Next Article in Journal
Cyanide and Cyanogenic Compounds—Toxicity, Molecular Targets, and Therapeutic Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Design, Synthesis, and Biological Activity Studies of 1,3-Selenazoles
Previous Article in Journal
How Does Physical Activity Modulate Hormone Responses?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in the Synthesis and Biological Applications of Enoxacin-Based Compounds

by
Garba Suleiman
1,
Nabil El Brahmi
1,
Gérald Guillaumet
1,2,* and
Saïd El Kazzouli
1,*
1
Euromed Research Center, School of Engineering in Biomedical and Biotechnology, Euromed University of Fes (UEMF), Fez 30000, Morocco
2
Institut de Chimie Organique et Analytique, Université d’Orléans, UMR CNRS 7311, BP 6759, CEDEX 2, 45067 Orléans, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2024, 14(11), 1419; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14111419
Submission received: 27 September 2024 / Revised: 21 October 2024 / Accepted: 5 November 2024 / Published: 7 November 2024

Abstract

:
A comprehensive review of advances in the synthesis and biological applications of enoxacin (1, referred to as ENX)-based compounds is presented. ENX, a second-generation fluoroquinolone (FQ), is a prominent 1,8-naphthyridine containing compounds studied in medicinal chemistry. Quinolones, a class of synthetic antibiotics, are crucial building blocks for designing multi-biological libraries due to their inhibitory properties against DNA replication. Chemical modifications at positions 3 and 7 of the quinolone structure can transform antibacterial FQs into anticancer analogs. ENX and its derivatives have been examined for various therapeutic applications, including anticancer, antiviral, and potential treatment against COVID-19. Several synthetic methodologies have been devised for the efficient and versatile synthesis of ENX and its derivatives. This review emphasizes all-inclusive developments in the synthesis of ENX derivatives, focusing on modifications at C3 (carboxylic acid, Part A), C7 (piperazinyl, Part B), and other modifications (Parts A and B). The reactions considered were chosen based on their reproducibility, ease of execution, accessibility, and the availability of the methodology reported in the literature. This review provides valuable insights into the medicinal properties of these compounds, highlighting their potential as therapeutic agents in various fields.

1. Introduction

Quinolones, a class of synthetic antibiotics, are widely recognized as crucial building blocks for designing multi-biological libraries [1,2]. Their inhibitory properties against DNA replication make them effective against various pathogens, including mycoplasma, bacteria, and protozoa [3,4,5]. These synthetic antibacterial drugs belong to the broader class of fluoroquinolones (FQs) and act by targeting DNA gyrase, topoisomerase enzymes, and topoisomerase IV, which are involved in DNA replication and repair processes in bacteria [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
The discovery of nalidixic acid in 1962 marked the beginning of the use of quinolone derivatives as antibacterial agents worldwide [13,14]. The subsequent development of FQs in the 1970s and the 1980s significantly expanded their coverage [15,16]. FQs exhibit diverse biological activities, including against infectious diseases such as malaria and parasitic, bacterial, and fungal diseases [3,17,18,19], as well as viral infections such as hepatitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and herpes [20]. They are highly effective against Gram-negative Pseudomonas infections and have been employed in treating pneumonia and intra-abdominal infections [21]. Additionally, they show promise in treating autoimmune diseases, organ transplantation, and rheumatoid arthritis with low toxicity [2,22,23,24]. FQs can impede tumor growth by inducing damage to type II human DNA topoisomerases, similar to specific chemotherapy drugs such as etoposide [25,26], making them noteworthy agents in infectious disease management and potential adjuncts in certain cancer treatment strategies.
The critical structural attributes of quinolones have been identified, with 4-oxo-quinolone-3-carboxylic acid being a significant substructure in numerous quinolone derivatives with outstanding biological activities [27,28]. Chemical modifications at position 7 transform antibacterial FQs into anticancer analogs, while the carboxylic group at position 3 plays a vital role in enzyme binding and functional group transformation, enhancing anticancer potential [27,29,30]. FQs such as levofloxacin and moxifloxacin are designated by the WHO as second-line drugs for treating tuberculosis due to their broad and potent spectrum of activities as well as oral administration [31,32,33]. The versatility of quinolones and FQs makes them valuable tools in medicinal research and therapeutic applications across different disciplines.
FQs with a 1,8-naphthyridine core are a specific subset of the fluoroquinolone class, where the quinolone nucleus is replaced by a naphthyridine structure. In the case of FQs with a 1,8-naphthyridine core, the compounds primarily differ at two key positions, N1 and C7, with modifications often occurring at C3 and C7. Figure 1 depicts the 1,8-naphthyridine core, clearly labeling N1 through N8 to emphasize these distinctions within the structure. To illustrate, enoxacin (1, referred to as ENX) is known for having a piperazinyl group at C7 and an ethyl group at N1. In contrast, gemifloxacin, while also featuring the 1,8-naphthyridine core, has an aminopyrrolidinyl group at C7 and a cyclopropyl group at N1. Other FQs with this core typically have a different group at the C7 and N1 positions, as illustrated in Figure 2.
In 1980, ENX, a 1,8-naphthyridine derivative of nalidixic acid, was discovered [34]. Although six distinct isomeric forms of naphthyridine exist, 1,8-naphthyridine derivatives have been extensively researched [35,36,37]. This unique skeleton has led to various bioactive compounds derived from natural sources, demonstrating significant biological applications [38,39,40]. ENX, a fluorinated antibacterial drug, and voreloxin, a non-fluorinated potential anticancer agent, are prominent 1,8-naphthyridines studied in medicinal chemistry [26,41]. Other important 1,8-naphthyridine-containing molecules with demonstrated biological activity include nalidixic acid, trovafloxacin, tosufloxacin, voreloxin, and gemifloxacin (Figure 2).
ENX, a second-generation fluoroquinolone, is known for its wide-spectrum antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [42,43,44]. Structurally, ENX comprises two fused six-membered rings with a 1,8-naphthyridine core as the parental structure (Figure 3) [45,46]. This drug is often well-tolerated and has a low frequency of side effects. It is typically delivered orally in the form of tablets. However, due to the development of resistance by many strains of bacteria, including Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), it is no longer considered a first-line treatment for bacterial infections [47]. Over the past few decades, scientists have examined the potential usage of ENX and its derivatives for several therapeutic applications [48,49,50]. In vitro tests have revealed that ENX exerts significant cytotoxicity in human cancer cells [48,51]. Moreover, it has also been reported to enhance the anticancer effects of other chemotherapeutic medications, including paclitaxel [51,52,53]. In addition, ENX possesses antiviral properties, making it effective against many different infections, including HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) [48,52].
A recent study on repositioning FQs demonstrated the potential of repurposing ENX for its use as a potential treatment against COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) [54,55,56]. Although there are many motives for reviewing the chemical synthesis of ENX and its derivatives, some of the critical reasons are selectivity [57], repositionability [51], oral bioavailability [58], a better safety profile, pro-oxidative activity, and regulation of microRNA biogenesis [59]. ENX ‘s unique microRNA-interfering activity sets it apart from other FQs and topoisomerase II drugs [45].
Several synthetic methodologies have been devised and implemented and are known for their efficiency, versatility, and convenience [1,60,61]. However, no exhaustive review has exclusively presented the synthesis of ENX and its derivatives based on the current literature and understanding [62]. In this review, we highlight key developments in the synthesis of 4-quinolone-3-carboxylic acid derivatives with a 1,8-naphthyridine core, specifically focusing on ENX, and discuss its medicinal properties where relevant. Recent publications have discussed the expanded therapeutic potential of diverse heterocyclic molecules beyond their conventional applications [63,64,65,66].
The present analysis is structured into three distinct segments: part A focuses on the modification of the carboxylic acid at the C3 position, part B addresses the modification of the piperazinyl group at the C7 position, and the section on other modifications explores combined modifications involving both parts A and B. The reactions considered in this review were chosen based on their capacity for reproducibility, relative ease of execution, accessibility, and the availability of the methodology as reported in the literature. Below is the structural representation of ENX with labeled atom positions comprising the C3-carboxylic part, the C7-piperazinyl part, and the fluoroquinolone core (Figure 3).

2. Modifications of ENX-Based Compounds

2.1. C3 Modification of ENX (Part A)

In 2009, You and colleagues [67] designed and synthesized a novel series of quinolone and naphthyridine derivatives as potential topoisomerase I inhibitors by modifying the scaffold in three steps. The first step involved condensation of ENX with 2 in polyphosphoric acid (PPA) at 170–250 °C to obtain 3ac or 4 (Table 1). In the subsequent step, intermediate 3ac was nitrated in a mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and nitric acid (HNO3) in an approximately equal ratio at 5 °C, followed by heating at 40–45 °C for 1–2 h, yielding 5ac. In the final step, the nitro-containing compound 5c was subjected to hydrogenation over Pd/C in 1 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution to produce 6 (Scheme 1). All derivatives containing three kinds of heterocycles, benzoxazole, benzimidazole, and benzothiazole, at the C3 position were screened in vitro for their antiproliferative effects against oral epidermal carcinoma (KB), ovarian carcinoma (A270), and hepatocellular carcinoma (Bel-7402) cells using a 1-N-methyl-5-thiotetrazole (MTT)-based assay (Table 1). In summary, the 3-benzothiazolenaphthyridine skeleton 3c showed the highest antiproliferative activity (IC50 = 2.4–2.7 μM) against three tumor cell lines. Conversely, nitro-containing 3-benzoxazolenaphthyridine scaffold 5b displayed even better cytotoxic activity (IC50 = 31.8–3.0 μM). Surprisingly, reducing the nitro group in 5a to 6 resulted in significantly diminished cytotoxicity. This reinforces the hypothesis that an electron-withdrawing group is essential for cytotoxic activity.
A few years later, Yang and coworkers [68] synthesized 1,8-naphthyridin-3-yl-1H-benzo-6-carbonitrile derivatives of ENX by replacing the carboxyl group at C3 with a 2,3-dihydro-1H-benzimidazole-5-carbonitrile system in a single step, employing the same procedure as described in Scheme 1 [67]. The target compound was realized by condensing ENX with 7 at 170–250 °C in PPA to yield product 8 (Scheme 2). Their studies were primarily centered around investigating the potential molecular mechanism by which it exhibits its antitumor activity against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The results revealed that compound 8 exhibited significantly stronger inhibitory effects against NSCLC compared to its leading compound ENX, both in cultured cells and in a xenograft mice model. It also increases reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and DNA damage response (DDR) in a dose-dependent manner. The ROS scavenger N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) reduced DDR and apoptosis triggered by 8, confirming that its antitumor actions are due to oxidative stress. Thus, 8 promotes oxidative stress and cell death by activating the mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathways [68].
In a study conducted by Arayne and colleagues [69], the synthesis of carboxy-substituted ENX analogs as antibacterial agents was documented. This synthesis involved the amidation of the 3-carboxylic acid group of ENX using aromatic amines (RNH2) and phenyl hydrazine. Initially, an ENX ester, 9, was prepared in methanol with a catalytic amount of H2SO4 at reflux for 7–8 h. The resulting intermediate 9 was further reacted with different aromatic amines, as well as phenyl hydrazine, under reflux for 2–3 h, yielding the desired carboxamides 10ad and the carbohydrazide 11 in moderate to good yields (Scheme 3). Compounds 10ad and 11 were tested against various bacteria, revealing remarkably improved antimicrobial effectiveness against Gram-negative strains. Furthermore, their potential to influence the immune response was assessed in a separate study [70]. To evaluate their immunomodulatory activity, the impact on the oxidative burst activity of phagocytes in whole blood, as well as macrophages and neutrophils, was investigated. Among the synthesized derivatives, compounds 10c and 10d exhibited the highest level of inhibition in whole blood (IC50 = 2.6 and 1.4 µg/mL), macrophages (IC50 = 3.2 and 1.4 µg/mL), and isolated neutrophils (IC50 = 0.8 and 1.4 µg/mL), respectively (Table 2).

2.2. C7 Modification of ENX (Part B)

According to the literature, C7 piperazinyl quinolone modifications are effective not only against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens [71] but also have numerous biological applications against cancer [72,73], inflammation [28], osteoclasts [74], viral infections [75], and other diseases [76,77]. As prospective osteo-adsorptive drugs, Herczegh and coworkers [78] developed a series of bisphosphonate FQ derivatives. The piperazinyl group of ENX was transformed with tetraethyl ethene-1,1-diylbis(phosphonate) 12. In the first step, ENX was combined with 12 in the presence of triethylamine (Et3N) in dichloromethane (DCM), under stirring at room temperature (rt), for 3 h. Afterwards, an aqueous work-up and recrystallization from toluene produced the bis-(diethoxy-phosphoryl)-ethyl ester 13. The ester was then hydrolyzed with bromotrimethylsilane (CH3)3SiBr in DCM at rt for 72 h, yielding 14 as a hydrobromide salt. Treatment of the salt with water (H2O) at rt for 6 h, followed by agitation in DCM and subsequent ether washing, resulted in an average yield of the desired compound, bis-phosphonic-ENX derivative 14 (Scheme 4).
In another study, Vracar and colleagues [79] discovered that ENX and bis-phosphonic-ENX, 14, have been found to induce the release of extracellular vesicles from 4T1 murine breast cancer cells, which possess inhibitory effects on osteoclastogenesis. Surprisingly, adding a bisphosphonate moiety boosted bone binding affinity. Moreover, bis-phosphonic-ENX, similar to ENX, displayed inhibitory effects on the binding of V-ATPase to microfilaments, as well as on bone resorption in vitro. In summary, bis-phosphonic-ENX offers multiple benefits beyond preventing bone mineral loss. It not only modifies the composition of bone glycoproteins, making them more resistant to fractures, but also completely suppresses osteoclast differentiation. Both ENX and bis-phosphonic-ENX demonstrate similar potency, with IC50 values around 10 µM, indicating their strong inhibitory effects on osteoclasts.
Darekhordi and colleagues [80] reported the synthesis of the medicinally important ENX derivative 16 under moderate conditions in a single-step approach. The synthesis involved reacting ENX with 15 using potassium carbonate (K2CO3) in dimethylformamide (DMF) at reflux for 24 h, yielding 16 in a reasonable yield (Scheme 5). In addition, the antibacterial efficacy of the synthesized conjugate was tested via the agar diffusion method and exhibited concentration-dependent improved activity against E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).
In their study, Xiao and colleagues [81] described the synthesis of FQ–flavonoid hybrids using a well-designed pharmacophore system, aiming to develop a multi-target bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor with potential as an efflux pump inhibitor. The synthesis involved the reaction of ENX with different flavonoids (17), such as apigenin and naringenin, while including an ethylene linker in the process (Scheme 6). In the initial step, 17ac was o-selectively alkylated with 1,2-dibromoethane in the presence of K2CO3 in DMSO at 70 °C for 15 h, yielding compounds 18ac. Then, compounds 18ac were reacted with ENX in DMSO in the presence of DMAP at 60 °C for 40–50 h, yielding FQ–flavonoid hybrids 19ac in reasonable yields (55–75%). The antibacterial efficacy of the hybrids was tested against different microorganisms, including Tetracycline-resistant Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 (B. subtilis), amphotericin B-resistant Candida albicans (C. albicans), multiple drug-resistant E. coli ATCC 35218, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus ATCC 25923. Some of these compounds displayed impressive antibacterial properties, particularly against drug-resistant strains. Remarkably, derivative 19a exhibited outstanding activity against B. subtilis and C. albicans with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.45 µg/mL and 2.60 µg/mL in comparison to the standard drug ciprofloxacin (CPX), which had MIC values of 2.70 µg/mL and 32.4 µg/mL for the respective microorganisms (Table 3).
A methylene-bridged nitrofuran N-substituted piperazinylquinolone was designed and synthesized by Emami and colleagues [82]. ENX mixed with 2-(bromomethyl)-5-nitrofuran 20 in DMF in the presence of sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3) as a base at rt for 120 h resulted in the formation of the desired compound 21 (Scheme 7) at a good yield (81%). The antibacterial assessment demonstrated that the efficacy of 7-piperazinylquinolones with (5-nitrofuran-2-yl) derivatives against diverse bacterial strains is contingent upon the nature of the substituents located at the N1 and C7 sites. Overall, the compound displayed noteworthy antibacterial efficacy against Staphylococci in a manner that was dependent on their concentration. Compound 21 showed the best inhibitory activity against S. aureus with a MIC of 0.39 μg/mL.
In another report [83], four novel ENX derivatives were synthesized by introducing 2-(5-chlorothiophen-2-yl)ethyl into the piperazine ring. The synthesis was performed by reacting ENX with intermediates 22ad in DMF at rt, employing NaHCO3 and yielding 23ad in 62–73% yields (Scheme 8). The introduction of 2-(5-chlorothiophen-2-yl)ethyl into the piperazine ring of ENX resulted in enhanced cytotoxicity against various cancer cell lines compared to the unmodified ENX [84]. Compound 23 exhibited varying modifications to the ethyl spacer structures. Regarding their cytotoxicity against cancer cell lines, including melanoma (SKMEL-3), breast (MCF-7), epidermoid (A431), bladder (EJ), colon (SW480), and KB cell lines, compounds 23b and 23c demonstrated the most significant impact. Specifically, 23b displayed an IC50 range of 3 to 10 μM, while 23c showed an IC50 range of 3 to 20 μM (Table 4). On the other hand, 23d exhibited IC50 values of 2 to 14 μM for melanoma, epidermoid, cervical, and bladder cell lines. In summary, incorporating the 2-(5-chlorothio-phen-2-yl)ethyl group into the piperazinyl portion of ENX enhanced its cytotoxic properties compared to the parent ENX, although the extent of improvement depended on the structure of the spacer. By introducing an additional functionality, the antitumor effectiveness rose considerably (Table 4).
Synthesis and pre-formulation studies were conducted on a pharmacologically inactive precursor of ENX, resulting in the synthesis of 24 [85]. The synthesis involved reacting ENX with formaldehyde (CH2O) in a solution of dichloromethane and methanol mixed in an equal ratio at rt for 3 h. The resulting compound was obtained in 89% yield (Scheme 9). The antimicrobial effectiveness of the prodrug was evaluated in comparison to ENX using the agar diffusion method, specifically targeting E. coli, P. aureginosa, and S. aureus. The most noteworthy outcome was observed against E. coli, where the MIC was determined to be 0.2 μg/mL.
N-substituted piperazinyl quinolone 26 was synthesized and examined for in vitro antibacterial activity against various strains of bacteria [86,87]. Through the reaction of ENX with 25 and NaHCO3 in DMF at 85–90 °C for 12 h, 26 was obtained in satisfactory yield (Scheme 10). The antibacterial evaluation demonstrated that 26 exhibited potent and superior activity against the tested Gram-positive bacteria compared to reference FQs such as ENX. Compound 26 exhibited the highest activity against B. subtilis, with a MIC value of 0.008 μg/mL, surpassing the ENX value of 0.125 μg/mL.
Foroumadi et al. [88] reported a series of N-substituted piperazinyl quinolones using thiadiazole derivatives 27 with ENX and NaHCO3 in DMF at 85–90 °C for 12 h (Scheme 11). This method successfully synthesized bioactive derivatives of N-[5-(chlorobenzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl] piperazinyl quinolones 28ad in moderate yields (62–67%). To evaluate the efficacy of the synthesized compounds, the agar dilution method was employed against a panel of bacteria including S. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), B. subtilis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa. The results indicate that the obtained derivatives exhibited moderate antibacterial activity against the tested microorganisms (Table 5).
In a similar study, a variety of ENX-substituted derivatives 30ag were synthesized and tested for antibacterial activity in vitro by combining the ENX with appropriate intermediates 29ag [89]. The target derivatives were obtained through the N-alkylation of ENX with properly substituted intermediates 29ag by employing NaHCO3 as a base in DMF as an appropriate solvent in good yields (76–79%) (Scheme 12). The in vitro antibacterial activity of 30ag against various bacterial strains revealed that compounds 30ac and 30g demonstrate antibacterial activity similar to ENX against certain bacterial strains, particularly Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococci and Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli and Enterobacter cloacae (E. cloacae). However, none of the derivatives consistently outperformed ENX across all the tested strains (Table 6).
Foroumadi et al. [90] described the synthesis and antibacterial activity evaluation of piperazinyl-substituted ENX analogs 32ad. The synthesis involved reacting 31 with ENX using NaHCO3 in DMF at rt, resulting in the generation of ENX analogs 32ad in 45–72% yields (Scheme 13). The synthesized derivatives were evaluated against a variety of bacterial strains. All the tested derivatives show appreciable antibacterial activity against B. subtilis, with inhibitory concentrations ranging from 1.56 to 6.25 μg/mL. Although 32b has consistently shown moderate activity across the tested strains, none of the compounds 32ad demonstrated potent antibacterial effects that were comparable to the reference drug ENX (Table 7).
The same group [91] synthesized ENX furan-containing analogs from the furan-based intermediate 33. N-[2-(furan-3-yl)-2-oxoethyl] or N-[2-(furan-3-yl)-2-oxyiminoethyl] 34ad was produced by treating ENX with 33 in the presence of NaHCO3 at rt in moderate yields (41–59%) (Scheme 14). Evaluation of 34 against various bacterial strains revealed that 34ac exhibit comparable antibacterial activity to ciprofloxacin (CPX) against S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA I and II), S. epidermidis, and B. subtilis. Specifically, compound 34a has a MIC range of 0.39 to 0.78 μg/mL against these strains, which is similar to the MIC range of 0.19 to 0.39 μg/mL observed for CPX. Compound 34b demonstrates a potency of 0.39 μM against S. aureus, MRSA, and S. epidermidis, closely matching the efficacy of CPX. Likewise, compound 34c shows a MIC of 0.78 μg/mL against the same strains, again aligning with the antibacterial potency of CPX (Table 8).
Emami et al. [92] reported the synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of ENX coumarin-derived analogs 36ad. The synthesis of the hybrids required the reaction of ENX with coumarin-based precursors 35 (Scheme 15). This reaction took place in DMF in the presence of NaHCO3 at rt for 6–72 h, resulting in the desired analogs 36ad in moderate to excellent yields (57–91%). The antimicrobial efficacy of 36ad was assessed using the agar diffusion method. Compound 36a exhibits the most potent antibacterial activity across all tested bacteria, including S. aureus, MRSA I, MRSA II, S. epidermidis, B. subtilis, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae, with MIC values ranging from 0.049 to 3.13 μg/mL. Notably, 36a shows comparable or superior activity to the reference compound ENX against S. aureus, MRSA I, MRSA II, S. epidermidis, B. subtilis, and E. coli. Compound 36b also demonstrates significant antibacterial activity, with MIC values between 0.39 μg/mL and 12.5 μg/mL. However, 36b is generally less potent compared to ENX. On the other hand, compounds 36c and 36d exhibit weaker antibacterial potency compared to both 36a and 36b, with MIC values that are generally higher than those of ENX (Table 9).
Shafiee et al. [93] documented the synthesis and antibacterial activity of naphthyl-containing ENX analogs 38ad. The desired compounds were successfully synthesized using a versatile and efficient synthetic pathway (Scheme 16). This approach involved reacting ENX with 37 in the presence of NaHCO3 in DMF at rt for 72 h. The resulting products were obtained in good yield (51–83%). The antibacterial evaluation of these derivatives demonstrated promising activity against the tested analogs. Compound 38a displays comparable or superior antibacterial activity to ENX across all tested strains, with IC50 values ranging from 0.049 to 0.780 μg/mL. Similarly, 38b shows superior activity compared to ENX, particularly against B. subtilis and E. coli, with IC50 values of 0.190 and 0.390 μg/mL, respectively. In contrast, compounds 38c and 38d generally exhibit weaker antibacterial activity compared to 38a and 38b, as well as the reference compound ENX (Table 10).
Ahmed and colleagues [94] conducted a groundbreaking study where they skillfully synthesized and screened new alternative molecules of ENX derivatives as potential antibacterial and antibiofilm agents (Scheme 17). ENX was acylated with acid chlorides 39 using Et3N as a base in refluxing tetrahydrofuran (THF). The desired products 40ae were obtained with a moderate yield (49–64%). Evaluation of the antimicrobial potential of 40 against a panel of pathogens via the micro-broth dilution method revealed that all the synthesized derivatives were found to be active at low concentrations against MRSA, K. pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) with MIC values in the range of 12.5 to 25 μg/mL compared to the parent molecule, ENX. Specifically, compounds 40b, 40c, and 40e inhibited the growth of MRSA at a 1 μg/mL concentration better than the parent drug ENX. The antibiofilm inhibitory properties of the synthesized derivatives revealed that 40b, 40c, and 40e inhibited MRSA biofilm formation in the concentration range of 0.5 to 1 μg/mL (Table 11).
Wang and coworkers [95] generated a library of 3-arylfuran-2(5H)-one-fluoroquinolone hybrids 46ae. Initially, substituted phenylacetic acids 41ae were converted to sodium phenylacetates 42ae in a dilute NaOH solution. Subsequent treatment of the intermediate salt with ethyl bromoacetate in DMSO at rt for 4 h resulted in the formation of phenylacetic acid ethyl esters 43ae in excellent yields (90–95%). Cyclization of 43ae was accomplished using sodium hydride (NaH) in THF at 0 °C to rt, leading to the formation of 4-hydroxy-3-phenylfuran-2(5H)-ones 44ae. The introduction of an ethyl linker was achieved by dissolving 44ae in acetone and adding 1,2-dibromoethane and Et3N, followed by refluxing the mixture for 3–5 h, resulting in the formation of compounds 45ae in good yields. Finally, the target products 46ae were realized in moderate yields by combining ENX with 45ae in the presence of KI and DMAP in DMSO at 60 °C for 72 h (Scheme 18). The conjugated compounds were evaluated against a range of bacteria including tetracycline-resistant B. subtilis, E. coli, and S. aureus. Many of these analogs displayed antibacterial activity that was akin to the reference drug, CPX. Specifically, 46b exhibited superior antibacterial efficacy across all the tested bacteria, with MIC50 values ranging from 1.6 to 2.6 μg/mL, which were significantly better than CPX with MIC50 values between 2.7 and 6.82 μg/mL (Table 12).
Shaheen et al. [96] developed and produced a series of novel FQs that exhibit strong inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase (Scheme 19). The analogs were prepared by subjecting ENX to reflux conditions with various substituted benzyl chlorides 47ag in anhydrous acetone, in the presence of K2CO3, for 4–8 h. This process resulted in the desired monosubstituted compounds 48ag with satisfactory yields. The synthesized derivatives were then subjected to in vitro screening for α-glucosidase inhibition, along with in silico docking studies. The analogs 48ag demonstrated strong α-glucosidase inhibitory activity ranging from 48.7 to 74.5 μM, in comparison to the IC50 value of 425.6 μM observed for the reference α-glucosidase standard inhibitor drug, 1-deoxynojirimycin (Table 13). Docking studies of 48ag reveal that the molecular interactions of mono-benzylated derivatives align well with their inhibitory activity. These compounds were observed to form polar contacts with the active site of proteins, mainly involving residues such as Glu771, Asp392, Trp391, and Arg428.

2.3. Other Modifications (Parts A and B)

This category encompasses modifications performed on both the C3 and C7 sites of the 1,8-naphthyridine core of ENX derivatives.
In the same report, Shaheen and colleagues [96] developed and produced novel di-substituted benzyl FQ derivatives with excellent α-glucosidase inhibitory effects (Scheme 20). The analogs were prepared as demonstrated in Scheme 19. However, in this case, the ENX was refluxed with various substituted benzyl bromides 49ac in the presence of K2CO3 for 4–8 h, resulting in the formation of disubstituted derivatives 50ac. The in vitro α-glucosidase inhibition screening showed that compound 50a had the highest potency among all tested analogs, with an IC₅₀ value of 45.8 μM. Other analogs in this series, 50b and 50c, also exhibited notable inhibitory activity, with IC₅₀ values of 67.8 μM and 59.8 μM, respectively. These values are significantly lower than the IC₅₀ of 425.6 μM for the reference α-glucosidase inhibitor. Interestingly, 50a is not only more potent than the reference drug but also surpasses the parent compound, ENX, which has an IC₅₀ of 58.9 μM. Specifically, 50a is about 9.3-fold more potent than the reference drug, stressing its strong potential as a lead candidate for further development. Docking studies of compounds 50ac indicate that their molecular interactions are consistent with their observed inhibitory activity. These studies show that the di-benzylated derivatives form polar contacts with the active site of the enzyme, primarily interacting with residues such as Gly566, Glu771, Trp391, Asp508, Arg428, and Asp392 (Table 14).

3. Future Perspectives

The recent developments discussed in this review shed light on the synthesis of 4-quinolone-3-carboxylic acid derivatives, with a particular focus on scaffolds containing a 1,8-naphthyridine core reminiscent of ENX. These advancements pave the way for future exploration and innovation in this field. One promising avenue for future research is the further exploration of C3 modifications, as they have shown potential for generating diverse analogs with improved medicinal properties. By employing strategic modifications at the C3 position, researchers can fine-tune the pharmacological profile of these compounds, enhancing their efficacy and reducing potential side effects. Additionally, the C7 modification segment warrants further investigation, as it offers opportunities to optimize the physicochemical properties and biological activities of 4-quinolone-3-carboxylic acid derivatives. By carefully manipulating the C7 position, researchers can potentially enhance the bioavailability, target specificity, and overall therapeutic potential of these compounds. Lastly, the approach that combines modifications from both parts A and B (other modifications) presents a promising direction for the design and synthesis of novel enoxacin derivatives with diverse pharmacological applications. Within this framework, researchers can explore a wide range of structural modifications in order to produce analogs with specialized features and unique biological activities. Overall, these prospects for the future emphasize the intriguing possibility for further breakthroughs in the synthesis and research of 4-quinolone-3-carboxylic acid derivatives.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of developments in the synthesis of 4-quinolone-3-carboxylic acid derivatives, focusing on scaffolds containing a 1,8-naphthyridine core akin to ENX. The reviewed literature showcases various modifications at the C3 and C7 positions, as well as their combination, demonstrating their impact on the structural diversity, medicinal properties, and potential pharmacological applications of these compounds. The chosen reactions were selected based on their reproducibility, ease of execution, and the accessibility of the described methodologies. Researchers seeking to design and synthesize novel ENX derivatives with diverse pharmacological activities will find the insights presented in this review both valuable and insightful. This comprehensive analysis sets the stage for future investigations, where researchers can explore the untapped potential of 4-quinolone-3-carboxylic acids, specifically ENX derivatives, thereby opening new avenues for drug discovery and therapeutic interventions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S., N.E.B., G.G. and S.E.K.; resources, N.E.B., G.G. and S.E.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.S.; writing—Review and editing, G.S., N.E.B., G.G. and S.E.K.; supervision, N.E.B. and S.E.K.; project administration, N.E.B., G.G. and S.E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Euromed University of Fes (UEMF), Morocco, and the African Scientific, Research and Innovation Council (ASRIC) for their unwavering support and resources provided during the course of this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mugnaini, C.; Pasquini, S.; Corelli, F. The 4-quinolone-3-carboxylic acid motif as a multivalent scaffold in medicinal chemistry. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 1746–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Naeem, A.; Badshah, S.L.; Muska, M.; Ahmad, N.; Khan, K. The current case of quinolones: Synthetic approaches and antibacterial activity. Molecules 2016, 21, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sadeghi, M.; Sarvi, S.; Emami, S.; Khalilian, A.; Hosseini, S.A.; Montazeri, M.; Shahdin, S.; Nayeri, T.; Daryani, A. Evaluation of anti-parasitic activities of new quinolones containing nitrofuran moiety against Toxoplasma gondii. Exp. Parasitol. 2022, 240, 108344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chu, D.T.; Plattner, J.J.; Katz, L. New directions in antibacterial research. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3853–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Greenwood, D.; Finch, R.; Davey, P.; Wilcox, M. Antimicrobial Chemotherapy; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Millanao, A.R.; Mora, A.Y.; Villagra, N.A.; Bucarey, S.A.; Hidalgo, A.A. Biological effects of quinolones: A family of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Molecules 2021, 26, 7153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Robicsek, A.; Strahilevitz, J.; Jacoby, G.A.; Macielag, M.; Abbanat, D.; Park, C.H.; Bush, K.; Hooper, D.C. Fluoroquinolone-modifying enzyme: A new adaptation of a common aminoglycoside acetyltransferase. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Drlica, K.; Zhao, X. DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1997, 61, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zechiedrich, E.L.; Cozzarelli, N.R. Roles of topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase in DNA unlinking during replication in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 2859–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Drlica, K.; Hiasa, H.; Kerns, R.; Malik, M.; Mustaev, A.; Zhao, X. Quinolones: Action and resistance updated. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 981–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaur, P.; Anuradha; Chandra, A.; Tanwar, T.; Sahu, S.K.; Mittal, A. Emerging quinoline- and quinolone-based antibiotics in the light of epidemics. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2022, 100, 765–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McDermott, P.F.; Walker, R.D.; White, D.G. Antimicrobials: Modes of action and mechanisms of resistance. Int. J. Toxicol. 2003, 22, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lesher, G.Y.; Froelich, E.J.; Gruett, M.D.; Bailey, J.H.; Brundage, R.P. 1,8-Naphthyridine derivatives. A new class of chemotherapeutic agents. J. Med. Pharm. Chem. 1962, 5, 1063–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sanchez, J.P.; Domagala, J.M.; Hagen, S.E.; Heifetz, C.L.; Hutt, M.P.; Nichols, J.B.; Trehan, A.K. Quinolone antibacterial agents. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 8-substituted quinoline-3-carboxylic acids and 1,8-naphthyridine-3-carboxylic acids. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Emmerson, A.M.; Jones, A.M. The quinolones: Decades of development and use. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51 (Suppl. S1), 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pham, T.D.; Ziora, Z.M.; Blaskovich, M.A.J.M. Quinolone antibiotics. Med. Chem. Commun. 2019, 10, 1719–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, Y.Q.; Gao, C.; Zhang, S.; Xu, L.; Xu, Z.; Feng, L.S.; Wu, X.; Zhao, F. Quinoline hybrids and their antiplasmodial and antimalarial activities. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 139, 22–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Andersson, M.I.; MacGowan, A.P. Development of the quinolones. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51 (Suppl. S1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Senerovic, L.; Opsenica, D.; Moric, I.; Aleksic, I.; Spasic, M.; Vasiljevic, B. Quinolines and quinolones as antibacterial, antifungal, anti-virulence, antiviral and anti-parasitic agents. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1282, 37–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Richter, S.; Parolin, C.; Palumbo, M.; Palu, G. Antiviral properties of quinolone-based drugs. Curr. Drug Targets Infect. Disord. 2004, 4, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eckmann, C.; Dryden, M.; Montravers, P.; Kozlov, R.; Sganga, G. Antimicrobial treatment of “complicated” intra-abdominal infections and the new IDSA guidelines? A commentary and an alternative European approach according to clinical definitions. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2011, 16, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Platten, M.; Nollen, E.A.A.; Rohrig, U.F.; Fallarino, F.; Opitz, C.A. Tryptophan metabolism as a common therapeutic target in cancer, neurodegeneration and beyond. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019, 18, 379–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, L.; Zhang, J. Role of intestinal microbiota and metabolites on gut homeostasis and human diseases. BMC Immunol. 2017, 18, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tegze, A.; Sági, G.; Kovács, K.; Homlok, R.; Tóth, T.; Mohácsi-Farkas, C.; Wojnárovits, L.; Takács, E. Degradation of fluoroquinolone antibiotics during ionizing radiation treatment and assessment of antibacterial activity, toxicity and biodegradability of the products. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 147, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Van Maanen, J.M.; Retèl, J.; De Vries, J.; Pinedo, H.J. Mechanism of action of antitumor drug etoposide: A review. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1988, 80, 1526–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hawtin, R.E.; Stockett, D.E.; Byl, J.A.W.; McDowell, R.S.; Nguyen, T.; Arkin, M.R.; Conroy, A.; Yang, W.; Osheroff, N.; Fox, J.A.J. Voreloxin is an anticancer quinolone derivative that intercalates DNA and poisons topoisomerase II. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dine, I.; Mulugeta, E.; Melaku, Y.; Belete, M. Recent advances in the synthesis of pharmaceutically active 4-quinolone and its analogues: A review. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 8657–8682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Daneshtalab, M.; Ahmed, A. Nonclassical biological activities of quinolone derivatives. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 15, 52–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abdel-Aal, M.A.A.; Abdel-Aziz, S.A.; Shaykoon, M.S.A.; Abuo-Rahma, G.E.A. Towards anticancer fluoroquinolones: A review article. Arch. Pharm. 2019, 352, e1800376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Samir, M.; Ramadan, M.; Hamed, M.; Osman, M.; Abou=Rahma, G. Recent strategies in design of antitumor and antibacterial fluoroquinolones. J. Adv. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 4, 134–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jang, J.G.; Chung, J.H. Diagnosis and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Yeungnam Univ. J. Med. 2020, 37, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, J.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, D.K.; Yoon, H.I.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, S.M.; Yang, S.C.; Lee, J.H.; Yoo, C.G.; Lee, C.T.; et al. Retrospective comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin on multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2011, 26, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sidamo, T.; Shibeshi, W.; Yimer, G.; Aklillu, E.; Engidawork, E. Explorative analysis of treatment outcomes of levofloxacin- and moxifloxacin-based regimens and outcome predictors in ethiopian MDR-TB patients: A prospective observational cohort study. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 5473–5489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Litvinov, V.P.; Roman, S.V.; Dyachenko, V.D. Naphthyridines. Structure, physicochemical properties and general methods of synthesis. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2000, 69, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Anwair, M.A.; Zeglam, T.H.; Fhid, O.N.; Elmezogi, J.S.; Ong, C.S. Synthesis of some 1, 8-naphthyridine derivatives with comparative studies of cyclization in two different acids. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. Arch. 2012, 3, 752–758. [Google Scholar]
  36. Madaan, A.; Verma, R.; Kumar, V.; Singh, A.T.; Jain, S.K.; Jaggi, M. 1,8-Naphthyridine derivatives: A review of multiple biological activities. Arch. Pharm. 2015, 348, 837–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mithula, S.; Nandikolla, A.; Murugesan, S.; Kondapalli, V.G.J.F.M.C. 1, 8-naphthyridine derivatives: An updated review on recent advancements of their myriad biological activities. Future Med. Chem. 2021, 13, 1591–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, K.H. Novel antitumor agents from higher plants. Med. Res. Rev. 1999, 19, 569–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, K.H. Anticancer drug design based on plant-derived natural products. J. Biomed. Sci. 1999, 6, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dholwani, K.K.; Saluja, A.K.; Gupta, A.R.; Shah, D.R. A review on plant-derived natural products and their analogs with anti-tumor activity. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2008, 40, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Henwood, J.; Monk, J.J. Enoxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use. Drugs 1988, 36, 32–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wood, M.J. Tissue penetration and clinical efficacy of enoxacin in respiratory tract infections. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1989, 16 (Suppl. S1), 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chin, N.X.; Neu, H.C. In vitro activity of enoxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid, compared with those of norfloxacin, new beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and trimethoprim. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1983, 24, 754–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Paton, J.H.; Reeves, D.S. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Microbiology, pharmacokinetics and clinical use. Drugs 1988, 36, 193–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jalbrzykowska, K.; Chrzanowska, A.; Roszkowski, P.; Struga, M. The new face of a well-known antibiotic: A review of the anticancer activity of enoxacin and its derivatives. Cancers 2022, 14, 3056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Polishchuk, A.; Karaseva, É.; Emelina, T.; Nikolenko, Y.M.; Karasev, V.J.J.o.S.C. Electronic structure and specroscopic properties of norfloxacin, enoxacin, and nalidixic acid. J. Struct. Chem. 2009, 50, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ching, C.; Orubu, E.S.F.; Sutradhar, I.; Wirtz, V.J.; Boucher, H.W.; Zaman, M.H. Bacterial antibiotic resistance development and mutagenesis following exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of fluoroquinolones in vitro: A systematic review of the literature. JAC-Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 2, dlaa068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pfab, C.; Schnobrich, L.; Eldnasoury, S.; Gessner, A.; El-Najjar, N. Repurposing of antimicrobial agents for cancer therapy: What do we know? Cancers 2021, 13, 3193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, H.; Mao, M.; Zhao, R.; Zhao, Q. Enoxacin exerts anti-tumor effects against prostate cancer through inducing apoptosis. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2021, 20, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gioia, U.; Francia, S.; Cabrini, M.; Brambillasca, S.; Michelini, F.; Jones-Weinert, C.W.; d’Adda di Fagagna, F. Pharmacological boost of DNA damage response and repair by enhanced biogenesis of DNA damage response RNAs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yadav, V.; Talwar, P. Repositioning of fluoroquinolones from antibiotic to anti-cancer agents: An underestimated truth. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 111, 934–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lyu, B.; Wang, C.; Bie, Y.; Kong, J.; Wang, A.; Jin, L.; Qiu, Y.; Zhou, X. Enoxacin shows broad-spectrum antiviral activity against diverse viruses by enhancing antiviral RNA interference in insects. J. Virol. 2022, 96, e0177821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Felicetti, T.; Cecchetti, V.; Manfroni, G. Modulating microRNA processing: Enoxacin, the progenitor of a new class of drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 12275–12289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kumar, D.; Chandel, V.; Raj, S.; Rathi, B. In silico identification of potent FDA approved drugs against Coronavirus COVID-19 main protease: A drug repurposing approach. Chem. Biol. Lett. 2020, 7, 166–175. [Google Scholar]
  55. Gutierrez-Villagomez, J.M.; Campos-Garcia, T.; Molina-Torres, J.; Lopez, M.G.; Vazquez-Martinez, J. Alkamides and piperamides as potential antivirals against the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 8008–8016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yanez, O.; Osorio, M.I.; Uriarte, E.; Areche, C.; Tiznado, W.; Perez-Donoso, J.M.; Garcia-Beltran, O.; Gonzalez-Nilo, F. In silico study of coumarins and quinolines derivatives as potent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 595097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Romero, I.C.; Saravia, N.G.; Walker, J. Selective action of fluoroquinolones against intracellular amastigotes of Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis in vitro. J. Parasitol. 2005, 91, 1474–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hooper, D.C.; Wolfson, J.S. The fluoroquinolones: Pharmacology, clinical uses, and toxicities in humans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1985, 28, 716–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sousa, E.; Graca, I.; Baptista, T.; Vieira, F.Q.; Palmeira, C.; Henrique, R.; Jeronimo, C. Enoxacin inhibits growth of prostate cancer cells and effectively restores microRNA processing. Epigenetics 2013, 8, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Asahina, Y.; Araya, I.; Iwase, K.; Iinuma, F.; Hosaka, M.; Ishizaki, T. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of the 4-quinolone-3-carboxylic acid derivatives having a trifluoromethyl group as a novel N-1 substituent. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3443–3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pasquini, S.; De Rosa, M.; Pedani, V.; Mugnaini, C.; Guida, F.; Luongo, L.; De Chiaro, M.; Maione, S.; Dragoni, S.; Frosini, M.; et al. Investigations on the 4-quinolone-3-carboxylic acid motif. 4. Identification of new potent and selective ligands for the cannabinoid type 2 receptor with diverse substitution patterns and antihyperalgesic effects in mice. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 5444–5453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zahoor, A.F.; Yousaf, M.; Siddique, R.; Ahmad, S.; Naqvi, S.A.R.; Rizvi, S.M.A. Synthetic strategies toward the synthesis of enoxacin-, levofloxacin-, and gatifloxacin-based compounds: A review. Synth. Commun. 2017, 47, 1021–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bourzikat, O.; El Abbouchi, A.; Ghammaz, H.; El Brahmi, N.; El Fahime, E.; Paris, A.; Daniellou, R.; Suzenet, F.; Guillaumet, G.; El Kazzouli, S. Synthesis, anticancer activities and molecular docking studies of a novel class of 2-phenyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroimidazo [1,2-b]pyridazine derivatives bearing sulfonamides. Molecules 2022, 27, 5238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. El Abbouchi, A.; El Brahmi, N.; Hiebel, M.-A.; Bignon, J.; Guillaumet, G.; Suzenet, F.; El Kazzouli, S. Synthesis and biological evaluation of ethacrynic acid derivatives bearing sulfonamides as potent anti-cancer agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. El Abbouchi, A.; El Brahmi, N.; Hiebel, M.-A.; Bignon, J.; Guillaumet, G.; Suzenet, F.; El Kazzouli, S. Synthesis and evaluation of a novel class of ethacrynic acid derivatives containing triazoles as potent anticancer agents. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 115, 105293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. El Brahmi, N.; El Abbouchi, A.; El Kazzouli, S. An overview on the synthesis and anticancer properties of ethacrynic acid and their analogues. Results Chem. 2023, 6, 101117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. You, Q.D.; Li, Z.Y.; Huang, C.H.; Yang, Q.; Wang, X.J.; Guo, Q.L.; Chen, X.G.; He, X.G.; Li, T.K.; Chern, J.W. Discovery of a novel series of quinolone and naphthyridine derivatives as potential topoisomerase I inhibitors by scaffold modification. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 5649–5661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, L.; Yuan, Y.; Fu, C.; Xu, X.; Zhou, J.; Wang, S.; Kong, L.; Li, Z.; Guo, Q.; Wei, L. LZ-106, a novel analog of enoxacin, inducing apoptosis via activation of ROS-dependent DNA damage response in NSCLCs. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 95, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Saeed Arayne, M.; Sultana, N.; Haroon, U.; Ahmed Mesaik, M.; Asif, M. Synthesis and biological evaluations of enoxacin carboxamide derivatives. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2009, 32, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dalhoff, A. Immunomodulatory activities of fluoroquinolones. Infection 2005, 33 (Suppl. S2), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Alovero, F.L.; Pan, X.S.; Morris, J.E.; Manzo, R.H.; Fisher, L.M. Engineering the specificity of antibacterial fluoroquinolones: Benzenesulfonamide modifications at C-7 of ciprofloxacin change its primary target in streptococcus pneumoniae from topoisomerase IV to gyrase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mohammed, H.H.H.; Abuo-Rahma, G.; Abbas, S.H.; Abdelhafez, E.M.N. Current trends and future directions of fluoroquinolones. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 3132–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sharma, P.C.; Chaudhary, M.; Sharma, A.; Piplani, M.; Rajak, H.; Prakash, O. Insight view on possible role of fluoroquinolones in cancer therapy. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 2076–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Swedan, H.K.; Kassab, A.E.; Gedawy, E.M.; Elmeligie, S.E. Topoisomerase II inhibitors design: Early studies and new perspectives. Bioorg. Chem. 2023, 136, 106548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Alaaeldin, R.; Mustafa, M.; Abuo-Rahma, G.E.A.; Fathy, M. In vitro inhibition and molecular docking of a new ciprofloxacin-chalcone against SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 36, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ojha, M.; Yadav, D.; Kumar, A.; Dasgupta, S.; Yadav, R. 1, 8-naphthyridine derivatives: A privileged scaffold for versatile biological activities. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 586–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Boschelli, D.H.; Wang, Y.D.; Ye, F.; Wu, B.; Zhang, N.; Dutia, M.; Powell, D.W.; Wissner, A.; Arndt, K.; Weber, J.M.; et al. Synthesis and src kinase inhibitory activity of a series of 4-phenylamino-3-quinolinecarbonitriles. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 822–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Herczegh, P.; Buxton, T.B.; McPherson, J.C., 3rd; Kovacs-Kulyassa, A.; Brewer, P.D.; Sztaricskai, F.; Stroebel, G.G.; Plowman, K.M.; Farcasiu, D.; Hartmann, J.F. Osteoadsorptive bisphosphonate derivatives of fluoroquinolone antibacterials. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2338–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vracar, T.C.; Zuo, J.; Park, J.; Azer, D.; Mikhael, C.; Holliday, S.A.; Holsey, D.; Han, G.; VonMoss, L.; Neubert, J.K.; et al. Enoxacin and bis-enoxacin stimulate 4T1 murine breast cancer cells to release extracellular vesicles that inhibit osteoclastogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Darehkordi, A.; Javanmiri, M.; Ghazi, S.; Assar, S. Synthesis of N-aryl-2,2,2-trifluoroacetimidoyl piperazinylquinolone derivatives and their antibacterial evaluations. J. Fluor. Chem. 2011, 132, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xiao, Z.P.; Wang, X.D.; Wang, P.F.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.W.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, S.S.; Ouyang, H.; Lin, X.Y.; et al. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel fluoroquinolone-flavonoid hybrids as potent antibiotics against drug-resistant microorganisms. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 80, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Emami, S.; Shahrokhirad, N.; Foroumadi, A.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Samadi, N.; Soltani-Ghofrani, N. 7-Piperazinylquinolones with methylene-bridged nitrofuran scaffold as new antibacterial agents. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 5940–5947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mirzaei, M.; Foroumadi, A. Synthesis and in-vitro antibacterial activity of N-piperazinyl quinolone derivatives with a 2-thienyl group. Pharm. Pharmacol. Commun. 2000, 6, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Foroumadi, A.; Emami, S.; Rajabalian, S.; Badinloo, M.; Mohammadhosseini, N.; Shafiee, A. N-Substituted piperazinyl quinolones as potential cytotoxic agents: Structure-activity relationships study. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2009, 63, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chadha, D.; Agarwal, S. Synthesis and preformulation studies of a prodrug of enoxacin. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 1997, 59, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  86. Foroumadi, A.; Soltani, F.; Moshafi, M.H.; Ashraf-Askari, R. Synthesis and in vitro antibacterial activity of some N-(5-aryl-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-yl)piperazinyl quinolone derivatives. Farmaco 2003, 58, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Foroumadi, A.; Mansouri, S.; Kiani, Z.; Rahmani, A. Synthesis and in vitro antibacterial evaluation of N-[5-(5-nitro-2-thienyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-yl] piperazinyl quinolones. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 851–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Foroumadi, A.; Firoozpour, L.; Emami, S.; Mansouri, S.; Ebrahimabadi, A.H.; Asadipour, A.; Amini, M.; Saeid-Adeli, N.; Shafiee, A. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of N-[5-(chlorobenzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl] piperazinyl quinolone derivatives. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2007, 30, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Foroumadi, A.; Emami, S.; Davood, A.; Moshafi, M.; Sharifian, A.; Tabatabaie, M.; Farimani, H.T.; Sepehri, G.; Shafiee, A. Synthesis and in-vitro antibacterial activities of N-substituted piperazinyl quinolones. Pharm. Pharmacol. Commun. 1997, 3, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Foroumadi, A.; Ghodsi, S.; Emami, S.; Najjari, S.; Samadi, N.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Beikmohammadi, L.; Shirazi, F.H.; Shafiee, A. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of new fluoroquinolones containing a substituted N-(phenethyl)piperazine moiety. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 3499–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Foroumadi, A.; Mohammadhosseini, N.; Emami, S.; Letafat, B.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Samadi, N.; Shafiee, A. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of new 7-piperazinyl-quinolones containing a functionalized 2-(furan-3-yl)ethyl moiety. Arch. Pharm. 2007, 340, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Emami, S.; Foroumadi, A.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Samadi, N. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of quinolone-based compounds containing a coumarin moiety. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 2008, 341, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Shafiee, A.; Emami, S.; Ghodsi, S.; Najjari, S.; Sorkhi, M.; Samadi, N.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Foroumadi, A. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of N-[2-(2-naphthyl)ethyl]piperazinyl quinolones. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2009, 6, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ahmed, A.; Khan, A.K.; Karim, A.; Siddiqui, R.; Rafique, R.; Ali, S.A.; Solangi, M.; Taha, M.; Khan, K.M. Enoxacin-based derivatives: Antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent: A biology-oriented drug synthesis (BIODS) approach. Future Med. Chem. 2022, 14, 947–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, X.D.; Wei, W.; Wang, P.F.; Tang, Y.T.; Deng, R.C.; Li, B.; Zhou, S.S.; Zhang, J.W.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, Z.P.; et al. Novel 3-arylfuran-2(5H)-one-fluoroquinolone hybrid: Design, synthesis and evaluation as antibacterial agent. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 3620–3628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Shaheen, A.; Ashiq, U.; Jamal, R.A.; Khan, K.M.; Gul, S.; Yousuf, S.; Ali, S.T. Design and synthesis of fluoroquinolone derivatives as potent α-glucosidase inhibitors: In vitro inhibitory screening with in silico docking studies. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 2483–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Labeled structural representation of FQs containing a 1,8-naphthyridine core. There are two important distinct positions, C7 and N1 (R1 and R2), with diverse substituents.
Figure 1. Labeled structural representation of FQs containing a 1,8-naphthyridine core. There are two important distinct positions, C7 and N1 (R1 and R2), with diverse substituents.
Biomolecules 14 01419 g001
Figure 2. Fluorinated and non-fluorinated 1,8-naphthyridine-containing molecules.
Figure 2. Fluorinated and non-fluorinated 1,8-naphthyridine-containing molecules.
Biomolecules 14 01419 g002
Figure 3. Main sites for the structural modification of ENX.
Figure 3. Main sites for the structural modification of ENX.
Biomolecules 14 01419 g003
Scheme 1. Synthesis of ENX derivatives 3ac, 4, 5ac, and 6.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of ENX derivatives 3ac, 4, 5ac, and 6.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 1,8-naphthyridin-3-yl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-6-carbonitrile 8.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 1,8-naphthyridin-3-yl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-6-carbonitrile 8.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of aryl-substituted ENX carboxamides 10ad and carbohydrazide 11.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of aryl-substituted ENX carboxamides 10ad and carbohydrazide 11.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch003
Scheme 4. Synthesis of bis-phosphonic-ENX 14.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of bis-phosphonic-ENX 14.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch004
Scheme 5. Synthesis of ENX derivative 16.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of ENX derivative 16.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch005
Scheme 6. Synthesis of ENX flavonoid-based analogs 19ac.
Scheme 6. Synthesis of ENX flavonoid-based analogs 19ac.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch006
Scheme 7. Methylene-bridged nitrofuran N-substituted quinolone synthesis 21.
Scheme 7. Methylene-bridged nitrofuran N-substituted quinolone synthesis 21.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch007
Scheme 8. Synthesis of ENX derivatives 23ad.
Scheme 8. Synthesis of ENX derivatives 23ad.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch008
Scheme 9. Synthesis of N-piperazinyl-substituted ENX prodrug 24.
Scheme 9. Synthesis of N-piperazinyl-substituted ENX prodrug 24.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch009
Scheme 10. Synthesis of N-substituted piperazinyl quinolone 26.
Scheme 10. Synthesis of N-substituted piperazinyl quinolone 26.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch010
Scheme 11. Synthesis of N-[5-(chlorobenzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl] quinolones 28ad.
Scheme 11. Synthesis of N-[5-(chlorobenzylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl] quinolones 28ad.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch011
Scheme 12. Synthesis of ENX-substituted derivatives 30ag.
Scheme 12. Synthesis of ENX-substituted derivatives 30ag.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch012
Scheme 13. Synthesis of ENX derivatives 32ad.
Scheme 13. Synthesis of ENX derivatives 32ad.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch013
Scheme 14. Synthesis of ENX furan-containing analogs 34ad.
Scheme 14. Synthesis of ENX furan-containing analogs 34ad.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch014
Scheme 15. Synthesis of ENX–coumarin hybrid 36ad.
Scheme 15. Synthesis of ENX–coumarin hybrid 36ad.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch015
Scheme 16. Synthesis of naphthyl-based ENX analogs 38ad.
Scheme 16. Synthesis of naphthyl-based ENX analogs 38ad.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch016
Scheme 17. Synthesis of acyl-substituted ENX derivatives 40ae.
Scheme 17. Synthesis of acyl-substituted ENX derivatives 40ae.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch017
Scheme 18. Synthesis of 3-arylfuran-2(5H)-one-ENX hybrids 46ae.
Scheme 18. Synthesis of 3-arylfuran-2(5H)-one-ENX hybrids 46ae.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch018
Scheme 19. Synthesis of piperazinyl mono-benzylated ENX derivatives 48ag.
Scheme 19. Synthesis of piperazinyl mono-benzylated ENX derivatives 48ag.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch019
Scheme 20. Synthesis of piperazinyl di-benzylated ENX derivatives 50ac.
Scheme 20. Synthesis of piperazinyl di-benzylated ENX derivatives 50ac.
Biomolecules 14 01419 sch020
Table 1. In vitro antiproliferative activity of compounds 3ac, 4, 5ac, and 6.
Table 1. In vitro antiproliferative activity of compounds 3ac, 4, 5ac, and 6.
CompoundRXAntiproliferative Activity (IC50, μM)
KBA2780Bel7402
3aHNH2.04.84.1
3bHO11.715.316.8
3cHS2.42.72.4
4ClNH10.36.321.5
5aNO2NH22.412.410.8
5bNO2O1.8ND3.0
5cNO2S179.3200.224.6
6--30.142.393.3
ND: not determined.
Table 2. Immunomodulatory effect of ENX carboxamides 10ad and carbohydrazide 11 (Comparable effects of 10ad and 11 on the oxidative burst activity of whole blood phagocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages).
Table 2. Immunomodulatory effect of ENX carboxamides 10ad and carbohydrazide 11 (Comparable effects of 10ad and 11 on the oxidative burst activity of whole blood phagocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages).
Oxidative Burst Effects (IC50, µg/mL)
CompoundROxidative Burst of Whole Blood UsingOxidative Burst of PMNs UsingOxidative Burst of Macrophages UsingOxidative Burst of Whole Blood Using
LuminolLuminolLucigeninLuminol
10aBiomolecules 14 01419 i0018.57.617.58.7
10bBiomolecules 14 01419 i0022.60.81.03.2
10cBiomolecules 14 01419 i00313.39.122.39.5
10dBiomolecules 14 01419 i004>25>25>25>25
11-1.41.42.61.4
ENX->25>25>25>25
PMNs: Polymorphoneutrophils.
Table 3. In vitro antibacterial activity of 19ac against selected microbes.
Table 3. In vitro antibacterial activity of 19ac against selected microbes.
Antibacterial Activity (MIC, µg/mL)
CompoundR1R2E. coliB. subtilisS. aureusC. albicans
19aHH46.30.4521.52.60
19bHBiomolecules 14 01419 i005>5016.133.617.5
19cBiomolecules 14 01419 i006H>50>50>50>50
CPX--5.652.706.8232.4
Table 4. In vitro cytotoxic evaluation of compounds 23ad against a panel of cell lines.
Table 4. In vitro cytotoxic evaluation of compounds 23ad against a panel of cell lines.
CompoundRAnticancer Activity (IC50, μM)
SKMEL-3MCF-7A431EJSW480KB
23aO10610613166100117
23bNOH10.33.65.65.03.24.8
23cNOMe13192.95.96.74.7
23dNOBn13.61252.28.04212
ENX-196193175178159137
Table 5. In vitro antibacterial activity of 28ad against different bacterial strains.
Table 5. In vitro antibacterial activity of 28ad against different bacterial strains.
CompoundRAntibacterial Activity (MIC, μg/mL)
S. aureusS. epidermidisB. subtilisE. coliK. pneumoniaeP. aeruginosa
28a2-Cl124>4>4>4
28b3-Cl>4>4>4>4>4>4
28c4-Cl>4>4>4>4>4>4
28d2,4-diCl44>4>4>4>4
ENX-10.50.1250.250.254
Table 6. In vitro antibacterial activity of 30ag against various bacterial strains.
Table 6. In vitro antibacterial activity of 30ag against various bacterial strains.
CompoundR Antibacterial Activity (MIC, μg/mL)
R1S. aureusS. epidermisE. coli K. pneumoniae E. cloacae P. aeruginosa
30aOH220.250.50.54
30bOF420–5218
30cNOHH0.50.5160.516>64
30dNOHF10.5160.2516>64
30eBiomolecules 14 01419 i007H161641616>64
30fBiomolecules 14 01419 i008F6464166416>64
30gBiomolecules 14 01419 i009F0.50.580.58>64
ENX--10.50.130.50.134
Table 7. In vitro antibacterial activity of 32ad against various bacterial strains.
Table 7. In vitro antibacterial activity of 32ad against various bacterial strains.
CompoundR1R2Antibacterial Activity (MIC, μg/mL)
S. aureusS. epidermisB. Subtilis E. coli K. pneumoniae P. aeruginosa
32aHH25256.2512.512.5>100
32bFH12.56.256.256.251.56100
32cHF25251.565025>100
32dClCl25253.1312.56.2550
ENX--15.60.780.0980.0980.0986.25
Table 8. In vitro antibacterial activity results of compounds 34ad.
Table 8. In vitro antibacterial activity results of compounds 34ad.
CompoundRAntibacterial Activity (MIC, μg/mL)
S. aureusMRSA IMRSA IIS. epidermisB. Subtilis E. coli K. pneumoniae P. aeruginosa
34aO0.780.780.780.780.390.390.1912.5
34bNOH0.390.390.390.391.561.560.3950
34cNOMe0.780.780.780.781.561.560.78>100
34dNOBn2512.512.512.53.133.131.56>100
NOR-0.390.780.780.390.0250.0490.0253.13
CPX-0.190.390.390.190.0120.0120.0120.39
Table 9. In vitro antibacterial activity of 36ad against various bacterial strains.
Table 9. In vitro antibacterial activity of 36ad against various bacterial strains.
CompoundRAntibacterial Activity (MIC, μg/mL)
S. aureusMRSA IMRSA IIS. epidermisB. Subtilis E. coli K. pneumoniae P. aeruginosa
36aO0.780.780.780.390.390.0490.0493.13
36bNOH3.133.133.131.560.780.780.3912.5
36cNOMe3.133.133.136.250.786.251.56>100
36dNOBn50>100>10010010010012.5>100
ENX-0.390.780.780.0980.190.0980.0491.56
Table 10. In vitro antibacterial activity of 38ad against a panel of bacteria.
Table 10. In vitro antibacterial activity of 38ad against a panel of bacteria.
CompoundRAntibacterial Activity (MIC, μg/mL)
S. aureusMRSA IMRSA IIS. epidermisB. SubtilisE. coliK. pneumoniaeP. aeruginosa
38aO0.780.780.780.780.390.0980.0490.78
38bNOH0.780.780.780.780.193.130.39>100
38cNOMe3.133.133.133.130.781.560.78100
38dNOBn>100>100>10010010010025>100
ENX-0.780.780.781.260.780.0980.0981.56
Table 11. In vitro antimicrobial/antibiofilm activity evaluation of 40ae.
Table 11. In vitro antimicrobial/antibiofilm activity evaluation of 40ae.
Antimicrobial/Antibiofilm Activity (μg/mL)
CompoundRK. pneumoniaeProteus mirabilisMRSA
MICMBCMBICMICMBCMBICMICMBCMBIC
40aBiomolecules 14 01419 i01025256.2512.550.025.06.412.14.0
40bBiomolecules 14 01419 i0118.016.08.032.565.016.01.02.00.5
40cBiomolecules 14 01419 i01225.050.06.2525.050.025.01.02.01.0
40dBiomolecules 14 01419 i01312.525.06.2512.550.025.012.530.02.0
40eBiomolecules 14 01419 i01412.5256.2525.050.012.51.02.50.5
MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration; MBIC: minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.
Table 12. In vitro antibacterial activity of compounds 46ae.
Table 12. In vitro antibacterial activity of compounds 46ae.
CompoundR1R2R3Antibacterial Activity (MIC (μg/mL)
E. coliS. aureusa B. subtilis
46aHHH5.66.812.6
46bFHH2.62.61.6
46cHClH2.98.715.3
46dHHCl9.624.913.2
46eHBrH12.213.14.7
CPX---5.656.822.70
a B. subtilis: tetracycline-resistant Bacillus subtilis.
Table 13. In vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of compounds 48ag.
Table 13. In vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of compounds 48ag.
CompoundRα-Glucosidase Inhibitory Effect (GIC, μM)
48a-57.8
48b4-Me69.8
48c4-Cl74.5
48d2,4-diCl63.8
48e3,4-diCl52.7
48f2,6-diCl74.2
48g2,6-diF48.7
DNJ-425.6
DNJ: 1-deoxynojirimycin (standard inhibitor α-glucosidase); GIC: α-glucosidase inhibitory concentration.
Table 14. In vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of compounds 50ac.
Table 14. In vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of compounds 50ac.
CompoundRα-Glucosidase Inhibitory Effect (GIC, μM)
50a2-Br45.8
50b2-Cl,4-F67.8
50c4-NO259.8
ENX-58.9
DNJ-425.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suleiman, G.; El Brahmi, N.; Guillaumet, G.; El Kazzouli, S. Advances in the Synthesis and Biological Applications of Enoxacin-Based Compounds. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14111419

AMA Style

Suleiman G, El Brahmi N, Guillaumet G, El Kazzouli S. Advances in the Synthesis and Biological Applications of Enoxacin-Based Compounds. Biomolecules. 2024; 14(11):1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14111419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suleiman, Garba, Nabil El Brahmi, Gérald Guillaumet, and Saïd El Kazzouli. 2024. "Advances in the Synthesis and Biological Applications of Enoxacin-Based Compounds" Biomolecules 14, no. 11: 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14111419

APA Style

Suleiman, G., El Brahmi, N., Guillaumet, G., & El Kazzouli, S. (2024). Advances in the Synthesis and Biological Applications of Enoxacin-Based Compounds. Biomolecules, 14(11), 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14111419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop