Incorporation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Tissue Culture for Producing Genetically Stable Plants
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Supplementation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Culture Techniques
2.1. Vegetable, Fruit, and Plant Extracts
2.2. Amino Acids, Polyamines, and Proteins
2.3. Essential Oils
3. Marker-Assisted Genetic Stability Assay
3.1. RAPD Analysis
3.2. ISSR Analysis
3.3. SSR Analysis
3.4. Combined Markers Analysis (RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT)
3.4.1. RAPD and ISSR Analysis
3.4.2. RAPD and SCoT Analysis
3.4.3. ISSR and SCoT Analysis
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
References
- Ouled Belgacem, A.; Louhaichi, M. The vulnerability of native rangeland plant species to global climate change in the West Asia and North African regions. Clim. Chang. 2013, 119, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hudson, L.N.; Newbold, T.; Contu, S.; Hill, S.L.L.; Lysenko, I.; De Palma, A.; Phillips, H.R.P.; Senior, R.A.; Bennett, D.J.; Booth, H.; et al. The PREDICTS database: A global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4, 4701–4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pedrini, S.; Gibson-Roy, P.; Trivedi, C.; Gálvez-Ramírez, C.; Hardwick, K.; Shaw, N.; Frischie, S.; Laverack, G.; Dixon, K. Ecological Restoration Collection and production of native seeds for ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2020, 28, S228–S238. [Google Scholar]
- Baughman, B.O.W.; Kulpa, S.M.; Sheley, R.L. Four paths toward realizing the full potential of using native plants during ecosystem restoration in the Intermountain West. Rangelands 2022, 44, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Carlo, A.; Tarraf, W.; Lambardi, M.; Benelli, C. Temporary Immersion System for Production of Biomass and Bioactive Compounds from Medicinal Plants. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louhaichi, M.; Gamoun, M.; Ben Salem, F.; Ouled Belgacem, A. Rangeland Biodiversity and Climate Variability: Supporting the Need for Flexible Grazing Management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yirdaw, E.; Tigabu, M.; Monge, A. Rehabilitation of degraded dryland ecosystems—Review. Silva Fenn. 2017, 51, 1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hameg, R.; Arteta, T.A.; Landin, M.; Gallego, P.P.; Barreal, M.E. Modeling and optimizing culture medium mineral composition for in vitro propagation of Actinidia arguta. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 554905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chimdessa, E. Composition and preparation of plant tissue culture medium. J. Tissue Cult. Bioeng. 2020, 3, 281–286. [Google Scholar]
- Khorsha, S.; Alizadeh, M.; Mashayekhi, K. The usefulness of apricot gum as an organic additive in grapevine tissue culture media. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 30, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
- Häkkinen, S.T.; Reuter, L.; Nuorti, N.; Joensuu, J.J.; Rischer, H.; Ritala, A. Tobacco BY-2 media component optimization for a cost-effcient recombinant protein production. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Moraes, M.C.; Camolesi, M.R.; Palmieri, D.A.; Bertão, M.R. Commercial fertilizers and organic additives in orchid micropropagation. Plant Cell Cult. Micropropag. 2020, 16, e162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Häkkinen, S.T.; Nygren, H.; Nohynek, L.; Pimiä, R.P.; Heiniö, R.L.; Maiorova, N.; Rischer, H.; Ritala, A. Plant cell cultures as food—Aspects of sustainability and safety. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 1655–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manawadu, I.; Dahanayake, N.; Senanayake, S.G.N. Effects of different natural organic additives on in vitro shoot regeneration of Raphanus sativus L. var. beeralu. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 219–223. [Google Scholar]
- Huh, Y.S.; Lee, J.K.; Nam, S.Y.; Paek, K.Y.; Suh, G.U. Improvement of asymbiotic seed germination and seedling development of Cypripedium macranthos Sw. with organic additives. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Stefano, D.; Costa, B.N.S.; Downing, J.; Fallahi, E.; Khoddamzadeh, A.A. In-vitro micropropagation and acclimatization of an endangered native orchid using organic supplements. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 380–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, K.; Zeng, S.; Lin, D.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A.; Bu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Duan, J. In vitro propagation and reintroduction of the endangered Renanthera imschootiana Rolfe. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Selakorn, O.; Phasinam, K.; Kassanuk, T.; Sutaphan, S. Influence of organic additives on multiple shoot formation of Musa (AA Group) ‘Kluai Nam Thai’ in vitro. Rajabhat J. Sci. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2020, 21, 347–353. [Google Scholar]
- Thejaswini, R.; Narasimhan, S. Undefined organic additives stimulate in vitro seed germination of Dendrobium Ovatum (willd.) Kraenzl, a medicinal orchid. Int. J. Pharma Med. Biol. Sci. 2017, 6, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatachalam, P.; Kalaiarasi, K.; Sreeramanan, S. Influence of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and various additives on in vitro plant propagation of Bambusa arundinacea (Retz.) Wild: A recalcitrant bamboo species. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2015, 13, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Utami, E.S.W.; Hariyanto, S.; Manuhara, Y.S.W. In vitro propagation of the endangered medicinal orchid, Dendrobium lasianthera J.J.Sm through mature seed culture. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017, 7, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahara, M.; Datta, A.; Boonkorkaew, P.; Mishra, A. The effects of different media, sucrose concentrations and natural additives on plantlet growth of Phalaenopsis hybrid ‘Pink’. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2017, 60, e160149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaur, S.; Bhutani, K.K. Organic growth supplement stimulants for in vitro multiplication of Cymbidium pendulum (Roxb.) Sw. Hortic. Sci. 2012, 39, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiszniewska, A.; Fajerska, E.H.; Grabski, K.; Tukaj, Z. Promoting effects of organic medium supplements on the micropropagation of promising ornamental Daphne species (Thymelaeaceae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2013, 49, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daud, N.; Taha, R.M.; Noor, N.N.M.; Alimon, H. Effects of different organic additives on in vitro shoot regeneration of Celosia sp. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 14, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gansau, J.A.; Indan, H.; Abdullah, S.N.; David, D.; Marbawi, H.; Jawan, R. Effects of organic additives and plant growth regulators on protocorm development of Dendrobium lowii. Trans. Sci. Technol. 2016, 3, 462–468. [Google Scholar]
- Mardhikasari, S.; Yunus, A.; Samanhudi, S. Modification of media for banana in vitro propagation with foliar fertilizer and coconut water in cv. Rajabulu. Caraka Tani J. Sustain. Agric. 2020, 35, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maharjan, S.; Thakuri, L.S.; Thapa, B.B.; Pradhan, S.; Pant, K.K.; Joshi, G.P.; Pant, B. In vitro propagation of the endangered orchid Dendrobium chryseum Rolfe from protocorms culture. Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 2020, 19, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatun, M.; Roy, P.K.; Razzak, M.A. Additive effect of coconut water with various hormones on in vitro regeneration of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2018, 28, 589–596. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, H.; Kang, K.W.; Kim, D.H.; Sivanesan, I. In vitro propagation of Gastrochilus matsuran (Makino) Schltr., an endangered epiphytic orchid. Plants 2020, 9, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ng, Z.C.; Tan, S.H.; Shiekh Mahmud, S.H.R.; Ma, N.L. Preliminary Study on Micropropagation of Hylocereus polyrhizus with Waste Coconut Water and Sucrose. Mater. Sci. Forum 2020, 981, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nilanthi, D.; Yang, Y.S. Effects of sucrose and other additives on in vitro growth and development of purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea L.). Adv. Biol. 2014, 2014, 402309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mastuti, R.; Munawarti, A.; Rosyidah, M. The effect of tomato juices and bean sprout extracts on vitro shoot regeneration of Physalis angulata L. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1908, 040006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayo-Mosqueda, A.; Maceda-Lopez, L.F.; Andrade-Canto, S.B.; Noguera-Savelli, E.; Caamal-Velazquez, H.; Cano-Sosa, J.S.; Alatorre-Cobos, F. Efficient protocol for in vitro propagation of Laelia rubescens Lindl. from asymbiotic seed germination. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 133, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mercado, S.A.S.; Delgado, E.A.B. Effect of the medium composition on the asymbiotic germination and in vitro development of the Laeliocattleya hybrid. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 135, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdeni, I.; Yangui, I.; Sanaa, A.; Slim, S.; Louhaichi, M.; Messaoud, C.; Boulila, A.; Bettaieb, T. Aloe vera L. (Asphodelaceae): Supplementation of in-vitro culture medium with Aloe vera gel for production of genetically stable plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 147, 1206–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haque, S.M.; Ghosh, B. High frequency microcloning of Aloe vera and their true-to-type conformity by molecular cytogenetic assessment of two years old field growing regenerated plants. Bot. Stud. 2013, 54, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haque, S.M.; Ghosh, B. Micropropagation, in vitro flowering and cytological studies of Bacopa chamaedryoides, an ethno-medicinal plant. Environ. Exp. Biol. 2013, 11, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
- Mandal, S.; Parsai, A.; Tiwari, P.K.; Nataraj, M. The effect of additional additives on the axillary shoot micropropagation of medicinal plant Aegle marmelos (L.) Corrêa. World News Nat. Sci. 2021, 34, 54–71. [Google Scholar]
- Khatri, P.; Rana, J.S.; Sindhu, A.; Jamdagni, P. Effect of additives on enhanced in-vitro shoot multiplication and their functional group identification of Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. Et Fernand. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Samiei, L.; Pahnehkolayi, M.D.; Tehranifar, A.; Karimian, Z. Organic and inorganic elicitors enhance in vitro regeneration of Rosa canina. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayakumar, S.; Ramalingam, R. Influence of additives on enhanced in vitro shoot multiplication of Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. Not. Sci. Biol. 2013, 5, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- David, D.; Jawan, R.; Marbawi, H.; Gansau, J.A. Organic additives improve the in vitro growth of native orchid Vanda helvola Blume. Not. Sci. Biol. 2015, 7, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sridhar, T.M.; Aswath, C.R. Influence of additives on enhanced in vitro shoot multiplication of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.)—An important anti diabetic medicinal plant. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hamdeni, I.; Slim, S.; Sanaa, A.; Louhaichi, M.; Boulila, A.; Bettaieb, T. Rosemary essential oil enhances culture establishment and inhibits contamination and enzymatic browning: Applications for in vitro propagation of Aloe vera L. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 147, 1199–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taghizadeh, M.; Solgi, M.; Shahrjerdi, I. Various aspects of essential oils application for pathogens controlling in Strawberry in vitro culture. Acad. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 4, 667–674. [Google Scholar]
- Jasim, N.S.; Salih, A.M.; Ati, M.A.A. Evaluating the efficiency of plants essential oils against common fungal contamination affecting tissue culture of date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by in vitro culture. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2021, 25, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
- Taghizadeh, M.; Solgi, M. The Application of essential oils and silver nanoparticles for sterilization of Bermudagrass explants in in vitro culture. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2014, 1, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
- Flores-López, M.L.; Romaní, A.; Cerqueiraa, M.A.; Rodríguez-García, R.; Jasso de Rodríguez, D.; Vicente, A.A. Compositional features and bioactive properties of whole fraction from Aloe vera processing. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 91, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Banani, D.; Anania, A. Effect of plant growth regulators on in vitro propagation of Tagetes erecta Linn: Review. Indian J. Basic Appl. Med. Res. 2014, 3, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
- Saad, A.I.M.; Elshahed, A.M. Chapter 2: Plant Tissue Culture Media. In Recent Advances in Plant In Vitro Culture; Intech: London, UK, 2015; pp. 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- El-sharabasy, S.; Issa, F.; Hammad, G.; El-dawayaty, M. Effect of different amino acids at different concentrations on multiplication and rooting stage of in vitro propagation of strawberries (Fragaria x Ananassa duch cv. Chandler). Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 2015, 44, 31–45. [Google Scholar]
- Pawar, B.; Kale, P.; Bahurupe, J.; Jadhav, A.; Kale, A.; Pawar, S. Proline and glutamine improve in vitro callus induction and subsequent shooting in rice. Rice Sci. 2015, 22, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Akhtar, G.; Jaskani, M.J.; Sajjad, Y.; Akram, A. Effect of antioxidants, amino acids and plant growth regulators on in vitro propagation of Rosa centifolia. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 14, e1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bindu, B.; Podikunju, B. Tissue culture protocol for in-vitro propagation of papaya (Carica papaya L.). J. Krishi Vigyan 2017, 6, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenwell, Z.L.; Ruter, J.M. Effect of glutamine and arginine on growth of Hibiscus moscheutos “in vitro”. Ornam. Hortic. 2018, 24, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baskaran, P.; Ncube, B.; Van Staden, J. In vitro propagation and secondary product production by Merwilla plumbea (Lindl.) Speta. Plant Growth Regul. 2012, 67, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deein, W.; Thepsithar, C.; Thongpukdee, A. In vitro culture medium sterilization by chemicals and essential oils without autoclaving and growth of Chrysanthemum nodes. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2013, 7, 407–410. [Google Scholar]
- Arneth, A.; Shin, Y.J.; Leadley, P.; Rondinini, C.; Bukvareva, E.; Kolb, M.; Midgley, G.F.; Oberdorff, T.; Palomo, I.; Saito, O. Post-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 30882–30891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priyanka, V.; Kumar, R.; Dhaliwal, I.; Kaushik, P. Germplasm Conservation: Instrumental in Agricultural Biodiversity—A Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakhshipour, M.; Mafakheri, M.; Kordrostami, M.; Zakir, A.; Rahimi, N.; Feizi, F.; Mohsen, M. In vitro multiplication, genetic fidelity and phytochemical potentials of Vaccinium arctostaphylos L.: An endangered medicinal plant. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 141, 111812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azizi, A.A.A.; Roostika, I.; Reflinur; Efendi, D. Analysis of genetic stability of micropropagated sugarcane in different subculture frequencies using SSR marker. Ind. Crops Res. J. 2020, 26, 49–57. [Google Scholar]
- Jaiswal, P.; Kumari, N.; Kashyap, S.P.; Tiwari, S.K. Organogenesis from leaf tissue of Spondias pinnata (L. f.) Kurz, SEM study and genetic fidelity assessment by ISSR and ScoT. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 146, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussien, E.T.; Ahmed, M.F.; Ahmed, E.Z. Biometric measurements and genetic instability assessment of in vitro micro-shoots culture of Populus alba. Plant Physiol. Rep. 2022, 27, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elyazid, D.M.A.; Salama, A.-M.; Zanaty, A.F.M.E.; Abdalla, N. In vitro propagation and acclimatization of Banana plants: Antioxidant enzymes, chemical assessments and genetic stability of regenerates as a response to copper Sulphate. Plants 2021, 10, 1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhattacharyya, P.; Kumar, V.; Van Staden, J. Assessment of genetic stability amongst micropropagated Ansellia africana, a vulnerable medicinal orchid species of Africa using SCoT markers. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 108, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Chao, L.; Su, X.; Wang, C.; Dong, C.; Chen, S. High-frequency in vitro plantlet regeneration in Lilium davidii var. unicolour Salisb, an important edible and medicinal plant, and confrmation of genetic fdelity of regeneration plantlets using ISSR markers. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 15, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowakowska, K.; Pińkowska, A.; Siedlecka, E.; Pacholczak, A. The effect of cytokinins on shoot proliferation, biochemical changes and genetic stability of Rhododendron ‘Kazimierz Odnowiciel’ in the in vitro cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 149, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bdnarek, P.T.; Pachota, K.A.; Dynkowska, W.M.; Machczyńska, J.; Orłowska, R. Understanding In Vitro Tissue Culture-Induced Variation Phenomenon in Microspore System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednarek, P.T.; Zebrowski, J.; Orłowska, R. Exploring the Biochemical Origin of DNA Sequence Variation in Barley Plants Regenerated via In Vitro Anther Culture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelsalam, A.; Mahran, E.; Chowdhury, K.; Boroujerdi, A. Metabolic profiling, in vitro propagation, and genetic assessment of the endangered rare plant Anarrhinum pubescens. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2021, 19, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradaï, F.; Sánchez-Romero, C.; Martín, C. Somaclonal variation in olive (Olea europaea L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis: Influence of genotype and culture age on genetic stability. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 251, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samarina, L.; Gvasaliya, M.; Koninskaya, N.; Rakhmangulov, R.; Efremov, A.; Kiselyova, N.; Ryndin, A.; Hanke, M.V. A comparison of genetic stability in tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze] plantlets derived from callus with plantlets from long-term in vitro propagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 138, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Wang, G.; Qiao, Y.; Chen, C. Plant regeneration from root segments of Anthurium andraeanum and assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro regenerates. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2021, 57, 954–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erisen, S.; Kurt-Gür, G.; Servi, H. In vitro propagation of Salvia sclarea L. by meta-Topolin, and assessment of genetic stability and secondary metabolite profling of micropropagated plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 157, 112892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, K.; Singh, P.; Kaur, K.; Bhandawat, A.; Nogia, P.; Pati, P.K. Development of robust in vitro culture protocol for the propagation of genetically and phytochemically stable plants of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal (Ashwagandha). Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 166, 113428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazir, R.; Gupta, S.; Dey, A.; Kumar, V.; Yousuf, M.; Hussain, S.; Dwivedi, P.; Pandey, D.K. In vitro propagation and assessment of genetic fidelity in Dioscorea deltoidea, a potent diosgenin yielding endangered plant. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 140, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sandhya, D.; Jogam, P.; Manokari, M.; Shekhawat, M.S.; Jadaun, J.S.; Allini, V.R.; Abbagani, S. High-frequency in vitro propagation and assessment of genetic uniformity and micro-morphological characterization of Origanum majorana L.—A highly traded aromatic herb. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 34, 102024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaikhaldein, H.O.; Al-Qurainy, F.; Tarroum, M.; Khan, S.; Nadeem, M.; Salih, A.M. Phytochemical analysis of Maerua oblongifolia, and assessment of the genetic stability of M. oblongifolia under in vitro nanoparticles exposure. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panwar, G.S.; Joshi, B.; Joshi, R. Axenic rhizome culture and genetic fdelity assessment of Eulophia dabia (D. Don) Hochr: An endangered terrestrial orchid species. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2022, 58, 567–576. [Google Scholar]
- Thu, H.T.M.; Naing, A.H.; Jeong, H.Y.; Kim, C.K. Regeneration of Genetically Stable Plants from In Vitro Vitrified Leaves of Different Carnation Cultivars. Plants 2020, 9, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borsai, O.; Hârța, M.; Szabo, K.; Kelemen, C.D.; Andrecan, F.A.; Codrea, M.M.; Clapa, D. Evaluation of genetic fidelity of in vitro-propagated blackberry plants using RAPD and SRAP molecular markers. Hortic. Sci. 2020, 47, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clapa, D.; Hârța, M. Establishment of an Efficient Micropropagation System for Humulus lupulus L. cv. Cascade and Confirmation of Genetic Uniformity of the Regenerated Plants through DNA Markers. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohela, G.K.; Jogam, P.; Yaseen Mir, M.; Ahmad Shabnam, A.; Shukla, P.; Abbagani, S.; NahaidKamili, A. Indirect regeneration and genetic fidelity analysis of acclimated plantlets through SCoT and ISSR markers in Morusalba L. cv. Chinese white. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 25, e00417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ganie, S.H.; Upadhyay, P.; Das, S.; PrasadSharma, M. Authentication of medicinal plants by DNA markers. Plant Gene 2015, 4, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Krishnan, S.R.; Muthuramalingam, P.; Pandian, S.; Banupriya, R.; Chithra, G.; Ramesh, M. Sprouted sorghum extract elicits coleoptile emergence, enhances shoot and root acclimatization, and maintains genetic fidelity in indica rice. Rice Sci. 2018, 25, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natarajan, N.; Sundararajan, S.; Suresh, C.P. In vitro somatic embryogenesis from immature female flower of Musa AAB cv. Chenichampa and molecular analysis of transcript factors (TFs) during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 143, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliya, B.K.; Chand, K.; Thakuri, L.S.; Baniya, M.K.; Sah, A.K.; Pant, B. Assessment of genetic stability of micropropagated plants of Rhynchostylis retusa (L.) using RAPD markers. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 281, 110008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, M.; Kumari, N.; Jaiswal, V.S.; Jaiswal, U.; Singh, M. Somatic embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos of Sterculia alata Roxb. and monitoring the ontogeny and the genetic fidelity of somatic embryos. Int. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2017, 3, 53–67. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Mayahi, A.M.W. The effect of polyamines and silver thiosulphate on micropropagation of Date Palm followed by genetic stability assessment. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurme, S.T.; Jadhav, P.P.; Pawar, K.D.; Bapat, V.A.; Jadhav, J.P. Somatic embryogenesis and evaluation of genetic fidelity in Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson. J. Crop Improv. 2018, 32, 801–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwal, M.M.; Lamichhane, J.; Gauchan, D.P. Assessment of Genetic Stability of Micropropagated Bambusa balcooa Roxb. using RAPD Marker. Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, M.; Soni, M.; Sharma, D.P.; Vivek, M.; Sharma, V. In vitro propagation of Plum (Prunus salicina) cv. ‘Santa Rosa’and assessment of genetic stability using RAPD markers. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 23, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nandhakumar, N.; Kumar, K.; Sudhakar, D.; Soorianathasundaram, K. Plant regeneration, developmental pattern formation and genetic fidelity of somatic embryogenesis derived Musa spp. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asadi-Aghbolaghi, M.; Dedicova, B.; Ranade, S.S.; Le, K.C.; Sharifzadeh, F.; Omidi, M.; Egertsdotter, U. Protocol development for somatic embryogenesis, SSR markers and genetic modifcation of Stipagrostis pennata (Trin.) De Winter. Plant Methods 2021, 17, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pandey, S.; Sundararajan, S.; Ramalingam, S.; Baniya, M.K.; Pant, B. Rapid clonal propagation and valepotriates accumulation in cultures of Valeriana jatamansi Jones, a high-value medicinal plant. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2020, 93, 177–185. [Google Scholar]
- Srinivasan, P.; Raja, H.D.; Tamilvanan, R. Efficient in vitro plant regeneration from leaf-derived callus and genetic fidelity assessment of an endemic medicinal plant Ranunculus wallichianus Wight and Arnn by using RAPD and ISSR markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2021, 147, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasudevan, V.; Subramanyam, K.; Elayaraja, D.; Karthik, S.; Vasudevan, A.; Manickavasagam, M. Assessment of the efficacy of amino acids and polyamines on regeneration of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.) and analysis of genetic fidelity of regenerated plants by SCoT and RAPD markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 130, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajithan, C.; Vasudevan, V.; Sathish, D.; Sathish, S.; Krishnan, V.; Manickavasagam, M. The influential role of polyamines on the in vitro regeneration of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and genetic fidelity assessment by SCoT and RAPD markers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 139, 547–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthukumar, M.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Kumar, T.S.; Rao, M.V. Direct regeneration, microshoot recovery and assessment of genetic fidelity in Helicteres isora L., a medicinally important tree. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 23, 101415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Type of Nutrients | Species | Explant | Culture Media | Organic Growth Additives | Main Results | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vegetable, fruit, and plant extracts | Daphne sp. (caucasica, tangutica, jasminea) | Shoot | MS | CW: 10 mL/L PP: 10 mL/L AAN: 20 mg/L CHT: 15 mg/L Desmodesmus subspicatus: 20%, 50% | D. tangutica: Shoot proliferation was improved by medium supplementation with CW and PP (micropropagation coefficient 16.6 and 13.4). D. caucasica: The highest frequency of adventitious rhizogenesis (57.1%) occurred when tissues were cultured on MS + 10 mL/L PP. D. jasminea: The rooting percentage was 14% and 8.9% for PP and CW. | [24] |
Celosia sp. | Stem | MS | MCJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L YCJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L PJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L BJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L TJ: 20, 30, 50, 70 mL/L | YCJ at 70 mL/L induced the highest shoot regeneration (14.21). BJ and TJ promote the highest shoot regeneration of stem segments at 50 mL/L which produced 9.57 and 9.28 shoots per explant, while PJ, at the lowest concentration (20 mL/L), showed the highest shoot regeneration (10.5). | [25] | |
Raphunus sativus | Hypocotyl | MS | CW: 20%, CM: 20%, GSL: 10%, GPT: 10%, GC: 10%, RF: 5%, GG: 10%, GP: 10%, BF: 10%, OJ: 10% | The highest number of shoots (12 shoots/explant) was observed in MS supplemented with 2.5 mg/L BAP + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 10% OJ, whereas 8 shoots/explant were obtained with 20% CW. Media with GSL, RF, GG, GPT, and BJ inhibit shoot regeneration. | [14] | |
Epidendrum nocturnum | PBLs | OSM | BW: 10 g/L CW: 10 mL/L 5 g/L BW + 5 mL/L CW PD: 10 g/L | Media with 5 g/L BW + 5 mL/L CW showed greater plant length (19.80 mm), the number of roots (2.1), and fresh weight (0.08 g). | [16] | |
Cypripedium macranthos | PLBs | ¼ MS | CW: 50, 100, 200 mL/L BSP: 50, 100, 200 mL/L MSP: 50, 100, 200 mL/L BW: 15, 30, 60 g/L P: 1, 2, 4 g/L | The highest germination and protocorm formation percentages (70.8% and 74.2%) were obtained with 100 mL/L CW. | [15] | |
Dendrobium lowi | Protocorms | KC | CW: 10%, 15%, 20% TJ: 10%, 15%, 20% BP: 25, 75, 125 g/L P: 2 g/L | Protocorm treated with 25 g/L BP showed the highest GI values of 593.3 with 100% protocorms successfully developing shoots and 93.3% of protocorms producing root. | [26] | |
Musa cv. Rajabulu | Shoots | MS | CW: 50, 100, 150, 200 mL/L | The supplementation of CW (50 and 100 mL/L) showed the best results on the average number of roots (9.33, 9.00) and root length (11.6, 10.76 cm). Acclimatization succeeded (100%) with CW (50 to 200 mL/L). | [27] | |
Musa acuminata | Shoot | MS | CW: 200 mL/L PPJ: 200 mL/L OJ: 200 mL/L | MS supplemented with 200 mL/L CW resulted in the highest number of shoots/explant (1.71), the longest shoot length (4.25 cm), and the highest number of leaves/explant (4). | [18] | |
Dendrobium chryseum | Protocorms | ½ MS | CW: 5%, 10% | The highest number of shoots developed on ½ MS fortified with 2 mg/L Kn + 10% CW and the longest shoots were obtained on ½ MS + 1 mg/L GA3 + 10% CW. | [28] | |
Dianthus caryophyllus | Shoot tip Node | MS | CW: 5%, 8%, 10%, 15%, 20% | The best regeneration was obtained on MS supplemented with 1 mg/L BAP +10% CW which increased the number of shoots per culture (nodal explant:113.83 and, shoot tip explant: 93.33). | [29] | |
Gastrochilus matsuran | PLBs | ½ MS | CW: 0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10% | When 5% CW was added to ½ MS + 0.05% AC + 1% BP + 0.2% P + 1 µM NAA + 1.5 µM GA3. It produced the highest germination percentage at 93.3%. | [30] | |
Hylocereus polyrhizus | Stem | MS | MCW: 2%, 4%, 6% | Adding 4% MCW and 3% sucrose in MS media increased the shoot elongation (2.45 cm). | [31] | |
Echinacea purpurea | Petiole | MS | LH: 100, 300, 900 mg/L P: 100, 300, 900 mg/L Y: 100, 300, 900 mg/L CW: 2%, 4%, 8% | Shoot multiplication has been enhanced with 2% CW on MS containing 0.3 mg/L BA + 0.01 mg/L NAA (2.58 buds/explant). | [32] | |
Physalis angulata | Node | MS | TJ: 5%, 7.5%, 10% B: 1.25%, 2.5%, 3.75% | The maximum shoot number (12.5) was produced in MS + 2 mg/L BAP + 0.05 mg/L IAA + 5% TJ while the maximum shoot length (10.7 cm) was obtained with 7.5% TJ. | [33] | |
Laelia rubescens | PLBs | Phy MS ½ MS | CW: 100 mL/L PJ: 100 mL/L | Phy media supplemented with 100 mL/L PJ resulted in the highest seedling height (1.31 cm), number of leaves per seedling (3.33), and roots (2.33) | [34] | |
xLaeliocattleya | PLBs | OSM MS | CW: 200 mL/L PJ: 200 mL/L | MS supplemented with PJ produced the highest results in asymbiotic germination (56%) and seedlings formation (25.8). | [35] | |
Aloe vera | Shoot tip | Shoot multiplication: MS | AvG: 2.5%, 5%, 10% | Adding AvG to MS media increased the number of axillary shoots compared to the control. The highest axillary shoot number was recorded on a medium containing 5% AvG (13.27) and the highest shoot elongation (2.5 cm) was recorded on a medium supplemented with 2.5% AvG. | [36] | |
Rooting: ½ MS | AvG: 10%, 20%, 30% | The highest root number and the greatest root length (5.73 and 5.90 cm) were recorded on MS medium supplemented with 10% AvG. | ||||
Aloe vera | Rhizomatous stem | Shoot multiplication: MS | AvG: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% | The highest number of formed shoots per explant (length ≥ 2 cm) was 17.8 shoots on MS medium supplemented with 10% AvG. | [37] | |
Rooting: ⅓ MS | AvG: 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% | Adding AvG (20% and 30%) to ⅓ MS increased the rooting response to 100%, the number of roots per shoot (9.8 and 9.2), and the length of the roots (3.1 and 2.8). | ||||
Bacopa chamaedryoides | Shoot tip, nodes | Rooting: ½ MS | AvG: 50% | The best rooting response (100%), number (18.3), and length of shoots (2.3 cm) were achieved on ½ MS supplemented with 50% AvG. | [38] | |
Amino acids, polyamines, and proteins | Aegle marmelos | Nodes, internodes, shoot tip, leaves | MS | Amino acids (Met, Glu, Gly, Trp, Pro, Lys, Arg, Gln): 10, 20, 30, 40 mg/L | MS medium containing 2 mg/L BAP and a combination of all amino acids in 20 mg/L obtained the optimum axillary shoot proliferation response (100%) and average shoot numbers per explant (2.22). | [39] |
Chlorophytum borivilianum | Node | Shoot morphogenesis: MS | Ads: 10, 20 mg/L CH: 10, 20, 30 mg/L PU: 0, 10, 30, 50, 70, 100 mg/L | The best response for shoot morphogenesis (96.67%) was achieved on MS supplemented with 2 mg/L BAP + 1 mg/L NAA + 20 mg/L Ads. | [40] | |
Rooting: ½ MS | PU: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 mg/L | ½ MS with IBA (2 mg/L) + PU (9 mg/L) was best for rooting with 83.33% root induction. | ||||
Rosa canina | Node | VS | CH: 200, 400, 600 mg/L Glu: 2, 4, 8, 12 mg/L Pro: 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 mg/L | The maximum shoot number (4.1 shoots/explant) was obtained in VS supplemented with 600 mg/L CH. Glu at 12 mg/L enhanced shoot regeneration and leaf number compared to the control. | [41] | |
Orthosiphon aristatus | Node | MS | P: 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/L, Asn: 10, 20, 30, 40 mg/L Gln:10, 20, 30, 40 mg/L WJ: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% CW: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% CW (10%) + Gln: 20, 30 mg/L CW (10%) + Asn: 20, 30 mg/L | MS supplemented with 1 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L KIN + 10% CW and Gln or Asn increased the number of shoots/explant. Gln at 30 mg/L produced 44.04 shoots/explant with a mean length of 7.47 cm, whereas 20 mg/L Asn resulted in 40.43 shoots/explant and 6.89 cm shoot length after 8 weeks of culture. | [42] | |
Vanda helvola | Protocorms | KC | TJ: 10%, 20%, 40% CW: 10%, 20%, 40% P: 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4% YE: 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4% | Protocorms (99.50%) treated in KC containing 0.1% P successfully produced 3.10 leaves with an average length of 10.97 mm per responsive explant after 90 days of culture. | [43] | |
Stevia rebaudiana | Node | MS | CH: 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1% CW: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% ME: 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1% YE: 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1% | MS supplemented with 2 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L Kin + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 0.05% CH resulted in a maximum of 15 shoots. A 90% regeneration frequency and shoot length of 6 cm were recorded per explant. | [44] | |
Essential oils | Aloe vera | Shoot tip | MS | AC: 0.5 g/L T. vulgaris EO: 0.1%, 0.2% R. officinalis EO: 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.075%, 0.1% | Explant survival was 100% after 4 weeks of culture with R. officinalis EO concentrations of 0.05%, 0.075%, and 0.1% with no signs of browning. The lowest infection percentage (10%) was observed for media containing 0.075% and 0.1% of R. officinalis EO. The highest number of leaves per explant was 3.71 with 0.1% R. officinalis EO and the greatest leaf length was 3.18 cm with 0.05%. | [45] |
Fragaria × ananassa (Duch) | Leaves | MS | Eugenol: 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.5%, 2.5%, 5% Carvacrol: 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.5%, 2.5%, 5% Thymol: 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.5%, 2.5%, 5% | All essential oil treatments resulted in sterile conditions of the medium. The growth of in vitro contaminations from fungi and bacteria was inhibited at 0.01% and 0.5% concentrations, respectively. | [46] | |
Phoenix Dactylifera | Node | MS | Mentha piperita: 2% Thymus vulgaris: 2% Cinnamomum camphora: 2% | All the essential oils inhibited the mycelial growth and fungus contamination of tissue culture. | [47] | |
Cynodon dactylon | Node | MS | Thymol: 100, 200 mg/L (30, 60, and 120 min soaking time) Carvacrol:100, 200 mg/L (30, 60, and 120 min soaking time) | Increasing the period of exposure (60–120 min) with thymol and carvacrol at 200 mg/L led to the appropriate control of fungi and bacterial infection of explants. | [48] |
Molecular Marker | Species | Organic Growth Additives | Main Results | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
RAPD | Sterculia alata | Pro: 50, 100, 200, 300, 400 mg/L Gln: 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 mg/L | The optimum development and maturation of somatic embryos were observed by the supplementation of 400 mg/L Gln. All 25 RAPD primers generated distinct amplification profiles with the same banding pattern of all the samples. The total number of amplification products was 181 bands with an average of 7.24 bands per primer. | [89] |
Phoenix dactylifera | PU: 25, 75, 150 mg/L Spd: 25, 75, 150 mg/L | The two types of polyamines (PU and Spd) at 75 mg/L each, were the most effective treatments in root formation and number. All four RAPD primers showed unambiguous amplifications with monomorphic bands among both in vitro-derived plants and the mother plant. | [90] | |
Amorphophallus paeoniifolius | CW: 15% Gln: 1.36, 3.42 µM CH: 0.05% | MS medium supplemented with 15% CW in combination with 4.43 µM BAP resulted in the best shooting frequency (90%) and plant number (18). Among 10 RAPD primers tested, only 6 generated a total of 292 bands without any polymorphic bands between 10 in vitro regenerants and their mother plant. | [91] | |
Bambusa balcooa | AvLE: 1% | The addition of 1% AvLE to MS liquid media has fully controlled culture contamination and enhanced shoot number and length. Out of 20 RAPD primers, only 8 primers yielded 22.44 reproducible and scorable bands with 2.8 bands per primer ranging in size from 100 to 1800 bp. All amplified bands were monomorphic across the in vitro-raised plants and their mother plant. | [92] | |
Rhynchostylis retusa | CW: 5%, 10% Fungal elicitors isolated from Vanda cristata | The highest shoot number and length were found on MS medium supplemented with 10% CW, while a fungal elicitor showed the best response for root number and length. All RAPD primers (10) produced 23 amplification bands ranging in size from 275 to 1100 bp. Genetic uniformity among in vitro cultured plants and the mother plant was maintained. | [88] | |
Prunus salicina | CH: 10, 50, 100 mg/L | CH (at 10 mg/L) resulted in the best multiplication rate (5.08) and shoot elongation with an average shoot length of 2.94 cm. Out of 16 RAPD primers tested, 14 primers produced 43 amplification fragments ranging from 200 to 1500 bp in size. All banding profiles were monomorphic across all of the tested plants and similar to those of the mother plant. | [93] | |
ISSR | Musa spp. (Cultivars Grand Naine and Rasthali) | Pro: 100, 200, 300, 400 mg/L Gln: 100, 200, 300, 400 mg/L Asn: 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/L | Gln (400 mg/L) significantly enhanced the number of both primary (1680, 1850) and secondary (3597, 3270) somatic embryos per culture from Grand Naine and Rasthali cultivars, respectively. All 10 ISSR primers generated a total of 1534 and 1488 bands ranging from 200 bp to 2500 bp in size in Grand Naine and Rasthali cultivars, respectively, giving rise to only monomorphic bands across all the tested plants in both cultivars. | [94] |
SSR | Musa AAB cultivar Chenichampa | ME: 100 mg/L YE: 100 mg/L CH: 50, 100, 150 mg/L Gln: 50, 100, 150 mg/L | The highest somatic embryo induction (85%) was observed when CH (100 mg/L) and Gln (150 mg/L) were supplemented to the media as compared to the control. No somaclonal variations were detected using 10 SSR primers among the embryogenic cell suspension-derived plants and their mother plant. | [87] |
Stipagrostis pennata | Gln: 500 mg/L CH: 100 mg/L | The highest embryogenic callus induction was observed when Gln and CH were supplemented to the culture media. In total, 10 SSR primes were tested, out of which 4 primers showed a single amplification band size of 185, 412, 243, and 210 bp for primers 1, 3, 7, and 8, respectively. | [95] | |
RAPD and ISSR | Oryza sativa | SSE: 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% | The SSE supplementation in a dose-dependent manner resulted in the highest shoot, root length, and root biomass. Only 2 RAPD (out of 6) and 4 ISSR (out of 11) primers produced stable amplicons with 11 and 26 monomorphic amplicons, respectively. | [86] |
Valeriana jatamansi | CW: 10% | The supplementation of 10% CW resulted in the maximum response with regard to shoot and root numbers and lengths (13 cm, 19.6 cm, 6 cm, and 7.5 cm, respectively). Out of the 35 RAPD and 10 ISSR primers analyzed, only 10 RAPD and 5 ISSR primers produced a total of 32 and 12 similar banding patterns between the in vitro raised plantlets and the mother plant, respectively. | [96] | |
Ranunculus wallichianus | CW: 10% | MS medium supplemented with 10% CW resulted in the highest regeneration response (97%), number of shoot formations (11.1 shoots/culture), and shoot length (9.2 cm). In total, 9 RAPD and 8 ISSR primers produced 56 and 47 bands with an average of 6 and 5 bands per primer ranging from 200 to 1500 bp and 200 to 1000 bp in size, respectively. | [97] | |
RAPD and SCoT | Citrullus lanatus | Spd: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mg/L Spm: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mg/L PU: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mg/L | Spd (10 mg/L) increased shoot induction response (93%), shoot number (46.43 shoots per explant), and shoot elongation (6.3 cm). PU (10 mg/L) showed the highest rooting percentage (95%) with the production of 23.03 roots per shoot measuring 4.32 cm in length In total, 9 RAPD and 17 SCoT primers produced 41 and 47 monomorphic fragments in the size range of 200–1800 and 300 to 2000 bp, respectively. | [98] |
Pisum sativum | Spd: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mg/L Spm: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mg/L PU: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mg/L | The highest multiple shoots number (65.1 shoots/explant) was attained with 20 mg/L SPD while 30 mg/L PU produced the highest number of roots (33.66 roots/shoot). In total, 9 RAPD and 17 SCoT primers produced 34 and 38 monomorphic fragments with the ranges of 400 to 600 and 100 to 500 bp, respectively. | [99] | |
ISSR and SCoT | Helicteres isora | Gln: 25, 50, 75, 100 mg/L SC: 10, 20, 30, 40 mg/L | Gln (50 mg/L) produced the highest shoot number (21.3, 16.9) from both cotyledonary node and axillary node explants, respectively. In total, 5 ISSR primers (out of 10), produced 27 reproducible bands with 5.4 bands per primer varying in size from 0.3 to 2.2 kb. Out of the 17 SCoT primers tried, 13 primers produced 63 monomorphic bands with 4.8 bands per primer ranging in size from 0.3 to 3 kb. In both ISSR and SCoT techniques, all the resolved bands were monomorphic to all in vitro regenerated plants as well as their in vivo-based mother plant. | [100] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hamdeni, I.; Louhaichi, M.; Slim, S.; Boulila, A.; Bettaieb, T. Incorporation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Tissue Culture for Producing Genetically Stable Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223087
Hamdeni I, Louhaichi M, Slim S, Boulila A, Bettaieb T. Incorporation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Tissue Culture for Producing Genetically Stable Plants. Plants. 2022; 11(22):3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223087
Chicago/Turabian StyleHamdeni, Imtinene, Mounir Louhaichi, Slim Slim, Abdennacer Boulila, and Taoufik Bettaieb. 2022. "Incorporation of Organic Growth Additives to Enhance In Vitro Tissue Culture for Producing Genetically Stable Plants" Plants 11, no. 22: 3087. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223087