Next Article in Journal
Multilocus Data Analysis Reveal the Diversity of Cryptic Species in the Tillandsia ionantha (Bromeliaceae: Tillansiodeae) Complex
Next Article in Special Issue
Nematicidal Screening of Aqueous Extracts from Plants of the Yucatan Peninsula and Ecotoxicity
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Light Intensity on the Growth and Antioxidant Activity of Sweet Basil and Lettuce
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biopesticide Activity of Guayule Resin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Ethanolic Powdered Extract of Magnolia tamaulipana Vazquez against Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae)

by
Francisco Reyes-Zepeda
1,
Rapucel Tonantzin Quetzalli Heinz-Castro
2,
Fabian Eliseo Olazaran-Santibañez
1,
Salvador Ordaz-Silva
3,
José Guadalupe Pedro-Méndez
3 and
Julio César Chacón-Hernández
1,*
1
Institute of Applied Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria 87019, Mexico
2
Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Soledad de Graciano Sánchez 78321, Mexico
3
Faculty of Business and Engineering San Quintín, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, San Quintín 22930, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(13), 1711; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131711
Submission received: 5 June 2022 / Revised: 24 June 2022 / Accepted: 25 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Extracts as Biological Protective Agents)

Abstract

:
Avocado bronze mite (ABM), Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) has potential for development in several plant species of agricultural importance. ABM is one of the most economically important pests in avocado cultivars, causing major damage to fruit and defoliation. At present, the control of ABM depends mainly on agrochemicals. Therefore, it is necessary to find alternatives to agrochemicals that can help minimize environmental impact and health risks for humans and mammals. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of different concentrations (5, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000 µg/mL) of ethanolic powdered extract of M. tamaulipana leaves against adult ABM females. The different concentrations of M. tamaulipana extract did not cause mortality of O. punicae. Females treated with 5 and 1000 µg/mL of the extract showed a decrease in the number of eggs laid per female at 24 (5.17 and 1.27), 48 (5.07 and 1.17), and 72 h (4.97 and 0.80), compared to the control treatment (5.20, 6.60 and 6.87), respectively, which led to a reduction in the growth rate. Percentage of feeding damage decreased with the increasing concentration of the extract. The ethanolic powdered extract of M. tamaulipana leaf has potential to control O. punicae.

1. Introduction

Avocado bronze mite (ABM), Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) is a major pest of avocado (Persea americana L.) crops in Southern California (McMurtry and Johnson 1966) and Mexico [1,2]. ABM feeds primarily on the upper leaf surface, but in high populations, this mite moves to the lower leaf surface to feed. ABM inserts its stylet into the leaf tissue, sucking out the cell contents, and the cell remnant coagulates to form a yellowish to brown necrotic mass [3]. High populations of these mites cause defoliation, leading to sunscalds in fruits and causing fruit drops due to fruit-setting abortion, providing lower yields. O. punicae is controlled through the use of agrochemicals [1]. However, ABM develops resistance to chemical insecticides very quickly, due to its short life cycle and high fecundity and fertility [1,4,5,6,7]. Therefore, research on alternatives for the management of O. punicae is required.
Plant-derived extracts are an alternative method to chemicals insecticides and, in addition, offer an ecological solution with a minimal detrimental effect on the environment, humans, and mammals [8,9,10]. Some species of Magnolia, such as M. citrata, M. dealbata, M. fargesii, M. kobus, M. schiedeana, and M. tamaulipana, have a diversity of secondary metabolite compounds with insecticidal and acaricidal properties [11,12,13,14,15,16]. M. tamaulipana trees grow in the cloud forest and are endemic to UNESCO Biosphere Reserve, El Cielo, located in Tamaulipas, Mexico [17,18]. Literature contains reports stating that M. tamaulipana leaves have several secondary metabolites such as flavonoids, tannins, sterols and terpenes, saponins, carotenoids, carbohydrates, purines, free reducing sugars, soluble starch, and quinones [19]. A few researchers have reported that M. tamaulipana has spider mite control properties. The ethanolic powdered extract from M. tamaulipana leaf has anti-oviposition activity and anti-feeding properties on Tetranychus urticae Koch [15]. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of different concentrations (5, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000 µg/mL) of ethanolic powdered extract of M. tamaulipana leaves against adult ABM females.

2. Results

2.1. Phytochemical Composition

The ethanolic extract of M. tamaulipana leaves has several groups of secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, tannins, sterols and terpenes, saponins, carotenoids, carbohydrates, purines, free reducing sugars, soluble starch, and quinones. Alkaloids did not appear in the extract (Table 1).

2.2. Oviposition

We evaluated the effect of seven concentrations of ethanolic extract of M. tamaulipana leaves against adult females of ABM. The extract did not cause mortality in the O. punicae females, but did cause a reduction in the number of laid eggs and food intake of ABM. At 24, 48, and 72 h after extract application, there was a significant effect on the egg-laying ability of ABM females (F = 44.80; df = 7, 16; p < 0.0001; F = 84.55; df = 7, 16; p < 0.0001; F = 47.13; df = 7, 16; p < 0.0001, respectively (Table 2)). At 24 h, the oviposition activity index ranged between 0.0014 (5 µ/mL) and 0.6102 (1000 µ/mL), at 48 h, it was between 0.1324 (5 µ/mL) and 0.6997 (1000 µ/mL), and at 72 h it was between 0.1564 (5 µ/mL) and 0.7993 (1000 µ/mL), as compared to the control treatment (Figure 1). The effective concentration EC50(90) of 308.16 (2982) µg/mL resulted in 50% fewer eggs laid compared to the control. The results showed that the oviposition of O. punicae females decreased as the extract concentration increased.

2.3. Feeding Damage

The damage percentage differed significantly among the treatments, at 24, 48, and 72 h (F = 12.86; df = 7, 16; p < 0.0001; F = 18.59; df = 7, 16; p < 0.0001; F = 40.08; df = 7, 16; p < 0.0001), respectively (Table 3). Feeding activity of ABM females treated with 5 to 1000 µ/mL of M. tamaulipana extract was inhibited by 0.071 to 0.587, 0.080 to 0.599, and 0.160 to 0.673 at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively, as compared to the control treatment (Figure 2). The results showed that the feeding damage of O. punicae females decreased as the extract concentration increased.
The oviposition rate and the percentage of feeding damage of O. punicae decreased as concentration rates increased (Figure 3). The regression method showed that the number of eggs per female depended on the feeding of ABM females that were treated with different concentrations of M. tamulipana extract. The values of R2 indicated that 89.22% (F = 49.67; df = 1, 6; p = 0.0004), 94.46% (F = 102.28; df = 1, 6; p = 5.4312 × 10−5) and 96.94% (F = 190.20; df = 1, 6; p = 9.0406 × 10−6) of the variation in the number of eggs laid per O. punicae female was associated with feeding damage at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. The results showed that the increase in the concentration of the extract of M. tamaulipana negatively influences the relationship between the oviposition and feeding damage of ABM females.

2.4. Demographic Parameters

The growth rate of O. punicae was significantly different among the treatments (F = 315.51; df = 7, 16; p < 0.0001) and it decreased as the concentration increased (Table 4). The highest average (±SE) of the r of O. punicae was observed in the control group (0.9929 ± 0.01) and the lowest r was in females treated with 1000 µg/mL (0.4809 ± 0.01). The number of mites added to the population per female per day (λ) was significantly greater in the control group than in mites treated with the extract (F = 367.61; df = 7, 16; p < 0.0001). The doubling time (DT) of ABM differed significantly between the treatments (F = 170.38; df = 7, 16; p < 0.0001). The average time in which the ABM population doubled was greater when females were treated with 1000 µg/mL of the extract (1.4421 ± 0.02) and less pronounced in the control group (0.6982 ± 0.00) (Table 4).

3. Discussion

As in Arredondo-Valdés et al. [19], in this work, we found that M. tamaulipana leaf ethanolic powdered extract has different secondary metabolites, including flavonoids, tannins, sterols and terpenes, saponins, carotenoids, carbohydrates, purines, free reducing sugars, soluble starch, and quinones. Secondary plant metabolites such as alkaloids, saponins, phenols, and terpenes can be useful to pest management strategies. These phytochemicals affect oviposition and intake feed, as well as retarding growth, causing chemo-sterilization, and leading to the death of several herbivorous arthropod species [20,21].
Oviposition of phytophagous arthropods over their host plants often precedes herbivory [22]. Therefore, controlling the oviposition of O. punicae female is essential because, over time, the population of the next generation of ABM is reduced. This research shows that the O. punicae inhibition rate increases in relation to higher concentrations of the M. tamaulipana extract. Our results are similar to those reported by Chacón-Hernández et al. [15]. They reported oviposition inhibition rates of T. urticae at concentrations of 5, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 µg/mL of M. tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract. The oviposition inhibition rate increased at 24 h (18.18% to 95.56%), 48 h (7.69% to 95.83%), and 72 h (11.74% to 95.39%), as compared to the control. On the other hand, the effects of other plant extracts on the tetranychids’ oviposition have been studied and those results are similar to the results of this work. Sivira et al. [23] documented that ethanolic extracts of Lippia origanoides H.B.K. (Verbenaceae) and Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunth ex Walp. (Fabaceae) reduced the oviposition of T. cinnabarinus Boisduval at 72 h (43.7% and 57.0%) at a concentration of 5% (v/v), as compared to the control. Pavela et al. [24] found that the concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 15.0, 20.0, and 30.0 g·L−1) of Saponaria officinalis L. (Caryophyllaceae) root crude extract inhibited oviposition of T. urticae females (3.1% to 94.1%), as compared to the control at 48 h. Pavela et al. [25] reported that different concentrations (25, 50, 80, 100, and 150 g cm−2) of methanolic and ethyl acetate extracts from Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A.Gray (Asteraceae) inhibited the egg-laying capacity of T. urticae, ranging between 9.8 to 62.8% and 26.9 to 100.0%, respectively, in contrast with the control. In addition, Ribeiro et al. [26] documented that ethanolic extract of Annona mucosa Jacq. (Annonaceae) seeds reduces the egg-laying activity (1.70 eggs/female) of Panonychus citri (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) at a concentration of 10,000 mg L−1 in 5 days, as compared to the control (23.29 eggs/female). The anti-oviposition of ABM could be due to presence of flavonoids in the M. tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract (Table 1). In this regard, Vásquez et al. [5] found a negative relationship between flavonoid content of grape cultivars and O. punicae oviposition. Dimetry et al. [27,28] mentioned that mites’ anti-oviposition may be due to two situations. First, secondary plant metabolites can directly influence the female ovaries. Second, by direct contact of mite’s cuticle with one or more bio-active compounds present in the botanical extract can alter the production of pheromones. On the other hand, Hosny et al. [29] mentioned that both chemical and botanical products with acaricidal properties can partially or temporarily sterilize the females, which causes a lower number of eggs laid/female/day, as well as a lower number of hatched eggs, as compared to the control group. According to the previous information, although more research is required, the ethanolic powdered extract of M. tamaulipana leaves causes anti-oviposition and can be characterized by its sterilizing effect.
Feeding damage decreased as the concentration rates increased. Similarly, Chacón-Hernández et al. [15] found that different concentrations (5, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 µg/mL) of M. tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract have anti-oviposition effects on T. urticae females. They reported an oviposition inhibition rate increase between 18.18% to 95.56%, 7.69% to 95.83%, and 11.74% to 95.39%, according to the concentration of the extract, at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. Fetoh and Al-Shammery [30] documented that the lethal concentration of 50% (LC50, 47.6, 1102, and 8433.2 ppm) of the ethanolic extracts from Cuminum cyminum (Labiaceae), Duranta plumeria (Verbenaceae) and Ambrosia maritimal (Compositae) deter feeding of Oligonychus afrasiaticus McGregor on bean plants (P. vulgaris) by 95.33% to 97.80%, 66.67% to 97.80%, and 53.33% to 93.33%, at 24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. The anti-feeding of O. punicae can be due to presence of terpenes and flavonoids in the M. tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract (Table 1). In this regard, Mierziak et al. [31] and Koul [32] mentioned that secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenes are the most potent antifeedants. Therefore, after applying the extract of M. tamaulipana directly to O. punicae females, possibly some secondary metabolite entered into contact with its gustatory and olfactory sensory systems so that its palatability was altered, reducing its food intake.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Colonia de Red Spider Mite Colony

A O. punicae colony was started with biological material obtained from the Population Ecology Laboratory, Institute of Applied Ecology, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas. To increase the avocado bronze mite population, female and male O. punicae were placed on bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Fabaceae)) under greenhouse conditions at 29 ± 4 °C and 60 ± 15% relative humidity (RH).

4.2. Preparation of the Plant Material and the Extract

Uncontaminated leaves of M. tamaulipana (i.e., without external agents and physical contaminants) were exposed to sunlight to remove their moisture [33]. The dry leaf samples were ground into a fine powder by an electric mill (Cuisinart DBM-8, Stamford, CT, USA). The powder of M. tamaulipana (150 g) was mixed with 96% ethanol (500 mL) to prepare the extract that was kept under constant stirring on Thermo Scientific™ Cimarec™ Digital Stirring Hotplates for three days at room temperature (27 °C), in amber bottles covered with aluminum [34]. Subsequently, the solution was filtered using Whatman No. 4 paper. The solvent was removed from the extract by passing it through a vacuum system on a rotary evaporator at 60 °C for two hours (Yamato Scientific America Inc., Model-RE301, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and the rest of the solvent was dried in an oven chamber (Shel-lab Model 1535, Sheldon Manufacturing Inc., Cornelius, OR, USA) for 72 h. Finally, the extract was recovered in solid form to prepare 2000 μg/mL of a stock solution for the antibacterial activity tests and the phytochemical composition analysis [15,19,34,35].

4.3. Phytochemical Extract Analysis

The ethanolic powdered extract of M. tamaulipana leaves was analyzed to conduct the phytochemical qualitative detection tests, including carbohydrates (Molisch’s test), reducing sugars (Fehling and Benedict’s tests), alkaloids (Dragendorff and Sonneschain’s tests), flavonoids (Shinoda’s test and NaOH test), cyanogenic glycosides (Gringnard’s test), saponins (foam test), sterols and terpenes (Liberman-Burchard’s test), tannins {FeCl3, K3[Fe(CN)6] and gelatine tests}, quinones (Börntraguer’s test), purins (HCl tests), polysaccharides (Lugol’s test), soluble starch (KOH and H2SO4 tests), and carotenoids (H2SO4 and FeCl3 tests) [36,37].

4.4. Experimental Design

We used the sand technique described by Ahmadi [38], with modification. Bean discs of 2.5 cm in diameter were cut and placed on water-soaked cotton, with the underside facing up. A disc was placed inside a 5 cm wide Petri dish; each disc had 10 adult ABM females with age of one day. The experiment was done under laboratory conditions at 27 ± 1 °C, 70–80% relative humidity (RH), and a photoperiod of 12:12 (light: darkness). The bean leaf discs were split at random into eight groups: a control group and seven treatment groups, one per each extract concentration. A bean leaf disc was the replicate. We had three replicates per group. Ten mite females were placed on each bean leaf disc and they were sprayed one time (0.5 ± 0.1 mL) with each concentration. We determined the spread amount of the extract with the help of a 2 mL sterile storage tube. We sprayed ten times into the storage tube to calculate the average and standard deviation of the amount sprayed. A manual sprayer (Truper® Model 14687, Ciudad Victoria, Mexico) was used to apply M. tamaulipana extract at different concentrations (5, 10, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000 µg/mL). The control treatment was sprayed with distilled water only.

4.5. Oligonychus punicae Oviposition

We counted the number of eggs at 24, 48, and 72 h with the help of a dissecting microscope (UNICO Stereo and Zoom Microscopes ZM180, Princeton, NJ, USA). The Kramer and Mulla [39] formula was used to determine the oviposition activity index (OAI) in each concentration.
OAI = [(NT − NC)/(NT + NC)]
where NC is the number of eggs in the control group and NT is the number of eggs in the treated group with the extract. The percentage values ranged between +1 and −1. The positive values indicate more eggs laid in the treatment than in the control group (showing that the extract stimulates egg-laying activity). In contrast, more eggs laid in the control group than in the treatment results in a negative OAI, indicating that the extract inhibits the egg-laying activity.

4.6. Oligonychus punicae Feeding

We registered the percentage of feeding damage at 24, 48, and 72 h with the help of a dissecting microscope (UNICO Stereo and Zoom Microscopes ZM180, Princenton, NJ, USA). The anti-feeding effect was measured through the inhibition percentage of feed intake by ABM in the bean leaf discs, as compared to the control treatment. At 24, 48, and 72 h, we classified the symptoms observed in the bean leaf discs according to an ordinal scale developed by Hussey and Parr [40] and Nachman and Zemek [41]. We converted this into percentages: 0 = 0% damage (with no feeding damage), 1 = 1–20%, 2 = 21–40%, 3 = 41–60%, 4 = 61–80%, and 5 = 81–100% of feeding damage (dense marks, or wilting, after eating all the bean disc). We used the criterion of Kramer and Mulla [39] formula to measure the females’ food intake. Positive values show that there is more damage in the treatment group than in the control group, indicating that the treatment promotes feeding. Negative values represent more severe damage to the control group than to the treatment group, indicating that feeding is inhibited in the treatment group.

4.7. Oligonychus punicae Growth Population

The rate of increase (r, day−1), the finite rate of increase (λ), and the population doubling time (DT) were used as the parameters to establish population increase of ABM, and r was calculated by [42]:
r = (1/t) × ln(Nt/N0)
where Nt is the number of individuals at time t (surviving adult females plus the eggs laid at the end of the bioassay), N0 is the number of individuals at time 0 (initial cohort = 10 adult females of O. punicae), and t is the number of days elapsed from the start to the end of the bioassay (equal to 3 days). The finite growth rate, i.e., the number of times the population multiplied in a unit of time, was calculated as:
λ = antiloge r
The doubling time was calculated by:
DT = Ln(2)/r
The demographic parameters (r, λ, and DT) indicate the population growth of the red spider mite.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

The number of laid eggs, percentage of feeding damage, rate of increase (r, day−1), finite rate of increase, and doubling time were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with mean comparison tests using Tukey’s HSD. We used a probit analysis to estimate the effective concentration [EC50(90)], including corresponding CI95 values, which caused oviposition inhibition by 50(90)% compared to the control [43]. Finally, we correlated the mean number of eggs laid per female with the average percent of feeding damage of O. punicae. The SAS/STAT software was used for all analyses [44].

5. Conclusions

The results show ethanolic powdered extract of M. tamaulipana leaves can be used in mite control. The extract reduced both feeding damage and oviposition of O. punicae, leading to lower growth rates. Further research is necessary, including the assessment of other types of M. tamaulipana extracts to control O. punicae and other species of pest mites, as well as studying the extract’s effect on natural enemies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.C.-H.; methodology; J.C.C.-H., F.R.-Z. and F.E.O.-S.; validation, J.C.C.-H. and R.T.Q.H.-C.; formal analysis, J.C.C.-H., F.R.-Z. and S.O.-S.; resources, F.R.-Z., J.G.P.-M. and J.C.C.-H.; data curation, J.C.C.-H., R.T.Q.H.-C. and S.O.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.C.-H. and F.R.-Z.; writing—review and editing, R.T.Q.H.-C. and J.G.P.-M..; visualization, F.E.O.-S. and S.O.-S.; supervision, J.C.C.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Peña, J.; Wysoki, M. Plagas en Israel, México, Estados Unidos, Centroamérica y Perú: Plagas del palto en México. In Manejo Integrado de Plagas en Paltos y Cítricos; Ripa, R., Larral, P., Eds.; Colección Libros INIA. No. 23; Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias INIA: Valparaíso, Chile, 2008; pp. 303–309. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cerna, E.; Badii, M.H.; Ochoa, Y.; Aguirre, L.A.; Landeros, J. Life table of Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Acari: Tetranychidae) inavocado leaves (Persea americana Mill) in the hass, fuerte and criollo cultivars. Univ. Cienc. 2009, 25, 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aponte, O.; McMurtry, J.A. Damage on Hass avocado leaves, webbing and nesting behavior of Oligonychus perseae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1997, 21, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Humeres, E.C.; Morse, J.G. Baseline susceptibility of persea mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) to abamectin and milbemectin in avocado groves in Southern California. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2005, 36, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vásquez, C.; Aponte, O.; Morales, J.; Sanabria, M.E.; García, G. Biological studies of Oligonychus punicae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on grapevine cultivars. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2008, 45, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Das, S.; Saren, J.; Mukhopadhyay, A. Acaricide susceptibility of Oligonychus coffeae Nietner (Acari: Tetranychidae) with corresponding changes in detoxifying enzyme levels from tea plantations of sub-Himalayan Terai, India. Acarologia 2017, 57, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ferraz, J.C.B.; Silva, P.R.R.; Amaranes, M.P.; Silva-Melo, J.W.; Lima, D.B.; França, S.M. Biology and fertility life table of Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Acari: Tetranychidae) associated with eucaliptus in a clonal minigarden. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2020, 25, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Attia, S.; Grissa, K.L.; Lognay, G.; Bitume, E.; Hance, T.; Mailleux, A.C. A review of the major biological approaches to control the worldwide pest Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) with special reference to natural pesticides. J. Pest Sci. 2013, 86, 361–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Giraldo-Rivera, A.I.; Guerrero-Álvarez, G.D. Botanical biopesticides: Research and development trends, a focus on the Annonaceae family. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hort. 2019, 13, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lengai, G.M.W.; Muthomi, J.W.; Mbga, E.R. Phytochemical activity and role of botanical pesticides in pest management for sustainable agricultural crop production. Sci. Afr. 2020, 7, e00239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Miyazawa, M.; Ishikawa, Y.; Kasahara, H.; Yamanaka, J.I.; Kameoka, H. An insect growth inhibitory ljgnan from flower buds of Magnolia fargesii. Phytochemistry 1994, 35, 611–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Park, I.K.; Park, J.D.; Kim, C.S.; Shin, S.C.; Ahn, Y.J.; Park, S.C.; Lee, S.G. Insecticidal and acaricidal activities of domestic plant extracts against five major arthropod pests. Korean J. Pestic. Sci. 2002, 6, 271–278. [Google Scholar]
  13. Flores-Estévez, N.; Vasquez-Morales, S.G.; Cano-Medina, T.; SánchezVelásquez, L.R.; Noa-Carrazana, J.C.; Diáz-Fleischer, F. Insecticidal activity of raw ethanolic extracts from Magnolia dealbata Zucc on a tephritid pest. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2013, 48, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vásquez-Morales, S.G.; Flores-Estévez, N.; Sánchez-Velásquez, L.F.; Pineda-López, M.R.; Viveros-Viveros, H.; Díaz-Fleischer, F. Bioprospecting of botanical insecticides: The case of ethanol extracts of Magnolia schiedeana Schltl. applied to a tephritid fruit fly Anastrepha ludens Loew. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2015, 3, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chacón-Hernández, J.C.; Arredondo-Valdés, R.; Anguiano-Cabello, J.C.; Ordaz-Silva, S.; Hernández-Juárez, A.; Reyes-Zepeda, F. Effect of Magnolia tamaulipana extract on egg laying and food intake of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Int. J. Acarol. 2019, 46, 108–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luu-Dam, N.A.; Tabanca, N.; Estep, A.S.; Nguyen, D.H.; Kendra, P.E. Insecticidal and attractant activities of Magnolia citrata leaf essential oil against two major pests from Diptera: Aedes aegypti (Culicidae) and Ceratitis capitata (Tephritidae). Molecules 2021, 26, 2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dieringer, G.; Cabrera, L.; Lara, M.; Loya, L.; Reyes-Castillo, P. Beetle pollination and floral thermogenicity in Magnolia tamaulipana (Magnoliaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 1999, 160, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vázquez-G., J.A. Magnolia (Magnoliaceae) in Mexico and Central America: A synopsis. Britonia 1994, 46, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arredondo-Valdés, R.; Chacón-Hernández, J.C.; Reyes-Zepeda, F.; Hernández-Castillo, F.D.; Anguiano-Cabello, J.C.; Heinz-Castro, R.T.Q.; Mora-Ravelo, S.G. In vitro antibacterial activity of Magnolia tamaulipana against tomato phytopathogenic bacteria. Plant Prot. Sci. 2020, 56, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hikal, W.M.; Baeshen, R.S.; Said-Al Ahl, H.A.H. Botanical insecticide as simple extractives for pest control. Cogent Biol. 2017, 3, 1404274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tlak Gajger, I.; Dar, S.A. Plant allelochemicals as sources of insecticides. Insects 2021, 12, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, J.; Tooker, J.F.; Luthe, D.S.; De Moraes, C.M.; Felton, G.W. Insect eggs can enhance wound response in plants: A study system of tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. and Helicoverpa zea Boddie. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sivira, A.; Sanabria, M.E.; Valera, N.; Vásquez, C. Toxicity of ethanolic extracts from Lippia origanoides and Gliricidia sepium to Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval) (Acari: Tetranychidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2010, 40, 375–379. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pavela, R.; Murugan, K.; Canale, A.; Benelli, G. Saponaria officinalis-synthesized silver nanocrystals as effective biopesticides and oviposition inhibitors against Tetranychus urticae Koch. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 97, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pavela, R.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Sut, S.; Baldan, V.; Ngahang, S.L.; Biapa, P.C.; Cappellacci, L.; Petrelli, R.; Nicoletti, M.; Canale, A.; et al. Oviposition inhibitory activity of the Mexican sunflower Tithonia diversifolia (Asteraceae) polar extracts against the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Tetranychidae). Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 101, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ribeiro, L.P.; Zanardi, O.Z.; Vendramim, J.D.; Yammoto, J.D. Comparative toxicity of an acetogenin-based extract and commercial pesticides against citrus red mite. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2014, 64, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dimetry, N.Z.; El-Gengaihi, S.; Reda, A.S.; Amer, S.A.A. Toxicity of some compounds isolated from Abrus precatorius L. seeds towards the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. Acarologia 1990, 31, 361–366. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dimetry, N.Z.; Amer, S.A.A.; El-Gengaihi, S. Toxicological evaluation and biological potency of petroleum ether extract of two plants and their isolates towards the two spotted spider mite “Tetranychus urticae” Koch. Acarologia 2003, 43, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hosny, A.H.; Keratum, A.Y.; Hasan, N.E. Comparative efficiency of pesticides and some predators to control spider mites: II Biological and behavioral characteristics of predators Stethorus gilvifrons, Amblyseius gossipi and Phytoseiulus macropili and their host two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae under some chemicals treatments. J. Plant Prot. Path. Mansoura Univ. 2010, 1, 1065–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fetoh, B.E.A.; Al-Shammery, K.A. Acaricidal ovicial and repellent activities of some plant extracts on the date palm dust mite, Oligonychus afrasiaticus Meg. (Acari: Tetranychidae). Int. J. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2011, 2, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mierziak, J.; Kostyn, K.; Kulma, A. Flavonoids as important molecules of plant interactions with the environment. Molecules 2014, 19, 16240–16265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Koul, O. Antifeedant phytochemicals in insect management. In Ecofriendly Pest Management for Food Security; Omkar, Ed.; Elsevier Inc.: London, UK, 2016; pp. 525–544. [Google Scholar]
  33. Abiodun, J.; Efe-Imafidon, A.; Benson-Oluwafemi, A.; Ajibola-Aluko, P. Efficacy of selected plant extracts in the management of tomato early blight disease caused by Alternaria solani. Asian J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 11, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moreno-Limón, S.; González-Solís, L.N.; Salcedo-Martínez, S.M.; Cárdenas-Avila, M.L.; Perales-Ramírez, A. Efecto antifúngico de extractos de gobernadora (Larrea tridentata L.) sobre la inhibición in vitro de Aspergillus flavus y Penicillium sp. Polibotánica 2011, 32, 193–205. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jasso de Rodríguez, D.; Trejo-González, F.A.; Rodríguez-García, R.; Díaz-Jiménez, M.L.V.; Sáenz-Galindo, A.; Hernández-Castillo, F.D.; Villarreal-Quintanilla, J.A.; Peña-Ramos, F.M. Antifungal activity in vitro of Rhus muelleri against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 75, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sahgal, G.; Ramanathan, S.; Sasidharan, S.; Mordi, M.N.; Ismail, S.; Mansor, S.M. Phytochemical and antimicrobial activity of Swietenia mahagoni crude methanolic seed extract. Trop. Biomed. 2009, 26, 274–279. [Google Scholar]
  37. Usman, H.; Abdulrahman, F.I.; Usman, A. Qualitative phytochemical screening and in vitro antimicrobial effects of methanol stem bark extract of Ficus thonningii (Moraceae). Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2009, 6, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ahmadi, A. Demographic toxicology as a method for studying the dicofol-twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) system. J. Econ. Entomol. 1983, 76, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kramer, W.L.; Mulla, S. Oviposition attractants and repellents of mosquitoes: Oviposition responses of Culex1 mosquitoes to organic infusions. Environ. Entomol. 1979, 8, 1111–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hussey, N.W.; Parr, W.J. The effect of glasshouse red spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) on the yield of cucumbers. J. Hortic. Sci. 1963, 38, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nachman, G.; Zemek, R. Interactions in a tritrophic acarine predator-prey metapopulation system III: Effects of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on host plant condition. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2002, 26, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Birch, L.C. The intrinsic rate of increase of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol. 1948, 17, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1971; p. 331. [Google Scholar]
  44. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT 9.1: User’s Guide; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2002; pp. 3703–3796. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Ovipositional activity index (mean ± standard error) for Oligonychus punicae in response to different concentrations of Magnolia tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract at (A) 24 h, (B) 48 h, and (C) 72 h.
Figure 1. Ovipositional activity index (mean ± standard error) for Oligonychus punicae in response to different concentrations of Magnolia tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract at (A) 24 h, (B) 48 h, and (C) 72 h.
Plants 11 01711 g001
Figure 2. Feeding activity index (mean ± standard error) for Oligonychus punicae in response to different concentrations of Magnolia tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract at (A) 24 h, (B) 48 h, and (C) 72 h.
Figure 2. Feeding activity index (mean ± standard error) for Oligonychus punicae in response to different concentrations of Magnolia tamaulipana ethanolic powdered extract at (A) 24 h, (B) 48 h, and (C) 72 h.
Plants 11 01711 g002
Figure 3. The correlation between the number of eggs laid per female and percentage of feeding damage of Oligonychus punicae treated with different concentrations of ethanolic powdered extract of Magnolia tamaulipana leaves at 24 h (A), 48 h (B), and 72 h (C).
Figure 3. The correlation between the number of eggs laid per female and percentage of feeding damage of Oligonychus punicae treated with different concentrations of ethanolic powdered extract of Magnolia tamaulipana leaves at 24 h (A), 48 h (B), and 72 h (C).
Plants 11 01711 g003
Table 1. Secondary metabolites (“+” = present; “−” = absent) in Magnolia tamaulipana leaf ethanolic powdered extract.
Table 1. Secondary metabolites (“+” = present; “−” = absent) in Magnolia tamaulipana leaf ethanolic powdered extract.
Bioactive Compound TestBioactive Compound Test
Tannins+FeCl3 (catechol)Flavonoids+Shinoda’s
+K3[Fe(CN)6] +NaOH
+GelatineSaponins+Foam
Carbohydrates+Molisch’sSterols and terpenes+Burchard’s
Carotenoids+H2SO4GlycosidesGringnard’s
+FeCl3Quinones+Börntraguer’s
CoumarinsNH4OH +H2SO4
Free reducing sugars+FehlingSoluble starch+KOH and H2SO4
Alkaloids+Benedict’s +Gelatine
DragendorffPurins+HCI
Sonneschain’sPolysaccharidesLugol’
Table 2. Effect of ethanolic powdered extract of Magnolia tamulipana leaves on oviposition of Oligonychus punicae.
Table 2. Effect of ethanolic powdered extract of Magnolia tamulipana leaves on oviposition of Oligonychus punicae.
TreatmentEggs/Female ± SE *
24 h48 h72 h
Control5.20 ± 0.51 a **6.60 ± 0.12 a6.87 ± 0.62 a
5 µg/mL5.17 ± 0.18 a5.07 ± 0.26 b4.97 ± 0.12 ab
10 µg/mL5.10 ± 0.23 a4.23 ± 0.23 bc3.97 ± 0.22 bc
50 µg/mL4.43 ± 0.23 a3.93 ± 0.22 cd3.57 ± 0.88 bc
100 µg/mL3.03 ± 0.15 b3.07 ± 0.23 de3.07 ± 0.18 cd
250 µg/mL2.50 ± 0.12 bc2.1 ± 0.31 ef2.10 ± 0.21 de
500 µg/mL1.53 ± 0.15 cd1.37 ± 0.03 f1.13 ± 0.17 e
1000 µg/mL1.27 ± 0.18 d1.17 ± 0.07f0.80 ± 0.30 e
EC50 (IC95)EC90 (IC95)b ± EEχ2
308.1629822.23 ± 0.4326.74 ***
(184.06–430.17)(1718–9240)
* Average number of eggs laid per female ± standard error (SE). ** Means (± SE) within a column and followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test). EC: Effective concentration EC50 (EC90) in µg/mL causing 50% (90%) inhibition of egg laying by Oligonychus punicae females, compared with untreated control. CI: Confidence interval at 95%. b: slope ± standard error. χ2: Chi square value. *** Level of significance p < 0.0001.
Table 3. Effects of ethanolic powdered extract of Magnolia tamaulipana leaves on Oligonychus punicae feeding damage.
Table 3. Effects of ethanolic powdered extract of Magnolia tamaulipana leaves on Oligonychus punicae feeding damage.
TreatmentPercentage of Feeding Damage ± SE *
24 h48 h72 h
Control10.00 ± 0.58 a17.33 ± 1.45 a29.00 ± 1.00 a
5 µg/mL8.67 ± 0.33 ab14.67 ± 0.33 ab21.00 ± 1.00 b
10 µg/mL8.67 ± 0.88 ab14.67 ± 1.86 ab20.00 ± 0.58 b
50 µg/mL8.00 ± 0.58 abc12.00 ± 1.53 bc19.67 ± 1.76 b
100 µg/mL7.00 ± 0.58 abc8.67 ± 0.33 cd15.33 ± 1.45 bc
250 µg/mL6.33 ± 0.67 bc7.00 ± 1.00 cd12.67 ± 1.15 cd
500 µg/mL5.00 ± 0.58 cd6.67 ± 0.33 d8.67 ± 0.88 de
1000 µg/mL2.67 ± 0.88 d4.33 ± 0.33 d5.67 ± 0.88 e
* Means ± standard error (SE) within a column and followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test).
Table 4. Effects of Magnolia tamaulipana leaf ethanolic powdered extract on the rate of increase, the finite rate of increase, and the population doubling time of Oligonychus punicae.
Table 4. Effects of Magnolia tamaulipana leaf ethanolic powdered extract on the rate of increase, the finite rate of increase, and the population doubling time of Oligonychus punicae.
TreatmentDemographic Parameters
Growth Rate *Finite Rate of GrowthDoubling Time
Control0.9929 ± 0.01 a2.6991 ± 0.01 a0.6982 ± 0.00 f
5 µg/mL0.9283 ± 0.00 b2.5303 ± 0.01 b0.7467 ± 0.00 ef
10 µg/mL0.8865 ± 0.01 bc2.4268 ± 0.02 c0.7821 ± 0.01 ef
50 µg/mL0.8532 ± 0.00 c2.3473 ± 0.01 c0.8124 ± 0.00 de
100 µg/mL0.7729 ± 0.01 d2.1662 ± 0.01 d0.8969 ± 0.01 d
250 µg/mL0.6796 ± 0.02 e1.9736 ± 0.03 e1.0212 ± 0.03 c
500 µg/mL0.5376 ± 0.02 f1.7125 ± 0.03 f1.2929 ± 0.05 b
1000 µg/mL0.4809 ± 0.01 g1.6175 ± 0.01 f1.4421 ± 0.02 a
* Means ± standard error (SE) within a column and followed by different lowercase letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reyes-Zepeda, F.; Heinz-Castro, R.T.Q.; Olazaran-Santibañez, F.E.; Ordaz-Silva, S.; Pedro-Méndez, J.G.; Chacón-Hernández, J.C. Evaluation of Ethanolic Powdered Extract of Magnolia tamaulipana Vazquez against Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae). Plants 2022, 11, 1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131711

AMA Style

Reyes-Zepeda F, Heinz-Castro RTQ, Olazaran-Santibañez FE, Ordaz-Silva S, Pedro-Méndez JG, Chacón-Hernández JC. Evaluation of Ethanolic Powdered Extract of Magnolia tamaulipana Vazquez against Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae). Plants. 2022; 11(13):1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131711

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reyes-Zepeda, Francisco, Rapucel Tonantzin Quetzalli Heinz-Castro, Fabian Eliseo Olazaran-Santibañez, Salvador Ordaz-Silva, José Guadalupe Pedro-Méndez, and Julio César Chacón-Hernández. 2022. "Evaluation of Ethanolic Powdered Extract of Magnolia tamaulipana Vazquez against Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae)" Plants 11, no. 13: 1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131711

APA Style

Reyes-Zepeda, F., Heinz-Castro, R. T. Q., Olazaran-Santibañez, F. E., Ordaz-Silva, S., Pedro-Méndez, J. G., & Chacón-Hernández, J. C. (2022). Evaluation of Ethanolic Powdered Extract of Magnolia tamaulipana Vazquez against Oligonychus punicae Hirst (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae). Plants, 11(13), 1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131711

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop