Next Article in Journal
Essential Oil from Zingiber ottensii Induces Human Cervical Cancer Cell Apoptosis and Inhibits MAPK and PI3K/AKT Signaling Cascades
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Antidiabetic and Antihyperlipidemic Activity of Spondias purpurea Seeds in a Diabetic Zebrafish Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Profiling Volatile Terpenoids from Calabrian Pine Stands Infested by the Pine Processionary Moth
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Secondary Metabolites and Eco-Friendly Techniques for Agricultural Weed/Pest Management

by
Fabrizio Araniti
1,*,
Marco Landi
2,
Vito Armando Laudicina
3 and
Maria Rosa Abenavoli
4
1
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali—Produzione, Territorio, Agroenergia, Università Statale di Milano, Via Celoria n°2, 20133 Milano, Italy
2
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
4
Dipartimento Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito SNC, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(7), 1418; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071418
Submission received: 28 June 2021 / Revised: 4 July 2021 / Accepted: 9 July 2021 / Published: 12 July 2021
In agro-ecosystems, pests (insects, weeds, and other plant’s parasites) compete with crops for edaphic resources, negatively affecting quality and crop yields [1]. Nowadays, synthetic pesticides, easy to apply and accessible to farmers, are the most common and effective methods for pest management [2]. Nevertheless, the negative impact of these chemicals on the environment, human health, and the development of herbicides/pesticides-resistance are shifting the attention to alternative pest control technologies based on natural compounds [3,4,5,6]. Therefore, new eco-friendly agronomic techniques and the use of natural or natural-like molecules might represent a valid alternative strategy for pest control in the framework of sustainable agriculture [7,8,9].
The Special Issue “Secondary metabolites and eco-friendly techniques for agricultural weed/pest management” is timely and could offer interesting contributions to readers on the most recent aspects related to this pivotal topic. It includes 12 research papers (11 original articles and a scientific review) in which different aspects of pest management, from basic research to potential practical approaches, have been investigated through the latest and innovative technologies.
Three of the twelve published manuscripts are focused on the potential use of the essential oils (EOs) formulations for weed management [10,11,12].
Jouini et al. [10] deeply explored the phytotoxic effects of Thymbra capitata (L.) Cav., Mentha × piperita L. and Santolina chamaecyparissus L. EOs on several noxious weeds. Moreover, the authors investigated the effects of EOs distribution on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen balance, microbial respiration, and microbial groups speciation. They concluded that T. capitata EOs was the most effective against all the selected weeds, whereas P. oleracea resulted the most resistant weed. Moreover, except for the EOs extracted from T. capitata, which did not allow soil microorganisms to recover their initial functionality, the other EOs initially inhibited soil microorganism development. However, after a brief period, the soil microbiota recovered its initial function and biomass. Thus, the authors concluded that EOs could be an excellent alternative to synthetic herbicides for weed management, but their optimal application doses must be carefully identified to control weeds without affecting soil microorganisms.
Similarly, Abd-ElGawad et al. [12] bioassayed in vitro the EOs extracted from Argemone ochroleuca Sweet, mainly constituted by oxygenated terpenoids, on noxious weed Peganum harmala. Their results confirmed the hypothesis that oxygenated monoterpenes were more phytotoxic than non-oxygenated ones [13]. Finally, Synowiec and Krajewska [11] demonstrated that maltodextrin microencapsulated peppermint oil mixed with silty clay loam soil substrate strongly inhibited the growth of wild mustard, suggesting that the microencapsulation could be an excellent strategy to formulate new bio-herbicides.
Among the published manuscripts, two focused on the mode of action of two natural compounds, nerolidol and norharmane, belonging to the terpenoid and indole alkaloids classes, respectively [14,15].
The sesquiterpenoid nerolidol was assayed in vitro on the model species Arabidopsis thaliana, and its mode of action was studied in depth through a metabolomic approach. The results highlighted that metabolomic-scale changes induced by nerolidol (in sugar, amino acid, carboxylic acid profiles and hormonal profile) supported the multi-target action of this molecule, which is a positive feature for a bio-herbicide [14]. Similarly, the experiments on norharmane investigated the specificity of this molecule on several crops and weeds (monocots and dicots). Moreover, the authors deeply evaluated its phytotoxicity on Arabidopsis adult plants using two different application modes (leaf spraying and watering). They finally demonstrated that norharmane differentially affected weed germination and growth (some species were more sensitive during germination and less during the growth and vice-versa). In contrast, on Arabidopsis, watering was the most effective way for norharmane application inducing water stress and compromising the photosynthetic machinery [15]
One of the main strategies for discovering new molecules with phytotoxic potential is classical extraction techniques such as maceration, distillation, and decoction, followed by a bio-guided fractionation and chemical characterization of the putative phytotoxic compounds. Nomura et al. [16] screened the 50 Chinese medicinal plants and their different organs, discovering that the fruits of Illicium verum Hook. f. (star anise) were the most phytotoxic and identified the shikimic acid (about 7% of star anise dry weight) as the main phytotoxic compound.
Similarly, Kapoor et al. [17] demonstrated that the aqueous extract of Artemisia absinthium and Psidium guajava significantly affected the noxious weed Parthenium hysterophorus inhibiting its germination and root growth, inducing lipid peroxidation and affecting seedling ROS scavenging activity.
One of the main problems in studying plant extracts as potential bio-herbicide is their impact on the environment because of the wide use of organic solvents such as methanol, chloroform, hexane etc., which are not healthy and environmentally safe. Therefore, in the last years, it has mainly been explored the potential use of green techniques to achieve biologically active extracts.
In this contest, Jiang et al. [18] used the supercritical CO2 extraction technique to extract the volatile fraction of Baeckea frutescens. They bioassayed the fumigant ability of this extract on Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Pseudopestalotiopsis, two of the most important Camellia sinensis L. pathogenic fungi. Finally, they identified β-caryophyllene, α-caryophyllene, δ-cadinene and eucalyptol as the main compounds of the volatile extract.
Concerning the use of natural products to protect plants from parasitic fungi, Chàvez-Airas et al. [19] evaluated, on cape gooseberry, the elicitor effects of jasmonic acid, brassinosteroids, salicylic acid and a commercial resistance elicitor based on botanical extracts against Fusarium oxysporum disease. The results highlighted that all the treatments decreased the disease spread, reducing its severity index. Moreover, the treatments favoured stomatal conductance, water potential, biomass production and improved the photosynthetic performances of treated plants, compared to non-treated infected counterparts.
Among the techniques used for eco-friendly weed management, site-specific herbicide distribution should be mentioned. This technique aims to distinguish, through a stereo vision system, crops from weeds to allow a selective herbicide application and site-specific weed management. Dadashzadeh et al. [20] applied this technique in a densely cultivated rice field using artificial neural networks and two metaheuristic algorithms [particle swarm optimization and the bee algorithm] to optimize the neural network’s performance in selecting the most compelling features and classification. Their results proved that their algorithms were extremely sensitive and this technique, once developed, could powerfully help in minimizing the use of synthetic herbicides on crops.
The final original article was focused on the chemical profiling of volatiles released from pine stands infested by the pine processionary moth [21]. The work aimed to understand the variations induced by the infestations and identify those metabolites with a protective activity. The results could be beneficial for producing natural formulations with repellent activities against this widespread pine pest.
The last manuscript published on the special issue was a literature survey on Thricoderma sp. [22], which received in less than one year more than thirty citations in peer-reviewed manuscripts. The authors in this review focused on the plant-Trichoderma-pathogen triangle, highlighting the cost-effective and eco-friendly biocontrol activity of this fungus. In particular, the review summarizes the biological control activity exerted by Trichoderma spp., highlighting the recent progress in determining the ecological significance of Trichoderma at both molecular and biochemical levels. Finally, the authors highlighted the benefits of the symbiosis to the plant host concerning biochemical and physiological mechanisms.
The Special Issue’s editors are grateful to all the authors who contributed to the issue with their priceless contribution, as well as MDPI’s collaborators for their valuable support.

Author Contributions

All the authors equally contributed. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fried, G.; Chauvel, B.; Reynaud, P.; Sache, I. Decreases in crop production by non-native weeds, pests, and pathogens. In Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 83–101. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hedlund, J.; Longo, S.B.; York, R. Agriculture, pesticide use, and economic development: A global examination (1990–2014). Rural Sociol. 2020, 85, 519–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Araniti, F.; Bruno, L.; Sunseri, F.; Pacenza, M.; Forgione, I.; Bitonti, M.B.; Abenavoli, M.R. The allelochemical farnesene affects Arabidopsis thaliana root meristem altering auxin distribution. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 121, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Araniti, F.; Sunseri, F.; Abenavoli, M.R. Phytotoxic activity and phytochemical characterization of Lotus ornithopodioides L., a spontaneous species of Mediterranean area. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 8, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Graña, E.; Sotelo, T.; Díaz-Tielas, C.; Araniti, F.; Krasuska, U.; Bogatek, R.; Reigosa, M.J.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M. Citral induces auxin and ethylene-mediated malformations and arrests cell division in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. López-González, D.; Costas-Gil, A.; Reigosa, M.J.; Araniti, F.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M. A natural indole alkaloid, norharmane, affects PIN expression patterns and compromises root growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 151, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Damalas, C.A.; Koutroubas, S.D. Botanical pesticides for eco-friendly pest management: Drawbacks and limitations. Pestic. Crop Prod. Physiol. Biochem. Action 2020, 2020, 181–193. [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh, R.K.; Dwivedi, B.; Singh, A.; Tripathy, S. Farmers’ knowledge and creativity in eco-friendly pest management: Lessons in sustainable agriculture. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2014, 13, 574–581. [Google Scholar]
  9. Aneja, K.; Khan, S.; Aneja, A. Biopesticides an eco-friendly pestmanagement approach in agriculture: Status and prospects. Kavaka 2016, 47, 145–154. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jouini, A.; Verdeguer, M.; Pinton, S.; Araniti, F.; Palazzolo, E.; Badalucco, L.; Laudicina, V.A. Potential effects of essential oils extracted from Mediterranean aromatic plants on target weeds and soil microorganisms. Plants 2020, 9, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Synowiec, A.; Krajewska, A. Soil or vermiculite-applied microencapsulated peppermint oil effects on white mustard initial growth and performance. Plants 2020, 9, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Abd-ElGawad, A.M.; El Gendy, A.E.-N.G.; Assaeed, A.M.; Al-Rowaily, S.L.; Omer, E.A.; Dar, B.A.; Al-Taisan, W.A.A.; Elshamy, A.I. Essential oil enriched with oxygenated constituents from invasive plant Argemone ochroleuca exhibited potent phytotoxic effects. Plants 2020, 9, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Verdeguer, M.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M.; Araniti, F. Phytotoxic effects and mechanism of action of essential oils and terpenoids. Plants 2020, 9, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Landi, M.; Misra, B.B.; Muto, A.; Bruno, L.; Araniti, F. Phytotoxicity, morphological, and metabolic effects of the sesquiterpenoid nerolidol on Arabidopsis thaliana seedling roots. Plants 2020, 9, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. López-González, D.; Ledo, D.; Cabeiras-Freijanes, L.; Verdeguer, M.; Reigosa, M.J.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M. Phytotoxic activity of the natural compound norharmane on crops, weeds and model plants. Plants 2020, 9, 1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nomura, Y.; Appiah, K.S.; Fujii, Y. Evaluation of allelopathic activity of chinese medicinal plants and identification of shikimic acid as an allelochemical from Illicium verum Hook. f. Plants 2020, 9, 684. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kapoor, D.; Tiwari, A.; Sehgal, A.; Landi, M.; Brestic, M.; Sharma, A. Exploiting the allelopathic potential of aqueous leaf extracts of Artemisia absinthium and Psidium guajava against Parthenium hysterophorus, a widespread weed in India. Plants 2019, 8, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Jiang, H.; Zhang, M.; Qin, L.; Wang, D.; Yu, F.; Liang, W.; Song, C.; Granato, D. Chemical composition of a supercritical fluid (Sfe-CO2) extract from Baeckea frutescens L. leaves and its bioactivity against two pathogenic fungi isolated from the tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). Plants 2020, 9, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chávez-Arias, C.C.; Gómez-Caro, S.; Restrepo-Díaz, H. Physiological responses to the foliar application of synthetic resistance elicitors in cape gooseberry seedlings infected with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. physali. Plants 2020, 9, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dadashzadeh, M.; Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y.; Mesri-Gundoshmian, T.; Sabzi, S.; Hernández-Hernández, J.L.; Hernández-Hernández, M.; Arribas, J.I. Weed classification for site-specific weed management using an automated stereo computer-vision machine-learning system in rice fields. Plants 2020, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Foti, V.; Araniti, F.; Manti, F.; Alicandri, E.; Giuffrè, A.M.; Bonsignore, C.P.; Castiglione, E.; Sorgonà, A.; Covino, S.; Paolacci, A.R. Profiling Volatile Terpenoids from calabrian pine stands infested by the pine processionary moth. Plants 2020, 9, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sood, M.; Kapoor, D.; Kumar, V.; Sheteiwy, M.S.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Landi, M.; Araniti, F.; Sharma, A. Trichoderma: The “secrets” of a multitalented biocontrol agent. Plants 2020, 9, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Araniti, F.; Landi, M.; Laudicina, V.A.; Abenavoli, M.R. Secondary Metabolites and Eco-Friendly Techniques for Agricultural Weed/Pest Management. Plants 2021, 10, 1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071418

AMA Style

Araniti F, Landi M, Laudicina VA, Abenavoli MR. Secondary Metabolites and Eco-Friendly Techniques for Agricultural Weed/Pest Management. Plants. 2021; 10(7):1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Araniti, Fabrizio, Marco Landi, Vito Armando Laudicina, and Maria Rosa Abenavoli. 2021. "Secondary Metabolites and Eco-Friendly Techniques for Agricultural Weed/Pest Management" Plants 10, no. 7: 1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10071418

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop