Next Article in Journal
Cardiovascular Disease as a Consequence or a Cause of Cancer: Potential Role of Extracellular Vesicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Evolution and Role of Proteases in Campylobacter jejuni Lifestyle and Pathogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
Cholesterol and Sphingomyelin Polarize at the Leading Edge of Migrating Myoblasts and Involve Their Clustering in Submicrometric Domains
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Missing Pieces: The Role of Secretion Systems in Campylobacter jejuni Virulence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/biom13020320
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Therapeutic Oral Application of Carvacrol Alleviates Acute Campylobacteriosis in Mice Harboring a Human Gut Microbiota

by
Minnja S. Foote
,
Ke Du
,
Soraya Mousavi
,
Stefan Bereswill
† and
Markus M. Heimesaat
*,†
Gastrointestinal Microbiology Research Group, Institute of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, 12203 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(2), 320; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020320
Submission received: 13 January 2023 / Revised: 5 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Targets in Campylobacter Infections)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Human Campylobacter jejuni infections are rising globally. Since antibiotics are usually not indicated in acute campylobacteriosis, antibiotic-independent intervention measures are desirable. The phenolic compound carvacrol constitutes a promising candidate molecule given its antimicrobial and immune-modulatory features. To test the disease-alleviating effects of oral carvacrol treatment in acute murine campylobacteriosis, IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni and treated with carvacrol via the drinking water. Whereas C. jejuni stably established in the gastrointestinal tract of mice from the placebo cohort, carvacrol treatment resulted in lower pathogen loads in the small intestines on day 6 post infection. When compared to placebo, carvacrol ameliorated pathogen-induced symptoms including bloody diarrhea that was accompanied by less distinct histopathological and apoptotic cell responses in the colon. Furthermore, innate and adaptive immune cell numbers were lower in the colon of carvacrol- versus placebo-treated mice. Notably, carvacrol application dampened C. jejuni-induced secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators in intestinal, extra-intestinal and systemic organs to naive levels and furthermore, resulted in distinct shifts in the fecal microbiota composition. In conclusion, our preclinical placebo-controlled intervention study provides evidence that therapeutic carvacrol application constitutes a promising option to alleviate campylobacteriosis in the infected vertebrate host.

1. Introduction

With over 120,000 cases in the European Union in 2020, infections with the enteropathogen Campylobacter jejuni are the most frequently reported bacterial cause of foodborne illness and come with significant socioeconomic costs [1]. Enteropathogenic transmission to humans is most commonly linked to the consumption of contaminated food of animal origin such as raw and undercooked meat products from livestock, including poultry, and in other cases, to the ingestion of contaminated surface water and unpasteurized dairy products [2,3,4]. Following gastric and duodenal passage, the motile Gram-negative bacteria adhere to intestinal epithelial cells, migrate into subepithelial tissues, and induce innate as well as adaptive immune responses via Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4)-mediated sensing of the bacterial lipo-oligosaccharide (LOS) located on the surface of C. jejuni [5,6,7,8]. Immune cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes, as well as T lymphocytes and B cells infiltrate the colonic mucosa and lamina propria [4,8], causing a release of pro-inflammatory mediators in the intestinal tract, disrupting the epithelial barrier function which in turn, results in an malabsorptive syndrome [9,10].
C. jejuni-infected humans complain about gastroenteritis with diverse clinical manifestations, ranging from mild clinical signs to severe symptoms characterized by fever, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and watery or even bloody diarrhea [11,12]. The symptoms usually resolve within two weeks post infection (p.i.), and the majority of patients only need supportive treatment such as fluid and electrolyte replacement and application of analgesics with no indication for antibiotic treatment [4,12]. In other, but rare cases, the intestinal colonization of C. jejuni can induce rather severe or even systemic infections, particularly in comorbid and immune-compromised patients, which might require antibiotic therapy [13]. Inadequate use and ineffective control of antibiotic intervention measures in livestock and humans have contributed significantly to the selection of resistant bacterial strains to date [14,15]. Campylobacter strains have become increasingly resistant to antibiotics including first-line compounds such as fluoroquinolones and macrolides [14]. The worldwide spread of antibiotic resistance, not only in Campylobacter, has imposed serious challenges on global healthcare and food safety, and is now regarded as a critical One Health issue [16]. The One Health concept aims to balance and enhance the interdependent health of humans, animals and ecosystems in order to promote global health and address uprising challenges such as antibiotic resistance and foodborne diseases [17]. According to the One Health approach, multi-sectoral (i.e., humans, animals, and the associated environments) and inter-disciplinary (i.e., human and veterinary medicine) strategies are essential to address antibiotic resistance and their collateral damages [16]. As a consequence, generating pharmaceutical intervention strategies for prophylaxis and treatment of human campylobacteriosis with antibiotic-independent compounds as well as finding alternative measures to control antibiotic resistance not only in the human host but also in the animal reservoirs are appreciable and would contribute to safer food chains and lower pathogen-induced morbidities.
Due to the large biological and structural diversity of their components, plants provide a unique and renewable source of new, efficient, and easily applicable antibacterial compounds [18]. Terpenoids, for instance, constitute plant-derived molecules that have been reported to show potent anti-microbial activity against numerous microorganisms [19,20]. The monoterpenoid carvacrol is present as an essential oil in aromatic plants such as thyme, oregano, and wild bergamot [21]. Numerous studies have evaluated the immune-modulatory, anti-inflammatory, and anti-microbial activities of carvacrol. In vitro studies of the phenolic compound revealed anti-bacterial activities against a multitude of Gram-positive (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes) and Gram-negative (e.g., Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) bacterial species [22,23,24]. In addition, carvacrol was proven to inhibit biofilm development of several bacterial pathogens including S. aureus, E. coli, and C. jejuni, respectively [25,26,27]. Furthermore, in bacteriostatic concentrations, carvacrol was found to be responsible for damage to bacterial cell walls through the alteration of fatty acid compositions [28]. In vitro studies also showed that in bactericidal concentrations, carvacrol causes the disintegration of the outer membrane and disruption of the cytoplasmic membrane of Gram-negative bacteria [29]. Moreover, the phenolic compound acts as a proton exchanger, reducing the pH gradient across the cytoplasmic membrane, which leads to a failure of the proton-motive force, depletion of the adenosine triphosphate pool, and eventually to cell death [22,30]. According to in vitro and in vivo studies, carvacrol application led to a reduction in C. jejuni loads in intestinal samples derived from chicken [31,32] as well as to a reduced virulence gene expression and invasion of C. jejuni into chicken cells [33]. Furthermore, application of the synthetic compound caused an inhibition of motility and invasive features of C. jejuni in vitro [34]. These findings suggest carvacrol as a promising natural target molecule against C. jejuni-induced enterocolitis, but studies addressing the therapeutic effects of carvacrol in acute campylobacteriosis are rather scarce.
In the past, analyses of C. jejuni–host interactions were limited by a lack of reliable in vivo models. Due to their gut microbiota composition, conventional laboratory mice exert a strong colonization resistance against C. jejuni [35,36]. Upon microbiota depletion following the application of broad-spectrum antibiotics, secondary abiotic mice can be stably colonized by the pathogen following oral challenge [35,36,37]. However, characteristic clinical signs of human campylobacteriosis mice are lacking in C. jejuni-infected secondary abiotic wildtype mice [37]. One needs to take into consideration that rodents are approximately 10,000-fold more resistant against bacterial lipo-polysaccharide (LPS) and LOS expressed on the surface of C. jejuni as compared to humans [38]. Given that interleukin-10 (IL-10) is required for resistance against LOS [39], mice can be rendered susceptible to C. jejuni LOS by deletion of the murine il-10 gene [8]. Therefore, secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice display C. jejuni-induced acute enterocolitis within a week p.i. and display severe episodes of human campylobacteriosis [40]. This acute C. jejuni infection and inflammation model has been proven to be suitable for testing distinct compounds such as rapamycin (sirolimus) [41], activated charcoal [42], various essential oils [43,44,45], urolithin-A [46], vitamin C [47], and vitamin D [48] regarding their anti-pathogenic and immune-modulatory properties in preclinical intervention studies.
Previous studies also revealed that host susceptibility for and resistance against distinct enteropathogens including C. jejuni [49], Campylobacter coli [50], and Salmonella enterica [51] are determined by the host-specific intestinal microbiota. In order to elucidate the triangular relationship between enteropathogens on one side and immunity and the human gut microbiota on the other (host) side, we here tested carvacrol in IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota by subjecting secondary abiotic mice to oral transplantation of a fecal microbiota from human donors. Human-microbiota-associated mice not only harbor the pathogen in their intestines at high loads, but also present key symptoms of acute campylobacteriosis, suggesting that human fecal microbiota transplantation (hFMT) in mice may be well suited to further examine the molecular mechanisms underlying pathogen–commensal microbiota–host interactions [52].
In a recent study, we were able to show that an oral challenge of secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice with carvacrol in a prophylactic regimen starting four days prior C. jejuni infection resulted in lowered intestinal pathogen loads and alleviated symptoms of acute campylobacteriosis [53]. These results prompted us to test whether therapeutic oral carvacrol application to human-gut-microbiota-associated IL-10−/− mice starting two days after infection would exert immune-modulatory and/or anti-C. jejuni-directed effects and furthermore, affect the human gut microbiota composition.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Secondary Abiotic IL-10−/− Mice

In the Forschungsinstitute für Experimentelle Medizin, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany, IL-10−/− C57BL/6j mice were bred and reared under specified pathogen-free (SPF) and standard settings. Mice were housed in autoclaved cages with filter tops within an experimental semi-barrier and had free access to a standard chow diet (food pellets: ssniff R/M-H, V1534-300, Sniff, Soest, Germany) and autoclaved tap water. For a successful induction of intestinal C. jejuni colonization, 3-week-old female and male mice were subjected to an antibiotic regimen of ampicillin plus sulbactam (2 g/L; Dr. Friedrich Eberth Arzneimittel, Ursensollen, Germany) via the drinking water for eight weeks (ad libitum) in order to eradicate the murine intestinal microbiota (Figure 1) as described recently [54]. To ensure effective microbiota depletion, fecal samples were cultivated in enrichment broths as reported in detail [55]. All secondary abiotic mice were maintained and handled under aseptic conditions to avoid cross-contamination. Two days before hFMT the antibiotic treatment was withdrawn (Figure 1) and replaced by autoclaved water (ad libitum).

2.2. Human Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

In order to introduce a complex human intestinal microbiota into the murine host, the secondary abiotic mice received hFMT starting 1 week prior to C. jejuni infection on three consecutive days (i.e., on days −7, −6, and −5; Figure 1) as described in detail previously [37,52,56]. Therefore, human fecal samples collected from 5 healthy individuals (all samples free of enteropathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites) and aliquoted and stored at −80 °C were thawed, resuspended in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and pooled before oral application to mice via gavage (0.3 mL volume). The microbiota composition of the suspensions used for hFMT is shown in Supplemental Figure S1.

2.3. Campylobacter Jejuni Infection

Viable C. jejuni strain 81-176 bacteria stored at −80 °C were thawed, streaked out, and incubated on selective karmali agar plates (purchased from Oxoid, Wesel, Germany) at 37 °C for 48 h under micro-aerophilic conditions. In order to generate an inoculum of 109 bacterial cells, bacteria were harvested in sterile PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Age- and sex-matched human-gut-microbiota-associated IL-10−/− mice (3-month-old littermates) were then infected perorally with 109 colony forming units (CFU) of the pathogen on two consecutive days (i.e., on days 0 and 1; Figure 1) by gavage as stated in detail elsewhere [57].

2.4. Treatment Regimen

Oral carvacrol treatment via the drinking water was initiated two days after initial C. jejuni infection. Therefore, synthetic carvacrol (purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) was dissolved in Tween 80 (0.2% v/v) and added into autoclaved tap water to a final concentration of 500 mg/L (ad libitum) resulting in a daily dose of 100 mg per kg of body weight considering a body weight of approximately 25 g per mouse and a daily drinking volume of approximately 5 mL. The placebo control animals received a vehicle via the drinking water instead. Treatment solutions were changed every other day until the end of the experimental period (i.e., day 6 p.i.; Figure 1).

2.5. Gastrointestinal C. jejuni Loads

For the determination of gastrointestinal pathogen loads, the numbers of live C. jejuni bacteria after oral infection by gavage were monitored in fecal samples daily and upon necropsy in intraluminal gastrointestinal samples taken from the stomach, duodenum, ileum, and colon lumen that were subsequently homogenized in PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). C. jejuni was quantified by the counting of CFU after the growth of serial dilutions of intestinal samples on karmali agar for at least 48 h at 37 °C under micro-aerophilic conditions as described in detail previously [54]. The detection limit of viable pathogens was 100 CFU per g of fecal sample.

2.6. Gut Microbiota Composition

The microbiota composition of human fecal donor suspensions used for hFMT and of murine fecal samples of human-microbiota-associated mice was analyzed immediately before (i.e., day 0) and 6 days after C. jejuni infection as described in detail previously [55,58,59]. In brief, for cultural analyses, respective samples were homogenized in sterile PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and serial dilutions were streaked onto solid culture media and incubated under aerobic, micro-aerobic and anaerobic conditions for at least 48 h. Total bacterial loads and individual bacteria were enumerated and after subcultivation, species were identified according to their colony morphology, Gram-staining, biochemical analysis, and sequencing [55]. In addition, culture-independent 16s-rRNA-based methods were applied to confirm cultural results and furthermore, to quantitatively assess fastidious and even non-cultivable bacteria. Therefore, the total genomic DNA was extracted from respective samples and the main bacterial groups that are abundant in the human gut microbiota were determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction applying species-, genera- or group-specific 16S rRNA primers (Tib MolBiol, Berlin, Germany) and expressed as gene copies per ng of DNA [58,59].

2.7. Clinical Conditions of Mice

Immediately before and every day after C. jejuni infection, the clinical outcome of the mice was monitored quantitatively by using a cumulative clinical score (maximum 12 points), addressing the clinical aspects of the animals (i.e., wasting symptoms; 0: normal; 1: ruffled fur; 2: less locomotion; 3: isolation; 4: severely compromised locomotion, pre-final aspect), the occurrence of fecal blood (0: no blood; 2: microscopic detection of blood by the Guajac method using Haemoccult, Beckman Coulter/PCD, Germany; 4: macroscopic blood visible), and the stool consistency (0: formed feces; 2: pasty feces; 4: liquid feces), as stated elsewhere [60].

2.8. Sampling Procedures

At day 6 p.i., mice were sacrificed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation. Cardiac blood for cytokine measurements and ex vivo biopsies from liver, kidneys, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), and colon as well as luminal samples from stomach, duodenum, ileum, and colon were removed under aseptic conditions for microbiological, immunological, and immunohistopathological analyses.

2.9. Histopathology

For histopathological analyses, colon ex vivo biopsies were immediately fixed in 5% formalin, embedded in paraffin and 5 µm sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). In order to evaluate the severity of histopathological changes of the colonic mucosa, respective biopsies were assessed by light microscopy (100 × magnification) and quantitated by applying an established scoring scheme [61]: Score 1, minimal inflammatory cell infiltrates in the mucosa with intact epithelium; score 2, mild inflammatory cell infiltrates in the mucosa and submucosa with mild hyperplasia and mild goblet cell loss; score 3, moderate inflammatory cell infiltrates in the mucosa with moderate goblet cell loss; score 4, marked inflammatory cell infiltration into the mucosa and submucosa with marked goblet cell loss, multiple crypt abscesses, and crypt loss.

2.10. In Situ Immunohistochemistry

For in situ immunohistochemical analyses, colonic ex vivo biopsies were fixed in 5% formalin and embedded in paraffin as recently reported [62]. In brief, an independent investigator counted numbers of specifically stained cells by light microscopy in order to detect apoptotic epithelial cells, neutrophils, macrophages and monocytes, T lymphocytes, and regulatory T cells. Respective cells were counted in colonic paraffin sections (5 µm) stained with primary antibodies against cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA, 1:200), MPO7 (No. A0398, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark, 1:500), F4/80 (no. 14-4801, clone BM8, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA, 1:50), CD3 (no. N1580, Dako, 1:10), and FOXP3 (clone FJK-165, no. 14-5773, eBioscience, 1:100), respectively. The mean number of positively stained cells in each blinded sample was determined within at least six high-power fields (HPF, 0.287 mm2, 400 × magnification).

2.11. Pro-Inflammatory Mediators

Colonic samples (approximately 1 cm2) that were longitudinally cut and washed in sterile PBS and ex vivo biopsies derived from MLN (3 nodes), the liver (approximately 1 cm3), and the kidney (one half after the longitudinal cut) were transferred to 24 flat-bottom well culture plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing 500 µL serum-free RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), penicillin (100 µg/mL; Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), and streptomycin (100 µg/mL; Biochrom, Berlin, Germany). After an 18 h incubation period at 37 °C, respective culture supernatants and serum samples were tested for interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) by the Mouse Inflammation Cytometric Bead Assay (BD Biosciences, Germany) in a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Nitric oxide concentrations were determined with the Griess reaction [63].

2.12. Statistical Analyses

After pooling of data from three independent experiments, medians and significance levels were calculated using GraphPad Prism (version 9; San Diego, CA, USA). Applying the Anderson–Darling test, the normalization of data sets was surveyed. The Student’s t-test and Mann–Whitney test were used for pairwise comparisons of normally and not-normally distributed data, respectively. Multiple comparisons were performed using the one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-correction (for normally distributed data) and Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction (for not-normally distributed data). Two-sided probability (p) values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Gastrointestinal C. jejuni Colonization upon Carvacrol Treatment of Infected IL-10−/− Mice with a Human Gut Microbiota

We first addressed whether C. jejuni could stably establish in the intestinal tract of human-gut-microbiota-associated IL-10−/− mice following oral challenge and furthermore, whether carvacrol treatment starting on day 2 p.i. (Figure 1) would impact gastrointestinal pathogen loads. Our cultural analyses of fecal samples over time revealed comparably high C. jejuni cell numbers in both carvacrol- and placebo-treated mice from day 3 until day 6 p.i. (not significant (n.s.); Figure 2A). On the day of necropsy (i.e., day 6 p.i.) we further assessed enteropathogen loads alongside the gastrointestinal tract and detected approximately two orders of magnitude lower median luminal C. jejuni counts in proximal and distal parts of the small intestines such as the duodenum and terminal ileum, respectively, following carvacrol as compared to placebo treatment (p < 0.05–0.001; Figure 2B). In the stomach and the colon, however, the C. jejuni numbers were comparable on day 6 p.i. (n.s.; Figure 2B). Hence, C. jejuni could stably establish in the intestinal tract of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota, whereas carvacrol treatment resulted in lower enteropathogen loads in the small intestines.

3.2. Clinical Conditions over Time upon Carvacrol Treatment of Infected IL-10−/− Mice with a Human Gut Microbiota

We further surveyed the clinical signs of C. jejuni-induced disease such as wasting symptoms, stool consistency, and fecal blood following carvacrol treatment and applied a defined scoring scheme. As early as three days following the initiation of the oral challenge (i.e., day 5 p.i.), carvacrol-treated mice displayed lower total clinical scores when compared to their placebo counterparts (p < 0.01; Figure 3A). Whereas scores assessing wasting symptoms did not differ between respective cohorts (n.s.; Figure 3B), mice from the carvacrol treatment group exhibited lower scores for the abundance of blood in fecal samples when compared to placebo controls on days 3, 5, and 6 p.i. (p < 0.05–0.01; Figure 3C), which also held true for diarrheal scores on days 4, 5, and 6 p.i. (p < 0.05; Figure 3D). Hence, carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni-infected mice ameliorated pathogen-induced symptoms such as bloody diarrhea.

3.3. Microscopic Inflammatory Changes in the Colon upon Carvacrol Treatment of Infected IL-10−/− Mice with a Human Gut Microbiota

We next addressed whether the better macroscopic, i.e., clinical outcome upon carvacrol treatment was accompanied by less severe microscopic inflammatory sequelae of C. jejuni infection. Therefore, we quantitated histopathological changes in the colon by using a histopathological scoring scheme. On day 6 p.i., carvacrol-treated mice displayed less severe pathogen-induced histopathological cell damage in the colon when compared to placebo control animals as indicated by lower histopathological sores in the former versus the latter (p < 0.01; Figure 4A). In addition, we assessed the extent of C. jejuni-induced apoptotic cell responses in the colon of mice from respective treatment regimens on day 6 p.i. and found lower numbers of epithelial cells that were positive for cleaved caspase-3 in colon samples taken from carvacrol as compared to placebo-treated mice (p < 0.01; Figure 4B). Hence, carvacrol treatment ameliorated histopathological and apoptotic cell responses in the colon of C. jejuni-infected mice.

3.4. Immune Cell Responses in the Colon upon Carvacrol Treatment of Infected IL-10−/− Mice Harboring a Human Gut Microbiota

We then tested the impact of carvacrol treatment on C. jejuni-induced innate and adaptive immune responses in the colon. Our quantitative in situ immunohistochemical analyses revealed that numbers of innate immune cell subsets such as MPO7+ neutrophils and of F4/80+ macrophages and monocytes were lower in the colonic mucosa and lamina propria of carvacrol- as compared to placebo-treated mice on day 6 p.i. (p < 0.001; Figure 5A,B). Of note, colonic neutrophil numbers in carvacrol-treated infected mice did not differ from those found in naive animals (n.s.; Figure 5A). Furthermore, C. jejuni infection was accompanied by increases in adaptive immune cell populations including CD3+ T lymphocytes and FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (p < 0.01–0.001 versus naive; Figure 5C,D). The pathogen-induced increases in colonic T cell numbers were, however, less pronounced following carvacrol as compared to placebo treatment (p < 0.001; Figure 5C). Hence, carvacrol treatment resulted in less distinct innate and adaptive immune cell responses in the colon of C. jejuni-infected mice.

3.5. Intestinal Pro-Inflammatory Mediator Secretion upon Carvacrol Treatment of Infected IL-10−/− Mice Harboring a Human Gut Microbiota

We next tested the effects of carvacrol treatment on C. jejuni-induced pro-inflammatory mediator secretion in distinct intestinal compartments. On day 6 p.i., increased IFN-γ concentrations could be determined in ex vivo biopsies taken from the colon and MLN of placebo-, but not of carvacrol-treated mice, which also held true for nitric oxide levels measured in MLN (p < 0.05–0.001 versus naive; Figure 6). Hence, carvacrol treatment dampened C. jejuni-induced pro-inflammatory mediator responses in the intestinal tract to naive levels.

3.6. Extra-Intestinal and Systemic Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Secretion upon Carvacrol Treatment of Infected IL-10−/− Mice Harboring a Human Gut Microbiota

We further asked whether the inflammation-dampening effect of carvacrol was restricted to the intestinal tract or was also effective at extra-intestinal locations. In fact, increased IFN-γ concentrations could exclusively be measured in liver and kidney samples taken from placebo treated mice on day 6 p.i. (p < 0.01 versus naive; Figure 7), whereas respective cytokine concentrations did not differ in carvacrol-treated infected mice and naive counterparts (n.s.; Figure 7).
Strikingly, carvacrol also dampened the systemic pathogen-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine responses as indicated by IFN-γ and IL-6 concentrations, which were increased in serum samples derived from placebo-, but not carvacrol-treated mice on day 6 p.i. (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001 versus naive, respectively; Figure 8). Hence, therapeutic carvacrol application to C. jejuni-infected mice dampened not only intestinal, but also extra-intestinal and even systemic pathogen-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine responses.

3.7. Impact of Carvacrol Treatment on Fecal Microbiota Composition of Infected IL-10−/− Mice Harboring a Human Gut Microbiota

We finally addressed whether the gut microbiota of infected mice harboring a human gut microbiota differed upon carvacrol and placebo treatment during C. jejuni infection. Therefore, we performed a comprehensive gut microbiota analysis of fecal samples applying cultural as well as culture-independent analyses and found that immediately before C. jejuni infection (i.e., on day 0), the fecal microbiota composition did not differ between mice from both cohorts (n.s.; Supplemental Figure S2 and Figure 9). In the course of C. jejuni infection, however, the total bacterial and bifidobacterial loads decreased in fecal samples taken from placebo- as opposed to carvacrol-treated mice (p < 0.001; Supplemental Figure S2A; p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively; Figure 9A,H). Furthermore, lower fecal Bacteroides/Prevotella species and Clostridium/Eubacterium species including Clostridium coccoides and Clostridium leptum groups could be detected in mice from both cohorts on day 6 as compared to day 0 (p < 0.05–0.001; Supplemental Figure S2E,F and Figure 9E–G). Conversely, during C. jejuni infection, intestinal loads of enterobacteria and enterococci increased in carvacrol-, but not placebo-treated mice (p < 0.05–0.001; Supplemental Figure S2B,C and Figure 9B,C). At the end of the experiment, mice from the carvacrol cohort exhibited slightly higher total eubacterial bacterial loads in their feces when compared to their placebo counterparts (p < 0.01; Figure 9A), which also held true for higher bacterial cell counts and gene numbers of enterococci in the feces derived from the former versus the latter on day 6 p.i. (p < 0.01; Supplemental Figure S2C and Figure 9C). Hence, carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni-infected mice harboring a human gut microbiota was associated with distinct shifts in the fecal microbiota composition.

4. Discussion

In our present placebo-controlled intervention study, we tested the anti-pathogenic and immune-modulatory effects of synthetic carvacrol upon oral therapeutic application to C. jejuni-infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. Following carvacrol treatment starting two days p.i., human-gut-microbiota-associated IL-10−/− mice harbored up to two orders of magnitude lower C. jejuni loads in both the proximal and distal parts of the small intestines (i.e., the duodenum and ileum, respectively) compared to placebo control mice. In the colon, however, the C. jejuni numbers were comparable in mice from both cohorts. This is to some extent surprising given that the concentration of carvacrol applied via the drinking water was 500 mg/L, which is more than three times higher than the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 150 mg/L when tested against C. jejuni strain 81-176 in vitro [53]. One explanation could be that most of the compound was reabsorbed by enterocytes before reaching the colonic lumen. Furthermore, dilutional effects by intestinal fluids might have resulted in less pronounced anti-C. jejuni-directed effects. Interestingly, in our recent study, prophylactic application of carvacrol to secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice resulted in lower pathogen numbers in the ileum and colon, but neither in the stomach, nor the duodenum [53]. The abundance of the human gut microbiota leading to a different intraluminal milieu might be an additional factor explaining the different gastrointestinal C. jejuni loads.
Whereas placebo-treated human-gut-microbiota-associated IL-10−/− mice were suffering from severe campylobacteriosis, carvacrol treatment resulted in improved clinical conditions as early as 5 days p.i., particularly in less severe bloody diarrhea despite the high pathogenic burdens in the large intestines. It is tempting to speculate that these disease-alleviating effects might have been—at least in part—due to the down-regulatory effects of carvacrol on the expression of pathogenic virulence genes involved in motility, adhesion, and invasion as shown in several in vitro studies [25,33,64,65]. The improved clinical outcome was accompanied by less distinct microscopic inflammatory signs of C. jejuni infection such as histopathological changes of the large intestinal mucosa and colonic epithelial cell apoptosis. In line with these findings, a recent in vitro study revealed potent anti-apoptotic effects of synthetic carvacrol, given the reduced expression of the apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) upon treatment of cadmium-stimulated cells resulting in suppressed cleavage of caspase-3 [66]. Furthermore, carvacrol application could effectively down regulate the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) [66]. Interestingly, mTOR is the cellular target for the immune suppressor rapamycin (sirolimus) that has been shown to potently ameliorate acute campylobacteriosis in infected IL-10−/− mice [41]. Our results are supported by our previous study showing that prophylactic carvacrol treatment alleviated C. jejuni-induced symptoms of campylobacteriosis including wasting and bloody diarrhea as early as day 3 p.i. and moreover, reduced distinct C. jejuni-induced apoptosis in colonic epithelia [53]. Despite the shorter treatment period in our study, carvacrol could still effectively improve clinical outcomes upon C. jejuni infection.
Moreover, carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni-infected mice was accompanied by less distinct pro-inflammatory immune responses as indicated by less accumulation of innate and adaptive immune cell subsets such as macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, and T lymphocytes in the colonic mucosa. Notably, intestinal concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators such as IFN-γ and nitric oxide measured in carvacrol-treated, C. jejuni-infected mice were comparable to those detected in uninfected counterparts. These dampened pro-inflammatory immune responses resulted in diminishing oxidative stress to the intestinal epithelium, less pronounced histopathological and apoptotic colonic epithelial changes, and alleviated enteritis symptoms. In support of this, recent in vitro studies revealed that exogenous carvacrol exerted enhanced radical-scavenging activities [67] and led to diminished nitric oxide and IFN-γ secretion from stimulated macrophages and T lymphocytes, respectively [68,69]. Furthermore, the oral administration of carvacrol to LPS-challenged broiler chickens resulted in down-regulated intestinal expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [70]. Given that C. jejuni-induced enterocolitis is mainly due to TLR-4-mediated sensing of the pathogenic LOS, the TLR-4 antagonistic effects of carvacrol constitutes an important molecular mechanism underlying the disease-alleviating effects of the phenolic compound in campylobacteriosis. The anti-TLR-4 directed actions of carvacrol have been further demonstrated in various tissues such as stimulated cardiomyocytes [71], rheumatoid-arthritis-induced fibroblast-like synoviocytes [72], vascular endothelial cells [73], and brain neuronal cells [74].
Remarkably, the anti-inflammatory effects of exogenous carvacrol were not only restricted to the intestinal tract, but also affected extra-intestinal and even systemic tissue sites as indicated by attenuated secretion of cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-6 in liver, kidney, and serum samples taken from carvacrol-treated, infected mice. These results are in line with the findings of our recent study applying carvacrol to secondary abiotic IL-10−/− mice prior to C. jejuni infection [53]. Furthermore, carvacrol treatment of rats subjected to cadmium toxicity could alleviate oxidative stress and inflammation including apoptotic responses in affected liver and kidney tissues [75]. Of note, oral carvacrol application protected diabetic mice from liver injuries by down regulating not only the TLR-4 but also the mTOR signaling pathway [73]. The systemic anti-inflammatory effects of exogenous carvacrol observed in our current and previous study [53] are further underscored by a better survival of carvacrol-treated mice suffering from acute lung injury and LPS-induced endotoxinemia that was accompanied by diminished concentrations of IL-6 and myeloperoxidase derived from neutrophilic granulocytes [76].
The human-gut-microbiota-associated IL-10−/− mice applied in this study have been shown to present a reliable C. jejuni infection and inflammation model to dissect the interactions between the enteropathogen on one side, and of immunity and human gut microbiota on the host side [52]. As for every model, limitations must be taken into considerations. For instance, some species of the human microbiota might have been reduced or lost upon freezing, thawing, or further processing of the fecal donor samples [56]. Additionally, environmental factors such as housing conditions, diet, genetic background, and immunological status may impact the composition of the host-specific gut microbiota [56,77,78].
As confirmed by both culture and culture-independent analyses of fecal samples immediately before C. jejuni infection (i.e., on day 0), the gut microbiota compositions were comparable in mice from the carvacrol and the placebo cohorts, indicative of similarly effective engraftments following human FMT. At day 6 p.i., however, carvacrol-treated mice presented with slightly different fecal microbiota signatures characterized by higher numbers of total bacterial loads and enterococci when compared to their placebo counterparts. Furthermore, in the course of C. jejuni infection, the placebo- as opposed to carvacrol-treated mice experienced a significant (i.e., approximately 4 orders of magnitude) drop in fecal bifidobacteria from day 0 until day 6 p.i. In particular, the bifidobacterial species are known as important members of the commensal gut microbiota contributing to intestinal homeostasis due to short chain fatty acid production, for instance, and exerting probiotic health-promoting effects to the vertebrate host [79,80,81]. In line with this, carvacrol application to chicken broilers was shown to delay intestinal colonization with Campylobacter species due to changes in the commensal gut microbiota composition towards a higher abundance of distinct probiotic bacterial species [33]. Of note, carvacrol has been approved as an animal food supplement by the European Union in order to reduce the abundance of Campylobacter in livestock and meat production [82]. Furthermore, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has considered synthetic carvacrol as a safe chemical compound that is used as preservative in the food industry [83].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of our preclinical placebo-controlled intervention study provide evidence that the therapeutic application of carvacrol dampens intestinal and extra-intestinal inflammatory responses during acute campylobacteriosis in IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. Given the worldwide threat of antimicrobial resistance, this compound may be considered as a potent antibiotic-independent treatment option for acute campylobacteriosis in immune-compromised humans and, additionally, for the reduction in C. jejuni colonization in livestock, and may therefore improve food safety.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom13020320/s1, Figure S1: Microbiota composition of human fecal donor suspensions; Figure S2: Fecal microbiota changes upon carvacrol treatment of C. jejuni-infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota.

Author Contributions

M.S.F.: Performed experiments, analyzed data, wrote the paper. K.D.: Performed experiments, analyzed data, edited the paper. S.M.: Performed experiments, analyzed data, critically discussed results, edited the paper. S.B.: Provided advice in experimental design, critically discussed results, edited the paper. M.M.H.: Designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, co-wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the German Federal Ministries of Education and Research (BMBF) in frame of the zoonoses research consortium PAC-Campylobacter to MMH and SB (IP7/01KI1725D and 01KI2007D) and from the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy following a resolution of the German National Parliament, Deutscher Bundestag to MMH and SB (ZIM, ZF4117908 AJ8). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All mouse experiments were undertaken in adherence to the European animal welfare guidelines (2010/63/EU) after having obtained permission from the local commission for animal experiments (“Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales”, LaGeSo, Berlin; registration number G0104/19). The survey of clinical conditions of mice was performed daily.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding author provides data upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Alexandra Bittroff-Leben, Ines Puschendorf, Ulrike Fiebiger, Sumaya Abdul-Rahman, Gernot Reifenberger, and the staff of the animal research facility at FEM of Charité—University Medicine Berlin for excellent technical assistance and animal breeding. We acknowledge financial support from the Open Access Publication Fund of Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, publication decision, or manuscript preparation.

References

  1. European Food Safety Authority; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union One Health 2019 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bronowski, C.; James, C.E.; Winstanley, C. Role of environmental survival in transmission of Campylobacter jejuni. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 356, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hermans, D.; Pasmans, F.; Messens, W.; Martel, A.; Van Immerseel, F.; Rasschaert, G.; Heyndrickx, M.; Van Deun, K.; Haesebrouck, F. Poultry as a host for the zoonotic pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Young, K.T.; Davis, L.M.; Dirita, V.J. Campylobacter jejuni: Molecular biology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 665–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mortensen, N.P.; Kuijf, M.L.; Ang, C.W.; Schiellerup, P.; Krogfelt, K.A.; Jacobs, B.C.; van Belkum, A.; Endtz, H.P.; Bergman, M.P. Sialylation of Campylobacter jejuni lipo-oligosaccharides is associated with severe gastro-enteritis and reactive arthritis. Microbes Infect. 2009, 11, 988–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Klove, S.; Genger, C.; Weschka, D.; Mousavi, S.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Toll-Like Receptor-4 Is Involved in Mediating Intestinal and Extra-Intestinal Inflammation in Campylobacter coli-Infected Secondary Abiotic IL-10−/− Mice. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cróinín, T.O.; Backert, S. Host epithelial cell invasion by Campylobacter jejuni: Trigger or zipper mechanism? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mousavi, S.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Novel Clinical Campylobacter jejuni Infection Models Based on Sensitization of Mice to Lipooligosaccharide, a Major Bacterial Factor Triggering Innate Immune Responses in Human Campylobacteriosis. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mousavi, S.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Murine Models for the Investigation of Colonization Resistance and Innate Immune Responses in Campylobacter Jejuni Infections. Curr. Top Microbiol. Immunol. 2021, 431, 233–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bücker, R.; Krug, S.M.; Moos, V.; Bojarski, C.; Schweiger, M.R.; Kerick, M.; Fromm, A.; Janßen, S.; Fromm, M.; Hering, N.A.; et al. Campylobacter jejuni impairs sodium transport and epithelial barrier function via cytokine release in human colon. Mucosal Immunol. 2018, 11, 474–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mortensen, N.; Jonasson, S.A.; Lavesson, I.V.; Emberland, K.E.; Litleskare, S.; Wensaas, K.A.; Rortveit, G.; Langeland, N.; Hanevik, K. Correction: Characteristics of hospitalized patients during a large waterborne outbreak of Campylobacter jejuni in Norway. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0259407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Backert, S.; Tegtmeyer, N.; Cróinín, T.Ó.; Boehm, M.; Heimesaat, M.M. Human campylobacteriosis. In Campylobacter; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  13. Heimesaat, M.M.; Backert, S.; Alter, T.; Bereswill, S. Human Campylobacteriosis-A Serious Infectious Threat in a One Health Perspective. Curr. Top Microbiol. Immunol. 2021, 431, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. European Food Safety Authority; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2019–2020. EFSA J. 2022, 20, e07209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. O’Neill, J. Antimicrobials in agriculture and the environment: Reducing unnecessary use and waste. Rev. Antimicrob. Resist. 2015, 1, 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  16. Robinson, T.P.; Bu, D.P.; Carrique-Mas, J.; Fevre, E.M.; Gilbert, M.; Grace, D.; Hay, S.I.; Jiwakanon, J.; Kakkar, M.; Kariuki, S.; et al. Antibiotic resistance is the quintessential One Health issue. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016, 110, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Anholt, M.; Barkema, H. What is One Health? Can. Vet. J. 2021, 62, 641–644. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sakkas, H.; Papadopoulou, C. Antimicrobial Activity of Basil, Oregano, and Thyme Essential Oils. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barbieri, R.; Coppo, E.; Marchese, A.; Daglia, M.; Sobarzo-Sanchez, E.; Nabavi, S.F.; Nabavi, S.M. Phytochemicals for human disease: An update on plant-derived compounds antibacterial activity. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 196, 44–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Griffin, S.G.; Wyllie, S.G.; Markham, J.L.; Leach, D.N. The role of structure and molecular properties of terpenoids in determining their antimicrobial activity. Flavour Fragr. J. 1999, 14, 322–332. [Google Scholar]
  21. Friedman, M. Chemistry and multibeneficial bioactivities of carvacrol (4-isopropyl-2-methylphenol), a component of essential oils produced by aromatic plants and spices. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 7652–7670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ultee, A.; Kets, E.P.; Smid, E.J. Mechanisms of action of carvacrol on the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 4606–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hasanvand, T.; Mohammadi, M.; Abdollahpour, F.; Kamarehie, B.; Jafari, A.; Ghaderpoori, A.; Karami, M.A. A comparative study on antibacterial activity of carvacrol and glutaraldehyde on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus isolates: An in vitro study. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2021, 19, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Friedman, M.; Henika, P.R.; Mandrell, R.E. Bactericidal activities of plant essential oils and some of their isolated constituents against Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 1545–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wagle, B.R.; Upadhyay, A.; Upadhyaya, I.; Shrestha, S.; Arsi, K.; Liyanage, R.; Venkitanarayanan, K.; Donoghue, D.J.; Donoghue, A.M. Trans-Cinnamaldehyde, Eugenol and Carvacrol Reduce Campylobacter jejuni Biofilms and Modulate Expression of Select Genes and Proteins. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.G.; Lee, J. Carvacrol-rich oregano oil and thymol-rich thyme red oil inhibit biofilm formation and the virulence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 1420–1428. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Knowles, J.; Roller, S.; Murray, D.B.; Naidu, A. Antimicrobial action of carvacrol at different stages of dual-species biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 797–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Di Pasqua, R.; Hoskins, N.; Betts, G.; Mauriello, G. Changes in membrane fatty acids composition of microbial cells induced by addiction of thymol, carvacrol, limonene, cinnamaldehyde, and eugenol in the growing media. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2745–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Helander, I.M.; Alakomi, H.-L.; Latva-Kala, K.; Mattila-Sandholm, T.; Pol, I.; Smid, E.J.; Gorris, L.G.; von Wright, A. Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on Gram-negative bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 3590–3595. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gill, A.O.; Holley, R.A. Disruption of Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and Lactobacillus sakei cellular membranes by plant oil aromatics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 108, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arsi, K.; Donoghue, A.; Venkitanarayanan, K.; Kollanoor-Johny, A.; Fanatico, A.; Blore, P.; Donoghue, D. The efficacy of the natural plant extracts, thymol and carvacrol against Campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens. J. Food Saf. 2014, 34, 321–325. [Google Scholar]
  32. Johny, A.K.; Darre, M.; Donoghue, A.; Donoghue, D.; Venkitanarayanan, K. Antibacterial effect of trans-cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, carvacrol, and thymol on Salmonella enteritidis and Campylobacter jejuni in chicken cecal contents in vitro. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2010, 19, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kelly, C.; Gundogdu, O.; Pircalabioru, G.; Cean, A.; Scates, P.; Linton, M.; Pinkerton, L.; Magowan, E.; Stef, L.; Simiz, E.; et al. The In Vitro and In Vivo Effect of Carvacrol in Preventing Campylobacter Infection, Colonization and in Improving Productivity of Chicken Broilers. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2017, 14, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wagle, B.R.; Donoghue, A.M.; Shrestha, S.; Upadhyaya, I.; Arsi, K.; Gupta, A.; Liyanage, R.; Rath, N.C.; Donoghue, D.J.; Upadhyay, A. Carvacrol attenuates Campylobacter jejuni colonization factors and proteome critical for persistence in the chicken gut. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 4566–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Masanta, W.O.; Heimesaat, M.M.; Bereswill, S.; Tareen, A.M.; Lugert, R.; Groß, U.; Zautner, A.E. Modification of intestinal microbiota and its consequences for innate immune response in the pathogenesis of campylobacteriosis. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013, 2013, 526860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fiebiger, U.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Dissecting the interplay between intestinal microbiota and host immunity in health and disease: Lessons learned from germfree and gnotobiotic animal models. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2016, 6, 253–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bereswill, S.; Fischer, A.; Plickert, R.; Haag, L.M.; Otto, B.; Kuhl, A.A.; Dasti, J.I.; Zautner, A.E.; Munoz, M.; Loddenkemper, C.; et al. Novel murine infection models provide deep insights into the “menage a trois” of Campylobacter jejuni, microbiota and host innate immunity. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ellström, P.; Hansson, I.; Nilsson, A.; Rautelin, H.; Olsson Engvall, E. Lipooligosaccharide locus classes and putative virulence genes among chicken and human Campylobacter jejuni isolates. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Robertson, S.A.; Care, A.S.; Skinner, R.J. Interleukin 10 regulates inflammatory cytokine synthesis to protect against lipopolysaccharide-induced abortion and fetal growth restriction in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 76, 738–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Haag, L.M.; Fischer, A.; Otto, B.; Plickert, R.; Kuhl, A.A.; Gobel, U.B.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Campylobacter jejuni induces acute enterocolitis in gnotobiotic IL-10−/− mice via Toll-like-receptor-2 and -4 signaling. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, X.; Threadgill, D.; Jobin, C. Campylobacter jejuni induces colitis through activation of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 86–95.e85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bereswill, S.; Mousavi, S.; Weschka, D.; Heimesaat, M.M. Disease-Alleviating Effects of Peroral Activated Charcoal Treatment in Acute Murine Campylobacteriosis. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Heimesaat, M.M.; Mousavi, S.; Weschka, D.; Bereswill, S. Garlic Essential Oil as Promising Option for the Treatment of Acute Campylobacteriosis-Results from a Preclinical Placebo-Controlled Intervention Study. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mousavi, S.; Weschka, D.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Immune-Modulatory Effects upon Oral Application of Cumin-Essential-Oil to Mice Suffering from Acute Campylobacteriosis. Pathogens 2021, 10, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bereswill, S.; Mousavi, S.; Weschka, D.; Buczkowski, A.; Schmidt, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Peroral Clove Essential Oil Treatment Ameliorates Acute Campylobacteriosis-Results from a Preclinical Murine Intervention Study. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mousavi, S.; Weschka, D.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Preclinical Evaluation of Oral Urolithin-A for the Treatment of Acute Campylobacteriosis in Campylobacter jejuni Infected Microbiota-Depleted IL-10−/− Mice. Pathogens 2020, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mousavi, S.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Immunomodulatory and Antimicrobial Effects of Vitamin C. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2019, 9, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lobo de Sá, F.D.; Backert, S.; Nattramilarasu, P.K.; Mousavi, S.; Sandle, G.I.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M.; Schulzke, J.D.; Bücker, R. Vitamin D Reverses Disruption of Gut Epithelial Barrier Function Caused by Campylobacter jejuni. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bereswill, S.; Plickert, R.; Fischer, A.; Kühl, A.A.; Loddenkemper, C.; Batra, A.; Siegmund, B.; Göbel, U.B.; Heimesaat, M.M. What you eat is what you get: Novel Campylobacter models in the quadrangle relationship between nutrition, obesity, microbiota and susceptibility to infection. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2011, 1, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Heimesaat, M.M.; Genger, C.; Klove, S.; Weschka, D.; Mousavi, S.; Bereswill, S. The Host-Specific Intestinal Microbiota Composition Impacts Campylobacter coli Infection in a Clinical Mouse Model of Campylobacteriosis. Pathogens 2020, 9, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chung, H.; Pamp, S.J.; Hill, J.A.; Surana, N.K.; Edelman, S.M.; Troy, E.B.; Reading, N.C.; Villablanca, E.J.; Wang, S.; Mora, J.R.; et al. Gut immune maturation depends on colonization with a host-specific microbiota. Cell 2012, 149, 1578–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shayya, N.W.; Foote, M.S.; Langfeld, L.Q.; Du, K.; Bandick, R.; Mousavi, S.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Human microbiota associated IL-10−/− mice: A valuable enterocolitis model to dissect the interactions of Campylobacter jejuni with host immunity and gut microbiota. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2023, 12, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mousavi, S.; Schmidt, A.M.; Escher, U.; Kittler, S.; Kehrenberg, C.; Thunhorst, E.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Carvacrol ameliorates acute campylobacteriosis in a clinical murine infection model. Gut Pathog. 2020, 12, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Heimesaat, M.M.; Mousavi, S.; Bandick, R.; Bereswill, S. Campylobacter jejuni infection induces acute enterocolitis in IL-10−/− mice pretreated with ampicillin plus sulbactam. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2022, 12, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Heimesaat, M.M.; Bereswill, S.; Fischer, A.; Fuchs, D.; Struck, D.; Niebergall, J.; Jahn, H.-K.; Dunay, I.R.; Moter, A.; Gescher, D.M. Gram-negative bacteria aggravate murine small intestinal Th1-type immunopathology following oral infection with Toxoplasma gondii. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 8785–8795. [Google Scholar]
  56. Von Klitzing, E.; Öz, F.; Ekmekciu, I.; Escher, U.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Comprehensive survey of intestinal microbiota changes in offspring of human microbiota associated mice. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 7, 65–75. [Google Scholar]
  57. Du, K.; Foote, M.S.; Mousavi, S.; Buczkowski, A.; Schmidt, S.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Less Pronounced Immunopathological Responses following Oral Butyrate Treatment of Campylobacter jejuni-Infected Mice. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rausch, S.; Held, J.; Fischer, A.; Heimesaat, M.M.; Kühl, A.A.; Bereswill, S.; Hartmann, S. Small intestinal nematode infection of mice is associated with increased enterobacterial loads alongside the intestinal tract. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Weschka, D.; Mousavi, S.; Biesemeier, N.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Survey of Pathogen-Lowering and Immuno-Modulatory Effects Upon Treatment of Campylobacter coli-Infected Secondary Abiotic IL-10−/− Mice with the Probiotic Formulation Aviguard(®). Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Heimesaat, M.M.; Alutis, M.; Grundmann, U.; Fischer, A.; Tegtmeyer, N.; Böhm, M.; Kühl, A.A.; Göbel, U.B.; Backert, S.; Bereswill, S. The role of serine protease HtrA in acute ulcerative enterocolitis and extra-intestinal immune responses during Campylobacter jejuni infection of gnotobiotic IL-10 deficient mice. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014, 4, 77. [Google Scholar]
  61. Erben, U.; Loddenkemper, C.; Doerfel, K.; Spieckermann, S.; Haller, D.; Heimesaat, M.M.; Zeitz, M.; Siegmund, B.; Kühl, A.A. A guide to histomorphological evaluation of intestinal inflammation in mouse models. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 4557. [Google Scholar]
  62. Heimesaat, M.M.; Giladi, E.; Kühl, A.A.; Bereswill, S.; Gozes, I. The octapetide NAP alleviates intestinal and extra-intestinal anti-inflammatory sequelae of acute experimental colitis. Peptides 2018, 101, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bryan, N.S.; Grisham, M.B. Methods to detect nitric oxide and its metabolites in biological samples. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Upadhyay, A.; Arsi, K.; Wagle, B.R.; Upadhyaya, I.; Shrestha, S.; Donoghue, A.M.; Donoghue, D.J. Trans-cinnamaldehyde, carvacrol, and eugenol reduce Campylobacter jejuni colonization factors and expression of virulence genes in vitro. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Van Alphen, L.B.; Burt, S.A.; Veenendaal, A.K.; Bleumink-Pluym, N.M.; van Putten, J.P. The natural antimicrobial carvacrol inhibits Campylobacter jejuni motility and infection of epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Banik, S.; Akter, M.; Corpus Bondad, S.E.; Saito, T.; Hosokawa, T.; Kurasaki, M. Carvacrol inhibits cadmium toxicity through combating against caspase dependent/independent apoptosis in PC12 cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 134, 110835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Guimarães, A.G.; Oliveira, G.F.; Melo, M.S.; Cavalcanti, S.C.; Antoniolli, A.R.; Bonjardim, L.R.; Silva, F.A.; Santos, J.P.A.; Rocha, R.F.; Moreira, J.C.F. Bioassay-guided evaluation of antioxidant and antinociceptive activities of carvacrol. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010, 107, 949–957. [Google Scholar]
  68. Somensi, N.; Rabelo, T.K.; Guimarães, A.G.; Quintans-Junior, L.J.; de Souza Araújo, A.A.; Moreira, J.C.F.; Gelain, D.P. Carvacrol suppresses LPS-induced pro-inflammatory activation in RAW 264.7 macrophages through ERK1/2 and NF-kB pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 75, 105743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Amirghofran, Z.; Ahmadi, H.; Karimi, M.H.; Kalantar, F.; Gholijani, N.; Malek-Hosseini, Z. In vitro inhibitory effects of thymol and carvacrol on dendritic cell activation and function. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Liu, S.; Song, M.; Yun, W.; Lee, J.; Kim, H.; Cho, J. Effect of carvacrol essential oils on immune response and inflammation-related genes expression in broilers challenged by lipopolysaccharide. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2026–2033. [Google Scholar]
  71. Marconi, G.D.; Della Rocca, Y.; Fonticoli, L.; Guarnieri, S.; Carradori, S.; Rajan, T.S.; Pizzicannella, J.; Diomede, F. The Beneficial Effect of Carvacrol in HL-1 Cardiomyocytes Treated with LPS-G: Anti-Inflammatory Pathway Investigations. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, Y.; Xu, J.z.; Gu, C.x.; Liu, G.l.; Tian, K. Carvacrol suppresses inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 8169–8176. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Zhao, W.; Deng, C.; Han, Q.; Xu, H.; Chen, Y. Carvacrol may alleviate vascular inflammation in diabetic db/db mice. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 46, 977–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lee, B.; Yeom, M.; Shim, I.; Lee, H.; Hahm, D.-h. Inhibitory effect of carvacrol on lipopolysaccharide-induced memory impairment in rats. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2020, 24, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Kandemir, F.M.; Caglayan, C.; Darendelioğlu, E.; Küçükler, S.; İzol, E.; Kandemir, Ö. Modulatory effects of carvacrol against cadmium-induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity by molecular targeting regulation. Life Sci. 2021, 277, 119610. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Feng, X.; Jia, A. Protective effect of carvacrol on acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in mice. Inflammation 2014, 37, 1091–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Nguyen, T.L.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Liston, A.; Raes, J. How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research? Dis. Model. Mech. 2015, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rangan, P.; Choi, I.; Wei, M.; Navarrete, G.; Guen, E.; Brandhorst, S.; Enyati, N.; Pasia, G.; Maesincee, D.; Ocon, V.; et al. Fasting-Mimicking Diet Modulates Microbiota and Promotes Intestinal Regeneration to Reduce Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathology. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 2704–2719.e2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tojo, R.; Suárez, A.; Clemente, M.G.; de los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Margolles, A.; Gueimonde, M.; Ruas-Madiedo, P. Intestinal microbiota in health and disease: Role of bifidobacteria in gut homeostasis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 15163–15176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Heimesaat, M.M.; Reifenberger, G.; Vicena, V.; Illes, A.; Horvath, G.; Tamas, A.; Fulop, B.D.; Bereswill, S.; Reglodi, D. Intestinal microbiota changes in mice lacking pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP)—bifidobacteria make the difference. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 7, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shang, J.; Yang, S.; Tang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Duan, B.; Meng, X. Bifidobacterium bifidum H3-R2 and its molecular communication within the context of ulcerative colitis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 11678–11688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (EFSA FEEDAP Panel); Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; Bastos, M.d.L.; Christensen, H.; Kouba, M.; Kos Durjava, M.; López-Alonso, M.; López Puente, S.; Marcon, F.; et al. Safety and efficacy of an essential oil of Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (Link) leetsw. for all poultry species. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05653. [Google Scholar]
  83. Suntres, Z.E.; Coccimiglio, J.; Alipour, M. The bioactivity and toxicological actions of carvacrol. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 304–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 13 00320 g001 550
Figure 1. Experimental design. Conventional IL-10−/− mice were treated with ampicillin plus sulbactam via the drinking water for eight weeks in order to deplete the commensal gut microbiota. Two days prior to fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy human donors, the antibiotic compound was replaced by autoclaved tap water. Seven days post oral human FMT on day (d) −7, d−6, and d−5, mice were perorally infected with C. jejuni on d0 and d+1 and treated with carvacrol via the drinking water from d+2 until the day of necropsy (i.e., d+6).
Figure 1. Experimental design. Conventional IL-10−/− mice were treated with ampicillin plus sulbactam via the drinking water for eight weeks in order to deplete the commensal gut microbiota. Two days prior to fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy human donors, the antibiotic compound was replaced by autoclaved tap water. Seven days post oral human FMT on day (d) −7, d−6, and d−5, mice were perorally infected with C. jejuni on d0 and d+1 and treated with carvacrol via the drinking water from d+2 until the day of necropsy (i.e., d+6).
Biomolecules 13 00320 g001
Biomolecules 13 00320 g002 550
Figure 2. Gastrointestinal C. jejuni colonization upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice with a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni strain 81-176 on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. (A) Fecal C. jejuni loads were determined by culture at defined time points p.i. as indicated. (B) Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., C. jejuni were cultured from distinct gastrointestinal locations. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of culture-positive mice out of the total cohort (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) determined by the Mann–Whitney test are shown.
Figure 2. Gastrointestinal C. jejuni colonization upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice with a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni strain 81-176 on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. (A) Fecal C. jejuni loads were determined by culture at defined time points p.i. as indicated. (B) Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., C. jejuni were cultured from distinct gastrointestinal locations. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of culture-positive mice out of the total cohort (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) determined by the Mann–Whitney test are shown.
Biomolecules 13 00320 g002
Biomolecules 13 00320 g003 550
Figure 3. Clinical conditions over time upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice with a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. The clinical conditions of mice were monitored and quantitated at defined time points p.i. by a clinical scoring scheme and expressed as (A) total clinical scores constituting the sum of the scores for (B) wasting symptoms, (C) fecal blood, and (D) diarrheal symptoms. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the Mann–Whitney test and the Student’s t-test are shown.
Figure 3. Clinical conditions over time upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice with a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. The clinical conditions of mice were monitored and quantitated at defined time points p.i. by a clinical scoring scheme and expressed as (A) total clinical scores constituting the sum of the scores for (B) wasting symptoms, (C) fecal blood, and (D) diarrheal symptoms. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the Mann–Whitney test and the Student’s t-test are shown.
Biomolecules 13 00320 g003
Biomolecules 13 00320 g004 550
Figure 4. Microscopic inflammatory changes in the colon upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice with a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., (A) histopathological changes were quantitated by histopathological scores. Moreover, (B) apoptotic epithelial cells were enumerated in caspase3-positive (Casp3+) colonic paraffin sections by light microscopy and the average numbers of positively stained cells out of six representative high-power fields (HPF, 400 × magnification) were determined. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown.
Figure 4. Microscopic inflammatory changes in the colon upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice with a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., (A) histopathological changes were quantitated by histopathological scores. Moreover, (B) apoptotic epithelial cells were enumerated in caspase3-positive (Casp3+) colonic paraffin sections by light microscopy and the average numbers of positively stained cells out of six representative high-power fields (HPF, 400 × magnification) were determined. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown.
Biomolecules 13 00320 g004
Biomolecules 13 00320 g005 550
Figure 5. Immune cell responses in the colon upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., distinct immune cell populations such as (A) neutrophils (MPO7+), (B) macrophages and monocytes (F4/80+), (C) T lymphocytes (CD3+), and (D) regulatory T cells (FOXP3+) were enumerated in colonic paraffin sections by light microscopy and the average numbers of positively stained cells out of six representative high-power fields (HPF, 400 × magnification) were determined. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the one-way ANOVA test with Tukey post-correction and the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown.
Figure 5. Immune cell responses in the colon upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., distinct immune cell populations such as (A) neutrophils (MPO7+), (B) macrophages and monocytes (F4/80+), (C) T lymphocytes (CD3+), and (D) regulatory T cells (FOXP3+) were enumerated in colonic paraffin sections by light microscopy and the average numbers of positively stained cells out of six representative high-power fields (HPF, 400 × magnification) were determined. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the one-way ANOVA test with Tukey post-correction and the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown.
Biomolecules 13 00320 g005
Biomolecules 13 00320 g006 550
Figure 6. Intestinal pro-inflammatory mediator secretion upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., IFN-γ concentrations were measured in ex vivo biopsies taken from the (A) colon and (B) mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and furthermore, (C) nitric oxide secretion was assessed in MLN. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown. Definite outliers were removed after being identified by the Grubb’s test (α = 0.05).
Figure 6. Intestinal pro-inflammatory mediator secretion upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., IFN-γ concentrations were measured in ex vivo biopsies taken from the (A) colon and (B) mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and furthermore, (C) nitric oxide secretion was assessed in MLN. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown. Definite outliers were removed after being identified by the Grubb’s test (α = 0.05).
Biomolecules 13 00320 g006
Biomolecules 13 00320 g007 550
Figure 7. Extra-intestinal and systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., IFN-γ concentrations were measured in ex vivo biopsies taken from the (A) liver and (B) kidneys. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown. A definite outlier was removed after being identified by the Grubb’s test (α = 0.05).
Figure 7. Extra-intestinal and systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., IFN-γ concentrations were measured in ex vivo biopsies taken from the (A) liver and (B) kidneys. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown. A definite outlier was removed after being identified by the Grubb’s test (α = 0.05).
Biomolecules 13 00320 g007
Biomolecules 13 00320 g008 550
Figure 8. Systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., (A) IFN-γ and (B) IL-6 concentrations were measured in serum samples. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown.
Figure 8. Systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Naive mice served as uninfected and untreated controls (white diamonds). Upon sacrifice on d6 p.i., (A) IFN-γ and (B) IL-6 concentrations were measured in serum samples. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown.
Biomolecules 13 00320 g008
Biomolecules 13 00320 g009 550
Figure 9. Fecal microbiota composition changes upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Before d0 and upon sacrifice 6 days after infection, the fecal microbiota composition was quantitatively surveyed applying culture-independent molecular methods, and the respective bacterial numbers were expressed as gene copies per ng of DNA. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown.
Figure 9. Fecal microbiota composition changes upon carvacrol treatment of infected IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota. IL-10−/− mice harboring a human gut microbiota were perorally infected with C. jejuni on day (d)0 and d1. Starting on d2 post infection (p.i.), mice were treated with either synthetic carvacrol (CARV, white circles) or placebo (PLC, grey circles) via the drinking water until d6 p.i. Before d0 and upon sacrifice 6 days after infection, the fecal microbiota composition was quantitatively surveyed applying culture-independent molecular methods, and the respective bacterial numbers were expressed as gene copies per ng of DNA. Data pooled from three experiments, medians, numbers of included mice (in parentheses), and significance levels (p values) as determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post-correction are shown.
Biomolecules 13 00320 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Foote, M.S.; Du, K.; Mousavi, S.; Bereswill, S.; Heimesaat, M.M. Therapeutic Oral Application of Carvacrol Alleviates Acute Campylobacteriosis in Mice Harboring a Human Gut Microbiota. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020320

AMA Style

Foote MS, Du K, Mousavi S, Bereswill S, Heimesaat MM. Therapeutic Oral Application of Carvacrol Alleviates Acute Campylobacteriosis in Mice Harboring a Human Gut Microbiota. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(2):320. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020320

Chicago/Turabian Style

Foote, Minnja S., Ke Du, Soraya Mousavi, Stefan Bereswill, and Markus M. Heimesaat. 2023. "Therapeutic Oral Application of Carvacrol Alleviates Acute Campylobacteriosis in Mice Harboring a Human Gut Microbiota" Biomolecules 13, no. 2: 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020320

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop