Next Article in Journal
Petroselinic Acid from Apiaceae Family Plants Ameliorates Autoimmune Disorders Through Suppressing Cytosolic-Nucleic-Acid-Mediated Type I Interferon Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
From Molecular Therapies to Lysosomal Transplantation and Targeted Drug Strategies: Present Applications, Limitations, and Future Prospects of Lysosomal Medications
Previous Article in Special Issue
[18F]NaF PET/CT as a Marker for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications in Bone Disorders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

FOP: From Biomolecules to Hope

by
Frederick S. Kaplan
1,2,3,* and
Robert J. Pignolo
4
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
2
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
3
Center for Research in FOP and Related Disorders, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
4
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2025, 15(3), 328; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15030328
Submission received: 5 February 2025 / Accepted: 7 February 2025 / Published: 24 February 2025
In the introduction to his 1970 textbook BIOCHEMISTRY, Albert Lehninger wrote “Living things are composed of lifeless molecules [1]”. More than half a century and worlds of insight later, we know a lot more about those lifeless molecules, the genes that encode them, the pathways they belong to, and the lifelong devastation that errors in those lifeless molecules may wreak. There may be no greater illustration of that than the second skeleton of heterotopic bone of the ultra-rare disorder fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) [2].
The mystery of FOP began to fade in 2006 with the discovery of the FOP gene—a transformative event that stimulated the development of genetically correct mouse models and novel therapeutics that fueled the advent of clinical trials [3,4].
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), a disorder of congenital skeletal malformations and progressive extraskeletal ossification, is the most severe form of heterotopic ossification (HO) in humans [2]. Gain-of-function mutations in Activin A Receptor Type I (ACVR1), a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type 1 receptor, cause FOP by dramatically altering the normal physiologic functions of ACVR1, impacting BMP signaling as well as interacting pathways [3,5,6,7]. Gain-of-function mutations in ACVR1 emerge as the ultimate origin of all FOP phenotypes [8].
A father of a young child with FOP asked of us, “How will the discovery of the gene help my child?” The answer is clear. The FOP gene discovery means hope. The FOP gene discovery enabled the development of animal models of FOP, which have been instrumental in testing novel therapeutics for druggable targets [4]. Animal models validated the dysregulated BMP signaling pathway in FOP and opened the door to understanding the pathophysiology of heterotopic ossification (HO) in FOP as well as the discovery of the progenitor cells responsible for HO in FOP. Dramatic basic science discoveries of the biomolecules that are responsible for the emergent properties of FOP coupled with a comprehensive understanding of the natural history of FOP fueled the advent of clinical trials for FOP—a dazzling place to be for an ultra-rare condition that had existed in the backwaters of medicine for over three centuries [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
In a transformative article entitled “A New Grammar for Drug Discovery”, Fishman and Porter argue that signaling pathways in cells provide the “right level” for drug discovery [18]. The current dynamic landscape of FOP research is firmly based on the signaling pathways and evolving targets that are being revealed at rapid speed.
This Special Issue of Biomolecules, “Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP): From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies”, aims to explore the connection between molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies that are currently being explored in FOP, and by extension in more common disorders of HO that plague millions of individuals worldwide. This Special Issue of Biomolecules includes reviews as well as original research papers from experts in the field, providing the reader with advances in the understanding of FOP as well non-genetic forms of HO.
These articles encompass a broad range of topics that address the molecular genetics of FOP, developmental pathways in FOP, immunological aspects of FOP, molecular crosstalk in seminal pathways leading to HO in FOP, senescence-mediated pathways in FOP, progenitor cells that orchestrate HO in FOP, molecular imaging in FOP, gene therapy in FOP, pharmaceutical perspectives in FOP and non-genetic forms of HO.
Towler and colleagues comprehensively review the molecular biology of FOP and emphasize that missense mutations in the ACVR1 gene lead to severe degenerative arthropathy and joint ankylosis independently of HO. Importantly, the authors indicate that in the same way that studying the genetic cause of HO has advanced our understanding of HO initiation and progression, insight into the roles of ACVR1 signaling during tissue development, particularly in the musculoskeletal system, can be gained from examining altered skeletal development in individuals with FOP. In addition, Towler and colleagues point out that ACVR1 is ubiquitously expressed in multiple tissues during development and may lead to a litany of less common, non-skeletal symptoms [19].
Progressive HO is the most dreaded complication of FOP and is stimulated by inflammatory triggers. In a comprehensive review of the immunological aspects of FOP, Diolintzi and colleagues explore the central and pivotal role of inflammatory mediators in HO suggesting that the immune system may be a common target for blocking HO in both FOP and non-genetic forms of HO [20].
Pignolo and colleagues describe cellular senescence as a critical hallmark of aging and explain how it is thought to be a tumor-suppressive phenomenon with characteristic features of irreversible growth arrest and apoptosis resistance, as well as a critical component of inflammation through the inflammatory senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Importantly, they review possible roles for cellular senescence in the inflammatory trigger and microenvironment of incipient HO and how targeting senescent cells may provide new therapeutic approaches to both FOP and acquired forms of HO [21].
Cellular hypoxia, a vital aspect of inflammation, promotes HO by amplifying BMP signaling [22,23]. In a comprehensive review, Wang and colleagues visit the recent progress on the mechanisms of the HIF-1α and mTOR pathways in the amplification of HO lesions in FOP and discuss strategies for the inhibition of HIF-1α and mTOR pathways in FOP as well as in non-genetic forms of HO [24].
Srinivasan and colleagues review the important role of Activin A as a therapeutic target in FOP and recount the discovery of Activin A as an obligate ligand of mutant ACVR1 [25,26,27]. They describe how the importance of Activin A in FOP led to a phase 2 clinical trial of an investigational antibody that blocks Activin A in patients with FOP [14]. They go on to review the role of Activin A in fibroadipogenic progenitors, the cells in muscle tissue that form HO, and the discovery of non-signaling complexes between Activin A and wild-type ACVR1 and their role in tempering HO in FOP mouse models [28,29].
Cong and Yang delve deeply into the biomolecular underworld and uncover the crucial role of the Yap–Ihh axis in the pathogenesis of FOP and suggest that the inhibition of Ihh or Yap may offer a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent and reduce HO in FOP and other genetic and sporadic forms of HO [30].
In an original article, Groppe and colleagues explore the structural–functional basis for the canonical gain of function ACVR1R206H mutation in FOP. This detailed investigation into the three-dimensional modeling of ACVR1 offers new insights into the inhibition of mutant ACVR1 and avenues for novel treatment strategies [31].
In an original article, Burdick and colleagues present data that identify sex as a critical variable in translational and pre-clinical studies of FOP, and signal caution to investigators to consider sex in the design and interpretation of these studies [32].
Although plain radiography and computed tomography (CT) have been the mainstay of FOP clinical assessment and management, 18-fluor-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]NaF PET/CT) was introduced recently as an experimental marker for ossifying FOP activity. In a review, Zwama and colleagues address the applicability of [18F]NaF PET/CT imaging as an investigational monitoring modality in FOP and associated disorders of HO [33].
Gene therapy has been proposed as a possible therapy in FOP and other monogenic disorders that affect the skeletal system. In an original article, Yang and colleagues explore the adeno-associated virus (AAV) as a promising delivery vehicle for gene therapy as well as a potential therapeutic strategy to explore in suppressing HO in FOP [34].
All forms of HO result in an irreversible loss of mobility and an incredible increase in morbidity. The keys that unlock the mysteries of FOP have unlocked and will continue to unlock the mysteries of the much more common and sporadic forms of HO. Juan and colleagues review a wealth of important advancements made in the study of both sporadic HO and FOP to better diagnose, comprehend, prevent, and treat both [35]. The keys to the closet are, in fact, the keys to the kingdom.
We hope that the readers will enjoy reading this Special Issue of Biomolecules and that the findings presented here will help advance the understanding of FOP as well as more common and sporadic forms of HO.
Frederick S. Kaplan, M.D.
Robert J. Pignolo, M.D., Ph.D.
Guest Editors

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lehninger, A.L. Biochemistry. Pps. 833; Worth Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hüning, I.; Gillessen-Kaesbach, G. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Clinical course, genetic mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation. Mol. Syndromol. 2014, 5, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shore, E.M.; Xu, M.; Feldman, G.J.; Fenstermacher, D.A.; Cho, T.J.; Choi, I.H.; Connor, J.M.; Delai, P.; Glaser, D.L.; LeMerrer, M.; et al. A recurrent mutation in the BMP type I receptor ACVR1 causes inherited and sporadic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chakkalakal, S.A.; Shore, E.M. Heterotopic ossification in mouse models of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. In Bone Morphogenetic Proteins: Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 1891, pp. 247–255. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaplan, F.S.; Xu, M.; Seemann, P.; Connor, J.M.; Glaser, D.L.; Carroll, L.; Delai, P.; Fastnacht-Urban, E.; Forman, S.J.; Gillessen-Kaesbach, G.; et al. Classic and atypical fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotypes are caused by mutations in the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type I receptor ACVR1. Hum. Mutat. 2009, 30, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mejias Rivera, L.; Shore, E.M.; Mourkioti, F. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of heterotopic ossification in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wu, M.; Wu, S.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.P. The roles and regulatory mechanisms of TGF-β and BMP signaling in bone and cartilage development, homeostasis and disease. Cell Res. 2024, 34, 101–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kaplan, F.S.; Shore, E.M.; Pignolo, R.J. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva emerges from obscurity. Trends Mol. Med. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hong, C.C.; Yu, P.B. Applications of small molecule BMP inhibitors in physiology and disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009, 20, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Davis, A.J.; Brooijmans, N.; Brubaker, J.D.; Stevison, F.; LaBranche, T.P.; Albayya, F.; Fleming, P.; Hodous, B.L.; Kim, J.L.; Kim, S.; et al. An ALK2 inhibitor, BLU-782, prevents heterotopic ossification in a mouse model of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Sci. Transl. Med. 2024, 16, eabp8334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Williams, E.; Bagarova, J.; Kerr, G.; Xia, D.D.; Place, E.S.; Dey, D.; Shen, Y.; Bocobo, G.A.; Mohedas, A.H.; Huang, X.; et al. Saracatinib is an efficacious clinical candidate for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e95042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shimono, K.; Tung, W.E.; Macolino, C.; Chi, A.H.; Didizian, J.H.; Mundy, C.; Chandraratna, R.A.; Mishina, Y.; Enomoto-Iwamoto, M.; Pacifici, M.; et al. Potent inhibition of heterotopic ossification by nuclear retinoic acid receptor-γ agonists. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pignolo, R.J.; Hsiao, E.C.; Al Mukaddam, M.; Baujat, G.; Berglund, S.K.; Brown, M.A.; Cheung, A.M.; De Cunto, C.; Delai, P.; Haga, N.; et al. Reduction of new heterotopic ossification (HO) in the open-label, phase 3 MOVE trial of palovarotene for fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). J. Bone Miner. Res. 2023, 38, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Di Rocco, M.; Forleo-Neto, E.; Pignolo, R.J.; Keen, R.; Orcel, P.; Funck-Brentano, T.; Roux, C.; Kolta, S.; Madeo, A.; Bubbear, J.S.; et al. Garetosmab in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Nat. Med. 2023, 29, 2615–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lounev, V.; Groppe, J.C.; Brewer, N.; Wentworth, K.L.; Smith, V.; Xu, M.; Schomburg, L.; Bhargava, P.; Al Mukaddam, M.; Hsiao, E.C.; et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 deficiency confers resilience in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva in a man and mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2024, 39, 382–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wein, M.N.; Yang, Y. Actionable disease insights from bedside-to-bench investigation in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2024, 39, 375–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pignolo, R.J.; Baujat, G.; Brown, M.A.; De Cunto, C.; Hsiao, E.C.; Keen, R.; Al Mukaddam, M.; Le Quan Sang, K.H.; Wilson, A.; Marino, R.; et al. The natural history of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: A prospective, global 36-month study. Genet. Med. 2022, 24, 2422–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fishman, M.C.; Porter, J.A. Pharmaceuticals: A new grammar for drug discovery. Nature 2005, 437, 491–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Towler, O.W.; Shore, E.M.; Kaplan, F.S. Molecular developmental biology of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: Measuring the giant by its toe. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Diolintzi, A.; Pervin, M.S.; Hsiao, E.C. Immunologic aspects in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pignolo, R.J.; Kaplan, F.S.; Wang, H. Cell senescence in heterotopic ossification. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.; Lindborg, C.; Lounev, V.; Kim, J.H.; McCarrick-Walmsley, R.; Xu, M.; Mangiavini, L.; Groppe, J.C.; Shore, E.M.; Schipani, E.; et al. Cellular hypoxia promotes heterotopic ossification by amplifying BMP signaling. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016, 31, 1652–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Agarwal, S.; Loder, S.; Brownley, C.; Cholok, D.; Mangiavini, L.; Li, J.; Breuler, C.; Sung, H.H.; Li, S.; Ranganathan, K.; et al. Inhibition of Hif1α prevents both trauma-induced and genetic heterotopic ossification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E338–E347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, H.; Kaplan, F.S.; Pignolo, R.J. The HIF-1α and mTOR pathways amplify heterotopic ossification. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hatsell, S.J.; Idone, V.; Wolken, D.M.; Huang, L.; Kim, H.J.; Wang, L.; Wen, X.; Nannuru, K.C.; Jimenez, J.; Xie, L.; et al. ACVR1 R206H receptor mutation causes fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva by imparting responsiveness to activin A. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 303ra137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hino, K.; Horigome, K.; Nishio, M.; Komura, S.; Nagata, S.; Zhao, C.; Jin, Y.; Kawakami, K.; Yamada, Y.; Ohta, A.; et al. Activin-A enhances mTOR signaling to promote aberrant chondrogenesis in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3339–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Alessi Wolken, D.M.; Idone, V.; Hatsell, S.J.; Yu, P.B.; Economides, A.N. The obligatory role of Activin A in the formation of heterotopic bone in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva. Bone 2018, 109, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lees-Shepard, J.B.; Yamamoto, M.; Biswas, A.A.; Stoessel, S.J.; Nicholas, S.E.; Cogswell, C.A.; Devarakonda, P.M.; Schneider, M.J., Jr.; Cummins, S.M.; Legendre, N.P.; et al. Activin-dependent signaling in fibro/adipogenic progenitors causes fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Srinivasan, D.; Arostegui, M.; Goebel, E.J.; Hart, K.N.; Aykul, S.; Lees-Shepard, J.B.; Idone, V.; Hatsell, S.J.; Economides, A.N. How Activin A became a therapeutic Target in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cong, Q.; Yang, Y. Hedgehog signaling controls chondrogenesis and ectopic bone formation via the Yap-Ihh axis. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Groppe, J.C.; Lu, G.; Tandang-Silvas, M.R.; Pathi, A.; Konda, S.; Wu, J.; Le, V.Q.; Culbert, A.L.; Shore, E.M.; Wharton, K.A.; et al. Polypeptide substrate accessibility hypothesis: Gain-of-function R206H mutation allosterically affects activin receptor-like protein kinase activity. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Burdick, L.N.; DelVichio, A.H.; Hanson, L.R.; Griffith, B.B.; Bouchard, K.R.; Hunter, J.W.; Goldhamer, D.J. Sex as a critical variable in basic and pre-clinical studies of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zwama, J.; Rosenberg, N.M.; Verheij, V.A.; Raijmakers, P.G.H.M.; Yaqub, M.; Botman, E.; de Ruiter, R.D.; Garrelfs, M.R.; Bökenkamp, A.; Micha, D.; et al. [18F]NaF PET/CT as a Marker for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications in Bone Disorders. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, Y.S.; Lin, C.; Ma, H.; Xie, J.; Kaplan, F.S.; Gao, G.; Shim, J.H. AAV-Mediated targeting of the Activin A-ACVR1R206H signaling in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Juan, C.; Bancroft, A.C.; Choi, J.H.; Nunez, J.H.; Pagani, C.A.; Lin, Y.S.; Hsiao, E.C.; Levi, B. Intersections of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva and traumatic heterotopic ossification. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaplan, F.S.; Pignolo, R.J. FOP: From Biomolecules to Hope. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15030328

AMA Style

Kaplan FS, Pignolo RJ. FOP: From Biomolecules to Hope. Biomolecules. 2025; 15(3):328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15030328

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaplan, Frederick S., and Robert J. Pignolo. 2025. "FOP: From Biomolecules to Hope" Biomolecules 15, no. 3: 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15030328

APA Style

Kaplan, F. S., & Pignolo, R. J. (2025). FOP: From Biomolecules to Hope. Biomolecules, 15(3), 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15030328

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop