Next Article in Journal
Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Sitagliptin Phosphate Accelerates Cellular Cholesterol Efflux in THP-1 Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Abscisic Acid and Cytokinins Are Not Involved in the Regulation of Stomatal Conductance of Scots Pine Saplings during Post-Drought Recovery
Previous Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Modulators: The Defender
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Role of Phytohormones in Biomass and Polyphenol Accumulation in Salvia bulleyana In Vitro Culture

by
Izabela Grzegorczyk-Karolak
1,*,
Marta Krzemińska
1,
Anna K. Kiss
2,
Aleksandra Owczarek-Januszkiewicz
3 and
Monika A. Olszewska
3
1
Department of Biology and Pharmaceutical Botany, Medical University of Lodz, Muszynskiego 1, 90-151 Lodz, Poland
2
Department of Pharmacognosy and Molecular Basis of Phytotherapy, Warsaw Medical University, Banacha 1, Warsaw 02-097, Poland
3
Department of Pharmacognosy, Medical University of Lodz, Muszynskiego 1, 90-151 Lodz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(2), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020227
Submission received: 30 December 2022 / Revised: 21 January 2023 / Accepted: 22 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phytohormones 2022–2023)

Abstract

:
Salvia bulleyana is a plant native to the Chinese Yunnan Province. This species has been used in traditional Chinese medicine as a substitute for Danshen (the roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza). The aim of our study was to establish an effective system for propagating S. bulleyana shoots to obtain large amounts of material rich in bioactive compounds. Phytohormones were used to regulate shoot growth and regeneration potential and influence plant secondary metabolism. The shoot tips were incubated on a Murashige and Skoog agar medium supplemented with 0.1 or 0.5 mg/L IAA (indole-3-acetic acid) and the cytokinins benzylaminopurine (BAP), meta-topoline (M-T), 6-benzylaminopurine riboside (RBAP), N-benzyl-9-(2-tetrahydropyranyl)-adenine (BPA) or kinetin, (K) at concentrations of 0.5, 1 or 2 mg/L. It was observed that the type and concentration of growth regulator significantly influenced the regeneration potential of S. bulleyana shoots. The highest multiplication rate was obtained when 0.1 mg/L IAA and 2 mg/L BPA were used. Under these conditions, 100% of shoot tips formed buds and almost seven buds/shoot per explant were obtained after five weeks. Meanwhile, the highest biomass was found for shoots growing on a medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 1 mg/L M-T: 1.2 g of fresh weight and 0.17 g of dry weight. However, a medium with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 2 mg/L RBAP was most favorable for bioactive phenolic acid content, with a total polyphenol level (37.7 mg/g dw) 4.5 times higher than in shoots grown on medium without growth regulators (8.23 mg/g dw). Finally, optimal conditions were selected by TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution); the culture of S. bulleyana grown on an MS medium containing 0.1 mg/L IAA and 1 mg/L M-T was found to be the most efficient for polyphenol accumulation and can be used for the production of medicinally relevant compounds.

1. Introduction

In vitro plant cultures represent a potential efficient source of bioactive secondary metabolites. Such cultures demonstrate a short initiation time, independence from seasonality and climatic conditions and the possibility of producing new compounds—normally not found in the source plant [1,2]. However, the success of a plant culture depends on many factors, including culture genotype, growth conditions and the components of the culture medium. Among the latter, plant hormones play a particularly important role [3].
Phytohormones are biodegradable low-molecular-weight chemical messengers that regulate plant development and metabolism [3,4]. The exogenous application of growth regulators into the growth medium influences the growth of in vitro cultures and might promote a crop yield, with the results depending on both the type and concentration of phytohormone [5]. In plant biotechnology, natural and synthetic auxins and cytokinins are mainly used. Auxins are involved in cell division, cell enlargement and organ development, whereas cytokinins take part in many basic processes, including photosynthesis, maintenance of cell proliferation, cell differentiation and retardation of senescence. BAP has been the most widely used cytokinin in plant biotechnology for several decades. However, recently, there have been reports of media supplementation with various BAP derivatives, such as RBAP, BPA or M-T. These reports, although scarce, seem promising, both in terms of growth and bioactive metabolite accumulation [6,7].
Sage species have been used in the medicine of all cultures for centuries. The roots and shoots of Salvia plants contain a remarkably broad spectrum of secondary metabolites responsible for a wide range of pharmacological activities, demonstrating antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antiviral and antibacterial properties [8,9]. In Chinese medicine, Salvia miltiorrhiza is the best-known species, but around 40 other sages are locally used as substitutes, including S. bulleyana [10]. They have been used for treating cardiovascular, immune, hepatic and renal system diseases, and insomnia.
S. bulleyana (Zi Danshen) is a perennial plant that grows in the Chinese Yunnan Province. The main group of metabolites identified in its aerial and underground parts are hydrophilic phenolic acids, so these are most likely the secondary metabolites responsible for the biological activity of the raw material [11,12]. However, an obstacle to wider use and knowledge of the properties of S. bulleyana is the limited availability of this only locally occurring species. A previous biotechnological study on S. bulleyana examined the organogenic competence of various phytohormone combinations, to develop an efficient propagation strategy via leaf explants [13]. The shoots were regenerated in the presence of various cytokinins and then transferred onto an MS medium with BAP, the most commonly described cytokinin used for shoot proliferation of various Salvia species [14,15,16]. However, BAP does not yield spectacular results in the propagation of most Salvia spp., which prompts the search for other alternatives.
Biotechnological methods can be used not only to obtain a significant amount of plant material that is rarely found in the natural environment but can also significantly increase the level of bioactive compounds by modifying the cultivation conditions [3,5,17]. The aim of the study was to create an efficient system for propagating S. bulleyana that could be used to obtain a phenol-rich stock of plant material. The present study investigates the influence of different combinations of plant growth regulators on the growth and accumulation of phenolic acids in shoot culture. In the study, IAA as auxin and five cytokinins (K, BAP, BPA, RBAP and M-T) were used. The investigated cytokinins were provided in three concentrations (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) and auxin in two concentrations (0.1 and 0.5 mg/L). The presented work is the first such comprehensive report on the phytohormone-regulation of polyphenol metabolism in sage; it tests the effect of six phytohormones in 32 combinations on culture growth and proliferation and the accumulation of 15 bioactive constituents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

In vitro cultivated shoots of Salvia bulleyana, initiated from sterile germinated seeds, were used as the initial material. The seeds were obtained from the Botanical Garden of the University of Bonn (Bonn, Germany) (50°43′28.9″N 7°05′34.6″E). The procedure of seed sterilization, their germination and primary culture development were described earlier [13]. Voucher specimens of the shoot culture were deposited in the Department of Biology and Pharmaceutical Botany, Medical University of Lodz (voucher no. IG/SBS1-1/2019). The culture was grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium [18] with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 0.5 mg/L BAP. Fragments of shoots with a tip bud and a single node about 1 cm long (0.056 ± 0.005 g dry weight) were placed on an MS medium supplemented with 0.1 or 0.5 mg/L auxin (IAA) and various cytokinins (BAP, M-T, RBAP, BPA, K) at one of three concentrations: 0.5, 1 or 2 mg/L.

2.2. Culture Conditions

All the culture media were supplemented with 3% sucrose and 0.7% agar. The pH of the media was adjusted to 5.7–5.8. The shoots were grown in 150×4 mm glass tubes containing 25 mL of medium. Media were autoclaved for 19 min at a pressure of 1.1 kg/cm2 and 121 °C. The cultures were incubated in a controlled growth chamber for five weeks at 24 ± 2 °C and with a photoperiod of 16 h. The light was provided by fluorescent tubes of cool white light, which provided a light intensity of 40 µm/m2∙s.
The growth potential of the culture was measured by estimating the percentage of explants that formed buds, the number of regenerated buds and shoots produced per explant (proliferation coefficient), the length of the main shoots and the dry weight (dw) of the culture on each of the media after a five-week incubation.

2.3. Phytochemical Analysis

2.3.1. Sample Preparation

The dry lyophilized plant material for each treatment was ground using a grinder, and ground samples (0.1 g) were extracted with 30 mL of 80% methanol in a sonication bath (Techpan, Warsaw, Poland) at 40 °C for 15 min. The extractions were repeated twice more with less solvent (10 mL). The filtered extracts were combined, evaporated to dryness and stored in a refrigerator (4 °C) before analysis.

2.3.2. Phenolic Acid Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis

The phenolic profile of the hydromethanolic extract of the S. bulleyana shoots was determined by UPLC-DAD/ESI-MS/MS using a UPLC-3000 RS system (Dionex, Germany) equipped with an AmaZon SL ion trap mass spectrometer according to Grzegorczyk-Karolak et al. [12]. Compounds were analyzed in a negative ion mode and identified by comparing the information of their retention time, UV–vis and mass spectra with literature data [12,19,20].
For the quantitative HPLC-DAD assay, the samples were chromatographed using an Elite LaChrom Hitachi system (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) according to Wojciechowska et al. [19]. Peaks were identified on the basis of their retention time and by comparing spectra with those of isolated compounds in a standard solution or literature data [12,19,20]. For quantification, calibration curves were generated by plotting the peak area of the standard compounds at each level versus the concentration of the sample. Quantitative determination was performed using the following reference standards: caffeic acid purchased from Sigma Aldrich/Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), rosmarinic acid (RA) from Extrasynthese (Genay, France) and salvianolic acid A and salvianolic acid F from ChemFaces (Hubei, China). When an authentic standard was not available, the phenolic compounds were quantified according to the calibration curve of an appropriate similar standard: caffeoyl-threonic acid isomers as caffeic acid; methyl rosmarinate, RA hexoside, protolithospermic acid isomers, caffeic acid derivative and dehydrorosmarinic acid as RA; salvianolic acid K and a lithospermic acid isomer as salvianolic acid A; and isomers of salvianolic acid F as salvianolic acid F. Two minor analytes (dehydrorosmarinic acid and a caffeic acid derivative) were quantified as a sum, due to poor separation and low contents. The concentrations of the compounds were calculated as mg/g dry weight (dw) by comparing the peak areas of the compounds to those of the standards. Total phenolic content was calculated as the sum of the content of all quantified phenolic acids.

2.4. Establishment of Optimal Growth Conditions

The optimal phytohormone combination for growth was chosen from a given set of alternatives using the technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS). This method assumes that the best alternative is both closer to the positive ideal solution and far away from the negative ideal solution; it has already been successfully used to optimize the composition of growth media (vitamin and sugar content) for the cultivation of hairy roots of S. bulleyana [21].
The method consists of selecting decision parameters, normalizing them and assigning appropriate weights to them. Following this, the ideal best (V+) and ideal worst (V-) values are determined for each parameter, and the distance from the ideal best and ideal worst is defined for each alternative. Finally, the performance score is calculated for each treatment, and the one with the highest score is considered optimal. Four decision parameters of culture productivity were selected: dry weight of culture, multiplication ratio, RA content and total phenol content. Detailed calculations were made on the basis of the formulas described earlier [21].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were repeated three times with 10 explants per treatment (passages 24–26). The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Statistica 13.1 PL for Windows (StatSoft Inc., Krakow, Poland). Significantly different means were separated using Tukey’s post hoc test (p < 0.05). The TOPSIS calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel 2019 software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Phytohormones on Culture Growth

To determine the optimal type and concentration of cytokinins and auxin for the multiplication of Salvia bulleyana shoots, the apical parts of the shoots were placed on solid MS mediums with auxin IAA (0.1 and 0.5 mg/L) and one of the cytokinins: BAP, RBAP, M-T, BPA and K (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L). Shoots were grown for five weeks.
It was previously reported that the addition of a low concentration of auxin to a cytokinin had a positive effect on shoot regeneration and growth [22]. The auxin of choice for the study was IAA. This auxin has been extensively studied and often used in various in vitro plant cultures, including Salvia spp. [14,22,23]. The two IAA concentrations used in the present tests (0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L) were selected on the basis of their beneficial effects on growth and proliferation of other sage species shoots [14,22,23]. The inclusion of a strong, synthetic auxin in the medium or the use of a higher concentration could promote callus formation instead of organogenesis [14].
Auxin at a concentration of 0.1 mg/L turned out to be, in most cases, much more favorable for the growth of S. bulleyana cultures, judged by the proliferation coefficient, frequency of response, increase in dry matter and, often, the length of the main shoot (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). In contrast, a higher IAA concentration clearly limited the effect of the cytokinins on shoot proliferation.
Micropropagation of various Salvia species using different natural and synthetic cytokinins, including purine and urea derivatives, has been earlier reported [14,15,22,23,24,25,26]. The growth regulators with a purine skeleton in their molecule were selected for this study because they have been documented to encourage multiplication in Salvia spp. [22,23,24]. However, most of the previous studies used traditional cytokinins such as BAP and K [14,15,16,25,26]. BAP displayed strong proliferative potential for S. canadensis [25], with a mean value of 25 new shoots on nodal explants being obtained within 45 days, but the proliferation coefficients for shoot tips and nodal explants of different sage species obtained in the presence of BAP were not usually high and only rarely exceeded three new shoots [23,24,26,27]. The authors associate this with the strong tendency for apical dominance noticed in plants of this genus, which can result in the slow growth of regenerated shoots [15,26]. Therefore, in addition to two traditional cytokinins, BAP and K, three promising BAP derivatives (RBAP, BPA, M-T) were selected for the present experiment, based on recent advanced achievements in the field [27,28,29].
All cytokinins, except 0.5 mg/L of K, significantly enhanced the regeneration of S. bulleyana shoots at almost all concentrations, manifested by a high percentage of response and proliferation coefficients (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The results revealed that all the advanced cytokinins tested (BPA, M-T and RBAP) achieved a significantly higher percentage of shoot regeneration than the classical phytohormones, BAP and K.
The highest proliferation coefficient was almost seven yielded shoots grown on an MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/L auxin and 2 mg/L BPA (Figure 2); in this case, the mean length of the main shoot exceeded 1 cm (Figure 3). The culture grown in the presence of BPA was also characterized by a high value of dry weight (Figure 4).
Lowering the BPA concentration in the medium to 1 mg/L, without changing the auxin concentration, resulted in a slight decrease in the multiplication ratio—up to 6.2; however, reducing BPA to 0.5 mg/L resulted in more than a twofold (3.2) decrease (Figure 2). Reducing this cytokinin level also gradually decreased the percentage of explants, giving a proliferative response. However, this factor remained relatively high, even at the lowest concentration used (90%) (Figure 1).
BPA, although at a lower concentration (0.5 mg/L), is also proven to be optimal for stimulating bud regeneration in S. viridis cultures [27]. Moreover, BPA at a concentration of 2 mg/L has been found to increase the multiplication of Dracecephalum forrestii shoots [28].
A high multiplication coefficient (5.1–5.3) was also obtained for S. bulleyana in the presence of 1–2 mg/L RBAP and 0.1 mg/L IAA (Figure 2). In this case, 90–100% of the explants regenerated shoots/buds. However, despite being advantageous for proliferation, such concentrations of RBAP reduced shoot length, leaf size, and biomass accumulation (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Such findings are similar to those obtained for S. viridis cultures, where RBAP at all concentrations inhibited shoot elongation and increases in dry weight, giving results comparable to a control treatment (a medium only with auxin) [27]. On the other hand, in the present study, a lower RBAP concentration (0.5 mg/L) stimulated growth of the S. bulleyana culture with a slight increase in biomass (Figure 4). In that case, however, the multiplication coefficient drastically decreased (Figure 2).
The other BAP derivative used in the experiment was the hydroxyl derivative, M-T (Figure 3). The concentration of M-T at 1 and 2 mg/L, in combination with 0.1 mg/L IAA, gave a 96–100% regeneration rate (Figure 1) and a relatively high multiplication coefficient (Figure 2). Although these were not optimal conditions for S. bulleyana proliferation, this combination of growth regulators gave the highest increase in dry weight of the culture (over 30-fold, i.e., 0.15–0.17 g within five weeks) (Figure 4). Also, in studies on other plant species, M-T demonstrated a positive effect on growth and shoot quality. This cytokinin was found to increase the multiplication factor of various plant in vitro cultures, stimulate their growth and the transformation of buds into shoots, increase shoot survival and support their rooting [6,7,29]. Moreover, M-T was shown to be the most effective cytokinin for biomass growth in cultures of Prunus [30], Aloe [31] and Salvia species [27].
In contrast to BAP derivatives, BAP and K (the furfuryl aminopurine derivative), especially in the lowest concentration used (0.5 mg/L), were not very effective in the propagation of S. bulleyana shoots. The shoot formation frequency on explants and the proliferation ratio recorded for 0.5 mg/L K in the medium were comparable to those obtained for the control medium, i.e., with auxin alone (Figure 2). Both cytokinins at higher concentrations (1–2 mg/L) inhibited shoot elongation, and the biomass of cultures grown on media with K was also lower than the shoots developed on the medium without cytokinins (Figure 4). The low dry weight of the culture on K-containing media was due to poor multiplication but, above all, to the poor growth of the culture: the formation of only small number of small leaves. Previously, K turned out to also be unfavorable for the shoot regeneration of Salvia guaranitica and S. fruticosa [15,24]. However, this is not the rule in the case of all sage species: S. valentina and S. blancoana demonstrated twice the proliferation ratio in the presence of K compared with BAP [26].
Summarizing, BAP derivatives—both hydroxylated at the 3-position of the benzyl ring and with a substituted N9 position in the purine ring—demonstrated increased activity in stimulating growth compared to BAP itself, which may be a result of the prolongated metabolism of these compounds in the plant [32].

3.2. Effect of Phytohormones on Metabolite Accumulation

The phenolic profile of the obtained plant cultures was investigated using UPLC-DAD/ESI-MS/MS. Fifteen phenolic acids were identified in all extracts of the S. bulleyana shoots according to their retention time, UV spectra and mass spectra [12,19,20] (Table 1, Figure 5). All compounds were previously identified in other plants of the Salvia genus [12,19,20]. However, the level of the polyphenolic compounds was significantly influenced by the concentration of auxin and the type and concentration of cytokinin in the culture medium. Detailed contents of the individual compounds in shoots for individual treatments are presented in Table 2 and Table 3.
The predominant metabolite of hydromethanolic extract from the S. bulleyana culture was rosmarinic acid (RA). Its content in shoots grown on media with 0.1 mg/L IAA ranged from 8.24 to 33.67 mg/g dw (Table 2). The maximum level was found in an extract of shoots growing on the medium containing 0.1 mg/L IAA and 2 mg/L RBAP (Table 2). This amount of RA was twice as high as than that seen on the control medium, i.e., MS supplemented only with auxin (Table 2), and 4.5 times higher than on an MS medium without growth regulators (7.36 mg/g dw). The RA content gradually decreased when the RBAP concentration in the medium fell, reaching a level of 25.8 mg/g dw at 0.5 mg/L RBAP.
The addition of BPA and M-T to a medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/L IAA also improved RA biosynthesis in proliferating shoots. For example, RA accumulation in shoots cultivated on a medium containing 0.1 mg/L IAA and 2 mg/L BPA was approximately 29.3 mg/g dw, while with 0.5 mg/L, M-T was 27.2 mg/g dw (Table 2). However, these levels were about 15–20% less than in the shoots grown in optimal conditions, i.e., in the presence of 2 mg/L RBAP.
In case of S. viridis, supplementation of the MS medium with 2 mg/L BPA resulted in the highest content of RA in the shoots [27]. The RA level achieved under these conditions was twice as high as in the control treatment (MS medium only with auxin). BPA was also the most effective for RA biosynthesis in D. forrestii shoots [28]. However, in the latter study, the higher concentration of this cytokinin was optimal (5 mg/L), resulting in a five-fold increase in RA levels compared to the treatment without cytokinin in the medium.
Meanwhile, M-T particularly intensely stimulated phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in S. viridis shoots grown in vitro. The level of the main compound from this group, i.e., verbascoside, increased two- to five-fold, depending on M-T concentration and compared to the treatment on MS with 0.1 mg/L IAA [27].
Supplementing the growth medium with BAP and K was not beneficial for RA accumulation in S. bulleyana shoots. At the lower concentrations, BAP and K (0.5 and 1 mg/L) in the presence of 0.1 mg/L IAA, RA content in the culture was lower than in the control treatment (Table 2). Similar results were obtained previously for S. viridis culture and in the Scutellaria alpina shoots, where BAP itself did not stimulate verbascoside production [27,33]. In contrast, the accumulation of most hydroxybenzoic and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives in Merwilla plumbe plantlets was significantly enhanced in the presence of BAP, but only to a slight degree by M-T [34]. However, it is difficult to define the rule regarding the influence of different BAP derivatives on the production of polyphenolic compounds because existing studies are too scarce.
According to the present investigation, RA production was less efficient in shoots of S. bulleyana grown at higher IAA concentrations (Table 3), and smaller differences in RA levels were found between shoots grown at different concentrations of different cytokinins. However, RBAP, BPA and M-T were still more favorable for RA production, with RA levels ranging from 15 to 20.7 mg/g dw following the treatment with different concentrations of these three benzylaminopurine derivatives (Table 3).
A similar tendency was noted with respect to total phenolic (TP) content, due to the dominant RA share among polyphenols (Figure 6). The highest achieved TP level (37.7 mg/g dw) was found in shoots cultured on a medium with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 2 mg/L RBAP (Figure 6); this value was twice as high as that found in the control and three times that observed in the above-ground parts of two-year-old soil-grown plants [12].
The second-most prevalent compound in the S. bulleyana culture was salvianolic acid K (SAK). The addition of 0.1 mg/L auxin alone to the growth medium increased SAK accumulation 3.5 times compared to the MS medium without phytohormones, i.e., from 0.347 to 1.208 mg/g dw. However, adding cytokinins to the auxin-containing medium stimulated SAK biosynthesis only in the presence of 2 mg/L RBAP (1.37 mg/g dw). The remaining treatments, apart from 0.5 mg/L M-T and BPA, resulted in lower SAK levels than in the control medium, i.e., with auxin alone (Table 2). The effect of the higher IAA concentration (0.5 mg/L) was slightly weaker; it caused only a two-fold increase in the SAK content compared to the medium without any growth regulators (Table 3). A further increase in the SAK content was noted when the medium was supplemented with BAP at concentrations of 1 and 2 mg/L and its riboside (RBAP) at a concentration of 0.5 mg/L, but the obtained values were significantly lower than those described for optimal treatment (Table 2).
For most phenolic acids quantified in the study, shoots grown on a medium with 0.1 mg/L auxin were more productive and reached their highest amounts in combination with 2 mg/L RBAP (Table 2), followed by treatments with 1 mg/L RBAP, 2 mg/L BPA and 1 mg/L M-T. Exceptionally, higher auxin content (0.5 mg/L) in the medium yielded higher levels of protolithospermic acid isomers and salvianolic acid F isomers (Table 3).
In conclusion, substituted BAP derivatives, especially RBAP, significantly stimulated the biosynthesis of most polyphenolic compounds in S. bulleyana cultures, while BAP itself and K inhibited the polyphenol accumulation.

3.3. Establishment of Optimal Conditions Based on the Obtained Results

Despite clear answers in relation to the individual analyzed parameters, the final decision regarding the optimal medium for high productivity of S. bulleyana cultivation was difficult. The highest multiplication factor was obtained for explants grown on an MS medium with the addition of 0.1 mg/L IAA and 2 mg/L BPA, the highest increase in biomass was in the culture grown on the medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 1 mg/L M-T and the highest polyphenol content was seen in the shoots on the medium with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 2 mg/L RBAP. Varied responses are commonly reported with respect to plant growth and compound production. Such an effect was observed in the case of Colenonema pulchellum shoots, whose maximum regeneration was observed in the presence of 13.6 M TDZ, while the shoots growing in the presence of 13.3 M BAP had a higher content of total phenols and flavonoids [35]. Similarly, the multiplication ratio and the biomass of Knautia sarajevensis culture grown in the medium containing 2.0 mg/L zeatin was significantly higher than those observed for other treatments, but the highest content of total phenols was recorded for shoots cultivated in media containing 1.0 mg/L kinetin, followed by 2.0 mg/L BAP [36].
Due to the lack of a clear conclusion regarding the optimal medium, the TOPSIS analysis was included in the present study. TOPSIS is an analytical multi-criteria decision-making technique that allows the selection of a preferred alternative that is closest to the positive ideal solution and furthest from the negative ideal solution [37]. This method has been used with a positive effect when selecting the media with different sucrose and vitamin content for the hairy roots of S. bulleyana [21]. It can be especially helpful when comparing multiple variants when it is important to optimize several parameters.
The first step of this method is to select the parameters that need to be optimized. In the present study, four such factors were chosen: total phenolic acid content, RA level, dry biomass and proliferation ratio. The next step is to give weight to individual parameters. For the aim, which is the highest productivity of S. bulleyana shoot culture, we decided that the most important factors are the production of compounds (both all compounds and the dominant, biologically active RA) and the increase in total dry weight, because this parameter has a significant impact on the productivity. These factors received weights of 0.3. The multiplication factor received a lower weight of 0.1. Shoot proliferation ability is necessary to maintain the continuity of the culture, but not as important as the increase in biomass, which could result not only from the high multiplication factor but also from the growth of organs and tissues. This weighting of results is determined by the overriding study aim and would be estimated differently if that goal was to obtain as many new plants as possible, which is the case in horticulture.
After the calculations, the highest performance score was found for shoots grown on media with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 2 mg/L BPA or with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 1 mg/L M-T (0.76), and, hence, these media might be regarded as the most effective for high phenolic acid productivity in S. bulleyana culture (Table 4).
Thus, the final selection has been reduced to the two most effective treatments. The culture obtained on the medium with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 1 mg/L M-T demonstrated the highest dry weight, with quite high RA and TP content and quite favorable proliferation coefficient; in contrast, the treatment on the medium with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 2 mg/L BPA was characterized by the highest proliferation potential with effective RA and total polyphenol production and reasonable biomass accumulation.
A parameter that should be also taken into account is the price of individual growth regulators; this is notthe total cost of cultivation but also a factor that could affect the profitability of the culture. M-T is twice as cheap as BPA, 118.50 € and 543.4 € per gram, respectively (according to the price list as of 12 November 2022, of Duchefa Biochemie, BH Haarlem, The Netherlands). In addition, in selected media, M-T is used in half the concentration (1 mg/L) of BPA (2 mg/L). Therefore, an MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/L IAA and 1 mg/L M-T was ultimately selected as optimal for further experiments.

4. Conclusions

The present study reported an optimized propagation and growth protocol for S. bulleyana using shoot tip explants. Optimization of the type, concentration and combination of phytohormones is essential not only for successful shoot growth and multiplication but also for high bioactive compound production. The present study used the technique for order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) tool to determine the optimum method based on the wide range of considered parameters and the ambiguity of the results. Based on our findings, the substituted BAP derivatives have been found particularly advantageous for the accumulation of biomass and bioactive compounds in S. bulleyana cultures. The most efficient for phenolic acid accumulation in shoots turned out to be the MS medium containing 0.1 mg/L IAA and 1 mg/L M-T. Under these conditions, a highly productive culture yielded a phenolic acid content exceeding 28.4 mg/g dry weight within five weeks, which was 2.5 times higher than in the above-ground parts of two-year-old mother plants. Therefore, this culture can potentially be used for the production of medicinally relevant polyphenols.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.G.-K.; formal analysis, I.G.-K. and A.K.K.; investigation, I.G.-K., M.K., A.O.-J. and A.K.K.; writing—original draft preparation, I.G.-K.; writing—review and editing, I.G.-K., A.O.-J. and M.A.O.; visualization, I.G.-K.; supervision, I.G.-K.; project administration, I.G.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the Medical University of Lodz, grant Nos. 503/3-022-01/503-31-001 and 503/3-012-01/503-31-001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Monika Kowalska and Magdalena Miklaszewska for technical support in shoot proliferation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chandran, H.; Meena, M.; Barupal, T.; Sharma, K. Plant tissue culture as a perpetual source for production of industrially important bioactive compounds. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 26, e00450. [Google Scholar]
  2. Espinosa-Leal, C.A.; Puente-Garza, C.A.; García-Lara, S. In vitro plant tissue culture: Means for production of biological active compounds. Planta 2018, 248, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Murthy, H.N.; Lee, E.; Paek, K.Y. Production of secondary metabolites from cell and organ cultures: Strategies and approaches for biomass improvement and metabolite accumulation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 118, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  4. Agboola, D.A.; Ogunyale, O.G.; Fawibe, O.O.; Ajiboye, A.A. A review of plant growth substances: Their forms, structures, synthesis and functions. J. Adv. Lab. Res. Biol. 2014, 5, 152–168. [Google Scholar]
  5. Łuczkiewicz, M.; Kokotkiewicz, A.; Glod, D. Plant growth regulators affect biosynthesis and accumulation profile of isoflavone phytoestrogens in high-productive in vitro cultures of Genista tinctoria. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 118, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Aremu, A.O.; Bairu, M.W.; Szucova, L.; Dolezal, K.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Shoot and root proliferation in ‘Williams’ banana: Are the topolins better cytokinins? Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 111, 209–218. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kucharska, D.; Orlikowska, T.; Maciorowski, R.; Kunka, M.; Wójcik, D.; Pluta, S. Application of meta-Topolin for improving micropropagation of gooseberry (Ribes grossularia). Sci. Hortic. 2020, 272, 109529. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Ozcelik, B.; Altın, G.; Daşkaya-Dikmen, C.; Martorell, M.; Ramírez-Alarcón, K.; Alarcón-Zapata, P.; Morais-Braga, M.F.B.; Carneiro, J.N.; Leal, A.L.A.B.; et al. Salvia spp. plants-from farm to food applications and phytopharmacotherapy. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 80, 242–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, Y.B.; Ni, Z.Y.; Shi, Q.W.; Dong, M.; Kiyota, H.; Gu, Y.C.; Cong, B. Constituents from Salvia species and their biological activities. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5967–6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, J.; Wei, K.; Zhang, G.; Lei, L.; Yang, D.; Wang, W.; Han, Q.; Xia, Y.; Bi, Y.; Yang, M.; et al. Ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry, and pharmacology of Chinese Salvia species: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 225, 18–30. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, M.; Chen, J.; Peng, Y.; Wu, Q.; Xiao, P. Investigation of Danshen and related medicinal plants in China. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 120, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Krzemińska, M.; Kiss, A.K.; Olszewska, M.A.; Owczarek, A. Phytochemical profile and antioxidant activity of aerial and underground parts of Salvia bulleyana Diels. plants. Metabolites 2020, 10, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Hnatuszko-Konka, K.; Krzemińska, M.; Olszewska, M.A.; Owczarek, A. Cytokinin-based tissue cultures for stable medicinal plant production: Regeneration and phytochemical profiling of Salvia bulleyana shoots. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Makunga, N.P.; Van Staden, J. An efficient system for the production of clonal plantlets of the medicinally important aromatic plant: Salvia africana-lutea L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2008, 92, 63–72. [Google Scholar]
  15. Echeverrigaray, S.; Carrer, R.P.; Andrade, L. Micropropagation of Salvia guaranitica Benth through axillary shoot proliferation. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2010, 53, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gostin, I. Effects of different plant hormones on Salvia officinalis cultivated in vitro. Int. J. Bot. 2008, 4, 430–436. [Google Scholar]
  17. Assaf, M.; Korkmaz, A.; Karaman, Ş.; Kulak, M. Effect of plant growth regulators and salt stress on secondary metabolite composition in Lamiaceae species. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 144, 480–493. [Google Scholar]
  18. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wojciechowska, M.; Owczarek, A.; Kiss, A.K.; Grąbkowska, R.; Olszewska, M.A.; Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I. Establishment of hairy root cultures of Salvia bulleyana Diels for production of polyphenolic compounds. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 318, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Kuźma, Ł.; Skała, E.; Kiss, A.K. Hairy root cultures of Salvia viridis L. for production of polyphenolic compounds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 117, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Krzemińska, M.; Owczarek, A.; Olszewska, M.A.; Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I. In vitro strategy for the enhancement of the production of bioactive polyphenols in transformed roots of Salvia bulleyana. Int。 J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Petrova, L.; Nikolova, M.; Dimitrova, L.; Zayova, E. Micropropagation and evaluation of flavonoid content and antioxidant activity of Salvia officinalis L. Genet. Plant Physiol. 2015, 5, 48–60. [Google Scholar]
  23. Misic, D.; Grubisic, D.; Konjevic, R. Micropropagation of Salvia brachyodon through nodal explants. Biol. Plant. 2006, 50, 473–476. [Google Scholar]
  24. Arikat, N.A.; Fawzia, M.J.; Nabila, S.K.; Rida, A.S. Micropropagation and accumulation of essential oils in wild sage (Salvia fruticosa Mill.). Sci. Hortic. 2004, 100, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Molina, M.; Luis, A.; Luis, J.G. In vitro mass propagation of Salvia canariensis by axillary shoots. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 1997, 66, 351–354. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cuenca, S.; Amo-Marco, J.B. In vitro propagation of two Spanish endemic species of Salvia through bud proliferation. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2000, 36, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Hnatuszko-Konka, K.; Zarzycka, M.; Kuźma, Ł. The stimulatory effect of purine-type cytokinins on proliferation and polyphenolic compound accumulation in shoot culture of Salvia viridis. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Weremczuk-Jeżyna, I.; Skała, E.; Kuźma, Ł.; Kiss, A.K.; Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I. The effect of purine-type cytokinin on the proliferation and production of phenolic compounds in transformed shoots of Dracocephalum forrestii. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 306, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moyo, M.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Topolins in Pelargonium sidoides micropropagation: Do the new brooms really sweep cleaner? Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 110, 319–327. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gentile, A.; Jàquez, M.G.; Martinez, J.; Frattarelli, A.; Nota, P.; Caboni, E. Effect of meta-topolin on micropropagation and adventitious shoot regeneration in Prunus rootstocks. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 118, 373–381. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bairu, M.W.; Stirk, W.A.; Dolezal, K.; Van Staden, J. Optimizing the micropropagation protocol for the endangered Aloe polyphylla: Can meta-topolin and its derivatives serve as replacement for benzyladenine and zeatin? Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007, 90, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Van Staden, J.; Zazimalova, E.; George, E.F. Plant growth regulators II: Cytokinins, their analogues and antagonists. In Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture; George, E.F., Hall, M.A., De Klerk, G.J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 1, pp. 205–226. [Google Scholar]
  33. Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Kuźma, Ł.; Wysokińska, H. The effect of cytokinins on shoot proliferation, secondary metabolite production and antioxidant potential in shoot cultures of Scutellaria alpina. Plant. Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2015, 122, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Aremu, A.O.; Gruz, J.; Šubrtová, M.; Szüčová, L.; Doležal, K.; Bairu, M.W.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Antioxidant and phenolic acid profiles of tissue cultured and acclimatized Merwilla plumbea plantlets in relation to the applied cytokinins. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 1303–1308. [Google Scholar]
  35. Baskaran, P.; Moyo, M.; Van Staden, J. In vitro plant regeneration, phenolic compound production and pharmacological activities of Coleonema pulchellum. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 90, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Karalija, E.; Ćavar Zeljković, S.; Tarkowski, P.; Muratović, E.; Parić, A. The effect of cytokinins on growth, phenolics, antioxidant and antimicrobial potential in liquid agitated shoot cultures of Knautia sarajevensis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 131, 347–357. [Google Scholar]
  37. Uzun, B.; Taiwo, M.; Syidanova, A.; Uzun, D.O. The technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). In Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental and Civil Engineering; Ozsahin, D.U., Gökçekuş, H., Uzun, B., LaMoreaux, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 25–30. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on the proliferative response (%) of S. bulleyana culture. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on the proliferative response (%) of S. bulleyana culture. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 13 00227 g001
Figure 2. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on the proliferative coefficient of S. bulleyana culture. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on the proliferative coefficient of S. bulleyana culture. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 13 00227 g002
Figure 3. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on the length of S. bulleyana main shoot. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on the length of S. bulleyana main shoot. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 13 00227 g003
Figure 4. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on dry weight of S. bulleyana culture. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on dry weight of S. bulleyana culture. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 13 00227 g004
Figure 5. Representative UV chromatogram of the hydromethanolic extract of S. bulleyana shoot culture recorded by the UPLC- DAD/ESI-MS/MS system at 325 nm. Peak numbers correspond to the compound numbers in Table 1.
Figure 5. Representative UV chromatogram of the hydromethanolic extract of S. bulleyana shoot culture recorded by the UPLC- DAD/ESI-MS/MS system at 325 nm. Peak numbers correspond to the compound numbers in Table 1.
Biomolecules 13 00227 g005
Figure 6. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on total phenolic (TP) content in shoot culture of S. bulleyana. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Effect of cytokinin type (BAP, RBAP, BPA, M-T and K) and concentration (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L) on total phenolic (TP) content in shoot culture of S. bulleyana. Control (0)—shoots cultivated on MS medium only with auxin (IAA—0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L). The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 13 00227 g006
Table 1. Polyphenols of Salvia bulleyana shoot culture extracts detected by UPLC- DAD/ESI-MS/MS.
Table 1. Polyphenols of Salvia bulleyana shoot culture extracts detected by UPLC- DAD/ESI-MS/MS.
RtTentative Compound[M-H]-Fragmentation Ion
112.6Caffeoyl-threonic acid I (CTA I)297179, 161, 135
214.5Caffeoyl-threonic acid II (CTA II)297179, 161, 135
318.6Caffeic acid CA179135
420.1Caffeoyl-threonic acid III (CTA III)297179, 161, 135
524.2Protolithospermic acid isomer I (PLA I)357313, 269, 203
624.8Protolithospermic acid isomer II (PLA II)357313, 269, 203
731.5Rosmarinic acid hexoside (RAH)521359
836.5Rosmarinic acid (RA)359197, 179, 161
937.5Salvianolic acid K (SAK)555537,493, 359, 313, 269
1040.2Lithospermic acid isomer (LA)537493, 359
1141.6Dehydrorosmarinic acid (DRA)343325, 223, 197, 179, 135
1242.2Caffeic acid derivative (CAD)343181, 161
1343.5Methyl rosmarinate (MR)373179, 135
1450.8Salvianolic acid F isomer I (SAF I)313269, 161
1553.6Salvianolic acid F isomer II (SAF II)313269, 203, 161
Table 2. Phenolic compound content (mg/g dw) in shoot culture of S. bulleyana grown on MS medium with 0.1 mg/L IAA and different cytokinins at different concentrations.
Table 2. Phenolic compound content (mg/g dw) in shoot culture of S. bulleyana grown on MS medium with 0.1 mg/L IAA and different cytokinins at different concentrations.
Phytohormon combinationCompound [mg/g dw]
CTA ICTA IICACTA IIIPSL IPSL IIRAHRASAKLSDRA+CADRMSAF ISAF II
0tr0.29 ± 0.036cd0.28 ± 0.037ab0.176 ± 0.021e0.066 ± 0.008ef0.062 ± 0.007cd0.125 ± 0.018g16.76 ± 1.86e1.208 ± 0.16ab0.307 ± 0.039b0.144 ± 0.020d0.146 ± 0.017gh0.163 ± 0.021cd0.106 ± 0.012d
BAP 0.5tr0.036 ± 0.003h0.249 ± 0.017bc0.039 ± 0.003h0.214 ± 0.005b0.108 ± 0.010b0.023 ± 0.004i8.87 ± 0.74h0.481 ± 0.044htr0.062 ± 0.006g0.171 ± 0.022gf0.283 ± 0.014b0.190 ± 0.013b
BAP 1tr0.017 ± 0.001i0.15 ± 0.001h0.022 ± 0.001i0.128 ± 0.004c0.064 ± 0.001d0.023 ± 0.001i11.77 ± 0.30fg0.654 ± 0.027ftr0.094 ± 0.004e0.194 ± 0.008f0.14 ± 0.001d0.101 ± 0.001d
BAP 2tr0.05 ± 0.002g0.284 ± 0.001a0.044 ± 0.001h0.285 ± 0.001a0.210 ± 0.001atr8.24 ± 0.76h0.242 ± 0.020jtr0.064 ± 0.007g0.143 ± 0.029gh0.33 ± 0.008a0.238 ± 0.005a
RBAP 0.50.148 ± 0.002a0.485 ± 0.003a0.186 ± 0.001f0.371 ± 0.008atr0.049 ± 0.003e0.243 ± 0.007d25.82 ± 0.51d0.708 ± 0.025e0.122 ± 0.001e0.143 ± 0.003d0.262 ± 0.007d0.071 ± 0.001g0.046 ± 0.001g
RBAP 10.122 ± 0.007b0.418 ± 0.014b0.233 ± 0.006cd0.348 ± 0.029atr0.067 ± 0.001cd0.341 ± 0.032c29.58 ± 0.27b0.675 ± 0.191efg0.479 ± 0.095a0.23 ± 0.039b0.288 ± 0.034cd0.126 ± 0.013e0.094 ± 0.012de
RBAP 20.064 ± 0.001e0.304 ± 0.005c0.226 ± 0.006d0.254 ± 0.004btr0.064 ± 0.001d0.463 ± 0.014a33.67 ± 0.80a1.37 ± 0.037a0.415 ± 0.019a0.306 ± 0.008a0.348 ± 0.006b0.125 ± 0.001e0.095 ± 0.001e
BPA 0.50.077 ± 0.004d0.277 ± 0.014d0.187 ± 0.008f0.204 ± 0.006d0.028 ± 0.005g0.061 ± 0.006de0.187 ± 0.003f24.13 ± 0.96d0.962 ± 0.039b0.205 ± 0.033d0.183 ± 0.013c0.299 ± 0.012c0.090 ± 0.004f0.072 ± 0.006f
BPA 10.096 ± 0.002c0.313 ± 0.005c0.246 ± 0.004bc0.222 ± 0.001c0.131 ± 0.003c0.102 ± 0.001b0.199 ± 0.006e25.80 ± 0.4d0.801 ± 0.02d0.281 ± 0.005c0.209 ± 0.004b0.224 ± 0.002e0.151 ± 0.002c0.117 ± 0.002c
BPA 20.064 ± 0.005e0.218 ± 0.020e0.234 ± 0.013cd0.170 ± 0.009e0.062 ± 0.007f0.106 ± 0.004b0.218 ± 0.013e29.33 ± 0.73b0.615 ± 0.016fg0.339 ± 0.004b0.229 ± 0.04b0.404 ± 0.017a0.165 ± 0.009c0.124 ± 0.009c
M-T 0.50.073 ± 0.001d0.276 ± 0.002d0.18 ± 0.006f0.2 ± 0.002dtr0.054 ± 0.001e0.24 ± 0.003d27.19 ± 0.37bc1.02 ± 0.02b0.203 ± 0.006d0.15 ± 0.002d0.396 ± 0.008a0.074 ± 0.001g0.05 ± 0.003g
M-T 10.132 ± 0.005b0.423 ± 0.014b0.209 ± 0.003e0.348 ± 0.006a0.061 ± 0.001f0.093 ± 0.005b0.423 ± 0.002b25.38 ± 0.25d0.615 ± 0.008fg0.124 ± 0.002e0.1 ± 0.003e0.283 ± 0.003c0.105 ± 0.001f0.059 ± 0.001g
M-T 20.066 ± 0.002e0.236 ± 0.011e0.186 ± 0.005f0.182 ± 0.008e0.019 ± 0.002g0.071 ± 0.001c0.195 ± 0.009ef26.03 ± 0.78cd0.561 ± 0.011g0.138 ± 0.008e0.182 ± 0.004c0.389 ± 0.009a0.108 ± 0.005f0.069 ± 0.003f
K 0.50.025 ± 0.001f0.087 ± 0.002f0.156 ± 0.004h0.108 ± 0.001f0.070 ± 0.002e0.047 ± 0.002e0.042 ± 0.001h12.41 ± 0.1f0.745 ± 0.002e0.033 ± 0.001g0.103 ± 0.001e0.168 ± 0.002g0.147 ± 0.004cd0.093 ± 0.001e
K 10.012 ± 0.001g0.052 ± 0.002g0.166 ± 0.004g0.082 ± 0.003g0.099 ± 0.007d0.066 ± 0.002cd0.025 ± 0.003i10.71 ± 0.14g0.803 ± 0.007d0.039 ± 0.001g0.079 ± 0.005f0.134 ± 0.001h0.15 ± 0.005c0.107 ± 0.003d
K 20.014 ± 0.001g0.055 ± 0.001g0.166 ± 0.001g0.084 ± 0.001g0.071 ± 0.002e0.06 ± 0.001d0.041 ± 0.001h15.31 ± 0.03e0.868 ± 0.001c0.051 ± 0.001f0.15 ± 0.001d0.255 ± 0.004d0.146 ± 0.001cd0.092 ± 0.002e
The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter for the same metabolite were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05); tr-traces.
Table 3. Phenolic compound content (mg/g dw) in shoot culture of S. bulleyana grown on MS medium with 0.5 mg/L IAA and different cytokinins at different concentrations.
Table 3. Phenolic compound content (mg/g dw) in shoot culture of S. bulleyana grown on MS medium with 0.5 mg/L IAA and different cytokinins at different concentrations.
Phytohormon combinationCompound [mg/g dw]
CTA ICTA IICACTA IIIPSL IPSL IIRAHRASAKLSDRA+CADRMSAF ISAF II
00.045 ± 0.003e0.186 ± 0.013e0.179 ± 0.014fg0.113 ± 0.007g0.042 ± 0.003h0.040 ± 0.002i0.080 ± 0.007b10.76 ± 0.62c0.774 ± 0.06c0.197 ± 0.014a0.092 ± 0.008c0.094 ± 0.006h0.104 ± 0.008i0.068 ± 0.004i
BAP 0.5tr0.024 ± 0.002h0.255 ± 0.015d0.030 ± 0.002i0.272 ± 0.006ab0.15 ± 0.012bctr6.64 ± 0.55d0.367 ± 0.032ftr0.039 ± 0.002f0.081 ± 0.009h0.345 ± 0.027de0.239 ± 0.022f
BAP 1trtr0.152 ± 0.001g0.040 ± 0.001i0.119 ± 0.001e0.126 ± 0.002d0.030 ± 0.001d19.00 ± 0.09a0.899 ± 0.005btr0.165 ± 0.001b0.382 ± 0.002a0.130 ± 0.002h0.108 ± 0.001h
BAP 2tr0.033 ± 0.001g0.197 ± 0.005f0.075 ± 0.002h0.083 ± 0.003g0.110 ± 0.005e0.044 ± 0.001c17.83 ± 0.39a0.979 ± 0.017a0.055 ± 0.002d0.198 ± 0.005a0.325 ± 0.01b0.210 ± 0.009g0.57 ± 0.009a
RBAP 0.50.103 ± 0.001b0.327 ± 0.001b0.572 ± 0.019a0.205 ± 0.013c0.278 ± 0.011a0.185 ± 0.025b0.161 ± 0.001a18.02 ± 0.44a0.809 ± 0.158abc0.07 ± 0.003c0.173 ± 0.019ab0.206 ± 0.024ef0.614 ± 0.069a0.343 ± 0.057cd
RBAP 10.126 ± 0.011ab0.372 ± 0.034ab0.536 ± 0.009a0.295 ± 0.023ab0.287 ± 0.005a0.135 ± 0.006d0.076 ± 0.001b18.70 ± 0.08a0.196 ± 0.01htr0.092 ± 0.007c0.233 ± 0.019de0.401 ± 0.025c0.18 ± 0.026fg
RBAP 20.058 ± 0.003d0.189 ± 0.011e0.581 ± 0.029a0.142 ± 0.01f0.265 ± 0.026ab0.283 ± 0.015a0.049 ± 0.004c18.84 ± 0.87a0.568 ± 0.016e0.085 ± 0.004b0.188 ± 0.012a0.252 ± 0.018de0.676 ± 0.026a0.429 ± 0.021b
BPA 0.50.14 ± 0.024a0.457 ± 0.054a0.395 ± 0.034b0.314 ± 0.015a0.293 ± 0.035ab0.176 ± 0.015b0.076 ± 0.001b19.61 ± 2.18ab0.166 ± 0.005i0.039 ± 0.016d0.027 ± 0.008g0.148 ± 0.033g0.488 ± 0.03b0.333 ± 0.023c
BPA 10.142 ± 0.012a0.436 ± 0.037a0.323 ± 0.032bc0.261 ± 0.018b0.277 ± 0.026ab0.142 ± 0.014bcd0.029 ± 0.002d17.07 ± 1.17ab0.114 ± 0.013jtr0.055 ± 0.009e0.143 ± 0.012g0.409 ± 0.036c0.276 ± 0.022de
BPA 20.079 ± 0.003c0.29 ± 0.011c0.294 ± 0.009c0.205 ± 0.008c0.166 ± 0.007d0.125 ± 0.007d0.056 ± 0.002c20.74 ± 0.88a0.374 ± 0.019f0.058 ± 0.011d0.085 ± 0.024cd0.18 ± 0.014f0.305 ± 0.008e0.201 ± 0.007f
M-T 0.50.065 ± 0.001d0.221 ± 0.003d0.306 ± 0.001c0.162 ± 0.001e0.097 ± 0.005f0.102 ± 0.001e0.04 ± 0.001c16.71 ± 0.05ab0.26 ± 0.002g0.02 ± 0.001e0.072 ± 0.001d0.285 ± 0.001c0.382 ± 0.002c0.282 ± 0.003d
M-T 10.085 ± 0.003c0.279 ± 0.007c0.206 ± 0.001e0.215 ± 0.001c0.043 ± 0.008h0.076 ± 0.001g0.05 ± 0.001c15.86 ± 0.04b0.204 ± 0.004htr0.024 ± 0.001g0.212 ± 0.01e0.191 ± 0.006g0.11 ± 0.001h
M-T 20.068 ± 0.002d0.215 ± 0.008d0.229 ± 0.003d0.178 ± 0.005d0.098 ± 0.001f0.062 ± 0.001h0.033 ± 0.002d14.59 ± 0.11b0.243 ± 0.004gtr0.047 ± 0.002f0.255 ± 0.003d0.233 ± 0.003f0.146 ± 0.001g
K 0.50.015 ± 0.001f0.063 ± 0.002f0.213 ± 0.004e0.074 ± 0.001h0.115 ± 0.005e0.09 ± 0.001f0.033 ± 0.001d11.07 ± 0.05c0.644 ± 0.004d0.044 ± 0.004d0.074 ± 0.001d0.171 ± 0.007f0.187 ± 0.012g0.141 ± 0.005g
K 1trtr0.285 ± 0.009ctr0.209 ± 0.002c0.157 ± 0.002ctr6.15 ± 0.80d0.701 ± 0.098dtr0.056 ± 0.011e0.127 ± 0.009g0.356 ± 0.001d0.296 ± 0.002c
K 2trtr0.289 ± 0.005ctr0.255 ± 0.001b0.153 ± 0.001ctr5.14 ± 0.12d0.53 ± 0.011etr0.078 ± 0.005cd0.101 ± 0.007h0.365 ± 0.001d0.307 ± 0.002c
The values represent the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. Means marked with the same letter for the same metabolite were not significantly different, according to the ANOVA test followed by the post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparison (p < 0.05); tr-traces.
Table 4. Calculation of performance score for individual treatments using TOPSIS.
Table 4. Calculation of performance score for individual treatments using TOPSIS.
Performance ScoreIAA 0.1 g/LIAA 0.5 mg/L
00.3460.162
BAP 0.50.2390.205
BAP 10.3080.421
BAP 20.2950.365
RBAP 0.50.6370.425
RBAP 10.6730.509
RBAP 20.6410.548
BPA 0.50.5890.487
BPA 10.7000.436
BPA 20.7640.542
M-T 0.50.6630.380
M-T 10.7630.386
M-T 20.7580.386
K 0.50.1860.160
K 10.1000.056
K 20.1950.065
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Krzemińska, M.; Kiss, A.K.; Owczarek-Januszkiewicz, A.; Olszewska, M.A. Role of Phytohormones in Biomass and Polyphenol Accumulation in Salvia bulleyana In Vitro Culture. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020227

AMA Style

Grzegorczyk-Karolak I, Krzemińska M, Kiss AK, Owczarek-Januszkiewicz A, Olszewska MA. Role of Phytohormones in Biomass and Polyphenol Accumulation in Salvia bulleyana In Vitro Culture. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(2):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grzegorczyk-Karolak, Izabela, Marta Krzemińska, Anna K. Kiss, Aleksandra Owczarek-Januszkiewicz, and Monika A. Olszewska. 2023. "Role of Phytohormones in Biomass and Polyphenol Accumulation in Salvia bulleyana In Vitro Culture" Biomolecules 13, no. 2: 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop