Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Pericarp Functional Traits in Capparis spinosa from Coastal and Inland Mediterranean Habitats
Next Article in Special Issue
Cannabis Synthetic Seeds: An Alternative Approach for Commercial Scale of Clonal Propagation and Germplasm Conservation
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition and Bioinsecticidal Effects of Thymus zygis L., Salvia officinalis L. and Mentha suaveolens Ehrh. Essential Oils on Medfly Ceratitis capitata and Tomato Leaf Miner Tuta absoluta
Previous Article in Special Issue
Establishing an Efficient Regeneration System for Tissue Culture in Bougainvillea buttiana ‘Miss Manila’
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Incorporation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Tissue Culture for Producing Genetically Stable Plants

1
Research Laboratory of Horticultural Sciences, National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, University of Carthage, Tunis 1082, Tunisia
2
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Tunis 1004, Tunisia
3
Department of Animal and Rangeland Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
4
Research Unit of Biodiversity and Valorization of Resources in Mountainous Areas, School of Higher Education in Agriculture of Mateur, University of Carthage, Mateur 7030, Tunisia
5
Laboratoire des Substances Naturelles, Institut National de Recherche et d’Analyse Physico-Chimique, Biotechpole de Sidi Thabet, Ariana 2020, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(22), 3087; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223087
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Revised: 7 November 2022 / Accepted: 9 November 2022 / Published: 14 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Tissue Culture III)

Abstract

:
The growing demand for native planting material in ecological restoration and rehabilitation for agro-silvo-pastoral ecosystems has resulted in a major global industry in their sourcing, multiplication, and sale. Plant tissue culture is used for producing high-quality, disease-free, and true-to-type plants at a fast rate. Micropropagation can help to meet the increasing demand for planting material and afforestation programs. However, in vitro plant propagation is an expensive technique compared to conventional methods using suckers, seeds, and cuttings. Therefore, adopting measures to lower production costs without compromising plant quality is essential. This can be achieved by improving the culture media composition. Incorporating organic growth additives can stimulate tissue growth and increase the number of shoots, leaves, and roots in culture media. Organic growth supplementation speeds up the formation and development of cultures and yields vigorous plants. Plant regeneration from meristems (shoot tips and axillary buds) is a reliable way to produce true-to-type plants compared with callus and somatic embryogenesis regeneration, but in vitro culture environments can be mutagenic. Therefore, detecting somaclonal variations at an early stage of development is considered crucial in propagating plants. The genetic stability of in vitro regenerated plants needs to be ascertained by using DNA-based molecular markers. This review aims to provide up-to-date research progress on incorporating organic growth additives to enhance in vitro tissue culture protocols and to emphasize the importance of using PCR-based molecular markers such as RAPD, ISSR, SSR, and SCoT. The review was assessed based on the peer-reviewed works published in scientific databases including Science Direct, Scopus, Springer, JSTOR, onlinelibrary, and Google Scholar.

1. Introduction

Climate change and induced human activities have negatively impacted agro-silvo-pastoral ecosystems across the planet [1,2]. The global push to achieve ecosystem restoration targets has resulted in an increased demand for native plant material that current production systems are unable to satisfy [3]. Using native species in restoration efforts is critical for recreating or maintaining healthy, resistant, and resilient ecosystems and communities [4]. Therefore, the development of methods for the large-scale plantations of selected genotypes of medicinal, pastoral, and forest species has become increasingly important in view of the need for the rehabilitation of marginal and degraded rangelands [5,6,7]. Regeneration of plants via in vitro tissue culture is considered to be an efficient approach for clonal plant propagation. Developing protocols for successful plant tissue culture is complicated because there are various interacting factors. Plant raw material, culture conditions, and culture media composition are determining factors in the quality of the final product obtained in any plant cell culture protocol [8]. The choice of nutritional components and growth regulators is one of the most important factors governing the growth and morphogenesis of the plant tissues in culture [9]. There are many components and additives used in plant micropropagation media which vary according to the plant species, cultivar, or explant type and must be experimentally defined for each case [10]. For the optimal growth of tissues in vitro, nutritional requirements should be present in optimum concentrations [11]. Micropropagation media are generally made up of these components: macronutrients, micronutrients, vitamins, amino acids, sugar, gelling agents, and growth regulators [12]. However, these compounds are expensive and pose risks if added in inadequate amounts [13]. Therefore, many studies have been conducted to explore the modification of culture media composition by adding low-cost organic materials as an alternative to expensive materials without compromising the quality of the produced plants [14,15,16]. A variety of organic growth additives such as coconut water, banana pulp, yeast extract, tomato juice, papaya juice, potato homogenate, and pineapple pulp can be very effective in promoting plant growth and development [17,18]. Such organic growth additives provide undefined mixtures of organic nutrients and growth factors [19]. The reasons for applying organic growth additives to the culture medium, besides being a natural source of carbon, are because they contain natural vitamins, phenols, fiber, hormones, proteins, lipids, and minerals [10]. An overview of culture media composition modification for plant tissue propagation with special regard to organic growth additives and the importance of using PCR-based molecular markers to establish the genetic stability of in vitro regenerated plants are discussed in this paper. The literature was obtained through a keyword-based search on Science Direct, Scopus, Springer, JSTOR, onlinelibrary, and Google Scholar. All databases up to July 2022 are considered.

2. Supplementation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Culture Techniques

Adding organic growth additives to culture media, individually or in combination, accelerates shoot initiation and proliferation. Depending on the species and genotype, different types and concentrations of organic nutrients are needed for the success of in vitro cultures (Table 1) [12,20,21,22]. Several studies were conducted to evaluate the nutritional role of organic additives and their impact on shoot regeneration and growth to induce rhizogenesis and produce viable plantlets [17,23].

2.1. Vegetable, Fruit, and Plant Extracts

The growth and development of tissues vary for different plants according to their nutritional requirements. Tissues from different parts of plants may also have different requirements for satisfactory growth. Commonly, culture media are supplemented with a variety of organic substances or extracts including coconut milk, pineapple pulp, papaya juice, banana homogenate, orange juice, and tomato juice, to test their effect on growth enhancement [49].
Wiszniewska et al. [24] reported the successful micropropagation protocol of three Daphne species (Daphne caucasica, Daphne tangutica, and Daphne jasminea) on MS media supplemented with organic growth additives, including coconut water and pineapple pulp. Daud et al. [25], on in vitro regeneration of Celosia sp. using five kinds of organic growth additives, showed that young coconut juice (YCJ) at 70 mL/L induced the highest shoot regeneration (14.21), banana and tomato juices promoted the highest shoot regeneration of stem segments at 50 mL/L which produced 9.57 and 9.28 shoots per explants, and papaya juice, at the lowest concentration (20 mL/L), showed the highest shoot regeneration (10.5). Different organic growth additives such as coconut water, coconut milk, grind spinach leaves, grind potato tubers, grind carrot, rice flour, green gram, grind pumpkin, banana fruit, and orange juice were assayed by Manawadu et al. [14] to enhance in vitro regeneration of Raphanus sativus. The best response was observed in MS supplemented with 10% orange juice which produced the highest number of shoots (12 shoots/explant). Banana powder (BW), coconut water (CW), and potato dextrose (PD) were added to a basal seed sowing media of Epidendrum nocturnum. The culture medium with 10 mL/L CW showed the greatest germination percentage (71% and 76.75%) compared to 60 and 90 days after seed sowing. Media with 5 g/L BW + 5 mL/L CW showed greater values of plant length (19.80 mm), number of roots (2.1), and fresh weight (0.08 g) [16]. The effect of various organic additives (coconut water, birch sap, maple sap, and banana powder) on in vitro germination, protocorm formation, and seedling growth from Cypripedium macranthos on one-quarter MS medium was investigated during asymbiotic seed culture. The highest germination and protocorm formation percentages were achieved (70.8% and 74.2%) when 100 mL/L of coconut water was added to the basal medium. With 100 mL/L of birch sap or maple sap, the germination and protocorm formation percentages were over 65% and 68% [15]. Knudson C media supplemented with organic growth additives (coconut water, tomato juice, and banana pulp) at different concentrations for Dendrobium lowii in vitro propagation showed a notable protocorm development when treated with 25 g/L of banana pulp compared to the other supplements. It showed the highest growth index value of 593.3 with 100% of protocorms that successfully developed shoots and 93.3% of protocorms producing roots [26].
Supplementing coconut water (50 and 100 mL/L) for Musa cv. Rajabulu in vitro propagation showed the best results on the number of roots (9.33; 9) and root length (11.6; 10.76 cm). With CW concentrations from 50 to 200 mL/L, acclimatization was 100% [27]. Selakorn et al. [18] found that when CW (at 200 mL/L) was supplemented to MS medium, the highest number of shoots/explant (1.71), the highest shoot length (4.25 cm), and the highest number of leaves/explant (4) were recorded on Musa acuminata in vitro multiplication. For mass propagation of the endangered orchid Dendrobium chryseum, supplementing 10% CW to one-half MS medium resulted in the highest number of shoots as well as the longest [28]. The multiplication rate of Dianthus caryophyllus increased over four times when the shoot tip and nodal segment were used as explants on MS medium supplemented with 10% CW [29]. However, when 5% CW was added to one-half MS medium, the highest germination percentage for Gastrochilus matsuran was 93.3% [30]. Adding 4% coconut water with 3% sucrose increased the shoot elongation of Hylocereus polyrhizus to 2.45 cm [31]. MS media enriched with 2% CW enhanced shoot multiplication for Echinacea purpurea to 2.58 buds per explant [32].
Adding tomato juice (TJ) to promote shoot regeneration and multiplication of Physalis angulata produced the maximum shoot number (12.5) in MS supplemented with 5% TJ while the maximum shoot length (10.7 cm) was obtained with 7.5% TJ [33]. Phytamax media supplemented with 100 mL/L pineapple juice for in vitro propagation of Laelia rubescens resulted in the highest seedling height (1.31 cm), the number of leaves per seedling (3.33), and roots (2.33) [34]. However, at 200 mL/L, pineapple juice showed the highest results with 56% asymbiotic germination and 25.8 in seedling formation for in vitro development of xLaeliocattleya on MS medium [35].
Aloe vera gel (AvG) is the most commonly used part of the plant because of its biological effectiveness and chemical composition (carbohydrates, organic acids, proteins, phenolic compounds, vitamins, minerals, and amino acids) [49]. AvG has gained attention because of its interesting antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Nowadays, it is proposed as an alternative to conventional additives used in plant micropropagation media [36,37,38]. Hamdeni et al. [36] reported that AvG served as an organic nutritional supplement for the enhancement of A. vera in vitro propagation protocol. The work of Haque and Ghosh [37] on A. vera showed that the highest number of formed shoots per explant (length ≥ 2 cm) was 17.8 shoots on MS medium supplemented with 10% AvG. For root induction, adding AvG (20% and 30%) to one-third of MS increased the response to 100% rooting, the number of roots per shoot (9.8; 9.2), and the length of the roots (3.1; 2.8). The study on the in vitro micropropagation of Bacopa chamaedryoides reported that the best rooting response (100%), number (18.3), and length (2.3 cm) of the shoot were achieved on one-half strength MS medium supplemented with 50% AvG [38].

2.2. Amino Acids, Polyamines, and Proteins

Most plants can synthesize the essential requirements of amino acids for cell proliferation and regeneration. Despite this, the exogenous supply of amino acids to culture media plays an important role in stimulating cell growth and the morphogenesis of tissues. Unlike inorganic nitrogen, amino acids are easily assimilated by plant cells and tissues [50]. Saad and Elshahed [51] suggested that plant cells have a higher capacity to take up and transport nitrogen from organic sources rather than inorganic ones. Several studies have reported using amino acids as an organic nitrogen source during in vitro propagation of several species such as Fragaria × Ananassa duch cv. Chandler, Oryza sativa, Rosa centifolia, Carica papaya, and Hibiscus moscheutos to enhance plant tissue growth and increase their regeneration [52,53,54,55,56]. According to Mandal et al. [39], a combination of all amino acids (methionine, glutamic acid, glycine, tryptophane, proline, lycine, arginine, and glutamine) in 20 mg/L concentrations resulted in the best axillary shoot proliferation response (100%) on Aegle marmelos and average shoot number per explant (2.22) when cultured on MS medium supplemented with 2 mg/L BAP. Baskaran et al. [57] reported that the type and amount of amino acids used in the medium have a significant effect on growth and multiple shoot development. Khatri et al. [40] evaluated three nitrogen sources, adenine sulfate (Ads), casein hydrolysate (CH), and putrescine (PU) for their ability to enhance in vitro shoot multiplication of Chlorophytum borivilianum. It confirmed that including 20 mg/L of Ads to MS medium supplemented with 2 mg/L BAP + 1 mg/L NAA resulted in the best shoot induction response (96.67%). For rooting, one-half MS supplemented with 9 mg/L PU + 2 mg/L IBA was best with 83.33% root induction. Samiei et al. [41] found that adding 600 mg/L of casein hydrolysate to the Vander Salm medium resulted in the maximum shoot number (4.1 shoots/explant) while glutamic acid at 12 mg/L enhanced shoot regeneration and leaf number of Rosa canina. Glutamine at 30 mg/L and asparagine at 20 mg/L concentrations improved shoot multiplication of Orthosiphon aristatus on MS medium supplemented with 1 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L Kn [42]. David et al. [43] reported the rapid development from the protocorms of Vanda helvola (99.5%) treated in Knudson C medium containing 0.1% peptone, which successfully produced 3.10 leaves with an average length of 10.97 mm per responsive explant after 90 days of culture. Casein hydrolysate at 0.05% was most effective on Stevia rebaudiana in vitro propagation, which resulted in 90% regeneration frequency, a maximum of 15 shoots, and a shoot length of 6 cm per explant [44].

2.3. Essential Oils

In vitro microbial contamination is one of the most serious problems when culturing tissue. Using plant extracts such as essential oils for explant disinfection and establishing an aseptic culture medium to replace autoclaving was found to be an alternative procedure for plant tissue culture [58]. Oxidative browning from the accumulation and oxidation of polyphenols in the media is another impediment to in vitro propagation. For the successful establishment of in vitro tissue cultures, it is necessary to limit the oxidation of phenolics, the source of enzymatic browning, and inhibit microbial growth [45]. In the study of Hamdeni et al. [45], Rosmarinus officinalis and Thymus vulgaris essential oils were assayed for their effectiveness in controlling enzymatic browning and contamination of cultures from Aloe vera. While T. vulgaris essential oil inhibited explant growth, R. officinalis induced the highest explant survival percentage (100%) with no signs of browning after four weeks of culture with concentrations of 0.05%, 0.075%, and 0.1%. The lowest infection percentage (10%) was observed for media containing 0.075% and 0.1% of R. officinalis. The highest average number of leaves per explant was 3.71 with 0.1% R. officinalis and the greatest leaf length was 3.18 cm with 0.05%. According to Taghizadeh et al. [46], sterile medium conditions were obtained by using eugenol, carvacrol, or thymol at 0.01% and 0.5% which inhibited the growth of fungi and bacteria contaminations respectively with no autoclaving of the medium and vessels. The inhibitory effect of essential oils from Mentha piperita, Thymus vulgaris, and Cinnamomum camphora against common fungal contamination affecting the tissue culture of Phoenix dactylifera was reported by Jasim et al. [47]. These essential oils at 2% each resulted in 100% inhibition of mycelium growth of fungi species (Alternaria spp., Fusarium spp., and Aspergillus spp.) compared to the control treatment (10% of fungal contamination) with no disinfecting agent. The disinfecting properties of thymol and carvacrol (at 200 mg/L each and for 60 to 120 min exposure time) led to the appropriate control of fungi and bacterial infection of Cynodon dactylon nodal explants [48].

3. Marker-Assisted Genetic Stability Assay

The unsustainable use of natural resources has harmful consequences that threaten biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services and negatively affect human well-being. Promoting conservation is recommended to halt the erosion of genetic resources and habitats and maintain ecosystem functions [59]. Where preserving the original gene pool is of primary importance, micropropagated plant materials are an appropriate tool for biodiversity restoration (conservation, re-introduction, and recovery) of rare, endangered, and threatened plant species [60,61]. Even though plant regeneration from organized meristems (shoot tips and axillary buds) is a reliable way to produce true-to-type plants compared with callus and somatic embryogenesis regeneration, in vitro culture environments can be mutagenic [62,63,64]. DNA methylation, point mutations, and chromosome rearrangements are the major causes of somaclonal variation, which arises due to in vitro stresses such as artificial lighting, nutrient compounds [64,65], plant growth regulators [66,67,68], explant source and genotype, culture duration, and subculture number [62,63,69,70,71,72,73,74]. Hussien et al. [64] reported that the interaction between sucrose and minerals levels led to somaclonal variation (38.33%) among Populus alba propagated plants. The supplementation of high concentrations of copper sulphate to the MS medium showed polymorphism among Musa sp. in vitro regenerated plants when treated with 60 mg/L with an average of 1.8% [65]. Bhattacharyya et al. [66] indicated that plant growth regulators (BA and meta-topolin) showed clonal variability at various stages of sub-culturing as well as after successful acclimatization due to their residual toxicity which led to DNA damage and microsatellite instability within the micropropagated plantlets of Ansellia africana. A low level of genetic polymorphism of Lilium davidii occurred when BA and TDZ cytokinins were supplemented to the culture media [67]. The highest genetic variability (16%) of Rhododendron ‘Kazimierz Odnowiciel’ was found for both BA and TDZ compared to the other cytokinins combinations [68]. The maintaining of cultures for a long period and callus regeneration from Spondias pinnata resulted in slight polymorphism (12.5%), which may be due to the stress of in vitro culture conditions [63]. Micropropagated plantlets and callus-derived regenerants from Camellia sinensis showed molecular changes after 7 years of in vitro propagation with polymorphism percentages ranging from 43% to 67% [73]. Genetic variation occurred among two genotypes (Mississippi and SWD) of Anthurium andraeanum after callus induction and long-term maintenance [74]. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm true-to-type propagules at an early stage of development. Molecular, biochemical, and morphological analyses are the main approaches for determining the clonal stability of in vitro-generated plantlets [75,76,77,78,79]. PCR-based molecular markers such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) have been found to be enormously helpful in ascertaining the genetic stability of in vivo cultivated as well as in vitro regenerated plants [80,81]. Although RAPD primers have been successfully used for assessing the genetic stability of several species, they have a number of limitations such as reproducibility and dominance [82,83]. Consequently, using a different molecular marker system is required to provide a more reliable result.
Recently, many DNA molecular markers have been developed to confirm genetic stability. Among them, the most advanced and reliable with high reproducibility rates are inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR) and start codon targeted (SCoT) [84]. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers have also gained considerable importance in genetic stability assessment due to their high reproducibility, co-dominant inheritance nature, sensitivity, and strong discriminatory power [85]. A promotional effect of organic growth additives (amino acids, polyamines, proteins, plant, and fruits extracts) in stimulating cells proliferation, morphogenesis, and tissues development was reported by several authors, but the genetic stability of in vivo cultivated as well as in vitro regenerated plants needs to be ascertained [86,87,88] (Table 2).

3.1. RAPD Analysis

The optimum development and maturation of somatic embryos from Sterculia alata were observed by the supplementation of 400 mg/L Gln to MS medium as a nitrogen source. The genetic analysis using 25 RAPD primers produced a total number of 181 amplification bands with an average of 7.24 bands per primer. The amplification profiles generated the same banding pattern in all the samples confirming that the supplementation of amino acids to the in vitro propagation protocol is reliable in producing true-to-type plants [89]. Thakur et al. [93] found that adding 10 mg/L of CH to the MS medium resulted in the best multiplication rate (5.08) and shoot elongation with an average shoot length of 2.94 cm of Prunus salicina. Out of 16 RAPD primers tested, 14 primers produced 43 amplification fragments ranging from 200 to 1500 bp in size. All banding profiles were monomorphic across all the tested plants and similar to those of the mother plant. The work of Al-Mayahi [90] indicates that adding polyamines (PU and Spd) to MS medium of Phoenix dactylifera is beneficial in producing genetically stable plants. All four RAPD primers showed amplifications with monomorphic bands among both in vitro-derived plants and the mother plant. The two types of polyamines at 75 mg/L each were the most effective treatments in root formation and number. Gurme et al. [91] reported that when 15% CW was supplemented to MS medium, the best shooting frequency (90%) and plant numbers (18) from Amorphophallus paeoniifolius were obtained. Among 10 RAPD primers tested, only 6 generated a total of 292 bands without any polymorphic bands between 10 in vitro regenerants and their mother plant. Ten RAPD primers were used to evaluate the genetic profile of Rhynchostylis retusa tissue cultured plantlets developed under CW and fungal elicitor treatments. The highest shoot numbers and lengths were found on MS medium supplemented with 10% CW while the fungal elicitor showed the best response for root number and length. All RAPD primers produced 23 amplification bands ranging in size from 275 to 1100 bp. The genetic stability among in vitro cultured plants and the mother plant was maintained [88]. Adding 1% AvLE to MS liquid media fully controlled culture contamination and enhanced shoot numbers and lengths of Bambusa balcooa. Out of 20 RAPD primers, only 8 yielded 22.44 reproducible and scorable bands with 2.8 bands per primer ranging in size from 100 to 1800 bp. All amplified bands were monomorphic revealing that Bambusa balcooa plants retained their genetic stability [92].

3.2. ISSR Analysis

Nandhakumar et al. [94] reported that 10 ISSR primers were used to assess the genetic stability of Musa spp. (Cultivars Grand Naine and Rasthali) when Pro and Gln were added to MS media. Gln (400 mg/L) significantly enhanced the number of both primary (1680, 1850) and secondary (3597, 3270) somatic embryos per culture from Grand Naine and Rasthali cultivars, respectively. ISSR primers generated a total of 1534 and 1488 bands ranging from 200 bp to 2500 bp in size in Grand Naine and Rasthali cultivars, respectively, giving rise to only monomorphic bands across all the tested plants in both cultivars.

3.3. SSR Analysis

Natarajan et al. [87] found that the highest somatic embryo induction (85%) was observed when CH (100 mg/L) and Gln (150 mg/L) were supplemented to the nutrient media of Musa AAB cultivar Chenichampa as compared to the control. No somaclonal variations were detected using 10 SSR primers among the embryogenic cell suspension-derived plants and their mother plant. Asadi-Aghbolaghi et al. [95] reported that the highest embryogenic callus induction was observed when CH (100 mg/L) and Gln (500 mg/L) were supplemented to the culture media of Stipagrostis pennata. Ten SSR primes were tested, out of which four showed a single amplification band size of 185, 412, 243, and 210 bp for primers 1, 3, 7, and 8, respectively. The regeneration protocols adding both CH and Gln as organic growth additives showed genetic stability using SSR primers which makes these protocols reliable.

3.4. Combined Markers Analysis (RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT)

For better genetic stability analysis, it is highly recommended to use a combination of more than one type of molecular marker that amplifies different regions of the plant genome.

3.4.1. RAPD and ISSR Analysis

RAPD and ISSR analysis confirmed the genetic stability of both Valeriana jatamansi [96] and Ranunculus wallichianus [97] in vitro regenerated plants on MS medium supplemented with 10% CW. For Valeriana jatamansi propagation protocol, CW supplementation resulted in the maximum response with regard to shoot and root numbers and lengths (13, 19.6, 6, and 7.5 cm), respectively. Out of 35 RAPD and 10 ISSR primers analyzed, only 10 RAPD and 5 ISSR primers produced a total of 32 and 12 similar banding patterns between in vitro raised plantlets and the mother plant, respectively [96]. For Ranunculus wallichianus, adding CW to MS medium resulted in the highest regeneration response (97%), the number of shoots formed (11.1 shoots/culture), and shoot length (9.2 cm). Nine RAPD and eight ISSR primers produced 56 and 47 bands with an average of six and five bands per primer ranging from 200 to 1500 bp and 200 to 1000 bp in size, respectively [97]. Krishnan et al. [86] approved the significant efficacy of incorporating plant extracts such as SSE into the culture medium. The SSE supplementation in a dose-dependent manner resulted in the highest shoot and root length and root biomass. Only two RAPD (out of six) and four ISSR (out of eleven) primers produced stable amplicons with 11 and 26 monomorphic amplicons, respectively.

3.4.2. RAPD and SCoT Analysis

RAPD and SCoT markers proved the genetic stability of both Citrullus lanatus [98] and Pisum sativum [99] in vitro-raised plants when the two polyamines (Spd and PU) were supplemented to their nutrient media. Spd and PU at 10 mg/L each, increased the shoot induction response (93%), shoot number (46.43 shoots/explant), and shoot elongation (6.3 cm) for Citrullus lanatus. The highest rooting percentage (95%) with the production of 23.03 roots per shoot measuring 4.32 cm in length was also recorded. In total, 9 RAPD and 17 SCoT primers produced 41 and 47 monomorphic fragments in the size range of 200 to 1800 and 300 to 2000 bp, respectively [98]. However, Spd at 20 mg/L resulted in the highest multiple shoot numbers (65.1 shoots/explant) while PU at 30 mg/L produced the highest number of roots (33.66 roots/shoot) for Pisum sativum. Nine RAPD and 17 SCoT primers produced 34 and 38 monomorphic fragments with the ranges of 400 to 600 and 100 to 500 bp, respectively [99].

3.4.3. ISSR and SCoT Analysis

Both ISSR and SCoT markers certified the genetic stability of Helicteres isora regenerated on MS medium supplemented with Gln. At 50 mg/L concentration, it produced the highest shoot numbers (21.3, 16.9) from both cotyledonary node and axillary node explants, respectively. Five ISSR primers (out of ten) produced 27 reproducible bands with 5.4 bands per primer varying in size from 0.3 to 2.2 kb. Out of the 17 SCoT primers tried, 13 produced 63 monomorphic bands with 4.8 bands per primer ranging in size from 0.3 to 3 kb. In both ISSR and SCoT techniques, all the resolved bands were monomorphic to all in vitro regenerated plants as well as their in vivo-based mother plant [100].

4. Conclusions

The most recent results summarized in this review show that micropropagation techniques can be enhanced by supplementing organic growth additives for producing genetically stable plants to meet the increasing demand for planting raw materials. However, it is extremely important to understand the structure-mode of action relationship of these supplements. In this regard, mutual cooperation between biotechnologists, chemists, and biologists may play a major role in proposing adequate growth additives for each plant species. That strategy could be an efficient tool for the rehabilitation of degraded landscapes and biodiversity restoration via the large-scale production of selected genotypes of medicinal, pastoral, and forest species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.H., M.L. and T.B.; writing—original draft preparation, I.H. and S.S.; writing—review and editing, I.H., M.L., A.B. and T.B.; funding acquisition, M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and the LCSR initiative of the OneCGIAR, and the APC was also funded by the same source of funding.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Research Laboratory of Horticultural Sciences within the National Institute of Agronomy of Tunisia (INAT) and the National Institute of Research and Physico-chemical Analyses of Sidi Thabet (LR15INRAP02) with support from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and the Livestock, Climate and Systems Resilience (LCSR) initiative of the OneCGIAR.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AAN: Arabinogalactan; Ads: Adenine sulfate; Arg: Arginine; Asn: Asparagine; AvG: Aloe vera gel; AvLE: Artemisia vulgaris leaf extract; B: Bean sprout extract; BAP: 6-Benzylaminopurine; BF: Banana fruit; BJ: Banana juice; bp: Base pair; BP: Banana pulp; BSP: Birch sap; BW: Banana powder; CH: Casein hydrolysate; CHT: Chitosan; CM: Coconut milk; CW: Coconut water; EO: Essential oil; GA3: Gibberellic acid; GC: Grind carrot; GG: Green gram; GI: Growth index; Gln: Glutamine; Glu: Glutamic acid; Gly: Glycine; GP: Grind pumpkin; GPT: Grind potato tubers; GSL: Grind spinach leaves; IAA: Indole-3-acetic acid; kb: kilobase; KC: Knudson C; Kn: Kinetin; LH: Lactabumin hydrolysis; Lys: Lysine; MCJ: Mature coconut juice; MCW: Mature coconut water; ME: Malt extract; Met: Methionine; MI: Myo-inositol; MS: Murashige and Skoog; MSP: Maple sap; NAA: α-naphthaleneacetic acid; OJ: Orange juice; OSM: Orchid seed sowing medium; P: Peptone; PD: Potato dextrose; PG: phloroglucinol; Phy: Phytamax; PJ: Papaya juice; PLBs: Protocorm-like bodies; PP: Pineapple pulp; PPJ: Pineapple juice; Pro: Proline; PU: Putrescine; RF: Rice Flour; SC: Sodium citrate; Spd: Spermidine; Spm: Spermine; SSE: Sprouted sorghum extract; TDZ: Thidiazuron; TJ: Tomato juice; Trp: Tryptophane; VS: Vander Salm; WJ: Watermelon juice; Y: Yeast; YCJ: Young coconut juice; YE: Yeast extract.

References

  1. Ouled Belgacem, A.; Louhaichi, M. The vulnerability of native rangeland plant species to global climate change in the West Asia and North African regions. Clim. Chang. 2013, 119, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hudson, L.N.; Newbold, T.; Contu, S.; Hill, S.L.L.; Lysenko, I.; De Palma, A.; Phillips, H.R.P.; Senior, R.A.; Bennett, D.J.; Booth, H.; et al. The PREDICTS database: A global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4, 4701–4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pedrini, S.; Gibson-Roy, P.; Trivedi, C.; Gálvez-Ramírez, C.; Hardwick, K.; Shaw, N.; Frischie, S.; Laverack, G.; Dixon, K. Ecological Restoration Collection and production of native seeds for ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, S228–S238. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baughman, B.O.W.; Kulpa, S.M.; Sheley, R.L. Four paths toward realizing the full potential of using native plants during ecosystem restoration in the Intermountain West. Rangelands 2022, 44, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. De Carlo, A.; Tarraf, W.; Lambardi, M.; Benelli, C. Temporary Immersion System for Production of Biomass and Bioactive Compounds from Medicinal Plants. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Louhaichi, M.; Gamoun, M.; Ben Salem, F.; Ouled Belgacem, A. Rangeland Biodiversity and Climate Variability: Supporting the Need for Flexible Grazing Management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yirdaw, E.; Tigabu, M.; Monge, A. Rehabilitation of degraded dryland ecosystems—Review. Silva Fenn. 2017, 51, 1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hameg, R.; Arteta, T.A.; Landin, M.; Gallego, P.P.; Barreal, M.E. Modeling and optimizing culture medium mineral composition for in vitro propagation of Actinidia arguta. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 554905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chimdessa, E. Composition and preparation of plant tissue culture medium. J. Tissue Cult. Bioeng. 2020, 3, 281–286. [Google Scholar]
  10. Khorsha, S.; Alizadeh, M.; Mashayekhi, K. The usefulness of apricot gum as an organic additive in grapevine tissue culture media. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 30, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  11. Häkkinen, S.T.; Reuter, L.; Nuorti, N.; Joensuu, J.J.; Rischer, H.; Ritala, A. Tobacco BY-2 media component optimization for a cost-effcient recombinant protein production. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Moraes, M.C.; Camolesi, M.R.; Palmieri, D.A.; Bertão, M.R. Commercial fertilizers and organic additives in orchid micropropagation. Plant Cell Cult. Micropropag. 2020, 16, e162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Häkkinen, S.T.; Nygren, H.; Nohynek, L.; Pimiä, R.P.; Heiniö, R.L.; Maiorova, N.; Rischer, H.; Ritala, A. Plant cell cultures as food—Aspects of sustainability and safety. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 1655–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Manawadu, I.; Dahanayake, N.; Senanayake, S.G.N. Effects of different natural organic additives on in vitro shoot regeneration of Raphanus sativus L. var. beeralu. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 219–223. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huh, Y.S.; Lee, J.K.; Nam, S.Y.; Paek, K.Y.; Suh, G.U. Improvement of asymbiotic seed germination and seedling development of Cypripedium macranthos Sw. with organic additives. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. De Stefano, D.; Costa, B.N.S.; Downing, J.; Fallahi, E.; Khoddamzadeh, A.A. In-vitro micropropagation and acclimatization of an endangered native orchid using organic supplements. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 380–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, K.; Zeng, S.; Lin, D.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Bu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Duan, J. In vitro propagation and reintroduction of the endangered Renanthera imschootiana Rolfe. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Selakorn, O.; Phasinam, K.; Kassanuk, T.; Sutaphan, S. Influence of organic additives on multiple shoot formation of Musa (AA Group) ‘Kluai Nam Thai’ in vitro. Rajabhat J. Sci. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2020, 21, 347–353. [Google Scholar]
  19. Thejaswini, R.; Narasimhan, S. Undefined organic additives stimulate in vitro seed germination of Dendrobium Ovatum (willd.) Kraenzl, a medicinal orchid. Int. J. Pharma Med. Biol. Sci. 2017, 6, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Venkatachalam, P.; Kalaiarasi, K.; Sreeramanan, S. Influence of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and various additives on in vitro plant propagation of Bambusa arundinacea (Retz.) Wild: A recalcitrant bamboo species. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2015, 13, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Utami, E.S.W.; Hariyanto, S.; Manuhara, Y.S.W. In vitro propagation of the endangered medicinal orchid, Dendrobium lasianthera J.J.Sm through mature seed culture. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017, 7, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zahara, M.; Datta, A.; Boonkorkaew, P.; Mishra, A. The effects of different media, sucrose concentrations and natural additives on plantlet growth of Phalaenopsis hybrid ‘Pink’. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2017, 60, e160149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kaur, S.; Bhutani, K.K. Organic growth supplement stimulants for in vitro multiplication of Cymbidium pendulum (Roxb.) Sw. Hortic. Sci. 2012, 39, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wiszniewska, A.; Fajerska, E.H.; Grabski, K.; Tukaj, Z. Promoting effects of organic medium supplements on the micropropagation of promising ornamental Daphne species (Thymelaeaceae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2013, 49, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Daud, N.; Taha, R.M.; Noor, N.N.M.; Alimon, H. Effects of different organic additives on in vitro shoot regeneration of Celosia sp. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 14, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gansau, J.A.; Indan, H.; Abdullah, S.N.; David, D.; Marbawi, H.; Jawan, R. Effects of organic additives and plant growth regulators on protocorm development of Dendrobium lowii. Trans. Sci. Technol. 2016, 3, 462–468. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mardhikasari, S.; Yunus, A.; Samanhudi, S. Modification of media for banana in vitro propagation with foliar fertilizer and coconut water in cv. Rajabulu. Caraka Tani J. Sustain. Agric. 2020, 35, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maharjan, S.; Thakuri, L.S.; Thapa, B.B.; Pradhan, S.; Pant, K.K.; Joshi, G.P.; Pant, B. In vitro propagation of the endangered orchid Dendrobium chryseum Rolfe from protocorms culture. Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 19, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khatun, M.; Roy, P.K.; Razzak, M.A. Additive effect of coconut water with various hormones on in vitro regeneration of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2018, 28, 589–596. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kang, H.; Kang, K.W.; Kim, D.H.; Sivanesan, I. In vitro propagation of Gastrochilus matsuran (Makino) Schltr., an endangered epiphytic orchid. Plants 2020, 9, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ng, Z.C.; Tan, S.H.; Shiekh Mahmud, S.H.R.; Ma, N.L. Preliminary Study on Micropropagation of Hylocereus polyrhizus with Waste Coconut Water and Sucrose. Mater. Sci. Forum 2020, 981, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nilanthi, D.; Yang, Y.S. Effects of sucrose and other additives on in vitro growth and development of purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea L.). Adv. Biol. 2014, 2014, 402309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Mastuti, R.; Munawarti, A.; Rosyidah, M. The effect of tomato juices and bean sprout extracts on vitro shoot regeneration of Physalis angulata L. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1908, 040006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mayo-Mosqueda, A.; Maceda-Lopez, L.F.; Andrade-Canto, S.B.; Noguera-Savelli, E.; Caamal-Velazquez, H.; Cano-Sosa, J.S.; Alatorre-Cobos, F. Efficient protocol for in vitro propagation of Laelia rubescens Lindl. from asymbiotic seed germination. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 133, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mercado, S.A.S.; Delgado, E.A.B. Effect of the medium composition on the asymbiotic germination and in vitro development of the Laeliocattleya hybrid. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 135, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hamdeni, I.; Yangui, I.; Sanaa, A.; Slim, S.; Louhaichi, M.; Messaoud, C.; Boulila, A.; Bettaieb, T. Aloe vera L. (Asphodelaceae): Supplementation of in-vitro culture medium with Aloe vera gel for production of genetically stable plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 147, 1206–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Haque, S.M.; Ghosh, B. High frequency microcloning of Aloe vera and their true-to-type conformity by molecular cytogenetic assessment of two years old field growing regenerated plants. Bot. Stud. 2013, 54, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haque, S.M.; Ghosh, B. Micropropagation, in vitro flowering and cytological studies of Bacopa chamaedryoides, an ethno-medicinal plant. Environ. Exp. Biol. 2013, 11, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mandal, S.; Parsai, A.; Tiwari, P.K.; Nataraj, M. The effect of additional additives on the axillary shoot micropropagation of medicinal plant Aegle marmelos (L.) Corrêa. World News Nat. Sci. 2021, 34, 54–71. [Google Scholar]
  40. Khatri, P.; Rana, J.S.; Sindhu, A.; Jamdagni, P. Effect of additives on enhanced in-vitro shoot multiplication and their functional group identification of Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. Et Fernand. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Samiei, L.; Pahnehkolayi, M.D.; Tehranifar, A.; Karimian, Z. Organic and inorganic elicitors enhance in vitro regeneration of Rosa canina. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jayakumar, S.; Ramalingam, R. Influence of additives on enhanced in vitro shoot multiplication of Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. Not. Sci. Biol. 2013, 5, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. David, D.; Jawan, R.; Marbawi, H.; Gansau, J.A. Organic additives improve the in vitro growth of native orchid Vanda helvola Blume. Not. Sci. Biol. 2015, 7, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Sridhar, T.M.; Aswath, C.R. Influence of additives on enhanced in vitro shoot multiplication of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.)—An important anti diabetic medicinal plant. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Hamdeni, I.; Slim, S.; Sanaa, A.; Louhaichi, M.; Boulila, A.; Bettaieb, T. Rosemary essential oil enhances culture establishment and inhibits contamination and enzymatic browning: Applications for in vitro propagation of Aloe vera L. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 147, 1199–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Taghizadeh, M.; Solgi, M.; Shahrjerdi, I. Various aspects of essential oils application for pathogens controlling in Strawberry in vitro culture. Acad. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 4, 667–674. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jasim, N.S.; Salih, A.M.; Ati, M.A.A. Evaluating the efficiency of plants essential oils against common fungal contamination affecting tissue culture of date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by in vitro culture. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2021, 25, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  48. Taghizadeh, M.; Solgi, M. The Application of essential oils and silver nanoparticles for sterilization of Bermudagrass explants in in vitro culture. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2014, 1, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  49. Flores-López, M.L.; Romaní, A.; Cerqueiraa, M.A.; Rodríguez-García, R.; Jasso de Rodríguez, D.; Vicente, A.A. Compositional features and bioactive properties of whole fraction from Aloe vera processing. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 91, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Banani, D.; Anania, A. Effect of plant growth regulators on in vitro propagation of Tagetes erecta Linn: Review. Indian J. Basic Appl. Med. Res. 2014, 3, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  51. Saad, A.I.M.; Elshahed, A.M. Chapter 2: Plant Tissue Culture Media. In Recent Advances in Plant In Vitro Culture; Intech: London, UK, 2015; pp. 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. El-sharabasy, S.; Issa, F.; Hammad, G.; El-dawayaty, M. Effect of different amino acids at different concentrations on multiplication and rooting stage of in vitro propagation of strawberries (Fragaria x Ananassa duch cv. Chandler). Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 2015, 44, 31–45. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pawar, B.; Kale, P.; Bahurupe, J.; Jadhav, A.; Kale, A.; Pawar, S. Proline and glutamine improve in vitro callus induction and subsequent shooting in rice. Rice Sci. 2015, 22, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Akhtar, G.; Jaskani, M.J.; Sajjad, Y.; Akram, A. Effect of antioxidants, amino acids and plant growth regulators on in vitro propagation of Rosa centifolia. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 14, e1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bindu, B.; Podikunju, B. Tissue culture protocol for in-vitro propagation of papaya (Carica papaya L.). J. Krishi Vigyan 2017, 6, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Greenwell, Z.L.; Ruter, J.M. Effect of glutamine and arginine on growth of Hibiscus moscheutos “in vitro”. Ornam. Hortic. 2018, 24, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Baskaran, P.; Ncube, B.; Van Staden, J. In vitro propagation and secondary product production by Merwilla plumbea (Lindl.) Speta. Plant Growth Regul. 2012, 67, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Deein, W.; Thepsithar, C.; Thongpukdee, A. In vitro culture medium sterilization by chemicals and essential oils without autoclaving and growth of Chrysanthemum nodes. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2013, 7, 407–410. [Google Scholar]
  59. Arneth, A.; Shin, Y.J.; Leadley, P.; Rondinini, C.; Bukvareva, E.; Kolb, M.; Midgley, G.F.; Oberdorff, T.; Palomo, I.; Saito, O. Post-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 30882–30891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Priyanka, V.; Kumar, R.; Dhaliwal, I.; Kaushik, P. Germplasm Conservation: Instrumental in Agricultural Biodiversity—A Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bakhshipour, M.; Mafakheri, M.; Kordrostami, M.; Zakir, A.; Rahimi, N.; Feizi, F.; Mohsen, M. In vitro multiplication, genetic fidelity and phytochemical potentials of Vaccinium arctostaphylos L.: An endangered medicinal plant. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 141, 111812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Azizi, A.A.A.; Roostika, I.; Reflinur; Efendi, D. Analysis of genetic stability of micropropagated sugarcane in different subculture frequencies using SSR marker. Ind. Crops Res. J. 2020, 26, 49–57. [Google Scholar]
  63. Jaiswal, P.; Kumari, N.; Kashyap, S.P.; Tiwari, S.K. Organogenesis from leaf tissue of Spondias pinnata (L. f.) Kurz, SEM study and genetic fidelity assessment by ISSR and ScoT. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 146, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hussien, E.T.; Ahmed, M.F.; Ahmed, E.Z. Biometric measurements and genetic instability assessment of in vitro micro-shoots culture of Populus alba. Plant Physiol. Rep. 2022, 27, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Elyazid, D.M.A.; Salama, A.-M.; Zanaty, A.F.M.E.; Abdalla, N. In vitro propagation and acclimatization of Banana plants: Antioxidant enzymes, chemical assessments and genetic stability of regenerates as a response to copper Sulphate. Plants 2021, 10, 1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bhattacharyya, P.; Kumar, V.; Van Staden, J. Assessment of genetic stability amongst micropropagated Ansellia africana, a vulnerable medicinal orchid species of Africa using SCoT markers. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 108, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, L.; Chao, L.; Su, X.; Wang, C.; Dong, C.; Chen, S. High-frequency in vitro plantlet regeneration in Lilium davidii var. unicolour Salisb, an important edible and medicinal plant, and confrmation of genetic fdelity of regeneration plantlets using ISSR markers. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 15, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nowakowska, K.; Pińkowska, A.; Siedlecka, E.; Pacholczak, A. The effect of cytokinins on shoot proliferation, biochemical changes and genetic stability of Rhododendron ‘Kazimierz Odnowiciel’ in the in vitro cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 149, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bdnarek, P.T.; Pachota, K.A.; Dynkowska, W.M.; Machczyńska, J.; Orłowska, R. Understanding In Vitro Tissue Culture-Induced Variation Phenomenon in Microspore System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bednarek, P.T.; Zebrowski, J.; Orłowska, R. Exploring the Biochemical Origin of DNA Sequence Variation in Barley Plants Regenerated via In Vitro Anther Culture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abdelsalam, A.; Mahran, E.; Chowdhury, K.; Boroujerdi, A. Metabolic profiling, in vitro propagation, and genetic assessment of the endangered rare plant Anarrhinum pubescens. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bradaï, F.; Sánchez-Romero, C.; Martín, C. Somaclonal variation in olive (Olea europaea L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis: Influence of genotype and culture age on genetic stability. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 251, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Samarina, L.; Gvasaliya, M.; Koninskaya, N.; Rakhmangulov, R.; Efremov, A.; Kiselyova, N.; Ryndin, A.; Hanke, M.V. A comparison of genetic stability in tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze] plantlets derived from callus with plantlets from long-term in vitro propagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 138, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, H.; Wang, G.; Qiao, Y.; Chen, C. Plant regeneration from root segments of Anthurium andraeanum and assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro regenerates. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2021, 57, 954–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Erisen, S.; Kurt-Gür, G.; Servi, H. In vitro propagation of Salvia sclarea L. by meta-Topolin, and assessment of genetic stability and secondary metabolite profling of micropropagated plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 157, 112892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kaur, K.; Singh, P.; Kaur, K.; Bhandawat, A.; Nogia, P.; Pati, P.K. Development of robust in vitro culture protocol for the propagation of genetically and phytochemically stable plants of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (Ashwagandha). Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 166, 113428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nazir, R.; Gupta, S.; Dey, A.; Kumar, V.; Yousuf, M.; Hussain, S.; Dwivedi, P.; Pandey, D.K. In vitro propagation and assessment of genetic fidelity in Dioscorea deltoidea, a potent diosgenin yielding endangered plant. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 140, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sandhya, D.; Jogam, P.; Manokari, M.; Shekhawat, M.S.; Jadaun, J.S.; Allini, V.R.; Abbagani, S. High-frequency in vitro propagation and assessment of genetic uniformity and micro-morphological characterization of Origanum majorana L.—A highly traded aromatic herb. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 34, 102024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shaikhaldein, H.O.; Al-Qurainy, F.; Tarroum, M.; Khan, S.; Nadeem, M.; Salih, A.M. Phytochemical analysis of Maerua oblongifolia, and assessment of the genetic stability of M. oblongifolia under in vitro nanoparticles exposure. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Panwar, G.S.; Joshi, B.; Joshi, R. Axenic rhizome culture and genetic fdelity assessment of Eulophia dabia (D. Don) Hochr: An endangered terrestrial orchid species. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2022, 58, 567–576. [Google Scholar]
  81. Thu, H.T.M.; Naing, A.H.; Jeong, H.Y.; Kim, C.K. Regeneration of Genetically Stable Plants from In Vitro Vitrified Leaves of Different Carnation Cultivars. Plants 2020, 9, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Borsai, O.; Hârța, M.; Szabo, K.; Kelemen, C.D.; Andrecan, F.A.; Codrea, M.M.; Clapa, D. Evaluation of genetic fidelity of in vitro-propagated blackberry plants using RAPD and SRAP molecular markers. Hortic. Sci. 2020, 47, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Clapa, D.; Hârța, M. Establishment of an Efficient Micropropagation System for Humulus lupulus L. cv. Cascade and Confirmation of Genetic Uniformity of the Regenerated Plants through DNA Markers. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Rohela, G.K.; Jogam, P.; Yaseen Mir, M.; Ahmad Shabnam, A.; Shukla, P.; Abbagani, S.; NahaidKamili, A. Indirect regeneration and genetic fidelity analysis of acclimated plantlets through SCoT and ISSR markers in Morusalba L. cv. Chinese white. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 25, e00417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ganie, S.H.; Upadhyay, P.; Das, S.; PrasadSharma, M. Authentication of medicinal plants by DNA markers. Plant Gene 2015, 4, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Krishnan, S.R.; Muthuramalingam, P.; Pandian, S.; Banupriya, R.; Chithra, G.; Ramesh, M. Sprouted sorghum extract elicits coleoptile emergence, enhances shoot and root acclimatization, and maintains genetic fidelity in indica rice. Rice Sci. 2018, 25, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Natarajan, N.; Sundararajan, S.; Suresh, C.P. In vitro somatic embryogenesis from immature female flower of Musa AAB cv. Chenichampa and molecular analysis of transcript factors (TFs) during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 143, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Oliya, B.K.; Chand, K.; Thakuri, L.S.; Baniya, M.K.; Sah, A.K.; Pant, B. Assessment of genetic stability of micropropagated plants of Rhynchostylis retusa (L.) using RAPD markers. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 281, 110008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tripathi, M.; Kumari, N.; Jaiswal, V.S.; Jaiswal, U.; Singh, M. Somatic embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos of Sterculia alata Roxb. and monitoring the ontogeny and the genetic fidelity of somatic embryos. Int. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2017, 3, 53–67. [Google Scholar]
  90. Al-Mayahi, A.M.W. The effect of polyamines and silver thiosulphate on micropropagation of Date Palm followed by genetic stability assessment. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gurme, S.T.; Jadhav, P.P.; Pawar, K.D.; Bapat, V.A.; Jadhav, J.P. Somatic embryogenesis and evaluation of genetic fidelity in Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson. J. Crop Improv. 2018, 32, 801–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Suwal, M.M.; Lamichhane, J.; Gauchan, D.P. Assessment of Genetic Stability of Micropropagated Bambusa balcooa Roxb. using RAPD Marker. Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Thakur, M.; Soni, M.; Sharma, D.P.; Vivek, M.; Sharma, V. In vitro propagation of Plum (Prunus salicina) cv. ‘Santa Rosa’and assessment of genetic stability using RAPD markers. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 23, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nandhakumar, N.; Kumar, K.; Sudhakar, D.; Soorianathasundaram, K. Plant regeneration, developmental pattern formation and genetic fidelity of somatic embryogenesis derived Musa spp. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Asadi-Aghbolaghi, M.; Dedicova, B.; Ranade, S.S.; Le, K.C.; Sharifzadeh, F.; Omidi, M.; Egertsdotter, U. Protocol development for somatic embryogenesis, SSR markers and genetic modifcation of Stipagrostis pennata (Trin.) De Winter. Plant Methods 2021, 17, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Pandey, S.; Sundararajan, S.; Ramalingam, S.; Baniya, M.K.; Pant, B. Rapid clonal propagation and valepotriates accumulation in cultures of Valeriana jatamansi Jones, a high-value medicinal plant. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2020, 93, 177–185. [Google Scholar]
  97. Srinivasan, P.; Raja, H.D.; Tamilvanan, R. Efficient in vitro plant regeneration from leaf-derived callus and genetic fidelity assessment of an endemic medicinal plant Ranunculus wallichianus Wight and Arnn by using RAPD and ISSR markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 147, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Vasudevan, V.; Subramanyam, K.; Elayaraja, D.; Karthik, S.; Vasudevan, A.; Manickavasagam, M. Assessment of the efficacy of amino acids and polyamines on regeneration of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.) and analysis of genetic fidelity of regenerated plants by SCoT and RAPD markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 130, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ajithan, C.; Vasudevan, V.; Sathish, D.; Sathish, S.; Krishnan, V.; Manickavasagam, M. The influential role of polyamines on the in vitro regeneration of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and genetic fidelity assessment by SCoT and RAPD markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 139, 547–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Muthukumar, M.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Kumar, T.S.; Rao, M.V. Direct regeneration, microshoot recovery and assessment of genetic fidelity in Helicteres isora L., a medicinally important tree. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 23, 101415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Effect of different organic growth additives on in vitro tissue culture.
Table 1. Effect of different organic growth additives on in vitro tissue culture.
Type of NutrientsSpecies ExplantCulture Media Organic Growth AdditivesMain ResultsReferences
Vegetable, fruit, and plant extractsDaphne sp. (caucasica, tangutica, jasminea)Shoot MSCW: 10 mL/L
PP: 10 mL/L
AAN: 20 mg/L
CHT: 15 mg/L
Desmodesmus subspicatus: 20%, 50%
D. tangutica: Shoot proliferation was improved by medium supplementation with CW and PP (micropropagation coefficient 16.6 and 13.4).
D. caucasica: The highest frequency of adventitious rhizogenesis (57.1%) occurred when tissues were cultured on MS + 10 mL/L PP.
D. jasminea: The rooting percentage was 14% and 8.9% for PP and CW.
[24]
Celosia sp.Stem MSMCJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L
YCJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L
PJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L
BJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L
TJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L
YCJ at 70 mL/L induced the highest shoot regeneration (14.21). BJ and TJ promote the highest shoot regeneration of stem segments at 50 mL/L which produced 9.57 and 9.28 shoots per explant, while PJ, at the lowest concentration (20 mL/L), showed the highest shoot regeneration (10.5).[25]
Raphunus sativusHypocotylMSCW: 20%,
CM: 20%,
GSL: 10%,
GPT: 10%,
GC: 10%,
RF: 5%,
GG: 10%,
GP: 10%,
BF: 10%,
OJ: 10%
The highest number of shoots (12 shoots/explant) was observed in MS supplemented with 2.5 mg/L BAP + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 10% OJ, whereas 8 shoots/explant were obtained with 20% CW. Media with GSL, RF, GG, GPT, and BJ inhibit shoot regeneration.[14]
Epidendrum nocturnumPBLsOSMBW: 10 g/L
CW: 10 mL/L
5 g/L BW +
5 mL/L CW
PD: 10 g/L
Media with 5 g/L BW + 5 mL/L CW showed greater plant length (19.80 mm), the number of roots (2.1), and fresh weight (0.08 g). [16]
Cypripedium macranthosPLBs¼ MSCW: 50, 100, 200 mL/L
BSP: 50, 100, 200 mL/L
MSP: 50, 100, 200 mL/L
BW: 15, 30, 60 g/L
P: 1, 2, 4 g/L
The highest germination and protocorm formation percentages (70.8% and 74.2%) were obtained with 100 mL/L CW. [15]
Dendrobium lowiProtocormsKCCW: 10%, 15%, 20%
TJ: 10%, 15%, 20%
BP: 25, 75, 125 g/L
P: 2 g/L
Protocorm treated with 25 g/L BP showed the highest GI values of 593.3 with 100% protocorms successfully developing shoots and 93.3% of protocorms producing root. [26]
Musa cv. Rajabulu Shoots MSCW: 50, 100, 150, 200 mL/LThe supplementation of CW (50 and 100 mL/L) showed the best results on the average number of roots (9.33, 9.00) and root length (11.6, 10.76 cm). Acclimatization succeeded (100%) with CW (50 to 200 mL/L).[27]
Musa acuminataShoot MSCW: 200 mL/L
PPJ: 200 mL/L
OJ: 200 mL/L
MS supplemented with 200 mL/L CW resulted in the highest number of shoots/explant (1.71), the longest shoot length (4.25 cm), and the highest number of leaves/explant (4). [18]
Dendrobium chryseumProtocorms½ MSCW: 5%, 10%The highest number of shoots developed on ½ MS fortified with 2 mg/L Kn + 10% CW and the longest shoots were obtained on ½ MS + 1 mg/L GA3 + 10% CW. [28]
Dianthus caryophyllusShoot tip NodeMS CW: 5%, 8%, 10%, 15%, 20%The best regeneration was obtained on MS supplemented with 1 mg/L BAP +10% CW which increased the number of shoots per culture (nodal explant:113.83 and, shoot tip explant: 93.33).[29]
Gastrochilus matsuranPLBs½ MSCW: 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10% When 5% CW was added to ½ MS + 0.05% AC + 1% BP + 0.2% P + 1 µM NAA + 1.5 µM GA3. It produced the highest germination percentage at 93.3%. [30]
Hylocereus polyrhizusStem MSMCW: 2%, 4%, 6%Adding 4% MCW and 3% sucrose in MS media increased the shoot elongation (2.45 cm). [31]
Echinacea purpureaPetiole MSLH: 100, 300, 900 mg/L
P: 100, 300, 900 mg/L
Y: 100, 300, 900 mg/L
CW: 2%, 4%, 8%
Shoot multiplication has been enhanced with 2% CW on MS containing 0.3 mg/L BA + 0.01 mg/L NAA (2.58 buds/explant). [32]
Physalis angulataNode MSTJ: 5%, 7.5%, 10%
B: 1.25%, 2.5%, 3.75%
The maximum shoot number (12.5) was produced in MS + 2 mg/L BAP + 0.05 mg/L IAA + 5% TJ while the maximum shoot length (10.7 cm) was obtained with 7.5% TJ. [33]
Laelia rubescensPLBsPhy
MS
½ MS
CW: 100 mL/L
PJ: 100 mL/L
Phy media supplemented with 100 mL/L PJ resulted in the highest seedling height (1.31 cm), number of leaves per seedling (3.33), and roots (2.33) [34]
xLaeliocattleyaPLBsOSM
MS
CW: 200 mL/L
PJ: 200 mL/L
MS supplemented with PJ produced the highest results in asymbiotic germination (56%) and seedlings formation (25.8). [35]
Aloe veraShoot tipShoot multiplication:
MS
AvG: 2.5%, 5%, 10%Adding AvG to MS media increased the number of axillary shoots compared to the control. The highest axillary shoot number was recorded on a medium containing 5% AvG (13.27) and the highest shoot elongation (2.5 cm) was recorded on a medium supplemented with 2.5% AvG.[36]
Rooting:
½ MS
AvG: 10%, 20%, 30%The highest root number and the greatest root length (5.73 and 5.90 cm) were recorded on MS medium supplemented with 10% AvG.
Aloe veraRhizomatous stemShoot multiplication:
MS
AvG: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%The highest number of formed shoots per explant (length ≥ 2 cm) was 17.8 shoots on MS medium supplemented with 10% AvG.[37]
Rooting:
⅓ MS
AvG: 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%Adding AvG (20% and 30%) to ⅓ MS increased the rooting response to 100%, the number of roots per shoot (9.8 and 9.2), and the length of the roots (3.1 and 2.8).
Bacopa chamaedryoidesShoot tip, nodesRooting:
½ MS
AvG: 50% The best rooting response (100%), number (18.3), and length of shoots (2.3 cm) were achieved on ½ MS supplemented with 50% AvG. [38]
Amino acids, polyamines, and proteinsAegle marmelosNodes, internodes, shoot tip, leaves MS Amino acids (Met, Glu, Gly, Trp, Pro, Lys, Arg, Gln): 10, 20, 30, 40 mg/LMS medium containing 2 mg/L BAP and a combination of all amino acids in 20 mg/L obtained the optimum axillary shoot proliferation response (100%) and average shoot numbers per explant (2.22). [39]
Chlorophytum borivilianumNode Shoot morphogenesis:
MS
Ads: 10, 20 mg/L
CH: 10, 20, 30 mg/L
PU: 0, 10, 30, 50, 70, 100 mg/L
The best response for shoot morphogenesis (96.67%) was achieved on MS supplemented with 2 mg/L BAP + 1 mg/L NAA + 20 mg/L Ads.[40]
Rooting:
½ MS
PU: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 mg/L ½ MS with IBA (2 mg/L) + PU (9 mg/L) was best for rooting with 83.33% root induction.
Rosa caninaNode VSCH: 200, 400, 600 mg/L
Glu: 2, 4, 8, 12 mg/L
Pro: 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 mg/L
The maximum shoot number (4.1 shoots/explant) was obtained in VS supplemented with 600 mg/L CH. Glu at 12 mg/L enhanced shoot regeneration and leaf number compared to the control.[41]
Orthosiphon aristatusNode MSP: 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/L,
Asn: 10, 20, 30, 40 mg/L
Gln:10, 20, 30, 40 mg/L
WJ: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%
CW: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%
CW (10%) + Gln: 20, 30 mg/L
CW (10%) + Asn: 20, 30 mg/L
MS supplemented with 1 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L KIN + 10% CW and Gln or Asn increased the number of shoots/explant. Gln at 30 mg/L produced 44.04 shoots/explant with a mean length of 7.47 cm, whereas 20 mg/L Asn resulted in 40.43 shoots/explant and 6.89 cm shoot length after 8 weeks of culture.[42]
Vanda helvolaProtocormsKCTJ: 10%, 20%, 40%
CW: 10%, 20%, 40%
P: 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4%
YE: 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4%
Protocorms (99.50%) treated in KC containing 0.1% P successfully produced 3.10 leaves with an average length of 10.97 mm per responsive explant after 90 days of culture.[43]
Stevia rebaudianaNode MSCH: 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1%
CW: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%
ME: 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1%
YE: 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1%
MS supplemented with 2 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L Kin + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 0.05% CH resulted in a maximum of 15 shoots. A 90% regeneration frequency and shoot length of 6 cm were recorded per explant.[44]
Essential oilsAloe veraShoot tipMSAC: 0.5 g/L
T. vulgaris EO: 0.1%, 0.2%
R. officinalis EO: 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1%
Explant survival was 100% after 4 weeks of culture with R. officinalis EO concentrations of 0.05%, 0.075%, and 0.1% with no signs of browning. The lowest infection percentage (10%) was observed for media containing 0.075% and 0.1% of R. officinalis EO. The highest number of leaves per explant was 3.71 with 0.1% R. officinalis EO and the greatest leaf length was 3.18 cm with 0.05%.[45]
Fragaria × ananassa (Duch)LeavesMSEugenol: 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.5%, 2.5%, 5%
Carvacrol: 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.5%, 2.5%, 5%
Thymol: 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.5%, 2.5%, 5%
All essential oil treatments resulted in sterile conditions of the medium. The growth of in vitro contaminations from fungi and bacteria was inhibited at 0.01% and 0.5% concentrations, respectively.[46]
Phoenix DactyliferaNodeMSMentha piperita: 2%
Thymus vulgaris: 2%
Cinnamomum camphora: 2%
All the essential oils inhibited the mycelial growth and fungus contamination of tissue culture. [47]
Cynodon dactylonNodeMSThymol: 100, 200 mg/L
(30, 60, and 120 min soaking time)
Carvacrol:100, 200 mg/L
(30, 60, and 120 min soaking time)
Increasing the period of exposure (60–120 min) with thymol and carvacrol at 200 mg/L led to the appropriate control of fungi and bacterial infection of explants.[48]
Table 2. Molecular markers used for genetic stability assessment of in vitro propagated plants under organic growth addition.
Table 2. Molecular markers used for genetic stability assessment of in vitro propagated plants under organic growth addition.
Molecular MarkerSpeciesOrganic Growth AdditivesMain ResultsReferences
RAPDSterculia alataPro: 50, 100, 200, 300, 400 mg/L
Gln: 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 mg/L
The optimum development and maturation of somatic embryos were observed by the supplementation of 400 mg/L Gln.
All 25 RAPD primers generated distinct amplification profiles with the same banding pattern of all the samples. The total number of amplification products was 181 bands with an average of 7.24 bands per primer.
[89]
Phoenix dactyliferaPU: 25, 75, 150 mg/L
Spd: 25, 75, 150 mg/L
The two types of polyamines (PU and Spd) at 75 mg/L each, were the most effective treatments in root formation and number.
All four RAPD primers showed unambiguous amplifications with monomorphic bands among both in vitro-derived plants and the mother plant.
[90]
Amorphophallus paeoniifoliusCW: 15%
Gln: 1.36, 3.42 µM
CH: 0.05%
MS medium supplemented with 15% CW in combination with 4.43 µM BAP resulted in the best shooting frequency (90%) and plant number (18).
Among 10 RAPD primers tested, only 6 generated a total of 292 bands without any polymorphic bands between 10 in vitro regenerants and their mother plant.
[91]
Bambusa balcooaAvLE: 1%The addition of 1% AvLE to MS liquid media has fully controlled culture contamination and enhanced shoot number and length.
Out of 20 RAPD primers, only 8 primers yielded 22.44 reproducible and scorable bands with 2.8 bands per primer ranging in size from 100 to 1800 bp. All amplified bands were monomorphic across the in vitro-raised plants and their mother plant.
[92]
Rhynchostylis retusaCW: 5%, 10%
Fungal elicitors isolated from Vanda cristata
The highest shoot number and length were found on MS medium supplemented with 10% CW, while a fungal elicitor showed the best response for root number and length.
All RAPD primers (10) produced 23 amplification bands ranging in size from 275 to 1100 bp. Genetic uniformity among in vitro cultured plants and the mother plant was maintained.
[88]
Prunus salicinaCH: 10, 50, 100 mg/L CH (at 10 mg/L) resulted in the best multiplication rate (5.08) and shoot elongation with an average shoot length of 2.94 cm.
Out of 16 RAPD primers tested, 14 primers produced 43 amplification fragments ranging from 200 to 1500 bp in size. All banding profiles were monomorphic across all of the tested plants and similar to those of the mother plant.
[93]
ISSR Musa spp.
(Cultivars Grand Naine and Rasthali)
Pro: 100, 200, 300, 400 mg/L
Gln: 100, 200, 300, 400 mg/L
Asn: 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/L
Gln (400 mg/L) significantly enhanced the number of both primary (1680, 1850) and secondary (3597, 3270) somatic embryos per culture from Grand Naine and Rasthali cultivars, respectively.
All 10 ISSR primers generated a total of 1534 and 1488 bands ranging from 200 bp to 2500 bp in size in Grand Naine and Rasthali cultivars, respectively, giving rise to only monomorphic bands across all the tested plants in both cultivars.
[94]
SSRMusa AAB cultivar ChenichampaME: 100 mg/L
YE: 100 mg/L
CH: 50, 100, 150 mg/L
Gln: 50, 100, 150 mg/L
The highest somatic embryo induction (85%) was observed when CH (100 mg/L) and Gln (150 mg/L) were supplemented to the media as compared to the control.
No somaclonal variations were detected using 10 SSR primers among the embryogenic cell suspension-derived plants and their mother plant.
[87]
Stipagrostis pennataGln: 500 mg/L
CH: 100 mg/L
The highest embryogenic callus induction was observed when Gln and CH were supplemented to the culture media.
In total, 10 SSR primes were tested, out of which 4 primers showed a single amplification band size of 185, 412, 243, and 210 bp for primers 1, 3, 7, and 8, respectively.
[95]
RAPD and ISSR Oryza sativaSSE: 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%The SSE supplementation in a dose-dependent manner resulted in the highest shoot, root length, and root biomass.
Only 2 RAPD (out of 6) and 4 ISSR (out of 11) primers produced stable amplicons with 11 and 26 monomorphic amplicons, respectively.
[86]
Valeriana jatamansiCW: 10%The supplementation of 10% CW resulted in the maximum response with regard to shoot and root numbers and lengths (13 cm, 19.6 cm, 6 cm, and 7.5 cm, respectively).
Out of the 35 RAPD and 10 ISSR primers analyzed, only 10 RAPD and 5 ISSR primers produced a total of 32 and 12 similar banding patterns between the in vitro raised plantlets and the mother plant, respectively.
[96]
Ranunculus wallichianusCW: 10% MS medium supplemented with 10% CW resulted in the highest regeneration response (97%), number of shoot formations (11.1 shoots/culture), and shoot length (9.2 cm).
In total, 9 RAPD and 8 ISSR primers produced 56 and 47 bands with an average of 6 and 5 bands per primer ranging from 200 to 1500 bp and 200 to 1000 bp in size, respectively.
[97]
RAPD and SCoTCitrullus lanatusSpd: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mg/L
Spm: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mg/L
PU: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mg/L
Spd (10 mg/L) increased shoot induction response (93%), shoot number (46.43 shoots per explant), and shoot elongation (6.3 cm). PU (10 mg/L) showed the highest rooting percentage (95%) with the production of 23.03 roots per shoot measuring 4.32 cm in length
In total, 9 RAPD and 17 SCoT primers produced 41 and 47 monomorphic fragments in the size range of 200–1800 and 300 to 2000 bp, respectively.
[98]
Pisum sativumSpd: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mg/L
Spm: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mg/L
PU: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mg/L
The highest multiple shoots number (65.1 shoots/explant) was attained with 20 mg/L SPD while 30 mg/L PU produced the highest number of roots (33.66 roots/shoot).
In total, 9 RAPD and 17 SCoT primers produced 34 and 38 monomorphic fragments with the ranges of 400 to 600 and 100 to 500 bp, respectively.
[99]
ISSR and SCoT Helicteres isoraGln: 25, 50, 75, 100 mg/L
SC: 10, 20, 30, 40 mg/L
Gln (50 mg/L) produced the highest shoot number (21.3, 16.9) from both cotyledonary node and axillary node explants, respectively.
In total, 5 ISSR primers (out of 10), produced 27 reproducible bands with 5.4 bands per primer varying in size from 0.3 to 2.2 kb.
Out of the 17 SCoT primers tried, 13 primers produced 63 monomorphic bands with 4.8 bands per primer ranging in size from 0.3 to 3 kb.
In both ISSR and SCoT techniques, all the resolved bands were monomorphic to all in vitro regenerated plants as well as their in vivo-based mother plant.
[100]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hamdeni, I.; Louhaichi, M.; Slim, S.; Boulila, A.; Bettaieb, T. Incorporation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Tissue Culture for Producing Genetically Stable Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223087

AMA Style

Hamdeni I, Louhaichi M, Slim S, Boulila A, Bettaieb T. Incorporation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Tissue Culture for Producing Genetically Stable Plants. Plants. 2022; 11(22):3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223087

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hamdeni, Imtinene, Mounir Louhaichi, Slim Slim, Abdennacer Boulila, and Taoufik Bettaieb. 2022. "Incorporation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Tissue Culture for Producing Genetically Stable Plants" Plants 11, no. 22: 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223087

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop