Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals the Genetic Basis of Kernel and Cob Moisture Changes in Maize at Physiological Maturity Stage
Next Article in Special Issue
Germination Behavior and Early Seedling Growth in Abies pinsapo Boiss. Seeds
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying the Variation in the Geometries of the Outer Rims of Corolla Tubes of Vinca major L.
Previous Article in Special Issue
Seed-to-Seedling Transition in Pisum sativum L.: A Transcriptomic Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Seed-to-Seedling Transition: Novel Aspects

Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(15), 1988; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11151988
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 27 July 2022 / Accepted: 28 July 2022 / Published: 30 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Transition from Seed to Seedling)

Abstract

:
Transition from seed to seedling represents a critical stage in plants’ life cycles. This process includes three significant events in the seeds: (i) tissue hydration, (ii) the mobilization of reserve nutrients, and (iii) the activation of metabolic activity. Global metabolic rearrangements lead to the initiation of radicle growth and the resumption of vegetative development. It requires massive reprogramming of the transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, and attendant signaling pathways, resulting in the silencing of seed-maturation genes and the activation of vegetative growth genes. This Special Issue discusses the mechanisms of genetic, epigenetic, and hormonal switches during seed-to-seedling transitions. Detailed information has also been covered regarding the influence of germination features on seedling establishment.

1. Introduction

In higher plants’ life cycle, transitions from seed to seedling represent a critical developmental step, dramatically affecting plant ontogenesis and stress tolerance. To establish seedlings at the appropriate time, seeds have evolved mechanisms to maintain dormancy until environmental conditions (temperature, moisture, and light) are favorable for germination [1,2,3]. Three phases of seed germination are recognized [4,5,6]. Phase I is primarily a physical process characterized by rapid water uptakes and the hydration of macromolecules. It results in the resumption of mitochondrial respiration and activation of DNA and membrane reparation. During phase II, the main metabolic processes, for example, the synthesis of new RNA, lipids, and proteins as well as the mobilization of reserve nutrients are activated. Phases I and II encompass important events that drive the seed from a quiescent to a germination state. Phase III represents the post-germination stage characterized by the progressive division and elongation of cells in the embryonic axes resulting in so-called “radicle protrusion.” This ultimately results in the loss of desiccation tolerance occurring in orthodox seeds during late germination [7,8,9].
Before plants can resume vegetative development, a massive reprogramming of the transcriptome and attendant signaling pathways is required. This results in the silencing of seed maturation genes and activation of vegetative growth genes. These genes, as a rule, are methylated during seed development and demethylated during germination [10]. A network of transcription factors known as LAFLs (LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and 2, ABSCISIC INHIBITOR3, and FUSCA3) and DELAY OF GERMINATION1 (DOG1) was described as the negative regulators of seed germination and should be repressed before the initiation of seedling development [11,12]. Their repression is associated with chromatin-remodeling complexes Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 and 2 (PRC1 and PRC2), as well as the PICKLE (PKL) and PICKLE-RELATED2 (PKR2) proteins [11,13,14].

2. Novel Aspects Discussed in the Special Issue

Smolikova et al. [15] reviewed the epigenetic and hormonal switches regulating seed-to-seedling transitions. Abscisic acid and gibberellins act as central endogenous regulators, controlling seed dormancy and germination antagonistically. However, in recent years, other hormones such as ethylene, cytokinins, brassinosteroids, auxins, and jasmonates have also been shown to be involved. The main result of hormone activity is the suppression of genes controlling seed maturation and the activation of those involved in vegetative growth. As previously described, epigenetic signaling provides a multifactorial and robust basis for the regulation of plant development and adaptation [16,17,18,19]. Smolikova et al. [15], therefore, also described primary epigenetic mechanisms involved in seed development and transitions from seed to seedling, such as DNA methylation, posttranslational modification of histones, and interaction with non-coding RNAs.
Research conducted by Smolikova et al. [20] deals with RNA sequencing-based transcriptomics in the embryonic axes isolated from pea seeds just before and after radicle protrusion. Seed-to-seedling transition was shown to involve a loss of desiccation tolerance, the initiation of secondary metabolism, and the activation of genes involved in defense responses to biotic stress. Many genes associated with auxin, ethylene, salicylic, and jasmonic acids were upregulated, while genes involved in the synthesis of transcription factors ABI3, ABI4, ABI5, and LEA14 were downregulated. Importantly, among LAFL genes, only ABI3 was expressed. Authors further observed the downregulation of ABA-related genes HVA22E, LTI65/RD29B, and LTP4 involved in responses to water deprivation as well as PER1 involved in the suppression of ABA catabolism and GA biosynthesis via reactive oxygen species elimination.
Next, Arif et al. [21] reviewed the genetic aspects of seed longevity and their relationship with seedling viability. The authors defined seed longevity as “the maximum time period during which seeds can germinate and produce viable seedlings capable of developing into healthy plants and bearing seeds for the next generation.” The authors summarized the most relevant genetic studies on seed longevity performed in Arabidopsis and some crop species such as rice, barley, wheat, maize, soybean, tobacco, lettuce, and tomato. This review contains further information about collections of various crops available worldwide and new emerging technologies for research on seed longevity.
Another three research studies, conducted by Ducatti et al., Ribeiro-Oliveira et al., and Wang et al., paid attention to the role of germination on seedling establishment [22,23,24]. Ducatti et al. [22] analyzed gene expression patterns during the germination of soybean seeds with different vigor. The authors showed a high correlation between germination and vigor for twenty genes. Among the target genes were EXPANSIN-LIKE A1, XYLOGLUCAN ENDOTRANSGLUCOSYLASE/HYDROLASE 22, 65-KDA MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN, XYLOGLUCAN ENDOTRANSGLUCOSYLASE/HYDROLASE 2, and N-GLYCOSYLASE/DNA LYASE OGG1. These transcripts are suggested for use as a tool for evaluating seed vigor.
Ribeiro-Oliveira et al. [23] showed that acceleration of water uptake during seed germination influences seedling vigor at the post-germination stage. The authors measured water dynamics in soybean seeds during germination, in seedlings during development, and clarified their relationship. They demonstrated that water dynamics are associated with embryo and seedling vigor and, thus, can help to predict seed vigor.
Wang et al. [24] selected six grape varieties’ conditions for the most efficient seed germination and seedling development. The authors tested different seed treatments such as stratification, chemical substances, beak cutting, and pre-germination to find the optimal combination for each variety. They propose using the developed approach for characterizing the germination and post-germination growth of seeds obtained by an intraspecific hybridization of grape varieties.

3. Future Perspectives

Transitions from seed to seedling are associated with a complex temporal sequence of signals. Exciting prospects for studying this phenomenon lie in the avenue of the epigenetic regulation of metabolic rearrangements. Transitions between active and repressive chromatin states in germinating seeds are still under active investigation, and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown. Our current knowledge mainly arises from studies in Arabidopsis. However, the mechanisms of seed germination and seedling establishment in another plant species may differ significantly. Comparative studies between Arabidopsis and other crops will certainly enrich practical applications. They will provide ample opportunities for dissecting the role of epigenetic variations in trait regulation, which can be utilized in crop improvement. The locus-specific manipulation of DNA methylation by epigenome-editing tools can facilitate the molecular breeding of important crop plants. We hope that the manuscripts from this Special Issue stimulate additional research on this critical topic.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.S. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, G.S. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Russian Science Foundation, grant number 20-16-00086.

Acknowledgments

We thank all contributors for their submission to the Special Issue and reviewers for the valuable input in improving the manuscripts. We also thank the editorial team staff for their kind support in managing this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huss, J.C.; Gierlinger, N. Functional packaging of seeds. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 2154–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nakabayashi, K.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and weed emergence: From simulating environmental change to understanding trait plasticity, adaptive evolution, and population fitness. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 4181–4185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yan, A.; Chen, Z. The control of seed dormancy and germination by temperature, light and nitrate. Bot. Rev. 2020, 86, 39–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bewley, J.D.; Bradford, K.J.; Hilhorst, H.W.M.; Nonogaki, H. Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-1-4614-4692-7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dorone, Y.; Boeynaems, S.; Flores, E.; Jin, B.; Hateley, S.; Bossi, F.; Lazarus, E.; Pennington, J.G.; Michiels, E.; De Decker, M.; et al. A prion-like protein regulator of seed germination undergoes hydration-dependent phase separation. Cell 2021, 184, 4284–4298.e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Weitbrecht, K.; Müller, K.; Leubner-Metzger, G. First off the mark: Early seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3289–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Smolikova, G.; Leonova, T.; Vashurina, N.; Frolov, A.; Medvedev, S. Desiccation tolerance as the basis of long-term seed viability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Marques, A.; Buijs, G.; Ligterink, W.; Hilhorst, H. Evolutionary ecophysiology of seed desiccation sensitivity. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Farrant, J.M.; Moore, J.P.; Hilhorst, H.W.M. Editorial: Unifying insights into the desiccation tolerance mechanisms of resurrection plants and seeds. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kawakatsu, T.; Nery, J.R.; Castanon, R.; Ecker, J.R. Dynamic DNA methylation reconfiguration during seed development and germination. Genome Biol. 2017, 18, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lepiniec, L.; Devic, M.; Roscoe, T.J.; Bouyer, D.; Zhou, D.-X.; Boulard, C.; Baud, S.; Dubreucq, B. Molecular and epigenetic regulations and functions of the LAFL transcriptional regulators that control seed development. Plant Reprod. 2018, 31, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nonogaki, H. A repressor complex silencing ABA signaling in seeds? J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 2847–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Matilla, A.J. Exploring breakthroughs in three traits belonging to seed life. Plants 2022, 11, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bouyer, D.; Roudier, F.; Heese, M.; Andersen, E.D.; Gey, D.; Nowack, M.K.; Goodrich, J.; Renou, J.-P.; Grini, P.E.; Colot, V.; et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 controls the embryo-to-seedling phase transition. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Smolikova, G.; Strygina, K.; Krylova, E.; Leonova, T.; Frolov, A.; Khlestkina, E.; Medvedev, S. Transition from seeds to seedlings: Hormonal and epigenetic aspects. Plants 2021, 10, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ueda, M.; Seki, M. Histone modifications form epigenetic regulatory networks to regulate abiotic stress response. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Perrone, A.; Martinelli, F. Plant stress biology in epigenomic era. Plant Sci. 2020, 294, 110376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lee, T.A.; Bailey-Serres, J. Integrative analysis from the epigenome to translatome uncovers patterns of dominant nuclear regulation during transient stress. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Han, Q.; Bartels, A.; Cheng, X.; Meyer, A.; An, Y.-Q.C.; Hsieh, T.-F.; Xiao, W. Epigenetics regulates reproductive development in plants. Plants 2019, 8, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Smolikova, G.; Strygina, K.; Krylova, E.; Vikhorev, A.; Bilova, T.; Frolov, A.; Khlestkina, E.; Medvedev, S. Seed-to-seedling transition in Pisum sativum L.: A transcriptomic approach. Plants 2022, 11, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Arif, M.A.R.; Afzal, I.; Börner, A. Genetic aspects and molecular causes of seed longevity in plants—A review. Plants 2022, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ducatti, K.R.; Batista, T.B.; Hirai, W.Y.; Luccas, D.A.; Moreno, L.D.A.; Guimarães, C.C.; Bassel, G.W.; da Silva, E.A.A. Transcripts expressed during germination sensu stricto are associated with vigor in soybean seeds. Plants 2022, 11, 1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ribeiro-Oliveira, J.P.; Bosseli, M.A.; da Silva, E.A.A. Acceleration in germination sensu stricto plays a central role on seedling vigor in post-germination. Plants 2021, 10, 2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, Z.-L.; Hui, M.; Shi, X.-Q.; Wu, D.; Wang, Y.; Han, X.; Cao, X.; Yao, F.; Li, H.; Wang, H. Characteristics of the seed germination and seedlings of six grape varieties (V. vinifera). Plants 2022, 11, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smolikova, G.; Medvedev, S. Seed-to-Seedling Transition: Novel Aspects. Plants 2022, 11, 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11151988

AMA Style

Smolikova G, Medvedev S. Seed-to-Seedling Transition: Novel Aspects. Plants. 2022; 11(15):1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11151988

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smolikova, Galina, and Sergei Medvedev. 2022. "Seed-to-Seedling Transition: Novel Aspects" Plants 11, no. 15: 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11151988

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop