Next Article in Journal
Does Enhanced Structural Maturity of hiPSC-Cardiomyocytes Better for the Detection of Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity?
Next Article in Special Issue
New Anti-Hypoxic Metabolites from Co-Culture of Marine-Derived Fungi Aspergillus carneus KMM 4638 and Amphichorda sp. KMM 4639
Previous Article in Journal
Plasma Cytokeratin-18 Fragment Level Reflects the Metabolic Phenotype in Obesity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combined Radiomodifying Effect of Fucoidan from the Brown Alga Saccharina cichorioides and Pacificusoside D from the Starfish Solaster pacificus in the Model of 3D Melanoma Cells
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Phytoceramides from the Marine Sponge Monanchora clathrata: Structural Analysis and Cytoprotective Effects

Biomolecules 2023, 13(4), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13040677
by Elena A. Santalova *, Alexandra S. Kuzmich, Ekaterina A. Chingizova, Ekaterina S. Menchinskaya, Evgeny A. Pislyagin and Pavel S. Dmitrenok *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Biomolecules 2023, 13(4), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13040677
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 9 April 2023 / Accepted: 11 April 2023 / Published: 14 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Natural Compounds with Biomedical Potential 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled "Phytoceramides from the marine sponge Monanchora clathrata: Structural Analysis and Cytoprotective Effects" authored by Elena A. Santalova et al. presents interesting data on phytoceramides characterization and cytoprotective potential

The following modifications are recommended:

1.Reformulate the abstract to point out the novelty of the study (first study) and to include conclusions 

2. Reformulate the introduction to avoid word repetitions (ceramides/ceramid - lines 31-38), and to fit the manuscript structure - aim and novelty, while the parts that present results and conclusions (eg lines 75-79) should be inserted in abstract and conclusions sections 

3. Ethics Statement should be added for the use of sponge Monanchora clathrata

Author Response

Please, see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

It is a generally well-written manuscript, where the isolation and activity of phytoceramides is studied. Specifically, it indicates that 16 new (1b, 3a, 15

3c, 3d, 3f, 3g, 5c, 5d, 5f, 5g, 6b–g) compounds were elucidated. These new compounds are determined based on the fragmentation spectrum obtained in mass spectrometry. I would like to know if nuclear magnetic resonance is available for each of the new compounds mentioned above, since they do not appear in the supporting information. This would be a very solid analytical foundation for the manuscript.

Author Response

Please, see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This manuscript describes the comprehensive analysis of phytoceramides from the marine sponge Monanchora clathrate by structural characterization and bioactivity evaluation. The authors report 16 new and 12 known compounds. Their structures were impressively determined by applying a combination of chemical and instrumental methods including RP-HPLC, NMR, ESI-MS, ESI-MS/MS, and GC-MS. In addition, the authors showed that the cytotoxic effect of crambescidin 359 and cisplatin decreased after pre-incubation of MDA-MB-231 and HL-60 cells with the investigated phytoceramides. Also, phytoceramides decreased neurodegenerative effect and ROS (reactive oxygen species) formation induced by paraquat in neuroblastoma cells. In general, this is an excellent report of phytoceramides from sponges and deserve a publication in Biomolecules.

The only concern is that the authors should discuss what is reason for structure differences of phytoceramides isolated from the same the sponge M. clathrate of Philippine sample and the Australia waters.

Author Response

Please, see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop