Next Article in Journal
Computation Screening of Multi-Target Antidiabetic Properties of Phytochemicals in Common Edible Mediterranean Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
Utilization of Spectral Indices for High-Throughput Phenotyping
Previous Article in Journal
An Effective Method of Ribes spp. Inoculation with Blackcurrant Reversion Virus under In Vitro Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainability Trait Modeling of Field-Grown Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) Using UAV-Based Imagery
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Optimal Deployment of WSN Nodes for Crop Monitoring Based on Geostatistical Interpolations

Plants 2022, 11(13), 1636; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131636
by Edgar Andres Gutierrez 1,2, Ivan Fernando Mondragon 1,*, Julian D. Colorado 1,* and Diego Mendez Ch 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Plants 2022, 11(13), 1636; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131636
Submission received: 26 April 2022 / Revised: 7 June 2022 / Accepted: 16 June 2022 / Published: 21 June 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper, the authors proposed an optimal approach forWSN deployment by using the kriging interpolation technique. After the experiments with 289 sensors, they concluded that 25 sensors are good enough, which is very interested for me. Overall, this paper is well written, here are two minor suggestions:

1. All the equations are part of the paragraph, therefore, I would recommend adding a comma at the end of each equation.

2. Line 204, for "R2", "2" should be superscript.

 

Author Response

Thank you for your comments. Attached is the PDF file with the response to your comments and suggestions.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In the manuscript titled “Optimal deployment of WSN nodes for crop monitoring based on geostatistical interpolations”, the authors reported an interesting and valuable study. And this study could provide some implications for others researchers. However, there are some major drawbacks in the study which need to be addressed before the manuscript could be consider publication on Plants. Based on these I would like to suggest reconsider after major revision. The detailed comments are as follow:

1. Abstract needs to be supplemented with research background and conclusions.

2. I suggest adding kriging interpolation to keywords.

3. The significance of predicting soil moisture should be described in the introduction.

4. The introduction lacks a description of the shortcomings of previous studies.

5. The expressions of previous research progress require revision. For example, in line 30, Fan et al developed a hydrological agricultural system based on kriging technology driven WSN operation.

6. I advise that Table 1 shows the skewness and kurtosis of the samples.

7. The font size of Figure11-16 could be larger.

 

8. I propose to provide a legend for the three line segments in Figure 19.

Author Response

Thank you for your comments. Attached is the PDF file with the response to your comments and suggestions.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop