Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Profiles, Bioactive Compounds, and Antioxidant Capacity in Lentinula edodes Cultivated on Log versus Sawdust Substrates
Next Article in Special Issue
Neuropathological Changes in the Brains of Suicide Killers
Previous Article in Journal
Modification of Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase with Nitric Oxide: Role in Signal Transduction and Development of Apoptosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing Protein Biomarkers to Detect Lethal Acute Traumatic Brain Injuries in Cerebrospinal Fluid
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of 14C, 13C and Aspartic Acid Racemization in Teeth and Bones to Facilitate Identification of Unknown Human Remains: Outcomes of Practical Casework

1
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
2
Department of Forensic Medicine, The National Board of Forensic Medicine, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
3
Tandem Laboratory, Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(11), 1655; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111655
Submission received: 25 September 2021 / Revised: 22 October 2021 / Accepted: 2 November 2021 / Published: 8 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Postmortem Biochemistry-When Death Matters)

Abstract

:
The identification of unknown human remains represents an important task in forensic casework. If there are no clues as to the identity of the remains, then the age, sex, and origin are the most important factors to limit the search for a matching person. Here, we present the outcome of application of so-called bomb pulse radiocarbon (14C derived from above-ground nuclear bomb tests during 1955–1963) analysis to birthdate human remains. In nine identified cases, 14C analysis of tooth crowns provided an estimate of the true date of birth with an average absolute error of 1.2 ± 0.8 years. Analysis of 14C in tooth roots also showed a good precision with an average absolute error of 2.3 ± 2.5 years. Levels of 14C in bones can determine whether a subject has lived after 1955 or not, but more precise carbon turnover data for bones would be needed to calculate date of birth and date of death. Aspartic acid racemization analysis was performed on samples from four cases; in one of these, the year of birth could be predicted with good precision, whereas the other three cases are still unidentified. The stable isotope 13C was analyzed in tooth crowns to estimate provenance. Levels of 13C indicative of Scandinavian provenance were found in known Scandinavian subjects. Teeth from four Polish subjects all showed higher 13C levels than the average for Scandinavian subjects.

1. Introduction

Dead victim identification constitutes an important task for forensic professionals including forensic pathologists, anthropologists, and odontologists in their daily casework, particularly in mass disasters. If there are no clues as to the identity of the deceased, age, sex, and origin represent particularly important information to limit the search for possible matching persons. Whereas the sex often can be determined by morphological characteristics, or by DNA analysis, the age of adult subjects is more difficult to estimate. Since structural parts of teeth and bones are highly resistant to decomposition, chemical degradation, and heat, they may constitute the only material available for forensic analyses. Many different methods for estimating the age of a deceased person have been published, most of them based on examination of teeth and bones. Anthropological analyses based on morphological changes typically provide age estimation errors for adults of ±10 years [1,2,3,4,5,6], which imply intervals that are too wide to offer meaningful help in practical casework. A number of chemical and molecular analytical methods have therefore been developed to improve the accuracy of predicting the age of deceased subjects [1,2,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. One of the most useful chemical methods to assess age is aspartic acid racemization (AAR) analysis, which is based on the gradual increase in the D-form of aspartic acid in tissues with age. Virtually all amino acids undergo conversion from L-form to D-form with time, and the extent of racemization of amino acids can be used to estimate the age of various tissues [18,19]. Of all stable amino acids, aspartic acid has one of the fastest racemization rates and is, therefore, the amino acid most frequently used for age estimation. Tissues with low metabolic rates, such as tooth enamel and dentin, are most suitable for analysis. Hence, AAR for the purpose of age estimation is most often performed on tooth dentin, and some studies have reported mean average errors as low as 2–4 years [7].
In practical casework, the primary focus is to determine whether the find is of human origin, and then whether it is recent or old, warranting a further police investigation or not. One powerful technique that is useful in this respect is the retrospective radiocarbon dating of modern biological material [20,21]. In forensic casework, the estimation of time of death is particularly important since it may be decisive as to whether the police should investigate or close the case. [22,23].
Carbon-14 (14C) is naturally formed in the atmosphere by cosmic rays’ interactions with nitrogen-14 (15N). Carbon atoms in the atmosphere are quickly oxidized to form CO2, which is then incorporated into plants via photosynthesis. The 14C levels in the atmosphere have stayed fairly stable for several thousands of years. However, atmospheric above-ground detonations of nuclear weapons during the Cold War (1955–1963) almost doubled the concentration of 14C levels in the atmosphere, which was rapidly distributed around the globe [24,25]. This is known as the “bomb curve”, which reached its maximum concentration in 1963 (Figure 1). Since 1963, because of a worldwide test ban treaty, the 14C levels in the atmosphere have been decreasing exponentially. This decrease is not due to radioactive decay (14C has a half-life of 5730 years) but is caused by mixing with large marine and terrestrial carbon reservoirs.
The bomb pulse-generated artificial variation in atmospheric 14C levels has offered an opportunity to birthdate the formation of biological material using sensitive accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) analysis. We have taken advantage of this by analyzing 14C in tooth enamel, which does not exchange any carbon atoms with the environment after it has been formed. In their pioneering study, Spalding et al. [26] reported a mean absolute error of 1.6 ± 1.3 years in predicting the year of birth from 14C analysis of tooth enamel. Similar precision has subsequently been reported in several studies [27,28,29,30]. Alkass et al. further provided reference data for 14C incorporation times in tooth enamel, which are more practical to use than radiographic laydown times for the calculation of a person’s date of birth [31]. The limitation of bomb pulse radiocarbon analysis is that it cannot provide any useful estimates if the analyzed material was formed before 1955, given that nuclear bomb tests had not yet increased atmospheric 14C levels. Further, analysis of tissues with a high turnover—virtually all soft tissues except the lens of the eye [32]—will not provide a good estimate of the person’s year of birth or year of death, but rather a year in between, which will vary depending on the particular tissue’s carbon turnover rate. Another future problem is that the atmospheric levels are approaching baseline, meaning that the application of the method on subjects born today or later will not show such excellent precision.
In archeological casework, the collagen fraction of bone [33] is preferred for the estimation of year of death since it is less affected by external contamination of carbon. Collagen makes up a large proportion of the protein content of the skeletal tissue and is easy to extract. Since there is a turnover of collagen in the bones, the 14C levels will match times in between the birth and the death of the individual. For archeological studies, this is not a critical issue, but when dating post-bomb skeletal remains in criminal investigations, it is certainly important to be aware of the variation in levels that may be found in different types of bones of persons of varying ages [34,35].
In addition to radiocarbon dating of tooth crowns, it is also possible to analyze stable isotopes in tooth enamel and dentin to obtain clues about the provenance [28]. Although commercially available genomic tests may disclose ancestry, the geographical place where a person was born and/or raised may be quite different. Analysis of stable isotopes that show a geographical and/or cultural variation can provide more useful information. For instance, the levels of the isotopes 2H and 18O vary with latitude and precipitation, which in part are associated with the distance from coastal areas, and will show geographical variation, reflected in the drinking water. Hence, analysis of these isotopes in teeth will give a rough idea of the geographical region where a person was raised. In contrast, 13C levels reflect the diet, which partly depends on geography and partly on cultural habits. So-called C4 plants, which include crops that grow in hot areas (e.g., corn and sugar cane), enrich 13C due to a different CO2 assimilation as compared to so-called C3 plants (which include rice, potato, and beet root), which thrive in colder climate regions [36,37]. We have previously reported that teeth from subjects raised in different countries contain region-dependent variations [28,31].
Today, there are numerous publications on a variety of methods for age estimation of human remains, but there is a paucity of reports regarding the performance of these methods in practice. Hence, we sought to study the panorama of cases in which the police requested investigation regarding age, sex, and provenance, and to what extent the bomb pulse 14C method, AAR analysis, and 13C analysis could provide helpful information.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Examined Samples

The material studied consisted of teeth and bones from human subjects. The remains were obtained from the six Swedish forensic medicine departments, which in turn had received them from the police during the period 2011–2021. Table 1 provides an overview of the cases in which the police had requested further analysis regarding age, sex, and origin. For each case, we inquired about which parts of the material were available and asked the responsible pathologist which bones or teeth could be used for our analysis. Together with forensic odontologists, permanent teeth with the least or no caries, no restorations, no endodontic treatment, and a complete crown were selected, if available. The tooth number and the condition of the tooth were recorded as well as gender, if known. For cases lacking teeth, we used cortical bone from the bones that were available, which most often were calvarial bones or long bones, from the extremities. The police had opened a homicide investigation in all cases where the find was a whole body, and in several of the other cases as well (where partial remains were found).

2.2. Tooth Preparation

The soft tissue and dirt were removed mechanically using an odontological electric drill. The tooth crown was cut away from the root at the level of the cervical line. The crown and root were then incubated in 0.2 N HCl at room temperature in a sonicator water bath (Branson 150 GIMA, Gessate, Milano, Italy).The crown and root were washed three times with ddH2O and placed again into the sonicator water bath. This procedure was repeated three times, and the material was then dried at room temperature. Next, the entire crown and root were crushed using Qiagen Tissue-lyser II. A fine powder was obtained using a standard program with a run time of 30 s. The powder was then further pre-treated at the AMS laboratory.

2.3. Sample Pre-Treatment and AMS Analysis

Sample pre-treatment was performed on all samples prior to AMS analysis. The carbonate (mineral) fraction was analyzed for both tooth crown and root samples. In some cases, the collagen fraction was also analyzed in tooth roots to allow for comparison between the isotopic levels in the two fractions. For bone samples, only the collagen fraction was analyzed. Procedures for the extraction of each fraction are described below.

2.4. CO2 Extraction of Carbonate Fraction from Tooth Crown and Root

In this step, 10 mL 0.8 M HCl cooled to 5 °C was added to 200–500 mg of the tooth sample in a low vacuum reaction chamber. The subsequent leaching reaction was carried out at room temperature for a duration of at least 1 h until no further gas release was observed. The obtained CO2 was purified, split, cryogenically trapped, and finally reduced by graphitization with an iron catalyst [38,39].

2.5. Collagen Extraction from Bone and Tooth Root

Collagen extraction was performed by a standard HCl–gelatin procedure [40]. Sample pieces were cut mechanically from the bones, and the top layer was removed to eliminate possible contaminants from the surface. The sample pieces were then powdered in a mortar. Next, 100–500 mg of the bone sample was first de-mineralized by removing the apatite fraction with 0.8 M HCl at 10 °C until the evolving gases stopped after 30–60 min. The insoluble fraction was rinsed with de-ionized water to a neutral pH. Diluted HCl was added to the insoluble fraction and held at pH 3 for 6–8 h at 90 °C. The soluble fraction from this extraction contains the fraction with the highest amount of collagen and was dried and combusted. The obtained CO2 was split, purified, trapped, and reduced by graphitization with an iron catalyst [38,39].

2.6. AMS Analysis and Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry

The 14C AMS analysis was performed on the graphitized samples at the Tandem Laboratory, Uppsala University, using the 5 MV pelletron tandem accelerator or the MICADAS (mini radiocarbon dating system) [41,42]. Calibrated ages on the samples were obtained from the Oxcal website [43]. A small portion of the obtained CO2 that was split prior to graphitization was used to perform 13C and 15N stable isotope measurement using isotope ratio mass spectrometers, (VG OPTIMA dual inlet MS and Elementar precision IRMS, Isoprime Inc, Manchester, UK).

2.7. Determining Year of Birth from 14C Analysis: Teeth

The average age at which the formation of tooth crowns and roots is completed for each specific tooth has been determined previously and is dependent on the tooth number and gender. We used the formation times for tooth roots reported by Nolla [44], but for the enamel we used our own reference data for 14C incorporation times [31]. For the translation of tooth and bone 14C levels to matching atmospheric levels, we used the CALIbomb Levin data set [43] with 1.0 years smoothing and 2 σ error.

2.8. Selection of Cases for Aspartic Acid Racemization (AAR)

AAR analyses were performed on nine teeth from four cases to provide an estimate of the person’s age at death. These results were used to estimate the year of death in three cases, in which the year of birth had been estimated by 14C analysis, and conversely, to estimate the year of birth in one case with a known date of death.

2.9. Method Protocols for AAR Analysis

In Case 2, the AAR analysis was performed according to a previously described protocol [45]. Briefly, 1 mm-thick median longitudinal sections were made by cutting the teeth with a low-speed cutter (Isomet, 11-1180, Buehler, Chicago, IL, USA). After cleaning procedures, the dentin sections were pulverized in an agate mortar, and 10 mg of the powder was used as the specimen for determination of the racemization ratio. The D- and L-forms of aspartic acid were measured by gas chromatography using a glass capillary (GC-17A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) after hydrolysis and derivatization. The column of the glass capillary was 30 m in length, 0.3 mm in internal diameter, and coated with Chirasil-Val (GL Science, Tokyo, Japan). The concentration of the D-form was related to the concentration of the L-form, and the racemization ratio was expressed as ln((1 + D/L)/(1−D/L)). Plotting the chronological age on the x-axis and the racemization ratio on the y-axis, we derived the following linear regression equation by the least squares method:
ln[(1 + D/L)/(1 − D/L)]t = 2kt + ln[(1 + D/L)]t = 0
where ln ((1 + D/L)/(1 − D/L)) represents the log-transformed racemization ratio, t is the chronological age, and k is the racemization rate constant. To estimate the chronological age, we plotted the age against the racemization ratio and derived the following linear regression equation by the least squares method.
t = {ln[(1 + D/L)/(1 − D/L)]t − ln[(1 + D/L)/(1 − D/L)]t = 0}/2k
The estimated age was obtained by substituting the D/L ratio in this linear regression equation with that of the specimen to be estimated. For a detailed flowchart illustrating the method of racemization analysis, see [46].
Cases 14 and 16 were analyzed at the forensic toxicology laboratory in Linköping, Sweden. The analysis was performed on 1 mm-thick median longitudinal sections, prepared, cleaned, and pulverized as described above. The aspartic acid enantiomers were measured by (Nexera UHPLC Shimadzu, Stockholm, Sweden) with mass spectrometric detection, after hydrolysis and derivatization. The chiral column Astec Chirobiotic T 2, 1 × 250 mm, 5 μm was used. The concentrations of the D- and L-forms were determined, and the racemization ratio was expressed as above. Case 28 was analyzed at the Department of Legal Medicine, University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany, by gas chromatography with flame ionization detector according to a previously described protocol [47]. Briefly, horizontal rings of the roots beneath the cervical line were prepared. After careful cleaning steps and isolation of dentin, the samples were pulverized with a hydraulic press (P/O/Weber, Remshalden, Germany) at 20 kN. Next, the pulverized dentin was hydrolyzed in 1 mL 6 N hydrochloric acid for 6 h at 100 °C and dried in a vacuum desiccator. For derivatization, 1 mL isopropanol and 1 μL sulfuric acid were added to each sample, and the samples were heated at 110 °C for 1 h. After adding 1 mL 4 N ammonia solution and 1 M dichlormethane, the samples were centrifuged, and the resulting two phases were separated and dried again. Then, 1 mg dichlormethane and 50 μL trifluoroacetic acid (TFAA) were added. The samples were then heated for 15 min at 60 °C and dried using a nitrogen stream. Separation and quantification of D- and L-aspartic acid were performed on a chiral capillary column in a gas chromatograph (GC Shimadzu GC-2014, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Column: Chirasil-L-Val, Varian, (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A defined sample of aspartic acid with a known D/L ratio (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as a standard for quality assurance. Each sample was analyzed at least twice. The extent of aspartic acid racemization was calculated as ln((1 + D/L)/(1−D/L)) [47].

2.10. DNA Analysis

DNA analysis was performed at the Department of Forensic Genetics, Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine, Linköping, Sweden. The IdentiFilerTM and GlobalFilerTM STR kits (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 25 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Linear regression analysis was used to calculate the correlation between the estimated and true date of birth.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the material (tissue) used and the methods applied in each instance. Sixty-three teeth from a total of 34 individuals, and 24 bones from 21 individuals were analyzed.

3.1. Bomb Pulse 14C Dating of Tooth Crown Precisely Determines Date of Birth

Out of the 34 cases, 18 cases were found to be post-bomb, i.e., the tooth crown was formed later than 1955 (Table 2), allowing 14C bomb pulse dating. Nine of these 18 cases were eventually identified, and a high correlation was found between the estimated and true year of birth for these individuals with an average absolute error of 1.18 ± 0.83 years (R2 = .991, n = 9; Figure 2a). The 14C levels were consistently higher in the root than the crown if the crown was formed during the rising part of the bomb curve and were lower if the crown was formed around the peak or later. In the remaining nine cases, the identity has still not been established; these comprise two old Norwegian cases, four Swedish homicides where the investigation was still ongoing, and three cases that were closed.
In 25 cases, the tooth crowns of two or more teeth were analyzed from the same individual, with different tooth formation times. This allowed us to determine whether the values obtained match the rising or the falling part of the bomb curve [28]. The average of these two values was used to estimate the date of birth of the individual. To this end, we subtract the average 14C incorporation time [31], instead of the radiological formation time, yet the latter can provide a good correlation between the estimated and true date of birth of the individuals (absolute average error 1.3 ± 1.2 years, R2 = 0.987). Even if the person was born before the onset of the bomb curve, there is a possibility of observing positive 14C readings in the teeth: For the third molar in the upper jaw, the crown and the root are formed on average 11.7 and 17.0 years, respectively, after birth. For instance, in Case 33, tooth 43 showed a pre-bomb 14C level in the crown, but the root displayed a post-bomb value and allowed for an estimate of the person’s year of birth. This particular case is still under investigation and the identity not yet established. We also found a high correlation between the estimated age based on 14C levels in tooth roots and the actual age of the subject with an average absolute error of 2.3 ± 2.5 years (R2 = 0.941, n = 9, Figure 2b).

3.2. 14C Analysis of Bones

Table 3 summarizes the information about the 21 deceased persons from whom bone collagen was extracted and analyzed, and in eight cases, AMS analysis revealed post-bomb 14C values. From macroscopical examination of the remaining 13 cases, the police or forensic pathologist either concluded that the bones were modern or at least could not exclude this possibility. However, each of these cases provided pre-bomb 14C values, and given that these values suggested that some were very old (Table 3), the police were able to close the cases.
In two cases (14 and 41), both trabecular and cortical bone was analyzed. In Case 41, the trabecular bone sample showed a higher 14C level than the cortical bone sample, which can originate from a person who died during or some years after the peak of the bomb curve. In Case 14, the trabecular bone instead showed a lower 14C level than the cortical bone, suggesting that the person had been alive quite some time after the peak of the curve in 1963. In this case, the person was eventually identified and indeed was born in 1965.2, and was reported missing in 2008, but the true date of death had not yet been determined. We subsequently carried out AAR analysis of dentin from two teeth and estimated that the man was 36.7 years old when he died (Table 4). When adding this to the date of birth, we calculated the date of death to be 2001.9. We then also used the standardized lag time for carbon turnover for subjects of this age as suggested by Ubelaker [34], which gave 2001.6 as the estimated year of death.
Case 42 regards a newborn baby who was found severely decomposed in a plastic bag in a garden in 2018. The police suspected a 24-year-old woman to be the mother, and this was soon confirmed by DNA analysis. According to the woman, she gave birth to the child in 2009 (when she was 15 years old), yet this statement was questioned since the body had been lying outdoors and soft tissues remained. Since the baby lacked teeth, we carried out 14C analysis on the femur and found levels matching 2008.3, hence supporting the mother’s account. This implied that the woman was not prosecuted, given that she was underaged at the time of the event.

3.3. 13C in Teeth and Bones Can Tell Geographical Origin

The 13C levels in the carbonate fraction of all 114 tooth samples (crowns and roots) from 34 individuals were analyzed with IRMS. All subject information and raw data are listed in Table 2. In four cases (Cases 4, 5, 6, and 8), the 13C levels were higher than expected for Scandinavian subjects [28,31]. All four subjects were eventually identified, revealing that these individuals were born and raised in Poland and had average 13C levels of −12.7 ± 1.8 compared with −15.9 ± 1.8 for tooth samples from Swedish subjects in this study and −14.9 ± 0.3 for all Scandinavian subjects that we have analyzed previously reported [28,29,31]. In 20 tooth samples, both the collagen and carbonate fractions were measured, and the 13C levels averaged −12.6 ± 4.3 and −20.5 ± 4.2 in the carbonate and collagen fraction, respectively.
The 13C levels were also measured in the collagen fraction of 24 bones from 21 individuals (Table 3). The levels averaged −20.3 ± 2.3, hence being similar to the levels in the collagen fraction of teeth. The only outliers are Cases 33 and 36, with both cases still under investigation, pending clues as to both cause of death and identity. To assess the possible contamination of the samples, the stable isotope 15N was also measured. The ratio 13C and 15N (C/N) averaged 3.3 ± 0.1, supporting a good quality of the stable isotope samples; the C/N ratio should be in the range of 2.9–3.6 [48].

3.4. Aspartic Acid Racemization (AAR) Analysis

AAR was performed on root dentin samples from four cases (Table 4). In Case 14, this allowed for an estimate of the year of death of the person, since the year of birth had been estimated with 14C analysis, and this information helped the police to identity the person. The identities of the other three subjects have not as yet been determined. However, since we were able to estimate the year of birth for Cases 2 and 28, the AAR analysis allowed us to calculate the year of death by adding the estimated age at death, which was of particular interest to the police. However, both investigations are still ongoing.
Case 16, named the Isdal woman, has attracted wide interest since her partly burnt body was found in 1970 in a remote spot, Ice Valley (Isdal in Norwegian), near Bergen in Norway [49]. We obtained teeth from this case in 2019 and performed 14C analysis on the crowns of three teeth, but all showed pre-bomb values, including tooth 48, which has an average 14C incorporation time of 11 years after birth [31]. Hence, we then performed AAR analysis of dentin from three tooth roots to estimate the age at death, which then could be subtracted from the year of death. As seen in Table 4, the roots of teeth 24 and 25 gave a similar age, whereas the frontal tooth 22 gave a much younger age The average of all three teeth gave the estimated date of birth 1932.4, however the case remains unsolved.

3.5. DNA Analysis

In 13 cases, a successful DNA profile could be obtained using the IdentifilerTM or GlobalFilerTM PCR amplification kits, by which the gender can also be determined. Comparative analysis with these kits was performed in all nine cases that were eventually identified. In a further 12 cases, DNA profiling failed due to poor quality of the DNA. In the remaining cases, a few well-preserved bodies could be visually identified, and in other cases DNA profiling was not considered meaningful since the remains were too old to justify an investigation.

4. Discussion

We show here that radiocarbon bomb pulse 14C analysis of teeth is a technique that can be used in forensic practical casework to estimate the year of birth with a precision that is just as good as that observed for analysis of teeth extracted from living patients [26,27,28,29,30,31,50]. Concern has been expressed regarding the possibility of carbon contamination of tooth and bone samples from the environment [51]. For the bone samples analyzed, we cannot determine whether any such contamination might have influenced the 14C levels since the carbon turnover in the samples is unknown and hence it is not possible to tell which values are to be expected if contamination is absent. Regarding tooth enamel and dentin, however, we found that bomb pulse 14C analysis could predict the true year of birth with excellent precision even though several cases had been exposed to soil, air, and water for extended times, hence excluding any major degree of contamination of the teeth.
By cutting off the crown, removing dentin remnants, and then pulverizing the enamel mechanically with a bead mill, we could dramatically expedite the standard extraction procedure previously reported [28] while maintaining a high prediction precision. Originally, we treated the enamel with 10 N NaOH in an ultrasonic bath for one day, then removed non-enamel remnants and cleaned the samples, and again re-submerged them in new NaOH every 24 h for up to ten days [26,29]. Then we tried cryo-crushing the teeth in liquid nitrogen, but even if this technique provides a suitable powder in ten minutes, it requires liquid nitrogen to be available at any time needed. The Tissue-Lyser II offers a pure mechanical pulverization, and by optimizing the amplitude and frequency, we determined settings that produce a fine powder in 30 s. Hence, with this pulverization and cleaning and drying steps, enamel can typically be isolated within one day, and if the AMS lab has the opportunity to analyze the samples soon after arrival, results may be obtained in less than a week.
We also show that radiocarbon dating of tooth roots provides estimates of year of birth nearly as good as enamel, with no systematic deviation in the prediction of an individual’s date of birth. This suggests that dentin, even though it is considered a “living tissue”, has a very low turnover of carbon, otherwise we would have obtained estimates indicating a more recent year of birth for the subjects studied. This is in agreement with the results of AAR analysis of dentin, which requires a low turnover in order for the D-aspartic acid to be formed [52]. Roots are better preserved and less prone to odontological diseases than enamel, and therefore may represent a feasible alternative to enamel for birth dating. In addition, since tooth roots are formed later than the enamel, analysis of tooth roots can increase the chances of obtaining a positive signal in subjects born earlier before the onset of the bomb curve.
Compared with tooth enamel and dentin, bone tissue is continuously remodeled, implying a turnover of carbon at a pace that makes dating the birth or death of a person from 14C analysis in bone difficult. There are up to 220 different types of bones in the body, and their carbon turnover rates are not well characterized. Ubelaker et al. [20] have provided radiocarbon lag times for subjects of different ages to calculate date of death. However, their reported lag time averages for different decades of age of the individuals varied from 11.9 to 33.6 years. Hence, if the age of the individual is very uncertain, the calculation of date of death will result in a wide time window if reference lag times for several decades of life have to be used. If an estimate of year of birth is indeed available, such as from a post-bomb result of teeth, or if a method for estimating age at death has been employed, such as AAR or DNA methylation analysis, then the pertinent lag time may be used. Even more attractive, however, is the option of using reference carbon turnover data for different bones or different extraction fractions of bones and applying similar mathematical modeling used previously to calculate the turnover of various cell populations [53,54,55]. To obtain such reference data, analysis of fractions of select bones from subjects with known dates of birth and dates of death is required, which will take time. Hence, at present, a post-bomb 14C value suggests that the person was alive after 1955, whilst a pre-bomb value suggests that the person either was not alive after 1955 or died soon after that. If the 14C values are very high, it may be deduced that the person died within a decade or so after the bomb peak. In Case 47 (Table 3), the levels were very high, and it is obvious that the person must have lived through the bomb peak period, but most likely died not many years after that. If a find includes nails or hair, 14C analysis of these can provide an estimate of date of death with a good precision as they will show contemporary values [35,56,57]. When it comes to children, the age at death is usually fairly easy to estimate from morphological features, and regarding infants, such as Case 42, any tissue can be used for 14C dating since they will all have been formed within a short time window.
We have previously reported that combined AAR and AMS 14C analyses can be performed on teeth to provide information about both the year of birth and year of death of an individual [29]. AAR analysis of dentin provides information about the chronological age of an individual at death because the chemical conversion from the L-enantiomer to the D-enantiomer will typically stop completely after death, unless the body has been lying in a hot environment. AAR will, however, not inform us about the calendar year of birth (or death). To determine these calendar years, other methods must be used: either a 14C birth dating or an estimation of the postmortem interval. One advantage of AAR analysis is that it is independent of the bomb peak and hence can be used for age determination of subjects born long before the beginning of above-ground nuclear weapon testing. Several factors, however, will affect the precision of this method; as the racemization process is effectively a function of temperature and time, the precision varies depending on the tooth type analyzed, most likely due to their exposure to different ambient temperatures [58]. In Case 16 (the Isdal woman), all teeth had been exposed to a fire that could have affected the racemization ratio, and hence the age estimation. However, if the fire had influenced the racemization process, a higher ratio would have been expected for tooth 22 compared with teeth 24 and 25 positioned further back.
Studies on hair samples from subjects from different countries [59] have shown that stable isotopes can display geographical signatures. Similarly, we have reported geographically different 13C levels in teeth extracted from patients in many different countries [28,31]. In the present study, most subjects showed carbonate fraction levels around −15, which we previously have found in teeth from known Scandinavian persons. Interestingly, the 13C levels in teeth from subjects raised in Poland all had higher levels. When assessing people on the American continent, the high 13C levels result from a traditional dietary intake of products from C4 plants, such as corn and sugar cane, but for people living in continental Europe, no such reference 13C data or suggested explanation for the elevated concentrations exist. Case 18 was born in Vietnam but raised in Sweden and showed, on average, a 13C concentration of 14.6 [37,60]. The 13C levels in tooth crowns are shown in Table 2.
Finally, it should be noted that 13C levels are different in the carbonate and collagen fractions due to variable fractionation in biological tissue structures [61]. For Scandinavians, the δ13C in the collagen fraction will be approximately −20 while the levels in the carbonate fraction will show a higher average, around −15, irrespective of whether the collagen is extracted from teeth or bone. Whilst considerable data detailing carbonate δ13C in teeth exist from different countries [28,31], no similar reference information exists for the collagen fraction. From the levels measured in the carbonate and collagen fractions of the same samples (Table 1 and Table 2), it is, however, likely that a standard difference may be applied to collagen levels to then approximate the levels in the carbonate fraction; we found an average difference of −7.9 between these fractions in the 20 tooth samples with parallel analysis.
In order to exclude the possibility that external contamination had affected the 13C levels, we also measured the 15N concentrations and calculated the C:N ratio, which should range between 2.9 and 3.6 in collagen samples from bone [62]. For all bone samples analyzed, the C:N ratio fell within this range, averaging 3.3 ± 0.1.

5. Conclusions

We show that radiocarbon dating of tooth enamel provides a very precise estimation of an individual’s date of birth and that very small amounts are sufficient for analysis. AMS determines the date of tooth formation, whilst AAR determines age of death. The combination of these methodologies offers considerable power to forensic pathologists and police authorities to help determine the identity and time of death of unidentified individuals. We expect an increased use in this strategy for as long as the bomb pulse 14C levels still remain elevated in the teeth of the population of interest, which implies two or three decades to come.

Author Contributions

R.T. and I.D. carried out the tissue sampling. R.T., J.B. and K.A. designed the study. K.A. supervised all parts of the project. All authors read, contributed to, and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Part of this work was supported by the Human Frontiers Science Program RR13461 and the Swedish Medical Research Council.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All samples were collected from human remains subjected to a forensic medicine examination upon the request of the police, and analysis of these samples was a part of the medico-legal investigation. All such casework is exempt from ethical review board evaluation. The European law regulating personal integrity, GDPR, excludes deceased subjects. The personal information of subjects who were finally identified was treated as a part of the casework, and the statistical processing and analysis for the study included de-identified data only.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are provided in the article. More exact date of birth for subjects that were identified represent confidential information which is archived at the Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge assistance by the staff at the Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine. The authors are also grateful for the valuable advice by Henrik Druid, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ritz-Timme, S.; Cattaneo, C.; Collins, M.; Waite, E.R.; Schütz, H.W.; Kaatsch, H.-J.; Borrman, H.I.M. Age estimation: The state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2000, 113, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Waite, E.; Collins, M.; Ritz-Timme, S.; Schutz, H.-W.; Cattaneo, C.; Borrman, H. A review of the methodological aspects of aspartic acid racemization analysis for use in forensic science. Forensic Sci. Int. 1999, 103, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hayman, J.; Oxenham, M. Human Body Decomposition; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 91–126. [Google Scholar]
  4. Catts, E.P.; Goff, M.L. Forensic entomology in criminal investigations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1992, 37, 253–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fitzgerald, C.M.; Oxenham, M. Modelling time-since-death in Australian temperate conditions. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2009, 41, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amendt, J.; Richards, C.S.; Campobasso, C.P.; Zehner, R.; Hall, M. Forensic entomology: Applications and limitations. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2011, 7, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Böhme, P.; Reckert, A.; Becker, J.; Ritz-Timme, S. Molecular methods for age estimation: The current state of the art in relation to specific demands of forensic practice. Rechtsmedizin 2021, 31, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sirin, N.; Matzenauer, C.; Reckert, A.; Ritz-Timme, S. Age estimation based on aspartic acid racemization in dentine: What about caries-affected teeth? Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018, 132, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Klumb, K.; Matzenauer, C.; Reckert, A.; Lehmann, K.; Ritz-Timme, S. Age estimation based on aspartic acid racemization in human sclera. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2015, 130, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Becker, J.; Mahlke, N.S.; Reckert, A.; Eickhoff, S.B.; Ritz-Timme, S. Age estimation based on different molecular clocks in several tissues and a multivariate approach: An explorative study. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2019, 134, 721–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mahlke, N.S.; Renhart, S.; Talaa, D.; Reckert, A.; Ritz-Timme, S. Molecular clocks in ancient proteins: Do they reflect the age at death even after millennia. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2021, 135, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, Y.; Franzen, J.; Stiehl, T.; Gobs, M.; Kuo, C.-C.; Nikolić, M.; Hapala, J.; Koop, B.E.; Strathmann, K.; Ritz-Timme, S.; et al. New targeted approaches for epigenetic age predictions. BMC Biol. 2020, 18, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Koop, B.E.; Reckert, A.; Becker, J.; Han, Y.; Wagner, W.; Ritz-Timme, S. Epigenetic clocks may come out of rhythm—implications for the estimation of chronological age in forensic casework. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2020, 134, 2215–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Koop, B.E.; Mayer, F.; Gündüz, T.; Blum, J.; Becker, J.; Schaffrath, J.; Wagner, W.; Han, Y.; Boehme, P.; Ritz-Timme, S. Postmortem age estimation via DNA methylation analysis in buccal swabs from corpses in different stages of decomposition—A “proof of principle” study. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2020, 135, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tsuji, A.; Ishiko, A.; Ikeda, N. Telomere Shortening and Age Estimation in Forensic Medicine. Gerontology 2005, 51, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sánchez-Montes, G.; Martínez-Solano, Í.; Díaz-Paniagua, C.; Vilches, A.; Ariño, A.H.; Gomez-Mestre, I. Telomere attrition with age in a wild amphibian population. Biol. Lett. 2020, 16, 20200168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bonicelli, A.; Zioupos, P.; Arnold, E.; Rogers, K.D.; Xhemali, B.; Kranioti, E.F. Age related changes of rib cortical bone matrix and the application to forensic age-at-death estimation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Helfman, P.M.; Bada, J.L. Aspartic-Acid Racemization in Tooth Enamel from Living Humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1975, 72, 2891–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Helfman, P.M.; Bada, J.L. Aspartic acid racemisation in dentine as a measure of ageing. Nature 1976, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ubelaker, D.H. Radiocarbon Analysis of Human Remains: A Review of Forensic Applications. J. Forensic Sci. 2014, 59, 1466–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Buchholz, B.A.; Spalding, K.L. Year of birth determination using radiocarbon dating of dental enamel. Surf. Interface Anal. 2009, 42, 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Cardoso, H.F.; Puentes, K.; Soares, A.M.; Santos, A.; Magalhães, T. The value of radiocarbon analysis in determining the forensic interest of human skeletal remains found in unusual circumstances. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2012, 19, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ubelaker, D.H.; Buchholz, B.A. Complexities in the Use of Bomb-Curve Radiocarbon to Determine Time Since Death of Human Skeletal Remains. Available online: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/878206 (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  24. Vries, H.D. Atomic Bomb Effect—Variation of Radiocarbon in Plants, Shells, and Snails in the Past 4 Years. Science 1958, 128, 250–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nydal, R.; Lovseth, K. Distribution of Radiocarbon from Nuclear Tests. Nature 1965, 206, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Spalding, K.L.; Buchholz, B.A.; Bergman, L.E.; Druid, H.; Frisen, J. Forensics: Age written in teeth by nuclear tests. Nature 2005, 437, 333–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cook, G.T.; Dunbar, E.; Black, S.; Xu, S. A Preliminary Assessment of Age at Death Determination Using the Nuclear Weapons Testing 14C Activity of Dentine and Enamel. Radiocarbon 2006, 48, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Alkass, K.; Buchholz, B.; Druid, H.; Spalding, K. Analysis of 14C and 13C in teeth provides precise birth dating and clues to geographical origin. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011, 209, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Alkass, K.; Buchholz, B.A.; Ohtani, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Druid, H.; Spalding, K.L. Age estimation in forensic sciences: Application of combined aspartic acid racemization and radiocarbon analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2010, 9, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kondo-Nakamura, M.; Fukui, K.; Matsu’Ura, S.; Kondo, M.; Iwadate, K. Single tooth tells us the date of birth. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2010, 125, 873–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alkass, K.; Saitoh, H.; Buchholz, B.A.; Bernard, S.; Holmlund, G.; Senn, D.R.; Spalding, K.L.; Druid, H. Analysis of Radiocarbon, Stable Isotopes and DNA in Teeth to Facilitate Identification of Unknown Decedents. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lynnerup, N.; Kjeldsen, H.; Heegaard, S.; Jacobsen, C.; Heinemeier, J. Radiocarbon Dating of the Human Eye Lens Crystallines Reveal Proteins without Carbon Turnover throughout Life. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Taylor, R. Radiocarbon Dating an Archaeological Perspective; Routledge: London, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ubelaker, D.H.; Thomas, C.; Olson, J.E. The impact of age at death on the lag time of radiocarbon values in human bone. Forensic Sci. Int. 2015, 251, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Johnstone-Belford, E.C.; Blau, S. A Review of Bomb Pulse Dating and its Use in the Investigation of Unidentified Human Remains. J. Forensic Sci. 2019, 65, 676–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Farquhar, G.D.; Ehleringer, J.R.; Hubick, K.T. Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1989, 40, 503–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. O’Leary, M. Carbon Isotopes in Photosynthesis: Fractionation techniques may reveal new aspects of carbon dynamics in plants. Bioscience 1988, 38, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Santos, G.M.; Southon, J.R.; Druffel-Rodriguez, K.C.; Griffin, S.; Mazon, M. Magnesium perchlorate as an alternative water trap in AMS graphite sample preparation: A report on sample preparation at KCCAMS at the University of California, Irvine. Radiocarbon 2004, 46, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Vogel, J.S.; Southon, J.R.; Nelson, D.E. Catalyst and Binder Effects in the Use of Filamentous Graphite for Ams. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 1987, 29, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. E Taylor, R. Non-Concordance of Radiocarbon and Amino Acid Racemization Deduced Age Estimates on Human Bone. Radiocarbon 1983, 25, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Available online: https://www.tandemlab.uu.se/infrastruktur/acceleratorer (accessed on 10 March 2021).
  42. Synal, H.-A.; Stocker, M.; Suter, M. MICADAS: A new compact radiocarbon AMS system. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2007, 259, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Available online: http://calib.org/CALIBomb (accessed on 20 January 2021).
  44. Nolla, C.M. The development of the permanent teeth. J. Dental. Child 1960, 27, 254–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ohtani, S.; Yamamoto, T. Strategy for the Estimation of Chronological Age Using the Aspartic Acid Racemization Method with Special Reference to Coefficient of Correlation Between D/L Ratios and Ages. J. Forensic Sci. 2005, 50, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ohtani, S.; Yamamoto, T. Age Estimation by Amino Acid Racemization in Human Teeth. J. Forensic Sci. 2010, 55, 1630–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ritz-Timme, S. Lebensaltersbestimmung aufgrund des Razemisierungsgrades von Asparaginsaüre: Grundlagen, Methodik, Möglichkeiten, Grenzen, Anwendungsbereiche. Lübeck: Schmidt-Römhild. 1999; 84, (Arbeitsmethoden der medizinischen und naturwissenschaftlichen Kriminalistik). [Google Scholar]
  48. Boudin, M.; Boeckx, P.; Vandenabeele, P.; Van Strydonck, M. Improved radiocarbon dating for contaminated archaeological bone collagen, silk, wool and hair samples via cross-flow nanofiltrated amino acids. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 27, 2039–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isdal_Woman (accessed on 15 December 2020).
  50. Saitoh, H.; Moriya, T.; Takeyama, M.; Yusa, K.; Sakuma, A.; Chiba, F.; Torimitsu, S.; Ishii, N.; Sakurada, K.; Iino, M.; et al. Estimation of birth year by radiocarbon dating of tooth enamel: Approach to obtaining enamel powder. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2019, 62, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cook, G.T.; MacKenzie, A.B. Radioactive isotope analyses of skeletal materials in forensic science: A review of uses and potential uses. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2014, 128, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yamamoto, T.; Ohtani, S. Estimation of Chronological Age from the Racemization Rate of l- and d-Aspartic Acid: How to Completely Separate Enantiomers from Dentin. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 794, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bergmann, O.; Bhardwaj, R.D.; Bernard, S.; Zdunek, S.; Barnabe-Heider, F.; Walsh, S.; Zupicich, J.; Alkass, K.; Buchholz, B.A.; Druid, H.; et al. Evidence for Cardiomyocyte Renewal in Humans. Science 2009, 324, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Spalding, K.; Bergmann, O.; Alkass, K.; Bernard, S.; Salehpour, M.; Huttner, H.B.; Boström, E.; Westerlund, I.; Vial, C.; Buchholz, B.; et al. Dynamics of Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult Humans. Cell 2013, 153, 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ernst, A.; Alkass, K.; Bernard, S.; Salehpour, M.; Perl, S.; Tisdale, J.; Possnert, G.; Druid, H.; Frisén, J. Neurogenesis in the Striatum of the Adult Human Brain. Cell 2014, 156, 1072–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Santos, G.M.; De La Torre, H.A.M.; Boudin, M.; Bonafini, M.; Saverwyns, S. Improved radiocarbon analyses of modern human hair to determine the year-of-death by cross-flow nanofiltered amino acids: Common contaminants, implications for isotopic analysis, and recommendations. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2015, 29, 1765–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Geyh, M. Bomb radiocarbon dating of animal tissues and hair. Radiocarbon 2001, 43, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ohtani, S.; Ito, R.; Yamamoto, T. Differences in the D/L aspartic acid ratios in dentin among different types of teeth from the same individual and estimated age. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2003, 117, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Mutzel, E.; Lehn, C.; Peschel, O.; Holzl, S.; Rossmann, A. Assignment of unknown persons to their geographical origin by determination of stable isotopes in hair samples. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2009, 123, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Schoeller, D.A. Isotope Fractionation: Why Aren’t We What We Eat? J. Archaeol. Sci. 1999, 26, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lehn, C.; Rossmann, A.; Mayr, C. Stable isotope relationships between apatite phosphate (δ18O), structural carbonate (δ18O, δ13C), and collagen (δ2H, δ13C, δ15N, δ34S) in modern human dentine. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 2019, 34, e8674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Guiry, E.J.; Szpak, P. Quality control for modern bone collagen stable carbon and nitrogen isotope measurements. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2020, 11, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Average annual atomspheric 14CO2 records for Northen Hemisphere.
Figure 1. Average annual atomspheric 14CO2 records for Northen Hemisphere.
Biomolecules 11 01655 g001
Figure 2. Linear regression analysis of (a) the estimated date of birth (dob) based on 14C analysis of tooth crown and actual dob (R2 = 0.991). (b) the estimated dob based on 14C analysis of tooth roots and actual dob (R2 = 0.941).
Figure 2. Linear regression analysis of (a) the estimated date of birth (dob) based on 14C analysis of tooth crown and actual dob (R2 = 0.991). (b) the estimated dob based on 14C analysis of tooth roots and actual dob (R2 = 0.941).
Biomolecules 11 01655 g002
Table 1. Demographic information for the data used in the analysis of F14C, δ13C and AAR.
Table 1. Demographic information for the data used in the analysis of F14C, δ13C and AAR.
CaseSex 1Body Parts 2Tissue AnalyzedAnalyses 3EnvironmentRemains FoundIdentity EstablishedDNA Profiling
Teeth available
1FWhole bodyTeeth 16, 17, 4614C, 13CFire victim2012YesYes
2MWhole body, skeletonizedTeeth 15, 2714C, 13C, AARAir2013NoYes
3MMandibleTeeth 34, 3514C, 13CWater2013NoYes
4MWhole body, skeletonizedTeeth 35, 4314C, 13CAir2013YesYes
5MCraniumTeeth 13, 35, 4714C, 13CAir2015YesYes
6FWhole bodyTeeth 23, 34, 4214C, 13CWater2015YesYes
7NAMandibleTeeth 46, 4714C, 13CAir2015NoYes, but failed
8MWhole body, skeletonizedTeeth 14, 1714C, 13CSoil2015YesYes
9NACraniumTeeth 13, 1714C, 13CSoil2015No
10(F)Incomplete body, skeletonizedTeeth 14, 2114C, 13CAir2015No
11(F)Several bonesTeeth 13, 1514C, 13CAir2016No
12NASeveral bonesTeeth 34, 3814C, 13CWater2016NoYes, but failed
13NACraniumTeeth 16, 2414C, 13CSoil2017NoYes, but failed
14MSeveral bonesTeeth 18, 33, calvarium, humerus14C, 13C, AARWater2017YesYes
15NACraniumTeeth 21, 3814C, 13CAir2020No
16FWhole bodyTeeth 25, 33, 4814C, 13C, AARAir, fire1971NoYes
17FWhole bodyTeeth 31, 3414C, 13CAir, indoor1995NoYes
18NASeveral bonesTeeth 17, 33, 3414C, 13CWater2018YesYes
19NASeveral bonesTeeth 24, 2714C, 13CAir2018No
20NAMandibleTeeth 3814C, 13CAir2018No
21MWhole bodyTeeth 34, 4814C, 13CWater2019YesYes
22(M)CraniumTeeth 1314C, 13CSoil2019No
23MWhole body, skeletonizedTeeth 35, 4814C, 13CSoil2004No
24NAMandibleTeeth 4714C, 13CWater2019No
25NACraniumTeeth 17, 26, calvarium14C, 13CWater2019NoYes, but failed
26NAbones from at least 3 personsTeeth 17, 2514C, 13CSoil2019No
27NACraniumTeeth 26, 3614C, 13CAir2020No
28MSeveral bonesTeeth 16, 1814C, 13C, AARIn concrete2020NoYes
29NAbones from at least 2 personsTeeth 1714C, 13CSoil, plastic bags2021No
30MWhole bodyTeeth 3514C, 13CWater2020No
31MWhole bodyTeeth 4714C, 13CWater2021YesYes
32MSeveral bonesTeeth 2714C, 13CSoil2021No
33MWhole bodyTeeth 4314C, 13CSoil2003No
34NACraniumTeeth 3714C, 13CAir, indoor2021No
Teeth not available 4
35NACraniumCalvarium14C, 13CAir2014No
36FCranium and femurCalvarium14C, 13CWater2014NoYes, but failed
37FCraniumCalvarium14C, 13CAir2015NoYes
38FCraniumCalvarium14C, 13CAir2016NoYes, but failed
39NASeveral bonesCalvarium14C, 13CWater2015NoYes, but failed
40NASeveral bonesThoracic vertebra14C, 13CWater2017No
41MCraniumCalvarium14C, 13CWater2017NoYes, but failed
14MSeveral bonesCalvarium14C, 13CWater2017YesYes
42FWhole bodyFemur14C, 13CSoil2018No
43NASeveral bonesSacrum14C, 13CWater2019No
44NASeveral bonesCalvarium14C, 13CWater2019No
45NASeveral bonesFemur14C, 13CSoil2019No
46FCraniumCalvarium14C, 13CAir2019No
25NACraniumCalvarium14C, 13CWater2019NoYes, but failed
47NASeveral bonesHumerus14C, 13CWater2020NoYes, but failed
48NATibia, part ofTibia14C, 13CSoil2020No
49NASeveral bonesFemur14C, 13CSoil2021No
33MWhole bodyCalvarium14C, 13CSoil2003No
50NAFemurFemur14C, 13CSoil2021No
51NAHumerusHumerus14C, 13CWater2021No
52NAHumerusHumerus14C, 13CWater2021No
1 Brackets–sex was identified with conventional morphological skeletal markers. 2 In some cases, the find might have included additional bones that we were not informed about. 3 AAR–aspartic acid racemization. 4 Cases 14, 25, 33 teeth were analyzed.
Table 2. AMS F14C results for the tooth crowns and roots analyzed, and the estimated year of birth of the individuals.
Table 2. AMS F14C results for the tooth crowns and roots analyzed, and the estimated year of birth of the individuals.
CaseSexTissueToothTrue DOBTooth Formation Time (yrs)F14CError (2σ)δ13C (‰)Estimated Tooth DOBEstimated Person DOB *True DODD/L RatioEstimated Age (yrs)Estimated DODOrigin
1FCrown161989.21.51.0960.006−17.1NANA2011.9NA NASweden
1FCrown171989.25.11.0960.004−16.61999.51994.42011.9NA NASweden
1FCrown461989.23.01.1340.004−17.81992.81989.82011.9NA NASweden
1FRoot161989.26.81.0960.004−17.71999.4NA2011.9NA NASweden
1FRoot171989.211.01.0750.004−18.02003.41992.42011.9NA NASweden
1FRoot461989.26.71.1010.004−17.31998.41991.72011.9NA NASweden
2MCrown15NA4.81.2160.007−12.91984.31979.5NANA NA2014 ± 5NA
2MCrown27NA5.11.2020.007−12.01985.61980.5NANA NA2014 ± 5NA
2MRoot15NA11.71.1330.007−12.91993.01981.3NA0.112236NANA
2MRoot27NA12.41.1300.007−13.71993.31980.9NA0.118436NANA
3MCrown34NA4.10.9700.004−15.3Pre-bombPre-bombPre-bombNA NANASweden
3MCrown35NA5.30.9590.004−15.3Pre-bombPre-bombPre-bombNA NANASweden
3MRoot34NA10.60.9690.004NAPre-bombPre-bombPre-bombNA NANASweden
3MRoot35NA11.00.9660.004NAPre-bombPre-bombPre-bombNA NANASweden
4MCrown351992.75.31.1070.010−13.31997.41992.12012.0NA NA NA Poland
4MCrown431992.73.61.0990.009−8.71998.91995.32012.0NA NA NA Poland
4MRoot431992.79.81.0790.009−9.42003.11993.32012.0NA NA NA Poland
5MCrown131972.03.31.3460.018−13.21977.11973.82009.4NA NA NAPoland
5MCrown351972.05.31.3360.017−12.71977.61972.32009.4NA NA NAPoland
5MCrown471972.06.21.1460.015−13.51978.219722009.4NA NA NAPoland
5MRoot131972.010.21.2010.016−12.91986.219762009.4NA NA NAPoland
5MRoot351972.011.31.1670.015−13.41989.21977.92009.4NA NA NAPoland
5MRoot471972.012.21.3230.016−11.61992.01979.82009.4NA NA NAPoland
6FCrown231975.43.31.2830.013−11.21980.41977.12014.6NA NA 2014.7Poland
6FCrown341975.44.11.2750.013−11.81980.91976.82014.6NA NA 2014.7Poland
6FCrown421975.43.21.2990.016−12.91979.219762014.6NA NA 2014.7Poland
6FRoot231975.49.01.1710.011−11.9198819792014.6NA NA 2014.7Poland
6FRoot341975.49.31.1710.011−12.01988.41979.12014.6NA NA 2014.7Poland
6FRoot421975.46.51.1850.015−12.51987.21980.72014.6NA NA 2014.7Poland
7NACrown47NA6.21.0130.009−13.91956.01949.8NANA NANANA
7NACrown46NA3.00.9960.009−13.3Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
7NARoot47NA12.01.0160.009−13.51956.21944.2NANA NANANA
7NARoot46NA7.01.0120.009−14.91956.21949.2NANA NANANA
8MCrown141967.73.61.4500.012−15.01972.91969.32015.2NA NANAPoland
8MCrown171967.75.11.4400.014−14.91973.41968.32015.2NA NANAPoland
8MRoot141967.710.91.2600.012−15.71981.61970.72015.2NA NANAPoland
8MRoot171967.712.41.2300.012−16.11983.31970.92015.2NA NANAPoland
9MCrown13NA3.31.0420.005−13.01956.81953.5NANA NANANA
9MCrown17NA5.11.0530.007−15.31956.91951.8NANA NANANA
9MRoot13NA9.61.2800.007−15.31962.01952.4NANA NANANA
9MRoot17NA11.71.5160.008−15.51963.01951.3NANA NANANA
10(F)Crown14NA3.60.9360.005−6.0Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
10(F)Crown 21NA2.20.9410.005−6.1Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
10(F)Root 14NA9.70.9970.005−5.2Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
10(F)Root21NA8.30.9920.005−6.1Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
11(F)Crown 13NA3.30.98000.003−24.2Pre-bombPre-bombNANANAPre-bombNA
11(F)Crown 15NA4.80.9880.003−13.6Pre-bombPre-bombNANANAPre-bombNA
11(F)Root 13NA9.00.9790.003−12.9Pre-bombPre-bombNANANAPre-bombNA
11(F)Root 15NA10.70.9850.003−10.5Pre-bombPre-bombNANANAPre-bombNA
12NaCrown 34NA4.10.9850.004−13.2Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
12NaCrown 38NA11.00.9880.004−13.2Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
12NaRoot 34NA10.00.9820.004−12.4Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
12NaRoot 38NA17.00.9950.004−12.1Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
13NaCrown 16NA1.50.9720.006−14.9Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
13NaCrown 24NA3.60.9810.006−15.4Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
13NaRoot 16NA1.50.9710.007−14.4Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
13NaRoot 24NA3.60.9830.003−14.3Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
14MCrown 331965.23.61.5500.008−14.11969.41965.82008.6NANANAFinland
14MCrown 181965.211.51.3790.006−13.81975.51964.02008.6NANANAFinland
14MRoot 331965.29.81.3580.008−14.61972.81963.02008.6NANANAFinland
14MRoot 181965.217.01.2510.006−15.11978.41961.42008.6NANANAFinland
15(M)Crown21NA2.20.9030.004−14.2Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NA NA
15(M)Crown38NA11.00.9260.004−12.8Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NA NA
15(M)Root21NA7.40.9100.004−13.3Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NA NA
15(M)Root38NA17.00.9420.004−12.4Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NA NA
16FCrown25NA4.80.9800.004−14.3Pre-bomb1945.21970.9NA 25.7NA
16FCrown33NA3.60.9900.004−14.8Pre-bomb1927.41970.9NA 43.5NA
16FCrown48NA11.00.9800.004−13.7Pre-bomb1924.71970.9NA 46.2NA
17FCrown31NA1.91.4320.006−15.11973.51971.61995.2NA NA NANA
17FCrown34NA4.11.3940.005−13.91974.81970.71995.2NA NA NANA
17FRoot34NA9.31.2750.005−14.61980.61971.31995.2NA NA NANA
18MCrown331960.83.61.3130.004−15.11962.71959.12015.6NANANAVietnam
18MCrown341960.84.11.5160.004−13.91963.11959.02015.6NANANAVietnam
18MCrown171960.85.11.5820.004−13.51963.21958.12015.6NANANAVietnam
18MRoot331960.89.81.3990.004−15.11974.61964.82015.6NANANAVietnam
18MRoot341960.810.61.3840.004−14.61975.21964.62015.6NANANAVietnam
18MRoot171960.812.41.2560.004−15.31981.71969.32015.6NANANAVietnam
19MCrown24NA3.60.9500.003−13.2Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
19MCrown27NA5.10.9640.003−12.8Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
20NACrown38NA11.00.9000.003−20.2Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NANANA
21MCrown342002.44.11.1020.004−13.92003.41999.32018.6NA NA NALibya
21MCrown482002.411.01.0820.003−15.52014.82003.82018.6NA NA NALibya
21MRoot342002.410.61.0740.004−15.22003.51992.82018.6NA NA NALibya
21MRoot482002.417.01.0250.004−13.72015.01998.02018.6NA NA NALibya
22(M)Crown13NA3.30.9090.003−13.8Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NANA
22(M)Root13NA10.20.9460.003−13.8Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NANA
23MCrown35NA5.31.1270.003−12.71957.81952.5NANA NA NA NA
23MCrown48NA11.01.7020.005−12.91963.41952.4NANA NA NA NA
23MRoot35NA11.31.3860.003−13.21962.61951.3NANA NA NA NA
23MRoot48NA17.01.4460.005−13.31962.91945.9NANA NA NA NA
24MCrown47NA6.20.8090.003−14.3Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
24MRoot47NA12.20.8090.003−14.2Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
25NACrown17NA5.10.7720.003−12.3Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NA NA
25NACrown26NA1.50.7890.003−13.8Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NA NA
25NARoot17NA11.70.7690.003−20.7Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NA NA
25NARoot26NA7.10.7690.003−20.0Pre-bombPre-bombNANA NA NA NA
26NACrown17NA5.10.9890.004−14.3Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
26NACrown25NA4.80.9610.003−13.9Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
26NARoot17NA7.10.9860.004−15.1Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
27NACrown26NA1.50.9000.004−19.8Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
27NACrown36NA3.00.9300.004−19.7Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
28MCrown16NA1.51.1440.005−13.31991.81990.3NA0.07734.32016-nowNA
28MCrown18NA11.51.1080.004−13.41997.31985.8NA0.06736.9NA
29(M)Crown17NA5.10.9870.003−16.7Pre-bombPre-bombPre-bombNANAPre-bombNA
30MCrown35NA5.31.1270.004−15.71994.01988.7NANANANANA
30MRoot35NA11.31.0560.004−15.42007.41996.1NANANANANA
31MCrown471987.86.21.1230.004−14.81994.61988.32020.0NANANAGermany
31MRoot471987.812.21.0630.004−16.42005.91993.92020.0NANANAGermany
32MCrown27NA5.10.8970.003−14.3Pre-bombPre-bombPre-bombNANANANA
32MRoot27NA11.70.9370.003−13.7Pre-bombPre-bombPre-bombNANANANA
33MCrown43NA3.60.9920.004−12.2Pre-bombPre-bombNANANANANA
33MRoot43NA9.81.1760.004−13.11958.71949.9NANANANANA
34NACrown37NA6.20.9060.003−12.8Pre-bombPre-bombprebombNANANANA
34NARoot37NA12.00.9040.003−19.8Pre-bombPre-bombprebombNANANANA
* Estimated dob person (yrs) = estimated dob tooth (yrs)−tooth formation time (yrs).
Table 3. AMS F14C results for the bone samples. Levels above 1.0 imply that the person was alive after 1955. All values below 1.0 indicate that the person either was not alive after 1955 or died soon after that. All values represent analysis of cortical.
Table 3. AMS F14C results for the bone samples. Levels above 1.0 imply that the person was alive after 1955. All values below 1.0 indicate that the person either was not alive after 1955 or died soon after that. All values represent analysis of cortical.
CaseSexTissueTrue DOBF14CError (2σ)δ13C (‰)C/NEstimated Living Period
14MCalvarium1965.21.2470.006−20.93.3>1955
14MCalvarium (trabecular)1965.21.2100.006−21.83.3>1955
14MHumerus1965.21.2090.006−21.13.3>1955
25NACalvariumNA0.7700.003−20.63.2Before 1955
33MCalvariumNA1.1400.004−27.73.3>1955
35NACalvariumNA1.0400.008−24.23.3>1955
36FCalvariumNA1.0030.009−15.73.2Before 1955
37FCalvariumNA0.9790.006−20.5NABefore 1955
38FCalvariumNA1.1890.004−21.6NABefore 1963
39NAHumerusNA0.6930.003−18.13.3Before 1955
40NAThoracic vertebraNA0.9410.003−18.1NABefore 1955
41MCalvariumNA1.2160.006−21.03.4>1955
41MCalvarium (trabecular)NA1.2590.006−20.83.3>1955
42FFemur2009.91.0540.004−20.83.2>1955
43NASacrumNA0.9760.003−18.93.2Before 1900
44NACalvariumNA0.9130.003−18.73.2Before 1900
45NAFemurNA0.9730.003−19.43.2Before 1955
46FCalvariumNA0.9840.003−19.43.3Before 1900
47NAHumerusNA1.4320.005−20.1NABefore 1974
48NATibiaNA0.9910.004−19.23.2Before 1900
49NAFemurNA0.9180.003−19.13.2Before 1900
50NAFemurNA0.9940.003−20.43.3Before 1900
51NAHumerusNA0.7890.003−20.13.2Before 1900
52NAHumerusNA0.8540.003−19.33.2Before 1900
Table 4. Results of AAR analysis of teeth in four of the cases.
Table 4. Results of AAR analysis of teeth in four of the cases.
Case InformationRadiocarbon AnalysesAspartic Acid Analyses
CaseSexTissueTooth No.True DOBTrue DODTooth Formation TimeF14CError (2σ)δ 13C ‰Estimated Tooth DOBEstimated DOBAverage DOBD/L RatioEstimated AgeEstimated Year of Death
2MCrown15NANA6.61.2160.007−12.91984.31977.71978.4
2MCrown27NANA6.51.2020.007−12.01985.61979.1
2MDentin15NANA11.71.1330.007−12.91993,00.112236.02014 ± 5
2MDentin27NANA12.41.1300.007−13.71993.30.118436.02014 ± 5
14MCrown331965.22008.63.61.5500.008−14.11969.41965.81964.9
14MCrown181965.22008.611.51.3790.006−13.81975.51964.0
14MDentin331965.22008.63.6NANANANANA0.043336.82002.0
14MDentin431965.22008.63.6NANANANANA0.042836.6
16FCrown25NA1970.94.80.9800.004−14.3Pre-bombNA
16FCrown33NA1970.93.60.9900.004−14.8Pre-bombNA
16FCrown48NA1970.911.00.9800.004−13.7Pre-bombNA
16FDentin22NA1970.93.8NANANANA1945.20.055725.7
16FDentin24NA1970.93.6NANANANA1924.70.066046.2
16FDentin25NA1970.94.8NANANANA1927.40.064743.5
28MCrown16NANA1.51.1440.005−13.31991.81990.31988.0
28MCrown18NANA11.51.1080.004−13.41997.31985.8
28MDentin16NANA1.5NANANANANA0.07734.32016-today
28MDentin18NANA11.5NANANANANA0.06736.9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teglind, R.; Dawidson, I.; Balkefors, J.; Alkass, K. Analysis of 14C, 13C and Aspartic Acid Racemization in Teeth and Bones to Facilitate Identification of Unknown Human Remains: Outcomes of Practical Casework. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1655. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111655

AMA Style

Teglind R, Dawidson I, Balkefors J, Alkass K. Analysis of 14C, 13C and Aspartic Acid Racemization in Teeth and Bones to Facilitate Identification of Unknown Human Remains: Outcomes of Practical Casework. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(11):1655. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111655

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teglind, Rebecka, Irena Dawidson, Jonas Balkefors, and Kanar Alkass. 2021. "Analysis of 14C, 13C and Aspartic Acid Racemization in Teeth and Bones to Facilitate Identification of Unknown Human Remains: Outcomes of Practical Casework" Biomolecules 11, no. 11: 1655. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111655

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop