminal Fragment of the Prohormone Brain-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) with Subsequent Heart Failure and Death in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The Heart and Soul Study. Cardiology 2017, 137, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kotecha, D.; Flather, M.D.; Atar, D.; Collins, P.; Pepper, J.; Jenkins, E.; Reid, C.M.; Eccleston, D. Alternative Risk Markers in Coronary Artery Disease (ARM-CAD) Study. B-type natriuretic peptide trumps other prognostic markers in patients assessed for coronary disease. BMC Med. 2019, 17, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Goetze, J.P.; Christoffersen, C.; Perko, M.; Arendrup, H.; Rehfeld, J.F.; Kastrup, J.; Nielsen, L.B. Increased cardiac BNP expression associated with myocardial ischemia. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2003, 17, 1105–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ladenheim, M.L.; Pollock, B.H.; Rozanski, A.; Berman, D.S.; Staniloff, H.M.; Forrester, J.S.; Diamond, G.A. Extent and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion as predictors of prognosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1986, 7, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Mair, J.; Lindahl, B.; Hammarsten, O.; Müller, C.; Giannitsis, E.; Huber, K.; Möckel, M.; Plebani, M.; Thygesen, K.; Jaffe, A.S. How is cardiac troponin released from injured myocardium? Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2018, 7, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Słomka, A.; Urban, S.K.; Lukacs-Kornek, V.; Żekanowska, E.; Kornek, M. Large Extracellular Vesicles: Have We Found the Holy Grail of Inflammation? Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Badimon, L.; Suades, R.; Arderiu, G.; Peña, E.; Chiva-Blanch, G.; Padró, T. Microvesicles in Atherosclerosis and Angiogenesis: From Bench to Bedside and Reverse. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2017, 4, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Badimon, L.; Suades, R.; Vilella-Figuerola, A.; Crespo, J.; Vilahur, G.; Escate, R.; Padró, T.; Chiva-Blanch, G. Liquid Biopsies: Microvesicles in Cardiovascular Disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 10 00394 g001 550
Figure 1. Survival curves for cardiovascular (CV) death and/or acute myocardial infarction (MI) according to tertiles of levels of hsTnI: (a) (1st tertile up to 5.20 ng/L; 2nd tertile up to 24.63 ng/L), NT-proBNP, (b) (1st tertile up to 132.74 pg/mL; 2nd tertile up to 418.14 pg/mL) and hsCRP, and (c) (1st tertile up to 2.04 mg/L; 2nd tertile up to 6.35 mg/L) in all. The p-values are for the logrank test.
Figure 1. Survival curves for cardiovascular (CV) death and/or acute myocardial infarction (MI) according to tertiles of levels of hsTnI: (a) (1st tertile up to 5.20 ng/L; 2nd tertile up to 24.63 ng/L), NT-proBNP, (b) (1st tertile up to 132.74 pg/mL; 2nd tertile up to 418.14 pg/mL) and hsCRP, and (c) (1st tertile up to 2.04 mg/L; 2nd tertile up to 6.35 mg/L) in all. The p-values are for the logrank test.
Biomolecules 10 00394 g001
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the study patients with coronary heart disease.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study patients with coronary heart disease.
SAPACSp-Value
n1,356837
Age (years) *64.0 (56.0, 70.0)63.0 (55.0, 70.0)0.61
Male No. (%)1045 (77.1)638 (76.2)0.69
BMI (kg/m2) *27.2 (25.0, 30.1)27.1 (24.9, 29.7)0.23
Diabetes No. (%)318 (23.5)171 (20.4)0.11
Current smoker No. (%)285 (21.0)235 (28.1)<0.001
Dyslipidemia No. (%)1049 (77.4)539 (64.4)<0.001
Hypertension No. (%)1108 (81.7)574 (68.6)<0.001
NT-proBNP (pg/mL) *#178.4 (82.6, 458.7)435.2 (165.5, 1426.0)<0.001
hsCRP (mg/L) *#2.7 (1.3, 6.0)6.2 (2.4, 17.9)<0.001
hsTnI (ng/L)5.8 (3.3, 12.6)142.8 (10.4, 2754.2)<0.001
SAP = stable angina pectoris, ACS = acute coronary syndrome, BMI = body mass index, NT-proBNP = N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, hsCRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and hsTnI = high-sensitivity troponin I. * Median 25th and 75th quartile cut-point. # only available in a subset of patients.
Table
Table 2. Spearman correlations of selected variables with hsTnI, hsCRP, and NT-proBNP.
Table 2. Spearman correlations of selected variables with hsTnI, hsCRP, and NT-proBNP.
VariablehsTnIhsCRPNT-proBNP
Age0.10 (p < 0.001)0.08 (p < 0.001)0.29 (p < 0.001)
Male0.04 (p = 0.072)−0.11 (p < 0.001)−0.13 (p < 0.001)
BMI0.00 (p = 0.850)0.10 (p < 0.001)−0.05 (p = 0230)
Diabetes0.05 (p = 0.020)0.05 (p = 0.021)0.08 (p < 0.001)
Smoker0.13 (p < 0.001)0.13 (p < 0.001)0.01 (p = 0.810)
Dyslipidaemia−0.10 (p < 0.001)−0.08 (p < 0.001)−0.06 (p = 0.084)
Hypertension−0.10 (p < 0.001)−0.04 (p = 0.055)0.00 (p = 0.940)
NT-proBNP0.60 (p < 0.001)0.39 (p < 0.001)1
CRP0.44 (p < 0.001)10.39 (p < 0.001)
hsTnI10.44 (p < 0.001)0.6 (p < 0.001)
Table
Table 3. Association of circulating biomarkers with cardiovascular death and/or MI during follow-up. The hazard ratios (HRs) are per standard deviation.
Table 3. Association of circulating biomarkers with cardiovascular death and/or MI during follow-up. The hazard ratios (HRs) are per standard deviation.
ModelHR (95% CI)p-ValueNN Events
hsTnI11.37 (1.23, 1.53)<0.0012193231
21.39 (1.24, 1.57)<0.0012193231
31.06 (0.90, 1.26)0.4702193231
hsCRP11.41 (1.24, 1.60)<0.0012193231
21.41 (1.24, 1.60)<0.0012193231
31.16 (0.99, 1.35)0.0642193231
NT-proBNP11.65 (1.40, 1.93)<0.0012193231
21.64 (1.39, 1.92)<0.0012193231
31.47 (1.19, 1.82)<0.0012193231
HR = hazard ratio and CI = confidence interval. Model 1: adjusted for age, sex; Model 2: additionally adjusted for body-mass-index, diabetes, smoking status, dyslipidemia, and hypertension; Model 3: additionally adjusted for log(NT-proBNP) and log(hsCRP). Circulating biomarkers were used log-transformed.
Table
Table 4. Association of circulating biomarkers with cardiovascular death during follow-up. The HRs are per standard deviation.
Table 4. Association of circulating biomarkers with cardiovascular death during follow-up. The HRs are per standard deviation.
ModelHR (95% CI)p-ValueNN Events
hsTnI11.39 (1.19, 1.61)<0.0012193123
21.43 (1.22, 1.67)<0.0012193123
30.81 (0.65, 1.02)0.0772193123
hsCRP11.60 (1.35, 1.89)<0.0012193123
21.63 (1.38, 1.94)<0.0012193123
31.26 (1.02, 1.55)0.0312193123
NT-proBNP12.37 (1.92, 2.91)<0.0012193123
22.39 (1.93, 2.95)<0.0012193123
32.42 (1.86, 3.15)<0.0012193123
Model 1: adjusted for age and sex; Model 2: additionally adjusted for body-mass-index, diabetes, smoking status, dyslipidemia, and hypertension; Model 3: additionally adjusted for log(NT-proBNP) and log(hsCRP). Circulating biomarkers were used log-transformed.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikorowitsch, J.; Ojeda, F.; Lackner, K.J.; Schnabel, R.B.; Blankenberg, S.; Zeller, T.; Karakas, M. Head-to-Head Comparison of the Incremental Predictive Value of The Three Established Risk Markers, Hs-troponin I, C-Reactive Protein, and NT-proBNP, in Coronary Artery Disease. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10030394

AMA Style

Nikorowitsch J, Ojeda F, Lackner KJ, Schnabel RB, Blankenberg S, Zeller T, Karakas M. Head-to-Head Comparison of the Incremental Predictive Value of The Three Established Risk Markers, Hs-troponin I, C-Reactive Protein, and NT-proBNP, in Coronary Artery Disease. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(3):394. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10030394

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikorowitsch, Julius, Francisco Ojeda, Karl J. Lackner, Renate B. Schnabel, Stefan Blankenberg, Tanja Zeller, and Mahir Karakas. 2020. "Head-to-Head Comparison of the Incremental Predictive Value of The Three Established Risk Markers, Hs-troponin I, C-Reactive Protein, and NT-proBNP, in Coronary Artery Disease" Biomolecules 10, no. 3: 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10030394

APA Style

Nikorowitsch, J., Ojeda, F., Lackner, K. J., Schnabel, R. B., Blankenberg, S., Zeller, T., & Karakas, M. (2020). Head-to-Head Comparison of the Incremental Predictive Value of The Three Established Risk Markers, Hs-troponin I, C-Reactive Protein, and NT-proBNP, in Coronary Artery Disease. Biomolecules, 10(3), 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10030394

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop