Next Article in Journal
Association of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine and Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Previous Article in Journal
RETRACTED: Ailanthone Induces Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in Melanoma B16 and A375 Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/biom9070276
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Throughput Screening of Chlorella Vulgaris Growth Kinetics inside a Droplet-Based Microfluidic Device under Irradiance and Nitrate Stress Conditions

by
Marwa Gamal Saad
1,2,*,
Noura Sayed Dosoky
3,*,
Muhammad Shuja Khan
4,
Mohamed Shafick Zoromba
5,6,
Laila Mekki
7,
Magdy El-Bana
2,
David Nobles
8 and
Hesham Mohamed Shafik
2
1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
2
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Port Said University, Port Said 42521, Egypt
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA
4
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA
5
Chemical and Materials Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh 21911, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Port-Said University, Port Said 42521, Egypt
7
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
8
UTEX Culture Collection of Algae, College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2019, 9(7), 276; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9070276
Submission received: 8 May 2019 / Revised: 7 July 2019 / Accepted: 11 July 2019 / Published: 12 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biodiesel is an eco-friendly renewable fuel that can be derived from microalgae. Maximization of biomass and lipid productivities are considered the main challenges for algal biodiesel production. Since conventional batch cultures are time-, space-, and reagent-consuming with many restrictions to apply many replicates, microfluidic technology has recently emerged as an alternative low-cost and efficient technology with high throughput repeatability and reproducibility. Different applications of microfluidic devices in algal biotechnology have been reported, including cell identification, sorting, trapping, and metabolic screening. In this work, Chlorella vulgaris was investigated by encapsulating in a simple droplet-based micro-array device at different light intensities of 20, 80, and 200 µmol/m2/s combined with different nitrate concentrations of 17.6, 8.8, and 4.4 mM. The growth results for C. vulgaris within microfluidic device were compared to the conventional batch culture method. In addition, the effect of combined stress of deficiencies in irradiance and nitrogen availability were studied to illustrate their impact on the metabolic profiling of microalgae. The results showed that the most optimum favorable culturing conditions for Chlorella vulgaris growth within the microfluidic channels were 17.6 mM and 80 µmol/m2/s.

1. Introduction

Microalgae are photosynthetic organisms and a promising feedstock for different products, such as antibiotics, cosmetics, toothpastes, alginates, agar [1,2,3], and renewable fuels, e.g., biodiesel, biohydrogen, and bioethanol [4,5], because they conserve water and land resources [6]. They can also be used as biofertilizers and bioremediators [7]. The history of using algae as a renewable energy feedstock dates back to the 1970s [4]. The main challenges for algae production are maximizing biomass and lipid productivities by optimizing culture and production conditions which are considered to be time and labor extensive. Different factors affect biomass and the behavior of algal cells [8]. These factors are species-specific and can be categorized into three groups: biological, chemical, and physical factors. Biological factors are species size, shape, age, and cell composition, while chemical factors include nutrients concentrations and availability, C:N and N:P ratios, and the physical factors cover light, temperature, and pH [9]. Testing multiple growth factors simultaneously provides multidimensional information on factors affecting the growth. Among those, photon flux and nitrogen availability are important factors that influence algal growth and its behavior over a period of time.
Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) is a eukaryotic unicellular chlorophyte [10]. It has been cultured for various commercial applications, like antioxidants, human nutrition, and bioremediation [11,12,13]. C. vulgaris was also cultured as a model strain for biofuel production in the U.S. and Europe [6]. Further, C. vulgaris can adapt to extreme conditions, such as 10–15% CO2 vol. % [14], high temperature [15], acidic pH [16], and up to 200 and 50 ppm of NO and SO2, respectively [14]. Traditional batch cultures have been used previously which provide appropriate biomass for fatty acid profiles, proteins, and carbohydrate analyses. However, they exhibit numerous disadvantages, such as limited numbers of replicates, restricted limits of testing factors, and are space-, reagent-, and time-consuming [17]. On the other hand, there has been tremendous interest recently to utilize microfluidic devices as a tool to investigate the microalgae under different conditions.
C. vulgaris has been tested inside microfluidics with different designs for a variety of purposes [18,19,20,21,22]. A microfluidic device (lab-on-a-chip) offers the capability to manipulate a very small volume of fluids; 10−6 to 10−18 L through connected microchannels with dimensions from 10 to 100 µm [23]. This reveals tremendous miniaturization capabilities and enables innovative ways of performing biotests without the need for conventional laboratory infrastructure [5]. Poly dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is the most popular polymer used for device fabrication especially for biological and chemical samples. PDMS is the most popular polymer used for device modeling because it is inexpensive, transparent, and biocompatible [23,24]. It further prevents solution evaporation for a certain time [25], and is more appropriate for analyses of biological and chemical samples than glass and silicon with faster prototyping and the possibility of electrosensing [26].
In this work, a microfluidic device capable of simultaneously testing different culture conditions using a single system design is presented. The design is based on creating separated channels parallel to each other. Each of these channels can be loaded with a different solution of nitrate concentration of 17.6, 8.8, and 4.4 mM. In addition, we sought to determine the feasibility of using the device as a monitoring tool in place of conventional batch techniques. We characterized the relationship between the availability of light and nitrate with the growth of C. vulgaris cells using both conventional culturing techniques and microfluidic techniques.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Droplet-Based Microfluidic Design

The droplet-based device was consisting of four parallel microfluidic devices (Figure 1). Each device was comprised of serpentine channels which were separated by a distance of about 160 µm. Four devices were located beside each other horizontally and the samples were processed simultaneously with constant flow rate. Inputs were used to facilitate droplet generation with one output for the waste. The two inputs were presented as two inlet channels: a 200 µm wide channel for the carrier oil and a 160 µm wide channel for the cell suspension. Channels had narrower width compared to the utilized droplet size to slightly squeeze the droplets to maintain consistent space between neighboring droplets. This provides precise droplet ordering for time-course growth analysis of the same droplet, and further prevents unexpected droplet merging throughout the culturing period [18].

2.2. Device Fabrication

The design of the device was performed using SOLIDWORKS® software (SolidWorks Corp., Waltham, MA, USA). The design was patterned on a silicon wafer surface with SU-8 photoresist (SU-8 2075, Microchem Corp., Westborough, MA, USA) using a conventional photolithography process then coated with the surfactant (tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl) trichlorosilane (United Chemical Technologies, Inc., Bristol, PA, USA) to facilitate PDMS release from the master molds. Afterwards, the fabrication process ended with PDMS molding. PDMS layer with a thickness of 4 mm were bonded with a glass slide of 50.8 × 9.0 × 76.2 mm by oxygen plasma treatment. After assembly, PDMS devices were loaded with Aquapel (Pittsburgh Glass Works LLC., Pittsburgh, PA, USA) to generate hydrophobic properties inside channels’ surfaces to stabilize droplets.

2.3. Species Preparation

A freshwater C. vulgaris was isolated from Port Said, Egypt. The species was purified on a solidified BG11 medium [27]. C. vulgaris was examined for early identification using binocular light microscope (SME-F4D, Rating: 85 V to 265 V, 50/60 Hz, Halogen lamp: 60 V 20 W, delay-action fuse: 1 A). Axenic culture was prepared using antibiotic assessment technique. One capsule of Chloramphenicol was dissolved in 10 mL 70% ethanol (capsule, MEHTA, India) then added to the culture which left to grow for two days then samples were streaked on nutrient agar medium for the confirmation of culture free-bacteria. Axenic colonies were cultured in 10 mL BG11 medium for five days at 20 °C and 80 ± 0.13 µmol/m2/s with continuous lighting. The culture volume was gradually increased per two weeks by 10% (v/v) to maintain cells. These cultures were used as stock cultures for next experiments. All steps were done under aseptic conditions. Purified samples were examined using Olympus® microscope with magnification power of 400×.

2.4. Species Identification

C. vulgaris was identified using the 23S rRNA gene. Genomic DNA was purified as previously described [28]. The quality and quantity of purified DNA was assessed using a NanoDrop® (ND-1000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, USA). The 23s rDNA was amplified by PCR, as described previously [29], using Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (2700 Applied Biosystems, Gene Amp®, Singapore) and 40–100 ng of genomic DNA per 100 µl reaction. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min followed by a hold at 4 °C. Two 23S rDNA primers were included, 23U1 (5′-AGG GGT AAA ACA CTA TTT CG-3′) and 23U2 (5′-CCT TCT CCC GAA GTT ACG-3′) [29]. Sanger DNA sequencing was performed by the University of Texas DNA sequencing facility using Applied Biosystems 3730/3730XL DNA Analyzers and BigDye Terminator v3.1 chemistry according to facility protocols. Bioinformatics analysis of the amplified sequence was performed by comparing similar sequences on the NCBI database via BLAST (Figure 2).

2.5. Droplet Generation

Cell suspension of C. vulgaris with concentration of 2002 ± 20.3 × 104 cells/ mL was loaded to 1 mL syringe. The carrier oil; 3M™ Fluorinert™ Liquid FC-40 oil (Maplewood, MN, USA) with 2.5% surfactant (008-FluoroSurfactant, Ran Biotechnologies, MA, USA) was loaded to another 1 mL syringe. Syringes were connected separately to the channels’ inlets using tubing. The flow of fluids inside syringes were automatically controlled using Fusion Touch 400 pump (Chemyx Inc., Stafford, TX, USA). As described previously [30], the 270-µm droplets were generated by consistently flowing cell suspension and oil with flow rates of 150 and 300 µL/h, respectively [31]. After 5 min, approximately 100 uniform droplets were captured inside each channel. Most droplets had one to three cells. Droplets maintained in that device without reported merging issues for monitoring growth. Each channel in the device was loaded with different sodium nitrate concentration of 17.6, 8.8, and 4.4 mM. After loading all channels with samples, different devices were subjected to different light intensity of 20 ± 0.31, 80 ± 0.37, and 200 ± 0.39 µmol/m2/s using LED lamps with 100w and 6500 K at 20 °C.

2.6. Traditional Batch Cultures

Inoculations were prepared by adding a biomass concentration of 1128 ± 24 × 104 cell/mL to 10 mL of BG11 medium. BG11 medium with different sodium nitrate concentrations of 17.6, 8.8, and 4.4 mM were examined. Each set of nitrate cultures was tested under different light intensity of 20.88 ± 1, 80.17 ± 1, and 200.4 ± 1 µmol/m2/s at 20 °C.

2.7. Growth Assay Inside Droplets

Tracking the growth of C. vulgaris cells encapsulated inside the same droplet in the culture channels allowed a time-course growth analysis, where the growth of cells was characterized by chlorophyll autofluorescence intensity per unit area. At scheduled analysis periods, each device was moved to the Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, LLC) stage to be imaged separately. The microscope was equipped with a digital camera (Orca Flash2.8 CMOS Camera) and a filter set (excitation: 460–500 nm, emission > 600 nm). The tiles were set and marked to locate each channel during imaging. The lenses were set on powers of 10 × 5.
The resulted fluorescent intensity of cells was analyzed using ImageJ software [31]. The maximum growth rate was calculated using the following equation [32]:
µ (d−1) = ln(N2 − N1)/T2 − T1
where N2 andN1 are the chlorophyll intensity at the times t2 and t1, respectively. The linear relationship between the cell number/droplet (count/mL) and the relative fluorescent intensity was investigated. Cell number/relative fluorescent intensity equations are as follows:
Y = 5.594X
 R2 = 0.9949
where Y is the relative fluorescent intensity (a.u.) and X is the cell number/droplet (count/mL). The results are presented as the cell number per droplet for 10 replicates and standard deviation was considered.

2.8. Growth Assay for Traditional Batch Cultures

At constant times, cultures were well-shaken then 10 µL of representative samples were loaded in a hemocytometer and counted in four 16 × 16 squares using Nikon light microscopy [33]. Then the summation of cells was multiplied by 104 to estimate the cell number per mL. Two replicates were counted for each sample and the standard deviation were considered.

3. Results and Discussion

Nitrogen is important for DNA, protein, enzyme, and membrane synthesis. Nitrate (NO3−) and ammonia (NH4+) are the most common nitrogen forms which algae can uptake [34]. The impact of the nitrogen regime on the growth and fatty acids profiles of Desmodesmus quadricaudatus and Chlorella sp. has been studied [35]. Further, the growth of C. vulgaris has also been significantly enhanced with an increase in light intensity as reported elsewhere [36,37,38]. There are a few other reports published on the metabolic profiling of microalgae cultivated under the combined stress of deficiencies in irradiance and nitrogen availability [39]. Optimum cultivation and production conditions are species-specific [40].
A simple droplet-based platform was used to simultaneously investigate the effect of different culture conditions (light intensity and nitrate availability) on the growth of C. vulgaris. The chlorophyll autofluorescence was initially induced using pulse-amplitude-modulating fluorometry, then correlated to carbon dioxide assimilation [41]. It is based on the energy of the absorbed photon by the chlorophyll molecule. That energy will be either used to drive the electron transfer in photosystem II with an opened reaction center or to excite the fluorescence under low light intensities. With increasing the light intensity, the reaction center of photosystem II will close, the electron transfer will cease, and the fluorescence will rise. Relationship between light over time (A) and relation between uniform area (cm2) and light intensity (µmol/m2/s) (B) are shown in Figure S1. Therefore, the observation of chlorophyll autofluorescence’s induction with its relationship to reactions’ efficiency inside photosystem II provides a rapid and non-destructive method to quantify the quantum yield of photosynthesis [42].
Growth of Chlorella vulgaris was observed over the period of time at different light intensities (20, 80, and 200 µmol/m2/s) and different nitrate conditions (17.6, 8.8, and 4.4 mM) using both the conventional batch cultures (Figure 3) and the microfluidic device (Figure 4). The results for C. vulgaris culture growth was significant in both techniques within three days of cultivation. The growth was increased with an increase in the concentration of the nitrate and the light intensity. However, the growth behavior of C. vulgaris suspended in the regular batch culture showed that the growth was limited at 20 µmol/m2/s for all nitrate concentrations, whereas 80 µmol/m2/s was reported to be the optimum light intensity conditions for C. vulgaris growth. Experimental data shown in Figure 3 were collected up to 72 h and C. vulgaris suspended in BG11 medium inside 270 µm droplets did not show being static with in the microfluidic channels. However, these experiments could be extended for a longer period of time if required as the microdroplets can also be used for a longer time period for continuous monitoring.
Based on the experimental evidence presented in this work, the most optimum favorable culturing conditions for Chlorella vulgaris growth within the microfluidic channels were 17.6 mM and 80 µmol/m2/s. These results are consistent with previous reports where the decreased growth of C. vulgaris has been reported at the lower nitrate concentration [10,43,44,45]. On the other hand, no significant decrease in C. vulgaris growth was reported with decreasing nitrate concentration [15]. To further optimize the effect of nitrate concentration on C. vulgaris growth rate, Jeanfils et al. established a limitation of linear relationship of the C. vulgaris growth rate with respect to the nitrate concentration [46].
Our results are in agreement with Kim et al., [47] who tested the influence of light intensity on Botryococcus braunii growth in a microfluidic device and found a 1.8-fold increase compared to bulk cultures. Moreover, our comparison investigations concurred with Dewan et al., [48] who investigated the growth kinetics of the microalgae, C. vulgaris, in immobilized arrays of nanoliter-scale microfluidic drops and found that the growth rates inside droplets were higher than bulk-scale experiments in most cases. Sung et al., reported the photoautotrophic growth of C. vulgaris after culturing cells for 120 h in a droplet-based photobioreactor; a round micropillar array. The growth kinetics were tested under different CO2 concentrations (1%, 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5%) and light intensities (35, 55, 100, 150, and 200 μmol/m2/s). The growth in a microdroplet showed better cell growth performance compared to a flask culture due to the reduced shading effects and improved mass transfer [49].
Our results are different from those reported by Kim et al., [50] where on-chip results were consistent with bulk culture results for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultured in an n-hexane-compatible lab-on-a-disc under nitrogen, acetic acid, and iron depletion. Kuntanawat et al. [51] studied the same growth habit of Spirulina platensis cultivated in both culturing systems. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella vulgaris, and Dunaliella tertiolecta growth were compared in a simple droplet-based microfluidic system and bulk cultures for 10 days. However, cell viability in the microfluidic device was lower than bulk cultures, and that the doubling time of microalgae grown in microdroplets was similar to growth in bulk [52]. C. vulgaris has been encapsulated inside 26 µm droplets with alginate hydrogel microcapsules in a microwell array that incorporated a microbridge structure. A comparison of growth results with those of off-chip cultures demonstrated similar outcomes [21]. Our results were also different from Perin et al. [53], where microfluidic results were 10-fold lower than bulk cultures as a result of culturing Nannochloropsis gaditana under different light intensities (6, 60, or 360 μmol/m2/s).
Since the growth rates of photoautotrophic organisms are highly dependent on the light intensity, comparing data for culturing systems indicated that the higher the nitrate concentration, the higher the growth rate under all tested light intensities (Table 1), whereas the growth inside the traditional system was higher than the droplet cultures due to the availability of the medium. All these experiments were performed from the same inoculant over the same time period (Figure 5).

4. Conclusions

A microfluidic device was used as a low-cost, simple, and efficient solution for in vitro experiments to study the effects of different light intensities in combination with varying nitrogen availability on the growth rate of Chlorella vulgaris. The growth rates of photoautotrophic organisms are highly dependent on the light intensity. Comparing data for culturing systems indicated that the higher the nitrate concentration, the higher the growth rate under all tested light intensities, whereas the growth inside the conventional system was higher than the droplet cultures due to the availability of the medium. Based on the experimental evidence presented in this work, the most optimum favorable culturing conditions for Chlorella vulgaris growth within the microfluidic channels were 17.6 mM and 80 µmol/m2/s. We anticipate that the presented methodology can be extended for short-term in vitro experiments to examine multiple conditions under a variety of parameters to accelerate the strain selection process.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/9/7/276/s1, Figure S1: Relationship between light over time represented from the data (A), and relation between uniform area (cm2) and light intensity (µmol/m2/s) (B). Where, (C) Relationship between light over time represented from Northern Illinois University data. http://www.vernier.com/innovate/inverse-square-law-light-experiment-mproved/. The consistency of light intensity over time was cleared. The lamp started with its highest power at zero time then its power was decreased until reached constant after 30 min. Presented resulted agreed with Richard Borne results. He suggested an improvement to the Inverse Square Law Light Experiment using our Optics Expansion Kit; his suggestion is to turn on the LED light sources for a half hour or more before starting data collection because the intensity of white LED lamp decreases somewhat over time when it is first turned on (http://www.vernier.com/innovate/inverse-square-law-light-experiment-improved/).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.G.S. and H.M.S.; methodology and analysis: M.G.S.; genetic identification: D.N.; writing—original draft preparation: M.G.S. and H.M.S.; writing—review and editing: M.G.S., N.S.D., M.S.K., M.S.Z., L.M., M.E.-B., D.N. and H.M.S.

Funding

This research was supported by the Egyptian Cultural affairs as a part of collaborated research done at Texas A&M University.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Prof. Arum Han and Hyun Soo Kim for facilitating performing on-chip cultures. At the time of submission, N.S.D. is currently with Aromatic Plant Research Center, Lehi, UT, USA. M.S.K. is currently with University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kellam, S.J.; Walker, J.M. Antibacterial activity from marine microalgae in laboratory culture. Br. Phycol. J. 1989, 24, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maadane, A.; Merghoub, N.; El Mernissi, N.; Ainane, T.; Amzazi, S. Antimicrobial activity of marine microalgae isolated from moroccan coastlines. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2017, 6, 1257–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Burkholder, P.R.; Burkholder, L.M.; Almodovar, L.R. Antibiotic activity of some marine algae of Puerto Rico. Bot. Mar. 1960, 2, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Demirbas, A. Use of algae as biofuel sources. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51, 2738–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saad, M.G.; Dosoky, N.S.; Zoromba, M.S.; Shafik, H.M. Algal Biofuels: Current Status and Key Challenges. Energies 2019, 12, 1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Raheem, A.; Prinsen, P.; Vuppaladadiyam, A.K.; Zhao, M.; Luque, R. A review on sustainable microalgae based biofuel and bioenergy production: Recent developments. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 42–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Priyadarshani, I.; Rath, B. Commercial and industrial applications of micro algae–A review. J. Algal Biomass Utln. 2012, 3, 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schnurr, P.J.; Allen, D.G. Factors affecting algae biofilm growth and lipid production: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wahidin, S.; Idris, A.; Shaleh, S.R.M. The influence of light intensity and photoperiod on the growth and lipid content of microalgae Nannochloropsis sp. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 129, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lv, J.M.; Cheng, L.H.; Xu, X.H.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.L. Enhanced lipid production of Chlorella vulgaris by adjustment of cultivation conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6797–6804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grima, E.M.; Belarbi, E.H.; Fernández, F.A.; Medina, A.R.; Chisti, Y. Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: Process options and economics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2003, 20, 491–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deenu, A.; Naruenartwongsakul, S.; Kim, S.M. Optimization and economic evaluation of ultrasound extraction of lutein from Chlorella vulgaris. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2013, 18, 1151–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pratt, R.; Daniels, T.C.; Eiler, J.J.; Gunnison, J.B.; Kumler, W.D.; Oneto, J.F.; Strait, L.A.; Spoehr, H.A.; Hardin, G.J.; Milner, H.W.; et al. Chlorellin, an antibacterial substance from Chlorella. Science 1944, 351–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.S.; Shin, C.S.; Park, S.C.; Kim, S.W. Effects of NO and SO2 on growth of highly-CO2,-tolerant microalgae. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 10, 338–343. [Google Scholar]
  15. Converti, A.; Casazza, A.A.; Ortiz, E.Y.; Perego, P.; Borghi, M. Del Effect of temperature and nitrogen concentration on the growth and lipid content of Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Chem. Eng. Process. 2009, 48, 1146–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mayo, A.W. Effects of temperature and pH on the kinetic growth of unialga Chlorella vulgaris cultures containing bacteria. Water Environ. Res. 1997, 69, 6472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Szita, N.; Boccazzi, P.; Zhang, Z.; Boyle, P.; Sinskey, A.J.; Jensen, K.F. Development of a multiplexed microbioreactor system for high-throughput bioprocessing. Lab Chip 2005, 5, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sung, Y.J.; Kim, J.Y.H.; Choi, H.I.; Kwak, H.S.; Sim, S.J. Magnetophoretic sorting of microdroplets with different microalgal cell densities for rapid isolation of fast-growing strains. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deng, Y.L.; Kuo, M.Y.; Juang, Y.J. Development of flow through dielectrophoresis microfluidic chips for biofuel production: Sorting and detection of microalgae with different lipid contents. Biomicrofluidics 2014, 8, 064120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kwak, H.S.; Kim, J.Y.; Na, S.C.; Jeon, N.L.; Sim, S.J. Multiplex microfluidic system integrating sequential operations of microalgal lipid production. Analyst 2016, 141, 1218–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, D.H.; Bae, C.Y.; Han, J.I.; Park, J.K. In situ analysis of heterogeneity in the lipid content of single green microalgae in alginate hydrogel microcapsules. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 8749–8756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bodénès, P.; Wang, H.Y.; Lee, T.H.; Chen, H.Y.; Wang, C.Y. Biotechnology for Biofuels Microfluidic techniques for enhancing biofuel and biorefinery industry based on microalgae. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zheng, G.X.; Li, Y.J.; Qi, L.L.; Liu, X.M.; Wang, H.; Yu, S.P.; Wang, Y.H. Marine phytoplankton motility sensor integrated into a microfluidic chip for high-throughput pollutant toxicity assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 84, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rhituparna Payel, P. Lab on a Chip systems for environmental analysis. Master’s Thesis, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang, Y.T.; Wang, C. Review of microfluidic photobioreactor technology for metabolic engineering and synthetic biology of cyanobacteria and microalgae. Micromachines 2016, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Abgrall, P.; Gue, A.-M. lab-on-chip technologies: Making a microfluidic network and coupling it into a complete microsystem—A review. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2007, 17, R15–R49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. BG-11 Medium. Available online: https://utex.org/products/bg-11-medium (accessed on 6 March 2019).
  28. Fawley, M.W.; Fawley, K.P.; Buchheim, M.A. Molecular diversity among communities of freshwater microchlorophytes. Microb. Ecol. 2004, 48, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Del Campo, E.M.; del Hoyo, A.; Royo, C.; Casano, L.M.; Álvarez, R.; Barreno, E. A single primer pair gives a specific ortholog amplicon in a wide range of Cyanobacteria and plastid-bearing organisms: Applicability in inventory of reference material from collections and phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 57, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, H.S.; Waqued, S.C.; Nodurft, D.T.; Devarenne, T.P.; Yakovlev, V.V.; Han, A. Raman spectroscopy compatible PDMS droplet microfluidic culture and analysis platform towards on-chip lipidomics. Analyst 2017, 142, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abràmoff, M.D.; Magalhães, P.J.; Ram, S.J. Image processing with Image J. Biophotonics Int. 2004, 11, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  32. Issarapayup, K.; Powtongsook, S.; Pavasant, P. Flat panel airlift photobioreactors for cultivation of vegetative cells of microalga Haematococcus pluvialis. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 142, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Absher, M. Hemocytometer counting. In Tissue Culture: Methods and Applications; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1973; pp. 395–397. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wheeler, P.A.; Kokkinakis, S.A. Ammonium recycling limits nitrate use in the oceanic subarctic Pacific. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1990, 35, 1267–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shafik, H.M.; Saad, M.G.; El-Serehy, H.A. Impact of nitrogen regime on fatty acid profiles of Desmodesmus quadricaudatus and Chlorella sp. and ability to produce biofuel. Acta Bot. Hung. 2015, 57, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ogbonna, J.C.; Masui, H.; Tanaka, H. Sequential heterotrophic/autotrophic cultivation - An efficient method of producing Chlorella biomass for health food and animal feed. J. Appl. Phycol. 1997, 9, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yun, Y.S.; Park, J.M. Attenuation of monochromatic and polychromatic lights in Chlorella vulgaris suspensions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 55, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cepak, V.; Pribyl, P.; Vitova, M. The effect of light color on the nucleocytoplasmic and chloroplast cycle of the green chlorococcal alga Scenedesmus obliquus. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 2006, 51, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nguyen, B.; Graham, P.J.; Sinton, D. Dual gradients of light intensity and nutrient concentration for full-factorial mapping of photosynthetic productivity. Lab Chip 2016, 16, 2785–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Van Wagenen, J.; Miller, T.W.; Hobbs, S.; Hook, P.; Crowe, B.; Huesemann, M. Effects of light and temperature on fatty acid production in Nannochloropsis salina. Energies 2012, 5, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kautsky, H.; Hirsch, A. Neue versuche zur kohlensäureassimilation. Naturwissenschaften 1931, 19, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Erickson, R.A.; Jimenez, R. Microfluidic cytometer for high-throughput measurement of photosynthetic characteristics and lipid accumulation in individual algal cells. Lab Chip 2013, 13, 2893–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Daliry, S.; Hallajsani, A.; Mohammadi Roshandeh, J.; Nouri, H.; Golzary, A. Investigation of optimal condition for Chlorella vulgaris microalgae growth. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2017, 3, 217–230. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, Z.Y.; Wang, G.C.; Zhou, B.C. Effect of iron on growth and lipid accumulation in Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4717–4722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Scarsella, M.; Belotti, G.; De Filippis, P.; Bravi, M. Study on the optimal growing conditions of Chlorella vulgaris in bubble column photobioreactors. Chem. Eng. 2010, 20, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  46. Jeanfils, J.; Canisius, M.F.; Burlion, N. Effect of high nitrate concentrations on growth and nitrate uptake by free-living and immobilized Chlorella vulgaris cells. J. Appl. Phycol. 1993, 5, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, H.S.; Weiss, T.L.; Thapa, H.R.; Devarenne, T.P.; Han, A. A microfluidic photobioreactor array demonstrating high-throughput screening for microalgal oil production. Lab Chip 2014, 14, 1415–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dewan, A.; Kim, J.; McLean, R.H.; Vanapalli, S.A.; Karim, M.N. Growth kinetics of microalgae in microfluidic static droplet arrays. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 2987–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sung, Y.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Bong, K.W.; Sim, S.J. Microdroplet photobioreactor for the photoautotrophic culture of microalgal cells. Analyst 2016, 141, 989–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kim, Y.; Jeong, S.N.; Kim, B.; Kim, D.P.; Cho, Y.K. Rapid and automated quantification of microalgal lipids on a spinning disc. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 7865–7871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kuntanawat, P.; Ruenin, J.; Phatthanakun, R.; Kunhorm, P.; Surareungchai, W.; Sukprasong, S.; Chomnawang, N. An electrostatic microwell–based biochip for phytoplanktonic cell trapping. Biomicrofluidics 2014, 8, 034108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pan, J.; Stephenson, A.L.; Kazamia, E.; Huck, W.T.; Dennis, J.S.; Smith, A.G.; Abell, C. Quantitative tracking of the growth of individual algal cells in microdroplet compartments. Integr. Biol. 2011, 3, 1043–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Perin, G.; Cimetta, E.; Monetti, F.; Morosinotto, T.; Bezzo, F. Novel micro-photobioreactor design and monitoring method for assessing microalgae response to light intensity. Algal Res. 2016, 19, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 09 00276 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the microfluidic device design. The design is based on creating separated channels parallel to each other. Each of these channels can be loaded with a different solution.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the microfluidic device design. The design is based on creating separated channels parallel to each other. Each of these channels can be loaded with a different solution.
Biomolecules 09 00276 g001
Biomolecules 09 00276 g002 550
Figure 2. The 23S rRNA gene of Chlorella vulgaris sequences in the NCBI using GeneDoc. The isolated strain was identified as Chlorella vulgaris according to the morphological characterization and molecular methods. The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) result of the amplified sequence with other Chlorella strains in The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) showed 98% sequence similarity to the 23S small subunit rRNA of Chlorella species.
Figure 2. The 23S rRNA gene of Chlorella vulgaris sequences in the NCBI using GeneDoc. The isolated strain was identified as Chlorella vulgaris according to the morphological characterization and molecular methods. The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) result of the amplified sequence with other Chlorella strains in The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) showed 98% sequence similarity to the 23S small subunit rRNA of Chlorella species.
Biomolecules 09 00276 g002
Biomolecules 09 00276 g003 550
Figure 3. Droplet-based microfluidic technique. Growth kinetics as cell number (count/droplets) for C. vulgaris cells suspended in BG11 medium with different nitrate concentrations (4.4, 8.8, and 17.6 mM) inside 270 µm droplets for 3 days at 20 °C and different light intensities (20, 80, and 200 µmol/m2/s). Standard deviation was applied (n = 10).
Figure 3. Droplet-based microfluidic technique. Growth kinetics as cell number (count/droplets) for C. vulgaris cells suspended in BG11 medium with different nitrate concentrations (4.4, 8.8, and 17.6 mM) inside 270 µm droplets for 3 days at 20 °C and different light intensities (20, 80, and 200 µmol/m2/s). Standard deviation was applied (n = 10).
Biomolecules 09 00276 g003
Biomolecules 09 00276 g004 550
Figure 4. Traditional culture results. Growth kinetics as cell number (count / droplets) for C. vulgaris cells suspended in BG11 medium with different nitrate concentrations (4.4, 8.8, and 17.6 mM) for 3three days at 20 °C and different light intensities (20, 80, and 200 µmol/m2/s). Standard deviation was applied (n = 2).
Figure 4. Traditional culture results. Growth kinetics as cell number (count / droplets) for C. vulgaris cells suspended in BG11 medium with different nitrate concentrations (4.4, 8.8, and 17.6 mM) for 3three days at 20 °C and different light intensities (20, 80, and 200 µmol/m2/s). Standard deviation was applied (n = 2).
Biomolecules 09 00276 g004
Biomolecules 09 00276 g005 550
Figure 5. Chlorella vulgaris is a unicellular eukaryotic alga, spherical-shaped with a diameter of 3.32 ± 0.99 µm. It has a single cup-shaped chloroplast. (a) Bright field image of C. vulgaris. (b) Time-lapse images of Chlorella vulgaris cells inside the microfluidic chambers at time T = 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after inoculation to show growth at 20 °C, 20 µmol/m2/s, and different nitrate concentrations (4.4, 8.8, and 17.6 mM). All these experiments were performed from the same inoculant over the same time period.
Figure 5. Chlorella vulgaris is a unicellular eukaryotic alga, spherical-shaped with a diameter of 3.32 ± 0.99 µm. It has a single cup-shaped chloroplast. (a) Bright field image of C. vulgaris. (b) Time-lapse images of Chlorella vulgaris cells inside the microfluidic chambers at time T = 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after inoculation to show growth at 20 °C, 20 µmol/m2/s, and different nitrate concentrations (4.4, 8.8, and 17.6 mM). All these experiments were performed from the same inoculant over the same time period.
Biomolecules 09 00276 g005
Table
Table 1. Maximum growth rates (h−1) for C. vulgaris cells cultured in BG11 medium with different nitrate concentrations of 4.4, 8.8, and 17.6 mM for three days at 20 °C and different light intensities of 20, 80, and 200 µmol/m2/s using traditional batch cultures and a microfluidic device.
Table 1. Maximum growth rates (h−1) for C. vulgaris cells cultured in BG11 medium with different nitrate concentrations of 4.4, 8.8, and 17.6 mM for three days at 20 °C and different light intensities of 20, 80, and 200 µmol/m2/s using traditional batch cultures and a microfluidic device.
Light Intensity (µmol/m2/s)Nitrogen Condition (mM)Max. Growth Rate (per h)
Microfluidic Culture (mean/SD)Traditional Batch Culture (×104) (mean/SD)
204.40.10 ± 0.010.06 ± 0.002
8.80.08 ± 00.12 ± 0.02
17.60.05 ± 0.010.12 ± 0.006
804.40.10 ± 0.010.09 ± 0
8.80.07 ± 0.040.05 ± 0.015
17.60.27 ± 0.050.11 ± 0.009
2004.40.06 ± 0.0030.06 ± 0
8.80.06 ± 0.010.05 ± 0.007
17.60.17 ± 0.010.09 ± 0.01

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saad, M.G.; Dosoky, N.S.; Khan, M.S.; Zoromba, M.S.; Mekki, L.; El-Bana, M.; Nobles, D.; Shafik, H.M. High-Throughput Screening of Chlorella Vulgaris Growth Kinetics inside a Droplet-Based Microfluidic Device under Irradiance and Nitrate Stress Conditions. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9070276

AMA Style

Saad MG, Dosoky NS, Khan MS, Zoromba MS, Mekki L, El-Bana M, Nobles D, Shafik HM. High-Throughput Screening of Chlorella Vulgaris Growth Kinetics inside a Droplet-Based Microfluidic Device under Irradiance and Nitrate Stress Conditions. Biomolecules. 2019; 9(7):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9070276

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saad, Marwa Gamal, Noura Sayed Dosoky, Muhammad Shuja Khan, Mohamed Shafick Zoromba, Laila Mekki, Magdy El-Bana, David Nobles, and Hesham Mohamed Shafik. 2019. "High-Throughput Screening of Chlorella Vulgaris Growth Kinetics inside a Droplet-Based Microfluidic Device under Irradiance and Nitrate Stress Conditions" Biomolecules 9, no. 7: 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9070276

APA Style

Saad, M. G., Dosoky, N. S., Khan, M. S., Zoromba, M. S., Mekki, L., El-Bana, M., Nobles, D., & Shafik, H. M. (2019). High-Throughput Screening of Chlorella Vulgaris Growth Kinetics inside a Droplet-Based Microfluidic Device under Irradiance and Nitrate Stress Conditions. Biomolecules, 9(7), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9070276

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop