Next Article in Journal
Acral Melanoma: A Review of Its Pathogenesis, Progression, and Management
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Environmental Factors in Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Injectable Tannin-Containing Hydroxypropyl Chitin Hydrogel as Novel Bioactive Pulp Capping Material Accelerates Repair of Inflamed Dental Pulp
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Roadmap for Designing Donor-π-Acceptor Fluorophores in UV-Vis and NIR Regions: Synthesis, Optical Properties and Applications

1
Department of Chemistry, Molecular Basis of Disease, Petit Science Center, Georgia State University, 100 Piedmont Avenue SE, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
2
Center of Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, 100 Piedmont Avenue SE, Atlanta, GA 30303-5090, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2025, 15(1), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010119
Submission received: 1 October 2024 / Revised: 3 January 2025 / Accepted: 7 January 2025 / Published: 14 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Materials for Biomedical Applications: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Donor acceptor (D- π -A) fluorophores containing a donor unit and an acceptor moiety at each end connected by a conjugated linker gained attention in the last decade due to their conjugated system and ease of tunability. These features make them good candidates for various applications such as bioimaging, photovoltaic devices and nonlinear optical materials. Upon excitation of the D- π -A fluorophore, intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) occurs, and it polarizes the molecule resulting in the ‘push–pull’ system. The emission wavelengths of fluorophores can be altered from UV-vis to NIR region by modifying the donor unit, acceptor moiety and the π linker between them. The NIR emitting fluorophores with restricted molecular rotations are used in aggregation-induced emission (AIE). D- π -A fluorophores with carboxylic acid and cyano groups are preferred in photovoltaic applications, and fluorophores with large surface area are used for two photon absorbing applications. Herein, we report the synthesis, optical properties, and applications of various D- π -A fluorophores in UV-vis and NIR region.

1. Introduction

Donor acceptor (D- π -A) fluorophores with a conjugated π system attracted attention in the last decade. D- π -A fluorophores have a donor group and an acceptor moiety at each end connected by a conjugated π linker system (Figure 1). The π linker system can be a polymethine chain, a heteroatomic or an aromatic molecule [1]. When the D- π -A molecule becomes excited by absorption of a photon, intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) occurs, creating a push–pull system, the donor group being push and the acceptor moiety being pull units. The key to creating a push–pull system is appropriately modifying the molecule. Some examples of these systems do not have a linker unit between donor and acceptor units [2,3]. These scaffolds can be fluorescent due to their conjugated moieties. Similarly, the charge transfer occurs between donor and acceptor units upon photoexcitation, resulting in ICT [4]. However, the linker addition in between can allow a more significant number of modifications to shift the wavelengths to the near-infrared region. Therefore, in this review are focusing on the donor acceptor fluorophores with linker units by presenting various examples.
The NIR window is useful for bioimaging applications since there is less autofluorescence from biomolecules and tissues [5], therefore, D- π -A fluorophores can be modified by changing the donor and acceptor units to have absorbance in NIR. One of the advantages of D- π -A fluorophores is their tunable structure. These fluorophores can be modified by basically three ways: alternation of the donor unit, changing the length of the π linker and alternation of the acceptor moiety. The length of the π system is important due to the spatial rearrangement of the fluorophore. Heteroatomic systems like thiophene may improve the polarization and stabilize the conformation of the fluorophore [6]. Some of the donor units used in the literature are: N,N-dialkylamino [6], N,N-diphenylamino [6], indoline [7], fluorene [8], carbazole [8] and alkoxy groups [6]. The most used acceptor units are; cyano [6], nitro [6], trifluoromethyl [9], carboxylic acid [6], pentafluorosulfur [9], nitrile [6] and benzothiazole [10]. In addition to these groups, halides can be used as acceptors due to their electron withdrawing properties.
The D- π -A fluorophores are sensitive to their environment, therefore, while measuring the spectroscopic properties, the polarity of the solvent affects the absorption and emission spectra [11]. This property of the molecules is known as solvatochromism [12]. The interaction between the fluorophore and solvent affects the ICT and shifts the absorption spectra, as well as changing the Stokes shift [13,14]. It is favorable to have a larger Stokes shift separating absorbance and fluorescence wavelengths and dyes with extended conjugation systems were able to reach that [14]. It has been reported that both dipole-dipole interactions and hydrogen bonding can promote the bathochromic shift of emission spectra by stabilizing the excited energy level of the fluorophore [13]. Rigidity of the fluorophore is another subject that is addressed by researchers discussing how the more rigid and conjugated the structure is, the brighter and more red shifted absorbance can be obtained [15,16].
This review specifically focuses on D-π-A fluorophores with various moieties and geometries published after 2014.

2. D- π -A Fluorophores in the UV-Vis Region

The majority of D- π -A fluorophores reported so far are in the UV-vis region. The synthesis and photochemical properties of fluorophores in the UV-vis region with different donor and acceptor units, and π linkers, will be discussed in this section.

2.1. Pentafluorosulfonyl (SF5) Acceptor Group

It is known that trifluoromethyl (CF3) is a strong electron withdrawing group, on the other hand, it was reported that the SF5 group has much stronger electron withdrawing effect. W. Sheppard reported the synthesis of arylsulfur pentafluorides [17] and studied the electron withdrawing effect of the SF5 group which showed a greater inductive effect than CF3 [18]. Due to this strong electron withdrawing effect, Gautam et al. used pentafluorosulfonyl (SF5) as an acceptor group for the synthesis of push–pull fluorophores [9]. In their study, they synthesized dyes with diphenylamino as the donor unit and SF5 as the acceptor unit connected with different π systems via Pd catalyzed coupling reactions [9]. The general scaffold of D- π -A system is schematically represented in Figure 2.
The structures of synthesized dyes from 1af with different π units are shown in Figure 3. Fluorophore 1a was synthesized via Suzuki coupling, 1b and 1e were synthesized via Heck coupling, and 1c, 1d and 1f were synthesized via the Sonogashira reaction. As an example, the synthesis of 1a, 1c and 1e were shown in Scheme 1. The syntheses for 1a1e start from bromo(pentafluorosulfanyl)benzene and couple with different precursors via Pd catalysts. The photophysical properties of dyes were investigated in dichloromethane (DCM), toluene and acetone. The dyes 1af showed absorbance maxima between 344 and 407 nm, and had fluorescence maxima between 449 and 506 nm. Compounds 1df showed a bathochromic shift which is a result of ICT in their longer π system. The quantum efficiencies of 1df, 0.40, 0.23 and 0.48 were significantly higher than 1ac which were 0.016, 0.20 and 0.18, respectively [9].
Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) studies showed that the HOMO was located at the diphenylamino donor group and LUMO was located at the SF5 acceptor moiety. As presented in Figure 4, the band gap decreases from 3.80 eV to 2.81 eV for fluorophores 1df when compared with fluorophores 1ac. In the case of 1f, the addition of the thiophene unit lowered both HOMO and LUMO levels with a band gap of 2.84 eV. This study shows that increasing the conjugation and adding an heteroatomic unit to the π linker system decreases the band gap and results in a bathochromic shift. Although SF5 is seen as a good electron acceptor unit, the fluorescence signals were in the UV-vis region [9].

2.2. Diazines

Diazines are heterocyclic dinitrogen atoms containing aromatic molecules [19]. Two nitrogen atoms in the diazine structure do not contribute to the aromaticity of the molecule so the structure acts as a relatively electron-deficient system [20]. In particular, pyridazine and pyrimidine are used as acceptor units in D- π -A molecules due to their aromaticity and enhancing intramolecular charge transfer characteristics [21]. An example of using diazines as acceptor units with an extended linker unit was reported by Achelle et al. [22]. The diazine containing chromophores 5ae, 6ae and 7ae with long π systems were synthesized via the Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction for nonlinear optical (NLO) applications [22]. The fluorophores 5 and 7 both contain a pyrimidine acceptor unit, however, they differ in the linker unit as phenyl and thienyl rings, respectively. Fluorophore 6 has a quinoxaline acceptor and a linker unit containing a phenyl ring. The synthesis of these fluorophores with a diazine acceptor unit and different R groups as donor units such as phenyl, methoxyphenyl, dimethylaminophenyl, diphenylaminophenyl, trimethylsilane and hydrogen are given in Scheme 2. The starting compounds 24 were synthesized by the condensation of 4-methylpyrimidine or 2-quinoaxaline, an aldehyde under basic conditio and Aliquat 336 (phase transfer catalyst) to yield the E-conformation as reported by Vanden Eynde earlier [23]. Compounds 57f were synthesized by cleaving the trimethylsilane group on 57e by potassium hydroxide in methanol [22].
The optical studies of the derivatives from molecules 57 were measured in DCM showing absorbance wavelength maxima around 312–419 nm, and emission spectra between 420 and 630 nm in the UV-vis region. The compounds have large Stokes shifts, and they did not show E–Z isomerization. When the two different diazine units, pyrimidine (5) and quinoxaline (6), were compared, 5ad had λ em = 420–612 nm and 6ad had λ em = 447–647 nm, resulting in a red shift for fluorophore 6. The thienyl ring containing π linker 7ad had λ em = 462–607 nm. For molecules containing pyrimidine and quinoxaline acceptor units, dimethylaminophenyl (c) and diphenylaminophenyl (d) were the most bathochromic shifted. In the case of the pyrimidine acceptor with the thienyl unit, 7c showed the highest quantum yield Φ = 0.80. Fluorophore 5c ( Φ = 0.54) showed a higher quantum yield than 7c ( Φ = 0.07). The investigation of photophysical properties of the compounds in aprotic solvents showed the solvatochromic behavior of the fluorophores. With increasing solvent polarity, a bathochromic shift was observed for the emission band while the absorption band did not show significant changes [22]. The benzene ring consisting of one more nitrogen atom, which is called triazine, can also be used to make donor acceptor scaffolds and can find applications as viscosity sensors [24].

2.3. Thiophene and Thienothiophenes

Thiophenes are heterocycles similar to cyclopentadiene which contain a sulfur atom, and the lone pair on the sulfur atom contributes to the aromaticity of the ring since the p orbital on sulfur is conjugated to the p orbitals of the heterocycle. Thiophene heterocycles can be used as donor or linker units. An example with thiophene donor units was reported by Peng et al. where two different systems contain triazine and benzene cores, and both systems showed absorbance in the UV-vis region [25]. Balakirev et al. reported donor acceptor fluorophores with a thiophene linker unit where the scaffold has a triphenyl amine donor and several acceptor units [26]. Arahchige et al. reported a thiophene linker containing fluorophores with quinolinium units which has emission in the NIR region upon being reduced with a NAD(P)H addition [27].
In 2016, Manuela et al. reported the synthesis of thienothiophene containing fluorophores using two different sets of Suzuki cross-coupling reactions, which are given in Scheme 3. TT is used as the π linker, dicyanovinyl and thiobarbituric acid groups are used as acceptor units, and various donor units were compared according to their optical properties. While compounds 8ad containing only the donor unit with the aldehyde group at the other end had λem = 413–545 nm, fluorophores 9ad and 10a, b, d showed a bathochromic shift due to the addition of strong acceptor units dicyano and thiobarbituric acid, instead of the aldehyde group. Compound 10d specifically had fluorescence in the NIR region as λem = 710 nm [28].
Thienothiophene (TT) has an aromatic structure consisting of two fused thiophene rings. Thionothiophenes have four isomers: thieno[3,2,b]thiophene 11 in Scheme 4, thieno[2,3,b]thiophene 12 in Scheme 4, thieno[3,4,b]thiophene and thieno[3,4,c]thiophene [29]. The first two isomers are used as the examples given in this section. The conjugated and rigid structure of thienothiophenes make them good candidates as linker units in donor acceptor fluorophores.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of chromophores with TT linker system.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of chromophores with TT linker system.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch003
Thienothiophenes also have an electron-donating character due to the lone pair electrons on sulfur atoms [29]. Podlesny et al. used thieno[2,3,b]thiphene 11 and thieno[3,2,b]thiophene 12 as donor units and investigated their properties with various acceptor units. The synthesis of the fluorophores with some of the selected acceptor units such as indan-1,3-dione (a), N,N-diethylthiobarbituaric acid (b), ThDione (c) and malononitrile (d) are presented in Scheme 4 [30]. The first step of synthesizing fluorophores 14 and 16 was the Vilsmeier Haack reaction by reacting POCl3 with DMF followed by the dropwise addition of 11 or 12. The last step of the synthesis was Knoevenagel condensation with Al2O3 in DMF to yield compounds 14 and 16. In another study, Podlesny et al. used thieno[3,2,b]thiophene (12) as a donor unit and reported the synthesis of D-π-A fluorophores with different acceptor units and a butadiene linker in between, which makes the fluorophore undergo E/Z isomerization upon light (Scheme 4) [31]. The synthesis of compound 17 was not successful via the Vilsmeier Haack reaction, therefore it was synthesized by 3-(N,N dimethylamino) acrolein with LDA. The second step was the Knoevenagel condensation to yield chromophore 18 E/Z isomers in the light and only E isomer when performed in the dark. The E/Z isomers were characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopies, and it was concluded that the photoisomerization was affected by the acceptor unit [31].
The absorbance spectra of compounds 14ad and 16ad are measured in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The absorption maxima of fluorophores 14ad ranges from 383 to 444 nm, whereas the absorption maxima of fluorophore 16ad are in the range of 389–446 nm, with the lowest λ max for compounds 14d and 16d with the malononitrile acceptor, and the highest λ max for fluorophores 14b and 16b with the barbituric acid acceptor units [30]. The absorbance maxima for 18ad was reported as being between 428 and 479 nm in DMF, showing a bathochromic shift upon the addition of an additional HC=CH bond specifically for 18a and 18b. The DFT studies of the chromophores show the largest band gap exists for 14b, 16b and 14d; 16d have a smaller band gap, and compounds 18ad have a larger band gap which is observed for E isomers [31].
Scheme 4. Synthesis of fluorophores using TT as donor group.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of fluorophores using TT as donor group.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch004

2.4. Nonlinear D- π -A Fluorophores

In addition to the linear D- π -A-shaped fluorophores, different types of scaffold can be designed, such as tripolar (D(- π -A)3) and quadrupolar (D- π -A- π -D) structures, which are illustrated in Figure 5 [6]. The conjugation in these systems is higher than that in the linear D- π -A fluorophores since they have three donor or acceptor groups. They are good candidates for multiphoton absorption (MPA) due to their high conjugated system. Here, two different examples will be discussed, D-π-A fluorophores with triphenylamine and a pyrimidine core.
Figure 5. Tripodal and quadrupolar donor acceptor structures.
Figure 5. Tripodal and quadrupolar donor acceptor structures.
Biomolecules 15 00119 g005

2.4.1. Triphenylamine Core

Tripodal, also known as star-shaped D(- π -A)3 and (D- π -)3A structures, are examples of different spatially arranged D- π -A fluorophores. In recent years, triphenylamine containing fluorophores have been synthesized, which have triphenylamine in the middle and different groups attached by the π linkers [8,32,33]. Triphenylamine is preferred for the synthesis of tripolar structures since it has C3 symmetry, a coplanar structure and an efficient synthesis of the molecule with different groups [34]. Cvejn et al. synthesized star-shaped fluorophores using triphenylamine as the core unit in the middle [34]. The syntheses of different fluorophores were followed by Suzuki-Miyoura, Sonogashira and Heck-Mizoroki reactions [34]. The syntheses of the core structures are shown in Scheme 5.
Triiodo compound 20a was synthesized from commercially available triphenylamine (19) in two ways, as reported by Cvejn et al. The first method reported using the HgO/I2 system which resulted in a high yield but low selectivity towards mono- and bisubstituted products. Therefore, as a second method, they carried out the synthesis with the AgNO3/I2/EtOH system, which yielded the desired products with reasonable yields. Compound 20b was synthesized from tris(4-iodophenyl) amine, trimethylsilylacetylene (TMSA), tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) and Pd catalyst by the threefold Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction. Then, starting from 20a and propargyl alcohol, fluorophore 20c was synthesized via another threefold Sonogashira coupling, and 20d was synthesized by the oxidation of fluorophore 20c by the Dess Martin periodinane reagent [33,34].
Fluorophores 57 reported earlier in Scheme 2 were reacted with tris(4-ethynylphenylamine) (20b) starting with Pd (0) precatalysts, diisopropylamine and 1,4 dioxane via three-times Sonogashira coupling at 92 °C to yield tripolar fluorophores 2124 given in Figure 6. Fluorophore 25, which has a pyrazine ring, was synthesized by a different method using potassium hydroxide in DMSO since the yield was low for the method used for 2124 due to the low acidity of the methyl hydrogens [32]. The compounds 2125 have an emission between 555 and 630 nm with high quantum yields Φ = 0.37–0.67. Fluorophores 23 and 24 have a bathochromic shift which may be due to the higher π conjugation and rigidity of the quinoxaline ring. The addition of the thienylene ring instead of phenylene resulted in a bathochromic shift for compound 22 but a blue shift for compound 24 which has a quinoxaline ring, which may arise due to the disruption of the coplanar structure in fluorophore 24 [32].
In another study reported by Cvejn et al., fluorophores with mono- and dicyano groups (2629) were synthesized via a threefold coupling reaction [34]. Fluorophore 26 was synthesized from (4-cyanophenyl) boronic acid and 20a via the Suzuki coupling reaction. Fluorophore 27 with dicyanovinyl acceptor was synthesized via Al2O3 catalyzed Knoevenagel condensation reacting malononitrile and 20e with a high yield. Fluorophores 28 and 29 were synthesized via the Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction starting from 20b, 2-bromoisophthalonitrile and 2-iodothiophene-3,4-dicarbonitrile, respectively. The fluorophores 2629 have an absorption between 448 and 611 nm, fluorophore 27 having the one with the highest bathochromic shift. The highest quantum yields observed for fluorophores 26 and 28 were 0.64 and 0.69, respectively [34].

2.4.2. Pyrimidine Core

In addition to the triphenylamine ring, there are examples of a pyrimidine ring used as the core of an octupolar structure [35]. The electron-deficient character of pyrimidine also makes it useful as an acceptor unit. The synthesis of 2-ethynyl-4,6-bis(arylvinyl)pyrimidines was reported by Martin et al. [35] and given in Scheme 6. The 2-iodo-4,6-dimethylpyrimidine 30 was reacted with an aldehyde which has a donor group represented as D: dimethylamino (a), dibutylamino (b) and methoxy (c) groups to yield 31ac. Fluorophores 32ac were synthesized from 31ac by two steps, shown as i and ii in Scheme 6. The optical studies of fluorophores were conducted in DCM and Stokes shifts were between 93 and 105 nm. Fluorophores 32ac had absorbance maxima of 440, 455 and 364 nm, and emission maxima of 545, 547 and 457 nm, respectively. Fluorophore 32c, which had methoxy as the donor group, showed the least quantum efficiency at 0.02, while the quantum efficiency of 32a and 32b were 0.47 and 0.52 [35]. The triple bond in the linker unit was preferred since it gave a coplanar structure and increased stability.
Kournotuas et al. studied the photophysical properties of the pyrimidine acceptor containing fluorophores 33a,b37a,b with dimethylamino (a) and diphenylamino (b) donors [36]. Fluorophores 33a,b and 34a,b were synthesized from 4-methyl pyrimidine and benzaldehyde (1 and 2 equivalence, respectively) with a donor unit, using Aliquat 366 catalyst under basic conditions, as presented in Scheme 7 [37,38].
The synthesis of 37a,b was reported using a three-step synthetic route, presented in Scheme 8, by Feckova et al. [39]. The first step is C4 regioselective Suzuki-Miyaura coupling with styrylboronic acid, starting from 2,4-dichloro-6-methyl pyrimidine, to yield 35a,b. This step is followed by another Suzuki-Miyaura coupling at the C2 position. The molecular optimizations showed that the molecules have a planar backbone, whereas the diphenylamino group has a propeller shape. The photophysical studies were performed in DCM, absorbances were between 392 and 426 nm, and the dyes had an emission between 493 and 538 nm. The highest bathochromic shift and quantum efficiencies were seen for dyes 34b and 37b with the diphenylamino group. The fluorophores showed solvatochromic properties and large Stokes shifts in various solvents.

2.5. Fluorene as Linker Unit

Fluorene is another molecule that is used for the synthesis of D- π -A fluorophores. Fluorenes are highly conjugated, rigid and have a planar structure promoting red shifted absorbance. Shaya and coworkers reported the synthesis of 2,7-disubstituted fluorene containing fluorophores and studied their optical properties. Dimethylamine and several heterocycles were used as the donor units, and various acceptor units were studied [40]. The general structure of fluorene containing fluorophores is shown in Figure 7.
The synthesis of fluorene containing fluorophores and their different acceptor groups are outlined in Scheme 9. The first step of the synthesis is the dimethylation of the carbon at position 9. The second step is the regioselective mononitration of C7 followed by the reduction with iron and ammonium chloride to afford the amino group. This is followed by reductive amination using NaCNBH3 and paraformaldehyde to obtain compound 40, which contains the dimethylamino group as a donor and different groups as acceptors. Compound 40a with an aldehyde unit was synthesized via formylation with n-BuLi. Compound 40b was synthesized in two steps starting with the Grignard reaction for adding the ethynyl group, and this followed by oxidation with MnO2 to obtain the ketone structure with a high yield. Knoevenagel condensation was carried out to synthesize 40b by methylenemalonitrile and Al2O3. After the generation of stannyl fluorene in situ, 40c was obtained by coupling it with the benzothiadiazole ring. For 40d that was peptide functionalized, first the succinic linker was attached to the R position by the Grignard reaction of 40 and succinyl anhydride in THF at 60 °C, then this was followed by the ligation reaction of n-butyl amine and two activators, N,N-diisopropylcarbodiimide and I-hydroxybenzotriazole [40].
The spectroscopic studies of fluorophores 40ad were performed in various solvents such as water, ethanol, acetonitrile, DMSO, chloroform, dioxane and toluene. In water, all fluorophores had emissions above 600 nm, and fluorophore 40b showed the highest red shift at 682 nm. In DMSO, ethanol and acetonitrile 40b and d showed a bathochromic shift, and for 40b the emission was in NIR region in DMSO as λ em = 710 nm. The ethynyl group containing 40a had a significant bathochromic shift and the most significant difference was in acetonitrile from 521 nm to 620 nm. The addition of a benzothiadiazole ring showed a blue shift of the fluorophore 40c, which had an emission only in aprotic and nonpolar solvents [40].
Another example of fluorophores with a fluorene linker is presented in Scheme 10. The synthesis of fluorophore 43, which has a diphenylamine donor and benzothiazole acceptor units, was reported by Kannan et al. via a Pd-catalyzed amination reaction starting from 7-bromo-9,9-diethyl-9H-fluorene-2-carbaldehyde 42 [41]. First, the carbaldehyde 41 was reacted with 2-aminobenzenethiol in DMSO to form the precursor compound 42. Then, the copper-catalyzed reaction of 42 with diphenylamine in the presence of 18-crown-6 and potassium carbonate yielded fluorophore 43. The absorbance spectra of 43 showed absorbance and emission maxima at 392 and 475 nm, respectively in THF.
Kannan et al. also reported the synthesis of diphenylamine donor fluorenes with different type of acceptors such as 2-benzothiazolyl, benzoyl, 2-(4-pyridyl)-vinyl, 2-benzoxazolyl, 2-quinoxalinyl, 2-(N-phenylbenzimidazolyl and 2-(4,5-diphenylimidazolyl) [41]. The synthesis of fluorophore 45 with dibenzothiazole units was reported by Belfield et al. starting from 9,9-diethyl-9H-fluorene-2,7-dicarbaldehyde 44 and 2-(tri-n-butylstannyl)-benzothiazole via Pd catalyzed Stille coupling [42]. The absorbance spectra of 45 in THF showed three peaks with maxima at 358, 375 and 398 nm [43]. The synthesis of fluorophore 47 with diphenylamino groups was reported by Stewart et al. via a Pd catalyzed reaction [43]. The absorbance and emission of fluorophore 47 were 380 and 396 nm, respectively, in THF. The fluorophores 43 and 47 showed large Stokes shifts in polar and nonpolar solvents. The quantum yields of fluorophores 43, 45 and 47 were between 42 and 80% in various solvents [10].

2.6. Carbazoles as Linker and Acceptor Unit

Carbazoles are another example of moieties commonly used in D- π -A fluorophores. Similar to fluorenes, they also have a planar structure. The difference between carbazoles and fluorenes is the nitrogen atom which makes the structure more electron-rich and conjugated [44]. Carbazoles can be modified at 3 and 6 positions to give mono- and disubstituted products. As an example, Raikwar et al. synthesized carbazole containing fluorophores with D1- π -A- π -D2 structures, as outlined in Scheme 11 [45]. In this system, D1 is the carbazole unit, the acceptor is the dicyano vinylene and D2 represents three different donor units. The first step to synthesize 1-(9-ethyl-9H-carbazol-3-yl) ethan-1-one 49 was reported by R. Tang and W. Zhang earlier [46]. They synthesized monosubstituted carbazole with Friedel-Crafts acetylation using ZnCl2 as the catalyst; while AlCl3 gave both mono- and disubstituted products, ZnCl2 gave monosubstituted as the main product. The difference arises from the high acidity of AlCl3 and the mild acidity of ZnCl2. Then, intermediate 49 was reacted with malononitrile undergoing Knoevenagel condensation to give compound 50. Finally, the malononitrile functionalized carbazole reacted with the commercial aldehydes to yield fluorophores 51ac [46].
The absorption and emission studies of the three fluorophores with different D2 units were conducted in CHCl3. Fluorophores 51ac have absorption maxima at 492, 494 and 532 nm, respectively. According to the studies, structures of 51a and 51b were not planar because of the free rotation around the double bond connecting D2 to the carbazole structure. On the other hand, compound 51c is planar and rigid, with a better π conjugation, which explains the red shift in absorbance. The emissions of fluorophores 51ac were 570 nm, 615 nm and 603 nm, respectively. Fluorophore 51b has the most bathochromic shifted emission, and this may be due to the stronger electron donating effect of the diphenyl group than the julolidine group. The effect of solvent polarity on the absorbance of dyes was also investigated. Fluorophores 51a and b were not affected by the polarity of the solvent, whereas 51c was affected. DFT studies were conducted to find the optimized geometries of the molecules, and their bond lengths and strengths. According to these studies, fluorophores showed a shorter bond length in polar solvents. The geometric optimization of the structures showed that the D2 unit is planar with the acceptor unit, but the D1 unit is not planar to them. While the angle between the D2 and the acceptor units is 4–6°, the angle between the D1 and acceptor units is 39–42°, which shows that the D1 unit is not planar, therefore, the HOMO is on D2 and LUMO is on the acceptor [45].
Another set of fluorophores with a carbazole donor, oligothiophene linker and cyanoacetic acid acceptor were reported by Wang et al. [47]. Later, Sutton et al. reported the synthesis of fluorophores 5557, which have a modified length of thiophene π bridge [48]. They investigated the effect of distance between donor and acceptor groups by changing the length of the thiophene linker.
The first set of fluorophores 5557 were synthesized by Wittig condensation starting from triphenylmethyl(9-octyl-carbazole-3-yl) phosphonium bromide 52 and 2,5-dicarbaldehyde thiophene and 1,8-diazobicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU), as illustrated in Scheme 12 [48]. This process was followed by a reaction with trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate in dry diethyl ether and ethyl diisopropyl amine to synthesize fluorophores 5557. The R group on the acceptor corresponds to the OH and OCH3 groups for fluorophores 5557a and 5557b, respectively.
The second set of fluorophores 60 and 61 have a monothiophene bridge between the donor and acceptor units. Fluorophores were synthesized by the Suzuki coupling reaction starting from 3-iodo-9-octylcarbazole 58 and 5-formylthienyl boronic acid catalyzed by Pd (PPh3)4 in THF under an argon atmosphere by 4-h reflux, as shown in Scheme 13. This was followed by Knoevenagel condensation of the aldehyde with cyanoacetic acid. Fluorophores 60 and 61 were synthesized according to the same Knoevenagel condensation and cyanoacrylic acid esterification procedures, as reported earlier [48]. The absorption of the fluorophores was between 470 and 485 nm, and the bathochromic shift was observed for four and six thiophene containing bridges. To understand the effect of the bridge length, the photophysical properties and TD-DFT studies were performed. According to the electronic absorption studies, increasing the bridge length promotes a bathochromic shift of λ max for both a and b compounds (Scheme 12). When bithiophene and monothiophene are compared, there is a 0.11 eV shift. However, when one more thiophene unit is added, for terthiophene the shift is 0.01 eV. This difference in the shift is reported due to the rotation around the thiophene bridge which may have disturbed the conjugation. However, for this structure, while bithiophene in closer to planarity, terthiophene may be disturbed planarity. According to the calculated ground state conformations, the 56a and 56b prefer the anti- and 57a and 57b prefer anti-anti conformations. Using TD-DFT studies, they reported that when the fluorophores are excited, ICT occurs from carbazole to the acceptor unit through the thiophene bridge. The increase in bridge length decreases the electron density transferred from carbazole to the acceptor, while increasing the dihedral angle from 55a,b to 57a,b promotes ICT. The solvent effect on the photophysical properties of dyes was investigated using different solvents, and while the a compound showed high solvatochromism, the b compound was less affected. When the solvatochromic behavior of 55a was investigated, it was reported that the deprotonation of the cyanocarboxylate unit may be causing this unusual behavior. The emission studies showed a small difference in the λ em of 61. On the other hand, 56a, 57a and b showed a high bathochromic shift as λ em = 703, 715 and 701 nm, respectively [48].
Another set of fluorophores with carbazoles was reported by Zheng et al. [49]. The carbazole group in fluorophores 63 and 64 act as a donor unit, and the acceptor units are pyrylium and quinolinium salts, respectively. As presented in Scheme 14, the fluorophores were synthesized via Knoevenagel condensation between the carbaldehyde, pyrylium and quinolinium salts.
As shown in Scheme 15, fluorophores 68 and 69 have diphenylamino as a donor unit and carbazole is used as the π linker unit. 2-carbaldehyde-7-bromo carbazole 66 was synthesized from 2,7-dibromo-9-ethyl-9H-carbazole 65 and n-BuLi in THF and DMF. After the formation of carbaldehyde, it was reacted with diphenylamine, Cs2CO3 and Pd (OAc)2 in toluene. Finally, diphenylamino carbazldehyde was reacted with the pyridinium and quinolinium salts under basic conditions to yield fluorophores 68 and 69.
The absorbance maximum of fluorophore 63 was reported as 398 nm in DMSO. Upon the change of acceptor unit from the pyridinium to quinolinium group in fluorophore 64, the absorbance maxima shifted to 448 nm. The fluorophores 68 and 69 with diphenylamine donor group showed a red shift, and the absorbance maxima were reported as 458 nm and 507 nm, respectively. The data showed that stronger donor and acceptor groups enhance ICT and promote red shift. The calculated band gaps using DFT studies were reported as 2.18 eV and 2.04 for fluorophores 63 and 64, and the band gap decreased upon the addition of the diphenylamine group as 1.57 and 1.43 for fluorophores 68 and 69.
Brzeczek et al. reported another example of carbazole containing D-π-A fluorophores which have a star-shaped structure. The synthesis of the star-shaped 1,3,5-tricarbazolebenzenes was performed via Suzuki coupling reactions [50]. The synthesis of the carbazole units of the star-shaped fluorophores is shown in Scheme 16. The first step is the iodination of the carbazole to give monoiodinated and diiodinated carbazoles followed by the addition of octyl bromide to yield compounds 71 and 73. The thienyl group was added to 73 by 2-(tributylstannyl) thiophene, cesium fluoride, copper iodide and Pd (PPh3)4 under argon atmosphere to synthesize 74. Then, compounds 71 and 74 were dissolved in THF, and n-BuLi was added dropwise at −78 °C. Finally, 2-isoproxy-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaboralane was added to yield the desired boronated products 72 and 75 [50].
The star-shaped fluorophores with carbazole moieties were synthesized as outlined in Scheme 17 by two different methods, i and ii. Fluorophores 79ac were synthesized starting from 76 or 77 and 1,3,5-tribromobenzene or 1,3,5-tribromomethoxybenzene by dissolving in THF and water, followed by the addition of potassium carbonate and bis-(triphenylphosphine)palladium (II) dichloride [50]. The absorption maxima of 79ac were reported as 292 nm for 79a, 286 nm for 79b and 309 nm for 79c in DCM. While the methoxy group did not show a significant effect, fluorophore 79c showed a bathochromic shift upon the addition of a thienyl ring, which may be due to the increased conjugation.

2.7. Tetracyanobutadienyl Acceptor Group

As discussed earlier, the cyano group is a good electron acceptor, and a tetracyano acceptor containing dyes is used for photovoltaic applications. The synthesis of a tetracyano acceptor containing donor acceptor fluorophores was reported earlier [51,52,53]. As an example, Michinobu et al. reported the synthesis of D- π -A dyes with different donor groups and a tetracyano acceptor group [54]. The synthesis of fluorophores 83a,b and 86a,b is presented in Scheme 18. The reaction is reported to proceed as a [2 + 2] cycloaddition between the exocyclic double bond of the tetracyano ethylene 80 or tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) and the triple bond of the alkyne 81. Then, the intermediates 82 and 85 are formed and, due to the ring strength of cyclobutene, the reaction yields 83a,b and 86a,b as a concerted mechanism [52]. The absorbance maxima of fluorophores in DCM were reported as 570 nm, 759 nm, 600 nm and 750 nm for 83a, 83b, 86a and 86b, respectively.

2.8. Cyanoacetic Acid Acceptor Group

Cyanoacetic acid is another commonly used acceptor group in D-π-A fluorophores [55,56,57,58]. Quinoxaline was used as an acceptor group in dye 6 (Scheme 2) previously, and due to its conjugated structure, it can also be used as a linker. Yang et al. reported the synthesis of two quinoxaline D- π -A fluorophores with bulky donor groups, and cyanoacetic acid as an acceptor unit, as shown in Scheme 19 [7]. The fluorophores 90a and 90b were synthesized starting with the Suzuki coupling reaction of 5,8-dibromo-2,3-diphenylquinoxaline 87 and (5-formylthiophen-2-yl) boronic acid. The thiophene ring increases conjugation while it also contributes to the acceptor unit. This is followed by the addition of an indoline donor unit via Suzuki coupling reactions to yield compound 89. Finally, a cyanoacetic acid acceptor was added via Knoevenagel condensation to yield the desired products 90a,b. The absorbance spectra of fluorophores showed two peak maxima where the absorption band was between 360 and 420 nm and corresponds to the quinoxaline linker unit. The absorption maxima of dyes 90a and 90b with bulkier donor units were 522 nm and 534 nm in DCM [7].

2.9. 3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) as Linker Unit

3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) is an important strong donor group that is used in small-molecule solar cells [59,60]. It was reported that, due to the strong electron donating ability of EDOT, the HOMO level increases [61]. Demeter et al. reported that fluorophores with an EDOT unit can be used together with the dicyanovinyl acceptor group, and when multiple EDOT units were used, bathochromic shifts were observed [59]. Antwi et al. reported the synthesis of A-D-A-type fluorophores with an EDOT donor unit and three different acceptor units: 1,3-indanedione, 3-ethyl rhodanine and ethyl cyanoacetate [62]. The synthesis and the resulting fluorophore structures are shown in Scheme 20. First, 5,5′-(2,3-dihydrothieno[3,4-b][1,4]dioxine-5,7-diyl) bis(4-hexylthiophene-2-carbaldehyde) 92 was synthesized by activating the alpha positions of EDOT. Then, the fluorophores 9395 were synthesized by Knoevenagel condensation in chloroform under basic conditions. The absorption maxima of fluorophores 9395 were 570 nm, 540 nm and 510 nm in solution, and 592 nm, 550 nm and 513 nm in solid state, respectively. The lowest band gap was reported for 93 with the 1,3-indanedione acceptor group. Since EDOT increases the planarity of the structure, this may result in the aggregation and stacking of the fluorophores in solid form, which is also seen in the decreasing band gap of fluorophores in solid state [62].

3. D-π-A Fluorophores in NIR Region

So far, the synthesis and optical properties of D-π-A fluorophores in the UV-vis region have been discussed. As mentioned before, fluorophores in the NIR region have advantages over those in the UV-vis region, such as a longer wavelength penetrating deeper into the tissue and not overlapping with the emission of biological tissues [63]. Due to these reasons, there is an ongoing interest in the fluorophores in the NIR region, and in this section the synthesis and optical properties of some of the selected D-π-A fluorophores will be discussed.

3.1. 4,5,5-Trimethyl-2,5-dihydrofuran (TCF) Acceptor

4,5,5-Trimethyl-2,5-dihydrofuran (TCF) is a strong acceptor unit used in D-π-A fluorophores [64,65,66]. Remond et al. synthesized fluorophores using 2-dicyanomethylidene-3-cyano-4,5,5-trimethyl-2,5-di-hydrofuran (TCF) as an acceptor and modified at in three positions with extra electron withdrawing phenylthio or phenylsulfonyl moieties [1]. They synthesized compounds 9799 by the Knoevenagel reaction and then combined them with TCF in a microwave to synthesize the final products, as outlined in Scheme 21. The fluorophores showed large Stokes shifts and the emission maxima were shifted to NIR. Fluorophores 9799 had absorption maxima at 570 nm, 509 nm and 580 nm, and fluorescence maxima at 788 nm, 718 nm and 790 nm, respectively, in chloroform. Fluorophores 97 with the phenylthiol group and 99 with the TCF acceptor showed the highest red shift and Stokes shifts of 218 nm and 210 nm. The solvatochromic properties of the fluorophores were further investigated in seven different solvents, namely cyclohexane, toluene, chloroform, dichloromethane, tetrahydrofuran, acetone and dimethylsulfoxide. The solvent polarity versus Stokes shift of the molecules were investigated using the Lippert–Mataga plot, and the large dipole moment changes were reported.

3.2. Pentafluorosulfonyl and Tetracyano Acceptor

As discussed earlier, fluorophores containing a SF5 acceptor moiety (Scheme 1) showed emission in UV-vis. However, with the further functionalization of 1c, two more compounds were synthesized as given in Scheme 22, and their emission was red shifted. Compound 100 was synthesized from 1c and tetracyanoethylene (TCNE). The synthesis of 101 was a slow ring opening reaction of tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) and further purification was necessary since the starting materials were not consumed totally. The absorbances of 100 and 101 were measured in DCM and reported as 485 nm and 667 nm. The red shifted absorbance properties can be explained by the electron withdrawing properties of tetracyano units.
As the combination of SF5 and tetracyano moieties, they make a strong acceptor unit and enhance the ICT of the fluorophore. The increased bathochromic shift of 101 by the addition of a phenyl ring can be explained by the planarization of the fluorophore structure [9].

3.3. Aza-BODIPY Units as Linker and Acceptor Groups

Another class of compounds used for synthesizing D- π -A fluorophores is boron dipyromethene (BODIPY) dyes. The conjugated and photochemically stable core of BODIPY dyes can be used as the scaffold for D-π-A fluorophores, and several donor and acceptor groups can be attached to them [67,68,69]. Also, the BODIPY structure can be used as an acceptor unit due to the electron-withdrawing ability of BF2 group. The general structure and numbering of the BODIPY unit is shown in Figure 8.
There have been a number of studies that have reported the BODIPY unit containing D-π-A fluorophores. As an example, Ulrich et al. reported the synthesis of seven different types of BODIPY dye with the tetracyanobuta-1,3-diene (TCBD) acceptor, and anisole and dibutylamino donor groups [68]. The absorbance of these dyes was in the UV-vis region, between 475 and 602 nm, and they showed emission maxima between 561 and 616 nm in chloroform. The modification of C8 (meso) carbon with nitrogen results in aza-dipyrromethene boron difluoride (aza-BODIPY) dyes which show red shifted optical properties [70]. Jiao et al. reported the synthesis of aza-BODIPY fluorophores with a methoxy donor and different acceptor units that emit in the NIR region [71]. The synthesis of fluorophores 102109 is presented in Scheme 23. The first step is aldol condensation followed by the Michael addition of nitromethane, and finally condensation with nitromethane to yield the desired fluorophores. Fluorophore 109 was synthesized from 108 and methyliodide. The optical properties of dyes were studied in toluene, THF, chloroform, methanol and acetonitrile, and the fluorophores showed absorbance between 685 and 720 nm. The absorbances of fluorophores 107109 were larger than 700 nm, and fluorophore 107 with the cyano acceptor group showed the highest bathochromic shift in toluene λ max = 720 nm. The bathochromic shift increased for fluorophores 107 and 109 with λ em = 744 nm and 756 nm in THF. This increase shows the effect of adding CF3 and CN acceptor groups, promoting the ICT and polarization of the molecule. The fluorophore 109 showed emission at 743 nm in methanol, at 744 nm in acetonitrile and 752 nm in chloroform [71].
In another study, Bai et al. reported aza-BODIPY fluorophores in the NIR-II region that were modified with four donor units at 1, 3, 5 and 7 positions [72]. Since the aza-BODIPY structure is a good electron-withdrawing group, it was used as the acceptor moiety in these D-π-A fluorophores and the donor units were 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl 111, 1-ethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolinyl 112 and 4-julolidinyl 113. The fluorophores were synthesized according to the similar procedure reported by Jiao et al., and the synthesis is shown in Scheme 24. The absorbance maxima of fluorophores were reported as 651 nm and 799 nm for 111, 668 nm and 830 nm for 112, and 672 nm and 912 nm for 113. The emission maxima of fluorophores 111113 were reported as 960 nm, 1030 nm and 1060 nm, respectively, in PBS. The emission maxima were further red shifted in DMSO as 989 nm, 1036 nm and 1070 nm, respectively. The Stokes shifts of these fluorophores were also large, between 120 and 187 nm, and the quantum yields were reported as 0.16%, 0.2% and 1.0% in aqueous solutions.

3.4. Phenothiazine Donor

The phenothiazine molecule is used as a donor unit for D- π -A fluorophores due to the electron-donating ability of the sulfur atom, creating a stable cation upon ionization [73,74]. One of the phenothiazine containing dyes, methylene blue (MB), is an FDA-approved drug that is used for bioimaging [75,76]. Due to its conjugated structure, the phenothiazine donor containing D-π-A fluorophores have attracted attention [77,78]. Chaudhary et al. reported the synthesis of fluorophores with alkyl groups introduced at N-10 phenothiazine donor and several acceptor groups at carbons 3,7 positions, such as cyano, fluorine, acetyl and thiazole [79].
As another example, Hsieh et al. reported the synthesis of two phenothiazine donor containing fluorophores with aniline donor and nitrobenzene acceptor units [80]. The synthesis of nitrobenzene phenothiazine fluorophore is given in Scheme 25. In the first step, 4-iodo nitrobenzene (114) was reacted with bis(pinacolato)diboron and a Pd (PPh)3Cl2 catalyst under a nitrogen atmosphere to yield boronated nitrobenzene 115. Phenothiazine was brominated by the dropwise addition of NBS in THF to yield 3,7-dibromo phenothiazine 117. Finally, 115 and 117 were reacted via the Suzuki coupling reaction at 105 °C for 2 days to form 3,7-Bis(4-nitrophenyl) phenothiazine 120. The aniline phenothiazine 119 was synthesized starting from 4-bromoaniline, pinacolborane and a Pd (PPh)3Cl2 catalyst. Then, similarly, 119 was reacted with 3,7-dibromo phenothiazine (117) and a Pd catalyst to yield 3,7-Bis(4-aminophenyl) phenothiazine 121. Fluorophores 120 and 121 showed emissions in the UV region in DMSO. Additionally, their emissions were also measured in DMSO with NaOH, KOH and tBuOK, which resulted in the deprotonation of the nitrogen at position 10 (N-10). When the dyes were deprotonated in DMSO under basic conditions, significant bathochromic shifts were seen. The λ max of fluorophore 120 shifted from 465 nm to 825 nm, and the negative charge on phenothiazine was stabilized by the nitrobenzene groups. Fluorophore 121 has two peaks, 350 nm and 535 nm, which shifted to 535 nm and 740 nm upon the deprotonation of N-10 [80].
Gong et al. reported the synthesis of fluorophores with the phenothiazine donor and different acceptor groups emitting in the NIR region [81]. The butterfly shape of phenothiazine promotes the solid state emission of fluorophores due to steric hindrance. The synthesis of fluorophores with a phenothiazine donor and different acceptor groups 124127 is given in Scheme 26. First, the alkylation of N-10 was conducted, and then 122 was reacted with phosphorous oxychloride to yield aldehyde compound 123. In the last step, compound 123 was reacted with the four different acceptor groups in methanol under basic conditions to form fluorophores 124127. Fluorophores 124127 showed absorption between 392 and 495 nm in DCM. The solid state of dyes showed emissions in the NIR region between 551 and 727 nm. The dyes 126 and 127 specifically showed bathochromic shifts due to their strong acceptor groups, their λ max were 717 nm and 727 nm, and quantum yields were 2% and 5%, respectively. The dyes 124 and 125 had the highest quantum yields of 23% and 38%, respectively, however their emissions were the most hypochromic shifted ones [81].

3.5. Chloroacrylic Acid Acceptor

As discussed in the previous examples, the cyanoacetic acid and carboxylic acid groups are commonly used acceptor groups in D-π-A fluorophores. In addition to these groups, chloroacrylic acid can be used as an acceptor group since it contains carboxylic acid and chloride. Our group reported the synthesis of D-π-A fluorophores with a chloroacrylic acid acceptor unit and several different donor units as indole, benzothiazole, benzo[e]indole, 2-quinoline and 4-quinoline [15]. The acceptor and donor units in these fluorophores are connected with a bisaldehyde 129 which is synthesized via Vilsmeier Haack formylation and referred to as a Vilsmeier linker. The hepta cyanine dyes containing the Vilsmeier linker between two heterocyclic units have absorbance maxima in the NIR region [82,83]. This similar scaffold was modified to synthesize D-π-A fluorophores in the NIR region, as shown in Scheme 27. The fluorophores 131137 showed absorption maxima in the NIR region of 790 nm, 800 nm, 815 nm, 860 nm and 970 nm, respectively. The highest quantum yield was reported for fluorophore 132 with a benzothiazole donor unit of 19%. 2-quinoline and 4-quinoline containing fluorophores 136 and 137 were significantly red shifted, which was attributed to the planarity and enhanced conjugation of the fluorophores. Emission maxima of the fluorophores 131134 were reported as 810 nm, 812 nm, 824 nm and 870 nm, respectively. The emission maxima of fluorophore 135 was out of the range of the instrument. According to the TD-DFT studies, the chlorine atom at the meso position of the linker unit also contributes to the acceptor unit due to its electron-withdrawing ability. This property forms a stronger acceptor unit.

4. Optical Properties of Selected Compounds

4.1. Two Photon Absorption

In one photon absorption process, when a molecule absorbs a photon, the electrons at the ground state go into an excited state and relax back by emitting light. In the case of two-photon absorption (2PA), the molecule absorbs two photons instead of one. In this process, instead of using a high-energy photon, two lower energy photons can be used for exciting the molecule while creating an intermediate state [84]. 2PA was first introduced by M. Goppert-Mayer in 1931, who proposed that an intermediate state forms upon the absorption of a photon, and this is followed by the absorption of a second photon and moving to a higher state. This process is shown in Figure 9 by an electronic state diagram. However, due to the lack of a coherent light source, this theory could not be tested until the laser was invented in 1961 [85].
Multiphoton excitation (MPE) is a process where the compound absorbs more than two photons, however, this process is much more complicated than 2PA since the absorption of several photons may ionize the molecule, change the refractive index of the medium, and have several other effects [85]. Note that the size of the molecule should be greater than the 2PA cross-section area ( δ 2PA), which is the result of the diffraction limit such that 2PA becomes possible [8]. Fluorophores 2129 were designed as two-photon-absorbing molecules due to their large surface areas, and their 2PA properties were measured in DCM with 1-3 mM solutions that have an absorption between 740 and 800 nm, which is approximately twice that of the one-photon absorption studies. The 2PA cross-section areas of fluorophores 2125 were between 158 and 427 GM. The fluorophores with thiophene 22 and 24 showed two peaks different from the others; one of the peaks was at 940 nm [32]. Among the fluorophores 2629, compound 28 with cross section dicyano group showed the highest 2PA cross-section. The 2PA studies of fluorophore 29 were performed in THF with 10−4 M solutions. The dicyanovinyl acceptor containing dye 27 had a 2PA cross-section area of 667 GM [34]. Another example reported by Huang et al. is dicyanostilbene derivatives containing a carbazole donor unit that is used as a two-photon fluorescence temperature probe [86].

4.2. Aggregation-Induced Emission

Most of the luminescent molecules tend to aggregate with increased concentration in solution, resulting in decreasing fluorescence, which is defined as aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ). An example of this is fluorescein which is soluble in water but insoluble in most organic solvents. In a water–acetone mixture, as the volume of acetone is increased, the emission of fluorescein decreases as an example of quenching fluorescence by aggregation. On the other hand, aggregation-induced emission (AIE) is when the luminescent molecules come together as aggregates and emit light. In AIE, the fluorophores are not emissive when they are dissolved in solution, but they become emissive when the concentration increases, and they become aggregates. Most of the fluorophores that are emissive in solution have a mostly planar structure and they are quenched by aggregation, while AIE fluorophores are non-planar and have twisted structures [87]. AIE fluorophores are used in both photovoltaic applications and in bioimaging studies. Fluorophores with AIE properties can be designed strategically to accumulate at targeted organelles. One of the examples by Zhuang et al. reported a strategical design of fluorophores with a cationic pyridinium unit to target mitochondria for reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation [88]. Based on the positional isomerism strategy employed by the researchers, it was reported that cross section cyano group on the fluorophores with AIE induces the ROS generation. In another study, Li et al. reported that the coumarin-based fluorophores with AIE properties for H2S sensing [89] were not limited to the AIE, but we discuss more applications in the following section.

5. Applications

D- π -A fluorophores find applications in several areas such as organic solar cells and light-emitting diodes, bioimaging, biosensors and anti-cancer activity. These topics will be discussed briefly in this section.

5.1. Organic Solar Cells

Solar cells are clean energy sources that convert light energy to electricity. Organic solar cells have several advantages over inorganic silicon-based solar cells such as low cost, flexibility and non-toxicity [90]. Although the polymer- and fullerene-based solar cells are the most studied ones, during the last few years there has been an ongoing interest in small molecule-based organic photovoltaics [91]. The most challenging part of photovoltaic studies is obtaining a high-power conversion efficiency (PCE) which depends on the open circuit voltage (Voc), circuit current density (Jsc) and fill factor (FF). The working mechanism of the solar cells has been investigated in detail over the years. The donor unit absorbs light and an exciton is generated which is followed by its diffusion and dissociation, and collection by the acceptor [92]. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) are non-toxic sources that produce clean energy [93]. The structure consists of a working electrode, counter electrode and an electrolyte. The working electrode is usually the conducting indium tin oxide (ITO) that has a coating of a semiconductor material such as TiO2, ZnO or SnO2. The organic dye is coated on the semiconducting material and absorbs the incoming light. The organic dyes can be coated on the semiconductor via different mechanisms such as covalent bonding, hydrogen bonding, van der Waals forces, electrostatic attraction and adsorption [93,94]. The interaction of dyes with the metal surface is via their anchoring groups, and the orientation of the dyes on the semiconductor surface affects the efficiency [95]. Some of the anchoring groups used in the literature are pyridyl, carboxylic acid, phosphonic acid, tetracyanate and perylene groups [93]. D-π-A fluorophores are preferred in DSSCs since they have efficient intramolecular charge transfer properties [57]. The fluorophores 83a,b and 86a,b reported by Michinobu et al. with a tetracyano acceptor group were used for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC). The TiO2 powder was reported to show color change when immersed in the dye solutions, therefore, the fluorophores show a surface adsorption. The device sensitized using a triphenylamine group (86a) showed a higher current density (0.65 mA cm−2) than that of 83a (0.12 mA cm−2). In the case of dyes with a tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) acceptor unit, 86b showed a current density of 1.71 mA cm−1, while 83b showed a current density of 1.41 mA cm−2. TCNQ containing fluorophores showed better open circuit voltage than tetracyano ethylene (TCNE) containing fluorophores, and the best photon conversion efficiency was reported for fluorophore 86b. The power conversion efficiencies of devices with fluorophores 83a and 83b was as low as 0.58% and 6.3%. On the other hand, the power conversion efficiencies of fluorophores 86a and 86b were 20% and 25%.
Fluorophores 90a and 90b (Scheme 19), which have a quinoxaline linker and indoline acceptors, were discussed in the synthesis part. The photovoltaic properties of solar cells with dyes were studied on a double layer TiO2 film as the anode and Pt as the counter-electrode (CE). The absorption maxima of dyes on the TiO2 film were reported as 502 nm and 508 nm, respectively. For the iodide-based electrode, the Voc values were similar, while the power conversion efficiency of 90b was higher than 90a. In the case of a cobalt-based electrode, the Voc and power conversion efficiencies were higher for 90b with a bulkier donor unit.
The photovoltaic performances of the A-D-A-type three fluorophores 9395 were investigated using bulk heterojunction cells where PEDOT: PSS was used as a hole transport layer and [6,6]-phenylC71 butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM) were used as an acceptor. The devices had bulk heterojunction architecture with ITO and calcium electrodes. While 93 had low solubility, the other two fluorophores showed better solubilities. The PCE of the fluorophores were found to be between 0.63 and 1.36%, with 95 being the highest [62].

5.2. Bioimaging

Previously discussed fluorophores 63 and 64 with carbazole donor and pyrylium and quinolinium acceptors, and fluorophores 68 and 69 with diphenylamine donor and pyrylium and quinolinium acceptors, were reported to show AIE properties. The optical properties of fluorophores were studied in DMSO/toluene mixtures, and, upon the increase in toluene fractions, the dyes aggregated and the fluorescence intensity got higher. One of the examples of using AIE fluorophores for bioimaging is using them as mitochondria-targeting agents. Mitochondria, which are the power cells of the human body, are negatively charged in the inner membrane which is close to matrix [87]. Therefore, positively charged and lipophilic fluorophores are used as targeting agents [96,97]. Fluorophores 63, 64, 68 and 69 with positively charged acceptor groups showed specificity to mitochondria and the images of HeLa cells stained with four different fluorophores are presented in Figure 10.
The AIE properties of previously discussed fluorophores 120 and 121 were studied by Hsieh et al. in THF/water solvent with different ratios. The dye 121 showed AIE upon acidic conditions due to the protonation of nitrogen. The phototoxicity experiments were conducted with HeLa cells and the singlet oxygen acceptor diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF). While dye 120 did not show any phototoxicity effect, dye 87 was effective. However, since the absorbance of 121 was in the UV region, the indicators DPBF and TEMPO, which are photoresponsive agents, may also be excited [80].
Fluorophores in NIR-I and NIR-II regions are preferred for bioimaging studies since there is less autofluorescence from biomolecules in these regions and penetration depth is higher [5]. The NIR-II window between 1000 and 1700 nm is reported to have improved imaging quality over the NIR-I window [98]. So far, several D-π-A fluorophores have been synthesized in the NIR region with different scaffolds [99,100]. Aza-BODIPY fluorophores 111113 in the NIR-II region that were reported by Bai et al. were discussed previously [72]. The fluorophores contain three different donor units, namely 4-(N,N-dimethylamino) phenyl 111, 1-ethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolinyl 112 and 4-julolidinyl 113. Fluorophore 113 was selected for bioimaging studies, as presented in Figure 11, since it has the highest red shift. However, it showed low water solubility, therefore, the fluorophore was prepared as a nanoparticle (NP) by encapsulation into the Pluronic F-127 matrix. The NPs showed absorption maxima at 858 nm and emission maxima at 1062 nm. The imaging depth was reported as 8 mm. The imaging studies were performed according to FDA-approved indocyanine green (ICG) dye and IR-1061 dye. It was reported that fluorophore 113 NPs showed high imaging ability. After injection over 6–8 h, the tumor signal was increased. The ex vivo biodistribution studies showed that the dye accumulates in the liver and spleen, in addition to in the tumor tissue.
Compounds with a quinolinium acceptor unit were reported by Zheng et al. as a probe to detect viscosity in cirrhotic liver tissue [101]. Due to the flexible polymethine chain in between, the dimethyl phenyl group can rotate, which is known as a twisted intramolecular charge transfer, and the molecule loses some of its absorbed energy by this rotation in low-viscosity solvents.
Cesaretti et al. reported the same scaffold as RNA selective donor acceptor styryl dyes with positively charged quinolinium and pyridinium acceptor units 138 and 139 [102]. They performed spectrophotometric and fluorimetric titrations with calf thymus DNA and tRNA to study the interaction between the dye and nucleic acids in ETN (1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM NaCl) buffer solution. While the absorbance intensity of dye containing a pyridinium acceptor decreases, a quinolinium acceptor unit containing dye showed an increase. The in vitro studies of two dyes were performed with A549 cells using fluorescence microscopy with a 10 uM concentration. The dyes were specifically found at the perinuclear portion of the cytoplasm, and punctuated structures within the nuclei were lit up, as shown in Figure 12.

5.3. Organic Light Emitting Diodes

Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) are LEDs with organic compounds emitting light upon electric current [103]. The devices consist of an anode which is commonly ITO, a cathode and an organic layer of molecules placed between those layers. OLEDs have found applications in several areas such as lightning, OLED TVs, cell phones and digital cameras [104]. One of the advantages of using organic molecules for LED devices is that inorganic compounds themselves or their purification process may be harmful to the environment [105]. OLEDs have advantages that they are non-toxic, and they do not face the problem of containing metals that may become extinct. The pioneering work on OLEDs was reported by Tang et al., in which the electroluminescent behavior of double layer diamine, Alq3, was investigated using a Mg:Ag alloy cathode [106]. Although polymers were mainly used as electroluminescent organics, small organic molecules have also attracted attention over the last few years due to their low cost, low turn-on voltage and ease of modification of the structure. The dyes that show AIE properties due to the restriction of the intramolecular rotation of bonds find application in OLEDs [107,108].
Carbazoles are one of the organic compounds used for OLEDs starting with their usage as polymers [109,110]. Previously discussed star-shaped fluorophores 79ac with carbazole units have been used in OLED applications. The monomers undergo irreversible oxidation and, while 79a and 79b showed similar characteristics on the CV, 79c shifted to lower potential. Optical spectra of the polymers were investigated for the p doping process. All polymers were reported as neutral at a potential of ca. −4.0 V, showing an absorption peak for 79a due to π - π * transition. Optical band gaps of the polymers prepared from D- π -A fluorophores were reported as 3.05 eV, 3.12 eV and 2.55 eV for 79ac. The lower band gap of 79c is due to the thienyl group promoting a higher conjugation.

5.4. Anticancer Activity

Fluorophores 131134 with a chloroacrylic acid acceptor and different donor units, as presented in Figure 13, were studied for their cytotoxicity against breast cancer cell lines HCC-1806, HCC-70 and BT-20, using an MTT assay. The cytotoxicity of the fluorophores was compared with the known anticancer drug docetaxel and the fluorophores showed higher activity than docetaxel. Especially for fluorophore 132 with a 5-bromoindole donor unit, the IC50 value was reported as 0.717 μ M, and 0.940 μ M and 1.470 μ M for HCC-1806, HCC-70 and BT-20 cells, respectively, whereas docetaxel had IC50 values of 50.9, 35.6 and 2.41 μ M. In another study reported by Bai et al., the aza-BODIPY fluorophores were studied. The fluorophores contain three different donor groups, namely 4-(N,N-dimethylamino) phenyl 111, 1-ethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolinyl 112 and 4-julolidinyl 113, as discussed before. Fluorophore 113 was selected for in vivo imaging due to its emission in the NIR-II region, and NPs were prepared in a Pluronic F-127 matrix. The fluorophore did not show any cytotoxicity compared to standard XTT analysis.

5.5. Biosensors

In addition to the applications discussed before, another application of D- π -A fluorophores is their usage as metal and toxic ion sensors. Among the heavy metals, some of them show serious effects on the human body in the case of high exposure, such as Cu+2, Hg+2 and Pb+2. Cu+2 is an essential divalent in the human body since it takes roles in the metabolic pathway, however, in the case of high concentration it is toxic and can cause diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease [111]. Nguyen et al. reported Cu+2-detecting donor acceptor-type fluorophores with a picoline moiety and dicyanometylenedihydrofuran (DCDHF) acceptor [111]. While the absorbance of this dye is 400 nm without Cu+2, upon addition of Cu+2 the absorbance red shifts to 590 nm. Another D-π-A fluorophore reported for Cu+2 detection containing coumarin and benzothiazole showed a detection limit between 4.0 and 5.7 ppb [112]. In addition to the heavy metals, cyanide is another toxic molecule for the human body due to its high electron-withdrawing effect, and it can bind to essential metals and cause disorders [113]. Therefore, there is an ongoing interest in cyanide detection in water and in vivo using small organic D-π-A molecule probes [114,115,116,117].
Another example is hypochlorite ions that are used for bleaching and disinfecting processes which are harmful for human health, causing cancer, arthritis and tissue damage [75]. Huang et al. reported the usage of an acetylated methylene blue probe for the detection of hypochlorite ions in water [75]. The studies showed that, upon the addition of a hypochlorite ion to the carbonyl carbon, the amide bond of the probe is cleaved, releasing the methylene blue and resulting in a color change of the solution.
In another study, Arachchige et al. reported quinoline acceptor containing fluorophores as candidates for investigating NADH dynamics and redox process [27]. As the NADH concentration is increased, the florescence intensity of the probes increases. While NADH becomes oxidized, the 3-quinolinium unit is reduced to a 1,4-dihydroquinoline unit. Upon reduction of the quinolinium unit, the extended conjugation is regained, resulting in higher fluorescence signals as presented in Figure 14.
Last but not least, donor acceptor fluorophores also find an application as ratiometric probes for biosensing [118]. Ratiometric fluorophores have two or more peaks with changing intensities due to a change in environmental factors such as pH or various analytes [119]. As an example, Munan et al. reported the synthesis of fluorophores called IndiFluors which consists of a conjugated rigid D-A-D system modified with a mitochondria-targeting triphenylphosphine moiety for ratiometric pH imaging during mitophagy [120]. In addition to pH change, an example of analyte response has been reported by Yuan et al., who designed a lysosome-targeting probe containing a morpholine moiety to detect leucine aminopeptidase activity [121]. The emission at 520 nm decreases while a new peak at 580 nm increases upon treatment with leucine aminopeptidase. Table 1 presented below, highlights absorbance, emission and quantum yield of selected fluorophores discussed above in this paper.
Table 1. Optical properties of selected fluorophores. * Fluorophores with more than one absorbance wavelength maxima.
Table 1. Optical properties of selected fluorophores. * Fluorophores with more than one absorbance wavelength maxima.
Compound NumberSolvent λ abs (nm) λ em (nm) QY   ( Φ )
1aToluene3494180.48
DCM3474490.016
Acetone3444610.010
1bToluene3854480.24
DCM3864880.20
Acetone3815000.070
1cToluene3694240.48
DCM3684600.070
Acetone3634880.010
1dToluene3794340.49
DCM3804920.40
Acetone3735150.15
1eToluene4074720.29
DCM4035280.23
Acetone3975470.19
1fToluene3964540.37
DCM3955060.30
Acetone3875310.17
5aDCM3474200.51
5cDCM3126120.54
5d *DCM314, 3945900.41
6a *DCM308, 3814470.39
6c *DCM321, 4066470.07
6d *DCM306, 333, 4036300.37
7a *DCM278, 383462<0.01
7c *DCM328, 4196070.80
7d *DCM305, 342, 4165830.79
9aCHCl34364910.002
9bCHCl34555310.006
9dCHCl35346520.61
10aCHCl34955480.003
10bCHCl35145790.006
10dCHCl35957100.20
14aDMF413--
14bDMF444--
16aDMF433--
16bDMF446--
18aDMF459--
18bDMF479--
21 *DMF332, 4015770.55
22DMF3635870.58
23DMF3456300.37
24DMF3706170.38
25DMF3395510.67
26DMF3724480.64
27DMF4535490.29
28DMF4205330.69
29DMF4125160.49
37aDMF4025360.22
37bDMF4155440.56
40cEtOH3966220.06
DMSO4025820.85
CHCl33995320.72
Dioxane3914880.52
Toluene3944730.86
40dEtOH4766800.12
DMSO4887100.19
CHCl34866080.45
Dioxane4675830.30
Toluene4745660.26
40gEtOH3705630.71
DMSO3735210.72
CHCl33814920.54
Dioxane3644560.73
Toluene3744500.60
63DMSO398-0.014
64DMSO448-0.004
68DMSO458-0.09
69DMSO507-0.03
83aDCM570--
83bDCM600--
86aDCM759--
86bDCM750--
97CHCl3570788-
98CHCl3509718-
99CHCl3580790-
100DCM485--
101DCM667--
106Toluene7097400.38
CHCl37047410.34
THF7097440.28
MeOH7007390.21
107Toluene7207540.36
CHCl37167550.29
THF7187560.22
MeOH7107500.16
109TolueneNot solubleNot soluble-
CHCl37127520.14
THF7147500.16
MeOH7067430.14
111 *PBS (20% DMSO)651, 7999600.0016
112 *PBS (20% DMSO)668, 83010300.002
113 *PBS (20% DMSO)672, 91010600.01
131EtOH7807980.1
132EtOH7848040.08
133EtOH8108250.08
134EtOH8008120.13
135EtOH8158240.16
136EtOH8608700.17
137EtOH970--
138DCM5577050.25
EtOH5027090.049
MeOH4927120.027
139DCM5916790.053
EtOH5486780.016
MeOH5426860.006

6. Conclusions

In this review, the synthesis, properties and applications of D- π -A fluorophores with various donor and acceptor units were discussed. The main objective was to give examples of the synthesis and optical properties of D- π -A fluorophores since 2014, and to understand the effect of the donor and acceptor groups on the ICT. It was mentioned earlier that donor and acceptor groups, and the π linker, have significant effects on ICT and the geometry of the molecule. Although it was reported that the planarization enhances ICT and promotes the red shift, there are some examples where the rotation of one of the units promotes ICT, showing the importance of the relation between the donor and acceptor units through ICT. The most used donor groups were diphenylamine, dimethylamine and alkoxy, while the acceptor groups of dicyano vinyl, nitro and pyridine were used. The careful modification of donor and acceptors groups makes these fluorophores useful in several areas such as solar cells, OLEDs, two-photon absorption, aggregation-induced emission, cytotoxicity studies, in vivo imaging and biosensors. In conclusion, the D- π -A fluorophores with highly conjugated structures and strong donor and acceptor groups are promising molecules in the bioanalytical and biomedical fields.

Author Contributions

G.E.: literature survey, writing—original draft, editing. M.H.: supervision, editing and revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We would like to acknowledge the funding from NIH R01CA280968, R01EB034731, R01CA281098.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Molecular Basis of Disease fellowship for supporting GE’s PhD dissertation.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rémond, M.; Zheng, Z.; Jeanneau, E.; Andraud, C.; Bretonnière, Y.; Redon, S. 4,5,5-Trimethyl-2,5-dihydrofuran-Based Electron-Withdrawing Groups for NIR-Emitting Push–Pull Dipolar Fluorophores. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 9965–9974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Geraghty, C.; Wynne, C.; Elmes, R.B.P. 1,8-Naphthalimide based fluorescent sensors for enzymes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 437, 213713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Han, Q.; Wang, N.; Wang, M.; Wang, J. Donor-acceptor based enhanced electrochemiluminescence of coumarin microcrystals: Mechanism study and sensing application. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 393, 134296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, C.; Fang, C. Devising Efficient Red-Shifting Strategies for Bioimaging: A Generalizable Donor-Acceptor Fluorophore Prototype. Chem.—Asian J. 2020, 15, 1514–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Owens, E.A.; Henary, M.; El Fakhri, G.; Choi, H.S. Tissue-Specific Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 1731–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bureš, F. Fundamental aspects of property tuning in push–pull molecules. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 58826–58851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, J.; Ganesan, P.; Teuscher, J.; Moehl, T.; Kim, Y.J.; Yi, C.; Comte, P.; Pei, K.; Holcombe, T.W.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; et al. Influence of the Donor Size in D–π–A Organic Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5722–5730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, L.; Wong, M.S. Multiphoton Excited Fluorescent Materials for Frequency Upconversion Emission and Fluorescent Probes. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 5400–5428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gautam, P.; Yu, C.P.; Zhang, G.; Hillier, V.E.; Chan, J.M.W. Pulling with the Pentafluorosulfanyl Acceptor in Push–Pull Dyes. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 11008–11020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stewart, D.J.; Dalton, M.J.; Swiger, R.N.; Fore, J.L.; Walker, M.A.; Cooper, T.M.; Haley, J.E.; Tan, L.-S. Symmetry- and Solvent-Dependent Photophysics of Fluorenes Containing Donor and Acceptor Groups. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 5228–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Marini, A.; Muñoz-Losa, A.; Biancardi, A.; Mennucci, B. What is Solvatochromism? J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 17128–17135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Popczyk, A.; Cheret, Y.; El-Ghayoury, A.; Sahraoui, B.; Mysliwiec, J. Solvatochromic fluorophores based on thiophene derivatives for highly-precise water, alcohols and dangerous ions detection. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 177, 108300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nigam, S.; Rutan, S. Principles and Applications of Solvatochromism. Appl. Spectrosc. 2001, 55, 362A–370A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, S.; He, M.; Jin, X.; Geng, W.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Qian, J.; Hua, J. Extending the Stokes Shifts of Donor–Acceptor Fluorophores by Regulating the Donor Configuration for In Vivo Three-Photon Fluorescence Imaging. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 5999–6008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Essam, Z.; Ozmen, G.E.; Setiawan, D.; Hamid, R.R.; Abd El-aal, R.; Aneja, R.; Hamelberg, D.; Henary, M. Donor Acceptor Fluorophores: Synthesis, Optical Properties, TD-DFT and Cytotoxicity Studies. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 1835–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sumida, A.; Takahashi, S.; Nagai, S.; Ito, S. Fused Heteroaromatic Donor–Acceptor Fluorophores: Enhanced Brightness and Variable Emission Characteristics. Chem. Lett. 2024, 53, upae047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sheppard, W.A. Arylsulfur Pentafluorides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 3064–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sheppard, W.A. The Electrical Effect of the Sulfur Pentafluoride Group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 3072–3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rogers, H.M.; Arachchige, S.M.; Brewer, K.J.; Swavey, S. Polyatomic Bridging Ligands. In Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Achelle, S.; Hodée, M.; Massue, J.; Fihey, A.; Katan, C. Diazine-based thermally activated delayed fluorescence chromophores. Dye. Pigment. 2022, 200, 110157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Denneval, C.; Moldovan, O.; Baudequin, C.; Achelle, S.; Baldeck, P.; Plé, N.; Darabantu, M.; Ramondenc, Y. Synthesis and Photophysical Properties of Push–Pull Structures Incorporating Diazines as Attracting Part with a Fluorene Core. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 2013, 5591–5602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Achelle, S.; Barsella, A.; Caro, B.; Robin-le Guen, F. Donor–linker–acceptor (D–π–A) diazine chromophores with extended π-conjugated cores: Synthesis, photophysical and second order nonlinear optical properties. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 39218–39227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vanden Eynde, J.J.; Pascal, L.; Van Haverbeke, Y.; Dubois, P. Quaternary Ammonium Salt-Assisted Synthesis of Extended π-Systems from Methyldiazines and Aromatic Aldehydes1. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 3167–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yan, Y.; Zhu, X.; Cao, J.-X.; He, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, J.-Y. Donor-acceptor type π-conjugated 1, 3, 5-triazine dyes synthesis and its application in cell imaging and liquid food safety detection. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 221, 111798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Peng, H.; Zheng, Y.; Antheaume, C.; Samorì, P.; Ciesielski, A. Novel thiophene-based donor–acceptor scaffolds as cathodes for rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion hybrid supercapacitors. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 6689–6692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Balakirev, D.O.; Solodukhin, A.N.; Peregudova, S.M.; Svidchenko, E.A.; Surin, N.M.; Fedorov, Y.V.; Ponomarenko, S.A.; Luponosov, Y.N. Luminescent push-pull triphenylamine-based molecules end-capped with various electron-withdrawing groups: Synthesis and properties. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 208, 110777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arachchige, D.L.; Dwivedi, S.K.; Waters, M.; Jaeger, S.; Peters, J.; Tucker, D.R.; Geborkoff, M.; Werner, T.; Luck, R.L.; Godugu, B. Sensitive monitoring of NAD (P) H levels within cancer cells using mitochondria-targeted near-infrared cyanine dyes with optimized electron-withdrawing acceptors. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12, 448–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Manuela, M.; Raposo, M.; Herbivo, C.; Hugues, V.; Clermont, G.; Castro, M.C.R.; Comel, A.; Blanchard-Desce, M. Synthesis, Fluorescence, and Two-Photon Absorption Properties of Push–Pull 5-Arylthieno[3,2-b]thiophene Derivatives. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 2016, 5263–5273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cinar, M.E.; Ozturk, T. Thienothiophenes, Dithienothiophenes, and Thienoacenes: Syntheses, Oligomers, Polymers, and Properties. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3036–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Podlesný, J.; Pytela, O.; Klikar, M.; Jelínková, V.; Kityk, I.V.; Ozga, K.; Jedryka, J.; Rudysh, M.; Bureš, F. Small isomeric push–pull chromophores based on thienothiophenes with tunable optical (non)linearities. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 3623–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Podlesný, J.; Jelínková, V.; Pytela, O.; Klikar, M.; Bureš, F. Acceptor-induced photoisomerization in small thienothiophene push-pull chromophores. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 179, 108398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cvejn, D.; Achelle, S.; Pytela, O.; Malval, J.-P.; Spangenberg, A.; Cabon, N.; Bureš, F.; Robin-le Guen, F. Tripodal molecules with triphenylamine core, diazine peripheral groups and extended π-conjugated linkers. Dye. Pigment. 2016, 124, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cvejn, D.; Michail, E.; Seintis, K.; Klikar, M.; Pytela, O.; Mikysek, T.; Almonasy, N.; Ludwig, M.; Giannetas, V.; Fakis, M.; et al. Solvent and branching effect on the two-photon absorption properties of push–pull triphenylamine derivatives. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 12819–12828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cvejn, D.; Michail, E.; Polyzos, I.; Almonasy, N.; Pytela, O.; Klikar, M.; Mikysek, T.; Giannetas, V.; Fakis, M.; Bureš, F. Modulation of (non)linear optical properties in tripodal molecules by variation of the peripheral cyano acceptor moieties and the π-spacer. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 7345–7355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Martin, F.-A.; Baudequin, C.; Fiol-Petit, C.; Darabantu, M.; Ramondenc, Y.; Plé, N. Synthesis and optical properties of multibranched and C3 symmetrical oligomers with benzene or triphenylamine core and diazines as peripheral groups. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 2546–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kournoutas, F.; Fihey, A.; Malval, J.-P.; Spangenberg, A.; Fecková, M.; le Poul, P.; Katan, C.; Robin-le Guen, F.; Bureš, F.; Achelle, S.; et al. Branching effect on the linear and nonlinear optical properties of styrylpyrimidines. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 4165–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Achelle, S.; Barsella, A.; Baudequin, C.; Caro, B.; Robin-le Guen, F. Synthesis and Photophysical Investigation of a Series of Push–Pull Arylvinyldiazine Chromophores. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 4087–4096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Achelle, S.; Nouira, I.; Pfaffinger, B.; Ramondenc, Y.; Plé, N.; Rodríguez-López, J. V-Shaped 4,6-Bis(arylvinyl)pyrimidine Oligomers: Synthesis and Optical Properties. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3711–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Fecková, M.; le Poul, P.; Guen, F.R.-l.; Roisnel, T.; Pytela, O.; Klikar, M.; Bureš, F.; Achelle, S. 2,4-Distyryl- and 2,4,6-Tristyrylpyrimidines: Synthesis and Photophysical Properties. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 11712–11726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shaya, J.; Fontaine-Vive, F.; Michel, B.Y.; Burger, A. Rational Design of Push–Pull Fluorene Dyes: Synthesis and Structure–Photophysics Relationship. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 10627–10637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kannan, R.; He, G.S.; Yuan, L.; Xu, F.; Prasad, P.N.; Dombroskie, A.G.; Reinhardt, B.A.; Baur, J.W.; Vaia, R.A.; Tan, L.-S. Diphenylaminofluorene-Based Two-Photon-Absorbing Chromophores with Various π-Electron Acceptors. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 1896–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Belfield, K.D.; Morales, A.R.; Kang, B.-S.; Hales, J.M.; Hagan, D.J.; Van Stryland, E.W.; Chapela, V.M.; Percino, J. Synthesis, Characterization, and Optical Properties of New Two-Photon-Absorbing Fluorene Derivatives. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4634–4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stewart, D.J.; Dalton, M.J.; Swiger, R.N.; Cooper, T.M.; Haley, J.E.; Tan, L.-S. Exciplex Formation in Blended Spin-Cast Films of Fluorene-Linked Dyes and Bisphthalimide Quenchers. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 3909–3917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Joseph, V.; Thomas, K.R.J.; Singh, M.; Sahoo, S.; Jou, J.-H. Manipulation of Donor–Acceptor Interactions in Carbazole-Based Emitters by Chromophore Choice To Achieve Near-UV Emission. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 2017, 6660–6670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Raikwar, M.M.; Mohbiya, D.R.; Sekar, N. N-Ethyl Carbazole Derived D-π-A-π-D Based Fluorophores: Consolidated Spectroscopic, Viscosity and DFT Studies. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 11966–11978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tang, R.-R.; Zhang, W. Facile Procedure for the Synthesis of 3-Acetyl-9-ethylcarbazole and Corresponding Functionalized Bis-β-diketone Compounds. Synth. Commun. 2010, 40, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Z.-S.; Koumura, N.; Cui, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Sekiguchi, H.; Mori, A.; Kubo, T.; Furube, A.; Hara, K. Hexylthiophene-Functionalized Carbazole Dyes for Efficient Molecular Photovoltaics: Tuning of Solar-Cell Performance by Structural Modification. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 3993–4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sutton, J.J.; Barnsley, J.E.; Mapley, J.I.; Wagner, P.; Officer, D.L.; Gordon, K.C. Modulation of Donor-Acceptor Distance in a Series of Carbazole Push-Pull Dyes; A Spectroscopic and Computational Study. Molecules 2018, 23, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zheng, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhai, S.; Zhang, H.; Shan, G.; Kwok, R.T.K.; Ma, C.; Sung, H.H.Y.; Williams, I.D.; Lam, J.W.Y.; et al. Highly efficient singlet oxygen generation, two-photon photodynamic therapy and melanoma ablation by rationally designed mitochondria-specific near-infrared AIEgens. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 2494–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Brzeczek, A.; Ledwon, P.; Data, P.; Zassowski, P.; Golba, S.; Walczak, K.; Lapkowski, M. Synthesis and properties of 1,3,5-tricarbazolylbenzenes with star-shaped architecture. Dye. Pigment. 2015, 113, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Michinobu, T.; May, J.C.; Lim, J.H.; Boudon, C.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Seiler, P.; Gross, M.; Biaggio, I.; Diederich, F. A new class of organic donor–acceptor molecules with large third-order optical nonlinearities. Chem. Commun. 2005, 737–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kivala, M.; Boudon, C.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Seiler, P.; Gross, M.; Diederich, F. A novel reaction of 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ): Charge-transfer chromophores by [2 + 2] cycloaddition with alkynes. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4731–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tang, X.; Liu, W.; Wu, J.; Lee, C.S.; You, J.; Wang, P. Synthesis, crystal structures, and photophysical properties of triphenylamine-based multicyano derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 7273–7278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Michinobu, T.; Satoh, N.; Cai, J.; Li, Y.; Han, L. Novel design of organic donor–acceptor dyes without carboxylic acid anchoring groups for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 3367–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wu, Y.; Marszalek, M.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, H.; Grätzel, M.; Zhu, W. High-conversion-efficiency organic dye-sensitized solar cells: Molecular engineering on D–A–π-A featured organic indoline dyes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 8261–8272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, S.; Jiao, Y.; Ding, Y.; Fan, X.; Song, J.; Mi, B.; Gao, Z. Position engineering of cyanoacrylic-acid anchoring group in a dye for DSSC applications. Dye. Pigment. 2020, 180, 108470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Haid, S.; Marszalek, M.; Mishra, A.; Wielopolski, M.; Teuscher, J.; Moser, J.-E.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M.; Bäuerle, P. Significant Improvement of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Performance by Small Structural Modification in π-Conjugated Donor–Acceptor Dyes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 1291–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pei, K.; Wu, Y.; Islam, A.; Zhang, Q.; Han, L.; Tian, H.; Zhu, W. Constructing High-Efficiency D–A−π–A-Featured Solar Cell Sensitizers: A Promising Building Block of 2,3-Diphenylquinoxaline for Antiaggregation and Photostability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 4986–4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Demeter, D.; Rousseau, T.; Roncali, J. 3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) as building block for the design of small molecular donors for organic solar cells. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 704–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tuladhar, S.M.; Azzouzi, M.; Delval, F.; Yao, J.; Guilbert, A.A.Y.; Kirchartz, T.; Montcada, N.F.; Dominguez, R.; Langa, F.; Palomares, E.; et al. Low Open-Circuit Voltage Loss in Solution-Processed Small-Molecule Organic Solar Cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Roncali, J.; Leriche, P.; Blanchard, P. Molecular Materials for Organic Photovoltaics: Small is Beautiful. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3821–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Antwi, B.Y.; Taylor, R.G.D.; Cameron, J.; Owoare, R.B.; Kingsford-Adaboh, R.; Skabara, P.J. Acceptor–donor–acceptor small molecules based on derivatives of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene for solution processed organic solar cells. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 98797–98803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ilina, K.; MacCuaig, W.M.; Laramie, M.; Jeouty, J.N.; McNally, L.R.; Henary, M. Squaraine Dyes: Molecular Design for Different Applications and Remaining Challenges. Bioconjugate Chem. 2020, 31, 194–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Schmidt, K.; Barlow, S.; Leclercq, A.; Zojer, E.; Jang, S.-H.; Marder, S.R.; Jen, A.K.Y.; Brédas, J.-L. Efficient acceptor groups for NLO chromophores: Competing inductive and resonance contributions in heterocyclic acceptors derived from 2-dicyanomethylidene-3-cyano-4,5,5-trimethyl-2,5-dihydrofuran. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 2944–2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Massin, J.; Dayoub, W.; Mulatier, J.-C.; Aronica, C.; Bretonnière, Y.; Andraud, C. Near-Infrared Solid-State Emitters Based on Isophorone: Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Spectroscopic Properties. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 862–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Masaret, G.S. Synthesis, antibacterial, photostability and molecular docking of novel push–pull dicyanomethylenedihydrofuran chromophores comprising antioxidant moieties. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2024, 18, 2297459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Thakare, S.S.; Chakraborty, G.; More, A.B.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Mula, S.; Ray, A.K.; Sekar, N. Modulation of optical properties of BODIPY fluorophore via intramolecular charge transfer. J. Lumin. 2018, 194, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ulrich, G.; Barsella, A.; Boeglin, A.; Niu, S.; Ziessel, R. BODIPY-Bridged Push–Pull Chromophores for Nonlinear Optical Applications. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2693–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Huang, C.; Qian, Y. CT-BODIPY with Donor-Acceptor Architecture: Red-AIE Property and Selective Interaction with BSA. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 2205–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Schäfer, C.; Mony, J.; Olsson, T.; Börjesson, K. Effect of the Aza-N-Bridge and Push–Pull Moieties: A Comparative Study between BODIPYs and Aza-BODIPYs. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 87, 2569–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Jiao, L.; Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; Hu, X.; Zhang, P.; Yu, C.; Cong, K.; Meng, Q.; Hao, E.; Vicente, M.G.H. Accessing Near-Infrared-Absorbing BF2-Azadipyrromethenes via a Push–Pull Effect. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 1830–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bai, L.; Sun, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hu, W.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Z.; Fan, Q.; Li, L.; Huang, W. Novel aza-BODIPY based small molecular NIR-II fluorophores for in vivo imaging. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 10920–10923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bloor, J.E.; Gilson, B.R.; Haas, R.J.; Zirkle, C.L. Electron-donating properties of phenothiazine and related compounds. J. Med. Chem. 1970, 13, 922–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sun, W.; Sun, P.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Wu, J.; Tian, Y. Syntheses, crystal structures, nonlinear optical properties and cis-trans isomerization of functionalized sulfur-terminal [Zn(II) and Cd(II)] complexes based on phenothiazine-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine conjugated ligands. Dye. Pigment. 2015, 115, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Cao, T.; Cai, Q.; Zeng, C.; Fu, H.; Hu, L. A methylene blue-based near-infrared fluorescent probe for rapid detection of hypochlorite in tap water and living cells. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 14603–14608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, S.; Li, B.; Zhang, F. Molecular Fluorophores for Deep-Tissue Bioimaging. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 1302–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wong, M.Y.; Leung, L.M. Phenothiazine-oxadiazole push-pull fluorophores: Combining high quantum efficiency, excellent electrochemical stability and facile functionalization. Dye. Pigment. 2017, 145, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bianconi, T.; Cesaretti, A.; Mancini, P.; Montegiove, N.; Calzoni, E.; Ekbote, A.; Misra, R.; Carlotti, B. Room-Temperature Phosphorescence and Cellular Phototoxicity Activated by Triplet Dynamics in Aggregates of Push–Pull Phenothiazine-Based Isomers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2023, 127, 1385–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Chaudhary, S.; Mukherjee, M.; Paul, T.K.; Bishnoi, S.; Taraphder, S.; Milton, M.D. Novel Phenothiazine-5-oxide Based Push-Pull Molecules: Synthesis and Fine-Tuning of Electronic, Optical and Thermal Properties. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 5073–5081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hsieh, T.-S.; Wu, J.-Y.; Chang, C.-C. Multiple fluorescent behaviors of phenothiazine-based organic molecules. Dye. Pigment. 2015, 112, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gong, J.; Han, J.; Liu, Q.; Ren, X.; Wei, P.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Dong, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. An ideal platform of light-emitting materials from phenothiazine: Facile preparation, tunable red/NIR fluorescence, bent geometry-promoted AIE behaviour and selective lipid-droplet (LD) tracking ability. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 4185–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Levitz, A.; Marmarchi, F.; Henary, M. Introduction of various substitutions to the methine bridge of heptamethine cyanine dyes Via substituted dianil linkers. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2018, 17, 1409–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mojzych, M.; Henary, M. Synthesis of Cyanine Dyes. In Heterocyclic Polymethine Dyes: Synthesis, Properties and Applications; Strekowski, L., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  84. So, P.T.C. Two-photon Fluorescence Light Microscopy. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences; Macmillan Publishers Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  85. He, G.S.; Tan, L.-S.; Zheng, Q.; Prasad, P.N. Multiphoton Absorbing Materials:  Molecular Designs, Characterizations, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1245–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Huang, C.; Wang, Q.; Yan, X. Dicyanostilbene-Derived Highly Sensitive Two-Photon Fluorescence Temperature Probe for Live Cell Imaging. ChemistrySelect 2024, 9, e202303433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mei, J.; Hong, Y.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Qin, A.; Tang, Y.; Tang, B.Z. Aggregation-Induced Emission: The Whole Is More Brilliant than the Parts. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 5429–5479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zhuang, J.; Pan, Q.; Zhou, C.; Cai, Z.; Li, N.; Zhao, N. The cyano positional isomerism strategy for constructing mitochondria-targeted AIEgens with type I reactive oxygen species generation capability. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12, 11359–11367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.-X.; Liu, D.; Ni, C.-C.; Ni, J.; Ni, J.-S. Structural isomerism engineering regulates molecular AIE behavior and application in visualizing endogenous hydrogen sulfide. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12, 11134–11141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Abdulrazzaq, O.A.; Saini, V.; Bourdo, S.; Dervishi, E.; Biris, A.S. Organic Solar Cells: A Review of Materials, Limitations, and Possibilities for Improvement. Part. Sci. Technol. 2013, 31, 427–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jao, M.-H.; Liao, H.-C.; Su, W.-F. Achieving a high fill factor for organic solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 5784–5801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Deibel, C.; Strobel, T.; Dyakonov, V. Role of the charge transfer state in organic donor-acceptor solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 4097–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, L.; Cole, J.M. Anchoring Groups for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 3427–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gong, J.; Sumathy, K.; Qiao, Q.; Zhou, Z. Review on dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs): Advanced techniques and research trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pitigala, P.K.D.D.P.; Henary, M.M.; Perera, A.G.U. Effects of physical orientation of dye molecules and molecular orbitals on performance of solid-state dye sensitized solar cells. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 23, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhao, N.; Li, M.; Yan, Y.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhao, Y.S.; Wong, K.S.; Tang, B.Z. A tetraphenylethene-substituted pyridinium salt with multiple functionalities: Synthesis, stimuli-responsive emission, optical waveguide and specific mitochondrion imaging. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 4640–4646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Meng, F.; Zhang, C.; Li, D.; Tian, Y. Aggregation induced emission-active two-photon absorption zwitterionic chromophore for bioimaging application. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 226, 117571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Antaris, A.L.; Chen, H.; Cheng, K.; Sun, Y.; Hong, G.; Qu, C.; Diao, S.; Deng, Z.; Hu, X.; Zhang, B.; et al. A small-molecule dye for NIR-II imaging. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sun, Y.; Qu, C.; Chen, H.; He, M.; Tang, C.; Shou, K.; Hong, S.; Yang, M.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, B.; et al. Novel benzo-bis(1,2,5-thiadiazole) fluorophores for in vivo NIR-II imaging of cancer. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 6203–6207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhu, S.; Yang, Q.; Antaris, A.L.; Yue, J.; Ma, Z.; Wang, H.; Huang, W.; Wan, H.; Wang, J.; Diao, S.; et al. Molecular imaging of biological systems with a clickable dye in the broad 800- to 1,700-nm near-infrared window. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 962–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Hu, W.; Liu, Z. A Mitochondrial-Targeting Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe for Visualizing and Monitoring Viscosity in Live Cells and Tissues. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 10302–10309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cesaretti, A.; Calzoni, E.; Montegiove, N.; Bianconi, T.; Alebardi, M.; La Serra, M.A.; Consiglio, G.; Fortuna, C.G.; Elisei, F.; Spalletti, A. Lighting-Up the Far-Red Fluorescence of RNA-Selective Dyes by Switching from Ortho to Para Position. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Islam, A.; Rabbani, M.; Bappy, M.H.; Miah, M.A.R.; Sakib, N. A review on fabrication process of organic light emitting diodes. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision (ICIEV), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 17–18 May 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  104. Zou, S.-J.; Shen, Y.; Xie, F.-M.; Chen, J.-D.; Li, Y.-Q.; Tang, J.-X. Recent advances in organic light-emitting diodes: Toward smart lighting and displays. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020, 4, 788–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bhatnagar, P.K. Organic Light-Emitting Diodes—A Review. In Nanomaterials and Their Applications; Khan, Z.H., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 261–287. [Google Scholar]
  106. Tang, C.W.; VanSlyke, S.A. Organic electroluminescent diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 913–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Szłapa, A.; Kula, S.; Błaszkiewicz, U.; Grucela, M.; Schab-Balcerzak, E.; Filapek, M. Simple donor–π–acceptor derivatives exhibiting aggregation-induced emission characteristics for use as emitting layer in OLED. Dye. Pigment. 2016, 129, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Venkatramaiah, N.; Kumar, G.D.; Chandrasekaran, Y.; Ganduri, R.; Patil, S. Efficient Blue and Yellow Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Enabled by Aggregation-Induced Emission. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 3838–3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Dumur, F. Carbazole-based polymers as hosts for solution-processed organic light-emitting diodes: Simplicity, efficacy. Org. Electron. 2015, 25, 345–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Krucaite, G.; Grigalevicius, S. A review on low-molar-mass carbazole- based derivatives for organic light emitting diodes. Synth. Met. 2019, 247, 90–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Nguyen, K.H.; Hao, Y.; Zeng, K.; Wei, X.; Yuan, S.; Li, F.; Fan, S.; Xu, M.; Liu, Y.-N. A reaction-based long-wavelength fluorescent probe for Cu2+ detection and imaging in living cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 358, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hien, N.K.; Bay, M.V.; Bao, N.C.; Vo, Q.V.; Cuong, N.D.; Thien, T.V.; Nhung, N.T.A.; Van, D.U.; Nam, P.C.; Quang, D.T. Coumarin-Based Dual Chemosensor for Colorimetric and Fluorescent Detection of Cu2+ in Water Media. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 21241–21249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Tomasulo, M.; Sortino, S.; White, A.J.P.; Raymo, F.M. Chromogenic Oxazines for Cyanide Detection. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 744–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zuo, H.; Wang, C.; Shen, Y. A novel colorimetric and fluorescent sensor for cyanide anions detection based on triphenylamine and benzothiadiazole. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 1244–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zou, Q.; Li, X.; Xu, Q.; Ågren, H.; Zhao, W.; Qu, Y. A near-infrared “on–off” fluorescent and colourimetric cyanide chemodosimeter based on phenothiazine with applications in living cell imaging. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 59809–59816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zheng, Z.-H.; Li, Z.-K.; Song, L.-J.; Wang, Q.-W.; Huang, Q.-F.; Yang, L. A Biocompatible Colorimetric Triphenylamine- Dicyanovinyl Conjugated Fluorescent Probe for Selective and Sensitive Detection of Cyanide Ion in Aqueous Media and Living Cells. Sensors 2017, 17, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Alsaeedi, H. Synthesis, characterization, antibacterial activity, and molecular docking of novel dicyanodihydrofuran-based push–pull fluorophores. Luminescence 2023, 38, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Gui, R.; Jin, H. Organic fluorophores-based molecular probes with dual-fluorescence ratiometric responses to in-vitro/in-vivo pH for biosensing, bioimaging and biotherapeutics applications. Talanta 2024, 275, 126171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Xia, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Whisman, N.; Bi, J.; Steenwinkel, T.E.; Wan, S.; Medford, J.; Tajiri, M.; Luck, R.L.; et al. Ratiometric fluorescent probes based on through-bond energy transfer of cyanine donors to near-infrared hemicyanine acceptors for mitochondrial pH detection and monitoring of mitophagy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 1603–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Munan, S.; Kottarathil, S.; Joseph, M.M.; Jana, A.; Ali, M.; Mapa, K.; Maiti, K.K.; Samanta, A. IndiFluors: A New Full-Visible Color-Tunable Donor–Acceptor–Donor (D1–A–D2) Fluorophore Family for Ratiometric pH Imaging during Mitophagy. ACS Sens. 2024, 9, 3502–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Yuan, D.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, B.; Yin, X.; Ye, J.; Zhou, X.; Wang, L. A ratiometric fluorescence probe for selective and sensitive detection of leucine aminopeptidase in lysosome. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 8364–8367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Representation of D-π-A fluorophores.
Figure 1. Representation of D-π-A fluorophores.
Biomolecules 15 00119 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of dyes 1a, 1c and 1f via Suzuki and Heck coupling reactions.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of dyes 1a, 1c and 1f via Suzuki and Heck coupling reactions.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch001
Figure 2. Representation of the D- π -A system containing SF5.
Figure 2. Representation of the D- π -A system containing SF5.
Biomolecules 15 00119 g002
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 2iazine c2ntaining fluorophores 57.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 2iazine c2ntaining fluorophores 57.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch002
Figure 3. D- π -A dyes’ diphenylamino donor, SF5 acceptor and different π linkers.
Figure 3. D- π -A dyes’ diphenylamino donor, SF5 acceptor and different π linkers.
Biomolecules 15 00119 g003
Figure 4. Energy band gap of fluorophores with SF5 acceptor from 1af [9].
Figure 4. Energy band gap of fluorophores with SF5 acceptor from 1af [9].
Biomolecules 15 00119 g004
Scheme 5. Synthesis of triphenylamine core structures.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of triphenylamine core structures.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch005
Figure 6. Structures of fluorophores with triphenylamine core.
Figure 6. Structures of fluorophores with triphenylamine core.
Biomolecules 15 00119 g006
Scheme 6. Synthesis of fluorophores with pyrimidine acceptor core.
Scheme 6. Synthesis of fluorophores with pyrimidine acceptor core.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch006
Scheme 7. Synthesis of fluorophores with pyrimidine core as acceptor unit.
Scheme 7. Synthesis of fluorophores with pyrimidine core as acceptor unit.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch007
Figure 7. Structure of fluorene containing fluorophores.
Figure 7. Structure of fluorene containing fluorophores.
Biomolecules 15 00119 g007
Scheme 8. Synthesis of tripolar fluorophore with pyrimidine acceptor core.
Scheme 8. Synthesis of tripolar fluorophore with pyrimidine acceptor core.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch008
Figure 8. Structure of BODIPY unit.
Figure 8. Structure of BODIPY unit.
Biomolecules 15 00119 g008
Scheme 9. Synthesis of fluorene containing fluorophores.
Scheme 9. Synthesis of fluorene containing fluorophores.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch009
Figure 9. Electronic diagram showing one- and two-photon absorption processes.
Figure 9. Electronic diagram showing one- and two-photon absorption processes.
Biomolecules 15 00119 g009
Scheme 10. Synthesis of D-π-A fluorophores with benzothiazole and diphenylamino groups.
Scheme 10. Synthesis of D-π-A fluorophores with benzothiazole and diphenylamino groups.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch010
Figure 10. (A) HeLa cells stained with carbazole containing fluorophores 63, 64, 68 and 69 (from left to right), Mitotracker Green and merged images. (B) Fluorescence images of normal cells (HLF and LX2) and cancer cells (HepG2, B16, A549 and HeLa) stained with fluorophore 69 (1   μ M). (C) Relative fluorescence intensity of different cells incubated with fluorophore 69 for 30 min. (Reproduced from open access article [49]).
Figure 10. (A) HeLa cells stained with carbazole containing fluorophores 63, 64, 68 and 69 (from left to right), Mitotracker Green and merged images. (B) Fluorescence images of normal cells (HLF and LX2) and cancer cells (HepG2, B16, A549 and HeLa) stained with fluorophore 69 (1   μ M). (C) Relative fluorescence intensity of different cells incubated with fluorophore 69 for 30 min. (Reproduced from open access article [49]).
Biomolecules 15 00119 g010
Scheme 11. Synthesis of fluorophores 51ac with carbazole donor unit.
Scheme 11. Synthesis of fluorophores 51ac with carbazole donor unit.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch011
Figure 11. NIR-II images of (a) mouse hind limb (c) brain. Emission intensity profiles of the images (a,c), respectively, in (b,d), (e) NIR-II images of 4T1 tumor at different times after the injection, (f) ex vivo studies of fluorophore 113 NPs at 4 h under 808 nm laser radiation, (g) signal-to-background ratio of tumor at different times. (Reproduced with permission from [72]).
Figure 11. NIR-II images of (a) mouse hind limb (c) brain. Emission intensity profiles of the images (a,c), respectively, in (b,d), (e) NIR-II images of 4T1 tumor at different times after the injection, (f) ex vivo studies of fluorophore 113 NPs at 4 h under 808 nm laser radiation, (g) signal-to-background ratio of tumor at different times. (Reproduced with permission from [72]).
Biomolecules 15 00119 g011
Scheme 12. Synthesis of fluorophores 5557 with alternating length of thiophene bridge.
Scheme 12. Synthesis of fluorophores 5557 with alternating length of thiophene bridge.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch012
Figure 12. Fluorescence microscopy images of A549 cells with DAPI, (a) styryl dye with pyridinium acceptor and (b) styryl dye with quinolinium acceptor. Image reproduced from open access article [102].
Figure 12. Fluorescence microscopy images of A549 cells with DAPI, (a) styryl dye with pyridinium acceptor and (b) styryl dye with quinolinium acceptor. Image reproduced from open access article [102].
Biomolecules 15 00119 g012
Scheme 13. Synthesis of fluorophores 61a and 61b with thiophene linker.
Scheme 13. Synthesis of fluorophores 61a and 61b with thiophene linker.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch013
Figure 13. Cytotoxicity data of fluorophores 131134 compared to docetaxel, against triple negative breast cancer cell lines (image reproduced from [15]).
Figure 13. Cytotoxicity data of fluorophores 131134 compared to docetaxel, against triple negative breast cancer cell lines (image reproduced from [15]).
Biomolecules 15 00119 g013
Scheme 14. Synthesis of fluorophores 63 and 64 with carbazole donor unit.
Scheme 14. Synthesis of fluorophores 63 and 64 with carbazole donor unit.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch014
Figure 14. Emission profiles of probes containing quinolinium units 140 (Probe A) and 141 (Probe B), each with 10 μ M, in varying NADH concentrations of 0–50 μ M in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer containing 10% DMSO. (Image reproduced with permission from [102]).
Figure 14. Emission profiles of probes containing quinolinium units 140 (Probe A) and 141 (Probe B), each with 10 μ M, in varying NADH concentrations of 0–50 μ M in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer containing 10% DMSO. (Image reproduced with permission from [102]).
Biomolecules 15 00119 g014
Scheme 15. Synthesis of fluorophores 68 and 69 with carbazole linker unit.
Scheme 15. Synthesis of fluorophores 68 and 69 with carbazole linker unit.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch015
Scheme 16. Synthesis of monoiodinated and diiodinated carbazole moieties.
Scheme 16. Synthesis of monoiodinated and diiodinated carbazole moieties.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch016
Scheme 17. Synthesis of star-shaped carbazole donor containing fluorophores.
Scheme 17. Synthesis of star-shaped carbazole donor containing fluorophores.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch017
Scheme 18. Synthesis of fluorophores 83a,b and 86a,b with tetracyano acceptor group.
Scheme 18. Synthesis of fluorophores 83a,b and 86a,b with tetracyano acceptor group.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch018
Scheme 19. Quinoxaline linker containing fluorophores with cyanoacetic acid acceptor unit and bulky donor units.
Scheme 19. Quinoxaline linker containing fluorophores with cyanoacetic acid acceptor unit and bulky donor units.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch019
Scheme 20. Synthesis of EDOT containing fluorophores 9395.
Scheme 20. Synthesis of EDOT containing fluorophores 9395.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch020
Scheme 21. Synthesis of fluorophores 9799 with TCF acceptor unit.
Scheme 21. Synthesis of fluorophores 9799 with TCF acceptor unit.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch021
Scheme 22. Synthesis of tetracyano moiety containing fluorophores.
Scheme 22. Synthesis of tetracyano moiety containing fluorophores.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch022
Scheme 23. Synthesis of aza-BODIPY dyes with CF3, CN, NMe2 and NMe3+ groups 106109.
Scheme 23. Synthesis of aza-BODIPY dyes with CF3, CN, NMe2 and NMe3+ groups 106109.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch023
Scheme 24. Synthesis of aza-BODIPY fluorophores in NIR-II region.
Scheme 24. Synthesis of aza-BODIPY fluorophores in NIR-II region.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch024
Scheme 25. Synthesis of fluorophores with phenothiazine donor 120 and 121.
Scheme 25. Synthesis of fluorophores with phenothiazine donor 120 and 121.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch025
Scheme 26. Synthesis of phenothiazine fluorophores.
Scheme 26. Synthesis of phenothiazine fluorophores.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch026
Scheme 27. Synthesis of fluorophores 131137 with chloroacrylic acid moiety.
Scheme 27. Synthesis of fluorophores 131137 with chloroacrylic acid moiety.
Biomolecules 15 00119 sch027
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ersoy, G.; Henary, M. Roadmap for Designing Donor-π-Acceptor Fluorophores in UV-Vis and NIR Regions: Synthesis, Optical Properties and Applications. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010119

AMA Style

Ersoy G, Henary M. Roadmap for Designing Donor-π-Acceptor Fluorophores in UV-Vis and NIR Regions: Synthesis, Optical Properties and Applications. Biomolecules. 2025; 15(1):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ersoy, Guliz, and Maged Henary. 2025. "Roadmap for Designing Donor-π-Acceptor Fluorophores in UV-Vis and NIR Regions: Synthesis, Optical Properties and Applications" Biomolecules 15, no. 1: 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010119

APA Style

Ersoy, G., & Henary, M. (2025). Roadmap for Designing Donor-π-Acceptor Fluorophores in UV-Vis and NIR Regions: Synthesis, Optical Properties and Applications. Biomolecules, 15(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15010119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop