Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Anti-Cancer Activity In Vitro of Synephrine Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Gut Microbiota Modulation: A Novel Strategy for Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Difference a Year Can Make: How Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Have Changed in Northwestern Transylvania

by
Matei-Ștefan Dobrescu
1,2,3,
Dan-Alexandru Țoc
4,5,
Adrian-Gabriel Pană
6,
Carmen Costache
4,5 and
Anca Butiuc-Keul
2,3,*
1
Doctoral School of Integrative Biology, Babeș-Bolyai University, 1 M. Kogalniceanu Street, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Babeș-Bolyai University, 1 M. Kogalniceanu Street, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Centre for Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Babes-Bolyai University, 5–7 Clinicilor Street, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Department of Microbiology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
5
Cluj County Emergency Hospital, 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
6
Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2025, 15(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010001
Submission received: 5 November 2024 / Revised: 12 December 2024 / Accepted: 21 December 2024 / Published: 24 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Mechanisms of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance)

Abstract

:
This study examines the prevalence and the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from healthcare units in Northwestern Transylvania, Romania, between 2022 and 2023. Given the alarming rise in antibiotic resistance, the study screened 34 isolates for resistance to 10 antibiotics, 46 ARGs, and integrase genes using PCR analysis. The results reveal a concerning increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates over the two-year period. Notably, the prevalence of ARGs encoding resistance to sulfonamides and beta-lactams, particularly sul1 and blaOXA-50, has shown a significant rise. Furthermore, the study detected the emergence of new resistance mechanisms in the same time interval. These include target protection and even more specific mechanisms, such as metallo-beta-lactamases or enzymes involved in the methylation of 23S rRNA. Statistical analysis further confirmed the correlation between Class I integrons and several ARGs, underscoring the role of horizontal gene transfer in the dissemination of resistance. These findings emphasize the urgent need for updated treatment strategies and monitoring programs to effectively combat the spread of ARGs in clinical settings.

1. Introduction

Antibiotics play a crucial role in the treatment and prevention of diseases caused by harmful bacteria, dramatically lowering mortality rates [1]. The 20th century was widely regarded as the ‘golden age’ of antibiotics, during which they were extensively used in both humans and animals. Their widespread use significantly reduced the incidence and severity of infectious diseases globally, leading to a dramatic decrease in morbidity and mortality. Notably, antibiotic consumption has continued to rise in the 21st century, likely due to the improved access to these medications in low- and middle-income countries. In fact, global antibiotic consumption increased by a substantial 65% between 2000 and 2015, coinciding with the remarkable decline in deaths caused by infectious diseases [2].
Antimicrobial resistance poses an alarming global hazard to human health, defined by bacteria’s acquisition of resistance to the bacteriostatic or bactericidal effects of antibiotics, complicating the treatment of diseases caused by these pathogens [1]. Over the past ten years, antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) have been found in various types of habitats, including natural and clinical ones. Most scientists agree that anthropogenic activities, such as the use of antibiotics in clinical settings, are the primary factors contributing to the increased resistance in bacteria and ARGs [3].
Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) significantly contributes to bacterial diversity by facilitating the exchange of genetic material among unrelated bacterial cells, enabling microorganisms to acquire traits that enhance their adaptation to novel or stressful environments, optimize resource utilization, and defend against harmful substances [4]. Horizontal gene transfer significantly contributes to the medical crisis posed by antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria, whose number is rising due to the acquisition of ARGs via mechanisms such as conjugation or through mobile genetic elements like integrons [1]. Integrons have a significant role in dissemination during antibiotic treatment, being capable of re-arrangements through a “copy–paste” model, thus creating copies of a gene, increasing resistance to a certain antibiotic. This was identified for ARGs such as ant(2″)-Ia (aadB). Another mechanism is cassette duplication in relevant plasmids, observed in plasmids carrying the blaVIM-1 gene [5].
The World Health Organization identifies 12 pathogenic bacteria responsible for nosocomial infections, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa categorized in the highest risk class, prioritizing the development of novel treatments [6]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium, round-cylindrical, and facultatively anaerobic; the structures involved in anaerobic survival help the species persist and develop in unfavorable environments [7]. These bacteria, which are found in the environment and are a part of the gut flora, can lead to respiratory and urinary tract infections, particularly in those with impaired immune systems [8].
Bacteria focused on becoming equipped to avoid, dispose of, or adapt to the substances that endangered them as they evolved [7]. The bacterial genome has undergone a number of mutations over time that have caused the overexpression of genes, such as those encoding enzymes that render antibiotics inactive or genes encoding efflux pumps. This has led to the bacteria becoming resistant to a wide range of antibiotic classes [9]. Acquiring resistance to at least three classes of antibiotics will render the bacteria multidrug-resistant (MDR) [10], while others can become extensively drug-resistant (XDR), being resistant to all classes of antibiotics, except one or two [11].
Most studies focus on the phenotypic identification of antibiotic resistance, which does not necessarily show a complete image of the resistance profile of an isolate/strain [12,13,14]. In Romania, the situation is even worse; only a few studies focus on the genotypic investigation of several pathogens usually found in clinical settings or environmental samples. Unfortunately, there are no studies regarding the comprehensive analysis of the phenotypic and genotypic resistance of the most important bacterial pathogens involved in nosocomial infections, across the years, making it difficult to observe and follow the evolution and spread of antibiotic resistance genes. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the pattern of resistance and the prevalence of several ARGs in P. aeruginosa isolates from healthcare units from NW Transylvania, Romania, during the COVID post-pandemic (2022–2023), focusing on the novel mechanisms of resistance acquired by bacteria because of selective pressure of antibiotics used in therapy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Bacterial isolates of P. aeruginosa have been collected between January 2022 and December 2023 (22 in 2022 and 12 in 2023) from 2 hospitals from Northwestern Transylvania (Cluj Emergency County Hospital and Satu Mare Emergency County Hospital). Species identification was conducted using the VITEK-2 Compact system, specifically the VITEK® 2 GP ID card (bioMérieux, Inc., Marcy l’Etoile, France), and phenotypic resistance profiles to 10 antibiotics were determined using the VITEK® 2 AST-P592 card (bioMérieux, Inc., Marcy l’Etoile, France). All isolates were obtained under full anonymity and ethics agreements were signed.
All isolates were screened for 46 ARGs, as well as integrase genes for class I, II, and III integrons by PCR amplification. Specific primers (Eurogentec, Belgium) were used to amplify genes encoding antimicrobial resistance and integron integrase (as listed in Supplementary Table S1).

2.2. Methods

PCR reactions were conducted in a total volume of 25 μL, comprising 12.5 μL of DreamTaq Green PCR master mix (2×) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Whaltman, MA, USA), 10.25 μL of nuclease-free water (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland), 25 pmol of each primer (Eurogentec, Liège, Belgium), and 2 μL of bacterial suspension. DNA isolation was omitted, and the PCR technique utilized bacterial suspensions as templates. Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures were diluted in sterile water to achieve a concentration of approximately 106 cells/mL [15]. The PCR reaction was mixed with 2 μL of sterile water as a negative control. The standard PCR protocol was as follows: 4 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 45 s at a certain annealing temperature (based on the primers used, as indicated in Supplementary Table S1), and an 8-minute final extension at 72 °C. PCRs were performed using a thermocycler TProfessional Trio (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany), Mastercycler Nexus (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany), or Gradient Palm-Cycler (Corbett Life Science, Sydney, Australia). The amplicons were separated in 1.5% w/v agarose gel (Cleaver Scientific, Rugby, Warwickshire, UK) in 1 × TAE buffer (Lonza, Switzerland), and then stained with 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). BioDocAnalyze software (Analytik Jena, Germany) and the BDA Digital Compact System were used to acquire the data. A workflow of the analysis of the phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa is presented in Figure 1.

2.3. Data Analysis

Statistical tests were made by using the R (ver. 4.4.1, The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria) and RStudio software (ver. 2024.09.0+375, Posit Software, Boston, MA, USA). The applied tests were Mann–Whitney U for correlations and Chi-test for significance [16], all available in R packages. For all tests, a p value under 0.05 is considered significant.

3. Results

The isolates of P. aeruginosa were obtained from samples originating from urine, purulent collections, tracheal aspirates, blood, plague secretions, and pleural or pericardial fluids. The VITEK2 screening identified the resistance and susceptibility to 10 antibiotics (amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, colistin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, piperacillin, and tobramycin). Most isolates from 2023 are resistant to nine antibiotics and susceptible to one, colistin. In contrast, samples from 2022 have a wider range of susceptibility profiles, half of the samples being resistant to none or at most one antibiotic, while the rest are resistant to almost all screened antibiotics. Isolates obtained from urine samples show a broader resistance pattern, while isolates from tracheal aspirates are susceptible to all screened antibiotics. A small number of isolates (4 out of 34) are resistant to colistin, while 10 out of the 34 screened isolates were identified to be susceptible to all antibiotics used in the VITEK 2 screening (Supplementary Table S2). All isolates were characterized as MDR when tested by VITEK 2.
Out of all isolates, 70.59% are resistant to piperacillin, 70.59% to ciprofloxacin, and 67.65% to ceftazidime. In opposition, 58.82% of the isolates are resistant to amikacin, 55.88% to piperacillin-tazobactam, and only 11.76% are resistant to colistin. Comparing 2022 to 2023, the prevalence of the isolates resistant to the antibiotics tested has increased, mostly for ciprofloxacin (from 54.55% to 100%), piperacillin (from 54.55% to 100%), and cefepime (from 54.55% to 91.67%), while the lowest increases were for piperacillin-tazobactam (from 50% to 66.67%), meropenem (from 54.55% to 66.67%), and amikacin (from 54.55% to 66.67%). Out of all these, only the increases for ciprofloxacin and piperacillin resistance are significant (Chi-test, p < 0.05).
Out of the 46 screened ARGs, we identified 26 resistance genes which encode the resistance to the following classes of antibiotics: beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, macrolides, quinolones, nitrofurans, and phosphonic acid. An increased prevalence can be observed from 2022 to 2023 for the blaOXA-50 gene from 63% to 91% and for the sul1 gene from 18% to 91%. However, in 2023, several ARGs such as amp and ermA were not found in the analyzed isolates and the prevalence of aph(2″)-Ib and ampC genes decreased. Out of all these genes, we only found a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of the sul1 gene and a statistically significant decrease in the prevalence of the ampC gene (Chi-test, p < 0.05) (Figure 2). The most prevalent ARGs are blaOXA-50 (25 out of 34 isolates), sul1 (18 out of 34 isolates), and amp (11 out of 34 isolates).
The following ARGs were identified in 2022: aph2″-Ib, blaOXA-50, ampC, amp, sul1, tetA, ermA, and ermB. In 2023, over 20 ARGs have been identified, such as fosA, nfsA, nfsB, mexA, and mexB, which relate to resistance to phosphonic acid, nitrofurans, and broad-spectrum resistance (Figure 3). In both 2022 and 2023, blaOXA-50 has a high prevalence, followed by sul1. In 2023, more ARGs encoding resistance to beta-lactams (blaVIM-1 and TEM-1), sulfonamides (sul2), tetracyclines (tetC and tetK), macrolides (ermC and mphC), and aminoglycosides (aac(6′)-II, ant(4′)-Ia, aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2′)-Ia, aac(3)-I, and aac(6′)-Im) were identified.
Regarding the mechanisms of resistance, most identified ARGs encode proteins that inactivate an antibiotic, by destroying the beta-lactam ring or by modifying the antibiotic molecule. In 2022, only ARGs encoding the enzymes phosphotransferase and serine beta-lactamase were identified, while, in 2023, new genes were found encoding 6′-N-acetyltransferase, acetyltransferase, and metallo-beta-lactamase. In 2023, we identified the ermC gene in the analyzed isolates which encodes an enzyme involved in the methylation of 23S rRNA in order to modify the antibiotic target, with the enzyme not being present in 2022. Compared to 2022, in 2023, the emergence of a new resistance mechanism such as target protection, encoded by genes like qnrB (Table 1), was observed.
In 2023, genotypic resistance increased considerably, such as, for example, in sulfonamides, from 18% to 92%, followed by tetracyclines, from 18% to 67%. Both increases are statistically significant (Chi-test, p < 0.05). In 2023, all screened isolates were resistant to beta-lactams. Compared to 2022, isolates from 2023 are also resistant to quinolones, nitrofurans, and phosphonic acid (Figure 4).
Out of 34 isolates, 20% are MDR (7 isolates), 21% are XDR (7 isolates), and 59% are non-MDR (20 isolates). In 2022, 72.73% of the isolates were non-MDR and 27.27% were MDR. In 2023, XDR isolates represent 58.33% of the isolates. MDR isolates have decreased to 8.33% and non-MDR isolates represent 33.33% (Figure 5).
The class I integron was identified in 54% of isolates and 43% do not contain integrons at all. It is important to note that one isolate (3% of total) contains both class I and II integrons. An increase in the number of isolates bearing the class I integrons between 2022 and 2023 from 32% to 100% has been observed. There are no isolates harboring only class II integrons (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Through the VITEK 2 screening, the resistance to 10 antibiotics such as amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, colistin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacil-tazobactam, piperacillin, and tobramycin (corresponding to four classes of antibiotics: aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, polymyxins, and fluoroquinolones) was identified throughout the isolates. According to the phenotypic pattern of resistance, all selected isolates were reported as MDR. However, due to the low number of antibiotics tested (according to the hospital protocol) and the high prevalence of class I integrons in isolates, we assumed that genotypic resistance could be even higher, and a more comprehensive ARG screening was performed. Thus, several ARGs were analyzed for each antibiotic tested, but other ARGs encoding the resistance to sulfonamides, macrolides, and tetracyclines were tested as well, according to Supplementary Table S3. The results regarding the ARG screening confirmed our assumption: 55.88% (19 out of 34) of the isolates showed complex patterns of ARGs, encoding the resistance to many more other classes of antibiotics than phenotypically tested. There are also cases where the phenotypic resistance was not confirmed by the presence of the ARGs tested, such as, for example, P1_22, which is resistant to piperacillin, but the ampC gene was not identified, or isolates P3_22 and P4_22 presenting resistances to amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin, and tobramycin, but the associated ARGs were not identified by PCR screening. The possible explanations could be that the resistance to those antibiotics is encoded by other genes which were not investigated in this study or due to the putative mutations in the ARG sequences that do not allow the proper alignment of primers during PCR.
Nevertheless, our results were similar to another study from Spain, in which 243 isolates of P. aeruginosa from blood samples were tested for the same antibiotics as in our study, except for piperacillin, but also for gentamycin, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and ceftazidime [18]. When looking at the commonly tested antibiotics in isolates originating from blood, a decrease in resistance for all antibiotics, except colistin, was observed. All these differences are statistically confirmed to be relevant (Chi-square test, p < 0.05). This only applies to isolates obtained from blood samples. Another study from the USA, investigating the resistance of 886 MDR isolates of P. aeruginosa from multiple sample origins, to amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, colistin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, aztreonam, and levofloxacin, showed similar results with ours, regarding the resistance to amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, colistin, imipenem, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam [19]. For most antibiotics, we did not identify significant changes in resistance; however, we identified a significant increase in colistin and amikacin resistance and a significant decrease in piperacillin-tazobactam resistance.
One of the major shortcomings of the studies regarding the analysis of the antimicrobial resistance of bacteria from clinical settings is that screening of the phenotypic resistance widely varies from study to study, and, consequently, the results are different and difficult to compare between distant regions of the globe, highlighting the need for the standardization of antimicrobial resistance testing in order to ensure consistent and accurate results. Considering that phenotypic testing is performed for antibiotics that are commonly used in therapy in different regions, and due to the high spread of ARGs by the horizontal transfer of genes, especially those placed on mobile genetic elements (MGEs), genotypic testing should include genes encoding resistance to different classes of antibiotics.
Our study showed how P. aeruginosa adapts to the continuous pressure exerted by antibiotics in the clinical environment. The intrinsic beta-lactam resistance in P. aeruginosa is attributed to multiple factors, including the reduced membrane permeability resulting from mutations that cause the vanishing of the OprD, the activity of the efflux pumps MexAB-OprM or MexCD-OprJ, and the capacity of the bacteria to produce chromosomally encoded beta-lactamases ampC [20]. We identified some of the genes mexA and mexB which were only found in isolates collected in 2023. Regarding the ampC gene, a decreased prevalence was observed in 2023 compared to 2022.
The development of resistance encoded by blaOXA, GES, TEM, SHV, VIM, IMP, or NDM genes, as well as mutations that attempt to alter the antibiotic target or overexpress efflux systems are the two main causes of bacterial multidrug resistance [21,22]. Out of all mentioned genes, we only identified three of them, blaOXA-50, TEM-1 and blaVIM-1; blaOXA-50 is the most prevalent in the isolates collected in 2022 and 2023, while blaVIM-1 and TEM-1 only appear in isolates collected in 2023. Regarding the mechanisms of resistance, we notice that the isolates collected in 2023 have a higher diversity of beta-lactamases.
Aminoglycosides are also used extensively in the treatment of infections with P. aeruginosa; thus, the predominant resistance mechanism to these antibiotics is mediated by the enzymatic modification of the antibiotic via aminoglycoside-acetyltransferases (AACs), aminoglycoside-adenyltransferases (AADs), and aminoglycoside-phosphotransferases (APHs). These enzymes can also be placed on MGEs, enhancing the widely spread of aphA1, aadB, and aac (6′)-Ib that were the most prevalent genes in analyzed isolates [23]. Our results showed that, in 2022, only one gene encoding resistance to aminoglycosides was identified, aph(2″)-Ib, encoding an aminoglycoside-phosphotransferase, while, in 2023, we identified genes encoding aminoglycoside-acetyltransferases and aminoglycoside-phosphotransferases, as well as aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferases (ant(4′)-Ia). Thus, in 2022, only genes encoding aminoglycoside-phosphotransferases were identified.
Phosphonic acids, another class of antibiotics, are also used to treat infections with P. aeruginosa, in addition to aminoglycosides. Even though this antibiotic is not as widely used anymore, new treatment schemes use it together with β-lactams, aminoglycosides, or colistin [23]. We identified the resistance to phosphonic acid in isolates collected in 2023 mediated by the fosA gene, present in 50% of isolates.
Our study showed that significant differences between 2022 and 2023 appear only in the case of genotypic resistance to sulfonamides and tetracyclines. Regarding the genotypic resistance, a significant increase in the prevalence of the sul1 gene was observed while the ampC gene registered a significant decrease in prevalence. Even though there is a significant difference between 2022 and 2023 regarding the resistance to tetracyclines, the prevalence of the tetA gene showed no significant difference (Chi-test, p < 0.05), meaning that resistance to these antibiotics may be encoded by genes involved in other resistance mechanisms, mainly efflux pumps.
Another objective of our study was studying the changes in the prevalent mechanisms of resistance in P. aeruginosa during 2022–2023. In a broader sense, in 2022, all major mechanisms are present such as antibiotic inactivation, efflux pumps, target replacement, and the modification of the target. In 2023, all of the above-mentioned mechanisms are maintained, with the addition of target protection, as a result of the presence of the qnrB gene. Enzymes such as 6′-N-acetyltransferase (aac(6′)-II), metallo-beta-lactamases (blaVIM-1), thioltransferase (fosA), or nitroreductase (nfsA and nfsB) are newly acquired in 2023, compared to 2022.
The MexAB-OprM efflux pump confers resistance to a wide range of antibiotics: peptides, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, cephalosporins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides [24]. We have identified the mexA and mexB genes in isolates collected in 2023, giving them the ability to survive in the presence of antibiotics even when specific ARGs are not present.
Integrons, playing a crucial role in the dissemination of ARGs, are present in 17% of bacterial chromosomes. A previous study revealed that 58.3% of screened P. aeruginosa isolates harbor class I integrons, while class II and III integrons were absent [25]. Our findings mirrored these results, as we detected class I integrons in 54% of isolates and class III integrons were not found. Notably, we only identified one isolate harboring class II integrons, and, even then, class II integrons were exclusively found in conjunction with class I integrons.
Integrons are known to be carriers of sulfonamide resistance genes [26]. Thus, we have identified a correlation between the presence of sulfonamide resistance genes and integrons (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05). Sabbagh et al. reported that integrons also carry the resistance to aminoglycosides and macrolides [27]. We have found a correlation between the presence of aminoglycoside resistance genes and integrons, but not between the presence of macrolide resistance genes and integrons. We also observed a correlation between integrons and sul1, aph(2″)-Ib, and ermB, with ARGs found in both 2022 and 2023 (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05).
As mentioned before, integrons can play an important role in gene dissemination and the evolution of antimicrobial resistance, as shown in the case of plasmids carrying the blaVIM-1 gene [5]. We have identified this gene in three isolates from 2023, while it was not identified in 2022. It is possible that the plasmid carrying this gene was acquired by the bacterial population during this period. A previous study showed that integrons can facilitate the movement of genes that usually do not disseminate through integrons, especially in polluted environments, mostly the genes encoding resistance to aminoglycosides and beta-lactams. The study identified 296 ARGs that can benefit from integron activity in polluted environments (antibiotics), and 62 of these ARGs can use integrons to move around regardless of the environments [28]. Taking into account our results, the aac(6′)-II, blaVIM-1, sul1, and sul2 genes might benefit from integron activity, regardless of the usual dissemination mechanism of a certain ARG (e.g., via plasmids). Out of all these genes, we only identified a correlation between the presence of sul1 and integrons.
The discovery of blaVIM-1 in the isolates from our study highlights integrons’ crucial role in promoting the acquisition and spread of clinically relevant ARGs. Integrons may also stabilize the expression of genes like blaVIM-1 [5]. This aligns with Wei et al.’s findings that sublethal antibiotic exposure enhances the resistance determinants in E. coli [29]. The exact mechanism of how blaVIM-1 emerged in P. aeruginosa isolates remains unknown, but the integron-mediated dissemination of blaVIM-1 may emerge and amplify under comparable selective pressures. Antibiotic stress may also augment genomic plasticity, contributing to the increased multidrug resistance observed. Thus, integron activity and selective pressure converge to drive the spread of genes like blaVIM-1 in P. aeruginosa populations.
A previous study identified the presence of several beta-lactamases in ESAKAPE pathogens, including blaOXA48, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNDM, and blaKPC. Among these ARGs, we only identified blaVIM, with three isolates harboring this gene, compared to none in the aforementioned study, in the case of P. aeruginosa [30]. In that study, the presence of blaOXA48 was also reported, while we did not identify this gene; however, we identified the blaOXA50 gene.
The information about the mechanism of the resistance to antibiotics in pathogenic bacteria is important for the monitoring of the spreading of the resistant bacteria and ARGs for adapting the treatment schemes. This information can be combined with machine learning [31] in order to predict how ARGs mutate and how antibiotic resistance changes. This new finding could contribute to the understanding of the complex phenomenon of bacterial resistance in order to prevent, and conduct proper management of a new health crisis that is already looming over us.

5. Conclusions

Across only two years, we identified that the antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa isolates from NW Transylvania, Romania has changed. Compared to 2022, in 2023, the emergence of XDR isolates and a decrease in MDR isolates were observed. Moreover, the prevalence of ARGs such as blaOXA-50, sul1, and ermB in isolates collected in 2023 was increased compared to 2022. The emergence of new ARGs in 2023 (sul2, ant(4′)-Ia, VIM-1, and mphC) was also observed, as well as the emergence of the resistance to antibiotic classes not identified in 2022 (quinolones, nitrofurans, and phosphonic acid).
The correlation between the int1 gene and several ARGs such as sul1, aph(2″)-Ib, and ermB demonstrates the key role of class I integrons in the dissemination of these ARGs by HGT. In 2023, all the isolates of P. aeruginosa harbored the int1 gene.
The newly acquired ARGs ensured the diversification of the resistance mechanisms. Moreover, the acquisition of the mexA and mexB genes encoding an efflux pump offers resistance to most antibiotic classes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom15010001/s1, Table S1: PCR primers used and annealing temperatures for ARG and integrase gene amplifications. Table S2. Details about the origin, and phenotypic and genotypic resistance of the P. aeruginosa isolates. Table S3. Antibiotics and ARGs tested in P. aeruginosa isolates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-Ș.D. and A.B.-K.; methodology, M.-Ș.D. and A.B.-K.; investigation, M.-Ș.D., D.-A.Ț. and A.-G.P.; data curation, M.-Ș.D. and D.-A.Ț.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-Ș.D.; writing—review and editing, D.-A.Ț., A.-G.P., C.C. and A.B.-K.; supervision, A.B.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Babeș-Bolyai University and the APC was funded from the doctoral grant of Matei-Ștefan Dobrescu (13517/15446/03.10.2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Bacterial isolates were obtained from hospital screening samples and the article meets national and international guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable for this study.

Data Availability Statement

All information about antibiotic resistance genes were curated from The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (https://card.mcmaster.ca, accessed on 23 October 2024).

Acknowledgments

We thank to Avram Patricia, Bilț Daria, Brudan Alexandra, Hada Raluca, Handragel Mădălina, Pop Denisa, Todoruț Larisa, Trantea Miruna, and Șoimu Gabriela for their laboratory work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

References

  1. Lerminiaux, N.A.; Cameron, A.D.S. Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in clinical environments. Can. J. Microbiol. 2019, 65, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Diallo, O.O.; Baron, S.A.; Abat, C.; Colson, P.; Chaudet, H.; Rolain, J.-M. Antibiotic resistance surveillance systems: A review. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 23, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, T.; Xu, N.; Lu, T.; Hong, W.; Penuelas, J.; Gillings, M.; Wang, M.; Gao, W.; et al. Assessment of global health risk of antibiotic resistance genes. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hall, J.P.J.; Brockhurst, M.A.; Harrison, E. Sampling the mobile gene pool: Innovation via horizontal gene transfer in bacteria. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Souque, C.; Escudero, J.A.; MacLean, R.C. Integron activity accelerates the evolution of antibiotic resistance. eLife 2021, 10, e62474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mulani, M.S.; Kamble, E.E.; Kumkar, S.N.; Tawre, M.S.; Pardesi, K.R. Emerging Strategies to Combat ESKAPE Pathogens in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Arai, H. Regulation and Function of Versatile Aerobic and Anaerobic Respiratory Metabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Motiwala, T.; Mthethwa, Q.; Achilonu, I.; Khoza, T. ESKAPE Pathogens: Looking at Clp ATPases as Potential Drug Targets. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van Duin, D.; Paterson, D.L. Multidrug-resistant bacteria in the community: Trends and lessons learned. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 30, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Oliveira, D.M.P.; Forde, B.M.; Kidd, T.J.; Harris, P.N.A.; Schembri, M.A.; Beatson, S.A.; Paterson, D.L.; Walker, M.J. Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Basak, S.; Singh, P.; Rajurkar, M. Multidrug Resistant and Extensively Drug Resistant Bacteria: A Study. J. Pathog. 2016, 2016, 4065603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arbune, M.; Gurau, G.; Niculet, E.; Iancu, A.V.; Lupasteanu, G.; Fotea, S.; Vasile, M.C.; Tatu, A.L. Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance of ESKAPE Pathogens Over Five Years in an Infectious Diseases Hospital from South-East of Romania. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 2369–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duicu, C.; Cozea, I.; Delean, D.; Aldea, A.A.; Aldea, C. Antibiotic resistance patterns of urinary tract pathogens in children from Central Romania. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ghenea, A.E.; Cioboată, R.; Drocaş, A.I.; Țieranu, E.N.; Vasile, C.M.; Moroşanu, A.; Țieranu, C.G.; Salan, A.-I.; Popescu, M.; Turculeanu, A.; et al. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Klebsiella Strains Isolated from a County Hospital in Romania. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Crăciunaş, C.; Butiuc-Keul, A.; Flonta, M.; Brad, A.; Sigarteu, M. Application of molecular techniques to the study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Ann. Oradea Univ. Biol. Fascicle 2010, 17, 243–247. [Google Scholar]
  16. Holmes, S.H.; Huber, W. Modern Statistics for Modern Biology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Alcock, B.P.; Huynh, W.; Chalil, R.; Smith, K.W.; Raphenya, A.R.; A Wlodarski, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Petkau, A.; A Syed, S.; Tsang, K.K.; et al. CARD 2023: Expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D690–D699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Recio, R.; Mancheño, M.; Viedma, E.; Villa, J.; Orellana, M.; Lora-Tamayo, J.; Chaves, F. Predictors of Mortality in Bloodstream Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance and Bacterial Virulence. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01759-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Karlowsky, J.A.; Lob, S.H.; Raddatz, J.; DePestel, D.D.; Young, K.; Motyl, M.R.; Sahm, D.F. In Vitro Activity of Imipenem/Relebactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against Clinical Isolates of Gram-negative Bacilli With Difficult-to-Treat Resistance and Multidrug-resistant Phenotypes—Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends, United States 2015–2017. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 72, 2112–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Azam, M.W.; Khan, A.U. Updates on the pathogenicity status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Drug Discov. Today 2018, 24, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bassetti, M.; Vena, A.; Croxatto, A.; Righi, E.; Guery, B. How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs Context 2018, 7, 212527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pang, Z.; Raudonis, R.; Glick, B.R.; Lin, T.J.; Cheng, Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kothari, A.; Kherdekar, R.; Mago, V.; Uniyal, M.; Mamgain, G.; Kalia, R.B.; Kumar, S.; Jain, N.; Pandey, A.; Omar, B.J. Age of Antibiotic Resistance in MDR/XDR Clinical Pathogen of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Choudhury, D.; Ghosh, A.; Dhar Chanda, D.; Das Talukdar, A.; Dutta Choudhury, M.; Paul, D.; Maurya, A.P.; Chakravorty, A.; Bhattacharjee, A. Premature termination of MexR leads to overexpression of MexAB-OprM efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary referral hospital in India. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149156. [Google Scholar]
  25. Khademi, F.; Ashrafi, S.S.; Neyestani, Z.; Vaez, H.; Sahebkar, A. Prevalence of class I, II and III integrons in multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Gene Rep. 2021, 25, 101407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Domínguez, M.; Miranda, C.D.; Fuentes, O.; De La Fuente, M.; Godoy, F.A.; Bello-Toledo, H.; González-Rocha, G. Occurrence of transferable integrons and sul and dfr genes among sulfonamide-and/or trimethoprim-resistant bacteria isolated from Chilean salmonid farms. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sabbagh, P.; Rajabnia, M.; Maali, A.; Ferdosi-Shahandashti, E. Integron and its role in antimicrobial resistance: A literature review on some bacterial pathogens. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2021, 24, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. An, R.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, X.X.; Ma, L. Xenogenetic evolutionary of integrons promotes the environmental pollution of antibiotic resistance genes—Challenges, progress and prospects. Water Res. 2023, 231, 119629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wei, D.W.; Wong, N.K.; Song, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wang, C.; Li, J.; Feng, J. IS26 veers genomic plasticity and genetic rearrangement toward carbapenem hyperresistance under sublethal antibiotics. MBio 2022, 13, e0334021. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vintilă, C.; Coșeriu, R.L.; Mare, A.D.; Ciurea, C.N.; Togănel, R.O.; Simion, A.; Cighir, A.; Man, A. Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Resistance Profiles in Carbapenemase-Producing Gram-Negative Rods—A Comparative Analysis between Screening and Pathological Isolates. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khaledi, A.; Weimann, A.; Schniederjans, M.; Asgari, E.; Kuo, T.; Oliver, A.; Cabot, G.; Kola, A.; Gastmeier, P.; Hogardt, M.; et al. Predicting antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa with machine learning-enabled molecular diagnostics. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e10264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Workflow of the analysis of the antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa isolates.
Figure 1. Workflow of the analysis of the antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa isolates.
Biomolecules 15 00001 g001
Figure 2. Prevalence of commonly identified ARGs in P. aeruginosa isolates between 2022 and 2023.
Figure 2. Prevalence of commonly identified ARGs in P. aeruginosa isolates between 2022 and 2023.
Biomolecules 15 00001 g002
Figure 3. Prevalence of ARGs in P. aeruginosa isolates by year.
Figure 3. Prevalence of ARGs in P. aeruginosa isolates by year.
Biomolecules 15 00001 g003
Figure 4. Prevalence of genotypic resistance to commonly identified classes of antibiotics in P. aeruginosa isolates between 2022 and 2023.
Figure 4. Prevalence of genotypic resistance to commonly identified classes of antibiotics in P. aeruginosa isolates between 2022 and 2023.
Biomolecules 15 00001 g004
Figure 5. Prevalence of MDR P. aeruginosa isolates between 2022 (a) and 2023 (b).
Figure 5. Prevalence of MDR P. aeruginosa isolates between 2022 (a) and 2023 (b).
Biomolecules 15 00001 g005
Figure 6. Prevalence of integrons in P. aeruginosa isolates between 2022 and 2023.
Figure 6. Prevalence of integrons in P. aeruginosa isolates between 2022 and 2023.
Biomolecules 15 00001 g006
Table 1. Classification of analyzed ARGs in P. aeruginosa isolates by antibiotic class, resistance mechanism, and dissemination [17].
Table 1. Classification of analyzed ARGs in P. aeruginosa isolates by antibiotic class, resistance mechanism, and dissemination [17].
ARGClassResistance MechanismDetailed MechanismDissemination
aac(6′)-II 3AminoglycosideAntibiotic inactivation6′-N-acetyltransferase
ant(4′)-Ia 3nucleotidyltransferaseplasmid
AAC(6′)-Ie-APH(2″)-Ia 3acetyltransferaseplasmid, transposon
aph(2″)-Ib 2phosphotransferasechromosome
aac(3)-I 33-N-acetyltransferase
aac(6′)-Im 3acetyltransferaseplasmid
blaOXA-50 2Beta-lactamserine beta-lactamasechromosome
VIM-1 3metallo-beta-lactamaseplasmid
ampC 2serine beta-lactamasechromosome
TEM-1 3serine beta-lactamase
amp 1
sul1 2SulfonamideTarget replacementdihydropteroate synthaseintegron
sul2 3plasmid
tetA 2TetracyclineEfflux pump
tetC 3plasmid
tetK 3
qnrB 3QuinoloneTarget protection
ermA 1MacrolideTarget modification
ermB 2
ermC 3methylation of 23S rRNA
mphC 3Antibiotic inactivation
fosA 3Phosphonic acidthiol transferasechromosome
nfsA 3NitrofuranTarget modificationnitroreductase
nfsB 3
mexA 3Broad-spectrumEfflux pump chromosome
mexB 3
1 ARGs identified only in isolates collected in 2022; 2 ARGs identified in isolates collected in 2022 and 2023; 3 ARGs identified only in isolates collected in 2023.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dobrescu, M.-Ș.; Țoc, D.-A.; Pană, A.-G.; Costache, C.; Butiuc-Keul, A. The Difference a Year Can Make: How Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Have Changed in Northwestern Transylvania. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010001

AMA Style

Dobrescu M-Ș, Țoc D-A, Pană A-G, Costache C, Butiuc-Keul A. The Difference a Year Can Make: How Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Have Changed in Northwestern Transylvania. Biomolecules. 2025; 15(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dobrescu, Matei-Ștefan, Dan-Alexandru Țoc, Adrian-Gabriel Pană, Carmen Costache, and Anca Butiuc-Keul. 2025. "The Difference a Year Can Make: How Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Have Changed in Northwestern Transylvania" Biomolecules 15, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010001

APA Style

Dobrescu, M. -Ș., Țoc, D. -A., Pană, A. -G., Costache, C., & Butiuc-Keul, A. (2025). The Difference a Year Can Make: How Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Have Changed in Northwestern Transylvania. Biomolecules, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010001

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop